RXR alpha, a promiscuous partner of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptors.

Retinoic acid receptor (RAR), thyroid hormone receptor (T3R) and vitamin D3 receptor (VD3R) differ from steroid hormone receptors in that they bind and transactivate through responsive elements organized as direct rather than inverted repeats. We now show that recombinant RAR and T3R are monomers in solution and cannot form stable homodimeric complexes on their responsive elements. Stable binding of the receptors to their responsive elements requires heterodimerization with a nuclear factor. This auxiliary factor is tightly associated with RAR and T3R in the absence of DNA and co-purifies with both receptors. As demonstrated by extensive purification, the same auxiliary factor is required for stable DNA binding of RAR as for that of T3R; the factor also facilitates the formation of a stable VD3R-DNA complex. The auxiliary factor is identical to the retinoid X receptor alpha (RXR alpha) by biochemical and functional criteria. The identification of RXR alpha as a dimerization partner for the RARs, T3Rs and VD3R has important implications as to the function of these receptors and their ligands in development, homeostasis and neoplasia.     

Differential capacity of wild type promoter elements for binding and trans-activation by retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptors.

Retinoic acid receptor (RAR) and thyroid hormone receptor (T3R) are structurally similar and can bind as homodimers or T3R-RAR heterodimers to a single synthetic DNA response element. The interaction of these two types of receptors with wild type elements, however, has not been systematically investigated. Promoter elements from genes regulated by retinoic acid (RA) or thyroid hormone (T3) were tested for response to T3 and RA in transient transfections in both JEG and COS cells. The elements were classified as primarily responsive to RA or to T3 or responsive to both ligands. Binding of highly purified RAR alpha and T3R alpha to the various elements was assessed using the gel shift assay. Those elements predominantly responsive to one ligand showed preferential binding to the appropriate receptor. A series of point mutations were introduced into the rat GH T3 response element to further define sequence requirements for response to both RA and T3. Down-mutations in any of the three hexamers (previously demonstrated to be required for full response to T3 and full binding of T3R) also decreased RA induction and RAR binding. However, only one of two sets of up-mutations for T3 response also increased RA induction, demonstrating differences in hexamer preference between RAR and T3R. Variation in spacing of the three hexamers did not influence RA vs. T3 induction or RAR vs. T3R binding according to the predictions of a simple hexamer spacing model. There was a strong correlation between the extent of T3R dimer binding and strength of T3 induction for a subset of elements studied in JEG cells (r = 0.97, P < 0.01) and a weaker but significant correlation in COS cells (r = 0.65, P < 0.05)). In contrast, RAR dimer binding by the wild type elements did not quantitatively correlate with RA induction in either JEG (r = 0.13, P > 0.05) or COS cells (r = 0.21, P > 0.05). These results suggests that RAR interacts with a heterodimer partner(s) which influences binding site specificity, whereas T3R heterodimer partner(s) is less likely to alter binding site recognition. The observed difference in COS and JEG cells as well as the weak T3R binding-function relationship of the malic enzyme element, however, suggest that the influence of T3R heterodimer partner(s) on binding site specificity is likely to vary with cell type and the specific element tested.     

Dimerization interfaces formed between the DNA binding domains determine the cooperative binding of RXR/RAR and RXR/TR heterodimers to DR5 and DR4 elements.

We have previously reported that the binding site repertoires of heterodimers formed between retinoid X receptor (RXR) and either retinoic acid receptor (RAR) or thyroid hormone receptor (TR) bound to response elements consisting of directly repeated PuG(G/T)TCA motifs spaced by 1-5 bp [direct repeat (DR) elements 1-5] are highly similar to those of their corresponding DNA binding domains (DBDs). We have now mapped the dimerization surfaces located in the DBDs of RXR, RAR and TR, which are responsible for cooperative interaction on DR4 (RXR and TR) and DR5 (RXR and RAR). The D-box of the C-terminal CII finger of RXR provides one of the surfaces which is specifically required for the formation of the heterodimerization interfaces on both DR4 and DR5. Heterodimerization with the RXR DBD on DR5 specifically requires the tip of the RAR CI finger as the complementary surface, while a 7 amino acid sequence encompassing the 'prefinger region', but not the TR CI finger, is specifically required for efficient dimerization of TR and RXR DBDs on DR4. Importantly, DBD swapping experiments demonstrate not only that the binding site repertoires of the full-length receptors are dictated by those of their DBDs, but also that the formation of distinct dimerization interfaces between the DBDs are the critical determinants for cooperative DNA binding of these receptors to specific DRs.     

The patterns of binding of RAR, RXR and TR homo- and heterodimers to direct repeats are dictated by the binding specificites of the DNA binding domains.

We show here that, in addition to generating an increase in DNA binding efficiency, heterodimerization of retinoid X receptor (RXR) with either retinoic acid receptor (RAR) or thyroid hormone receptor (TR) alters the binding site repertoires of RAR, RXR and TR homodimers. The binding site specificities of both homo- and heterodimers appear to be largely determined by their DNA binding domains (DBDs), and are dictated by (i) homocooperative DNA binding of the RXR DBD, (ii) heterocooperative DNA binding of RXR/RAR and RXR/TR DBDs, and (iii) steric hindrance. No homodimerization domain exists in the DBDs of TR and RAR. The dimerization function which is located in the ligand binding domain further stabilizes, but in general does not change, the repertoire dictated by the corresponding DBD(s). The binding repertoire can be further modified by the actual sequence of the binding site. We also provide evidence supporting the view that the cooperative binding of the RXR/RAR and RXR/TR DBDs to directly repeated elements is anisotropic, with interactions between the dimerization interfaces occurring only with RXR bound to the 5' located motif. This polarity, which appears to be maintained in the full-length receptor heterodimers, may constitute a novel parameter in promoter-specific transactivation.