Protein translation, 2008

The important role that regulation of protein translation plays in determining longevity in invertebrate organisms became widely appreciated in 2007, with the publication of several papers discussed in last year's review. During 2008, several studies have further strengthened the idea that regulation of translation is one component of a highly evolutionarily conserved pathway that modifies longevity. Importantly, studies published this year also began to provide insights into specific mechanisms by which altered mRNA translation does (and in some cases does not) slow aging in invertebrate model organisms.     

Protein translation, 2007

Translation of RNA to protein is essential for life. It should perhaps not be surprising, therefore, that appropriate regulation of translation plays a key role in determining longevity. This Hot Topic article discusses papers published in the last year related to the importance of translation and its regulation by signaling through the target of rapamycin kinase, in modulating aging and age-associated diseases.     

The Influence of Codon Usage,Protein Abundance,and Protein Stability on Protein Evolution Vary by Evolutionary Distance and the Type of Protein

The Protein Journal - In general, the evolutionary rate of proteins is not primarily related to protein and amino acid functions, and factors such as protein abundance, codon usage, and...     

Overexpression, Purification, and Characterization of Glutaminase-Interacting Protein, a PDZ-Domain Protein from Human Brain

A human brain cDNA clone coding for a novel PDZ-domain protein of 124 amino acids has been previously isolated in our laboratory. The protein was termed GIP (glutaminase-interacting protein) because it interacts with the C-terminal region of the human brain glutaminase L. Here we report the heterologous expression of GIP as a histidine-tagged fusion protein in Escherichia coli cells. The induction conditions (temperature and isopropyl beta-d-thiogalactopyranoside concentrations) were optimized in such a way that GIP accounted for about 20% of the total E. coli protein. A simple and rapid procedure for purification was developed, which yielded 17 mg of purified GIP per liter of bacterial cell culture. The apparent molecular mass of the protein by SDS-PAGE was 16 kDa, whereas in native form it was determined to be 28 kDa, which suggests dimer formation. The nature and integrity of the recombinant protein were verified by mass spectrometry analysis. The functionality of the GIP protein was tested with an in vitro activity assay: after being pulled down with glutathione S-transferase-glutaminase, GIP was revealed by Western blot using anti-GIP antibodies. Furthermore, the glutaminase activity in crude rat liver extracts was inhibited by the presence of recombinant purified GIP protein.     

YidC Protein,a Molecular Chaperone for LacY Protein Folding via the SecYEG Protein Machinery

To understand how YidC and SecYEG function together in membrane protein topogenesis, insertion and folding of the lactose permease of Escherichia coli (LacY), a 12-transmembrane helix protein LacY that catalyzes symport of a galactoside and an H⁺, was studied. Although both the SecYEG machinery and signal recognition particle are required for insertion of LacY into the membrane, YidC is not required for translocation of the six periplasmic loops in LacY. Rather, YidC acts as a chaperone, facilitating LacY folding. Upon YidC depletion, the conformation of LacY is perturbed, as judged by monoclonal antibody binding studies and by in vivo cross-linking between introduced Cys pairs. Disulfide cross-linking also demonstrates that YidC interacts with multiple transmembrane segments of LacY during membrane biogenesis. Moreover, YidC is strictly required for insertion of M13 procoat protein fused into the middle cytoplasmic loop of LacY. In contrast, the loops preceding and following the inserted procoat domain are dependent on SecYEG for insertion. These studies demonstrate close cooperation between the two complexes in membrane biogenesis and that YidC functions primarily as a foldase for LacY.     

类泛素蛋白--SUMO

SUMO(small ubiquitin-related modifier)是泛素(ubiquitin)类蛋白家族的重要成员之一。尽管SUMO的生化反应途径与泛素相似,但不像泛素那样诱导底物蛋白降解。SUMO化能够使蛋白质更加稳定,进而调节许多关键的细胞活动。现从分类、结构、生化途径和生物学功能等方面介绍SUMO及SUMO化过程。     

Protein compressibility, dynamics, and pressure

The relationship between the elastic and dynamic properties of native globular proteins is considered on the basis of a wide set of reported experimental data. The formation of a small cavity, capable of accommodating water, in the protein interior is associated with the elastic deformation, whose contribution to the free energy considerably exceeds the heat motion energy. Mechanically, the protein molecule is a highly nonlinear system. This means that its compressibility sharply decreases upon compression. The mechanical nonlinearity results in the following consequences related to the intramolecular dynamics of proteins: 1) The sign of the electrostriction effect in the protein matrix is opposite that observed in liquids-this is an additional indication that protein behaves like a solid particle. 2) The diffusion of an ion from the solvent to the interior of a protein should depend on pressure nonmonotonically: at low pressure diffusion is suppressed, while at high pressure it is enhanced. Such behavior is expected to display itself in any dynamic process depending on ion diffusion. Qualitative and quantitative expectations ensuing from the mechanical properties are concordant with the available experimental data on hydrogen exchange in native proteins at ambient and high pressure.     

Heterodimeric Capping Protein from Arabidopsis Is a Membrane-Associated,Actin-Binding Protein

The actin cytoskeleton is a major regulator of cell morphogenesis and responses to biotic and abiotic stimuli. The organization and activities of the cytoskeleton are choreographed by hundreds of accessory proteins. Many actin-binding proteins are thought to be stimulus-response regulators that bind to signaling phospholipids and change their activity upon lipid binding. Whether these proteins associate with and/or are regulated by signaling lipids in plant cells remains poorly understood. Heterodimeric capping protein (CP) is a conserved and ubiquitous regulator of actin dynamics. It binds to the barbed end of filaments with high affinity and modulates filament assembly and disassembly reactions in vitro. Direct interaction of CP with phospholipids, including phosphatidic acid, results in uncapping of filament ends in vitro. Live-cell imaging and reverse-genetic analyses of cp mutants in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) recently provided compelling support for a model in which CP activity is negatively regulated by phosphatidic acid in vivo. Here, we used complementary biochemical, subcellular fractionation, and immunofluorescence microscopy approaches to elucidate CP-membrane association. We found that CP is moderately abundant in Arabidopsis tissues and present in a microsomal membrane fraction. Sucrose density gradient separation and immunoblotting with known compartment markers were used to demonstrate that CP is enriched on membrane-bound organelles such as the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi. This association could facilitate cross talk between the actin cytoskeleton and a wide spectrum of essential cellular functions such as organelle motility and signal transduction.The cellular levels of membrane-associated lipids undergo dynamic changes in response to developmental and environmental stimuli. Different species of phospholipids target specific proteins and this often affects the activity and/or subcellular localization of these lipid-binding proteins. One such membrane lipid, phosphatidic acid (PA), serves as a second messenger and regulates multiple developmental processes in plants, including seedling development, root hair growth and pattern formation, pollen tube growth, leaf senescence, and fruit ripening. PA levels also change during various stress responses, including high salinity and dehydration, pathogen attack, and cold tolerance (Testerink and Munnik, 2005, 2011; Wang, 2005; Li et al., 2009). In mammalian cells, PA is critical for vesicle trafficking events, such as vesicle budding from the Golgi apparatus, vesicle transport, exocytosis, endocytosis, and vesicle fusion (Liscovitch et al., 2000; Freyberg et al., 2003; Jenkins and Frohman, 2005).The actin cytoskeleton and a plethora of actin-binding proteins (ABPs) are well-known targets and transducers of lipid signaling (Drøbak et al., 2004; Saarikangas et al., 2010; Pleskot et al., 2013). For example, several ABPs have the ability to bind phosphoinositide lipids, such as phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate [PtdIns(4,5)P₂]. The severing or actin filament depolymerizing proteins such as villin, cofilin, and profilin are inhibited when bound to PtdIns(4,5)P₂. One ABP appears to be strongly regulated by another phospholipid; human gelsolin binds to lysophosphatidic acid and its filament severing and barbed-end capping activities are inhibited by this biologically active lipid (Meerschaert et al., 1998). Gelsolin is not, however, regulated by PA (Meerschaert et al., 1998), nor are profilin (Lassing and Lindberg, 1985), α-actinin (Fraley et al., 2003), or chicken CapZ (Schafer et al., 1996).The heterodimeric capping protein (CP) from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) also binds to and its activity is inhibited by phospholipids, including both PtdIns(4,5)P₂ and PA (Huang et al., 2003, 2006). PA and phospholipase D activity have been implicated in the actin-dependent tip growth of root hairs and pollen tubes (Ohashi et al., 2003; Potocký et al., 2003; Samaj et al., 2004; Monteiro et al., 2005a; Pleskot et al., 2010). Exogenous application of PA causes an elevation of actin filament levels in suspension cells, pollen, and Arabidopsis epidermal cells (Lee et al., 2003; Potocký et al., 2003; Huang et al., 2006; Li et al., 2012; Pleskot et al., 2013). Capping protein (CP) binds to the barbed end of actin filaments with high (nanomolar) affinity, dissociates quite slowly, and prevents the addition of actin subunits at this end (Huang et al., 2003, 2006; Kim et al., 2007). In the presence of phospholipids, AtCP is not able to bind to the barbed end of actin filaments (Huang et al., 2003, 2006). Furthermore, capped filament ends are uncapped by the addition of PA, allowing actin assembly from a pool of profilin-actin (Huang et al., 2006). Collectively, these data lead to a simple model whereby CP, working in concert with profilin-actin, serves to maintain tight regulation of actin assembly at filament barbed ends (Huang et al., 2006; Blanchoin et al., 2010; Henty-Ridilla et al., 2013; Pleskot et al., 2013). Furthermore, the availability of CP for filament ends can be modulated by fluxes in signaling lipids. Genetic evidence for this model was recently obtained by analyzing the dynamic behavior of actin filament ends in living Arabidopsis epidermal cells after treatment with exogenous PA (Li et al., 2012). Specifically, changes in the architecture of cortical actin arrays and dynamics of individual actin filaments that are induced by PA treatment were found to be attenuated in cp mutant cells (Li et al., 2012; Pleskot et al., 2013).Structural characterization of chicken CapZ demonstrates that the α- and β-subunits of the heterodimer form a compact structure resembling a mushroom with pseudo-two-fold rotational symmetry (Yamashita et al., 2003). Actin- and phospholipid-binding sites are conserved on the C-terminal regions, sometimes referred to as tentacles, which comprise amphipathic α-helices (Cooper and Sept, 2008; Pleskot et al., 2012). Coarse-grained molecular dynamics (CG-MD) simulations recently revealed the mechanism of chicken and AtCP association with membranes (Pleskot et al., 2012). AtCP interacts specifically with lipid bilayers through interactions between PA and the amphipathic helix of the α-subunit tentacle. Extensive polar contacts between lipid headgroups and basic residues on CP (including K278, which is unique to plant CP), as well as partial embedding of nonpolar groups into the lipid bilayer, are observed (Pleskot et al., 2012). Moreover, a glutathione S-transferase fusion protein containing the C-terminal 38 amino acids from capping protein α subunit (CPA) is sufficient to bind PA-containing liposomes in vitro (Pleskot et al., 2012). Collectively, these findings lead us to predict that AtCP will behave like a membrane-associated protein in plant cells.Additional evidence from animal and microbial cells supports the association of CP with biological membranes. In Acanthamoeba castellanii, CP is localized primarily to the hyaline ectoplasm in a region of the cytoplasm just under the plasma membrane that contains a high concentration of actin filaments (Cooper et al., 1984). Localization of CP with regions rich in actin filaments and with membranes was supported by subcellular fractionation experiments, in which CP was associated with a crude membrane fraction that included plasma membrane (Cooper et al., 1984). Further evidence demonstrates that CP localizes to cortical actin patches at sites of new cell wall growth in budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), including the site of bud emergence. By contrast, CP did not colocalize with actin cables in S. cerevisiae (Amatruda and Cooper, 1992). CP may localize to these sites by direct interactions with membrane lipids, through binding the ends of actin filaments, or by association with another protein different from actin. In support of this hypothesis, GFP-CP fusion proteins demonstrate that sites of actin assembling in living cells contain both CP and the actin-related protein2/3 (Arp2/3) complex, and CP is located in two types of structures: (1) motile regions of the cell periphery, which reflect movement of the edge of the lamella during extension and ruffling; and (2) dynamic spots within the lamella (Schafer et al., 1998). CP has been colocalized to the F-actin patches in fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe; Kovar et al., 2005), which promotes Arp2/3-dependent nucleation and branching and limits the extent of filament elongation (Akin and Mullins, 2008). These findings lend additional support for a model whereby CP cooperates with the Arp2/3 complex to regulate actin dynamics (Nakano and Mabuchi, 2006). Activities and localization of other plant ABPs are linked to membranes. Membrane association has been linked to the assembly status of the ARP2/3 complex, an actin filament nucleator, in Arabidopsis (Kotchoni et al., 2009). SPIKE1 (SPK1), a Rho of plants (Rop)-guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) and peripheral membrane protein, maintains the homeostasis of the early secretory pathway and signal integration during morphogenesis through specialized domains in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER; Zhang et al., 2010). Furthermore, Nck-associated protein1 (NAP1), a component of the suppressor of cAMP receptor/WASP-family verprolin homology protein (SCAR/WAVE) complex, strongly associates with membranes and is particularly enriched in ER membranes (Zhang et al., 2013a). Finally, a superfamily of plant ABPs, called NETWORKED proteins, was recently discovered; these link the actin cytoskeleton to various cellular membranes (Deeks et al., 2012; Hawkins et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2014).In this work, we demonstrate that CP is a membrane-associated protein in Arabidopsis. To our knowledge, this is the first direct evidence for CP-membrane association in plants. This interaction likely targets CP to cellular compartments such as the ER and Golgi. This unique location may allow CP to remodel the actin cytoskeleton in the vicinity of endomembrane compartments and/or to respond rapidly to fluxes in signaling lipids.     

Phosphorylation of B-50 Protein by Calcium-Activated, Phospholipid-Dependent Protein Kinase and B-50 Protein Kinase

B-50 is a brain-specific phosphoprotein, the phosphorylation state of which may play a role in the regulation of (poly)phosphoinositide metabolism. Several kinases were tested for their ability to phosphorylate purified B-50 protein. Only calcium-activated, phospholipid-dependent protein kinase (kinase C) and B-50 protein kinase were able to use B-50 protein as a substrate. Furthermore, kinase C specifically phosphorylates B-50 when added to synaptic plasma membranes. We further characterized the sensitivity of kinase C and B-50 kinase to ACTH (and various fragments), phospholipids, chlorpromazine, and proteolytic activation. Since the sensitivities of both kinases were similar, we conclude that B-50 protein kinase is a calcium-dependent, phospholipid-stimulated protein kinase of the same type as kinase C.     

A Major Jasmonate-Inducible Protein of Sweet Potato, Ipomoelin, is an ABA-Independent Wound-Inducible Protein

Treatment of sweet potato plants cultured in vitro with a vaporof methyl jasmonate (MeJA) induced an accumulation in leavesof a large amount of protein with an apparent molecular massof 18 kDa. This protein, designated ipomoelin, was purified,and the amino acid sequences of proteolytic fragments were determined.Screening a cDNA library of MeJA-treated leaves by oligonucleotideprobes designed from the peptide sequences identified a clonethat could code for a polypeptide with 154 amino acids. Thededuced amino acid sequence of ipomoelin showed an overall aminoacid identity of 25% with the salt-inducible SalT protein ofrice. In addition, the C-terminal 70 amino acid sequence ofipomoelin showed about 50% identity with the C-terminal aminoacid sequences of seed lectins from Moraceae. The gene for ipomoelinwas present in a few copies in the genome of sweet potato. ThemRNA for ipomoelin was detected in leaves and petioles, butnot in stems and tuberous roots, of sweet potato plants grownin the field. Mechanical wounding of leaves induced ipomoelinmRNA both locally and systemically, while treatment of leaveswith ABA, salt, or a high level of sucrose did not induce ipomoelinmRNA. By contrast, ABA-inducible mRNA for sporamin was not inducedby MeJA. These results suggest that ipomoelin is involved indefensive reactions of leaves in response to wounding and thatJA-mediated wound-induction of ipomoelin occurs independentlyof ABA. (Received January 6, 1997; Accepted March 13, 1997)     

QAUST: Protein Function Prediction Using Structure Similarity,Protein Interaction,and Functional Motifs

The number of available protein sequences in public databases is increasing exponentially. However, a significant percentage of these sequences lack functional annotation, which is essential for the understanding of how biological systems operate. Here, we propose a novel method, Quantitative Annotation of Unknown STructure (QAUST), to infer protein functions, specifically Gene Ontology (GO) terms and Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers. QAUST uses three sources of information: structure information encoded by global and local structure similarity search, biological network information inferred by protein–protein interaction data, and sequence information extracted from functionally discriminative sequence motifs. These three pieces of information are combined by consensus averaging to make the final prediction. Our approach has been tested on 500 protein targets from the Critical Assessment of Functional Annotation (CAFA) benchmark set. The results show that our method provides accurate functional annotation and outperforms other prediction methods based on sequence similarity search or threading. We further demonstrate that a previously unknown function of human tripartite motif-containing 22 (TRIM22) protein predicted by QAUST can be experimentally validated.     

Missense Mutation Lys18Asn in Dystrophin that Triggers X-Linked Dilated Cardiomyopathy Decreases Protein Stability,Increases Protein Unfolding,and Perturbs Protein Structure,but Does Not Affect Protein Function

Genetic mutations in a vital muscle protein dystrophin trigger X-linked dilated cardiomyopathy (XLDCM). However, disease mechanisms at the fundamental protein level are not understood. Such molecular knowledge is essential for developing therapies for XLDCM. Our main objective is to understand the effect of disease-causing mutations on the structure and function of dystrophin. This study is on a missense mutation K18N. The K18N mutation occurs in the N-terminal actin binding domain (N-ABD). We created and expressed the wild-type (WT) N-ABD and its K18N mutant, and purified to homogeneity. Reversible folding experiments demonstrated that both mutant and WT did not aggregate upon refolding. Mutation did not affect the protein''s overall secondary structure, as indicated by no changes in circular dichroism of the protein. However, the mutant is thermodynamically less stable than the WT (denaturant melts), and unfolds faster than the WT (stopped-flow kinetics). Despite having global secondary structure similar to that of the WT, mutant showed significant local structural changes at many amino acids when compared with the WT (heteronuclear NMR experiments). These structural changes indicate that the effect of mutation is propagated over long distances in the protein structure. Contrary to these structural and stability changes, the mutant had no significant effect on the actin-binding function as evident from co-sedimentation and depolymerization assays. These results summarize that the K18N mutation decreases thermodynamic stability, accelerates unfolding, perturbs protein structure, but does not affect the function. Therefore, K18N is a stability defect rather than a functional defect. Decrease in stability and increase in unfolding decrease the net population of dystrophin molecules available for function, which might trigger XLDCM. Consistently, XLDCM patients have decreased levels of dystrophin in cardiac muscle.     

Mitochondrial Protein Synthesis,Import, and Assembly

The mitochondrion is arguably the most complex organelle in the budding yeast cell cytoplasm. It is essential for viability as well as respiratory growth. Its innermost aqueous compartment, the matrix, is bounded by the highly structured inner membrane, which in turn is bounded by the intermembrane space and the outer membrane. Approximately 1000 proteins are present in these organelles, of which eight major constituents are coded and synthesized in the matrix. The import of mitochondrial proteins synthesized in the cytoplasm, and their direction to the correct soluble compartments, correct membranes, and correct membrane surfaces/topologies, involves multiple pathways and macromolecular machines. The targeting of some, but not all, cytoplasmically synthesized mitochondrial proteins begins with translation of messenger RNAs localized to the organelle. Most proteins then pass through the translocase of the outer membrane to the intermembrane space, where divergent pathways sort them to the outer membrane, inner membrane, and matrix or trap them in the intermembrane space. Roughly 25% of mitochondrial proteins participate in maintenance or expression of the organellar genome at the inner surface of the inner membrane, providing 7 membrane proteins whose synthesis nucleates the assembly of three respiratory complexes.TO think about how mitochondrial proteins are synthesized, imported, and assembled, it is useful to have a clear picture of the organellar structures that they, along with membrane lipids, compose and the functions that they carry out. As almost every schoolchild learns, mitochondria carry out oxidative phosphorylation, the controlled burning of nutrients coupled to ATP synthesis. Since Saccharomyces cerevisiae prefers to ferment sugars, respiration is a dispensable function and nonrespiring mutants are viable [although they cannot undergo meiosis (Jambhekar and Amon 2008)]. However, mitochondria themselves are not dispensable. A substantial fraction of intermediary metabolism occurs in mitochondria (Strathern et al. 1982), and at least one of these pathways, iron–sulfur cluster assembly, is essential for growth (Kispal et al. 2005). Thus, any mutation that prevents the biogenesis of mitochondria by, for example, preventing the import of protein constituents from the cytoplasm, is lethal (Baker and Schatz 1991).The mitochondria of S. cerevisiae are tubular structures at the cell cortex. While the number of distinct compartments can range from 1 to ∼50 depending upon conditions (Stevens 1981; Pon and Schatz 1991), continual fusion and fission events among them effectively form a single dynamic network (Nunnari et al. 1997). The outer membrane surrounds the tubules. The inner membrane has a boundary domain closely juxtaposed beneath the outer membrane and cristae domains that project internally from the boundary into the matrix (Figure 1A). The matrix is the aqueous compartment surrounded by the inner membrane. The aqueous intermembrane space lies between the membranes and is continuous with the space within cristae.Open in a separate windowFigure 1 Overview of mitochondrial structure in yeast. (A) Schematic of compartments comprising mitochondrial tubules. The outer membrane surrounds the organelle. The inner membrane surrounds the matrix and consists of two domains, the inner boundary membrane and the cristae membranes, which are joined at cristae junctions. The intermembrane space lies between the outer membrane and inner membrane. (B) Electron tomograph image of a highly contracted yeast mitochondrion observed en face (a) with the outer membrane (red) and (b) without the outer membrane. Reprinted by permission from John Wiley & Sons from Mannella et al. (2001).Inner membrane cristae are often depicted as baffles emanating from the boundary domain. However, electron tomography of mitochondria from several species, including yeast, shows that cristae actually emanate from the boundary membrane as narrow tubular structures at sites termed “crista junctions” and expand as they project into the matrix (Frey and Mannella 2000; Mannella et al. 2001) (Figure 1B). It seems clear that the boundary and cristae domains of the inner membrane have distinct compositions with respect to the respiratory complexes that are embedded preferentially in the cristae membrane domains, as well as other components (Vogel et al. 2006; Wurm and Jakobs 2006; Rabl et al. 2009; Suppanz et al. 2009; Zick et al. 2009; Davies et al. 2011).The outer and inner boundary membranes are connected at multiple contact sites, at least some of which are involved in protein translocation and may be transient (Pon and Schatz 1991). In addition, there appear to be firm contact sites, not directly involved with protein translocation, preferentially colocalized with crista junctions (Harner et al. 2011a).Overall, there appear to be ∼1000 distinct proteins in yeast mitochondria (Premsler et al. 2009). One series of proteomic studies on highly purified organelles identified 851 proteins thought to represent 85% of the total number of species (Sickmann et al. 2003; Reinders et al. 2006; Zahedi et al. 2006). Another study identified an additional 209 candidates (Prokisch et al. 2004). A computationally driven search for candidates involved in yeast mitochondrial function, coupled with experiments to assay respiratory function and maintenance of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), identified 109 novel candidates, although many of these may not be mitochondrial per se (Hess et al. 2009). Taking the boundary and cristae domains together, the inner membrane is the most protein-rich mitochondrial compartment, followed by the matrix (Daum et al. 1982).Only eight of the yeast mitochondrial proteins detected in proteomic studies are encoded by mtDNA and synthesized within the organelle. They are hydrophobic subunits of respiratory complexes III (bc₁ complex or ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase), IV (cytochrome c oxidase), and V (ATP synthase), as well as a hydrophilic mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal protein. The remaining ∼99% of yeast mitochondrial proteins are encoded by nuclear genes, synthesized in cytoplasmic ribosomes, and imported into the organelle.An overview of known nuclearly encoded mitochondrial protein functions (Figure 2) reveals that ∼25% of them are involved directly in genome maintenance and expression of the eight major mitochondrial genes (Schmidt et al. 2010). The functions of ∼20% of the proteins are not known. Fifteen percent are involved in the well-known processes of energy metabolism. Protein translocation, folding, and turnover functions occupy ∼10% of mitochondrial proteins.Open in a separate windowFigure 2 Classification of identified mitochondrial proteins according to function. Reprinted by permission from Nature Publishing Group from Schmidt et al. (2010).The following discussion reviews our understanding of the biogenesis of mitochondria starting on the outside, the cytoplasm, and working inward through the mitochondrial compartments.     

Protein degradation,signaling, microRNAs and cancer

A report on the biannual Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (ISREC) Symposium on the Cell and Molecular Biology of Cancer, Lausanne, Switzerland, 19-22 January 2005.     

Chloroplasts, Kinetin and Protein Synthesis

The effect of kinetin on protein synthesis of isolated chloroplasts was investigated by following the incorporation of ¹⁴C-leucine into isolated chloroplasts from Nicotiana tabacum. The incorporation activity varied greatly during the year, being largest in the winter and smallest in the summer. Conversely, the relative effect of kinetin on the incorporation of ¹⁴C-leucine, whether applied as a pretreatment to the leaves or directly in the incubation medium, was largest in the summer and smallest or absent altogether in the winter. Kinetin did not prolong the net incorporation period, which lasted about 40 min, but only enhanced the initial rate of the reaction. Chloroplasts extracted from leaves that had been detached for 24 or 48 h displayed very little of their original, pre-aged incorporation activity and treating the leaves with kinetin did not, essentially, prevent this loss. It was concluded that the major effect of kinetin upon chloroplasts may be related primarily to an effect upon hydration and permeability of the chloroplast and its membranes, and not to an effect directly upon its machinery for protein synthesis.     

The Nuclear Envelope Protein,LAP1B,Is a Novel Protein Phosphatase 1 Substrate

Protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) binding proteins are quintessential regulators, determining substrate specificity and defining subcellular localization and activity of the latter. Here, we describe a novel PP1 binding protein, the nuclear membrane protein lamina associated polypeptide 1B (LAP1B), which interacts with the DYT1 dystonia protein torsinA. The PP1 binding domain in LAP1B was here identified as the REVRF motif at amino acids 55-59. The LAP1B:PP1 complex can be immunoprecipitated from cells in culture and rat cortex and the complex was further validated by yeast co-transformations and blot overlay assays. PP1, which is enriched in the nucleus, binds to the N-terminal nuclear domain of LAP1B, as shown by immunocolocalization and domain specific binding studies. PP1 dephosphorylates LAP1B, confirming the physiological relevance of this interaction. These findings place PP1 at a key position to participate in the pathogenesis of DYT1 dystonia and related nuclear envelope-based diseases.     

Protein co-evolution, co-adaptation and interactions

Co-evolution has an important function in the evolution of species and it is clearly manifested in certain scenarios such as host–parasite and predator–prey interactions, symbiosis and mutualism. The extrapolation of the concepts and methodologies developed for the study of species co-evolution at the molecular level has prompted the development of a variety of computational methods able to predict protein interactions through the characteristics of co-evolution. Particularly successful have been those methods that predict interactions at the genomic level based on the detection of pairs of protein families with similar evolutionary histories (similarity of phylogenetic trees: mirrortree). Future advances in this field will require a better understanding of the molecular basis of the co-evolution of protein families. Thus, it will be important to decipher the molecular mechanisms underlying the similarity observed in phylogenetic trees of interacting proteins, distinguishing direct specific molecular interactions from other general functional constraints. In particular, it will be important to separate the effects of physical interactions within protein complexes (‘co-adaptation') from other forces that, in a less specific way, can also create general patterns of co-evolution.