Organization of the BcgI restriction-modification protein for the cleavage of eight phosphodiester bonds in DNA

Type IIB restriction-modification systems, such as BcgI, feature a single protein with both endonuclease and methyltransferase activities. Type IIB nucleases require two recognition sites and cut both strands on both sides of their unmodified sites. BcgI cuts all eight target phosphodiester bonds before dissociation. The BcgI protein contains A and B polypeptides in a 2:1 ratio: A has one catalytic centre for each activity; B recognizes the DNA. We show here that BcgI is organized as A₂B protomers, with B at its centre, but that these protomers self-associate to assemblies containing several A₂B units. Moreover, like the well known FokI nuclease, BcgI bound to its site has to recruit additional protomers before it can cut DNA. DNA-bound BcgI can alternatively be activated by excess A subunits, much like the activation of FokI by its catalytic domain. Eight A subunits, each with one centre for nuclease activity, are presumably needed to cut the eight bonds cleaved by BcgI. Its nuclease reaction may thus involve two A₂B units, each bound to a recognition site, with two more A₂B units bridging the complexes by protein–protein interactions between the nuclease domains.     

Concerted action at eight phosphodiester bonds by the BcgI restriction endonuclease

The BcgI endonuclease exemplifies a subset of restriction enzymes, the Type IIB class, which make two double-strand breaks (DSBs) at each copy of their recognition sequence, one either side of the site, to excise the sequence from the remainder of the DNA. In this study, we show that BcgI is essentially inactive when bound to a single site and that to cleave a DNA with one copy of its recognition sequence, it has to act in trans, bridging two separate DNA molecules. We also show that BcgI makes the two DSBs at an individual site in a highly concerted manner. Intermediates cut on one side of the site do not accumulate during the course of the reaction: instead, the DNA is converted straight to the final products cut on both sides. On DNA with two sites, BcgI bridges the sites in cis and then generally proceeds to cut both strands on both sides of both sites without leaving the DNA. The BcgI restriction enzyme can thus excise two DNA segments together, by cleaving eight phosphodiester bonds within a single-DNA binding event.     

Organization of the BcgI restriction–modification protein for the transfer of one methyl group to DNA

The Type IIB restriction–modification protein BcgI contains A and B subunits in a 2:1 ratio: A has the active sites for both endonuclease and methyltransferase functions while B recognizes the DNA. Like almost all Type IIB systems, BcgI needs two unmethylated sites for nuclease activity; it cuts both sites upstream and downstream of the recognition sequence, hydrolyzing eight phosphodiester bonds in a single synaptic complex. This complex may incorporate four A₂B protomers to give the eight catalytic centres (one per A subunit) needed to cut all eight bonds. The BcgI recognition sequence contains one adenine in each strand that can be N⁶-methylated. Although most DNA methyltransferases operate at both unmethylated and hemi-methylated sites, BcgI methyltransferase is only effective at hemi-methylated sites, where the nuclease component is inactive. Unlike the nuclease, the methyltransferase acts at solitary sites, functioning catalytically rather than stoichiometrically. Though it transfers one methyl group at a time, presumably through a single A subunit, BcgI methyltransferase can be activated by adding extra A subunits, either individually or as part of A₂B protomers, which indicates that it requires an assembly containing at least two A₂B units.     

A switch in the mechanism of communication between the two DNA-binding sites in the SfiI restriction endonuclease

While many Type II restriction enzymes are dimers with a single DNA-binding cleft between the subunits, SfiI is a tetramer of identical subunits. Two of its subunits (a dimeric unit) create one DNA-binding cleft, and the other two create a second cleft on the opposite side of the protein. The two clefts bind specific DNA cooperatively to give a complex of SfiI with two recognition sites. This complex is responsible for essentially all of the DNA-cleavage reactions by SfiI: virtually none is due to the complex with one site. The communication between the DNA-binding clefts was examined by disrupting one of the very few polar interactions in the otherwise hydrophobic interface between the dimeric units: a tyrosine hydroxyl was removed by mutation to phenylalanine. The mutant protein remained tetrameric in solution and could bind two DNA sites. But instead of being activated by binding two sites, like wild-type SfiI, it showed maximal activity when bound to a single site and had a lower activity when bound to two sites. This interaction across the dimer interface thus enforces in wild-type SfiI a cooperative transition between inactive and active states in both dimers, but without this interaction as in the mutant protein, a single dimer can undergo the transition to give a stable intermediate with one inactive dimer and one active dimer.     

Reactions of BglI and other type II restriction endonucleases with discontinuous recognition sites

Type II restriction enzymes generally recognize continuous sequences of 4-8 consecutive base pairs on DNA, but some recognize discontinuous sites where the specified sequence is interrupted by a defined length of nonspecific DNA. To date, a mechanism has been established for only one type II endonuclease with a discontinuous site, SfiI at GGCCNNNNNGGCC (where N is any base). In contrast to orthodox enzymes such as EcoRV, dimeric proteins that act at a single site, SfiI is a tetramer that interacts with two sites before cleaving DNA. BglI has a similar recognition sequence (GCCNNNNNGGC) to SfiI but a crystal structure like EcoRV. BglI and several other endonucleases with discontinuous sites were examined to see if they need two sites for their DNA cleavage reactions. The enzymes included some with sites containing lengthy segments of nonspecific DNA, such as XcmI (CCANNNNNNNNNTGG). In all cases, they acted at individual sites. Elongated recognition sites do not necessitate unusual reaction mechanisms. Other experiments on BglI showed that it bound to and cleaved DNA in the same manner as EcoRV, thus further delineating a distinct group of restriction enzymes with similar structures and a common reaction mechanism.     

Type I restriction systems: sophisticated molecular machines (a legacy of Bertani and Weigle).

Restriction enzymes are well known as reagents widely used by molecular biologists for genetic manipulation and analysis, but these reagents represent only one class (type II) of a wider range of enzymes that recognize specific nucleotide sequences in DNA molecules and detect the provenance of the DNA on the basis of specific modifications to their target sequence. Type I restriction and modification (R-M) systems are complex; a single multifunctional enzyme can respond to the modification state of its target sequence with the alternative activities of modification or restriction. In the absence of DNA modification, a type I R-M enzyme behaves like a molecular motor, translocating vast stretches of DNA towards itself before eventually breaking the DNA molecule. These sophisticated enzymes are the focus of this review, which will emphasize those aspects that give insights into more general problems of molecular and microbial biology. Current molecular experiments explore target recognition, intramolecular communication, and enzyme activities, including DNA translocation. Type I R-M systems are notable for their ability to evolve new specificities, even in laboratory cultures. This observation raises the important question of how bacteria protect their chromosomes from destruction by newly acquired restriction specifities. Recent experiments demonstrate proteolytic mechanisms by which cells avoid DNA breakage by a type I R-M system whenever their chromosomal DNA acquires unmodified target sequences. Finally, the review will reflect the present impact of genomic sequences on a field that has previously derived information almost exclusively from the analysis of bacteria commonly studied in the laboratory.     

I-Ssp6803I: the first homing endonuclease from the PD-(D/E)XK superfamily exhibits an unusual mode of DNA recognition

MOTIVATION: Restriction endonucleases (REases) and homing endonucleases (HEases) are biotechnologically important enzymes. Nearly all structurally characterized REases belong to the PD-(D/E)XK superfamily of nucleases, while most HEases belong to an unrelated LAGLIDADG superfamily. These two protein folds are typically associated with very different modes of protein-DNA recognition, consistent with the different mechanisms of action required to achieve high specificity. REases recognize short DNA sequences using multiple contacts per base pair, while HEases recognize very long sites using a few contacts per base pair, thereby allowing for partial degeneracy of the target sequence. Thus far, neither REases with the LAGLIDADG fold, nor HEases with the PD-(D/E)XK fold, have been found. RESULTS: Using protein fold recognition, we have identified the first member of the PD-(D/E)XK superfamily among homing endonucleases, a cyanobacterial enzyme I-Ssp6803I. We present a model of the I-Ssp6803I-DNA complex based on the structure of Type II restriction endonuclease R.BglI and predict the active site and residues involved in specific DNA sequence recognition by I-Ssp6803I. Our finding reveals a new unexpected evolutionary link between HEases and REases and suggests how PD-(D/E)XK nucleases may develop a 'HEase-like' way of interacting with the extended DNA sequence. This in turn may be exploited to study the evolution of DNA sequence specificity and to engineer nucleases with new substrate specificities.     

Type III restriction-modification enzymes: a historical perspective

Restriction endonucleases interact with DNA at specific sites leading to cleavage of DNA. Bacterial DNA is protected from restriction endonuclease cleavage by modifying the DNA using a DNA methyltransferase. Based on their molecular structure, sequence recognition, cleavage position and cofactor requirements, restriction–modification (R–M) systems are classified into four groups. Type III R–M enzymes need to interact with two separate unmethylated DNA sequences in inversely repeated head-to-head orientations for efficient cleavage to occur at a defined location (25–27 bp downstream of one of the recognition sites). Like the Type I R–M enzymes, Type III R–M enzymes possess a sequence-specific ATPase activity for DNA cleavage. ATP hydrolysis is required for the long-distance communication between the sites before cleavage. Different models, based on 1D diffusion and/or 3D-DNA looping, exist to explain how the long-distance interaction between the two recognition sites takes place. Type III R–M systems are found in most sequenced bacteria. Genome sequencing of many pathogenic bacteria also shows the presence of a number of phase-variable Type III R–M systems, which play a role in virulence. A growing number of these enzymes are being subjected to biochemical and genetic studies, which, when combined with ongoing structural analyses, promise to provide details for mechanisms of DNA recognition and catalysis.     

The link between restriction endonuclease fidelity and oligomeric state: A study with Bse634I

Type II restriction endonucleases (REases) exist in multiple oligomeric forms. The tetrameric REases have two DNA binding interfaces and must synapse two recognition sites to achieve cleavage. It was hypothesised that binding of two recognition sites by tetrameric enzymes contributes to their fidelity. Here, we experimentally determined the fidelity for Bse634I REase in different oligomeric states. Surprisingly, we find that tetramerisation does not increase REase fidelity in comparison to the dimeric variant. Instead, an inherent ability to act concertedly at two sites provides tetrameric REase with a safety-catch to prevent host DNA cleavage if a single unmodified site becomes available.     

Use of the antibiotics actinomycin D and distamycin A to limit the action of restriction endonucleases and to map DNA

It is shown that distamycin A and actinomycin D protect the recognition sites of certain restriction endonucleases from the attack by these nucleases due to specific interaction of these antibiotics with double-stranded DNA. Distamycin A protects A-T containing sites and actinomycin G-C rich sites. Among Hind II recognition sites which have alternative structure (GTPyPuAC) distamycin A protects only Hpa I similar sites (GTTAAC). It is shown with several restriction endonucleases that antibiotic action depends on the nucleotide sequences in the recognition sites and in their closest environment. Proper concentrations of antibiotic give rise to larger fragments. Use of both distamycin A and actinomycin D allows to obtain a set of overlapping fragments. The data obtained with various DNAs and restriction endonucleases allow to conclude that these antibiotics may be useful for DNA mapping and for preparation of large functional fragments of DNA.     

Temporal dynamics of methyltransferase and restriction endonuclease accumulation in individual cells after introducing a restriction-modification system

Type II restriction-modification (R-M) systems encode a restriction endonuclease that cleaves DNA at specific sites, and a methyltransferase that modifies same sites protecting them from restriction endonuclease cleavage. Type II R-M systems benefit bacteria by protecting them from bacteriophages. Many type II R-M systems are plasmid-based and thus capable of horizontal transfer. Upon the entry of such plasmids into a naïve host with unmodified genomic recognition sites, methyltransferase should be synthesized first and given sufficient time to methylate recognition sites in the bacterial genome before the toxic restriction endonuclease activity appears. Here, we directly demonstrate a delay in restriction endonuclease synthesis after transformation of Escherichia coli cells with a plasmid carrying the Esp1396I type II R-M system, using single-cell microscopy. We further demonstrate that before the appearance of the Esp1396I restriction endonuclease the intracellular concentration of Esp1396I methyltransferase undergoes a sharp peak, which should allow rapid methylation of host genome recognition sites. A mathematical model that satisfactorily describes the observed dynamics of both Esp1396I enzymes is presented. The results reported here were obtained using a functional Esp1396I type II R-M system encoding both enzymes fused to fluorescent proteins. Similar approaches should be applicable to the studies of other R-M systems at single-cell level.     

Scanning force microscopy of DNA translocation by the Type III restriction enzyme EcoP15I

Type III restriction enzymes are multifunctional heterooligomeric enzymes that cleave DNA at a fixed position downstream of a non-symmetric recognition site. For effective DNA cleavage these restriction enzymes need the presence of two unmethylated, inversely oriented recognition sites in the DNA molecule. DNA cleavage was proposed to result from ATP-dependent DNA translocation, which is expected to induce DNA loop formation, and collision of two enzyme-DNA complexes. We used scanning force microscopy to visualise the protein interaction with linear DNA molecules containing two EcoP15I recognition sites in inverse orientation. In the presence of the cofactors ATP and Mg(2+), EcoP15I molecules were shown to bind specifically to the recognition sites and to form DNA loop structures. One of the origins of the protein-clipped DNA loops was shown to be located at an EcoP15I recognition site, the other origin had an unspecific position in between the two EcoP15I recognition sites. The data demonstrate for the first time DNA translocation by the Type III restriction enzyme EcoP15I using scanning force microscopy. Moreover, our study revealed differences in the DNA-translocation processes mediated by Type I and Type III restriction enzymes.     

How Do Type II Topoisomerases Use ATP Hydrolysis to Simplify DNA Topology beyond Equilibrium? Investigating the Relaxation Reaction of Nonsupercoiling Type II Topoisomerases

DNA topoisomerases control the topology of DNA (e.g., the level of supercoiling) in all cells. Type IIA topoisomerases are ATP-dependent enzymes that have been shown to simplify the topology of their DNA substrates to a level beyond that expected at equilibrium (i.e., more relaxed than the product of relaxation by ATP-independent enzymes, such as type I topoisomerases, or a lower-than-equilibrium level of catenation). The mechanism of this effect is currently unknown, although several models have been suggested. We have analyzed the DNA relaxation reactions of type II topoisomerases to further explore this phenomenon. We find that all type IIA topoisomerases tested exhibit the effect to a similar degree and that it is not dependent on the supercoil-sensing C-terminal domains of the enzymes. As recently reported, the type IIB topoisomerase, topoisomerase VI (which is only distantly related to type IIA enzymes), does not exhibit topology simplification. We find that topology simplification is not significantly dependent on circle size in the range ∼ 2-9 kbp and is not altered by reducing the free energy available from ATP hydrolysis by varying the ADP:ATP ratio. A direct test of one model (DNA tracking; i.e., sliding of a protein clamp along DNA to trap supercoils) suggests that this is unlikely to be the explanation for the effect. We conclude that geometric selection of DNA segments by the enzymes is likely to be a primary source of the effect, but that it is possible that other kinetic factors contribute. We also speculate whether topology simplification might simply be an evolutionary relic, with no adaptive significance.     

One recognition sequence, seven restriction enzymes, five reaction mechanisms

The diversity of reaction mechanisms employed by Type II restriction enzymes was investigated by analysing the reactions of seven endonucleases at the same DNA sequence. NarI, KasI, Mly113I, SfoI, EgeI, EheI and BbeI cleave DNA at several different positions in the sequence 5′-GGCGCC-3′. Their reactions on plasmids with one or two copies of this sequence revealed five distinct mechanisms. These differ in terms of the number of sites the enzyme binds, and the number of phosphodiester bonds cleaved per turnover. NarI binds two sites, but cleaves only one bond per DNA-binding event. KasI also cuts only one bond per turnover but acts at individual sites, preferring intact to nicked sites. Mly113I cuts both strands of its recognition sites, but shows full activity only when bound to two sites, which are then cleaved concertedly. SfoI, EgeI and EheI cut both strands at individual sites, in the manner historically considered as normal for Type II enzymes. Finally, BbeI displays an absolute requirement for two sites in close physical proximity, which are cleaved concertedly. The range of reaction mechanisms for restriction enzymes is thus larger than commonly imagined, as is the number of enzymes needing two recognition sites.     

Restriction endonucleases from Herpetosiphon giganteus: an example of the evolution of DNA recognition specificity?

We describe the partial purification and characterisation of five Type II restriction endonucleases from two strains of Herpetosiphon giganteus. One of the activities, HgiJII, was the first enzyme found that cleaves DNA at the family of related sequences 5'-G-R-G-C-Y/C-3'. This enzyme may be related to the enzyme HgiAI from a different strain of the same species, and which cleaves at the sites 5'-G-W-G-C-W/C-3'. We have shown that DNAs from the strains producing HgiAI and HgiJII are resistant to both of these restriction endonucleases. The remaining four enzymes described here share recognition and cleavage specificities with other restriction endonucleases. The evolution of Type II restriction-modification systems and their role in vivo are discussed.     

鳞翅目基因组IIB型内切酶位点的统计分析

IIB型限制内切酶能够识别并切割特异酶切位点两端特定距离的DNA,形成粘性末端的30 bp左右的等长DNA片段。利用其特性与限制性酶切位点关联测序技术(RAD)相结合发展出2b-RAD简化基因组测序技术,应用于遗传图谱构建、种群遗传结构分析、性状定位以及细菌分型等多种研究领域。构建2b-RAD测序文库之前,需要对基因组中的IIB型限制内切酶位点进行预测与统计分析,制定有效的测序文库构建方案。本文利用Python语言构建分析基因组中IIB型限制内切酶位点的流程,预测并统计6个鳞翅目代表物种基因组含有的8个商业化IIB型限制内切酶的酶切位点,比较了各个基因组与IIB型限制内切酶之间含有的酶切位点总量、重复序列数量以及酶切间隔长度的关系,为在昆虫基因组中进一步试行2b-RAD研究提供了参考。     

Nucleoside triphosphate-dependent restriction enzymes

The known nucleoside triphosphate-dependent restriction enzymes are hetero-oligomeric proteins that behave as molecular machines in response to their target sequences. They translocate DNA in a process dependent on the hydrolysis of a nucleoside triphosphate. For the ATP-dependent type I and type III restriction and modification systems, the collision of translocating complexes triggers hydrolysis of phosphodiester bonds in unmodified DNA to generate double-strand breaks. Type I endonucleases break the DNA at unspecified sequences remote from the target sequence, type III endonucleases at a fixed position close to the target sequence. Type I and type III restriction and modification (R-M) systems are notable for effective post-translational control of their endonuclease activity. For some type I enzymes, this control is mediated by proteolytic degradation of that subunit of the complex which is essential for DNA translocation and breakage. This control, lacking in the well-studied type II R-M systems, provides extraordinarily effective protection of resident DNA should it acquire unmodified target sequences. The only well-documented GTP-dependent restriction enzyme, McrBC, requires methylated target sequences for the initiation of phosphodiester bond cleavage.     

Recognition sequences of type II restriction systems are constrained by the G + C content of host genomes

I show that the recognition sequences of Type II restriction systems are correlated with the G + C content of the host bacterial DNA. Almost all restriction systems with G + C rich tetranucleotide recognition sequences are found in species with A + T rich genomes, whereas G + C rich hexanucleotide and octanucleotide recognition sequences are found almost exclusively in species with G + C rich genomes. Most hexanucleotide recognition sequences found in species with A + T rich genomes are A + T rich. This distribution eliminates a substantial proportion of the potential variance in the frequency of restriction recognition sequences in the host genomes. As a consequence, almost all restriction recognition sequences, including those eight base pairs in length (Not I and Sfi I), are predicted to occur with a frequency ranging from once every 300 to once every 5,000 base pairs in the host genome. Since the G + C content of bacteriophage DNA and of the host genome are also correlated, the data presented is evidence that most Type II "restriction systems" are indeed involved in phage restriction.     

DNA translocation blockage, a general mechanism of cleavage site selection by type I restriction enzymes

Type I restriction enzymes bind to a specific DNA sequence and subsequently translocate DNA past the complex to reach a non-specific cleavage site. We have examined several potential blocks to DNA translocation, such as positive supercoiling or a Holliday junction, for their ability to trigger DNA cleavage by type I restriction enzymes. Introduction of positive supercoiling into plasmid DNA did not have a significant effect on the rate of DNA cleavage by EcoAI endonuclease nor on the enzyme's ability to select cleavage sites randomly throughout the DNA molecule. Thus, positive supercoiling does not prevent DNA translocation. EcoR124II endonuclease cleaved DNA at Holliday junctions present on both linear and negatively supercoiled substrates. The latter substrate was cleaved by a single enzyme molecule at two sites, one on either side of the junction, consistent with a bi-directional translocation model. Linear DNA molecules with two recognition sites for endonucleases from different type I families were cut between the sites when both enzymes were added simultaneously but not when a single enzyme was added. We propose that type I restriction enzymes can track along a DNA substrate irrespective of its topology and cleave DNA at any barrier that is able to halt the translocation process.     

Type I restriction endonucleases are true catalytic enzymes

Type I restriction endonucleases are intriguing, multifunctional complexes that restrict DNA randomly, at sites distant from the target sequence. Restriction at distant sites is facilitated by ATP hydrolysis-dependent, translocation of double-stranded DNA towards the stationary enzyme bound at the recognition sequence. Following restriction, the enzymes are thought to remain associated with the DNA at the target site, hydrolyzing copious amounts of ATP. As a result, for the past 35 years type I restriction endonucleases could only be loosely classified as enzymes since they functioned stoichiometrically relative to DNA. To further understand enzyme mechanism, a detailed analysis of DNA cleavage by the EcoR124I holoenzyme was done. We demonstrate for the first time that type I restriction endonucleases are not stoichiometric but are instead catalytic with respect to DNA. Further, the mechanism involves formation of a dimer of holoenzymes, with each monomer bound to a target sequence and, following cleavage, each dissociates in an intact form to bind and restrict subsequent DNA molecules. Therefore, type I restriction endonucleases, like their type II counterparts, are true enzymes. The conclusion that type I restriction enzymes are catalytic relative to DNA has important implications for the in vivo function of these previously enigmatic enzymes.