Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: patterns of plasticity and the emergence of ecotypes

Phenotypic plasticity itself evolves, as does any other quantitative trait. A very different question is whether phenotypic plasticity causes evolution or is a major evolutionary mechanism. Existing models of the evolution of phenotypic plasticity cover many of the proposals in the literature about the role of phenotypic plasticity in evolution. I will extend existing models to cover adaptation to a novel environment, the appearance of ecotypes and possible covariation between phenotypic plasticity and mean trait value of ecotypes. Genetic assimilation does not sufficiently explain details of observed patterns. Phenotypic plasticity as a major mechanism for evolution--such as, invading new niches, speciation or macroevolution--has, at present, neither empirical nor model support.     

Divergence in male mating tactics between two populations of the soapberry bug: II. Genetic change and the evolution of a plastic reaction norm in a variable social environment

Many social behaviors are conditional, but behavioral comparisonsbetween populations do not normally distinguish genetic andenvironmental causation. As a result, the opportunity to testpredictions about the evolution of strategic conditionality(genotype x environment interaction) is lost. We apply theseconcepts in an examination of how interpopulation differencesin mean and variance of sex ratio have led to genetic differencesin the allocation of male effort to mate guarding versus nonguardingbetween genetically isolated populations of the soapberry bugin Oklahoma and Florida. We observed the mating behavior ofmales from the two populations at a series of experimental sexratios, and modeled their mating decisions as first-order Markovchains of independent mating states. Likelihood ratio testsof these behavioral sequences showed that the populations differedsignificantly in their response to sex ratio, and that onlymales from the variable environment (Oklahoma) altered theirbehavior in response to differences in female availability amongthe treatments. The flexible strategy of this population maybe adaptive and probably has evolved in response to sex ratiovariability.