Plants Actively Avoid State Transitions upon Changes in Light Intensity: Role of Light-Harvesting Complex II Protein Dephosphorylation in High Light

Photosystem II (PSII) core and light-harvesting complex II (LHCII) proteins in plant chloroplasts undergo reversible phosphorylation upon changes in light intensity (being under control of redox-regulated STN7 and STN8 kinases and TAP38/PPH1 and PSII core phosphatases). Shift of plants from growth light to high light results in an increase of PSII core phosphorylation, whereas LHCII phosphorylation concomitantly decreases. Exactly the opposite takes place when plants are shifted to lower light intensity. Despite distinct changes occurring in thylakoid protein phosphorylation upon light intensity changes, the excitation balance between PSII and photosystem I remains unchanged. This differs drastically from the canonical-state transition model induced by artificial states 1 and 2 lights that concomitantly either dephosphorylate or phosphorylate, respectively, both the PSII core and LHCII phosphoproteins. Analysis of the kinase and phosphatase mutants revealed that TAP38/PPH1 phosphatase is crucial in preventing state transition upon increase in light intensity. Indeed, tap38/pph1 mutant revealed strong concomitant phosphorylation of both the PSII core and LHCII proteins upon transfer to high light, thus resembling the wild type under state 2 light. Coordinated function of thylakoid protein kinases and phosphatases is shown to secure balanced excitation energy for both photosystems by preventing state transitions upon changes in light intensity. Moreover, PROTON GRADIENT REGULATION5 (PGR5) is required for proper regulation of thylakoid protein kinases and phosphatases, and the pgr5 mutant mimics phenotypes of tap38/pph1. This shows that there is a close cooperation between the redox- and proton gradient-dependent regulatory mechanisms for proper function of the photosynthetic machinery.Photosynthetic light reactions take place in the chloroplast thylakoid membrane. Primary energy conversion reactions are performed by synchronized function of the two light energy-driven enzymes PSII and PSI. PSII uses excitation energy to split water into electrons and protons. PSII feeds electrons to the intersystem electron transfer chain (ETC) consisting of plastoquinone, cytochrome b₆f, and plastocyanin. PSI oxidizes the ETC in a light-driven reduction of NADP to NADPH. Light energy is collected by the light-harvesting antenna systems in the thylakoid membrane composed of specific pigment-protein complexes (light-harvesting complex I [LHCI] and LHCII). The majority of the light-absorbing pigments are bound to LHCII trimers that can serve the light harvesting of both photosystems (Galka et al., 2012; Kouřil et al., 2013; Wientjes et al., 2013b). Energy distribution from LHCII is regulated by protein phosphorylation (Bennett, 1979; Bennett et al., 1980; Allen et al., 1981) under control of the STN7 and STN8 kinases (Depège et al., 2003; Bellafiore et al., 2005; Bonardi et al., 2005; Vainonen et al., 2005) and the TAP38/PPH1 and Photosystem II Core Phosphatase (PBCP) phosphatases (Pribil et al., 2010; Shapiguzov et al., 2010; Samol et al., 2012). LHCII trimers are composed of LHCB1, LHCB2, and LHCB3 proteins, and in addition to reversible phosphorylation of LHCB1 and LHCB2, the protein composition of the LHCII trimers also affects the energy distribution from the light-harvesting system to photosystems (Damkjaer et al., 2009; Pietrzykowska et al., 2014). Most of the LHCII trimers are located in the PSII-rich grana membranes and PSII- and PSI-rich grana margins of the thylakoid membrane, and only a minor fraction resides in PSI- and ATP synthase-rich stroma lamellae (Tikkanen et al., 2008b; Suorsa et al., 2014). Both photosystems bind a small amount of LHCII trimers in biochemically isolatable PSII-LHCII and PSI-LHCII complexes (Pesaresi et al., 2009; Järvi et al., 2011; Caffarri et al., 2014). The large portion of the LHCII, however, does not form isolatable complexes with PSII or PSI, and therefore, it separates as free LHCII trimers upon biochemical fractionation of the thylakoid membrane by Suc gradient centrifugation or in native gel analyses (Caffarri et al., 2009; Järvi et al., 2011), the amount being dependent on the thylakoid isolation method. Nonetheless, in vivo, this major LHCII antenna fraction serves the light-harvesting function. This is based on the fact that fluorescence from free LHCII, peaking at 680 nm in 77-K fluorescence emission spectra, can only be detected when the energy transfer properties of the thylakoid membrane are disturbed by detergents (Grieco et al., 2015).Regulation of excitation energy distribution from LHCII to PSII and PSI has, for decades, been linked to LHCII phosphorylation and state transitions (Bennett, 1979; Bennett et al., 1980; Allen et al., 1981). It has been explained that a fraction of LHCII gets phosphorylated and migrates from PSII to PSI, which can be evidenced as increase in PSI cross section and was assigned as transition to state 2 (for review, see Allen, 2003; Rochaix et al., 2012). The LHCII proteins are, however, phosphorylated all over the thylakoid membrane (i.e. in the PSII- and LHCII-rich grana core) in grana margins containing PSII, LHCII, and PSI as well as in PSI-rich stroma lamellae also harboring PSII-LHCII, LHCII, and PSI-LHCII complexes in minor amounts (Tikkanen et al., 2008b; Grieco et al., 2012; Leoni et al., 2013; Wientjes et al., 2013a)—making the canonical-state transition theory inadequate to explain the physiological role of reversible LHCII phosphorylation (Tikkanen and Aro, 2014). Moreover, the traditional-state transition model is based on lateral segregation of PSII-LHCII and PSI-LHCI to different thylakoid domains. It, however, seems likely that PSII and PSI are energetically connected through a shared light-harvesting system composed of LHCII trimers (Grieco et al., 2015), and there is efficient excitation energy transfer between the two photosystems (Yokono et al., 2015). Nevertheless, it is clear that LHCII phosphorylation is a prerequisite to form an isolatable PSI-LHCII complex called the state transition complex (Pesaresi et al., 2009; Järvi et al., 2011). Existence of a minor state transition complex, however, does not explain why LHCII is phosphorylated all over the thylakoid membrane and how the energy transfer is regulated from the majority of LHCII antenna that is shared between PSII and PSI but does not form isolatable complexes with them (Grieco et al., 2015).Plants grown under any steady-state white light condition show the following characteristics of the thylakoid membrane: PSII core and LHCII phosphoproteins are moderately phosphorylated, phosphorylation takes place all over the thylakoid membrane, and the PSI-LHCII state transition complex is present (Järvi et al., 2011; Grieco et al., 2012; Wientjes et al., 2013b). Upon changes in the light intensity, the relative phosphorylation level between PSII core and LHCII phosphoproteins drastically changes (Rintamäki et al., 1997, 2000) in the timescale of 5 to 30 min. When light intensity increases, the PSII core protein phosphorylation increases, whereas the level of LHCII phosphorylation decreases. On the contrary, a decrease in light intensity decreases the phosphorylation level of PSII core proteins but strongly increases the phosphorylation of the LHCII proteins (Rintamäki et al., 1997, 2000). The presence and absence of the PSI-LHCII state transition complex correlate with LHCII phosphorylation (similar to the state transitions; Pesaresi et al., 2009; Wientjes et al., 2013b). Despite all of these changes in thylakoid protein phosphorylation, the relative excitation of PSII and PSI (i.e. the absorption cross section of PSII and PSI measured by 77-K fluorescence) remains nearly unchanged upon changes in white-light intensity (i.e. no state transitions can be observed despite massive differences in LHCII protein phosphorylation; Tikkanen et al., 2010).The existence of the opposing behaviors of PSII core and LHCII protein phosphorylation, as described above, has been known for more than 15 years (Rintamäki et al., 1997, 2000), but the physiological significance of this phenomenon has remained elusive. It is known that PSII core protein phosphorylation in high light (HL) facilitates the unpacking of PSII-LHCII complexes required for proper processing of the damaged PSII centers and thus, prevents oxidative damage of the photosynthetic machinery (Tikkanen et al., 2008a; Fristedt et al., 2009; Goral et al., 2010; Kirchhoff et al., 2011). It is also known that the damaged PSII core protein D1 needs to be dephosphorylated before its proteolytic degradation upon PSII turnover (Koivuniemi et al., 1995). There is, however, no coherent understanding available to explain why LHCII proteins are dephosphorylated upon exposure of plants to HL and PSII core proteins are dephosphorylated upon exposure to low light (LL).The above-described light quantity-dependent control of thylakoid protein phosphorylation drastically differs from the light quality-dependent protein phosphorylation (Tikkanen et al., 2010). State transitions are generally investigated by using different light qualities, preferentially exciting either PSI or PSII. State 1 light favors PSI excitation, leading to oxidation of the ETC and dephosphorylation of both the PSII core and LHCII proteins. State 2 light, in turn, preferentially excites PSII, leading to reduction of ETC and strong concomitant phosphorylation of both the PSII core and LHCII proteins (Haldrup et al., 2001). Shifts between states 1 and 2 lights induce state transitions, mechanisms that change the excitation between PSII and PSI (Murata and Sugahara, 1969; Murata, 2009). Similar to shifts between state lights, the shifts between LL and HL intensity also change the phosphorylation of the PSII core and LHCII proteins (Rintamäki et al., 1997, 2000). Importantly, the white-light intensity-induced changes in thylakoid protein phosphorylation do not change the excitation energy distribution between the two photosystems (Tikkanen et al., 2010). Despite this fundamental difference between the light quantity- and light quality-induced thylakoid protein phosphorylations, a common feature for both mechanisms is a strict requirement of LHCII phosphorylation for formation of the PSI-LHCII complex. However, it is worth noting that LHCII phosphorylation under state 2 light is not enough to induce the state 2 transition but that the P-LHCII docking proteins in the PSI complex are required (Lunde et al., 2000; Jensen et al., 2004; Zhang and Scheller, 2004; Leoni et al., 2013).Thylakoid protein phosphorylation is a dynamic redox-regulated process dependent on the interplay between two kinases (STN7 and STN8; Depège et al., 2003; Bellafiore et al., 2005; Bonardi et al., 2005; Vainonen et al., 2005) and two phosphatases (TAP38/PPH1 and PBCP; Pribil et al., 2010; Shapiguzov et al., 2010; Samol et al., 2012). Concerning the redox regulation mechanisms in vivo, only the LHCII kinase (STN7) has so far been thoroughly studied (Vener et al., 1997; Rintamäki et al., 2000; Lemeille et al., 2009). The STN7 kinase is considered as the LHCII kinase, and indeed, it phosphorylates the LHCB1 and LHCB2 proteins (Bellafiore et al., 2005; Bonardi et al., 2005; Tikkanen et al., 2006). In addition to this, STN7 takes part in the phosphorylation of PSII core proteins (Vainonen et al., 2005), especially in LL (Tikkanen et al., 2008b, 2010). The STN8 kinase is required for phosphorylation of PSII core proteins in HL but does not significantly participate in phosphorylation of LHCII (Bellafiore et al., 2005; Bonardi et al., 2005; Vainonen et al., 2005; Tikkanen et al., 2010). It has been shown that, in traditional state 1 condition, which oxidizes the ETC, the dephosphorylation of LHCII is dependent on TAP38/PPH1 phosphatase (Pribil et al., 2010; Shapiguzov et al., 2010), whereas the PSII core protein dephosphorylation is dependent on the PBCP phosphatase (Samol et al., 2012). However, it remains unresolved whether and how the TAP38/PPH1 and PBCP phosphatases are involved in the light intensity-dependent regulation of thylakoid protein phosphorylation typical for natural environments.Here, we have used the two kinase (stn7 and stn8) and the two phosphatase (tap38/pph1and pbcp) mutants of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) to elucidate the individual roles of these enzymes in reversible thylakoid protein phosphorylation and distribution of excitation energy between PSII and PSI upon changes in light intensity. It is shown that the TAP38/PPH1-dependent, redox-regulated LHCII dephosphorylation is the key component to maintain excitation balance between PSII and PSI upon increase in light intensity, which at the same time, induces strong phosphorylation of the PSII core proteins. Collectively, reversible but opposite phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of the PSII core and LHCII proteins upon increase or decrease in light intensity are shown to be crucial for maintenance of even distribution of excitation energy to both photosystems, thus preventing state transitions. Moreover, evidence is provided indicating that the pH gradient across the thylakoid membrane is yet another important component in regulation of the distribution of excitation energy to PSII and PSI, possibly by affecting the regulation of thylakoid kinases and phosphatases.     

TEF30 Interacts with Photosystem II Monomers and Is Involved in the Repair of Photodamaged Photosystem II in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

The remarkable capability of photosystem II (PSII) to oxidize water comes along with its vulnerability to oxidative damage. Accordingly, organisms harboring PSII have developed strategies to protect PSII from oxidative damage and to repair damaged PSII. Here, we report on the characterization of the THYLAKOID ENRICHED FRACTION30 (TEF30) protein in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, which is conserved in the green lineage and induced by high light. Fractionation studies revealed that TEF30 is associated with the stromal side of thylakoid membranes. By using blue native/Deriphat-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, sucrose density gradients, and isolated PSII particles, we found TEF30 to quantitatively interact with monomeric PSII complexes. Electron microscopy images revealed significantly reduced thylakoid membrane stacking in TEF30-underexpressing cells when compared with control cells. Biophysical and immunological data point to an impaired PSII repair cycle in TEF30-underexpressing cells and a reduced ability to form PSII supercomplexes after high-light exposure. Taken together, our data suggest potential roles for TEF30 in facilitating the incorporation of a new D1 protein and/or the reintegration of CP43 into repaired PSII monomers, protecting repaired PSII monomers from undergoing repeated repair cycles or facilitating the migration of repaired PSII monomers back to stacked regions for supercomplex reassembly.Oxygenic photosynthesis is essential for almost all life on Earth, as it provides the reduced carbon and the oxygen required for respiration. A key enzyme in oxygenic photosynthesis is PSII, which catalyzes the light-driven oxidation of water. The core of PSII in algae and land plants contains D1 (PsbA), D2 (PsbD), CP43 (PsbC), CP47 (PsbB), the α-subunit (PsbE) and β-subunit (PsbF) of cytochrome b₅₅₉, as well as several intrinsic low-molecular-mass subunits. The core monomer is associated with the extrinsic oxygen-evolving complex (OEC) consisting of OEE1 (PSBO), OEE2 (PSBP), and OEE3 (PSBQ), which stabilize the inorganic Mn₄O₅Ca cluster required for water oxidation (for review, see Pagliano et al., 2013). PSII core monomers assemble into dimers to which, at both sides, light-harvesting proteins (LHCII) bind to form PSII supercomplexes. In land plants, each PSII dimer binds two each of the monomeric minor LHCII proteins CP24, CP26, and CP29 in addition to up to four major LHCII trimers (Caffarri et al., 2009; Kouřil et al., 2011). Biochemical evidence suggests that, in the thylakoid membrane, up to eight LHCII trimers can be present per PSII core dimer, presumably because of the existence of a pool of extra LHCII (Kouřil et al., 2013). In Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, lacking CP24, each PSII dimer binds two each of the CP26 and CP29 monomers as well as up to six major LHCII trimers (Tokutsu et al., 2012). The reaction center proteins D1 and D2 bind all the redox-active cofactors required for PSII electron transport (Umena et al., 2011). Light captured by the internal antenna proteins CP43 and CP47 and the outer antenna induces charge separation in PSII, which in turn enables the OEC to oxidize water and provide electrons to the electron transfer chain. In land plants and green algae, PSII supercomplexes are localized to stacked regions of the thylakoid membranes, while the synthesis of PSII cores is considered to take place in stroma lamellae.A particular feature of PSII is its vulnerability to light, with the D1 protein being a target of light-induced damage and the damage being proportional to the photon flux density (PFD) applied (Tyystjärvi and Aro, 1996). To cope with this damage, an elaborate, highly conserved repair mechanism has evolved termed the PSII repair cycle, during which damaged PSII complexes are partially disassembled and the defective D1 protein is replaced by a de novo synthesized copy (for review, see Nixon et al., 2010; Komenda et al., 2012; Mulo et al., 2012; Nath et al., 2013a; Nickelsen and Rengstl, 2013; Tyystjärvi, 2013; Järvi et al., 2015). Photodamage occurs at all light intensities, but when the rate of damage exceeds the capacity for repair, photoinhibition is manifested as a decrease in the proportion of active PSII reaction centers (Aro et al., 1993). While PSII photodamage occurs in the supercomplexes in the stacked membrane regions, the replacement of damaged D1 takes place in stroma lamellae (Aro et al., 2005). Thus, the PSII repair cycle requires the lateral migration of PSII complexes, which is impaired by the macromolecular crowding in stacked thylakoid membranes (Kirchhoff, 2014). Lateral migration of damaged PSII complexes is facilitated by thylakoid membrane unfolding and PSII supercomplex disassembly. Both processes are enhanced by the phosphorylation of the PSII core subunits D1, D2, CP43, and PsbH, which is mainly mediated by the protein kinase STATE TRANSITION8 (STN8; Tikkanen et al., 2008; Fristedt et al., 2009; Herbstová et al., 2012; Nath et al., 2013b; Wunder et al., 2013). Efficient PSII supercomplex disassembly also requires the THYLAKOID FORMATION1 (THF1)/NON-YELLOW COLORING4 (NYC4)/Psb29 protein (Huang et al., 2013; Yamatani et al., 2013). After the migration of PSII monomers to unstacked thylakoid regions, PSII core subunits are dephosphorylated by the PSII core phosphatase PBCP (Samol et al., 2012), which is required for the efficient degradation of D1 (Koivuniemi et al., 1995; Rintamäki et al., 1996; Kato and Sakamoto, 2014). Degradation of D1 is subsequently realized by the membrane-integral FtsH protease (Lindahl et al., 2000; Silva et al., 2003) and by lumenal and stromal Deg proteases (Haussühl et al., 2001; Kapri-Pardes et al., 2007; Sun et al., 2010). Degradation is assisted by the THYLAKOID LUMEN PROTEIN18.3 (TLP18.3), presumably by its phosphatase activity and ability to interact with lumenal Deg1 (Sirpiö et al., 2007; Wu et al., 2011; Zienkiewicz et al., 2012). D1 proteolysis follows the partial disassembly of the PSII complex, during which CP43 and low-molecular-mass subunits are released to generate a CP43-free PSII monomer (Aro et al., 2005). Thereafter, a newly synthesized D1 copy is cotranslationally inserted from a plastidial 70S ribosome into the thylakoid membrane and processed by the CARBOXYL TERMINAL PEPTIDASE A (CTPA; Zhang et al., 1999, 2000; Che et al., 2013). In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), the D1 synthesis rate appears to be negatively regulated by the PROTEIN DISULFIDE ISOMERASE6 (PDI6; Wittenberg et al., 2014). Moreover, yet unknown steps during PSII repair require the stromal cyclophilin ROTAMASE CYP4 and stromal HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN70 (Schroda et al., 1999; Yokthongwattana et al., 2001; Cai et al., 2008). The PSII repair cycle is completed by the reassembly of the CP43 protein, ligation of the OEC, back migration of PSII to stacked membrane regions, and supercomplex formation. Except for CtpA, all mentioned factors appear to be specific for PSII repair, while many more auxiliary factors play roles in PSII de novo synthesis and repair (for review, see Järvi et al., 2015).In this study, we report on the functional characterization of the THYLAKOID ENRICHED FRACTION30 (TEF30) protein in C. reinhardtii. In this organism, TEF30 was first identified in a proteomics study on isolated thylakoid membranes (Allmer et al., 2006). TEF30 attracted our attention because its abundance increased 1.7-fold in membrane-enriched fractions of C. reinhardtii cells that had been shifted from 41 to 145 µmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ for 8 h (Mettler et al., 2014; Supplemental Fig. S1). The TEF30 ortholog in Arabidopsis M-ENRICHED THYLAKOID PROTEIN1 (MET1; where M stands for mesophyll cells) was functionally characterized only recently (Bhuiyan et al., 2015). Both MET1 and TEF30 interact quantitatively with monomeric PSII core particles at the stroma side of the thylakoid membranes and play a role in the assembly of PSII monomers and/or their migration to stacked membrane regions for supercomplex assembly. While MET1 appears to exert this function during PSII de novo biogenesis and during the PSII repair cycle in Arabidopsis, TEF30 appears to function exclusively during PSII repair in C. reinhardtii.     

In Vivo Identification of Photosystem II Light Harvesting Complexes Interacting with PHOTOSYSTEM II SUBUNIT S

Light is the primary energy source for photosynthetic organisms, but in excess, it can generate reactive oxygen species and lead to cell damage. Plants evolved multiple mechanisms to modulate light use efficiency depending on illumination intensity to thrive in a highly dynamic natural environment. One of the main mechanisms for protection from intense illumination is the dissipation of excess excitation energy as heat, a process called nonphotochemical quenching. In plants, nonphotochemical quenching induction depends on the generation of a pH gradient across thylakoid membranes and on the presence of a protein called PHOTOSYSTEM II SUBUNIT S (PSBS). Here, we generated Physcomitrella patens lines expressing histidine-tagged PSBS that were exploited to purify the native protein by affinity chromatography. The mild conditions used in the purification allowed copurifying PSBS with its interactors, which were identified by mass spectrometry analysis to be mainly photosystem II antenna proteins, such as LIGHT-HARVESTING COMPLEX B (LHCB). PSBS interaction with other proteins appears to be promiscuous and not exclusive, although the major proteins copurified with PSBS were components of the LHCII trimers (LHCB3 and LHCBM). These results provide evidence of a physical interaction between specific photosystem II light-harvesting complexes and PSBS in the thylakoids, suggesting that these subunits are major players in heat dissipation of excess energy.Photosynthetic organisms exploit sunlight energy to support their metabolism. However, if absorbed in excess, light can produce harmful reactive oxygen species (Li et al., 2009; Murchie and Niyogi, 2011). In a natural environment, light intensity is highly variable and can rapidly change from being limited to being in excess. To survive and thrive in such a variable habitat, plants evolved multiple strategies to modulate their light use efficiency to limit reactive oxygen species formation when exposed to excess illumination while maintaining the ability to harvest light efficiently when required (Li et al., 2009; Murchie and Niyogi, 2011; Ruban, 2015). Among these different protection processes, the fastest, called nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ), is activated in a few seconds after a change in illumination, and it leads to the thermal dissipation of excess absorbed energy. NPQ is a complex phenomenon with different components that are distinguished according to their activation/relaxation time scale (Demmig-Adams et al., 1996; Szabó et al., 2005; Niyogi and Truong, 2013). The primary and fastest NPQ component, called qE (for energy-quenching component) or feedback deexcitation, depends on the generation of a pH gradient across the thylakoid membranes (Niyogi and Truong, 2013). In land plants, qE activation requires the presence of a thylakoid protein called PHOTOSYSTEM II SUBUNIT S (PSBS; Li et al., 2000, 2004). The Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) PSBS-depleted mutant psbs KO (Li et al., 2000) is unable to activate qE and also showed reduced fitness when exposed to natural light variations in the field, supporting a major role for this protein in responding to illumination intensity fluctuations (Li et al., 2000; Külheim et al., 2002). Mutational analyses showed that the PSBS role in qE strictly depends on the presence of two protonable Glu residues, which are most likely involved in sensing the pH decrease in the lumen (Li et al., 2004). Despite several studies, however, the precise molecular mechanism by which PSBS controls NPQ induction remains debatable, and contrasting hypotheses have been presented (for review, see Ruban et al., 2012). PSBS has been hypothesized to bind pigments and to be directly responsible for energy dissipation based on its sequence similarity with LIGHT HARVESTING COMPLEX (LHC) proteins (Li et al., 2000; Aspinall-O’Dea et al., 2002). An alternative hypothesis instead suggested that PSBS is unable to bind pigments (Funk et al., 1995; Crouchman et al., 2006; Bonente et al., 2008a) and that it plays an indirect role in NPQ by modulating the PSII antenna protein transition from light harvesting to an energy dissipative state (Betterle et al., 2009; Johnson et al., 2011). This transition has been suggested to depend on the control of the macroorganization of the PSII-LHCII supercomplexes that are present in the grana membranes (Kiss et al., 2008; Betterle et al., 2009; Kereïche et al., 2010; Johnson et al., 2011). Consistent with this hypothesis, it was recently demonstrated that PSBS is able to induce a dissipative state in isolated LHCII proteins in liposomes (Wilk et al., 2013), suggesting that its interactions with antenna proteins play a key role in its biological activity. However, the precise identity of PSBS interactors (Teardo et al., 2007; Betterle et al., 2009), the PSBS oligomerization state (Bergantino et al., 2003), and its localization within PSII supercomplexes (Nield et al., 2000; Haniewicz et al., 2013) remain unclear or at least controversial, limiting the current understanding of PSBS molecular mechanisms.The moss Physcomitrella patens has recently emerged as a valuable model organism in which to study NPQ. As in the model angiosperm Arabidopsis, PSBS accumulation modulates NPQ amplitude and protects plants from photoinhibition under strong light in P. patens (Li et al., 2000; Alboresi et al., 2010; Zia et al., 2011; Gerotto et al., 2012). PSBS-mediated NPQ in P. patens also showed zeaxanthin dependence as in other plants (Niyogi et al., 1998; Pinnola et al., 2013). The moss P. patens has another protein involved in NPQ, LHCSR, which is typically found in algae and is different from proteins found in vascular plants (Peers et al., 2009; Bailleul et al., 2010; Gerotto and Morosinotto, 2013). Even if LHCSR is present in P. patens, LHCSR- and PSBS-dependent NPQ mechanisms were shown to be independent and to have an additive effect without any significant functional synergy (Gerotto et al., 2012).Previous data also demonstrated the possibility of achieving strong overexpression of PSBS in P. patens (Gerotto et al., 2012), which, however, was never observed in Arabidopsis (Li et al., 2002). This property was exploited in this work to overexpress a His-tagged PSBS isoform, which was afterward purified in its native state from dark-adapted thylakoid membranes. Several PSII antenna proteins were copurified with PSBS and identified by mass spectrometry analyses, demonstrating that they interact physically in dark-adapted thylakoid membranes. Components of LHCII trimers (LHCB3 and LHCBM) appear to be major, but not exclusive, components of PSBS interactors.     

Metal Binding in Photosystem II Super- and Subcomplexes from Barley Thylakoids

Metals exert important functions in the chloroplast of plants, where they act as cofactors and catalysts in the photosynthetic electron transport chain. In particular, manganese (Mn) has a key function because of its indispensable role in the water-splitting reaction of photosystem II (PSII). More and better knowledge is required on how the various complexes of PSII are affected in response to, for example, nutritional disorders and other environmental stress conditions. We here present, to our knowledge, a new method that allows the analysis of metal binding in intact photosynthetic complexes of barley (Hordeum vulgare) thylakoids. The method is based on size exclusion chromatography coupled to inductively coupled plasma triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry. Proper fractionation of PSII super- and subcomplexes was achieved by critical selection of elution buffers, detergents for protein solubilization, and stabilizers to maintain complex integrity. The applicability of the method was shown by quantification of Mn binding in PSII from thylakoids of two barley genotypes with contrasting Mn efficiency exposed to increasing levels of Mn deficiency. The amount of PSII supercomplexes was drastically reduced in response to Mn deficiency. The Mn efficient genotype bound significantly more Mn per unit of PSII under control and mild Mn deficiency conditions than the inefficient genotype, despite having lower or similar total leaf Mn concentrations. It is concluded that the new method facilitates studies of the internal use of Mn and other biometals in various PSII complexes as well as their relative dynamics according to changes in environmental conditions.Several metals are important for chloroplast functioning, particularly in the photosynthetic apparatus, where they act as cofactors and catalysts in electron transport processes (Merchant, 2006; Nouet et al., 2011; Yruela, 2013). The photosynthetic biometals include iron (Fe) in the form of Fe-S clusters in PSI, heme-bridged Fe (cytochrome b₅₅₉) and nonheme Fe in PSII, copper (Cu) in plastocyanin, magnesium (Mg) in chlorophyll (Chl), and calcium (Ca) and manganese (Mn) in PSII. Mn has a very special role because a metal cluster of four Mn ions and one Ca ion comprises the catalytic center of the oxygen evolving complex (OEC) in PSII (Ono et al., 1992; Umena et al., 2011). In the OEC, water is split, and molecular oxygen is produced by the photosynthetic light reactions. The photosynthetic biometals are, however, highly reactive and involved in a multitude of side reactions, which constitute a challenge for metal homeostasis. Accordingly, the handling of metals must be tightly regulated, and they must be kept within specific concentration ranges inside living cells to ensure adequate supply, while at the same time, avoiding oxidative stress (Pakrasi et al., 2001; Shcolnick and Keren, 2006; Møller et al., 2007).PSII is a large pigment-protein complex localized in the grana regions of the thylakoid membrane of chloroplasts. The basic structure of PSII is a monomer, and each complex contains more than 40 different proteins bound either stably or transiently (Nelson and Yocum, 2006; Shi et al., 2012; Järvi et al., 2015). The luminal surfaces of PSII are associated with the extrinsic proteins PsbO, PsbP, and PsbQ, which shield and support the catalytic Mn cluster and are required for efficient oxygen evolution (Roose et al., 2007; Bricker et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2014). After dimerization of the monomer, the complex associates with multiple copies of the light-harvesting antenna complex II (LHCII), forming various types of functional PSII-LHCII supercomplexes (Tikkanen et al., 2008; Kouřil et al., 2012; Shi et al., 2012).Intact PSII-LHCII supercomplexes have been successfully isolated, characterized, and refined from, for example, pea (Pisum sativum; Barera et al., 2012), Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Caffarri et al., 2009), and green algae (Chlamydomonas reinhardtii; Tokutsu et al., 2012). The procedure has typically involved Suc density gradient ultracentrifugation. Also, blue native (BN)-PAGE has been optimized for the separation and proteomic characterization of thylakoid PSII-LHCII supercomplexes (Heinemeyer et al., 2004; Järvi et al., 2011; Pagliano et al., 2014). The supramolecular organization of isolated PSII is very much dependent on the choice of detergent for efficient solubilization of the membrane-bound photosynthetic pigment-protein complexes. In recent years, dodecyl maltoside (DM) has become a commonly used detergent for one-step isolation of integral membrane proteins and complexes from thylakoids (Eshaghi et al., 1999; van Roon et al., 2000; Dekker et al., 2002; Pagliano et al., 2011). This detergent exists in two isomeric forms (α-DM and β-DM), of which α-DM is a milder detergent than β-DM, thereby better preserving the integrity of large PSII-LHCII supercomplexes (Pagliano et al., 2012).The major challenge associated with purification of higher plant PSII-LHCII supercomplexes is to obtain and subsequently, maintain the integrity of PSII super- and subcomplexes, including cofactors and the extrinsic proteins. To prevent dissociation of biometals and the extrinsic proteins from PSII, the osmoprotectant betaine (Papageorgiou et al., 1991; Papageorgiou and Murata, 1995) has successfully been included in the buffer of Suc gradients (Boekema et al., 1998; Tokutsu et al., 2012). Although the above-mentioned methods primarily have focused on the characterization and structural organization of isolated PSII-LHCII supercomplexes, no bench-top method has been available that allows direct analysis of the actual metal binding in PSII super- and subcomplexes. Such a method is required in order to fully understand how Mn and other photosynthetic biometals interact with the photosynthetic complexes, in particular PSII, and how the metal binding affects PSII dynamics under changing environmental conditions, including plant nutritional disorders.We here present a robust and highly sensitive method for analysis of metal binding in PSII-LHCII super- and subcomplexes from isolated barley (Hordeum vulgare) thylakoids. The method is based on size exclusion chromatography (SEC) coupled to inductively coupled plasma (ICP) triple-quadrupole (QQQ) mass spectrometry (MS). SEC is a gentle protein separation technique, provided that the stationary and mobile phases are carefully selected. Using an optimized set of analytical conditions, it is possible to maintain the integrity of metalloprotein complexes (Persson et al., 2009; Husted et al., 2011). We systematically evaluate the essential and important factors required to obtain optimal chromatographic resolution while maintaining PSII integrity, focusing on choice of mobile phase, detergents, stabilizers, and the most suitable chromatographic columns for efficient protein fractionation and elution. The optimized method, with its multielement ability, enables the study of metal binding in PSII-LHCII super- and subcomplexes. To show the applicability of the method, we studied the metal profiles of barley thylakoids that had been isolated from plants with different levels of Mn deficiency. Mn binding in size-fractionated PSII complexes was evaluated in response to increasing Mn deficiency, and two genotypes differing in their tolerance to Mn deficiency were compared.     

Steady-State Phosphorylation of Light-Harvesting Complex II Proteins Preserves Photosystem I under Fluctuating White Light

According to the “state transitions” theory, the light-harvesting complex II (LHCII) phosphorylation in plant chloroplasts is essential to adjust the relative absorption cross section of photosystem II (PSII) and PSI upon changes in light quality. The role of LHCII phosphorylation upon changes in light intensity is less thoroughly investigated, particularly when changes in light intensity are too fast to allow the phosphorylation/dephosphorylation processes to occur. Here, we demonstrate that the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) stn7 (for state transition7) mutant, devoid of the STN7 kinase and LHCII phosphorylation, shows a growth penalty only under fluctuating white light due to a low amount of PSI. Under constant growth light conditions, stn7 acquires chloroplast redox homeostasis by increasing the relative amount of PSI centers. Thus, in plant chloroplasts, the steady-state LHCII phosphorylation plays a major role in preserving PSI upon rapid fluctuations in white light intensity. Such protection of PSI results from LHCII phosphorylation-dependent equal distribution of excitation energy to both PSII and PSI from the shared LHCII antenna and occurs in cooperation with nonphotochemical quenching and the proton gradient regulation5-dependent control of electron flow, which are likewise strictly regulated by white light intensity. LHCII phosphorylation is concluded to function both as a stabilizer (in time scales of seconds to minutes) and a dynamic regulator (in time scales from tens of minutes to hours and days) of redox homeostasis in chloroplasts, subject to modifications by both environmental and metabolic cues. Exceeding the capacity of LHCII phosphorylation/dephosphorylation to balance the distribution of excitation energy between PSII and PSI results in readjustment of photosystem stoichiometry.Plant acclimation to different quantities and qualities of light has been extensively investigated. The light quality experiments have usually concerned the red/blue and far-red light acclimation strategies, which have been closely related to the state transitions and the phosphorylation of the light-harvesting complex II (LHCII) proteins, Lhcb1 and Lhcb2, by the state transition7 (STN7) kinase (Allen, 2003; Bellafiore et al., 2005; Bonardi et al., 2005; Tikkanen et al., 2006; Rochaix, 2007). Such studies on acclimation to different qualities of light have uncovered key mechanisms required for the maintenance of photosynthetic efficiency in dense populations and canopies (Dietzel et al., 2008). However, the role of LHCII phosphorylation under fluctuations in the quantity of white light has been scarcely investigated. Light conditions in natural environments may be very complex with respect to the quantity of white light, which constantly fluctuates both in short- and long-term durations (Smith, 1982; Külheim et al., 2002). Thus, the acclimation strategies to natural environments must concomitantly meet the challenges of both high- and low-light acclimation. Changing cloudiness, for example, would initiate both the high-light and low-light acclimation signals in the time scale of minutes and hours, whereas the movements of leaves in the wind or the rapid movement of clouds would initiate even more frequent light acclimation signals. The kinetics of reversible LHCII phosphorylation is far too slow to cope with rapid environmental changes.The phosphorylation level of LHCII proteins in the thylakoid membrane is regulated by both the STN7 kinase and the counteracting PPH1/TAP38 phosphatase (Pribil et al., 2010; Shapiguzov et al., 2010). No definite results are available about regulation of the PPH1/TAP38 phosphatase, but the STN7 kinase is strongly under redox regulation (Lemeille et al., 2009) and controls the phosphorylation level of LHCII proteins under varying white light intensities as well as according to chloroplast metabolic cues, as described already decades ago (Fernyhough et al., 1983; Rintamäki et al., 2000; Hou et al., 2003). So far, research on the role of the STN7 kinase and LHCII phosphorylation in the light acclimation of higher plants has heavily focused on reversible LHCII phosphorylation and concomitant state transitions. The state 1-to-state 2 transition, by definition, means the phosphorylation of LHCII proteins, their detachment from PSII in grana membranes, and migration to the stroma membranes to serve in the collection of excitation energy to PSI (Fork and Satoh, 1986; Williams and Allen, 1987; Wollman, 2001; Rochaix, 2007; Kargul and Barber, 2008; Murata, 2009; Lemeille et al., 2010; Minagawa, 2011). Concomitantly, the absorption cross section of PSII decreases and that of PSI increases (Canaani and Malkin, 1984; Malkin et al., 1986; Ruban and Johnson, 2009). Indeed, state transitions have been well documented when different qualities (blue/red and far red) of light, preferentially exciting either PSII or PSI, have been applied.Different from state transitions, the white light intensity-dependent reversible LHCII phosphorylation does not result in differential excitation of the two photosystems (Tikkanen et al., 2010). Instead, both photosystems remain nearly equally excited independently whether the LHCII proteins are heavily phosphorylated or strongly dephosphorylated. Moreover, it is worth noting that the different qualities of light generally used to induce reversible LHCII phosphorylation and state transitions (blue/red and far-red lights) have usually been of very low intensity (for review, see Haldrup et al., 2001), and apparently, minimal protonation of the lumen takes place under such illumination conditions. Yet another difference between induction of LHCII protein phosphorylation by different qualities of light or different quantities of white light concerns the concomitant induction of PSII core protein phosphorylation. In the former case, the level of PSII core protein phosphorylation follows the phosphorylation pattern of LHCII proteins, whereas under different quantities of white light, the phosphorylation behavior of PSII core and LHCII proteins is the opposite (Tikkanen et al., 2008b).To gain a more comprehensive understanding of the physiological role of white light-induced changes in LHCII protein phosphorylation, we have integrated Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) LHCII phosphorylation with other light-dependent regulatory modifications of light harvesting and electron transfer in the thylakoid membrane, which include the nonphotochemical quenching of excitation energy (for review, see Niyogi, 1999; Horton and Ruban, 2005; Barros and Kühlbrandt, 2009; de Bianchi et al., 2010; Jahns and Holzwarth, 2012; Ruban et al., 2012) and the photosynthetic control of electron transfer by the cytochrome b₆f (Cytb6f) complex (Rumberg and Siggel, 1969; Witt, 1979; Tikhonov et al., 1981; Bendall, 1982; Nishio and Whitmarsh, 1993; Joliot and Johnson, 2011; Suorsa et al., 2012; for review, see Foyer et al., 1990, 2012), both strongly dependent on lumenal protonation.It is demonstrated that the steady-state LHCII phosphorylation is particularly important under rapidly fluctuating light (FL) conditions. This ensures equal energy distribution to both photosystems, prevents the accumulation of electrons in the intersystem electron transfer chain (ETC), eliminates perturbations in chloroplast redox balance, and maintains PSI functionality upon rapid fluctuations in white light intensity.     

The Stromal Chloroplast Deg7 Protease Participates in the Repair of Photosystem II after Photoinhibition in Arabidopsis

Light is the ultimate source of energy for photosynthesis; however, excessive light leads to photooxidative damage and hence reduced photosynthetic efficiency, especially when combined with other abiotic stresses. Although the photosystem II (PSII) reaction center D1 protein is the primary target of photooxidative damage, other PSII core proteins are also damaged and degraded. However, it is still largely unknown whether degradation of D1 and other PSII proteins involves previously uncharacterized proteases. Here, we show that Deg7 is peripherally associated with the stromal side of the thylakoid membranes and that Deg7 interacts directly with PSII. Our results show that Deg7 is involved in the primary cleavage of photodamaged D1, D2, CP47, and CP43 and that this activity is essential for its function in PSII repair. The double mutants deg5 deg7 and deg8 deg7 showed no obvious phenotypic differences under normal growth conditions, but additive effects were observed under high light. These results suggest that Deg proteases on both the stromal and luminal sides of the thylakoid membranes are important for the efficient PSII repair in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana).Chloroplasts of higher plants carry out one of the most important biochemical reactions: the capture of light energy and its conversion into chemical energy. Although light is the ultimate source of energy for photosynthesis, it can also be harmful to plants. Light-induced loss of photosynthetic efficiency, which is generally termed as photoinhibition, limits plant growth and lowers productivity, especially when combined with other abiotic stresses.The main target of photoinhibition is PSII, which catalyzes the light-dependent water oxidation concomitantly with oxygen production (for review, see Prasil et al., 1992; Aro et al., 1993; Adir et al., 2003). In higher plants, PSII consists of more than 20 subunits, including the reaction center D1 and D2 proteins, cytochrome (Cyt) b₅₅₉, the light-harvesting chlorophyll a-binding proteins CP47 and CP43, the oxygen-evolving 33-kD protein (PsbO), and several low molecular mass proteins (Nelson and Yocum, 2006). The PSII reaction center D1 protein has been identified among PSII proteins as the primary target of light-induced damage (Kyle et al., 1984; Mattoo et al., 1984; Ohad et al., 1984; Adir et al., 1990), but several studies have shown that the D2, CP47, and CP43 proteins are degraded under photoinhibitory conditions (Schuster et al., 1988; Yamamoto and Akasaka, 1995; Jansen et al., 1999; Adir et al., 2003). Moreover, several small PSII subunits, such as PsbH, PsbW, and Cyt b₅₅₉, were also found to be frequently replaced within PSII (Hagman et al., 1997; Ortega et al., 1999; Bergantino et al., 2003). Evidence for the involvement of two families of proteases, FtsH and Deg, in the degradation of the D1 protein in thylakoids of higher plants has been recently described (Lindahl et al., 1996, 2000; Bailey et al., 2002; Sakamoto et al., 2003; Silva et al., 2003; Kapri-Pardes et al., 2007; Sun et al., 2007a, 2007b). However, it is still largely unknown whether degradation of D1 and other PSII proteins involves previously uncharacterized proteases.DegP (or HtrA) proteases were initially identified based on the fact that they are required for the survival of Escherichia coli at high temperatures and for the degradation of abnormal periplasmic proteins (Lipinska et al., 1988; Strauch and Beckwith, 1988). DegP is an ATP-independent Ser endopeptidase, and it contains a trypsin-like protease domain at the N terminus, followed by two PDZ domains (Gottesman, 1996; Pallen and Wren, 1997; Clausen et al., 2002). PDZ domains appear to be important for complex assembly and substrate binding through three or four residues in the C terminus of their target proteins (Doyle et al., 1996; Harris and Lim, 2001). DegP switches between chaperone and protease functions in a temperature-dependent manner. The chaperone function dominates at low temperatures, and DegP becomes proteolytically active at elevated temperatures (Spiess et al., 1999). Crystal structures of different members of the DegP protein family (Krojer et al., 2002; Li et al., 2002; Kim et al., 2003; Wilken et al., 2004) have revealed the structure-function relationship of these PDZ-containing proteases. Trimeric DegP is the functional unit, and the hexameric DegP is formed via the staggered association of trimers (Clausen et al., 2002; Kim and Kim, 2005). At normal growth temperatures, the active site of the protease is located within the chamber of hexameric DegP, which is not accessible to the substrates. However, at high temperatures, conformational changes induce the activation of the protease function (Krojer et al., 2002). Recent studies have shed light on the substrate binding-induced formation of larger oligomeric complexes of DegP (Jiang et al., 2008; Krojer et al., 2008).In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), 16 genes coding for DegP-like proteases have been identified, and at least seven gene products are predicted to be located in chloroplasts (Kieselbach and Funk, 2003; Huesgen et al., 2005; Adam et al., 2006; Sakamoto, 2006; Kato and Sakamoto, 2009). Based on proteomic data, four Deg proteases have been shown to be localized to the chloroplast (Peltier et al., 2002; Schubert et al., 2002) and functionally characterized. Deg1, Deg5, and Deg8 are located in thylakoid lumen, and Deg2 is peripherally associated with the stromal side of thylakoid membranes (Itzhaki et al., 1998; Haußühl et al., 2001; Sun et al., 2007a). Recombinant DegP1, now renamed Deg1, has been shown to be proteolytically active toward thylakoid lumen proteins such as plastocyanin and PsbO of PSII in vitro (Chassin et al., 2002). A 5.2-kD C-terminal fragment of the D1 protein was detected in vitro after incubation of recombinant Deg1 with inside-out thylakoid membranes. In transgenic plants with reduced levels of Deg1, fewer of its 16- and 5.2-kD degradation products were observed (Kapri-Pardes et al., 2007). Deg5 and Deg8 form a dodecameric complex in the thylakoid lumen, and recombinant Deg8 is able to degrade the photodamaged D1 protein of PSII in an in vitro assay (Sun et al., 2007a). The 16-kD N-terminal degradation fragment of the D1 protein was detected in wild-type plants but not in a deg5 deg8 double mutant after high-light treatment. The deg5 deg8 double mutant showed increased sensitivity to high light and high temperature in terms of growth and PSII activity compared with the single mutants deg5 and deg8, suggesting that Deg5 and Deg8 have overlapping functions in the primary cleavage of the CD loop of the D1 protein (Sun et al., 2007a, 2007b). In vitro analysis has demonstrated that recombinant stroma-localized Deg2 was also shown to be involved in the primary cleavage of the DE loop of the D1 protein (Haußühl et al., 2001). However, analysis of a mutant lacking Deg2 suggested that Deg2 may not be involved in D1 degradation in vivo (Huesgen et al., 2006).Here, we have expressed and purified a recombinant DegP protease, His-Deg7. In vitro experiments showed that His-Deg7 is proteolytically active toward the PSII proteins D1, D2, CP43, and CP47. In vivo analyses of a deg7 mutant revealed that the mutant is more sensitive to high light stress than the wild-type plants. We demonstrated that Deg7 is a chloroplast stroma protein associated with the thylakoid membranes and that it interacts with PSII, which suggests that it can cleave the stroma-exposed region of substrate proteins. Our results also provide evidence that Deg7 is important for maintaining PSII function.     

The Solar Action Spectrum of Photosystem II Damage

The production of oxygen and the supply of energy for life on earth rely on the process of photosynthesis using sunlight. Paradoxically, sunlight damages the photosynthetic machinery, primarily photosystem II (PSII), leading to photoinhibition and loss of plant performance. However, there is uncertainty about which wavelengths are most damaging to PSII under sunlight. In this work we examined this in a simple experiment where Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) leaves were exposed to different wavelengths of sunlight by dispersing the solar radiation across the surface of the leaf via a prism. To isolate only the process of photodamage, the repair of photodamaged PSII was inhibited by infiltration of chloramphenicol into the exposed leaves. The extent of photodamage was then measured as the decrease in the maximum quantum yield of PSII using an imaging pulse amplitude modulation fluorometer. Under the experimental light conditions, photodamage to PSII occurred most strongly in regions exposed to ultraviolet (UV) or yellow light. The extent of UV photodamage under incident sunlight would be greater than we observed when one corrects for the optical efficiency of our system. Our results suggest that photodamage to PSII under sunlight is primarily associated with UV rather than photosynthetically active light wavelengths.Plants absorb sunlight to power the productive photochemical reactions of photosynthesis. Absorption of sunlight may also lead to deleterious photochemistry that damages the photosynthetic machinery. The PSII protein complex is important in this regard as it seems to be most susceptible to photodamage that results in photoinhibition and ultimately suppresses photosynthetic CO₂ assimilation, growth, and productivity (Long et al., 1994; Takahashi and Murata, 2008). Although plants have photoprotection mechanisms (Niyogi, 1999) and can effectively repair photodamaged PSII through the PSII repair cycle (Aro et al., 1993), photoinhibition still occurs under stressful environmental conditions (Nishiyama et al., 2006; Murata et al., 2007; Takahashi and Murata, 2008).The onset of photoinhibition is strongly correlated with the absorption of excessive excitation energy for photosynthesis. Therefore, photodamage to PSII was most readily assumed to be attributed to the excess light absorbed by photosynthetic pigments (Melis, 1999). However, the extent of photodamage that is measured under conditions where the repair of photodamaged PSII is prevented by inhibiting chloroplast protein synthesis (i.e. lincomycin or chloramphenicol) is directly proportional to the intensity of light (Mattoo et al., 1984; Tyystjärvi and Aro, 1996; Nishiyama et al., 2001, 2004; Allakhverdiev and Murata, 2004; Chow et al., 2005). Furthermore, recent studies have demonstrated that interruption of the Calvin cycle (Hakala et al., 2005; Takahashi and Murata, 2005; Takahashi et al., 2007) and inhibition of electron transfer between Q_A and Q_B (Jegerschöld et al., 1990; Kirilovsky et al., 1994; Allakhverdiev et al., 2005) have no effect on the rate of photodamage to PSII, but in fact cause inhibition of the repair of photodamaged PSII due to suppression of the de novo synthesis of PSII proteins (Allakhverdiev et al., 2005; Takahashi and Murata, 2005, 2006). Thus, photodamage to PSII is paradoxically not associated with the excess light absorbed by photosynthetic pigments (Nishiyama et al., 2006; Murata et al., 2007; Takahashi and Murata, 2008).Studies of the effect of monochromatic light on the photodamage process have suggested that photodamage to PSII primarily occurs at the manganese cluster of the oxygen-evolving complex (OEC) through a direct photoexcitation of manganese (Hakala et al., 2005; Ohnishi et al., 2005). Release of manganese ions (Mn²⁺) from thylakoid membranes is accompanied by photodamage to PSII (Hakala et al., 2005; Zsiros et al., 2006), suggesting that disruption of the manganese cluster upon absorption of light might be a primary event in photodamage. It is likely that the reaction center of PSII is secondarily damaged by light absorbed by photosynthetic pigments after inactivation of the OEC (Hakala et al., 2005; Ohnishi et al., 2005), if an alternative electron transfer donor from lumenal ascorbate is not available (Mano et al., 2004; Tóth et al., 2009). These findings have lead to a recent photodamage model called the manganese (or two-step; Ohnishi et al., 2005) mechanism of photoinhibition (Tyystjärvi, 2008).Studies of the action spectrum of photodamage to PSII have shown that UV damages PSII more effectively than visible light (Jones and Kok, 1966; Jung and Kim, 1990; Hakala et al., 2005; Ohnishi et al., 2005). Thus, under identical light intensity, UV is the most damaging wavelength to PSII. However, inferring damage under natural sunlight is not straight forward as there is a need to account for the spectral distribution and intensity of sunlight. It is unclear which wavelengths of sunlight are most damaging to PSII and we cannot discount the premise that significant primary photodamage to PSII is caused by light absorbed by photosynthetic pigments (Vass and Cser, 2009). To identify which wavelengths of sunlight are most damaging to PSII, sunlight was spectrally dispersed via a prism onto an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) leaf infiltrated with chloramphenicol and decrease in the maximum quantum yield of PSII (F_v/F_m) was measured using an imaging pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) fluorometer. This simple but powerful approach revealed the in vivo spectral dependence of photodamage that had two peaks at UV and yellow wavelengths. Since the spectral efficiency of our optical system decreased below 400 nm, we calculated photodamage to PSII under incident sunlight. Our results show that photodamage to PSII was primarily associated with UV wavelengths and secondarily with yellow light wavelengths. This finding indicates that photodamage to PSII is less associated with light absorbed by photosynthetic pigments under sunlight and suggest that most of photodamage to PSII is potentially avoidable during photosynthesis.     

PHOTOSYSTEM II SUBUNIT R Is Required for Efficient Binding of LIGHT-HARVESTING COMPLEX STRESS-RELATED PROTEIN3 to Photosystem II-Light-Harvesting Supercomplexes in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

In Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, the LIGHT-HARVESTING COMPLEX STRESS-RELATED PROTEIN3 (LHCSR3) protein is crucial for efficient energy-dependent thermal dissipation of excess absorbed light energy and functionally associates with photosystem II-light-harvesting complex II (PSII-LHCII) supercomplexes. Currently, it is unknown how LHCSR3 binds to the PSII-LHCII supercomplex. In this study, we investigated the role of PHOTOSYSTEM II SUBUNIT R (PSBR) an intrinsic membrane-spanning PSII subunit, in the binding of LHCSR3 to PSII-LHCII supercomplexes. Down-regulation of PSBR expression diminished the efficiency of oxygen evolution and the extent of nonphotochemical quenching and had an impact on the stability of the oxygen-evolving complex as well as on PSII-LHCII-LHCSR3 supercomplex formation. Its down-regulation destabilized the PSII-LHCII supercomplex and strongly reduced the binding of LHCSR3 to PSII-LHCII supercomplexes, as revealed by quantitative proteomics. PHOTOSYSTEM II SUBUNIT P deletion, on the contrary, destabilized PHOTOSYSTEM II SUBUNIT Q binding but did not affect PSBR and LHCSR3 association with PSII-LHCII. In summary, these data provide clear evidence that PSBR is required for the stable binding of LHCSR3 to PSII-LHCII supercomplexes and is essential for efficient energy-dependent quenching and the integrity of the PSII-LHCII-LHCSR3 supercomplex under continuous high light.Plant photosynthetic electron transfer is conducted by a series of reactions at the chloroplast thylakoid membrane, resulting in light-dependent water oxidation, NADP reduction, and ATP formation (Whatley et al., 1963). Two separate photosystems (PSI and PSII) and an ATP synthase catalyze these reactions. PSI and PSII are multiprotein complexes that are mainly embedded in unstacked and stacked regions of the thylakoid membrane, respectively. PSI consists of more than 10 subunits and a number of cofactors such as chlorophyll a, β-carotene, phylloquinone, and three iron-sulfur (4Fe-4S) clusters (Busch and Hippler, 2011). PSI catalyzes light-driven electron transfer from luminal plastocyanin to stromal ferredoxin. The latter reduces the ferredoxin-NADP reductase that, in turn, leads to the formation of NADPH. PSII catalyzes light-induced electron transfer from water to the plastoquinone pool by using chlorophyll a, carotenoids, as well as redox-active cofactors, causing the release of oxygen and protons (Pagliano et al., 2013). The core complex is organized as a dimer. Monomers are composed of the reaction center subunits PSBA (D1) and PSBD (D2), the inner antenna proteins PSBB (CP47) and PSBC (CP43), the α- and β-subunits (PSBE and PSBF) of cytochrome b₅₅₉, as well as a number of intrinsic low-molecular-mass subunits. The core monomer is further associated with an inorganic Mn₄O₅Ca cluster and a few chloride ions (Rivalta et al., 2011; Umena et al., 2011) required for photosynthetic water oxidation. To optimize this process, the oxygen-evolving complex is formed at the luminal side by the extrinsic polypeptides PSBO, PSBP, PSBQ, and PSBR (for review, see Pagliano et al., 2013).To enhance the light-harvesting capacity of PSII, various light-harvesting proteins bind to dimeric PSII core complexes (Dekker and Boekema, 2005). A common structure found for vascular plants and green algae is the C₂S₂ supercomplex, where two copies of monomeric Lhcb4 and Lhcb5 and two LHCII trimers (S-trimer; Boekema et al., 1995) bind to the dimeric PSII core. In vascular plants, larger but less stable PSII supercomplexes, known as C₂S₂M₂, are composed of two extra copies of the monomeric Lhcb6 with two additional LHCII trimers (M-trimer) bound through Lhcb4 and Lhcb5 (Dekker and Boekema, 2005; Caffarri et al., 2009). Even larger complexes containing two additional LHCII trimers (L-trimer), bound via Lhcb6, are found and are known as C₂S₂M₂L_1–2 (Boekema et al., 1999). A recent study in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii identified PSII-LHCII supercomplexes with three LHCII trimers attached to each side of the core (C₂S₂M₂L₂; Tokutsu et al., 2012). Interestingly, such PSII-LHCII supercomplexes associate with LIGHT-HARVESTING COMPLEX STRESS-RELATED PROTEIN3 (LHCSR3; Tokutsu and Minagawa, 2013), an ancient light-harvesting protein required for efficient energy-dependent (qE) quenching in the alga (Peers et al., 2009). The qE component of nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ) is an energy-dependent constituent of NPQ and regulates the thermal dissipation of excess absorbed light energy (Li et al., 2000; Peers et al., 2009). The qE capacity in C. reinhardtii increases proportionally to the light-dependent accumulation of the LHCSR3 protein (Peers et al., 2009). In contrast, in vascular plants, qE is constitutively active and dependent on PSBS, a PSII polypeptide (Li et al., 2000). Mass spectrometric analyses of isolated C₂S₂M₂ PSII supercomplexes revealed the presence of extrinsic subunits PSBP, PSBQ, and PSBR, while PSBS was not identified, suggesting that PSBS does not influence the association of the PSII core with the outer light-harvesting complex system (Pagliano et al., 2014). In line with the proteomic findings, recent data suggest that subunits PSBP, PSBQ, and PSBR contribute to the stability of PSII-LHCII supercomplexes in vascular plants (Caffarri et al., 2009; Ifuku et al., 2011; Allahverdiyeva et al., 2013). A recent quantitative proteomic study performed with C. reinhardtii identified PSBR as the only PSII subunit to be induced upon the shift from photoheterotrophic to photoautotrophic growth conditions similar to LHCSR3 (Höhner et al., 2013).In vascular plants and green algae, PSBR is nucleus encoded and has a mass of about 10 kD. The mature protein has a predicted 70-amino acid luminal N-terminal part and a C-terminal transmembrane span (Ljungberg et al., 1986; Lautner et al., 1988; Webber et al., 1989). An association of PSBR with the oxygen-evolving complex has been suggested, as its presence is required for the stable assembly of PSBP with the PSII core and its absence also impacts the binding of PSBQ to the core (Suorsa et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2009). For stable association with the PSII core complex, PSBR needs the presence of PSBJ (Suorsa et al., 2006). Functionally, the depletion of PSBR protein expression decreased rates of oxygen evolution (Allahverdiyeva et al., 2007, 2013) and quinone reoxidation (Allahverdiyeva et al., 2007). PSBR phosphorylation is known for Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Reiland et al., 2009, 2011; Nakagami et al., 2010) and in the green alga C. reinhardtii (Turkina et al., 2006), although phosphorylation sites are not conserved between the alga and the vascular plant.In this work, we addressed the question of whether down-regulation of PSBR expression would affect LHCSR3 binding to the PSII-LHCII supercomplex in C. reinhardtii. To this end, we took advantage of artificial microRNA (amiRNA) technology to down-regulate PSBR expression and investigated the impact of PSBR down-regulation on photosynthetic performance as well as on PSII-LHCII-LHCSR3 supercomplex formation. Our data provide evidence that PSBR is required for the stable binding of LHCSR3 to PSII-LHCII supercomplexes.     

Spore Density Determines Infection Strategy by the Plant Pathogenic Fungus Plectosphaerella cucumerina

Necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens are resisted by different plant defenses. While necrotrophic pathogens are sensitive to jasmonic acid (JA)-dependent resistance, biotrophic pathogens are resisted by salicylic acid (SA)- and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent resistance. Although many pathogens switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy during infection, little is known about the signals triggering this transition. This study is based on the observation that the early colonization pattern and symptom development by the ascomycete pathogen Plectosphaerella cucumerina (P. cucumerina) vary between inoculation methods. Using the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) defense response as a proxy for infection strategy, we examined whether P. cucumerina alternates between hemibiotrophic and necrotrophic lifestyles, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf surface. Untargeted metabolome analysis revealed profound differences in metabolic defense signatures upon different inoculation methods. Quantification of JA and SA, marker gene expression, and cell death confirmed that infection from high spore densities activates JA-dependent defenses with excessive cell death, while infection from low spore densities induces SA-dependent defenses with lower levels of cell death. Phenotyping of Arabidopsis mutants in JA, SA, and ROS signaling confirmed that P. cucumerina is differentially resisted by JA- and SA/ROS-dependent defenses, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf. Furthermore, in situ staining for early callose deposition at the infection sites revealed that necrotrophy by P. cucumerina is associated with elevated host defense. We conclude that P. cucumerina adapts to early-acting plant defenses by switching from a hemibiotrophic to a necrotrophic infection program, thereby gaining an advantage of immunity-related cell death in the host.Plant pathogens are often classified as necrotrophic or biotrophic, depending on their infection strategy (Glazebrook, 2005; Nishimura and Dangl, 2010). Necrotrophic pathogens kill living host cells and use the decayed plant tissue as a substrate to colonize the plant, whereas biotrophic pathogens parasitize living plant cells by employing effector molecules that suppress the host immune system (Pel and Pieterse, 2013). Despite this binary classification, the majority of pathogenic microbes employ a hemibiotrophic infection strategy, which is characterized by an initial biotrophic phase followed by a necrotrophic infection strategy at later stages of infection (Perfect and Green, 2001). The pathogenic fungi Magnaporthe grisea, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, and Mycosphaerella graminicola, the oomycete Phytophthora infestans, and the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae are examples of hemibiotrophic plant pathogens (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011; van Kan et al., 2014; Kabbage et al., 2015).Despite considerable progress in our understanding of plant resistance to necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens (Glazebrook, 2005; Mengiste, 2012; Lai and Mengiste, 2013), recent debate highlights the dynamic and complex interplay between plant-pathogenic microbes and their hosts, which is raising concerns about the use of infection strategies as a static tool to classify plant pathogens. For instance, the fungal genus Botrytis is often labeled as an archetypal necrotroph, even though there is evidence that it can behave as an endophytic fungus with a biotrophic lifestyle (van Kan et al., 2014). The rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae, which is often classified as a hemibiotrophic leaf pathogen (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011), can adopt a purely biotrophic lifestyle when infecting root tissues (Marcel et al., 2010). It remains unclear which signals are responsible for the switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy and whether these signals rely solely on the physiological state of the pathogen, or whether host-derived signals play a role as well (Kabbage et al., 2015).The plant hormones salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) play a central role in the activation of plant defenses (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012). The first evidence that biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens are resisted by different immune responses came from Thomma et al. (1998), who demonstrated that Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genotypes impaired in SA signaling show enhanced susceptibility to the biotrophic pathogen Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis (formerly known as Peronospora parastitica), while JA-insensitive genotypes were more susceptible to the necrotrophic fungus Alternaria brassicicola. In subsequent years, the differential effectiveness of SA- and JA-dependent defense mechanisms has been confirmed in different plant-pathogen interactions, while additional plant hormones, such as ethylene, abscisic acid (ABA), auxins, and cytokinins, have emerged as regulators of SA- and JA-dependent defenses (Bari and Jones, 2009; Cao et al., 2011; Pieterse et al., 2012). Moreover, SA- and JA-dependent defense pathways have been shown to act antagonistically on each other, which allows plants to prioritize an appropriate defense response to attack by biotrophic pathogens, necrotrophic pathogens, or herbivores (Koornneef and Pieterse, 2008; Pieterse et al., 2009; Verhage et al., 2010).In addition to plant hormones, reactive oxygen species (ROS) play an important regulatory role in plant defenses (Torres et al., 2006; Lehmann et al., 2015). Within minutes after the perception of pathogen-associated molecular patterns, NADPH oxidases and apoplastic peroxidases generate early ROS bursts (Torres et al., 2002; Daudi et al., 2012; O’Brien et al., 2012), which activate downstream defense signaling cascades (Apel and Hirt, 2004; Torres et al., 2006; Miller et al., 2009; Mittler et al., 2011; Lehmann et al., 2015). ROS play an important regulatory role in the deposition of callose (Luna et al., 2011; Pastor et al., 2013) and can also stimulate SA-dependent defenses (Chaouch et al., 2010; Yun and Chen, 2011; Wang et al., 2014; Mammarella et al., 2015). However, the spread of SA-induced apoptosis during hyperstimulation of the plant immune system is contained by the ROS-generating NADPH oxidase RBOHD (Torres et al., 2005), presumably to allow for the sufficient generation of SA-dependent defense signals from living cells that are adjacent to apoptotic cells. Nitric oxide (NO) plays an additional role in the regulation of SA/ROS-dependent defense (Trapet et al., 2015). This gaseous molecule can stimulate ROS production and cell death in the absence of SA while preventing excessive ROS production at high cellular SA levels via S-nitrosylation of RBOHD (Yun et al., 2011). Recently, it was shown that pathogen-induced accumulation of NO and ROS promotes the production of azelaic acid, a lipid derivative that primes distal plants for SA-dependent defenses (Wang et al., 2014). Hence, NO, ROS, and SA are intertwined in a complex regulatory network to mount local and systemic resistance against biotrophic pathogens. Interestingly, pathogens with a necrotrophic lifestyle can benefit from ROS/SA-dependent defenses and associated cell death (Govrin and Levine, 2000). For instance, Kabbage et al. (2013) demonstrated that S. sclerotiorum utilizes oxalic acid to repress oxidative defense signaling during initial biotrophic colonization, but it stimulates apoptosis at later stages to advance necrotrophic colonization. Moreover, SA-induced repression of JA-dependent resistance not only benefits necrotrophic pathogens but also hemibiotrophic pathogens after having switched from biotrophy to necrotrophy (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012).Plectosphaerella cucumerina ((P. cucumerina, anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) is a filamentous ascomycete fungus that can survive saprophytically in soil by decomposing plant material (Palm et al., 1995). The fungus can cause sudden death and blight disease in a variety of crops (Chen et al., 1999; Harrington et al., 2000). Because P. cucumerina can infect Arabidopsis leaves, the P. cucumerina-Arabidopsis interaction has emerged as a popular model system in which to study plant defense reactions to necrotrophic fungi (Berrocal-Lobo et al., 2002; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Carlucci et al., 2012; Ramos et al., 2013). Various studies have shown that Arabidopsis deploys a wide range of inducible defense strategies against P. cucumerina, including JA-, SA-, ABA-, and auxin-dependent defenses, glucosinolates (Tierens et al., 2001; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014), callose deposition (García-Andrade et al., 2011; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012), and ROS (Tierens et al., 2002; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Barna et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Recent metabolomics studies have revealed large-scale metabolic changes in P. cucumerina-infected Arabidopsis, presumably to mobilize chemical defenses (Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Furthermore, various chemical agents have been reported to induce resistance against P. cucumerina. These chemicals include β-amino-butyric acid, which primes callose deposition and SA-dependent defenses, benzothiadiazole (BTH or Bion; Görlach et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), which activates SA-related defenses (Lawton et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Gamir et al., 2014; Luna et al., 2014), JA (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), and ABA, which primes ROS and callose deposition (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Pastor et al., 2013). However, among all these studies, there is increasing controversy about the exact signaling pathways and defense responses contributing to plant resistance against P. cucumerina. While it is clear that JA and ethylene contribute to basal resistance against the fungus, the exact roles of SA, ABA, and ROS in P. cucumerina resistance vary between studies (Thomma et al., 1998; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2014).This study is based on the observation that the disease phenotype during P. cucumerina infection differs according to the inoculation method used. We provide evidence that the fungus follows a hemibiotrophic infection strategy when infecting from relatively low spore densities on the leaf surface. By contrast, when challenged by localized host defense to relatively high spore densities, the fungus switches to a necrotrophic infection program. Our study has uncovered a novel strategy by which plant-pathogenic fungi can take advantage of the early immune response in the host plant.     

Comparative Analysis of Light-Harvesting Antennae and State Transition in chlorina and cpSRP Mutants

State transitions in photosynthesis provide for the dynamic allocation of a mobile fraction of light-harvesting complex II (LHCII) to photosystem II (PSII) in state I and to photosystem I (PSI) in state II. In the state I-to-state II transition, LHCII is phosphorylated by STN7 and associates with PSI to favor absorption cross-section of PSI. Here, we used Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants with defects in chlorophyll (Chl) b biosynthesis or in the chloroplast signal recognition particle (cpSRP) machinery to study the flexible formation of PS-LHC supercomplexes. Intriguingly, we found that impaired Chl b biosynthesis in chlorina1-2 (ch1-2) led to preferentially stabilized LHCI rather than LHCII, while the contents of both LHCI and LHCII were equally depressed in the cpSRP43-deficient mutant (chaos). In view of recent findings on the modified state transitions in LHCI-deficient mutants (Benson et al., 2015), the ch1-2 and chaos mutants were used to assess the influence of varying LHCI/LHCII antenna size on state transitions. Under state II conditions, LHCII-PSI supercomplexes were not formed in both ch1-2 and chaos plants. LHCII phosphorylation was drastically reduced in ch1-2, and the inactivation of STN7 correlates with the lack of state transitions. In contrast, phosphorylated LHCII in chaos was observed to be exclusively associated with PSII complexes, indicating a lack of mobile LHCII in chaos. Thus, the comparative analysis of ch1-2 and chaos mutants provides new evidence for the flexible organization of LHCs and enhances our understanding of the reversible allocation of LHCII to the two photosystems.In oxygenic photosynthesis, PSII and PSI function in series to convert light energy into the chemical energy that fuels multiple metabolic processes. Most of this light energy is captured by the chlorophyll (Chl) and carotenoid pigments in the light-harvesting antenna complexes (LHCs) that are peripherally associated with the core complexes of both photosystems (Wobbe et al., 2016). However, since the two photosystems exhibit different absorption spectra (Nelson and Yocum, 2006; Nield and Barber, 2006; Qin et al., 2015), PSI or PSII is preferentially excited under naturally fluctuating light intensities and qualities. To optimize photosynthetic electron transfer, the excitation state of the two photosystems must be rebalanced in response to changes in lighting conditions. To achieve this, higher plants and green algae require rapid and precise acclimatory mechanisms to adjust the relative absorption cross-sections of the two photosystems.To date, the phenomenon of state transitions is one of the well-documented short-term acclimatory mechanisms. It allows a mobile portion of the light-harvesting antenna complex II (LHCII) to be allocated to either photosystem, depending on the spectral composition and intensity of the ambient light (Allen and Forsberg, 2001; Rochaix, 2011; Goldschmidt-Clermont and Bassi, 2015; Gollan et al., 2015). State transitions are driven by the redox state of the plastoquinone (PQ) pool (Vener et al., 1997; Zito et al., 1999). When PSI is preferentially excited (by far-red light), the PQ pool is oxidized and all the LHCII is associated with PSII. This allocation of antenna complexes is defined as state I. When light conditions (blue/red light or low light) favor exciton trapping of PSII, the transition from state I to state II occurs. The over-reduced PQ pool triggers the activation of the membrane-localized Ser-Thr kinase STN7, which phosphorylates an N-terminal Thr on each of two major LHCII proteins, LHCB1 and LHCB2 (Allen, 1992; Bellafiore et al., 2005; Shapiguzov et al., 2016). Phosphorylation of LHCII results in the dissociation of LHCII from PSII and triggers its reversible relocation to PSI (Allen, 1992; Rochaix, 2011). Conversely, when the PQ pool is reoxidized, STN7 is inactivated and the constitutively active, thylakoid-associated phosphatase TAP38/PPH1 dephosphorylates LHCII, which then reassociates with PSII (Pribil et al., 2010; Shapiguzov et al., 2010). The physiological significance of state transitions has been demonstrated by the reduction in growth rate seen in the stn7 knock-out mutant under fluctuating light conditions (Bellafiore et al., 2005; Tikkanen et al., 2010).The canonical state transitions model implies spatial and temporal regulation of the allocation of LHC between the two spatially segregated photosystems (Dekker and Boekema, 2005). PSII-LHCII supercomplexes are organized in a tightly packed form in the stacked grana regions of thylakoid membranes, while PSI-LHCI supercomplexes are mainly localized in the nonstacked stromal lamellae and grana margin regions (Dekker and Boekema, 2005; Haferkamp et al., 2010). It has been proposed that, in the grana margin regions, which harbor LHCII and both photosystems, LHCII can migrate rapidly between them (Albertsson et al., 1990; Albertsson, 2001). This idea is supported by the recent discovery of mega complexes containing both photosystems in the grana margin regions (Yokono et al., 2015). Furthermore, phosphorylation of LHCII was found to increase not only the amount of PSI found in the grana margin region of thylakoid membranes (Tikkanen et al., 2008a), but also to modulate the pattern of PSI-PSII megacomplexes under changing light conditions (Suorsa et al., 2015). Nonetheless, open questions remain in relation to the physiological significance of the detection of phosphorylated LHCII in all thylakoid regions, even under the constant light conditions (Grieco et al., 2012; Leoni et al., 2013; Wientjes et al., 2013), although LHCII phosphorylation has been shown to modify the stacking of thylakoid membranes (Chuartzman et al., 2008; Pietrzykowska et al., 2014).State I-to-state II transition is featured by the formation of LHCII-PSI-LHCI supercomplexes, in which LHCII favors the light-harvesting capacity of PSI. Recently, LHCII-PSI-LHCI supercomplexes have been successfully isolated and purified using various detergents (Galka et al., 2012; Drop et al., 2014; Crepin and Caffarri, 2015) or a styrene-maleic acid copolymer (Bell et al., 2015). These findings yielded further insights into the reorganization of supercomplexes associated with state transitions, and it was suggested that phosphorylation of LHCB2 rather than LHCB1 is the essential trigger for the formation of state transition supercomplexes (Leoni et al., 2013; Pietrzykowska et al., 2014; Crepin and Caffarri, 2015; Longoni et al., 2015). Furthermore, characterization of mutants deficient in individual PSI core subunits indicates that PsaH, L, and I are required for docking of LHCII at PSI (Lunde et al., 2000; Zhang and Scheller, 2004; Kouril et al., 2005; Plöchinger et al., 2016).Recently, the state transition capacity has been characterized in the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants with missing LHCI components. Although the Arabidopsis knock-out mutants lacking one of the four LHCI proteins (LHCA1-4) showed enhanced accumulation of LHCII-PSI complexes, the absorption cross-section of PSI under state II conditions was still compromised in the lhca1-4 mutants, and it is suggested that LHCI mediates the detergent-sensitive interaction between ‘extra LHCII’ and PSI (Benson et al., 2015; Grieco et al., 2015). Furthermore, the Arabidopsis mutant ΔLhca lacking all LHCA1-4 proteins was shown to be compensated for the deficiency of LHCI by binding LHCII under state II conditions (Bressan et al., 2016). In spite of this finding, the significant reduction in the absorption cross-section of PSI was still observed in the ΔLhca mutant, suggesting a substantial role of LHCI in light absorption under canopy conditions (Bressan et al., 2016). However, these findings emphasize the acclimatory function of state transitions in balancing light absorption capacity between the two photosystems by modifying their relative antenna size and imply the dynamic and variable organization of PS-LHC supercomplexes.LHC proteins are encoded by the nuclear Lhc superfamily (Jansson, 1994). The biogenesis of LHCs includes the cytoplasmic synthesis of the LHC precursor proteins, their translocation into chloroplasts via the TOC/TIC complex, and their posttranslational targeting and integration into the thylakoid membranes by means of the chloroplast signal recognition particle (cpSRP) machinery (Jarvis and Lopez-Juez, 2013). The posttranslational cpSRP-dependent pathway for the final translocation of LHC proteins into the thylakoid membrane includes interaction of cpSRP43 with LHC apo-proteins and recruitment of cpSRP54 to form a transit complex. Then binding of this tripartite cpSRP transit complex to the SRP receptor cpFtsY follows, which supports docking of the transit complex to thylakoid membranes and its association with the LHC translocase ALB3. Ultimately, ALB3 inserts LHC apo-proteins into the thylakoid membrane (Richter et al., 2010). Importantly, stoichiometric amounts of newly synthesized Chl a and Chl b as well as carotenoid are inserted into the LHC apo-proteins by unknown mechanisms to form the functional LHCs that associate with the core complexes of both photosystems in the thylakoid membranes (Dall’Osto et al., 2015; Wang and Grimm, 2015).The first committed steps in Chl synthesis occur in the Mg branch of the tetrapyrrole biosynthesis pathway. 5-Aminolevulinic acid synthesis provides the precursor for the formation of protoporphyrin IX, which is directed into the Mg branch (Tanaka and Tanaka, 2007; Brzezowski et al., 2015). Chl synthesis ends with the conversion of Chl a to Chl b catalyzed by Chl a oxygenase (CAO; Tanaka et al., 1998; Tomitani et al., 1999). It has been hypothesized that coordination between Chl synthesis and the posttranslational cpSRP pathway is a prerequisite for the efficient integration of Chls into LHC apo-proteins.In this study, we intend to characterize the assembly of LHCs when the availability of Chl molecules or the integration of LHC apo-proteins into thylakoid membranes is limiting. To this end, we compared the assembly of LHCs and the organization of PS-LHC complexes in two different sets of Arabidopsis mutants. Firstly, we used the chlorina1-2 (ch1-2) mutant, which is defective in the CAO gene. The members of the second set of mutants carry knock-out mutations in genes involved in the chloroplast SRP pathway (Richter et al., 2010).Our studies revealed distinct accumulation of PS-LHC supercomplexes between the two sets of mutant relative to wild-type plants. In spite of the defect in synthesis of Chl b, ch1-2 retains predominantly intact PSI-LHCI supercomplexes but has strongly reduced amounts of LHCII. In contrast, the chaos (cpSRP43) mutant exhibits synchronously reduced contents of both LHCI and LHCII, which results in the accumulation of PS core complexes without accompanying LHCs. Thus, the distribution of LHCs in the thylakoid membranes of the two mutants, ch1-2 and chaos, were explored under varying light conditions with the aim of elucidating the influence of modified LHCI/LHCII antenna size on state transitions. Our results contribute to an expanding view on the variety of photosynthetic complexes, which can be observed in Arabidopsis plants with specified mutations in LHC biogenesis.