Genetic evidence for functional dependency of p18Ink4c on Cdk4

The INK4 family of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors negatively regulates cyclin D-dependent CDK4 and CDK6 and induces the growth-suppressive function of Rb family proteins. Mutations in the Cdk4 gene conferring INK4 resistance are associated with familial and sporadic melanoma in humans and result in a wide spectrum of tumors in mice, suggesting that INK4 is a major regulator of CDK4. Mice lacking the Cdk4 gene exhibit various defects in many organs associated with hypocellularity, whereas loss of the p18(Ink4c) gene results in widespread hyperplasia and organomegaly. To genetically test the notion that the function of INK4 is dependent on CDK4, we generated p18; Cdk4 double-mutant mice and examined the organs and tissues which developed abnormalities when either gene is deleted. We show here that, in all organs we have examined, including pituitary, testis, pancreas, kidney, and adrenal gland, hyperproliferative phenotypes associated with p18 loss were canceled. The double-mutant mice exhibited phenotypes very close to or indistinguishable from that of Cdk4 single-mutant mice. Mice lacking p27(Kip1) develop widespread hyperplasia and organomegaly similar to those developed by p18-deficient mice. The p27; Cdk4 double-mutant mice, however, displayed phenotypes intermediate between those of p27 and Cdk4 single-mutant mice. These results provide genetic evidence that in mice p18(Ink4c) and p27(Kip1) mediate the transduction of different cell growth and proliferation signals to CDK4 and that p18(Ink4c) is functionally dependent on CDK4.     

Cooperation of p27(Kip1) and p18(INK4c) in progestin-mediated cell cycle arrest in T-47D breast cancer cells

The steroid hormone progesterone regulates proliferation and differentiation in the mammary gland and uterus by cell cycle phase-specific actions. The long-term effect of progestins on T-47D breast cancer cells is inhibition of cellular proliferation. This is accompanied by decreased G(1) cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) activities, redistribution of the CDK inhibitor p27(Kip1) among these CDK complexes, and alterations in the elution profile of cyclin E-Cdk2 upon gel filtration chromatography, such that high-molecular-weight complexes predominate. This study aimed to determine the relative contribution of CDK inhibitors to these events. Following progestin treatment, the majority of cyclin E- and D-CDK complexes were bound to p27(Kip1) and few were bound to p21(Cip1). In vitro, recombinant His(6)-p27 could quantitatively reproduce the effects on cyclin E-Cdk2 kinase activity and the shift in molecular weight observed following progestin treatment. In contrast, cyclin D-Cdk4 was not inhibited by His(6)-p27 in vitro or p27(Kip1) in vivo. However, an increase in the expression of the Cdk4/6 inhibitor p18(INK4c) and its extensive association with Cdk4 and Cdk6 were apparent following progestin treatment. Recombinant p18(INK4c) led to the reassortment of cyclin-CDK-CDK inhibitor complexes in vitro, with consequent decrease in cyclin E-Cdk2 activity. These results suggest a concerted model of progestin action whereby p27(Kip1) and p18(INK4c) cooperate to inhibit cyclin E-Cdk2 and Cdk4. Since similar models have been developed for growth inhibition by transforming growth factor beta and during adipogenesis, interaction between the Cip/Kip and INK4 families of inhibitors may be a common theme in physiological growth arrest and differentiation.     

Structural analysis of the inhibition of Cdk4 and Cdk6 by p16(INK4a) through molecular dynamics simulations

Cyclin-dependent kinases 4, 6 and 2 (Cdk4/6/2), are proteins that lead progression through the G1-S transition, a step strictly regulated in the process of cell proliferation. The p16(INK4a) tumor suppressor, whose expression is inhibited in a high number of cancers, binds to Cdk4/6 and inhibits phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein, forcing cells to remain in the G1 phase and therefore, arresting cell division. Accordingly, the design of small compounds mimicking the inhibition of p16(INK4a) appears to be a promising way to treat cancer. In order to get some insight into the key interactions governing recognition between different cyclin-dependent kinases and the p16(INK4a) tumor suppressor, the present work reports the results of molecular dynamics simulations of both, the Cdk6-p16(INK4a) complex and the Cdk4-p16(INK4a) complex, respectively at 300 K. Most of the key interactions observed, were already anticipated in the analysis of the crystal structure of Cdk6-p16(INK4a). However, a few different features found out from the analysis of these calculations provide a better understanding of the role of the T-loop conformation, a fragment of Cdks, and the way the ATP binding-site is distorted upon binding of p16(INK4a).     

Structural Analysis of the Inhibition of Cdk4 and Cdk6 by p16INK4a through Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Abstract

Cyclin-dependent kinases 4, 6 and 2 (Cdk4/6/2), are proteins that lead progression through the G1-S transition, a step strictly regulated in the process of cell proliferation. The p16^INK4a tumor suppressor, whose expression is inhibited in a high number of cancers, binds to Cdk4/6 and inhibits phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein, forcing cells to remain in the G1 phase and therefore, arresting cell division. Accordingly, the design of small compounds mimicking the inhibition of p16^INK4a appears to be a promising way to treat cancer. In order to get some insight into the key interactions governing recognition between different cyclin-dependent kinases and the p16^INK4a tumor suppressor, the present work reports the results of molecular dynamics simulations of both, the Cdk6-p16^INK4a complex and the Cdk4-p16^INK4a complex, respectively at 300 K. Most of the key interactions observed, were already anticipated in the analysis of the crystal structure of Cdk6-p16^INK4a. However, a few different features found out from the analysis of these calculations provide a better understanding of the role of the T-loop conformation, a fragment of Cdks, and the way the ATP binding-site is distorted upon binding of p16^INK4a.     

The expression of p18INK4 and p27kip1 cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors is regulated differently during human B cell differentiation

Cell cycle progression is under the control of cyclin-dependent kinases (cdks), the activity of which is dependent on the expression of specific cdk inhibitors. In this paper we report that the two cdk inhibitors, p27(Kip1) and p18(INK4c), are differently expressed and control different steps of human B lymphocyte activation. Resting B cells contain large amounts of p27(Kip1) and no p18(INK4c). In vitro stimulation by Staphylococcus aureus Cowan 1 strain or CD40 ligand associated with IL-10 and IL-2 induces a rapid decrease in p27(Kip1) expression combined with cell cycle entry and progression. In contrast, in vitro Ig production correlates with specific expression of p18(INK4c) and early G(1) arrest. This G(1) arrest is associated with inhibition of cyclin D3/cdk6-mediated retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation by p18(INK4c). A similar contrasting pattern of p18(INK4c) and p27(Kip1) expression is observed both in B cells activated in vivo and in various leukemic cells. Expression of p18(INK4c) was also detected in various Ig-secreting cell lines in which both maximum Ig secretion and specific p18(INK4c) expression were observed during the G(1) phase. Our study shows that p27(Kip1) and p18(INK4c) have different roles in B cell activation; p27(Kip1) is involved in the control of cell cycle entry, and p18(INK4c) is involved in the subsequent early G(1) arrest necessary for terminal B lymphocyte differentiation.     

Limited overlapping roles of P15(INK4b) and P18(INK4c) cell cycle inhibitors in proliferation and tumorigenesis

Entry of quiescent cells into the cell cycle is driven by the cyclin D-dependent kinases Cdk4 and Cdk6. These kinases are negatively regulated by the INK4 cell cycle inhibitors. We report the generation of mice defective in P15(INK4b) and P18(INK4c). Ablation of these genes, either alone or in combination, does not abrogate cell contact inhibition or senescence of mouse embryo fibroblasts in culture. However, loss of P15(INK4b), but not of P18(INK4c), confers proliferative advantage to these cells and makes them more sensitive to transformation by H-ras oncogenes. In vivo, ablation of P15(INK4b) and P18(INK4c) genes results in lymphoproliferative disorders and tumor formation. Mice lacking P18(INK4c) have deregulated epithelial cell growth leading to the formation of cysts, mostly in the cortical region of the kidneys and the mammary epithelium. Loss of both P15(INK4b) and P18(INK4c) does not result in significantly distinct phenotypic manifestations except for the appearance of cysts in additional tissues. These results indicate that P15(INK4b) and P18(IKN4c) are tumor suppressor proteins that act in different cellular lineages and/or pathways with limited compensatory roles.     

INK4 proteins, a family of mammalian CDK inhibitors with novel biological functions

The cyclin D-Cdk4-6/INK4/Rb/E2F pathway plays a key role in controlling cell growth by integrating multiple mitogenic and antimitogenic stimuli. The members of INK4 family, comprising p16(INK4a), p15(INK4b), p18(INK4c), and p19(INK4d), block the progression of the cell cycle by binding to either Cdk4 or Cdk6 and inhibiting the action of cyclin D. These INK4 proteins share a similar structure dominated by several ankyrin repeats. Although they appear to be structurally redundant and equally potent as inhibitors, the INK4 family members are differentially expressed during mouse development. The striking diversity in the pattern of expression of INK4 genes suggested that this family of cell cycle inhibitors might have cell lineage-specific or tissue-specific functions. The INK4 proteins are commonly lost or inactivated by mutations in diverse types of cancer, and they represent established or candidate tumor suppressors. Apart from their capacity to arrest cells in the G1-phase of the cell cycle they have been shown to participate in an increasing number of cellular processes. Given their emerging roles in fundamental physiological as well as pathological processes, it is interesting to explore the diverse roles for the individual INK4 family members in different functions other than cell cycle regulation. Extensive studies, over the past few years, uncover the involvement of INK4 proteins in senescence, apoptosis, DNA repair, and multistep oncogenesis. We will focus the discussion here on these unexpected issues.