The synergistic inhibition of breast cancer proliferation by combined treatment with 4EGI-1 and MK2206

Cap-dependent translation is a potential cancer-related target (oncotarget) due to its critical role in cancer initiation and progression. 4EGI-1, an inhibitor of eIF4E/eIF4G interaction, was discovered by screening chemical libraries of small molecules. 4EGI-1 inhibits cap-dependent translation initiation by impairing the assembly of the eIF4E/eIF4G complex, and therefore is a potential anti-cancer agent. Here, we report that 4EGI-1 also inhibits mTORC1 signaling independent of its inhibitory role on cap-dependent translation initiation. The inhibition of mTORC1 signaling by 4EGI-1 activates Akt due to both abrogation of the negative feedback loops from mTORC1 to PI3K and activation of mTORC2. We further validated that mTORC2 activity is required for 4EGI-1-mediated Akt activation. The activated Akt counteracted the anticancer effects of 4EGI-1. In support of this model, inhibition of Akt potentiates the antitumor activity of 4EGI-1 both in vitro and in a xenograft mouse model in vivo. Our results suggest that a combination of 4EGI-1and Akt inhibitor is a rational approach for the treatment of cancer.     

The synergistic inhibition of breast cancer proliferation by combined treatment with 4EGI-1 and MK2206

Cap-dependent translation is a potential cancer-related target (oncotarget) due to its critical role in cancer initiation and progression. 4EGI-1, an inhibitor of eIF4E/eIF4G interaction, was discovered by screening chemical libraries of small molecules. 4EGI-1 inhibits cap-dependent translation initiation by impairing the assembly of the eIF4E/eIF4G complex, and therefore is a potential anti-cancer agent. Here, we report that 4EGI-1 also inhibits mTORC1 signaling independent of its inhibitory role on cap-dependent translation initiation. The inhibition of mTORC1 signaling by 4EGI-1 activates Akt due to both abrogation of the negative feedback loops from mTORC1 to PI3K and activation of mTORC2. We further validated that mTORC2 activity is required for 4EGI-1-mediated Akt activation. The activated Akt counteracted the anticancer effects of 4EGI-1. In support of this model, inhibition of Akt potentiates the antitumor activity of 4EGI-1 both in vitro and in a xenograft mouse model in vivo. Our results suggest that a combination of 4EGI-1and Akt inhibitor is a rational approach for the treatment of cancer.     

Translational control and cancer therapy

Our recent findings on Rheb and eIF4E address key questions of translational control in cancer and have implications for tumor therapy 1. Briefly, we find that Rheb a proximal activator of mTORC1 and protein translation can cooperate with c-Myc in tumorigenesis in vivo in a manner resembling Akt or the oncogenic eIF4E translation initiation factor. Rheb is highly expressed in some human lymphomas as well as other cancers and likely contributes to malignancies in different tissues 2. The cancer-relevant activities emanating from increased Rheb depend on activation of mTORC1 and are sensitive to rapamycin. Moreover,farnesyltransferase inhibitors (FTIs) can directly block Rheb activity and this is responsible for the therapeutic effect of these drugs in certain tumors. We will discuss here how translational control mechanisms contribute to oncogenesis and speculate on the potential and limitations of targeting these co-operating oncogenic events for therapy.     

Role of p70S6K1-mediated Phosphorylation of eIF4B and PDCD4 Proteins in the Regulation of Protein Synthesis

Modulation of mRNA binding to the 40 S ribosomal subunit during translation initiation controls not only global rates of protein synthesis but also regulates the pattern of protein expression by allowing for selective inclusion, or exclusion, of mRNAs encoding particular proteins from polysomes. The mRNA binding step is modulated by signaling through a protein kinase known as the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1). mTORC1 directly phosphorylates the translational repressors eIF4E binding proteins (4E-BP) 1 and 2, releasing them from the mRNA cap binding protein eIF4E, thereby promoting assembly of the eIF4E·eIF4G complex. mTORC1 also phosphorylates the 70-kDa ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 (p70S6K1), which subsequently phosphorylates eIF4B, and programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4), which sequesters eIF4A from the eIF4E·eIF4G complex, resulting in repressed translation of mRNAs with highly structured 5′-untranslated regions. In the present study, we compared the role of the 4E-BPs in the regulation of global rates of protein synthesis to that of eIF4B and PDCD4. We found that maintenance of eIF4E interaction with eIF4G was not by itself sufficient to sustain global rates of protein synthesis in the absence of mTORC1 signaling to p70S6K1; phosphorylation of both eIF4B and PDCD4 was additionally required. We also found that the interaction of eIF4E with eIF4G was maintained in the liver of fasted rats as well as in serum-deprived mouse embryo fibroblasts lacking both 4E-BP1 and 4E-BP2, suggesting that the interaction of eIF4G with eIF4E is controlled primarily through the 4E-BPs.     

Activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 is both necessary and sufficient to stimulate eukaryotic initiation factor 2Bvarepsilon mRNA translation and protein synthesis

In a previous study we demonstrated a requirement for activation of mTORC1 in the stimulation of eIF2Bepsilon mRNA translation in skeletal muscle in response to resistance exercise. Although that study established the necessity of mTORC1 activation, the experimental model used did not lend itself readily to address the question of whether or not mTORC1 activation was sufficient to produce the response. Therefore, the present study was designed to address the sufficiency of mTORC1 activation, using cultures of Rat2 fibroblasts in which mTORC1 signaling was repressed by serum/leucine-depletion and stimulated by repletion of leucine and/or IGF-1. Repletion with leucine and IGF-1 caused a shift of eIF2Bepsilon mRNA into actively translating polysomes and a stimulation of new eIF2Bepsilon protein synthesis, but had no effect on mRNAs encoding the other four eIF2B subunits. Stimulation of eIF2Bepsilon translation was reversed by pre-treatment with the mTORC1 inhibitor rapamycin. Exogenous overexpression of FLAG-Rheb, a proximal activator of mTORC1, also caused a re-distribution of eIF2Bepsilon mRNA into polysomes and a stimulation of eIF2Bepsilon protein synthesis. The stimulation of eIF2Bepsilon mRNA translation occurred in the absence of any effect on eIF2Bepsilon mRNA abundance. RNAi-mediated knockdown of eIF2Bepsilon resulted in reduced cellular proliferation, a result that phenocopied the known cytostatic effect of mTORC1 repression. Overall the results demonstrate that activation of mTORC1 is both necessary and sufficient to stimulate eIF2Bepsilon mRNA translation and that this response may represent a novel mechanism through which mTORC1 can affect mRNA translation initiation, rates of protein synthesis, and cellular growth/proliferation.     

Raptor-rictor axis in TGFbeta-induced protein synthesis

Transforming growth factor-beta (TGFbeta) stimulates pathological renal cell hypertrophy for which increased protein synthesis is critical. The mechanism of TGFbeta-induced protein synthesis is not known, but PI 3 kinase-dependent Akt kinase activity is necessary. We investigated the contribution of downstream effectors of Akt in TGFbeta-stimulated protein synthesis. TGFbeta increased inactivating phosphorylation of Akt substrate tuberin in a PI 3 kinase/Akt dependent manner, resulting in activation of mTOR kinase. mTOR activity increased phosphorylation of S6 kinase and the translation repressor 4EBP-1, which were sensitive to inhibition of both PI 3 kinase and Akt. mTOR inhibitor rapamycin and a dominant negative mutant of mTOR suppressed TGFbeta-induced phosphorylation of S6 kinase and 4EBP-1. PI 3 kinase/Akt and mTOR regulated dissociation of 4EBP-1 from eIF4E to make the latter available for binding to eIF4G. mTOR and 4EBP-1 modulated TGFbeta-induced protein synthesis. mTOR is present in two multi protein complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2. Raptor and rictor are part of mTORC1 and mTORC2, respectively. shRNA-mediated downregulation of raptor inhibited TGFbeta-stimulated mTOR kinase activity, resulting in inhibition of phosphorylation of S6 kinase and 4EBP-1. Raptor shRNA also prevented protein synthesis in response to TGFbeta. Downregulation of rictor inhibited serine 473 phosphorylation of Akt without any effect on phosphorylation of its substrate, tuberin. Furthermore, rictor shRNA increased phosphorylation of S6 kinase and 4EBP-1 in TGFbeta-independent manner, resulting in increased protein synthesis. Thus mTORC1 function is essential for TGFbeta-induced protein synthesis. Our data also provide novel evidence that rictor negatively regulates TORC1 activity to control basal protein synthesis, thus conferring tight control on cellular hypertrophy.     

Mitotic Raptor Promotes mTORC1 Activity,G2/M Cell Cycle Progression,and Internal Ribosome Entry Site-Mediated mRNA Translation

The mTOR signaling complex integrates signals from growth factors and nutrient availability to control cell growth and proliferation, in part through effects on the protein-synthetic machinery. Protein synthesis rates fluctuate throughout the cell cycle but diminish significantly during the G₂/M transition. The fate of the mTOR complex and its role in coordinating cell growth and proliferation signals with protein synthesis during mitosis remain unknown. Here we demonstrate that the mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) pathway, which stimulates protein synthesis, is actually hyperactive during mitosis despite decreased protein synthesis and reduced activity of mTORC1 upstream activators. We describe previously unknown G₂/M-specific phosphorylation of a component of mTORC1, the protein raptor, and demonstrate that mitotic raptor phosphorylation alters mTORC1 function during mitosis. Phosphopeptide mapping and mutational analysis demonstrate that mitotic phosphorylation of raptor facilitates cell cycle transit through G₂/M. Phosphorylation-deficient mutants of raptor cause cells to delay in G₂/M, whereas depletion of raptor causes cells to accumulate in G₁. We identify cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (cdk1 [cdc2]) and glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) pathways as two probable mitosis-regulated protein kinase pathways involved in mitosis-specific raptor phosphorylation and altered mTORC1 activity. In addition, mitotic raptor promotes translation by internal ribosome entry sites (IRES) on mRNA during mitosis and is demonstrated to be associated with rapamycin resistance. These data suggest that this pathway may play a role in increased IRES-dependent mRNA translation during mitosis and in rapamycin insensitivity.Cell growth and cell division are tightly coordinated processes required for cells to remain equal in size after division. In unicellular organisms, cell growth and proliferation are coordinated by nutrient availability, whereas their multicellular counterparts must also respond to growth factor input. Both processes lead to organismal growth as well as to increased cell number and cell mass. Cell growth and cell proliferation are also linked via the mTOR signaling pathway (16, 17). The mTOR kinase forms a distinct signaling complex (mTORC1) that participates in the coordination of nutrient and growth factor signaling. mTORC1 is composed of the kinase mTOR, the adaptor protein raptor, and the regulatory protein LST8 (25, 33, 34, 72).Accumulation of cellular proteins leads to cell growth and cell division. However, cell growth occurs only during certain phases of the cell cycle, necessitating that protein synthesis rates oscillate during cell cycling (40). In addition, in quiescent cells in G₀, protein synthesis rates are significantly reduced, whereas a select group of mRNAs maintain active translation (20, 68). During the G₁ phase, overall protein synthesis rates increase through S phase to allow cells to grow and enter another round of cell division while maintaining cell size (2, 3, 42, 45). As with G₀, entrance into mitosis (G₂/M phase) results in a global downregulation by as much as 60 to 80% of cap-dependent mRNA translation in primary, immortalized, and some transformed cells (5, 14, 29).Studies report several possible mechanisms for inhibition of protein synthesis during mitosis. Translation initiation requires the formation of an initiation factor complex known as eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4F (eIF4F), which consists of cap binding protein eIF4E, molecular scaffold protein eIF4G, and RNA helicase eIF4A. Together, they recruit ribosomes to mRNAs via bridging interactions between the 7-methyl-GTP (m⁷GTP) 5′ cap and the small 40S ribosomal subunit. Downregulation of protein synthesis during G₂/M was first ascribed to hypophosphorylation of eIF4E and the eIF4E binding proteins (4E-BPs) (5, 46). 4E-BPs are activated by hypophosphorylation, which allows them to bind and sequester eIF4E, preventing it from binding eIF4G and thereby blocking cap-dependent mRNA translation. More recently, several studies suggest that 4E-BP1, the major 4E-BP and a key target of mTORC1, is actually hyperphosphorylated (inactivated) during mitosis (26, 49). It is puzzling, then, that the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT network and AKT itself (which modulate mTORC1 activity) are reportedly inactivated during late mitosis (1, 9, 22). In addition, phosphorylation of another mTORC1 target, ribosomal S6 kinase 1 (S6K1), and its activity are actually highest during G₂/M phase, consistent with elevated mTORC1 activity during mitosis (6).In this study we show that, despite repression of AKT and other activators of mTORC1 activity in mitosis, mTORC1 remains active and phosphorylates 4E-BP1 and S6K1 during G₂/M. We describe the multisite phosphorylation of raptor during mitosis, and we identify seven mitosis-specific raptor phosphorylation sites. By developing phosphomimetic and phosphorylation-deficient mutants of raptor, we show that hyperphosphorylated raptor promotes cell cycle transit through G₂/M, whereas hypophosphorylated raptor promotes transit through G₁. Raptor phosphorylation is shown to involve kinase pathways that are known to be active during mitosis, including cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (cdk1 [cdc2]) and glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) pathways that are also upregulated in certain human cancers, including breast cancers. These and other findings disclose a novel regulatory network for mTORC1 that is active during mitosis, important for G₂/M progression and increased internal ribosome entry site (IRES)-dependent translation during mitosis, and indirectly associated with rapamycin resistance.     

DAP5 associates with eIF2β and eIF4AI to promote Internal Ribosome Entry Site driven translation

Initiation is a highly regulated rate-limiting step of mRNA translation. During cap-dependent translation, the cap-binding protein eIF4E recruits the mRNA to the ribosome. Specific elements in the 5′UTR of some mRNAs referred to as Internal Ribosome Entry Sites (IRESes) allow direct association of the mRNA with the ribosome without the requirement for eIF4E. Cap-independent initiation permits translation of a subset of cellular and viral mRNAs under conditions wherein cap-dependent translation is inhibited, such as stress, mitosis and viral infection. DAP5 is an eIF4G homolog that has been proposed to regulate both cap-dependent and cap-independent translation. Herein, we demonstrate that DAP5 associates with eIF2β and eIF4AI to stimulate IRES-dependent translation of cellular mRNAs. In contrast, DAP5 is dispensable for cap-dependent translation. These findings provide the first mechanistic insights into the function of DAP5 as a selective regulator of cap-independent translation.     

Relieving autophagy and 4EBP1 from rapamycin resistance

The mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) is a multiprotein signaling complex regulated by oncogenes and tumor suppressors. Outputs downstream of mTORC1 include ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 (S6K1), eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E), and autophagy, and their modulation leads to changes in cell growth, proliferation, and metabolism. Rapamycin, an allosteric mTORC1 inhibitor, does not antagonize equally these outputs, but the reason for this is unknown. Here, we show that the ability of rapamycin to activate autophagy in different cell lines correlates with mTORC1 stability. Rapamycin exposure destabilizes mTORC1, but in cell lines where autophagy is drug insensitive, higher levels of mTOR-bound raptor are detected than in cells where rapamycin stimulates autophagy. Using small interfering RNA (siRNA), we find that knockdown of raptor relieves autophagy and the eIF4E effector pathway from rapamycin resistance. Importantly, nonefficacious concentrations of an ATP-competitive mTOR inhibitor can be combined with rapamycin to synergistically inhibit mTORC1 and activate autophagy but leave mTORC2 signaling intact. These data suggest that partial inhibition of mTORC1 by rapamycin can be overcome using combination strategies and offer a therapeutic avenue to achieve complete and selective inhibition of mTORC1.     

Inhibition of mammalian target of rapamycin induces phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent and Mnk-mediated eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E phosphorylation

The initiation factor eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) plays a critical role in initiating translation of mRNAs, including those encoding oncogenic proteins. Therefore, eIF4E is considered a survival protein involved in cell cycle progression, cell transformation, and apoptotic resistance. Phosphorylation of eIF4E (usually at Ser209) increases its binding affinity for the cap of mRNA and may also favor its entry into initiation complexes. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors suppress cap-dependent translation through inhibition of the phosphorylation of eIF4E-binding protein 1. Paradoxically, we have shown that inhibition of mTOR signaling increases eIF4E phosphorylation in human cancer cells. In this study, we focused on revealing the mechanism by which mTOR inhibition increases eIF4E phosphorylation. Silencing of either mTOR or raptor could mimic mTOR inhibitors' effects to increase eIF4E phosphorylation. Moreover, knockdown of mTOR, but not rictor or p70S6K, abrogated rapamycin's ability to increase eIF4E phosphorylation. These results indicate that mTOR inhibitor-induced eIF4E phosphorylation is secondary to mTOR/raptor inhibition and independent of p70S6K. Importantly, mTOR inhibitors lost their ability to increase eIF4E phosphorylation only in cells where both Mnk1 and Mnk2 were knocked out, indicating that mTOR inhibitors increase eIF4E phosphorylation through a Mnk-dependent mechanism. Given that mTOR inhibitors failed to increase Mnk and eIF4E phosphorylation in phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-deficient cells, we conclude that mTOR inhibition increases eIF4E phosphorylation through a PI3K-dependent and Mnk-mediated mechanism. In addition, we also suggest an effective therapeutic strategy for enhancing mTOR-targeted cancer therapy by cotargeting mTOR signaling and Mnk/eIF4E phosphorylation.     

Translational control of the abundance of cytoplasmic poly(A) binding protein in human cytomegalovirus-infected cells

Irrespective of their effects on ongoing host protein synthesis, productive replication of the representative alphaherpesvirus herpes simplex virus type 1, the representative gammaherpesvirus Kaposi's sarcoma herpesvirus, and the representative betaherpesvirus human cytomegalovirus [HCMV] stimulates the assembly of the multisubunit, cap-binding translation factor eIF4F. However, only HCMV replication is associated with an increased abundance of eIF4F core components (eIF4E, eIF4G, eIF4A) and the eIF4F-associated factor poly(A) binding protein (PABP). Here, we demonstrate that the increase in translation factor concentration was readily detected in an asynchronous population of HCMV-infected primary human fibroblasts, abolished by prior UV inactivation of virus, and genetically dependent upon viral immediate-early genes. Strikingly, while increased mRNA steady-state levels accompanied the rise in eIF4E and eIF4G protein levels, the overall abundance of PABP mRNA, together with the half-life of the polypeptide it encodes, remained relatively unchanged by HCMV infection. Instead, HCMV-induced PABP accumulation resulted from new protein synthesis and was sensitive to the mTORC1-selective inhibitor rapamycin, which interferes with phosphorylation of the mTORC1 substrate p70 S6K and the translational repressor 4E-BP1. While virus-induced PABP accumulation did not require p70 S6K, it was inhibited by the expression of a dominant-acting 4E-BP1 variant unable to be inactivated by mTORC1. Finally, unlike the situation in alpha- or gammaherpesvirus-infected cells, where PABP is redistributed to nuclei, PABP accumulated in the cytoplasm of HCMV-infected cells. Thus, cytoplasmic PABP accumulation is translationally controlled in HCMV-infected cells via a mechanism requiring mTORC1-mediated inhibition of the cellular 4E-BP1 translational repressor.     

The antiviral drug ribavirin does not mimic the 7-methylguanosine moiety of the mRNA cap structure in vitro

The eukaryotic initiation factor eIF4E binds the mRNA 5' cap structure and has a central role during translational initiation. eIF4E and the mechanisms to control its activity have oncogenic properties and thus have become targets for anticancer drug development. A recent study (Kentsis et al. 2004) presented evidence that the antiviral nucleoside ribavirin and its phosphorylated derivatives were structural mimics of the mRNA cap, high-affinity ligands for eIF4E, and potent repressors of eIF4E-mediated cell transformation and tumor growth. Based on these findings, we tested ribavirin, ribavirin triphosphate (RTP), and the dinucleotide RpppG for their ability to inhibit translation in vitro. Surprisingly, the ribavirin-based compounds did not affect translation at concentrations where canonical cap analogs efficiently block cap-dependent translation. Using a set of reporter mRNAs that are translated via either cap-dependent or viral internal ribosome entry sites (IRES)-dependent initiation, we found that these ribavirin-containing compounds did inhibit translation at high (millimolar) concentrations, but there was no correlation of this inhibition with an eIF4E requirement for translation. The addition of a ribavirin-containing cap to mRNA did not stimulate translation. Fluorescence titration experiments with eIF4E and the nuclear cap-binding complex CBC indicated affinities for RTP and RpppG that were two to four orders of magnitude lower than those of m(7)GTP and m(7)GpppG. We conclude that, at least with respect to translation, ribavirin does not act in vitro as a functional mimic of the mRNA cap.     

Phosphorylation of Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4E and Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4E-binding Protein (4EBP) and Their Upstream Signaling Components Undergo Diurnal Oscillation in the Mouse Hippocampus: IMPLICATIONS FOR MEMORY PERSISTENCE*

Translation of mRNA plays a critical role in consolidation of long-term memory. Here, we report that markers of initiation of mRNA translation are activated during training for contextual memory and that they undergo diurnal oscillation in the mouse hippocampus with maximal activity observed during the daytime (zeitgeber time 4–8 h). Phosphorylation and activation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E), eIF4E-binding protein 1 (4EBP1), ribosomal protein S6, and eIF4F cap-complex formation, all of which are markers for translation initiation, were higher in the hippocampus during the daytime compared with night. The circadian oscillation in markers of mRNA translation was lost in memory-deficient transgenic mice lacking calmodulin-stimulated adenylyl cyclases. Moreover, disruption of the circadian rhythm blocked diurnal oscillations in eIF4E, 4EBP1, rpS6, Akt, and ERK1/2 phosphorylation and impaired memory consolidation. Furthermore, repeated inhibition of translation in the hippocampus 48 h after contextual training with the protein synthesis inhibitor anisomycin impaired memory persistence. We conclude that repeated activation of markers of translation initiation in hippocampus during the circadian cycle might be critical for memory persistence.     

An efficient mammalian cell-free translation system supplemented with translation factors

Development of an efficient cell-free translation system from mammalian cells is an important goal. We examined whether supplementation of HeLa cell extracts with any translation initiation factor or translational regulator could enhance protein synthesis. eIF2 (eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2) and eIF2B augmented translation of capped, uncapped and encephalomyocarditis virus-internal ribosome entry site-promoted mRNAs. eIF4E specifically stimulated capped mRNA translation, while p97, a homologue to the C-terminal two-thirds of eIF4G, increased uncapped mRNA translation. When the HeLa cell extract was supplemented with a combination of eIF2, eIF2B, and p97, the capacity to synthesize a protein from an uncapped mRNA became comparable to that from the capped counterpart stimulated with a combination of eIF2, eIF2B, and eIF4E. A dialysis method rendered the HeLa cell extract capable of synthesizing proteins for 36h, and the yield was augmented when supplemented with initiation factors. In contrast, the productivity of a rabbit reticulocyte lysate was not enhanced by this method. Collectively, the translation factor-supplemented HeLa cell extract should become an important tool for the production of recombinant proteins.     

Eukaryotic translation initiation is controlled by cooperativity effects within ternary complexes of 4E-BP1, eIF4E,and the mRNA 5′ cap

Initiation is the rate-limiting step during mRNA 5′ cap-dependent translation, and thus a target of a strict control in the eukaryotic cell. It is shown here by analytical ultracentrifugation and fluorescence spectroscopy that the affinity of the human translation inhibitor, eIF4E-binding protein (4E-BP1), to the translation initiation factor 4E is significantly higher when eIF4E is bound to the cap. The 4E-BP1 binding stabilizes the active eIF4E conformation and, on the other hand, can facilitate dissociation of eIF4E from the cap. These findings reveal the particular allosteric effects forming a thermodynamic cycle for the cooperative regulation of the translation initiation inhibition.     

Structural basis for competitive inhibition of eIF4G-Mnk1 interaction by the adenovirus 100-kilodalton protein

Translation of most cellular mRNAs involves cap binding by the translation initiation complex. Among this complex of proteins are cap-binding protein eIF4E and the eIF4E kinase Mnk1. Cap-dependent mRNA translation generally correlates with Mnk1 phosphorylation of eIF4E when both are bound to eIF4G. During the late phase of adenovirus (Ad) infection translation of cellular mRNA is inhibited, which correlates with displacement of Mnk1 from eIF4G by the viral 100-kDa (100K) protein and dephosphorylation of eIF4E. Here we describe the molecular mechanism for 100K protein displacement of Mnk1 from eIF4G and elucidate a structural basis for eIF4G interaction with Mnk1 and 100K proteins and Ad inhibition of cellular protein synthesis. The eIF4G-binding site is located in an N-terminal 66-amino-acid peptide of 100K which is sufficient to bind eIF4G, displace Mnk1, block eIF4E phosphorylation, and inhibit eIF4F (cap)-dependent cellular mRNA translation. Ad 100K and Mnk1 proteins possess a common eIF4G-binding motif, but 100K protein binds more strongly to eIF4G than does Mnk1. Unlike Mnk1, for which binding to eIF4G is RNA dependent, competitive binding by 100K protein is RNA independent. These data support a model whereby 100K protein blocks cellular protein synthesis by coopting eIF4G and cap-initiation complexes regardless of their association with mRNA and displacing or blocking binding by Mnk1, which occurs only on preassembled complexes, resulting in dephosphorylation of eIF4E.