Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Nucleocapsid p1 Confers ESCRT Pathway Dependence

To facilitate the release of infectious progeny virions, human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) exploits the Endosomal Sorting Complex Required for Transport (ESCRT) pathway by engaging Tsg101 and ALIX through late assembly (L) domains in the C-terminal p6 domain of Gag. However, the L domains in p6 are known to be dispensable for efficient particle production by certain HIV-1 Gag constructs that have the nucleocapsid (NC) domain replaced by a foreign dimerization domain to substitute for the assembly function of NC. We now show that one such L domain-independent HIV-1 Gag construct (termed Z_WT) that has NC-p1-p6 replaced by a leucine zipper domain is resistant to dominant-negative inhibitors of the ESCRT pathway that block HIV-1 particle production. However, Z_WT became dependent on the presence of an L domain when NC-p1-p6 was restored to its C terminus. Furthermore, when the NC domain was replaced by a leucine zipper, the p1-p6 region, but not p6 alone, conferred sensitivity to inhibition of the ESCRT pathway. In an authentic HIV-1 Gag context, the effect of an inhibitor of the ESCRT pathway on particle production could be alleviated by deleting a portion of the NC domain together with p1. Together, these results indicate that the ESCRT pathway dependence of HIV-1 budding is determined, at least in part, by the NC-p1 region of Gag.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and other retroviruses hijack the cellular Endosomal Sorting Complex Required for Transport (ESCRT) pathway to promote the detachment of virions from the cell surface and from each other (3, 21, 42, 44, 47). The ESCRT pathway was initially identified based on its requirement for the sorting of ubiquitinated cargo into multivesicular bodies (MVB) (50, 51). During MVB biogenesis, the ESCRT pathway drives the membrane deformation and fission events required for the inward vesiculation of the limiting membrane of this organelle (26, 29, 50, 51). More recently, it emerged that the ESCRT pathway is also essential for the normal abscission of daughter cells during the final stage of cell division (10, 43). Most of the components of the ESCRT pathway are involved in the formation of four heteromeric protein complexes termed ESCRT-0, ESCRT-I, ESCRT-II, and ESCRT-III. Additional components include ALIX, which interacts both with ESCRT-I and ESCRT-III, and the AAA ATPase Vps4, which mediates the disassembly of ESCRT-III (29, 42).The deformation and scission of endocytic membranes is thought to be mediated by ESCRT-III, which, together with Vps4, constitutes the most conserved element of the pathway (23, 26, 42). Indeed, it was recently shown that purified yeast ESCRT-III induces membrane deformation (52), and in another study three subunits of yeast ESCRT-III were sufficient to promote the formation of intralumenal vesicles in an in vitro assay (61). In mammals, ESCRT-III is formed by the charged MVB proteins (CHMPs), which are structurally related and tightly regulated through autoinhibition (2, 33, 46, 53, 62). The removal of an inhibitory C-terminal domain induces polymerization and association with endosomal membranes and converts CHMPs into potent inhibitors of retroviral budding (34, 46, 53, 60, 62). Alternatively, CHMPs can be converted into strong inhibitors of the ESCRT pathway and of HIV-1 budding through the addition of a bulky tag such as green fluorescent protein (GFP) or red fluorescent protein (RFP) (27, 36, 39, 54). Retroviral budding in general is also strongly inhibited by catalytically inactive Vps4 (22, 41, 55), or upon Vsp4B depletion (31), confirming the crucial role of ESCRT-III.Retroviruses engage the ESCRT pathway through the activity of so-called late assembly (L) domains in Gag. In the case of HIV-1, the primary L domain maps to a conserved PTAP motif in the C-terminal p6 domain of Gag (24, 28) and interacts with the ESCRT-I component Tsg101 (15, 22, 40, 58). HIV-1 p6 also harbors an auxiliary L domain of the LYPx_nL type, which interacts with the V domain of ALIX (20, 35, 39, 54, 59, 63). Interestingly, Tsg101 binding site mutants of HIV-1 can be fully rescued through the overexpression of ALIX, and this rescue depends on the ALIX binding site in p6 (20, 56). In contrast, the overexpression of a specific splice variant of the ubiquitin ligase Nedd4-2 has been shown to rescue the release and infectivity of HIV-1 mutants lacking all known L domains in p6 (12, 57). Nedd4 family ubiquitin ligases had previously been implicated in the function of PPxY-type L domains, which also depend on an intact ESCRT pathway for function (4, 32, 38). However, HIV-1 Gag lacks PPxY motifs, and the WW domains of Nedd4-2, which mediate its interaction with PPxY motifs, are dispensable for the rescue of HIV-1 L domain mutants (57).ALIX also interacts with the nucleocapsid (NC) region of HIV-1 Gag (18, 49), which is located upstream of p6 and the p1 spacer peptide. ALIX binds HIV-1 NC via its Bro1 domain, and the capacity to interact with NC and to stimulate the release of a minimal HIV-1 Gag construct is shared among widely divergent Bro1 domain proteins (48). Based on these findings and the observation that certain mutations in NC cause a phenotype that resembles that of L domain mutants, it has been proposed that NC cooperates with p6 to recruit the machinery required for normal HIV-1 budding (18, 49).NC also plays a role in Gag polyprotein multimerization, and this function of NC depends on its RNA-binding activity (5-8). It has been proposed that the role of the NC-nucleic acid interaction during assembly is to promote the formation of Gag dimers (37), and HIV-1 assembly in the absence of NC can indeed be efficiently rescued by leucine zipper dimerization domains (65). Surprisingly, in this setting the L domains in p6 also became dispensable, since particle production remained efficient even when the entire NC-p1-p6 region of HIV-1 Gag was replaced by a leucine zipper (1, 65). These findings raised the possibility that the reliance of wild-type (WT) HIV-1 Gag on a functional ESCRT pathway is, at least in part, specified by NC-p1-p6. However, it also remained possible that the chimeric Gag constructs engaged the ESCRT pathway in an alternative manner.In the present report, we provide evidence supporting the first of those two possibilities. Particle production became independent of ESCRT when the entire NC-p1-p6 region was replaced by a leucine zipper, and reversion to ESCRT dependence was shown to occur as a result of restoration of p1-p6 but not of p6 alone. Furthermore, although the deletion of p1 alone had little effect in an authentic HIV-1 Gag context, the additional removal of a portion of NC improved particle production in the presence of an inhibitor of the ESCRT pathway. Together, these data imply that the NC-p1 region plays an important role in the ESCRT-dependence of HIV-1 particle production.     

The ESCRT-Associated Protein Alix Recruits the Ubiquitin Ligase Nedd4-1 To Facilitate HIV-1 Release through the LYPXnL L Domain Motif

The p6 region of HIV-1 Gag contains two late (L) domains, PTAP and LYPX_nL, that bind Tsg101 and Alix, respectively. Interactions with these two cellular proteins recruit members of the host''s fission machinery (ESCRT) to facilitate HIV-1 release. Other retroviruses gain access to the host ESCRT components by utilizing a PPXY-type L domain that interacts with cellular Nedd4-like ubiquitin ligases. Despite the absence of a PPXY motif in HIV-1 Gag, interaction with the ubiquitin ligase Nedd4-2 was recently shown to stimulate HIV-1 release. We show here that another Nedd4-like ubiquitin ligase, Nedd4-1, corrected release defects resulting from the disruption of PTAP (PTAP⁻), suggesting that HIV-1 Gag also recruits Nedd4-1 to facilitate virus release. Notably, Nedd4-1 remediation of HIV-1 PTAP⁻ budding defects is independent of cellular Tsg101, implying that Nedd4-1''s function in HIV-1 release does not involve ESCRT-I components and is therefore distinct from that of Nedd4-2. Consistent with this finding, deletion of the p6 region decreased Nedd4-1-Gag interaction, and disruption of the LYPX_nL motif eliminated Nedd4-1-mediated restoration of HIV-1 PTAP⁻. This result indicated that both Nedd4-1 interaction with Gag and function in virus release occur through the Alix-binding LYPX_nL motif. Mutations of basic residues located in the NC domain of Gag that are critical for Alix''s facilitation of HIV-1 release, also disrupted release mediated by Nedd4-1, further confirming a Nedd4-1-Alix functional interdependence. In fact we found that Nedd4-1 binds Alix in both immunoprecipitation and yeast-two-hybrid assays. In addition, Nedd4-1 requires its catalytic activity to promote virus release. Remarkably, RNAi knockdown of cellular Nedd4-1 eliminated Alix ubiquitination in the cell and impeded its ability to function in HIV-1 release. Together our data support a model in which Alix recruits Nedd4-1 to facilitate HIV-1 release mediated through the LYPX_nL/Alix budding pathway via a mechanism that involves Alix ubiquitination.Retroviral Gag polyproteins bear short conserved sequences that control virus budding and release. As such, these motifs have been dubbed late or L domains (49). Three types of L domains have thus far been characterized: PT/SAP, LYPX_nL, and PPPY motifs (5, 9, 32). They recruit host proteins known to function in the vacuolar protein sorting (vps) of cargo proteins and the generation of multivesicular bodies (MVB) compartments (2). It is currently accepted that budding of vesicles into MVB involves the sequential recruitment of endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT-I, -II, and -III) and the activity of the VPS4 AAA-ATPase (22). These sorting events are believed to be triggered by recognition of ubiquitin molecules conjugated to cargo proteins (20, 24, 41). For retrovirus budding, L domain motifs are the primary signals in Gag that elicit the recruitment of ESCRT components to facilitate viral budding. Consequently, mutations in L domain motifs or dominant-negative interference with the function of ESCRT-III members or the VPS4 ATPase adversely affect virus release. This indicates that Gag interactions with the ESCRT machinery are necessary for virus budding and separation from the cell (7, 10, 15, 16, 21, 28, 44).Two late domains have been identified within the p6 region of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Gag protein: the PTAP and LYPX_nL motifs. The PTAP motif binds the cellular protein Tsg101 (15, 39, 40, 47), whereas the LYPX_nL motif is the docking site for Alix (44). Tsg101 functions in HIV-1 budding (15) as a member of ESCRT-I (30, 48), a soluble complex required for the generation of MVB. This process is topologically similar to HIV-1 budding and requires the recruitment of ESCRT-III members called the charged-multivesicular body proteins (3, 29, 48) and the activity of the VPS4 AAA-ATPase (4, 48). In addition to binding the LYPX_nL motif, Alix also interacts with the nucleocapsid (NC) domain of HIV-1 Gag (13, 38), thus linking Gag to components of ESCRT-III that are critical for virus release (13).Other retroviruses, including the human T-cell leukemia virus (HTLV) and the Moloney murine leukemia virus (MoMLV), utilize the PPPY-type L domain to efficiently release virus (7, 26, 51). The PPPY motif binds members of the Nedd4-like ubiquitin ligase family (6, 7, 16, 19, 25, 43), whose normal cellular function is to ubiquitinate cargo proteins and target them into the MVB sorting pathway (11, 12, 20). Members of the Nedd4-like ubiquitin ligase family include Nedd4-1, Nedd4-2 (also known as Nedd4L), WWP-1/2, and Itch. They contain three distinct domains: an N-terminal membrane binding C2 domain (12), a central PPPY-interacting WW domain (43), and a C-terminal HECT domain that contains the ubiquitin ligase active site (42). The functional requirement for the binding of Nedd4-like ubiquitin ligases to the PPPY motif in virus budding has been demonstrated (7, 16, 18, 19, 25, 26, 28, 50, 51). Overexpression of dominant-negative mutants of Nedd4-like ligases, ESCRT-III components, or VPS4 cause a potent inhibition of PPPY-dependent virus release (7, 19, 29, 31, 52) and induce assembly and budding defects similar to those observed after perturbation of the PPPY motif (26, 51). These observations demonstrated that Nedd4-like ligases connect Gag encoding PPPY motif to ESCRT-III and VPS4 proteins to facilitate virus release.Whereas the role of Nedd4-like ubiquitin ligases in virus budding has been established, the protein interactions that link them to the cell''s ESCRT-III pathway are still unknown. Evidence for associations of Nedd4-like ligases with ESCRT proteins have been previously reported and include: the binding of Nedd4-like ubiquitin ligases LD1 and Nedd4-1 to ESCRT-I member Tsg101 (6, 31), the colocalization of multiple Nedd4-like ubiquitin ligases with endosomal compartments (1, 28), the requirement of the cell''s ESCRT pathway for Itch mediated L domain independent stimulation of MoMLV release (23), and the ubiquitination of ESCRT-I components with a shorter isoform, Nedd4-2s (8). Therefore, Nedd4-like ubiquitin ligase interactions with members of the cell''s ESCRT pathway may provide retroviral Gag with access to the host budding machinery required for virus release.Although HIV-1 Gag does not carry the PPPY canonical sequence known to interact with Nedd4-like ubiquitin ligases, both Nedd4-1 and Nedd4-2 were shown to restore the release of the HIV-1 PTAP⁻ mutant, albeit Nedd4-1 with less efficiency than Nedd4-2 (8, 46). These findings suggested that HIV-1 might utilize cellular Nedd4-like ubiquitin ligases to increase virus release. We present here evidence demonstrating that Nedd4-1 interacts with Gag and enhances HIV-1 PTAP⁻ virus release. Furthermore, we show that Nedd4-1''s function in HIV-1 release is distinct from that of Nedd4-2 in both its viral and cellular requirements. Notably, we found that Nedd4-1 enhancement of HIV-1 release requires the Alix-binding LYPX_nL L domain motif in the p6 region and basic residues in the NC domain. In addition, Alix''s facilitation of HIV-1 release requires cellular Nedd4-1, since mutations in NC that prevented Alix-mediated HIV-1 release also eliminated release by overexpression of Nedd4-1. This suggested a Nedd4-1-Alix physical and functional interdependence. In agreement with this, we found Nedd4-1 to bind and ubiquitinate Alix in the cell. Taken together, these results support a model in which Alix recruits Nedd4-1 to facilitate late steps of HIV-1 release through the LYPX_nL L domain motif via a mechanism that involves Alix ubiquitination.     

Preinfection Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Specific Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes Failed To Prevent HIV Type 1 Infection from Strains Genetically Unrelated to Viruses in Long-Term Exposed Partners

Understanding the mechanisms underlying potential altered susceptibility to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in highly exposed seronegative (ES) individuals and the later clinical consequences of breakthrough infection can provide insight into strategies to control HIV-1 with an effective vaccine. From our Seattle ES cohort, we identified one individual (LSC63) who seroconverted after over 2 years of repeated unprotected sexual contact with his HIV-1-infected partner (P63) and other sexual partners of unknown HIV-1 serostatus. The HIV-1 variants infecting LSC63 were genetically unrelated to those sequenced from P63. This may not be surprising, since viral load measurements in P63 were repeatedly below 50 copies/ml, making him an unlikely transmitter. However, broad HIV-1-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) responses were detected in LSC63 before seroconversion. Compared to those detected after seroconversion, these responses were of lower magnitude and half of them targeted different regions of the viral proteome. Strong HLA-B27-restricted CTLs, which have been associated with disease control, were detected in LSC63 after but not before seroconversion. Furthermore, for the majority of the protein-coding regions of the HIV-1 variants in LSC63 (except gp41, nef, and the 3′ half of pol), the genetic distances between the infecting viruses and the viruses to which he was exposed through P63 (termed the exposed virus) were comparable to the distances between random subtype B HIV-1 sequences and the exposed viruses. These results suggest that broad preinfection immune responses were not able to prevent the acquisition of HIV-1 infection in LSC63, even though the infecting viruses were not particularly distant from the viruses that may have elicited these responses.Understanding the mechanisms of altered susceptibility or control of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in highly exposed seronegative (ES) persons may provide invaluable information aiding the design of HIV-1 vaccines and therapy (9, 14, 15, 33, 45, 57, 58). In a cohort of female commercial sex workers in Nairobi, Kenya, a small proportion of individuals remained seronegative for over 3 years despite the continued practice of unprotected sex (12, 28, 55, 56). Similarly, resistance to HIV-1 infection has been reported in homosexual men who frequently practiced unprotected sex with infected partners (1, 15, 17, 21, 61). Multiple factors have been associated with the resistance to HIV-1 infection in ES individuals (32), including host genetic factors (8, 16, 20, 37-39, 44, 46, 47, 49, 59, 63), such as certain HLA class I and II alleles (41), as well as cellular (1, 15, 26, 55, 56), humoral (25, 29), and innate immune responses (22, 35).Seroconversion in previously HIV-resistant Nairobi female commercial sex workers, despite preexisting HIV-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) responses, has been reported (27). Similarly, 13 of 125 ES enrollees in our Seattle ES cohort (1, 15, 17) have become late seroconverters (H. Zhu, T. Andrus, Y. Liu, and T. Zhu, unpublished observations). Here, we analyze the virology, genetics, and immune responses of HIV-1 infection in one of the later seroconverting subjects, LSC63, who had developed broad CTL responses before seroconversion.     

Virus Entry via the Alternative Coreceptors CCR3 and FPRL1 Differs by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding to CD4 and a chemokine receptor, most commonly CCR5. CXCR4 is a frequent alternative coreceptor (CoR) in subtype B and D HIV-1 infection, but the importance of many other alternative CoRs remains elusive. We have analyzed HIV-1 envelope (Env) proteins from 66 individuals infected with the major subtypes of HIV-1 to determine if virus entry into highly permissive NP-2 cell lines expressing most known alternative CoRs differed by HIV-1 subtype. We also performed linear regression analysis to determine if virus entry via the major CoR CCR5 correlated with use of any alternative CoR and if this correlation differed by subtype. Virus pseudotyped with subtype B Env showed robust entry via CCR3 that was highly correlated with CCR5 entry efficiency. By contrast, viruses pseudotyped with subtype A and C Env proteins were able to use the recently described alternative CoR FPRL1 more efficiently than CCR3, and use of FPRL1 was correlated with CCR5 entry. Subtype D Env was unable to use either CCR3 or FPRL1 efficiently, a unique pattern of alternative CoR use. These results suggest that each subtype of circulating HIV-1 may be subject to somewhat different selective pressures for Env-mediated entry into target cells and suggest that CCR3 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtype B while FPRL1 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtypes A and C. These data may provide insight into development of resistance to CCR5-targeted entry inhibitors and alternative entry pathways for each HIV-1 subtype.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding first to CD4 and then to a coreceptor (CoR), of which C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is the most common (6, 53). CXCR4 is an additional CoR for up to 50% of subtype B and D HIV-1 isolates at very late stages of disease (4, 7, 28, 35). Many other seven-membrane-spanning G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been identified as alternative CoRs when expressed on various target cell lines in vitro, including CCR1 (76, 79), CCR2b (24), CCR3 (3, 5, 17, 32, 60), CCR8 (18, 34, 38), GPR1 (27, 65), GPR15/BOB (22), CXCR5 (39), CXCR6/Bonzo/STRL33/TYMSTR (9, 22, 25, 45, 46), APJ (26), CMKLR1/ChemR23 (49, 62), FPLR1 (67, 68), RDC1 (66), and D6 (55). HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac isolates more frequently show expanded use of these alternative CoRs than HIV-1 isolates (12, 30, 51, 74), and evidence that alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 mediate infection of primary target cells by HIV-1 isolates is sparse (18, 30, 53, 81). Genetic deficiency in CCR5 expression is highly protective against HIV-1 transmission (21, 36), establishing CCR5 as the primary CoR. The importance of alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 has remained elusive despite many studies (1, 30, 70, 81). Expansion of CoR use from CCR5 to include CXCR4 is frequently associated with the ability to use additional alternative CoRs for viral entry (8, 16, 20, 63, 79) in most but not all studies (29, 33, 40, 77, 78). This finding suggests that the sequence changes in HIV-1 env required for use of CXCR4 as an additional or alternative CoR (14, 15, 31, 37, 41, 57) are likely to increase the potential to use other alternative CoRs.We have used the highly permissive NP-2/CD4 human glioma cell line developed by Soda et al. (69) to classify virus entry via the alternative CoRs CCR1, CCR3, CCR8, GPR1, CXCR6, APJ, CMKLR1/ChemR23, FPRL1, and CXCR4. Full-length molecular clones of 66 env genes from most prevalent HIV-1 subtypes were used to generate infectious virus pseudotypes expressing a luciferase reporter construct (19, 57). Two types of analysis were performed: the level of virus entry mediated by each alternative CoR and linear regression of entry mediated by CCR5 versus all other alternative CoRs. We thus were able to identify patterns of alternative CoR use that were subtype specific and to determine if use of any alternative CoR was correlated or independent of CCR5-mediated entry. The results obtained have implications for the evolution of env function, and the analyses revealed important differences between subtype B Env function and all other HIV-1 subtypes.     

Compartmentalization and Clonal Amplification of HIV-1 Variants in the Cerebrospinal Fluid during Primary Infection

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-associated dementia (HAD) is a severe neurological disease that affects a subset of HIV-1-infected individuals. Increased compartmentalization has been reported between blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) HIV-1 populations in subjects with HAD, but it is still not known when compartmentalization arises during the course of infection. To assess HIV-1 genetic compartmentalization early during infection, we compared HIV-1 populations in the peripheral blood and CSF in 11 primary infection subjects, with analysis of longitudinal samples over the first 18 months for a subset of subjects. We used heteroduplex tracking assays targeting the variable regions of env and single-genome amplification and sequence analysis of the full-length env gene to identify CSF-compartmentalized variants and to examine viral genotypes within the compartmentalized populations. For most subjects, HIV-1 populations were equilibrated between the blood and CSF compartments. However, compartmentalized HIV-1 populations were detected in the CSF of three primary infection subjects, and longitudinal analysis of one subject revealed that compartmentalization during primary HIV-1 infection was resolved. Clonal amplification of specific HIV-1 variants was identified in the CSF population of one primary infection subject. Our data show that compartmentalization can occur in the central nervous system (CNS) of subjects in primary HIV-1 infection in part through persistence of the putative transmitted parental variant or via viral genetic adaptation to the CNS environment. The presence of distinct HIV-1 populations in the CSF indicates that independent HIV-1 replication can occur in the CNS, even early after HIV-1 transmission.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection of the central nervous system (CNS) can lead to neurological disease in a subset of HIV-infected individuals and may include the development of HIV-1-associated dementia (HAD) (2, 18). HAD is characterized by severe neurological dysfunction, and affected individuals generally have impaired cognitive and motor functions. HIV-1 enters the CNS during primary infection, most likely via the migration of infected monocytes and lymphocytes across the blood-brain barrier (33, 37, 42). The main cell types in the CNS that HIV-1 can productively infect are the perivascular macrophages and microglial cells, which express low receptor densities of CD4, CCR5, and CXCR4 (7, 18, 60, 63). Previous studies have also reported that neurotropic HIV-1 variants are generally macrophage tropic (19, 20, 32, 45, 52, 61). Although cells in the CNS may be infected with HIV-1 during the course of disease, it is still unclear whether productive HIV-1 replication occurs in the CNS early during infection.Genetically compartmentalized HIV-1 variants have been detected in the brains of HAD subjects at autopsy (13, 14, 43, 48, 52) and in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of HAD subjects sampled over the course of infection (26, 46, 51, 59). Extensive compartmentalization between the periphery and the CNS has been reported in subjects with HAD; however, it is not yet known when compartmentalization occurs during the course of HIV-1 infection. Primary HIV-1 infection refers to the acute and early phases of infection, during which peak plasma viremia often occurs and a viral “set point” may be reached (8, 34), within the first year after HIV exposure (64). Studies examining compartmentalization between the blood plasma and CSF during primary infection have been limited, and extensive compartmentalization has not been detected in primary infection subjects (26, 50).In this study, we examined HIV-1 genetic compartmentalization between the peripheral blood and CSF during primary HIV-1 infection. Cross-sectional and longitudinal blood plasma and CSF samples were analyzed for viral compartmentalization using the heteroduplex tracking assay (HTA) and single genome amplification (SGA). We used the HTA to differentiate between HIV-1 variants in the CSF that were either compartmentalized to the CSF or equilibrated with the peripheral blood. Previous studies have used the HTA to separate HIV-1 genetic variants in different anatomical compartments (10, 24, 27, 51) and to follow HIV-1 evolutionary variants over the course of infection (9, 25, 31, 41, 49, 50). We also conducted SGA on a subset of subjects to further examine viral genetic compartmentalization during primary infection. Here we report the detection of compartmentalized and clonally amplified HIV-1 variants in the CSF of subjects in the primary stage of HIV-1 infection. Our results suggest that minor to extensive HIV-1 genetic compartmentalization can occur between the periphery and the CNS during primary HIV-1 infection and that viral compartmentalization, as measured in the CSF, is transient in some subjects.     

Pseudotyping Incompatibility between HIV-1 and Gibbon Ape Leukemia Virus Env Is Modulated by Vpu

The Env protein from gibbon ape leukemia virus (GaLV) has been shown to be incompatible with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in the production of infectious pseudotyped particles. This incompatibility has been mapped to the C-terminal cytoplasmic tail of GaLV Env. Surprisingly, we found that the HIV-1 accessory protein Vpu modulates this incompatibility. The infectivity of HIV-1 pseudotyped with murine leukemia virus (MLV) Env was not affected by Vpu. However, the infectivity of HIV-1 pseudotyped with an MLV Env with the cytoplasmic tail from GaLV Env (MLV/GaLV Env) was restricted 50- to 100-fold by Vpu. A Vpu mutant containing a scrambled membrane-spanning domain, Vpu_RD, was still able to restrict MLV/GaLV Env, but mutation of the serine residues at positions 52 and 56 completely alleviated the restriction. Loss of infectivity appeared to be caused by reduced MLV/GaLV Env incorporation into viral particles. The mechanism of this downmodulation appears to be distinct from Vpu-mediated CD4 downmodulation because Vpu-expressing cells that failed to produce infectious HIV-1 particles nonetheless continued to display robust surface MLV/GaLV Env expression. In addition, if MLV and HIV-1 were simultaneously introduced into the same cells, only the HIV-1 particle infectivity was restricted by Vpu. Collectively, these data suggest that Vpu modulates the cellular distribution of MLV/GaLV Env, preventing its recruitment to HIV-1 budding sites.The gammaretrovirus gibbon ape leukemia virus (GaLV) has been widely used for gene therapy because of its wide host cell tropism and nonpathogenicity (1, 6, 10, 12, 13, 20). The host cell receptor for GaLV Env has been cloned and identified as a sodium-dependent phosphate transporter protein (25, 26). Like other retroviruses, GaLV encodes a single transmembrane surface glycoprotein (GaLV Env), which is cleaved into surface (SU) and transmembrane (TM) subunits (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). The TM domain of GaLV Env contains a short 30-amino-acid C-terminal cytoplasmic tail. Although GaLV Env functions well when coupled (pseudotyped) with murine leukemia virus (MLV)-based retroviral vectors, it has been shown to be completely incompatible with HIV-1 (4, 35). When GaLV Env is expressed with HIV-1, essentially no infectious HIV-1 particles are produced (4, 35). The mechanism for this infectivity downmodulation is unknown, but the component of GaLV Env responsible for the restriction has been mapped to the cytoplasmic tail. Replacing the cytoplasmic tail of GaLV Env with the equivalent sequence from MLV Env ameliorates the restriction. Likewise, replacing the cytoplasmic tail of MLV Env with that from GaLV Env confers the restriction (4).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Schematic of MLV Env protein. Sequences are the C-terminal cytoplasmic tails of MLV Env, GaLV Env, and human CD4. GaLV sequences in boldface are residues that have been shown to modulate the HIV-1 incompatibility (4). Underlined sequences in CD4 are amino acids required for Vpu-mediated downmodulation (2, 15). Arrows denote the location of MLV/GaLV tail substitution. SU, surface domain; TM, transmembrane domain.Vpu is an 81-amino-acid HIV-1 accessory protein produced from the same mRNA as the HIV-1 Env gene. The N terminus of Vpu contains a membrane-spanning domain, followed by a 50-amino-acid cytoplasmic domain. Vpu is unique to HIV-1 and a few closely related SIV strains. The best-characterized roles for Vpu in the HIV-1 life cycle are modulation of host proteins CD4 and tetherin (also known as BST-2, CD317, and HM1.24) (24, 38, 39). Vpu promotes the degradation of CD4 in the endoplasmic reticulum through a proteasome-dependent mechanism (29). The cytoplasmic tail of Vpu physically interacts with the cytoplasmic tail of CD4 and recruits the human β-transducing repeat-containing protein (β-TrCP) and E3 ubiquitin ligase components to polyubiquitinate and ultimately trigger the degradation of CD4 (18). Two serine residues at positions 52 and 56 of Vpu are phosphorylated by casein kinase-2 and are required for CD4 degradation (31, 32). The membrane-spanning domain of Vpu is not specifically required for CD4 degradation. A mutant protein containing a scrambled membrane-spanning sequence, Vpu_RD, is still able to trigger the degradation of CD4 (32). The region of CD4 that is targeted by Vpu is approximately 17 to 13 amino acids from the C terminus in the cytoplasmic tail (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) (2, 15).In addition to degrading CD4, Vpu has also long been known to result in enhanced viral release (EVR) in certain cell lines (14, 36). Recently, the type I interferon-induced host protein tetherin was identified as being responsible for this Vpu-modulated restriction (24, 38). In the absence of Vpu, tetherin causes particles to remain tethered (hence the name) to the host cell postfission. Although Vpu counteracts the function of tetherin, the exact mechanism has not been fully elucidated. However, the mechanism for tetherin antagonism appears to be distinct from that for modulating CD4. Mutation of the serines 52 and 56 of Vpu abolish CD4 degradation, but only reduce EVR activity (5, 17, 21, 32). Some EVR activity remains even when much of the Vpu cytoplasmic tail is deleted (30). In addition, many mutations in the membrane-spanning domain, such as Vpu_RD, do not affect CD4 degradation and yet completely abolish EVR activity (27, 30, 37). The critical residues in tetherin for recognition by Vpu appear to be in the membrane-spanning domain and not the cytoplasmic tail (9, 19, 28). Although β-TrCP is required for complete EVR activity, there is no consensus whether the degradation of tetherin is proteasome or lysosome mediated (5, 7, 21) or whether degradation is required at all. In some cases there can be some EVR activity in the absence of tetherin degradation (17, 22).We demonstrate here that Vpu is responsible for the incompatibility between HIV-1 and GaLV Env. Glycoproteins containing the cytoplasmic tail from GaLV Env are prevented from being incorporated into HIV-1 particles by Vpu, effectively reducing infectious particle production by 50- to 100-fold. The serines at positions 52 and 56 are required for this restriction, but the membrane-spanning domain is not. Although the mechanism for this restriction appears similar to CD4 degradation, there are apparent differences. Vpu does not prevent surface expression, and it does not prevent its incorporation into MLV particles. Therefore, the mechanism of restriction appears to involve a system that does not rely directly on global protein degradation.     

Analysis of the Viral Elements Required in the Nuclear Import of HIV-1 DNA

HIV-1 possesses an exquisite ability to infect cells independently from their cycling status by undergoing an active phase of nuclear import through the nuclear pore. This property has been ascribed to the presence of karyophilic elements present in viral nucleoprotein complexes, such as the matrix protein (MA); Vpr; the integrase (IN); and a cis-acting structure present in the newly synthesized DNA, the DNA flap. However, their role in nuclear import remains controversial at best. In the present study, we carried out a comprehensive analysis of the role of these elements in nuclear import in a comparison between several primary cell types, including stimulated lymphocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. We show that despite the fact that none of these elements is absolutely required for nuclear import, disruption of the central polypurine tract-central termination sequence (cPPT-CTS) clearly affects the kinetics of viral DNA entry into the nucleus. This effect is independent of the cell cycle status of the target cells and is observed in cycling as well as in nondividing primary cells, suggesting that nuclear import of viral DNA may occur similarly under both conditions. Nonetheless, this study indicates that other components are utilized along with the cPPT-CTS for an efficient entry of viral DNA into the nucleus.Lentiviruses display an exquisite ability to infect dividing and nondividing cells alike that is unequalled among Retroviridae. This property is thought to be due to the particular behavior or composition of the viral nucleoprotein complexes (NPCs) that are liberated into the cytoplasm of target cells upon virus-to-cell membrane fusion and that allow lentiviruses to traverse an intact nuclear membrane (17, 28, 29, 39, 52, 55, 67, 79). In the case of the human immunodeficiency type I virus (HIV-1), several studies over the years identified viral components of such structures with intrinsic karyophilic properties and thus perfect candidates for mediation of the passage of viral DNA (vDNA) through the nuclear pore: the matrix protein (MA); Vpr; the integrase (IN); and a three-stranded DNA flap, a structure present in neo-synthesized viral DNA, specified by the central polypurine tract-central termination sequence (cPPT-CTS). It is clear that these elements may mediate nuclear import directly or via the recruitment of the host''s proteins, and indeed, several cellular proteins have been found to influence HIV-1 infection during nuclear import, like the karyopherin α2 Rch1 (38); importin 7 (3, 30, 93); the transportin SR-2 (13, 20); or the nucleoporins Nup98 (27), Nup358/RANBP2, and Nup153 (13, 56).More recently, the capsid protein (CA), the main structural component of viral nucleoprotein complexes at least upon their cytoplasmic entry, has also been suggested to be involved in nuclear import or in postnuclear entry steps (14, 25, 74, 90, 92). Whether this is due to a role for CA in the shaping of viral nucleoprotein complexes or to a direct interaction between CA and proteins involved in nuclear import remains at present unknown.Despite a large number of reports, no single viral or cellular element has been described as absolutely necessary or sufficient to mediate lentiviral nuclear import, and important controversies as to the experimental evidences linking these elements to this step exist. For example, MA was among the first viral protein of HIV-1 described to be involved in nuclear import, and 2 transferable nuclear localization signals (NLSs) have been described to occur at its N and C termini (40). However, despite the fact that early studies indicated that the mutation of these NLSs perturbed HIV-1 nuclear import and infection specifically in nondividing cells, such as macrophages (86), these findings failed to be confirmed in more-recent studies (23, 33, 34, 57, 65, 75).Similarly, Vpr has been implicated by several studies of the nuclear import of HIV-1 DNA (1, 10, 21, 43, 45, 47, 64, 69, 72, 73, 85). Vpr does not possess classical NLSs, yet it displays a transferable nucleophilic activity when fused to heterologous proteins (49-51, 53, 77, 81) and has been shown to line onto the nuclear envelope (32, 36, 47, 51, 58), where it can truly facilitate the passage of the viral genome into the nucleus. However, the role of Vpr in this step remains controversial, as in some instances Vpr is not even required for viral replication in nondividing cells (1, 59).Conflicting results concerning the role of IN during HIV-1 nuclear import also exist. Indeed, several transferable NLSs have been described to occur in the catalytic core and the C-terminal DNA binding domains of IN, but for some of these, initial reports of nuclear entry defects (2, 9, 22, 46, 71) were later shown to result from defects at steps other than nuclear import (60, 62, 70, 83). These reports do not exclude a role for the remaining NLSs in IN during nuclear import, and they do not exclude the possibility that IN may mediate this step by associating with components of the cellular nuclear import machinery, such as importin alpha and beta (41), importin 7 (3, 30, 93, 98), and, more recently, transportin-SR2 (20).The central DNA flap, a structure present in lentiviruses and in at least 1 yeast retroelement (44), but not in other orthoretroviruses, has also been involved in the nuclear import of viral DNA (4, 6, 7, 31, 78, 84, 95, 96), and more recently, it has been proposed to provide a signal for viral nucleoprotein complexes uncoating in the proximity of the nuclear pore, with the consequence of providing a signal for import (8). However, various studies showed an absence or weakness of nuclear entry defects in viruses devoid of the DNA flap (24, 26, 44, 61).Overall, the importance of viral factors in HIV-1 nuclear import is still unclear. The discrepancies concerning the role of MA, IN, Vpr, and cPPT-CTS in HIV-1 nuclear import could in part be explained by their possible redundancy. To date, only one comprehensive study analyzed the role of these four viral potentially karyophilic elements together (91). This study showed that an HIV-1 chimera where these elements were either deleted or replaced by their murine leukemia virus (MLV) counterparts was, in spite of an important infectivity defect, still able to infect cycling and cell cycle-arrested cell lines to similar efficiencies. If this result indicated that the examined viral elements of HIV-1 were dispensable for the cell cycle independence of HIV, as infections proceeded equally in cycling and arrested cells, they did not prove that they were not required in nuclear import, because chimeras displayed a severe infectivity defect that precluded their comparison with the wild type (WT).Nuclear import and cell cycle independence may not be as simply linked as previously thought. On the one hand, there has been no formal demonstration that the passage through the nuclear pore, and thus nuclear import, is restricted to nondividing cells, and for what we know, this passage may be an obligatory step in HIV infection in all cells, irrespective of their cycling status. In support of this possibility, certain mutations in viral elements of HIV affect nuclear import in dividing as well as in nondividing cells (4, 6, 7, 31, 84, 95). On the other hand, cell cycle-independent infection may be a complex phenomenon that is made possible not only by the ability of viral DNA to traverse the nuclear membrane but also by its ability to cope with pre- and postnuclear entry events, as suggested by the phenotypes of certain CA mutants (74, 92).Given that the cellular environment plays an important role during the early steps of viral infection, we chose to analyze the role of the four karyophilic viral elements of HIV-1 during infection either alone or combined in a wide comparison between cells highly susceptible to infection and more-restrictive primary cell targets of HIV-1 in vivo, such as primary blood lymphocytes (PBLs), monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM), and dendritic cells (DCs).In this study, we show that an HIV-1-derived virus in which the 2 NLSs of MA are mutated and the IN, Vpr, and cPPT-CTS elements are removed displays no detectable nuclear import defect in HeLa cells independently of their cycling status. However, this mutant virus is partially impaired for nuclear entry in primary cells and more specifically in DCs and PBLs. We found that this partial defect is specified by the cPPT-CTS, while the 3 remaining elements seem to play no role in nuclear import. Thus, our study indicates that the central DNA flap specifies the most important role among the viral elements involved thus far in nuclear import. However, it also clearly indicates that the role played by the central DNA flap is not absolute and that its importance varies depending on the cell type, independently from the dividing status of the cell.     

Human Cytomegalovirus Exploits ESCRT Machinery in the Process of Virion Maturation

The endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) machinery controls the incorporation of cargo into intraluminal vesicles of multivesicular bodies. This machinery is used during envelopment of many RNA viruses and some DNA viruses, including herpes simplex virus type 1. Other viruses mature independent of ESCRT components, instead relying on the intrinsic behavior of viral matrix and envelope proteins to drive envelopment. Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) maturation has been reported to proceed independent of ESCRT components (A. Fraile-Ramos et al. Cell. Microbiol. 9:2955-2967, 2007). A virus complementation assay was used to evaluate the role of dominant-negative (DN) form of a key ESCRT ATPase, vacuolar protein sorting-4 (Vps4_DN) in HCMV replication. Vps4_DN specifically inhibited viral replication, whereas wild-type-Vps4 had no effect. In addition, a DN form of charged multivesicular body protein 1 (CHMP1_DN) was found to inhibit HCMV. In contrast, DN tumor susceptibility gene-101 (Tsg101_DN) did not impact viral replication despite the presence of a PTAP motif within pp150/ppUL32, an essential tegument protein involved in the last steps of viral maturation and release. Either Vps4_DN or CHMP1_DN blocked viral replication at a step after the accumulation of late viral proteins, suggesting that both are involved in maturation. Both Vps4A and CHMP1A localized in the vicinity of viral cytoplasmic assembly compartments, sites of viral maturation that develop in CMV-infected cells. Thus, ESCRT machinery is involved in the final steps of HCMV replication.Cellular endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) machinery controls the evolutionarily conserved process (33) of membrane budding that is normally a component of cytokinesis (6, 46), endosome sorting and multivesicular body (MVB) formation (28). After the initial characterization in retroviruses, many enveloped viruses have been shown to rely on this machinery during envelopment and release from cells (1, 18, 35, 40, 47, 69). Other viruses, such as influenza virus, mature independent of ESCRT machinery and are believed to use an alternative virus-intrinsic pathway (7). The core of the ESCRT machinery consists of five multiprotein complexes (ESCRT-0, -I, -II, and -III and Vps4-Vta1) (27). Vacuolar protein sorting-4 (Vps4) is a critical ATPase that functions downstream of most ESCRT components. Based on sensitivity to dominant-negative (DN) inhibitors of protein function, replication of several RNA viruses, as well as of the DNA virus herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) (5, 10), have been shown to rely on Vps4 in a manner that is analogous to the formation of MVBs (endosomal compartments containing intraluminal vesicles) (10, 45). Evidence based exclusively on small interfering RNA (siRNA) methods suggested cytomegalovirus (CMV) maturation was independent of ESCRT components, although the maturation of this virus remained MVB associated (16).ESCRT machinery facilitates envelopment and release at cytoplasmic membranes and recruits cargo for sorting via any of three alternative pathways that converge on a Vps4-dependent downstream step: (i) a tumor susceptibility gene-101 (Tsg101)-dependent pathway, (ii) an apoptosis linked gene-2 interacting protein X (ALIX)-dependent pathway, and (iii) a pathway that relies on a subset of Nedd4-like HECT E3 ubiquitin ligases (35). The involvement of ESCRT in viral envelopment and egress was first observed in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (18, 19, 40, 60) and has been extended to equine infectious anemia virus (34, 40, 52, 60), Rous sarcoma virus (29, 70, 71), Mason-Pfizer monkey virus (20, 72), rabies virus (24), Ebola virus (23), hepatitis B virus (68), vaccinia virus (25), HSV-1 (5, 10), and several other RNA and DNA viruses (7). Structural proteins in most of these viruses carry late (L) domains characterized by conserved amino acid motifs (PTAP, PPXY, and YXXL) that mediate protein-protein interactions and facilitate recruitment of ESCRT components to facilitate virus budding. The introduction of mutations in these motifs leads to defects in viral maturation and release from cells (40).Vps4 controls the release of ESCRT complexes from membranes (18, 40). Inhibition of Vps4A and Vps4B using Vps4A_DN reduces levels of viral maturation mediated by L domains (47). For this reason, inhibition by a Vps4_DN is considered the gold standard test to establish the role of ESCRT machinery in maturation of any virus (7). Tsg101, a component of ESCRT-I, normally functions to deliver ubiquitinated transmembrane proteins to MVBs (35). HIV-1 p6 Gag PTAP domain interacts with Tsg101 (18) and directs viral cores (capsids) to sites of viral envelopment (39). Upon disruption of HIV-1 PTAP domain, particle release becomes dependent on auxiliary factors, including an ALIX-binding YXXL domain within p6 Gag (60). A minimal amino-terminal L domain of Tsg101 functions as a DN inhibitor of PTAP-mediated viral budding without inhibiting Tsg101-independent PPXY- or YXXL-dependent pathways (40). The murine leukemia virus PPXY domain recruits a subset of Nedd4-like HECT E3 ubiquitin ligases (WWP1, WWP2, and Itch) (36) that in turn recruit ESCRT-III components (35). The YXXL L domain binds to the cellular protein ALIX (60). ALIX binds to Tsg101 (38) and also with ESCRT-III protein CHMP-4B (60), thus linking ESCRT-I and ESCRT-III. Green fluorescent protein (GFP)-, red fluorescent protein, or yellow fluorescent protein (YFP)-fused CHMPs are general DN inhibitors of all natural CHMP-associated activities and cause the formation of aberrant endosomal compartments that sequester ESCRT complexes (26, 31, 60). Through the use of these DN constructs, the recruitment and assembly of ESCRT components can be inhibited to specifically disrupt different steps of the ESCRT pathway.The best evidence supporting involvement of ESCRT machinery in the life cycle of herpesviruses comes from the inhibition of HSV-1 envelopment by Vps4_DN (10), as well as by CHMP3_DN (5), together with the association of HSV-1 maturation with MVB. It was recently reported that HHV-6 also induces MVB formation that controls viral egress via an exosomal release pathway (45). After losing primary envelope acquired at the nuclear membrane, Human CMV (HCMV) undergoes a secondary, or final, envelopment step within a cytoplasmic assembly compartments (AC) (59). Secondary envelopment is thought to occur within early endosomal compartments based on diverse observations: (i) purified virions and dense bodies have a lipid composition that is similar to this compartment (64); (ii) the AC of HCMV-infected fibroblasts contain endosomal markers (11); and (iii) a number of HCMV envelope proteins, including US28 (14), UL33, US27 (15), and gB (9), colocalize with endosomal markers in infected cells. A model of HCMV egress via early endosomes has been proposed (11).The approach that we have used here employed human foreskin fibroblasts (HFs) and restricted viral replication to cells that expressed the DN or wild-type (WT) component of the ESCRT pathway by including a requirement that transfected cells complement replication of virus. Confirming expression of both DN and complementing protein in transfected cells by epifluorescence microscopy ensured that an overwhelming majority of cells coexpressed these proteins. The results were scored as inhibition of viral spread to adjacent cells as well as demonstration of late gene expression in the transfected and/or infected cell. Viral progeny is released within 48 to 72 h from CMV-infected cells (44), reducing the likelihood that nonspecific or long-term toxicity of DN-ESCRT proteins would impact our analysis. This assay has been effectively used earlier for both immediate-early gene (54) and late gene (2, 62) mutants, and similar complementation assay results have been reported in diverse systems (8, 49, 73). This assay further provided an opportunity to determine when inhibition occurred relative to the viral replication cycle. Our data implicate ESCRT machinery late during HCMV maturation, which is consistent with a role in secondary envelopment and release.     

The Silencing Domain of GW182 Interacts with PABPC1 To Promote Translational Repression and Degradation of MicroRNA Targets and Is Required for Target Release

GW182 family proteins are essential in animal cells for microRNA (miRNA)-mediated gene silencing, yet the molecular mechanism that allows GW182 to promote translational repression and mRNA decay remains largely unknown. Previous studies showed that while the GW182 N-terminal domain interacts with Argonaute proteins, translational repression and degradation of miRNA targets are promoted by a bipartite silencing domain comprising the GW182 middle and C-terminal regions. Here we show that the GW182 C-terminal region is required for GW182 to release silenced mRNPs; moreover, GW182 dissociates from miRNA targets at a step of silencing downstream of deadenylation, indicating that GW182 is required to initiate but not to maintain silencing. In addition, we show that the GW182 bipartite silencing domain competes with eukaryotic initiation factor 4G for binding to PABPC1. The GW182-PABPC1 interaction is also required for miRNA target degradation; accordingly, we observed that PABPC1 associates with components of the CCR4-NOT deadenylase complex. Finally, we show that PABPC1 overexpression suppresses the silencing of miRNA targets. We propose a model in which the GW182 silencing domain promotes translational repression, at least in part, by interfering with mRNA circularization and also recruits the deadenylase complex through the interaction with PABPC1.In multicellular eukaryotes, the regulation of gene expression by microRNAs (miRNAs) is critical for biological processes as diverse as cell differentiation and proliferation, apoptosis, metabolism, and development (4). To exert a regulatory function, miRNAs associate with Argonaute proteins to form RNA-induced silencing complexes, which repress translation and trigger the degradation of target mRNAs (4, 10, 16). The extent to which translational repression and degradation contribute to silencing depends on the specific target-miRNA combination; some targets are regulated predominantly at the translational level, whereas others can be regulated mainly at the mRNA level (3). A large-scale proteomic analysis performed in parallel with measurements of mRNA levels showed that for the vast majority of miRNA targets, silencing correlates with changes at both the protein and mRNA levels (1, 27).In animal cells, the degradation of miRNA targets is initiated by deadenylation and decapping, which are followed by the exonucleolytic decay of the mRNA body (2, 3, 9, 11, 12, 17, 19, 24, 30, 31). miRNA-dependent mRNA degradation requires a variety of proteins: an Argonaute and a GW182 protein, the CCR4-NOT deadenylase complex, the decapping enzyme DCP2, and several decapping activators including DCP1, Ge-1, HPat, EDC3, and Me31B (also known as RCK/p54) (3, 6, 9, 12, 19). Several studies previously demonstrated that miRNAs trigger deadenylation and decapping even when the mRNA target is not translated (9, 12, 19, 24, 30, 31), indicating that mRNA decay is not merely a consequence of a primary effect of miRNAs on translation but rather is an independent mechanism by which miRNAs silence gene expression.Although how miRNAs trigger mRNA degradation is well established, the mechanisms driving the inhibition of translation are unclear. Multiple mechanisms have been proposed: the displacement of eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) from the mRNA cap structure, interference with the function of the eIF4F complex, a block of 60S ribosomal subunit joining, or an inhibition of translation elongation (4, 10, 16). Regardless of the precise mechanism, the translational repression of miRNA targets also requires GW182 family proteins (11, 13).GW182 proteins are essential components of the miRNA pathway in animal cells, as their depletion suppresses miRNA-mediated gene silencing (reviewed in references 8 and 13). Recent studies have revealed that the silencing activity of these proteins resides predominantly in a bipartite silencing domain containing the middle and C-terminal regions (14, 22, 33). The precise molecular function of the GW182 silencing domain is not fully understood, yet it is known that the domain is not required for GW182 proteins to interact with Argonaute proteins or to localize to P bodies (3, 14, 22). Furthermore, when the silencing domains of GW182 proteins are artificially tethered to mRNAs, their expression is silenced; therefore, tethering bypasses the requirement for Argonaute proteins and miRNAs (5, 22, 33). These observations suggest that the silencing domains of GW182 proteins exhibit intrinsic silencing activity and therefore likely play a role at the effector step of silencing (13, 14, 22, 33).Here we investigate what role the Drosophila melanogaster GW182 silencing domain plays in the miRNA pathway. Overall, our results reveal that the very C-terminal region of this domain is required for the release of GW182 from silenced mRNPs. Indeed, we unexpectedly found that we could detect D. melanogaster GW182 bound to miRNA targets only in cells depleted of components of the deadenylase complex. These results suggest that GW182 dissociates from Argonaute-1 (AGO1) and miRNA targets at a step of silencing downstream of deadenylation. In contrast, GW182 mutants lacking the C-terminal region remain stably bound to miRNA targets, even in wild-type cells, indicating that this region plays a role in the dissociation of GW182 from effector complexes. We further show that the bipartite silencing domain of GW182 interacts with PABPC1 and interferes with the binding of PABPC1 to eIF4G. The interaction of GW182 with PABPC1 is also required for the degradation of miRNA targets, most likely because the interaction facilitates the recruitment of the CCR4-NOT deadenylase complex. Accordingly, overexpressing PABPC1 suppresses the silencing of miRNA targets. Our findings uncover an unexpected role for PABPC1 in the miRNA pathway.