Statins inhibit in vitro calcification of human vascular smooth muscle cells induced by inflammatory mediators

Although lipid-lowering therapy with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) decreases the progression of coronary artery and aortic valve calcification, the mechanism of action of these drugs to inhibit the calcification process remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the effect of statins such as cerivastatin and atorvastatin on vascular calcification by utilizing an in vitro model of inflammatory vascular calcification. Cerivastatin and atorvastatin dose-dependently inhibited in vitro calcification of human vascular smooth muscle cells (HVSMCs) induced by the following inflammatory mediators (IM): interferon-gamma, 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and oncostatin M. These statins also depressed expression of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) in HVSMCs induced by these factors. Mevalonate and geranylgeranylpyrophosphate reversed the inhibitory effect of cerivastatin on ALP expression in HVSMCs, while farnesylpyrophosphate showed no effect on the ALP activities inhibited by this drug, suggesting that inhibition of Rho and its downstream target, Rho kinase may mediate the inhibitory effect of cerivastatin. Cerivastatin prevented RhoA activation in HVSMCs induced by the IM. A specific inhibitor of Rho kinase (Y-27632) inhibited in vitro calcification and induction of ALP in HVSMCs. These findings provide a possible mechanism of statins to prevent the progression of calcification in inflammatory vascular diseases such as atherosclerosis and cardiac valvular calcification.     

Activity and substrate specificity of pyrimidine phosphorylases and their role in fluoropyrimidine sensitivity in colon cancer cell lines

Thymidine phosphorylase (TP) and uridine phosphorylase (UP) are often upregulated in solid tumors and catalyze the phosphorolysis of natural (deoxy)nucleosides and a wide variety of fluorinated pyrimidine nucleosides. Because the relative contribution of each of the two enzymes to these reactions is still largely unknown, we investigated the substrate specificity of TP and UP in colon cancer cells for the (fluoro)pyrimidine nucleosides thymidine (TdR), uridine (Urd), 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5'DFUR), and 5FU. Specific inhibitors of TP (TPI) and UP (BAU) were used to determine the contribution of each enzyme in relation to their cytotoxic effect. The high TP expressing Colo320TP1 cells were most sensitive to 5'DFUR and 5FU, with IC50 values of 1.4 and 0.2 microM, respectively, while SW948 and SW1398 were insensitive to 5'DFUR (IC50>150 microM for 5'DFUR). TPI and BAU only moderately affected sensitivity of Colo320, SW948, and SW1398, whereas TPI significantly increased IC(50) for 5'DFUR (50-fold) and 5FU (11-fold) in Colo320TP1 and BAU that in C26A (9-fold for 5'DFUR; p<0.01). In the epithelial skin cell line HaCaT both inhibitors were able to decrease sensitivity to 5'DFUR and 5FU separately. HaCaT might be a model for 5'DFUR toxicity. In the colon cancer cells 5'DFUR degradation varied from 0.4 to 50 nmol 5FU/h/10(6)cells, that of TdR from 0.3 to 103 nmol thymine/h/10(6)cells, that of Urd from 0.8 to 79 nmol uracil/h/10(6)cells, while conversion of 5FU to FUrd was from 0.3 to 46 nmol/h/10(6)cells. SW948 and SW1398 were about equally sensitive to 5'DFUR and 5FU, but SW1398 had higher phosphorylase activity (>65-fold) compared to SW948. In SW948 and HaCaT TPI and BAU inhibited TdR and Urd phosphorolysis (>80%), respectively. Both TP and UP contributed to the phosphorolysis of 5'DFUR and 5FU. In the presence of both inhibitors, still phosphorolysis of 5FU (>40%) was detected in the tumor and HaCaT cell lines, and remarkably, that of all four substrates in SW1398 cells. 5'DFUR phosphorolysis was also measured in situ, where Colo320TP1, SW1398, and HaCaT cells produced significant amounts 5FU from 5'DFUR (>10 nmol/24h/10(6)cells). In Colo320TP1 and in HaCaT cells TPI completely prevented 5FU production, but not in SW1398 cells, where BAU decreased this by 67% (p<0.01). High uracil and dUrd levels were detected in the medium. Uracil accumulation was heavily reduced in the presence of TPI for Colo320TP1 and HaCaT cells, whereas 5FU-induced dUrd production by these cell lines increased (p<0.01). In contrast, for SW1398 cells only BAU was able to reduce uracil levels, and dUrd production remained unchanged. In conclusion, overlapping substrate specificity was found for TP and UP in the cell lines, in which both enzymes were responsible for converting TdR and Urd, and 5'DFUR. 5'DFUR and 5FU were converted to their products in both the colon cancer cells and keratinocytes.     

Collateral resistance of a dideoxycytidine-resistant cell line to 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine.

Exposure of a human lymphocytic cell line, H9 cells, to 0.5 microM and 5.0 microM dideoxycytidine (ddC) resulted in isolation of ddC-resistant H9-ddC0.5w and H9-ddC5.0w cell lines. In addition, these cell lines were also resistant to azidothymidine and had reduced deoxycytidine kinase and thymidine kinase activities. We now show that these cell lines are 4-fold and 2000-fold collaterally resistant to 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FdUR), respectively, but not to 5-fluorouracil (FU). Biochemical evaluations show that, compared to the parental cells, the FdUR phosphorylation was reduced to 36.3% and 9.2% and the FdUMP levels were decreased to 48.1% and 1.2% in these cell lines. Taken together, the data suggest that ddC, an antiviral agent, is capable of inducing resistance to FdUR-a drug that is not its analog and which has a different metabolism, target site, and mechanism of action.     

Altered catalytic activity of and DNA cleavage by DNA topoisomerase II from human leukemic cells selected for resistance to VM-26

The simultaneous development of resistance to the cytotoxic effects of several classes of natural product anticancer drugs, after exposure to only one of these agents, is referred to as multiple drug resistance (MDR). At least two distinct mechanisms for MDR have been postulated: that associated with P-glycoprotein and that thought to be due to an alteration in DNA topoisomerase II activity (at-MDR). We describe studies with two sublines of human leukemic CCRF-CEM cells approximately 50-fold resistant (CEM/VM-1) and approximately 140-fold resistant (CEM/VM-1-5) to VM-26, a drug known to interfere with DNA topoisomerase II activity. Each of these lines is cross-resistant to other drugs known to affect topoisomerase II but not cross-resistant to vinblastine, an inhibitor of mitotic spindle formation. We found little difference in the amount of immunoreactive DNA topoisomerase II in 1.0 M NaCl nuclear extracts of the two resistant and parental cell lines. However, topoisomerase II in nuclear extracts of the resistant sublines is altered in both catalytic activity (unknotting) of and DNA cleavage by this enzyme. Also, the rate at which catenation occurs is 20-30-fold slower with the CEM/VM-1-5 preparations. The effect of VM-26 on both strand passing and DNA cleavage is inversely related to the degree of primary resistance of each cell line. Our data support the hypothesis that at-MDR is due to an alteration in topoisomerase II or in a factor modulating its activity.     

Potentiation of cell killing by inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in four rodent cell lines exposed to N-methyl-N-nitrosourea or UV light

The sensitivities (Do-values) of the cytotoxic effect of MNU on four rodent cell lines were: mouse L1210, 0.07 mM; rat Yoshida sarcoma, 0.52 mM; Chinese hamster V79A, 0.70 mM and the UV sensitive, X-ray sensitive V79/79, 0.35 mM. The abilities of maximum non-toxic doses of the poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, 5-methyl nicotinamide (5MeN), 3-methoxybenzamide (3MBA) and caffeine to potentiate this cytotoxicity and that of UV light in V79A and V79/79 was measured. The degree of potentiation (ratio Do without inhibitor/Do with inhibitor) was both agent and cell line dependent. In general the lymphoid cell lines L1210 and YS showed greater potentiation, up to 4-fold, than did the fibroblast lines V79A and V79/79. The use of inhibitors in pairs suggested that 5MeN and 3MBA affect one process whereas caffeine affects additional processes. The data provide further support for a role for poly(ADP-ribose) in DNA repair, but indicate that metabolic factors may modify the effectiveness of individual inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in different cell lines.     

Role of oxygen free radical formation in the mechanism of menogaril resistance in multidrug resistant tumor cells

The mechanisms of action and resistance to menogaril, a clinically active anthracycline antitumor drug, were evaluated in sensitive and doxorubicin-selected multidrug resistant human breast tumor (MCF-7) cell lines. While MCF-7/ADRR cells were highly resistant (250-500-fold) to doxorubicin, they displayed only marginal resistance (10-fold) to menogaril. In contrast to doxorubicin, the mechanism of resistance to menogaril in these cells does not involve differential inhibition of DNA synthesis as measured by thymidine incorporation. P-170-glycoprotein-dependent drug transport did not contribute to resistance as there was no difference in the accumulation and retention of menogaril by sensitive and resistant cell lines. However, there was a 2-fold decrease in oxygen free radical formation in the resistant cells, compared to sensitive cells, in the presence of menogaril. Since resistant cells contain 12-fold higher glutathione peroxidase activity than the parental sensitive cells, the detoxification of hydrogen peroxide may be responsible for the decreased free radical formation and thus, may play a role in the resistance to menogaril.     

Selective Protection by Uridine of Growth Inhibition by 5-Fluorouracil (5FU) Mediated by 5FU Incorporation into RNA,But Not the Thymidylate Synthase Mediated Growth Inhibition by 5FU-Leucovorin

Fluorouracil (5FU) acts by RNA-incorporation and inhibition of thymidylate synthase; the first action is counteracted by uridine, and the second is enhanced by leucovorin (LV). Growth inhibition of C26-10 colon cancer cells by 5FU was enhanced by LV and rescued by uridine, but 5FU-LV was only partially rescued by uridine. In WiDr cells, 5FU sensitivity was not enhanced by LV, while both 5FU and 5FU-LV were rescued by uridine. Intermediate trends were found in SW948 and HT29 cells. Uridine rescue in mice allowed 1.5-fold increase in 5FU dose, leading to 2-fold increase in the antitumor effect and thymidylate synthase inhibition in resistant Colon-26 tumors. In the sensitive Colon-26-10 tumor, uridine rescue decreased 5FU-RNA incorporation > 10-fold, without affecting the antitumor activity. The use of LV and uridine can differentiate between two mechanisms of action of 5FU.     

Selective protection by uridine of growth inhibition by 5-fluorouracil (5FU) mediated by 5FU incorporation into RNA, but not the thymidylate synthase mediated growth inhibition by 5FU-leucovorin

Fluorouracil (5FU) acts by RNA-incorporation and inhibition of thymidylate synthase; the first action is counteracted by uridine, and the second is enhanced by leucovorin (LV). Growth inhibition of C26-10 colon cancer cells by 5FU was enhanced by LV and rescued by uridine, but 5FU-LV was only partially rescued by uridine. In WiDr cells, 5FU sensitivity was not enhanced by LV, while both 5FU and 5FU-LV were rescued by uridine. Intermediate trends were found in SW948 and HT29 cells. Uridine rescue in mice allowed 1.5-fold increase in 5FU dose, leading to 2-fold increase in the antitumor effect and thymidylate synthase inhibition in resistant Colon-26 tumors. In the sensitive Colon-26-10 tumor, uridine rescue decreased 5FU-RNA incorporation > 10-fold, without affecting the antitumor activity. The use of LV and uridine can differentiate between two mechanisms of action of 5FU.     

Synthesis of various 5-alkoxymethyluracil analogues and structure-cytotoxic activity relationship study

A number of 5-alkoxymethyluracil analogues were synthesized to evaluate their cytotoxic activity. 5-Alkoxymethyluracil derivatives 1 were prepared via known nucleophilic substitution of 5-chloromethyluracil 5 and subsequently transformed to their corresponding nucleosides 2. All prepared compounds were submitted to cytotoxic activity testing against drug sensitive and drug resistant leukaemia cells and solid tumour derived cell lines. In addition, the cytotoxic activity of 5-alkoxymethyluracil analogues 1 and 2 was compared with the previously published 5-[alkoxy(4-nitrophenyl)methyl]uracil analogues 3 and 4. Extensive structure–cytotoxic activity relationship studies are reported.