Development of multiple cloning site cis-vectors for recombinant adeno-associated virus production

Recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) has become a very popular gene therapy vector in the past several years. A cis-plasmid is used to generate the rAAV stocks. In this plasmid, the entire expression cassette is incorporated between two AAV inverted terminal repeats. The construction of cis-plasmid has been problematic because of the high-frequency recombination of the viral inverted terminal repeats. Here we describe the design and construction of several multiple cloning site cis-plasmids that are driven by five different promoters, including the ubiquitous cytomegalovirus enhancer/chicken beta-actin (CAG), cytomegalovirus (CMV), rous sarcoma virus (RSV), simian virus 40 (SV40), and a muscle-specific promoter (CK6). The application of these multiple cloning site cis-plasmids improves the cloning efficiency. As an example of the utilization of these multiple cloning site vectors, the prokaryotic beta-galactosidase cDNA was cloned in the multiple cloning site cis-plasmids. High-level rAAV-mediated beta-galactosidase expression was achieved in HeLa cells from CAG, CMV, RSV and SV40 promoters, respectively, but notfrom the CK6 promoter. In vivo application in the adult mdx mouse (mouse model for Duchenne muscular dystrophy) muscle revealed efficient transgene expression from CMV and CK6 promoters, followed by CAG and RSV promoters. The SV40 promoter was the least efficient.     

Sequence requirements for plasmid nuclear import

The nuclear envelope is a major barrier for nuclear uptake of plasmids and represents one of the most significant unsolved problems of nonviral gene delivery. We have previously shown that the nuclear entry of plasmid DNA is sequence-specific, requiring a 366-bp fragment containing the SV40 origin of replication and early promoter. In this report, we show that, although fragments throughout this region can support varying degrees of nuclear import, the 72-bp repeats of the SV40 enhancer facilitate maximal transport. The functions of the promoter and the origin of replication are not needed for nuclear localization of plasmid DNA. In contrast to the import activity of the SV40 enhancer, two other strong promoter and enhancer sequences, the human cytomegalovirus (CMV) immediate-early promoter and the Rous sarcoma virus LTR, were unable to direct nuclear localization of plasmids. The inability of the CMV promoter to mediate plasmid nuclear import was confirmed by measurement of the CMV promoter-driven expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP) in microinjected cells. At times before cell division, as few as 3 to 10 copies per cell of cytoplasmically injected plasmids containing the SV40 enhancer gave significant GFP expression, while no expression was obtained with more than 1000 copies per cell of plasmids lacking the SV40 sequence. However, the levels of expression were the same for both plasmids after cell division in cytoplasmically injected cells and at all times in nuclear injected cells. Thus, the inclusion this SV40 sequence in nonviral vectors may greatly increase their ability to be transported into the nucleus, especially in nondividing cells.     

Comparison of CMV, RSV, SV40 viral and Vlambda1 cellular promoters in B and T lymphoid and non-lymphoid cell lines.

Determining the activity of viral and cellular regulatory elements in B or T lymphoid cell lines would facilitate appropriate utilization of the regulatory sequences for gene transfer- and expression-dependent applications. We have compared the activity of the CMV, RSV and SV40 viral promoter/enhancers as well as the Vlambda1 cellular promoter, in three B cell lines (REH, SMS-SB, C3P), three T cell lines (CEM, Jurkat, ST-F10), and two non-lymphoid cell lines (K-562, HeLa) using the luciferase reporter gene. In B cell lines, the activity of the CMV promoter/enhancer construct was the highest ranging from 10- to 113-fold greater than that of SV40. In contrast, in T cell lines the RSV promoter/enhancer activity was 11-65-fold higher than that of SV40. The Vlambda1 promoter activity was close to that of SV40 promoter/enhancer in most of the cell lines tested. We conclude that CMV and RSV promoter/enhancers contain stronger regulatory elements than do the SV40 and Vlambda1 for expression of genes in lymphoid cell lines.     

The Pacific White Shrimp β-actin Promoter: Functional Properties and the Potential Application for Transduction System Using Recombinant Baculovirus

A newly isolated Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) beta-actin promoter SbaP and its derivative compact construct SbaP (ENX) have recently been demonstrated to promote ectopic gene expression in vitro and in vivo. To further explore the potential transduction application, this newly isolated shrimp promoter SbaP was comparatively tested with cytomegalovirus (CMV), simian virus 40 (SV40), polyhedrin (Polh), and white spot syndrome virus immediate early gene 1 (WSSV ie1) four constitutive promoters and a beta-actin promoter (TbaP) from tilapia fish to characterize its promoting function in eight different cell lines. Luciferase quantitation assays revealed that SbaP can drive luciferase gene expression in all eight cell lines including sf21 (insect), PAC2 (zebrafish), EPC (carp), CHSE-214 (chinook salmon), GSTEF (green sea turtle), MS-1 (monk seal), 293T (human), and HeLa (human), but at different levels. Comparative analysis revealed that the promoting activity of SbaP was lower (≤10-fold) than CMV but higher (2–20 folds) than Polh in most of these cell lines tested. Whereas, SbaP mediated luciferase expression in sf21 cells was over 20-fold higher than CMV, SV40, Polh, and TbaP promoter. Compared to the SbaP, SbaP (ENX), which was constructed on the basis of SbaP by deletion of two “negative” regulatory elements, exhibited no significant change of promoting activity in EPC and PAC2 cells, but a 5 and 16 % lower promoting effect in 293T and HeLa cells, respectively. Additionally, a recombinant baculovirus was constructed under the control of SbaP (ENX), and efficient promoter activity of newly generated baculoviral vector was detected both in vitro of infected sf21 cells and in vivo of injected indicator shrimp. These results warrant the potential application of SbaP, particularly SbaP (ENX) in ectopic gene expression in future.     

SV40 intron,a potent strong intron element that effectively increases transgene expression in transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells

Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells have become the most widely utilized mammalian cell line for the production of recombinant proteins. However, the product yield and transgene instability need to be further increased and solved. In this study, we investigated the effect of five different introns on transgene expression in CHO cells. hCMV intron A, adenovirus tripartite leader sequence intron, SV40 intron, Chinese hamster EF‐1alpha gene intron 1 and intervening sequence intron were cloned downstream of the eGFP expression cassette in a eukaryotic vector, which was then transfected into CHO cells. qRT‐PCR and flow cytometry were used to explore eGFP expression levels. And gene copy number was also detected by qPCR, respectively. Furthermore, the erythropoietin (EPO) protein was used to test the selected more strong intron. The results showed that SV40 intron exhibited the highest transgene expression level among the five compared intron elements under transient and stable transfections. In addition, the SV40 intron element can increase the ratio of positive colonies and decrease the coefficient of variation in transgene expression level. Moreover, the transgene expression level was not related to the gene copy number in stable transfected CHO cells. Also, the SV40 intron induced higher level of EPO expression than IVS intron in transfected CHO cell. In conclusion, SV40 intron is a potent strong intron element that increases transgene expression, which can readily be used to more efficient transgenic protein production in CHO cells.     

Comparison of promoter region constructs for in vivo intramuscular expression

BACKGROUND: High transgene expression is generally expected after gene transfer. However, different level, kinetics and localization of expression might be needed for relevant therapeutic applications. Former studies have compared various promoter regions driving gene expression leading to conflicting results. In the present work, two promoter families have been compared using the efficient in vivo intramuscular electrotransfer technique. METHODS: Three promoter regions were constructed by associating the strong ubiquitous cytomegalovirus (CMV) enhancer-promoter to its homologous intron A or to a heterologous intron, or to a hybrid intron. Promoter regions derived from the muscle creatine kinase (MCK) promoter were also studied. The expression of the same transgene (SeAP or neurotrophin-3) under control of these different promoters was compared after plasmid electrotransfer in mouse tibialis-cranialis skeletal muscle. RESULTS: Heterologous intron association to the CMV promoter did not modify gene expression kinetics nor increase gene expression level. Usefulness of intron A or hybrid intron association to the CMV promoter depended on the gene. The various MCK promoters drove efficient gene expression but lower than that obtained with the CMV promoter. Furthermore, peak value was reached earlier with MCK promoter regions (14 days). CONCLUSION: For applications of gene transfer restricted to skeletal muscle, the MCK promoter or a MCK promoter variant would be a promising alternative to the CMV promoter. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that the use of MCK promoter limits humoral and cell-mediated immune responses. Furthermore, the MCK promoter decreases the initial expression peak that may be detrimental, drives a sustained gene expression, and improves gene transfer safety.     

Three individual regulatory elements of the promoter positively activate the transcription of the murine gene encoding granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

At least three regulatory elements GPE1, GPE2 and GPE3 (G-CSF promoter elements) controlling the gene (G-CSF) encoding granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) are indispensable for the constitutive expression of the G-CSF gene in human CHU-2 cells and for its lipopolysaccharide(LPS)-inducible expression in macrophages. The enhancer activities of each regulatory element were examined with or without the SV40 enhancer element placed downstream from the reporter gene. A GPE1 tetramer mediated the constitutive expression in CHU-2 cells, and the LPS-inducible expression in macrophage cell lines, while the GPE2 element was active in CHU-2 and LPS-treated macrophage cell lines only in combination with the SV40 enhancer. A GPE3 tetramer had efficient enhancer activity in CHU-2 cells but not in macrophage cell lines without the SV40 enhancer. In combination with the SV40 enhancer, GPE3 worked as an LPS-inducible enhancer element in macrophage BAM3 cells. Gel retardation assay indicated that the CHU-2 and the macrophage cells contained nuclear factors which specifically bound to each GPE sequence.     

Hepatocyte-specific gene expression from integrated lentiviral vectors

BACKGROUND: For many applications, efficient gene therapy will require long-term, organ-specific therapeutic gene expression. Lentiviral vectors based on HIV-1 are promising gene delivery vehicles due to their ability to integrate transgenes into non-dividing cells. Many experimental vectors express transgenes under the control of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) immediate-early gene promoter. Although this promoter directs strong gene expression in vitro, it may be shut off rapidly in vivo. This study explores the potential of HIV-1-based vectors to transduce hepatocytes and compares gene expression from different promoters in integrated vectors. METHODS: HIV-1-based vector plasmids expressing the green fluorescent protein (GFP) under the control of the CMV promoter, the alpha-1 antitrypsin gene promoter or promoters derived from the hepatitis B virus (HBV) genome were used to compare expression in transfected and transduced cell lines. RESULTS: Hepatocyte cell lines differed strikingly in their transfectability. Transduction with replication-deficient HIV-1-based vector particles incorporating the different promoter elements was uniformly effective in hepatocyte and non-hepatocyte lines. However, in hepatocytes, only the CMV, alpha-1 antitrypsin and HBV core but not HBV surface promoters were able to produce GFP expression. Addition of the HBV enhancer 2 element improved the transducing ability of the HBV surface promoter and suppressed expression in non-hepatocytes increasing specificity for hepatocytes. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated lentiviral vectors can be used to direct transgene expression in liver cells both promiscuously and specifically. Promoters derived from the alpha-1 antitrypsin gene or HBV are alternatives to the CMV promoter. Inclusion of the HBV enhancer 2 permits strong liver-specific gene expression in vitro.