SCF targets cyclin E2 for ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis

E-type cyclins (E1 and E2) regulate the S phase program in the mammalian cell division cycle. Expression of cyclin E1 and E2 is frequently deregulated in a variety of cancer types and a wealth of experimental evidence supports an oncogenic role of these proteins in human tumorigenesis. Although the molecular mechanisms responsible for cyclin E1 deregulation in cancer are well defined, little is known regarding cyclin E2. Here we report that cyclin E2 is targeted for ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis by the ubiquitin ligase SCF^Fbxw7/hCdc4. Ubiquitylation is triggered by phosphorylation of cyclin E2 on residues Thr392 and Ser396, and to a lesser extent Thr74, contained in two consensus Cdc4-phosphodegrons. Furthermore, we found that ectopic expression of cyclin E1 enhances the ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis of cyclin E2 in vivo, suggesting a potential cross-talk in the regulation of E-type cyclin activity. Since SCF^Fbxw7/hCdc4 is functionally inactivated in several human cancer types, alteration of this molecular pathway could contribute to the deregulation of cyclin E2 in tumorigenesis.     

Mammalian E-type Cyclins Control Chromosome Pairing,Telomere Stability and CDK2 Localization in Male Meiosis

Loss of function of cyclin E1 or E2, important regulators of the mitotic cell cycle, yields viable mice, but E2-deficient males display reduced fertility. To elucidate the role of E-type cyclins during spermatogenesis, we characterized their expression patterns and produced additional deletions of Ccne1 and Ccne2 alleles in the germline, revealing unexpected meiotic functions. While Ccne2 mRNA and protein are abundantly expressed in spermatocytes, Ccne1 mRNA is present but its protein is detected only at low levels. However, abundant levels of cyclin E1 protein are detected in spermatocytes deficient in cyclin E2 protein. Additional depletion of E-type cyclins in the germline resulted in increasingly enhanced spermatogenic abnormalities and corresponding decreased fertility and loss of germ cells by apoptosis. Profound meiotic defects were observed in spermatocytes, including abnormal pairing and synapsis of homologous chromosomes, heterologous chromosome associations, unrepaired double-strand DNA breaks, disruptions in telomeric structure and defects in cyclin-dependent-kinase 2 localization. These results highlight a new role for E-type cyclins as important regulators of male meiosis.     

Differences in degradation lead to asynchronous expression of cyclin E1 and cyclin E2 in cancer cells

Cyclin E1 is expressed at the G₁/S phase transition of the cell cycle to drive the initiation of DNA replication and is degraded during S/G₂M. Deregulation of its periodic degradation is observed in cancer and is associated with increased proliferation and genomic instability. We identify that in cancer cells, unlike normal cells, the closely related protein cyclin E2 is expressed predominantly in S phase, concurrent with DNA replication. This occurs at least in part because the ubiquitin ligase component that is responsible for cyclin E1 downregulation in S phase, Fbw7, fails to effectively target cyclin E2 for proteosomal degradation. The distinct cell cycle expression of the two E-type cyclins in cancer cells has implications for their roles in genomic instability and proliferation and may explain their associations with different signatures of disease.     

Developmental downregulation of Xenopus cyclin E is phosphorylation and nuclear import dependent and is mediated by ubiquitination

Cyclins are regulatory subunits that bind to and activate catalytic Cdks. Cyclin E associates with Cdk2 to mediate the G1/S transition of the cell cycle. Cyclin E is overexpressed in breast, lung, skin, gastrointestinal, cervical, and ovarian cancers. Its overexpression correlates with poor patient prognosis and is involved in the etiology of breast cancer. We have been studying how cyclin E is normally downregulated during development in order to determine if disruption of similar mechanisms could either contribute to its overexpression in cancer, or be exploited to decrease its expression. In Xenopus laevis embryos, cyclin E protein level is high and constant until its abrupt destabilization by an undefined mechanism after the 12th cell cycle, which corresponds to the midblastula transition (MBT) and remodeling of the embryonic to the adult cell cycle. Since degradation of mammalian cyclin E is regulated by the ubiquitin proteasome system and is phosphorylation dependent, we examined the role of phosphorylation in Xenopus cyclin E turnover. We show that similarly to human cyclin E, phosphorylation of serine 398 and threonine 394 plays a role in cyclin E turnover at the MBT. Immunofluorescence analysis shows that cyclin E relocalizes from the cytoplasm to the nucleus preceding its degradation. When nuclear import is inhibited, cyclin E stability is markedly increased after the MBT. To investigate whether degradation of Xenopus cyclin E is mediated by the proteasomal pathway, we used proteasome inhibitors and observed a progressive accumulation of cyclin E in the cytoplasm after the MBT. Ubiquitination of cyclin E precedes its proteasomal degradation at the MBT. These results show that cyclin E destruction at the MBT requires both phosphorylation and nuclear import, as well as proteasomal activity.     

Cyclin E2, the cycle continues

The eukaryotic cell cycle is regulated by a family of serine/threonine protein kinases known as cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). The activation of a CDK is dependent on its association with a cyclin regulatory subunit. The formation of distinct cyclin-CDK complexes controls the progression through the first gap phase (G(1)) and initiation of DNA synthesis (S phase). These complexes are in turn regulated by protein phosphorylation and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CKIs). Cyclin E2 has emerged as the second member of the E-type cyclin family. Cyclin E2-associated kinase activity is regulated in a cell cycle dependent manner with peak activity at the G(1) to S transition. Ectopic expression of cyclin E2 in human cells accelerates G(1), suggesting that cyclin E2 is rate limiting for G(1) progression. Although the pattern and level of cyclin E2 expression in some primary tumor and normal tissue RNAs are distinct from cyclin E1, both E-type cyclins appear to have inherent functional redundancies. This functional redundancy has facilitated the rapid characterization of cyclin E2 and uncovered unique features associated with each E-type cyclin.     

A Cdc2-sensitive interaction of the UbL domain of XDRP1S with cyclin B mediates the degradation of cyclin B in Xenopus egg extracts

The yeast UbL-UBA protein Dsk2 is thought to act as a shuttle protein that delivers polyubiquitinated proteins to the proteasome. Previously, we identified Xenopus Dsk2-related protein, XDRP1, as a cyclin A-interacting protein. Using Xenopus egg extracts, we further characterized its two isoforms, XDRP1L and XDRP1S, with respect to cyclin binding and its degradation. Polyubiquitinated cyclins bound to the UBA domain of XDRP1L and XDRP1S, whereas monomeric cyclins A and B bound to the UbL domain of XDRP1S but not to XDRP1L. Binding of XDRP1S with monomeric cyclins was affected by a Cdc2-mediated phosphorylation of either the XDRP1S UbL domain or cyclins. Degradation of cyclin B was also prevented by XDRP1S in a Cdc2-sensitive manner. Loss of the XDRP1S-cyclin interaction allowed cyclins to be degraded in calcium-treated CSF extracts. These results suggest that the shuttling pathway via the UbL-UBA protein XDRP1 participates in degradation of mitotic cyclins in Xenopus eggs.     

Kinase-independent function of cyclin E

E-type cyclins are thought to drive cell-cycle progression by activating cyclin-dependent kinases, primarily CDK2. We previously found that cyclin E-null cells failed to incorporate MCM helicase into DNA prereplication complex during G(0) --> S phase progression. We now report that a kinase-deficient cyclin E mutant can partially restore MCM loading and S phase entry in cyclin E-null cells. We found that cyclin E is loaded onto chromatin during G(0) --> S progression. In the absence of cyclin E, CDT1 is normally loaded onto chromatin, whereas MCM is not, indicating that cyclin E acts between CDT1 and MCM loading. We observed a physical association of cyclin E with CDT1 and with MCMs. We propose that cyclin E facilitates MCM loading in a kinase-independent fashion, through physical interaction with CDT1 and MCM. Our work indicates that-in addition to their function as CDK activators-E cyclins play kinase-independent functions in cell-cycle progression.     

Mammalian Cell Cycles without Cyclin E-CDK2

The family of mammalian E-type cyclins is composed of two proteins, termed cyclin E1 and E2. These two cyclins are widely expressed in proliferating cells. E-cyclins bind and activate cyclin dependent kinase CDK2. Cyclin E-CDK2 complexes were believed to play critical function in driving cell cycle progression of normal, nontransformed cells and of cancer cells. Several recent reports challenge this notion.     

Mammalian cell cycles without cyclin E-CDK2

The family of mammalian E-type cyclins is composed of two proteins, termed cyclin E1 and E2. These two cyclins are widely expressed in proliferating cells. E-cyclins bind and activate cyclin dependent kinase CDK2. Cyclin E-CDK2 complexes were believed to play critical function in driving cell cycle progression of normal, nontransformed cells and of cancer cells. Several recent reports challenge this notion.     

Structural basis for the ORC1‐Cyclin A association

Progression of cell cycle is regulated by sequential expression of cyclins, which associate with distinct cyclin kinases to drive the transition between different cell cycle phases. The complex of Cyclin A with cyclin‐dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) controls the DNA replication activity through phosphorylation of a set of chromatin factors, which critically influences the S phase transition. It has been shown that the direct interaction between the Cyclin A‐CDK2 complex and origin recognition complex subunit 1 (ORC1) mediates the localization of ORC1 to centrosomes, where ORC1 inhibits cyclin E‐mediated centrosome reduplication. However, the molecular basis underlying the specific recognition between ORC1 and cyclins remains elusive. Here we report the crystal structure of Cyclin A‐CDK2 complex bound to a peptide derived from ORC1 at 2.54 å resolution. The structure revealed that the ORC1 peptide interacts with a hydrophobic groove, termed cyclin binding groove (CBG), of Cyclin A via a KXL motif. Distinct from other identified CBG‐binding sequences, an arginine residue flanking the KXL motif of ORC1 inserts into a neighboring acidic pocket, contributing to the strong ORC1‐Cyclin A association. Furthermore, structural and sequence analysis of cyclins reveals divergence on the ORC1‐binding sites, which may underpin their differential ORC1‐binding activities. This study provides a structural basis of the specific ORC1‐cyclins recognition, with implication in development of novel inhibitors against the cyclin/CDK complexes.     

Distinct properties of cyclin-dependent kinase complexes containing cyclin A1 and cyclin A2

The distinct expression patterns of the two A-type cyclins during spermatogenesis and the absolute requirement for cyclin A1 in this biological process in vivo suggest that they may confer distinct biochemical properties to their CDK partners. We therefore compared human cyclin A1- and cyclin A2-containing CDK complexes in vitro by determining kinetic constants and by examining the complexes for their ability to phosphorylate pRb and p53. Differences in biochemical activity were observed in CDK2 but not CDK1 when complexed with cyclin A1 versus cyclin A2. Further, CDK1/cyclin A1 is a better kinase complex for phosphorylating potentially physiologically relevant substrates pRb and p53 than CDK2/cyclin A2. The activity of CDKs can therefore be regulated depending upon which A-type cyclin they bind and CDK1/cyclin A1 might be preferred in vivo.     

Differential regulation of cyclin D1 and D3 expression in the control of astrocyte proliferation induced by endothelin-1

We have previously shown that the mitogenic effect of endothelin-1 (ET-1) in primary astrocytes is dependent on activation of both extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)- and cytoskeleton (CSK)-dependent pathways. In this study, we evaluated the contribution of each of these pathways to the expression and activation of proteins mediating cell cycle progression. Our results suggest that ET-1-induced expression of cyclins D1 and D3 is dependent on the ERK- and CSK-dependent pathways, respectively; moreover, a decrease in the levels of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (CKI) p27 was observed as a consequence of ERK activation. Expression of both cyclins D1 and D3 together with a decrease in the p27 levels are essential for retinoblastoma protein (pRB) phosphorylation and cyclin A expression. Furthermore, the molecular events responsible for cell-cell contact inhibition of astrocyte proliferation were found to be independent of the mitogenic pathways leading to D-type cyclin expression. Cell growth arrest in confluent astrocytes was found to be correlated with increased expression of CKI p21, resulting in inhibition of D-type cyclin-associated pRB phosphorylation and cyclin A expression. Taken together, these results indicate that cyclins D1 and D3, which constitute the key mediators of the proliferative response of primary astrocytes to ET-1, are regulated by distinct signaling pathways.     

Developing a cyclin blueprint as a tool for mapping the cell cycle in GS-NS0

The cell cycle is at the center of growth, productivity, and death of mammalian cell cultures. There exists a need to identify and quantify major landmarks in the cell cycle of industrially relevant mammalian cell lines and its association with productivity; central for designing productivity optimization strategies. Herein, we studied the expression of three cyclins, under both perturbed and unperturbed growth, by flow cytometry in batch cultures of GS-NS0. The perturbed systems involved two different DNA synthesis inhibitors, thymidine and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). This approach enables the establishment of characteristic cyclin profiles, timings, and thresholds. In particular, two G₁ class cyclins (D1 and E1), and one G₂ cyclin (B1) were investigated. Cyclin B1 showed a clear cell cycle phase-specific expression increasing during G₂ phase where it was approximately 40% higher when compared to G₁ phase. Similarly, cyclin E1 showed a clear pattern being expressed approximately 10% higher in G₁ compared to G₂ phase and decreased through S phase. Cyclin D1 expression was fairly invariable throughout the cell cycle phases. The observed patterns provide a blueprint of the cell line's cell cycle, which can be used for the development of biologically accurate and experimentally validated distributed cell cycle models.     

Cyclin B Dissociation from CDK1 Precedes its Degradation Upon MPF Inactivation in Mitotic Extracts of Xenopus laevis Embryos

Cyclin B is a regulatory subunit of CDK1 within MPF complex. Degradation of cyclin B via ubiquitin-proteasome pathway seemed to be absolutely required for the M-phase exit. However, inhibition of the proteasome proteolytic activity upon the exit from the meiotic metaphase II-arrest in Xenopus cell-free extract revealed that the proteasome-dependent dissociation of cyclin B from CDK1 is sufficient to inactivate MPF without cyclin B degradation. In this study we analyse whether the same mechanism operates during the exit from mitotic M-phase. We show in Xenopus cell-free extract undergoing the first or the second embryonic mitosis that CDK1 oscillations are not affected by proteasome inhibition with MG132 or ALLN despite effective inhibition of cyclins B degradation. The majority of cyclins B1 and B2 surviving CDK1 inactivation is CDK-free and cyclin B2 becomes resistant to phosphatase ? dephosphorylation. The pool of cyclins B remaining after CDK1 inactivation in the presence of MG132 is mitotically inert, while exogenous or newly synthesised cyclin B activates CDK1. This suggests that cyclins B remain sequestered within the proteasome upon MPF inactivation in the presence of MG132. Comparison of the dynamics of the decline of total and CDK-bound pools of cyclins B1, B2 and B4 upon mitotic exit in absence of protein synthesis reveals that CDK-bound cyclins B diminish clearly faster. Our results thus show that cyclin B dissociation from CDK1 precedes cyclins B degradation upon CDK1 inactivation in mitotic embryo extracts and that proteasome proteolytic activity is dispensable for both activation and inactivation of CDK1 in such extracts.     

Integrin Signaling at the M/G1 Transition Induces Expression of Cyclin E

The activities of the mammalian G1 cyclins, cyclin D and cyclin E, during cell cycle progression (G1/S) are believed to be regulated by cell attachment and the presence of growth factors. In order to study the importance of cell attachment and concomitant integrin signaling on the expression of G1 cyclins during the natural adhesion process from mitosis to interphase, protein expression was monitored in cells that were synchronized by mitotic shake off. Here we show that in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) and neuroblastoma (N2A) cells, expression of cyclin E at the M/G1 transition is regulated by both growth factors and cell attachment, while expression of cyclin D seems to be entirely dependent on the presence of serum. Expression of cyclin E appears to be correlated with the phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein, suggesting a link with the activity of the cyclin D/cdk4 complex. Expression of the cdk inhibitors p21^cip1/Waf1 and p27^Kip1 is not changed upon serum depletion or detachment of cells during early G1, suggesting no direct role for these CKIs in the regulation of cyclin activity. Although inhibition of cyclin E/cdk2 kinase activity has been reported previously, this is the first time that cyclin E expression is shown to be dependent on cell attachment.     

Regulation of IGF-1-dependent cyclin D1 and E expression by hEag1 channels in MCF-7 cells: The critical role of hEag1 channels in G1 phase progression

Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) plays a key role in breast cancer development and cell cycle regulation. It has been demonstrated that IGF-1 stimulates cyclin expression, thus regulating the G1 to S phase transition of the cell cycle. Potassium (K⁺) channels are involved in the G1 phase progression of the cell cycle induced by growth factors. However, mechanisms that allow growth factors to cooperate with K⁺ channels in order to modulate the G1 phase progression and cyclin expression remain unknown. Here, we focused on hEag1 K⁺ channels which are over-expressed in breast cancer and are involved in the G1 phase progression of breast cancer cells (MCF-7). As expected, IGF-1 increased cyclin D1 and E expression of MCF-7 cells in a cyclic manner, whereas the increase of CDK4 and 2 levels was sustained. IGF-1 stimulated p21^WAF1/Cip1 expression with a kinetic similar to that of cyclin D1, however p27^Kip1 expression was insensitive to IGF-1. Interestingly, astemizole, a blocker of hEag1 channels, but not E4031, a blocker of HERG channels, inhibited the expression of both cyclins after 6-8 h of co-stimulation with IGF-1. However, astemizole failed to modulate CDK4, CDK2, p21^WAF1/Cip1 and p27^Kip1 expression. The down-regulation of hEag1 by siRNA provoked a decrease in cyclin expression. This study is the first to demonstrate that K⁺ channels such as hEag1 are directly involved in the IGF-1-induced up-regulation of cyclin D1 and E expression in MCF-7 cells. By identifying more specifically the temporal position of the arrest site induced by the inhibition of hEag1 channels, we confirmed that hEag1 activity is predominantly upstream of the arrest site induced by serum-deprivation, prior to the up-regulation of both cyclins D1 and E.