首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 62 毫秒
1.
文中旨在建立结核分枝杆菌利福平耐药基因rpoB的荧光分子标记,为分子药物敏感性试验提供简便、可靠的基因分型检测方法。对比分析利福平耐药菌株rpoB基因531、526、516、511、513等氨基酸位点的基因突变与敏感菌株中等位基因的序列差异,结合PARMS技术 (Penta-primer amplification refractory mutation system),建立rpoB基因的荧光分子标记。利用其对104例结核分枝杆菌临床分离株进行检测,经Sanger测序验证,正确率100%。并采用比例法药敏试验对这104份样本进行了利福平耐药性鉴定,与分子标记结果相符率为94.23%。结果表明,分子标记有较强可靠性,能检出表型药敏无法测出的低浓度耐药样本 (511/533单位点突变)。建立的11组荧光分子标记能覆盖92%–96%的利福平耐药菌株rpoB基因突变类型,为快速检测结核分枝杆菌利福平耐药提供新思路。  相似文献   

2.
目的:调查深圳地区结核分枝杆菌耐利福平(RFP)株rpoB基因突变的分布情况,建立结核分枝杆菌耐药基因快速检测的方法.方法:对55株结核分枝杆菌临床分离株的rpoB基因280个碱基(包括其核心区75个碱基)应用PCR-直接测序法(PCR-DS)测定序列,其中耐利福平株51株,敏感株4株.结果:4株敏感株无突变,92.2%(47/51)耐利福平临床分离株存在rpoB基因突变.基因突变导致531位氨基酸突变率为41.2%(21/51);导致526位氨基酸突变率为29.4%(15/51);导致516位氨基酸突变率为13.7%(7/51).联合突变发生率为2.0%(1/51).未检测到发生缺失或插入碱基突变的菌株.结论:深圳地区结核分枝杆菌耐利福平株发生rpoB基因突变最常见的是531位丝氨酸、526位组氨酸和516位天冬氨酸的基因突变,三者突变率之和为84.3%(43/51).PCR-DS方法可快速测定结核分枝杆菌RFP耐药基因突变.  相似文献   

3.
目的:采用基因芯片技术对结核分枝杆菌中常见耐药基因rpoB、katG及inhA进行检测,以了解结核分枝杆菌的耐药情况,及基因芯片技术检测结核菌耐药基因的临床应用价值。方法:收集40例涂片抗酸染色阳性并经分枝杆菌菌种鉴定芯片鉴定为结核的样本进行结核耐药基因检测。结果:40例样本中,14例无法判读结果,占35%,检出26例,检出率为65%。其中,无突变的野生型21例,占52.5%;突变型5例,总突变率为12.5%;3例rpoB基因的531点单独突变(TCG→TTG),突变率为7.5%;2例katG基因的315点单独突变(AGC→ACC),突变率为5%。结论:结核耐药基因芯片试剂盒检测结核菌耐药基因时针对单个菌落,用痰样本直接检测耐药基因虽能简便快速地了解结核分枝杆菌的耐药情况,但会出现一些无法判读的结果,原因须进一步探讨。  相似文献   

4.
目的 研究抗酸染色结核分枝杆菌(简称结核杆菌)阳性痰涂片标本直接用于耐药性检测的方法。方法 对18株临床分离培养的结核杆菌用利福平进行药敏试验。分别提取菌株DNA和与之对应的痰涂片标本的菌体DNA,用聚合酶链反应(PcR)扩增ropB基因后进行固相杂交和核酸测序检测结核杆菌的耐药性。结果 18株结核杆菌中有12株对利福平耐药。经PCR扩增的ropB片段与探针杂交后,敏感菌株未发现rpoB基因的突变,自耐药菌株提取的DNA中rpoB突变体的检出率为100%(12/12),痰涂片提取DNA的检出率为91.7%(11/12)。所有耐药菌株DNA与痰涂片DNA核酸测序结果相吻合,都有rpoB基因核心区域碱基突变。结论 抗酸染色痰涂片阳性标本可直接用于检测结核杆菌利福平耐药基因rpoB突变体,是一种值得临床实验室推广使用的耐药菌诊断方法。  相似文献   

5.
目的 建立聚合酶链反应-单链构象多态性(PCR-SSCP)技术快速检测结核分枝杆菌利福平(RFP)耐药相关基因rpoB突变.方法 设计结核分枝杆菌RFP耐药相关rpoB基因PCR引物,建立PCR-SSCP技术检测临床菌株rpoB基因的突变导致的运动变位,同时采用PCR直接测序(PCR-DS)技术检测rpoB基因突变,并对上述方法检测结果进行分析和比较.结果 84株临床菌株均含有rpoB基因;PCR-SSCP和PCR-DS检测结果显示,56株RFP敏感菌株中rpoB基因分别有3株和2株检测出突变,检测特异性分别为94.6% (53/56)和96.4%(54/56);28株RFP耐药菌株中rpoB基因分别有27株和28株发生突变,检测灵敏度分别为96.4%和100%.结论 本研究建立的PCR-SSCP技术能快速、简便、特异、敏感地检测结核分枝杆菌利福平耐药基因rpoB突变,具有临床应用前景.  相似文献   

6.
本研究通过小鼠体内实验检测我国部分地区结核分枝杆菌耐药菌株的毒力,以筛选耐药结核分枝杆菌感染动物模型所用菌株。收集从我国部分省份98例结核病患者痰培养液中分离出的结核分枝杆菌,用比例法药敏试验进行结核分枝杆菌一线和二线药物的药敏试验,筛选出对二线药物敏感而对一线药物利福平或异烟肼耐药或敏感的菌株,然后进行小鼠体内毒力实验,对异烟肼耐药相关基因katG和利福平耐药相关基因rpoB测序并进行基因突变分析。从98株菌中筛选出药物敏感谱清晰的40株,进行小鼠体内毒力实验。结果显示,共35株半数死亡时间≤H37Rv的半数死亡时间,其中18株耐利福平合并耐异烟肼、5株单耐利福平,7株单耐异烟肼、5株对利福平和异烟肼均敏感。通过小鼠毒力研究,分别筛选出基因背景清晰,半数死亡时间≤7d的耐利福平合并耐异烟肼的菌株1株、半数死亡时间≤7d单耐利福平和异烟肼的菌株各1株,作为耐药结核分枝杆菌感染小鼠模型所用菌株及进一步进行豚鼠等其他动物模型感染用候选菌株。  相似文献   

7.
结核分枝杆菌Mycobacterium tuberculsis(M.t)4种耐药基因的研究,了解耐药基因突变情况和耐药水平的关系。108例临床痰标本临床分离株均做传统梯度药敏试验和聚合酶链反应多态-单链构象多态性(PCR-SSCP)试验。结果表明耐SM(rpsL)REP(rpoB)INH(katG)EMB(embB)基因突变率分别为78.5%,68.2%,70.5%,48.6%。其中,上海高耐药株基因突变率分别为86.5%,89.3%,84.3%,35.3%。低耐药株分别为28.5%,16.5%,7.1%。EMB在低耐药区无基因突变。M.t的4种耐药基因联合检测的分析,在国内外很少报道。部分M.t的耐药由耐药基因突变所致,M.t耐药基因突变与耐药水平密切相关,且M.t基因突变绝大多数发生在高耐药区中,也有少部分在低耐区株中发生。  相似文献   

8.
结核分枝杆菌三种耐药基因的检测方法   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
建立3种结核分枝杆菌耐药基因的检测方法,探讨耐药基因突变与耐药性的关系。将58株临床分离株均做聚合酶链反应-单链构象多态性分析(PCR—SSCP)和传统药物敏感试验。结果表明,结核分枝杆菌耐药基因突变与耐药水平有密切联系,绝大多数结核分枝杆菌耐药基因突变发生在高耐药株,少部分在低耐药株发生基因突变。  相似文献   

9.
目的:了解复治肺结核患者的结核分枝杆菌L型培养情况,探讨结核分枝杆菌L型阳性与耐多药的关系。方法:选择180例肺结核患者的痰标本进行结核分枝杆菌培养和结核分枝杆菌L型培养,同时对110例复治组中培养阳性的标本行耐药监测。结果:复治组的L型阳性率为43.6%,初治组的L型阳性率为15.7%,复治组显著高于初治组(P<0.01);菌阳复治组的L型阳性率50%,菌阴复治组的L型阳性率39.4%,菌阳组明显高于菌阴组(P<0.05);L型菌阳性患者的耐药率显著高于L型菌阴性组(P<0.05)。结论:结核分枝杆菌L型阳性是引起结核病复发、耐药的重要原因;MDR-TB与结核分枝杆菌L型感染有关。  相似文献   

10.
目的:研究结核分枝杆菌耐链霉素和乙胺丁醇的rpsL和emb B基因突变情况,探讨耐药基因突变与耐药性的关系。方法:通过传统药敏实验和聚合酶链反应(PCR)--单链构象多态性(SSCP)技术初步鉴定62株临床分离株的药敏和rps L、emb B基因。结果:与结核菌标准株H37Rv对照,分析30例TB菌耐链霉素(SM)的rps L基因,发现其突变率为70.0%(21/30),分析29例耐乙胺丁醇(EMB)的emb B基因,该基因的突变率为65.5%(19/29)。结论:部分结核分枝杆菌耐SM和EMB是由于其rps L、emb B基因突变所致,PCR-SSCP银染技术可能成为测定部分结核分枝杆菌耐药的简便、快速的方法。  相似文献   

11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
On the origin of the Hirudinea and the demise of the Oligochaeta   总被引:10,自引:0,他引:10  
The phylogenetic relationships of the Clitellata were investigated with a data set of published and new complete 18S rRNA gene sequences of 51 species representing 41 families. Sequences were aligned on the basis of a secondary structure model and analysed with maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. In contrast to the latter method, parsimony did not recover the monophyly of Clitellata. However, a close scrutiny of the data suggested a spurious attraction between some polychaetes and clitellates. As a rule, molecular trees are closely aligned with morphology-based phylogenies. Acanthobdellida and Euhirudinea were reconciled in their traditional Hirudinea clade and were included in the Oligochaeta with the Branchiobdellida via the Lumbriculidae as a possible link between the two assemblages. While the 18S gene yielded a meaningful historical signal for determining relationships within clitellates, the exact position of Hirudinea and Branchiobdellida within oligochaetes remained unresolved. The lack of phylogenetic signal is interpreted as evidence for a rapid radiation of these taxa. The placement of Clitellata within the Polychaeta remained unresolved. The biological reality of polytomies within annelids is suggested and supports the hypothesis of an extremely ancient radiation of polychaetes and emergence of clitellates.  相似文献   

16.
17.
18.
Data on the ontogeny of the posterior haptor of monogeneans were obtained from more than 150 publications and summarised. These data were plotted into diagrams showing evolutionary capacity levels based on the theory of a progressive evolution of marginal hooks, anchors and other attachment components of the posterior haptor in the Monogenea (Malmberg, 1986). 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks are assumed to be the most primitive monogenean haptoral condition. Thus the diagrams were founded on a 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hook evolutionary capacity level, and the evolutionary capacity levels of anchors and other haptoral attachement components were arranged according to haptoral ontogenetical sequences. In the final plotting diagram data on hosts, type of spermatozoa, oncomiracidial ciliation, sensilla pattern and protonephridial systems were also included. In this way a number of correlations were revealed. Thus, for example, the number of 5 + 5 marginal hooks correlates with the most primitive monogenean type of spermatozoon and with few sensillae, many ciliated cells and a simple protonephridial system in the oncomiracidium. On the basis of the reviewed data it is concluded that the ancient monogeneans with 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks were divided into two main lines, one retaining unhinged marginal hooks and the other evolving hinged marginal hooks. Both main lines have recent representatives at different marginal hook evolutionary capacity levels, i.e. monogeneans retaining a haptor with only marginal hooks. For the main line with hinged marginal hooks the name Articulon-choinea n. subclass is proposed. Members with 8 + 8 hinged marginal hooks only are here called Proanchorea n. superord. Monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks only are here called Ananchorea n. superord. and three new families are erected for its recent members: Anonchohapteridae n. fam., Acolpentronidae n. fam. and Anacanthoridae n. fam. (with 7 + 7, 8 + 8 and 9 + 9 unhinged marginal hooks, respectively). Except for the families of Articulonchoinea (e.g. Acanthocotylidae, Gyrodactylidae, Tetraonchoididae) Bychowsky's (1957) division of the Monogenea into the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea fits the proposed scheme, i.e. monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks form one old group, the Oligonchoinea, which have 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks, and the other group form the Polyonchoinea, which (with the exception of the Hexabothriidae) has a greater number (7 + 7, 8 + 8 or 9 + 9) of unhinged marginal hooks. It is proposed that both these names, Oligonchoinea (sensu mihi) and Polyonchoinea (sensu mihi), will be retained on one side and Articulonchoinea placed on the other side, which reflects the early monogenean evolution. Except for the members of Ananchorea [Polyonchoinea], all members of the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea have anchors, which imply that they are further evolved, i.e. have passed the 5 + 5 marginal hook evolutionary capacity level (Malmberg, 1986). There are two main types of anchors in the Monogenea: haptoral anchors, with anlages appearing in the haptor, and peduncular anchors, with anlages in the peduncle. There are two types of haptoral anchors: peripheral haptoral anchors, ontogenetically the oldest, and central haptoral anchors. Peduncular anchors, in turn, are ontogenetically younger than peripheral haptoral anchors. There may be two pairs of peduncular anchors: medial peduncular anchors, ontogentically the oldest, and lateral peduncular anchors. Only peduncular (not haptoral) anchors have anchor bars. Monogeneans with haptoral anchors are here called Mediohaptanchorea n. superord. and Laterohaptanchorea n. superord. or haptanchoreans. All oligonchoineans and the oldest polyonchoineans are haptanchoreans. Certain members of Calceostomatidae [Polyonchoinea] are the only monogeneans with both (peripheral) haptoral and peduncular anchors (one pair). These monogeneans are here called Mixanchorea n. superord. Polyonchoineans with peduncular anchors and unhinged marginal hooks are here called the Pedunculanchorea n. superord. The most primitive pedunculanchoreans have only one pair of peduncular anchors with an anchor bar, while the most advanced have both medial and lateral peduncular anchors; each pair having an anchor bar. Certain families of the Articulonchoinea, the Anchorea n. superord., also have peduncular anchors (parallel evolution): only one family, the Sundanonchidae n. fam., has both medial and lateral peduncular anchors, each anchor pair with an anchor bar. Evolutionary lines from different monogenean evolutionary capacity levels are discussed and a new system of classification for the Monogenea is proposed.In agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. EditorIn agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. Editor  相似文献   

19.
20.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号