BI-RADS 3级对乳腺病灶患者的诊断结果及影响因素分析

目的:回顾性分析超声BI-RADS 3级对乳腺病灶患者的诊断结果及影响因素。方法:选择2014年8月至2017年8月上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院和复旦大学附属华山医院北院收治的168例乳腺病灶患者,回顾性分析其影像学资料及病理分析结果。分析BI-RADS 3级对乳腺病灶的阴性诊断率,采用Kim分级对BI-RADS 3级结果进行重新分级,分析影响BI-RADS分级及重新分级的主要因素。结果:168例BI-RADS 3级乳腺病灶中,159例为良性病变,9例为恶性。168例BI-RADS 3级乳腺病灶的阳性预测值为5.4%(9/168),阴性预测值为94.6%(159/168)。病灶数目、年龄、医师年资、病灶大小对BI-RADS 3级良恶性乳腺病灶判断无明显影响,而BI-RADS 3级恶性乳腺病灶较良性病灶更易触诊(P 0.05)。重新分级发现,124例仍为BI-RADS 3级,44例上升至BI-RADS 4级,重新分级恶性病灶的检出率为100%(9/9),假阳性率为20.8%(35/168)。病灶多发、年龄≥40岁更可能评估为BI-RADS 4级(P0.05),医师年资、病灶大小、病灶触及情况对重新分级无明显影响(P0.05)。结论:BI-RADS 3级对乳腺良性病灶有较高的阴性诊断率,重新分级可提高乳腺恶性病灶的检出率,但会造成较高的假阳性率,影响BI-RADS分级的主要因素为病灶可否扪及,影响重新分级的主要因素为患者年龄及乳腺病灶是否多发。     

VTIQ结合CDFI极大提高对乳腺BI-RADS 4类良恶性病变的诊断效能

为探讨声触诊组织成像定量技术(VTIQ)联合彩色多普勒血流成像(CDFI)在乳腺BI-RADS4类良恶性病变中的诊断价值,本研究选取66个经病理证实的BI-RADS 4类乳腺结节患者,根据VTIQ、CDFI图像资料,获取患者乳腺结节剪切波速度平均值及血流分级,分析良恶性结节之间剪切波速度平均值及血流分级的差异,分析VTIQ、CDFI单独使用及联合应用对乳腺BI-RADS 4类良恶性结节的诊断价值。研究结果显示66例病灶中良性32例,恶性34例,CDFI诊断灵敏度、特异度、准确度分别为85.3%、53.1%、69.7%;良恶性结节剪切波速度平均值分别为(3.14±1.06) m/s、(5.44±1.58) m/s,两者差异有统计学意义(p0.05),构建受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线),得到良恶性结节最佳截断点为4.07 m/s,以此诊断的敏感度、特异度、准确度分别为67.6%、87.5%、77.3%;乳腺恶性肿瘤中有38.2%(13/34)的病灶在弹性图像上出现周边高硬度彩色区域,呈"硬环征",以此诊断的敏感度、特异度、准确度分别为38.2%、93.8%、65.2%;VTIQ与CDFI联合应用诊断乳腺BI-RADS 4类良恶性结节的灵敏度、特异性、准确度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为91.2%、93.8%、92.4%、93.9%、90.9%。结果表明VTIQ、CDFI对乳腺BI-RADS4类良恶性病变的诊断具有一定参考价值,弹性图像上硬环征的出现有助于乳腺恶性肿瘤的诊断,VTIQ与CDFI合应用明显提高对BI-RADS 4类乳腺良恶性病变的诊断效能。     

剪切波弹性成像在乳腺实性病变良恶性鉴别中的诊断价值

目的:探讨剪切波弹性成像在乳腺实性病变良恶性鉴别中的诊断价值。方法:收集2012年3月-2013年6月于我院收治的乳腺实性病变患者54例,共65个病灶,先后给予乳腺二维超声检查与剪切波弹性成像检查,采用弹性模量值与钼靶BI-RADS分级方法诊断,比较两种方法诊断的准确性。结果:良性病灶组弹性最小、最大值以及平均值、标准差与恶性病灶组比较差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);ROC曲线分析显示,在乳腺实性病变良恶性的鉴别中,弹性最大值明显优于平弹性均值;剪切波弹性成像对乳腺实性病变良恶性鉴别的敏感度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值高于二维超声技术(P0.05)。结论:剪切波弹性成像在乳腺实性病变良恶性鉴别中具有良好的诊断价值,能够提高诊断的准确性。     

钼靶和超声检查在乳腺癌临床诊断的准确性的比较分析

摘要 目的：比较与分析钼靶和超声检查在乳腺癌临床诊断的准确性。方法：2018年8月到2021年1月选择在本院进行诊治的乳腺肿瘤患者110例作为研究对象,所有患者都给予钼靶和超声检查,记录影像学特征并判断诊断价值。结果：在110例患者中,病理诊断为乳腺良性肿瘤76例、乳腺癌34例。恶性组钼靶的分叶征、钙化、大角征、毛刺征等比例高于良性组,病灶大小也高于良性组(P<0.05)。恶性组超声的形态不规则、边缘不光整、高回声晕、回声衰减、微钙化等比例高于良性组(P<0.05)。钼靶乳腺影像报告及数据系统(Breast imaging report and data system,BI-RADS)判断为乳腺良性肿瘤72例,乳腺癌38例;超声BI-RADS判断为乳腺良性肿瘤75例,乳腺癌35例,钼靶鉴别诊断乳腺癌的敏感性为93.4%,特异性为97.1%,准确性为94.5%;超声鉴别诊断乳腺癌的敏感性为98.7%,特异性为100.0%,准确性为99.1%。多因素logistic回归分析显示病灶大小、分叶征、回声衰减、毛刺征为导致误诊的重要因素(P<0.05)。结论：乳腺癌在钼靶和超声检查中都有明显的征象特征,超声诊断的准确性更高,病灶大小、分叶征、回声衰减、毛刺征为影响诊断效果的很重要因素。     

声触诊组织定量成像联合声诺维超声造影对乳腺BI-RADS 4类结节的鉴别诊断价值

摘要 目的：探讨声触诊组织定量成像（VTIQ）联合声诺维超声造影对乳腺BI-RADS 4类结节的鉴别诊断价值。方法：将我院2018年6月至2019年12月门诊及住院诊治的90例女性乳腺结节患者作为研究对象,利用VTIQ超声弹性成像技术,获取剪切波速度最大值（SWVmax）、剪切波速度最小值（SWVmin）、剪切波速度平均值（SWVmean）,声诺维超声造影评估病灶回声、形态、血管充盈情况。以手术病理或超声引导穿刺活检病理结果作为金标准,分析VTIQ超声弹性成像联合声诺维超声造影对乳腺BI-RADS 4类结节的鉴别诊断价值。结果：90例患者（90个乳腺结节）中,经手术病理检查62例,经超声引导穿刺活检28例,其中良性结节48例,恶性结节42例。乳腺BI-RADS 4类良性及恶性结节的SWVmax、SWVmin及SWVmean比较有统计学差异（P<0.05）;以SWVmax≥3.83 m/s作为截断点,鉴别诊断乳腺BI-RADS 4类良恶性结节的曲线下面积（AUC）、敏感度、特异度分别为0.875、83.33%、91.67%,均高于SWVmin及SWVmean。SWVmax、声诺维超声造影与联合诊断的准确率比较无统计学差异（P>0.05）。SWVmax联合声诺维超声造影检查在鉴别诊断乳腺BI-RADS 4类良恶性结节的AUC、敏感度、特异度分别为0.914、95.24%、87.50%,诊断效能最佳。结论：声诺维超声造影、VTIQ超声弹性成像在乳腺BI-RADS 4类结节鉴别诊断中有一定的价值,VTIQ超声弹性成像的SWVmax参数诊断效能优于SWVmin及SWVmean,VTIQ超声弹性成像联合声诺维超声造影可提升乳腺BI-RADS 4类结节鉴别诊断效能。     

超声引导下Mammotome微创旋切术治疗乳腺良性肿块

目的:研究超声引导下Mammotome微创旋切术对乳腺良性肿块的治疗价值。方法:回顾性分析2014年9月至2016年9月在本院就诊的BI-RADS分级为2~3级的387例乳腺良性肿块患者,运用Mammotome对729处乳腺病灶行微创旋切术,分析术后病理、并发症、随访半年后的治疗结果。结果:387例患者的729处乳腺病灶均获一次性成功切除。病理示均为良性病灶,其中32个合并不典型增生。术后出现局部血肿共11例(2.8%),皮下瘀斑共16例(4.1%),所有患者均未发生感染及气胸等严重并发症。术后6个月18个在病灶原部位发现肿块;手术无残留率为97.5%。结论:应用超声引导下Mammotome微创旋切术治疗乳腺良性肿块临床可行。     

乳腺肿块X线检查常见漏、误诊原因的病例分析

目的:分析乳腺X线检查的误漏诊原因,提高诊断准确性。方法:选择2011年3月至2013年12月来我院就诊的135例经乳腺X线摄影和病理检查证实的乳腺肿瘤患者为研究对象,将X线摄影结果与病理检查结果对比,进行回顾性的分析。结果:病理诊断72例良性肿瘤而X线误诊为恶性7例(误诊率9.72%);63例恶性肿瘤而X线误诊为良性5例(漏诊率7.93%)。结论:乳腺X线误诊与乳腺致密程度、患者年龄以及肿瘤形态相关。掌握拍片技术减少技术性误差,提高影像质量,诊断时仔细阅片并熟知各类型乳腺疾病的特征性X影像表象,并与临床相结合,增强责任心,可减少乳腺X线检查的误漏诊。     

高频超声引导下导丝定位在不可触及乳腺包块切除术中的应用

目的:探讨高频超声引导下导丝定位在不可触及乳腺包块切除术中的应用价值。方法:回顾性分析90例临床不可触及但超声提示为乳腺包块的患者的临床资料,其中50例在高频超声引导乳腺病灶体表定位下行乳腺病灶切除术,40例在高频超声引导导丝定位下行乳腺病灶切除术。比较两组术前定位时间、手术时间、切除组织量/肿物组织量及术后并发症的发生情况、术后病理诊断及术后超声随访情况。结果:与体表定位组比较,导丝定位组定位时间显著延长(P0.05),手术时间明显缩短(P0.05),切除组织量/肿物组织量显著减小(P0.05)。体表定位组出现2例切口感染,5例血肿,两组不良反应的发生率相比差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。体表定位组良性48例(96.0%),恶性病灶2例(4.0%)。导丝定位组良性病灶36例(90.0%),恶性病灶4例(10.0%)。两组病理诊断为良/恶病灶的比例无统计学意义(P0.05)。术后超声随访6~12个月,病灶切除情况比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:高频超声引导下导丝定位精确,可明显缩短手术时间,减少对正常乳腺组织的破坏,可作为行不可触及乳腺包块切除术的优先选择。     

乳腺良恶性病变剪切波弹性成像的典型表现及其鉴别诊断价值

目的:观察乳腺良恶性病变的剪切波弹性成像(SWE)的典型表现,探讨SWE对乳腺良恶性病变的鉴别诊断价值。方法:选取2017年6月～2019年6月我院收治的162例行SWE检查的乳腺肿块患者,经组织活检或病理证实良性肿块105例(良性组)、恶性肿块57例(恶性组)。对比良、恶性组SWE的典型表现、SWE参数[最大值(Emax)、最小值(Emin)、平均值(Emean)、标准差(SD)、病灶与邻近脂肪弹性比值(SWE-Ratio)]的差异,分析SWE鉴别诊断乳腺良恶性病变的价值。结果:恶性组乳腺肿块"硬边征"检出率、Ⅲ型～Ⅴ型弹性图像检出率、Emax、Emean、SD、SWE-Ratio均高于良性组(P0.05),Emin低于良性组(P0.05)。Logistic多元回归分析结果显示,"硬边征"、Emax、Emean、SWE-Ratio与病理诊断乳腺肿块性质独立相关(P0.05)。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析结果显示,"硬边征"、Emax、Emean、SWE-Ratio鉴别诊断乳腺良恶性病变的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.923、0.686、0.873、0.879。结论:SWE是诊断乳腺良恶性病变的有效影像手段,SWE的"硬边征"、SWE-Ratio、Emean对乳腺良恶性病变具有较高的鉴别价值。     

乳腺良性肿块与乳腺癌患者的超声弹性成像对比

目的:对比乳腺良性肿块与乳腺癌患者的超声弹性成像,明确超声弹性成像的应用价值。方法:选取2014年5月-2016年1月我院乳腺肿块患者128人次共146例肿块,根据病理结果分为乳腺良性肿块和乳腺癌,比较超声弹性成像与病理结果。结果:128个患者共计肿块146例,99例结节为良性肿块,其中32例为乳腺纤维腺瘤,29例为乳腺增生结节,20例为乳腺脂肪瘤,6例为乳腺血管脂肪瘤,4例为乳腺导管腺瘤,8例为乳腺导管内乳头状瘤;47例肿块为恶性,其中37例肿块为浸润性导管癌,9例肿块为粘液腺癌,1例肿块为硬癌。乳腺良性肿块患者81人次共99例,其中1分43例(43.43%),2分34例(34.34%),3分18例(18.18%),4分4例(4.04%);乳腺癌患者47例,其中3分9例(19.15%),4分20例(42.55%),5分18例(38.30%)。超声弹性成像鉴别乳腺良性肿块与乳腺癌的灵敏度为95.96%,特异性为80.85%,准确度为91.10%,阴性预测值为90.48%,阳性预测值为91.35%。结论:超声弹性成像鉴别乳腺良性肿块与乳腺癌的灵敏度高达95.96%,具有较高准确度,可辅助诊断乳腺疾病。     

Fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast. Experience at an outpatient breast clinic

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of the breast at our institution and to perform quality assurance. STUDY DESIGN: Two hundred forty-six cases with pathologic confirmation were selected and reviewed. A pathologist performed most of the aspirations at an outpatient breast clinic. We correlated cytologic and histologic findings and evaluated the influence of the size, location, grade, and pathologic subtypes and fibrosis in breast lesions on diagnostic results. RESULTS: The likelihood ratios for malignant, suspicious, atypical, benign and unsatisfactory cytologic diagnoses were 98.71, 5.48, 1.09, 0.07 and 0.55, respectively. The absolute and complete sensitivities for malignant lesions were 64.5% and 90.3%, respectively. The specificity was 71.9%. False negative and positive rates were 4.3% and 0.7%, respectively. The predictive value for a malignant cytologic diagnosis was 98.4%. The rate of unsatisfactory samples was 9.3%. The rate of concordance between cytologic and histologic diagnosis was lower for large and diffusely growing lesions (benign and malignant), for malignancies with abundant fibrosis and of unusual types and for carcinomas of low grade. All axillary and recurrent chest wall lesions were diagnosed cytologically. Cell block sections were useful in a small number of cases. CONCLUSION: Understanding the performance and limitations of FNAC can enhance its value as a diagnostic technique in the management of breast disease.     

A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Breast MR Imaging and Mammography on Patients with BI-RADS 3–5 Microcalcifications

Objective

To retrospectively investigate the diagnostic value of breast MRI in patients with BI-RADS 3–5 microcalcifications in mammography.

Methods

Eighty-four patients with BI-RADS 3–5 microcalcifications on mammography underwent breast MR exams before surgical biopsy with a hookwire position under mammographic guidance. Two radiologists reviewed each lesion with BI-RADS by consensus. The diagnostic value of mammography and MRI was compared.

Results

Histopathological examination revealed 49 benign lesions and 42 malignant lesions. In the assessments of mammography, 21 lesions (23.1%) were assigned to category 3, 51 lesions (56.0%) to category 4, and 19 lesions (20.9%) to category 5. The area under the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve for mammography and MR assessment was 0.844, and 0.945, respectively (p<0.05). In cases of category 3 microcalcifications, the specificity of mammography and MR was 100%, and 95.2% (p = 1.000), respectively. In cases of category 4 microcalcifications, the specificity, PPV and accuracy of mammography was 0%, 45.1% and 45.1%; whereas those for MR was 82.1% (p<0.05), 80.8% (P = 0.003) and 86.3% (p<0.05). All microcalcifications of category 5 were correctly diagnosed by mammography and MR.

Conclusions

Breast MRI has the potential to significantly improve the diagnosis of category 4 microcalcifications on mammography. Among mammographic category 4 microcalcifications, about 82% of benign lesions can be degraded to BI-RADS 1∼3 by MRI. However for microcalcifications of category 3 and 5, MR exams do not show significant improvement over mammography.     

超声弹性成像组织弥散定量分析诊断宫颈良恶性病变的临床效果

目的:探讨超声弹性成像组织弥散定量分析诊断宫颈良恶性病变中的临床效果。方法:选择2018年2月到2019年7月在我院诊治的宫颈病变患者88例,包括病理检查为良性病变68例(良性组)和恶性病变20例(恶性组)。所有患者都给予常规超声、多普勒血流超声与超声弹性成像组织弥散定量分析,记录影像学特征,分析诊断效果。结果:恶性组的超声血流分级2级和3级、超声弹性成像半定量评分4分和5分显著高于良性组(P0.05)。恶性组SR值显著高于良性组(P0.05)。超声弹性成像组织弥散定量诊断宫颈良恶性病变的敏感性与特异性分别为95.6%和95.0%。ROC曲线结果显示超声弹性成像组织弥散定量诊断宫颈良恶性病变的AUC值为0.914。结论:超声弹性成像组织弥散定量分析能有效诊断宫颈良恶性病变,敏感性与特异性均较高。     

动态增强磁共振扫描与超声弹性成像对乳腺癌的诊断价值探讨

目的:探讨动态增强磁共振成像扫描与超声弹性成像对乳腺癌良恶性肿瘤的诊断价值,为临床诊断提供影像学依据。方法:回顾性分析2009年10月至2013年5月在我院经穿刺或手术病理证实为乳腺癌的59例患者的临床资料,患者术前均行超声与动态增强MR检查。依据病理组织活检和临床随访分别评价动态增强MR和UE对乳腺癌诊断的准确性。结果:DCE-MRI检测共发现病灶59个,55个初步诊断乳腺恶性肿瘤(BI-RADS 4-5),4个诊断为良性(BI-RADS 3),诊断准确率为93.22%(55/59)。UE对59个病灶进行评分,54个评分为乳腺恶性肿瘤,5个评分为良性,诊断率为91.53%(54/59)。UE检测乳腺癌的敏感性明显低于DCE-MRI及DCE-MRI+UE,DCE-MRI检测乳腺癌的特异性明显低于UE及DCE-MRI+UE,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。DCE-MRI+UE诊断乳腺癌的准确率为96.61%(57/59),明显高于DCE-MRI或UE单独检测的准确率(P0.05)。结论:动态增强MR诊断乳腺癌的敏感性较高,而超声弹性成像的特异性较好,两者联合可提高诊断准确率,对乳腺癌的早期诊断具有重要的临床应用价值。     

Differential diagnosis of oncocytic lesions of the breast and thyroid utilizing a semiquantitative approach.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a light microscopic, semiquantitative approach could reliably distinguish between benign nonneoplastic, benign neoplastic and malignant oncocytic lesions of the breast and thyroid. STUDY DESIGN: Alcohol-fixed, Papanicolaou-stained fine needle aspiration smears of histologically proven goiter and chronic thyroiditis (18 cases), Hürthle cell adenomas (7 cases), Hürthle cell carcinomas (6 cases), fibrocystic disease (17 cases), papillomas and papillomatosis (7 cases) and apocrine carcinomas (6 cases) were rated by three independent observers using the following 10 cytologic criteria: cellularity, nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio, multinucleation, nuclear size, nuclear shape, anisonucleosis, multinucleolation, nucleolar-nuclear ratio, nucleolar size and nucleolar shape. Each of these 10 cytologic criteria was rated using a 1-3 scale. The scores for all 10 features were summed to give a total score for each case. The total scores were statistically analyzed to determine the validity and reproducibility of the summed criteria. RESULTS: The summed criteria of the total scores were reproducible between the three observers, with standard deviations ranging from 1.36 to 2.88 for thyroid and 1.72 to 2.00 for breast oncocytic lesions. The ability of the total scores to differentiate benign from malignant oncocytic lesions of the breast and thyroid was confirmed by a positive predictive value for malignancy of 67% for thyroid and 72% for breast and a negative predictive value for malignancy of 100% for nonneoplastic oncocytic lesions and > 90% for benign oncocytic neoplasms in both. The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed that the total scores were able to distinguish three diagnostic categories of nonneoplastic, benign neoplastic and malignant oncocytic breast and thyroid lesions, with P < .005. CONCLUSION: Without the expenditures of additional time, costs or materials, this semiquantitative approach compared favorably with contemporary morphometric studies involving the differential diagnosis of oncocytic cell pathology in fine needle aspiration cytology.     

The value of dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI in mammographically detected BI-RADS 5 microcalcifications

Aims: To evaluate the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of BI-RADS-5 type of microcalcifications of the breast, to compare the size of the microcalcification lesions using mammography (MG) and MRI, and to determine the value of MRI in surgery for microcalcifications. The study also determines the morphology of microcalcification lesions, assesses kinetic curves and compare MRI features of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) for different histopathological grades. Methods: Our group consisted of 32 patients with mammographically detected BI-RADS 5 microcalcifications. The MRI was done in this group of women which was later followed by stereotactic vaccum-assisted biopsy (SVAB). Surgery was performed on all patients with a biopsy that resulted in a diagnosis of breast cancer or atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH). Results: Of our group of 32 patients, there were 35 mammograhically detected microcalcification lesions, 32 DCIS, one ADH and two benign findings according to the final histology. The microcalcification lesions were larger using MRI than in MG in 10 women. We diagnosed DCIS multifocality in 6 women and bilateral carcinoma in one woman. As with kinetic curve assessment, we found in 67 % of DCIS a rapid rise, 27 % a moderate and in 6 % a slow initial rise. With the pattern of enhancement in the delayed phase, we found in 30 % of DCIS a washout pattern, 67 % a plateau and in 3 % a persistent pattern. Noted difference between high and low grade DCIS was confirmed. Conclusions: MRI sensitivity in the detection of DCIS was 94 % in our group of patients and was the sole evidence for detection of multifocality and bilateral incidence of carcinoma. In 26 % of women the outcome of MRI was the most important for converting breast conserving surgery to mastectomy.     

Differentiation of Malignant and Benign Incidental Breast Lesions Detected by Chest Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography: Added Value of Quantitative Enhancement Analysis

To retrospectively determine the association between breast lesion morphology and malignancy and to determine the optimal value of lesion enhancement (HU, Hounsfield units) to improve the diagnostic accuracy of breast cancer in patients with incidental breast lesions (IBLs). A total of 97 patients with 102 IBLs detected from July 2009 to December 2012 were enrolled in this study. Two radiologists analyzed CT images for the presence of malignancy based on the morphology of the lesions alone and in combination with an enhancement value (HU) analysis. There were 36 malignant and 66 benign IBLs. When the morphology and enhancement values were combined, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 92%, 97%, and 95%, respectively, for reader 1 and 89%, 94%, and 92%, respectively, for reader 2. The addition of HU values led to correct changes in the diagnosis; specifically, the accuracy of the diagnosis of reader 1 and reader 2 improved by 6.9% and 11.8%, respectively. The addition of the enhancement value (HU) to the CT morphology improved the diagnostic accuracy in the differentiation of malignant from benign IBLs by using the region of interest (ROI) to measure the HU within the most suspicious part of the lesion.     

3.0 T磁共振扩散加权成像在乳腺良恶性病变鉴别中的价值及较优b值下ADC值与预后因子相关性研究

摘要 目的：研究3.0 T磁共振扩散加权成像在乳腺良恶性病变鉴别中的价值及较优b值下ADC值与预后因子的相关性。方法：选取2017年11月～2019年11月于我院接受诊治的乳腺病变患者50例进行研究,将其按照良恶性差异分成恶性组40例与良性组10例,另取同期于我院体检的健康志愿者50例作为对照组。对所有人员均进行3.0 T磁共振扩散加权成像,比较不同b值下ADC值在不同乳腺组织中的差异,比较不同b值下诊断乳腺良恶性病变的效能,分析较优b值下ADC值和乳腺癌患者各项预后因子的相关性。结果：对照组、良性组、恶性组在不同b值下的ADC值均呈逐渐降低趋势（P＜0.05）;对照组、良性组、恶性组b值为1000 s/mm²下的ADC值均低于b值为600 s/mm²（P＜0.05）。b值为1000 s/mm²时诊断乳腺恶性病变的敏感度、特异度、准确度分别为92.50%、100.00%、94.00%,高于b值为600 s/mm²的70.00%、60.00%、68.00%（P＜0.05）。b值为1000 s/mm²下雌激素受体、孕激素受阳性患者的ADC值低于阴性患者,而人类表皮生长因子受体2阳性患者的ADC值高于阴性患者（P＜0.05）。经Spearman相关性分析可得,b值为1000 s/mm²下ADC值与雌激素受体、孕激素受体阳性表达均呈负相关关系,而与人类表皮生长因子受体2阳性表达呈正相关关系（P＜0.05）。结论：3.0 T磁共振扩散加权成像在乳腺良恶性病变鉴别中的价值较高,且以b值为1000 s/mm²的诊断能效较优。此外,b值下ADC值和乳腺癌部分预后因子表达状态密切相关。