椎弓根内固定联合椎体间植骨融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症的临床探讨

目的:探讨椎弓根内固定联合椎体间植骨融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析我院2012年3月至2014年3月收治的30例采用椎弓根内固定联合椎体间植骨融合术治疗的退行性腰椎滑脱症患者临床资料,观察患者对手术效果的满意度,并对症状进行JOA评分。比较患者术前术后的腰椎X线的影像学变化,观察术后临近节段的退变发生率与影像的融合率。结果:术后随访1-3年发现患者JOA评分的平均改善率为(73.81±16.12)%,术后滑脱率与椎间高度均有明显改善,与术前比较差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。术后影像学显示植骨融合A级15例,B级12例,C级3例,融合优良率为90%。结论:椎弓根内固定联合椎体间植骨融合术对退行性腰椎滑脱症具有显著的临床效果,不仅可以缓解疼痛,改善功能评分,而且使患者影像学变化恢复正常生理形态,是理想的手术方法之一。     

Finite Element Analysis of a New Pedicle Screw-Plate System for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Purpose

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) is increasingly popular for the surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar disc diseases. The constructs intended for segmental stability are varied in MI-TLIF. We adopted finite element (FE) analysis to compare the stability after different construct fixations using interbody cage with posterior pedicle screw-rod or pedicle screw-plate instrumentation system.

Methods

A L3–S1 FE model was modified to simulate decompression and fusion at L4–L5 segment. Fixation modes included unilateral plate (UP), unilateral rod (UR), bilateral plate (BP), bilateral rod (BR) and UP+UR fixation. The inferior surface of the S1 vertebra remained immobilized throughout the load simulation, and a bending moment of 7.5 Nm with 400N pre-load was applied on the L3 vertebra to recreate flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Range of motion (ROM) and Von Mises stress were evaluated for intact and instrumentation models in all loading planes.

Results

All reconstructive conditions displayed decreased motion at L4–L5. The pedicle screw-plate system offered equal ROM to pedicle screw-rod system in unilateral or bilateral fixation modes respectively. Pedicle screw stresses for plate system were 2.2 times greater than those for rod system in left lateral bending under unilateral fixation. Stresses for plate were 3.1 times greater than those for rod in right axial rotation under bilateral fixation. Stresses on intervertebral graft for plate system were similar to rod system in unilateral and bilateral fixation modes respectively. Increased ROM and posterior instrumentation stresses were observed in all loading modes with unilateral fixation compared with bilateral fixation in both systems.

Conclusions

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion augmentation with pedicle screw-plate system fixation increases fusion construct stability equally to the pedicle screw-rod system. Increased posterior instrumentation stresses are observed in all loading modes with plate fixation, and bilateral fixation could reduce stress concentration.     

Biomechanical differences of Coflex-F and pedicle screw fixation combined with TLIF or ALIF--a finite element study

Lumbar interbody fusion is a common procedure for treating lower back pain related to degenerative disc diseases. The Coflex-F is a recently developed interspinous spacer, the makers of which claim that it can provide stabilisation similar to pedicle screw fixation. Therefore, this study compares the biomechanical behaviour of the Coflex-F device and pedicle screw fixation with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) surgeries by using finite element analysis. The results show that the Coflex-F device combined with ALIF surgery can provide stability similar to the pedicle screw fixation combined with TLIF or ALIF surgery. Also, the posterior instrumentations (Coflex-F and pedicle screw fixation) combined with TLIF surgery had lower stability than when combined with ALIF surgery.     

Biomechanical differences of Coflex-F and pedicle screw fixation combined with TLIF or ALIF – a finite element study

Lumbar interbody fusion is a common procedure for treating lower back pain related to degenerative disc diseases. The Coflex-F is a recently developed interspinous spacer, the makers of which claim that it can provide stabilisation similar to pedicle screw fixation. Therefore, this study compares the biomechanical behaviour of the Coflex-F device and pedicle screw fixation with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) surgeries by using finite element analysis. The results show that the Coflex-F device combined with ALIF surgery can provide stability similar to the pedicle screw fixation combined with TLIF or ALIF surgery. Also, the posterior instrumentations (Coflex-F and pedicle screw fixation) combined with TLIF surgery had lower stability than when combined with ALIF surgery.     

腰椎弹性固定进展研究

对于腰椎退变和不稳的治疗,传统方法是采用后路减压、椎弓根螺钉固定同时行植骨术(僵硬固定)。然而,僵硬固定存在加速周围椎体的退变等缺点。因而,人们逐步把目光投向腰椎弹性固定。最近几年,腰椎弹性固定因具有利于应力分散,防止周围节段退行性变,降低应力遮挡等优点,越来越多地被用于临床。大多数临床资料显示相较于传统坚强固定,弹性固定疗效相当,而固定节段骨萎缩、骨质疏松以及邻近节段退变的发生率显著降低,更利于脊柱生理特性。该文就腰椎弹性固定的发展过程、各种类型弹性固定的工作原理以及临床效果等作一综述。     

Learning Curve of Full-Endoscopic Technique Through Interlaminar Approach for L5/S1 Disk Herniations

Although minimally invasive full-endoscopic (FE) spine surgery through the interlaminar approach has proved safe and effective for surgical treatment of lumbar disk herniation, the learning curve of the procedure has not been sufficiently established. The purpose of this study is to determine the learning curve for the FE surgery through interlaminar approach for treating the L5/S1 disk herniation. Thirty-six patients with lumbar disk herniation (L5/S1 segment) who underwent FE lumbar discectomy through the interlaminar approach between March 2011 and March 2012 were equally divided into Group A, B, and C by the study time of the surgeons. Clinical evaluation data included perioperative parameters (operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, and the amount of intraoperative bone and ligament excision), clinical curative effect index [visual analog scale (VAS) score for leg and back pain], complications, and the rate of conversion to open surgery. The operation duration, intraoperative bleeding, and the amount of bone and ligament excision were gradually and significantly reduced in the Groups A, B, and C (P < 0.01) and reflected in steep curves of proficiency suggesting that the rate of learning was fast. The VAS scores of leg and back pain were significantly improved (P < 0.01) and no symptomatic recurrence was noticed during the follow-up period (1–1.5 years). The outcomes the three groups were not significantly different. The clinical outcomes of the minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of L5/S1 segment disk herniation through the interlaminar approach were excellent suggesting of a satisfactory curative effect. The steep learning curves of perioperative parameters plotted against the number of surgeries conducted suggest that proficiency can be reached reasonably fast.     

Finite Element Analysis of Minimal Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

The purpose of our study is to develop and validate three-dimensional finite element models of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, and explore the most appropriate method of fixation and fusion by comparing biomechanical characteristics of different fixation method. We developed four fusion models: bilateral pedicle screws fixation with a single cage insertion model (A), bilateral pedicle screws fixation with two cages insertion model (B), unilateral pedicle screws fixation with a single cage insertion model (C), and unilateral pedicle screws fixation with two cages insertion model (D); the models were subjected to different forces including anterior bending, posterior extension, left bending, right bending, rotation, and axial compressive. The von Mises stress of the fusion segments on the pedicle screw and cages was recorded. Angular variation and stress of pedicle screw and cage were compared. There were differences of Von Mises peak stress among four models, but were within the range of maximum force. The angular variation in A, B, C, and D decreased significantly compared with normal. There was no significant difference of angular variation between A and B, and C and D. Bilateral pedicle screws fixation had more superior biomechanics than unilateral pedicle screws fixation. In conclusion, the lumbar interbody fusion models were established using varying fixation methods, and the results verified that unilateral pedicle screws fixation with a single cage could meet the stability demand in minimal invasive transforaminal interbody fusion.     

骨水泥强化椎弓根螺钉联合椎间融合复位治疗老年重度腰椎滑脱的临床研究

摘要 目的：观察椎间融合复位联合骨水泥强化椎弓根螺钉治疗老年重度腰椎滑脱的临床效果。方法：回顾性分析我院于2016年3月~2019年3月期间收治的老年重度腰椎滑脱患者92例,根据治疗方案的不同可将患者分为A组（n=44）和B组（n=48）,A组给予椎弓根螺钉联合椎间融合复位治疗,B组给予骨水泥强化椎弓根螺钉联合椎间融合复位治疗,对比两组视觉疼痛模拟评分（VAS）、Oswestry功能障碍指数（ODI）及日本骨科协会（JOA）腰腿痛评分、临床指标、滑脱距离、滑脱率、椎间隙高度、椎间融合率、椎间孔高度、并发症及螺钉松动情况。结果：术后12个月,两组VAS、ODI、JOA评分均下降,且B组低于A组（P<0.05）。两组术中出血量对比组间无统计学差异（P>0.05）,B组手术时间长于A组,住院时间短于A组,椎间融合率高于A组（P<0.05）。术后12个月,两组滑脱距离、滑脱率均下降,且B组小于A组（P<0.05）。术后12个月,两组椎间隙高度、椎间孔高度均升高,且B组高于A组（P<0.05）。两组并发症发生率组间对比无差异（P>0.05）。结论：老年重度腰椎滑脱患者椎间融合复位联合骨水泥强化椎弓根螺钉治疗,虽一定程度上延长了手术时间,但可促进临床症状,改善椎间高度及腰椎滑脱程度,缩短住院时间,且不增加并发症发生率。     

经皮椎弓根空心螺钉微创椎体间融合治疗腰椎间盘突出的临床效果分析

目的：探究经皮椎弓根空心螺钉微创椎体间融合治疗腰椎间盘突出的临床效果及安全性。方法：病例来源于我院2009 年12 月~2013 年12 月收治的确诊为腰椎间盘突出症的病患174 例,依据随机数字表法将其均分为观察组与对照组,每组87 例。其 中,观察组施行Quadrant微创通道经皮椎弓根空心螺钉椎间融合术,对照组施行经后入路开放性椎间融合术。评估和比较两组病 患术前和随访结束时的视觉模拟评分系统(VAS)疼痛评分与Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)的变化及术后并发症的发生情况。结 果：观察组治疗前、出院时及随访一年时的VAS 评分与ODI指数与对照组比较差异均不显著(P>0.05)。观察组手术切口长度、术 后住院时间及术中出血量均明显优于对照组(P<0.01),而其手术所需时间明显长于对照组(P<0.01)。对照组患者术后出现20 例神 经根损伤(22.99%),3 例椎间隙感染(3.45%),其并发症总发生率为(26.44%),而观察组患者术后仅出现3 例神经根损伤,发生率为 3.45%,显著低于对照组(P<0.01)。结论：经皮椎弓根空心螺钉微创椎体间融合治疗的临床效果肯定,能减少对病患的创伤,控制术 后并发症的发生,具有较高的临床应用价值。     

微创单枚椎间融合器单边椎弓根螺钉内固定术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效观察

目的：比较微创单边椎弓根螺钉加单枚椎间融合器和双边椎弓根螺钉加椎间植骨融合术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效,探讨微创单边内固定的可行性。方法：选择2009年1月～2012年11月在我科行椎间盘切除椎体间融合内固定术治疗的腰椎间盘突出症患者共43例,其中微创单边内同定18例,平均随访15.8个月;双边内固定25例,平均随访16.3个月。对比分析两组患者的一般资料、手术时间、术中出血、住院天数、住院费用、疼痛视觉模拟评分（VAS）和日本骨科协会评估治疗（JOA）评分、植骨融合率及并发症的发生情况。结果：与单边内固定组比较,双边内固定处理的患者的手术时间明显缩短（P〈0.001）,术中失血量明显减少（P〈0.05）,平均住院费用明显降低（P〈0.05）。而两组之间的住院时间、随访时间、植骨融合率、并发症的发生率以及末次随访时的VAS和JOSA评分比较均无统计学差异（P〉0.05）。结论：单边内固定椎间融合治疗单间隙腰椎间盘突出症能够达到双边内固定同样的疗效,且具有手术时间短、出血量少、费用低等优点,但手术适应症需严格控制。     

后路减压椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折疗效分析

目的:探讨后路减压椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效。方法:本研究选取了90例胸腰椎骨折患者,按照入院时间顺序不同分为两组,前路组(46例)采取前路减压椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗,后路组(44例)采取后路减压椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗。观察并记录两组患者围手术期参数,术前术后下腰痛功能、神经功能恢复情况及随访12个月期间并发症发生情况,评价后路减压椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效。结果:后路组在术中失血量、手术时间、住院时间上均明显少于或短于前路组(P0.05);与术前相比,术后两组Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)值均明显降低(P0.05)。与术后同时间前路组相比,后路组ODI值均明显低于前路组(P0.05);与术前相比,术后12个月两组神经功能分级整体有所提高(P0.05),但两组间相比,差异没有统计学意义(P0.05);随访12个月期间,两组并发症发生率比较,差异没有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:采用后路椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折,手术时间短,疗效显著,术中出血量少,预后较好,有利于患者腰椎功能的恢复。     

皮质骨轨迹螺钉与椎弓根螺钉行经椎间孔入路椎间融合术的疗效比较

目的:探讨皮质骨轨迹螺钉(cortical bone trajectory,CBT)与椎弓根螺钉(pedicle screw,PS)行经椎间孔入路椎间融合术(transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,TLIF)治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床疗效。方法:选取2016年5月至2018年5月采用TLIF治疗的腰椎退行性疾病患者资料50例作为研究对象,其中行CBT螺钉固定组25例,行PS螺钉内固定组25例。分别记录患者一般资料、围手术期参数及并发症发生情况。腰痛VAS评分、腿痛VAS评分及ODI功能指数评分评估临床效果。Bridwell分级标准评价两组融合情况。结果:平均随访时间16.72±3.6个月。两组患者在性别、年龄、疾病诊断、手术节段方面组间差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。皮质骨轨迹螺钉组平均手术时间及术中出血量为171.88±25.75 min、225.20±51.57 m L,椎弓根螺钉组为221.24±33.53 min、297.60±66.40 m L,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组患者术后1月及末次随访腰痛VAS评分、腿痛VAS评分及ODI功能指数评分均较术前有明显改善,两组间差异无统计学意义。末次随访两组患者均取得骨性融合。结论:对于腰椎退行性疾病患者,采用CBT螺钉和PS螺钉内固定方式行TLIF均能到达良好的临床疗效及融合率,采用皮质骨轨迹螺钉行TLIF患者手术时间短,术中出血量更少。     

Novel Pedicle Screw and Plate System Provides Superior Stability in Unilateral Fixation for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An In Vitro Biomechanical Study

Purpose

This study aims to compare the biomechanical properties of the novel pedicle screw and plate system with the traditional rod system in asymmetrical posterior stabilization for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF). We compared the immediate stabilizing effects of fusion segment and the strain distribution on the vertebral body.

Methods

Seven fresh calf lumbar spines (L3-L6) were tested. Flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation were induced by pure moments of ± 5.0 Nm and the range of motion (ROM) was recorded. Strain gauges were instrumented at L4 and L5 vertebral body to record the strain distribution under flexion and lateral bending (LB). After intact kinematic analysis, a right sided TLIF was performed at L4-L5. Then each specimen was tested for the following constructs: unilateral pedicle screw and rod (UR); unilateral pedicle screw and plate (UP); UR and transfacet pedicle screw (TFS); UP and TFS; UP and UR.

Results

All instrumented constructs significantly reduced ROM in all motion compared with the intact specimen, except the UR construct in axial rotation. Unilateral fixation (UR or UP) reduced ROM less compared with the bilateral fixation (UP/UR+TFS, UP+UR). The plate system resulted in more reduction in ROM compared with the rod system, especially in axial rotation. UP construct provided more stability in axial rotation compared with UR construct. The strain distribution on the left and right side of L4 vertebral body was significantly different from UR and UR+TFS construct under flexion motion. The strain distribution on L4 vertebral body was significantly influenced by different fixation constructs.

Conclusions

The novel plate could provide sufficient segmental stability in axial rotation. The UR construct exhibits weak stability and asymmetrical strain distribution in fusion segment, while the UP construct is a good alternative choice for unilateral posterior fixation of MI-TLIF.     

A Meta-Analysis of Unilateral versus Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Study Design

Meta-analysis.

Background

Bilateral pedicle screw fixation (PS) after lumbar interbody fusion is a widely accepted method of managing various spinal diseases. Recently, unilateral PS fixation has been reported as effective as bilateral PS fixation. This meta-analysis aimed to comparatively assess the efficacy and safety of unilateral PS fixation and bilateral PS fixation in the minimally invasive (MIS) lumbar interbody fusion for one-level degenerative lumbar spine disease.

Methods

MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, BIOSIS Previews, and Cochrane Library were searched through March 30, 2014. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) on unilateral versus bilateral PS fixation in MIS lumbar interbody fusion that met the inclusion criteria and the methodological quality standard were retrieved and reviewed. Data on participant characteristics, interventions, follow-up period, and outcomes were extracted from the included studies and analyzed by Review Manager 5.2.

Results

Six studies (5 RCTs and 1 CCT) involving 298 patients were selected. There were no significant differences between unilateral and bilateral PS fixation procedures in fusion rate, complications, visual analogue score (VAS) for leg pain, VAS for back pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI). Both fixation procedures had similar length of hospital stay (MD = 0.38, 95% CI = −0.83 to 1.58; P = 0.54). In contrast, bilateral PS fixation was associated with significantly more intra-operative blood loss (P = 0.002) and significantly longer operation time (P = 0.02) as compared with unilateral PS fixation.

Conclusions

Unilateral PS fixation appears as effective and safe as bilateral PS fixation in MIS lumbar interbody fusion but requires less operative time and causes less blood loss, thus offering a simple alternative approach for one-level lumbar degenerative disease.     

椎旁肌退变与短节段腰椎融合内固定术后螺钉松动的相关性分析

摘要 目的：分析椎旁肌退变与短节段腰椎融合内固定术后螺钉松动的相关性。方法：回顾性分析2018年6月至2020年6月广州市番禺区中医院行短节段腰椎融合内固定术治疗的251例腰椎退行性疾病患者的临床资料，根据术后螺钉松动情况分为松动组（n=47）和对照组（n=204）。收集患者的临床资料，对比两组椎间植骨融合情况、螺钉直径、螺钉长度、螺钉椎内长度、椎旁肌的肌肉相对总横截面积（rtCSA）和脂肪浸润程度（FI）。应用多因素logistic回归分析短节段腰椎融合内固定术后螺钉松动发生的危险因素，并描绘受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线检验危险因素预测短节段腰椎融合内固定术后螺钉松动的效能。结果：251例患者平均随访时间（24.16±7.28）个月，其中47例患者在最终随访时发生螺钉松动，总体松动率18.73%。两组性别、骨密度比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。与对照组相比，松动组的多裂肌FI增高（P＜0.05）。与对照组相比，松动组的竖脊肌rtCSA减少，竖脊肌FI增高（P＜0.05）。多因素logistic回归分析显示竖脊肌FI较高是短节段腰椎融合内固定术后螺钉松动发生的独立危险因素，而竖脊肌rtCSA较高、骨密度较高则是保护因素（P＜0.05）。ROC曲线分析显示：骨密度、竖脊肌rtCSA、竖脊肌FI等3指标单独及联合应用时：ROC-AUC（0.95CI）分别为0.708（0.446～0.971）、0.736（0.495～0.951）、0.648（0.335～0.965）、0.842（0.719～0.957）。联合应用预测效能较高。结论：竖脊肌的退变是短节段腰椎融合内固定术后螺钉松动的危险因素。当骨密度＜-3.00 g/cm²、竖脊肌rtCSA＜1.45%及FI＞35.00%时，提示术后发生螺钉松动的可能性大，可作为短节段腰椎融合内固定术后评价螺钉松动风险的参考指标。     

Quadrant通道下MIS-TLIF与传统术式治疗单节段腰椎退变性疾病的疗效比较

目的:对比分析Quadrant通道下微创椎间孔椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)与传统开放经椎间孔椎间融合术(TLIF)治疗单节段腰椎退变性疾病的临床疗效和安全性。方法:选取2012年3月至2015年3月120例我院收治的120例单节段腰椎退变性疾病患者,并将其随机分为对照组和微创(MIS)组,每组各60例。对照组患者给予TLIF治疗,微创组给予MIS-TLIF治疗。观察和比较两组患者的手术情况,手术前后的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI),肌酸磷酸激酶(CPK)水平、椎间植骨融合率及并发症的发生情况。结果:微创组患者的切口长度、出血量、射线照射时间、下地活动时间以及住院时间均显著低于或短于对照组(P0.05);术后1周、6个月,微创组患者的VAS、ODI评分均显著低于对照组(P0.05);术后,两组患者的CPK水平出现剧烈上升,随后又逐渐下降,但同一时段微创组患者的CPK水平明显低于对照组(P0.05);微创组的椎骨性融合率为93.33%(56/60),显著低于对照组(85.00%,P0.05),且其神经损伤、硬膜囊破裂的发生率均显著低于对照组(P0.05),感染的发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:Quadrant通道下微创椎间孔椎间融合术治疗单节段腰椎退变性疾病的临床疗效明显优于传统开放经椎间孔椎间融合术,且创伤更小,患者康复更快,安全性更高。     

新型骨水泥椎弓根螺钉在治疗腰椎滑脱合并骨质疏松症的应用研究

目的:探讨评估聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(polymethvlmethacnrlat, PMMA)增强的具有"渐变孔"结构的侧开孔中空椎弓根螺钉(Fenestrated pedicle screw, FPS)治疗腰椎滑脱症的安全性及疗效。方法:回顾性分析2013年1月～2017年12月收治32例合并有骨质疏松症的腰椎滑脱患者,均应用具有"渐变孔"结构的FPS融合手术治疗,记录手术时长、术中出血量,住院时长;测量椎间隙高度、椎体楔形变指数、滑脱距离、滑脱角、骨盆指数、腰椎前凸角;随访评估Oswestry功能障碍指数问卷表(Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire, ODI)评分和视觉模拟评分法(Visual Analogue Score, VAS)评分,比较分析术前、术后及末次随访时的差异;结果:术中X线及术后三维CT检查发现3枚渗漏的骨水泥螺钉(2.2%),均为Yeom C型,术后无不适。随访7～61个月(平均34.9个月),滑脱复位良好,后凸畸形和矢状位失衡矫正良好,ODI评分和VAS评分均较术前有显著改善(p0.05)。随访期间,全部病例滑脱无复发,无椎弓根螺钉松动、断裂,无椎间隙塌陷,根据SUK标准融合成功率100%。结论:新型骨水泥螺钉能够提供良好的固定稳定性,并且能够避免骨水泥渗漏发生以及螺钉松动脱出,为骨质疏松脊柱手术提供一种新的选择。     

椎弓根螺钉用于植骨融合术治疗胸腰椎结核的临床研究

目的:探讨椎弓根内固定联合植骨融合术治疗胸腰椎结核的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析2013年5月至2014年5月在我院接受治疗的50例胸腰椎结核患者的临床资料,结合影像资料评价患者手术前后的红细胞沉降率、后凸畸形矫正情况、Frankel分级及术后并发症的发生情况等。结果:所有患者术后病理均证实为脊柱结核,术中27例植入大块自体髂骨,23例植入自体肋骨捆绑植骨。24例采用椎体侧前方钉棒内固定,26例采用后路椎弓根螺钉系统内固定。术中未出现脊髓、神经、血管损伤及血气胸等并发症。患者术后红细胞沉降率获得改善,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。术后Cobb角明显获得矫正,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。患者术后脊柱损伤程度明显改善,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:椎弓根内固定联合椎体间植骨融合术治疗胸腰椎结核具有良好的临床效果,不仅可以改善红细胞沉降率,而且可以矫正患者脊柱后凸畸形,值得临床推广应用。     

经椎弓根椎体内植骨联合短节段内固定治疗老年骨质疏松性脊柱骨折的临床疗效

目的:探讨使用椎弓根椎体内植骨联合短节段内固定法治疗老年骨质疏松性脊柱骨折的临床疗效。方法:将2013年2月至2013年10月入院的59例老年胸腰段脊柱骨折患者按照治疗方法分为两组:观察组27例,进行经椎弓根椎体内植骨联合短节段弓根钉棒系统内固定治疗;对照组32例,单纯进行短节段弓根钉棒系统内固定治疗。研究过程中对患者的术中失血量、手术所用时间、VAS、手术前后椎体高度、骨折愈合时间及住院时间等治疗进行记录,并对两组数据进行统计学分析。结果:观察组术后及末次随访椎体高度丢失明显低于对照组(4.31±2.867.13±4.41,4.72±3.9811.57±4.72,P0.05),术前Cobb角两组患者无差异,而术后及末次随访Cobb角观察组明显低于对照组(3.96±3.477.25±5.29,5.17±4.3311.21±6.29,P0.01),差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。术后疼痛程度评分显示,对照组高于观察组(5.68±2.371.86±1.41,P0.05),有显著性差异。观察组术后内固定物失效率也明显低于对照组(P0.05)。结论:临床调查结果显示,使用椎弓根椎体内植骨联合短节段内固定治疗老年骨质疏松性脊柱骨折可降低术后痛感,提高固定即时稳定性,值得临床推广使用。     

经皮微创椎弓根螺钉内固定与开放手术对胸腰椎骨折患者Cobb's 角 与椎体前缘高度恢复的影响

目的:比较经皮微创椎弓根螺钉内固定与开放手术治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效,并对其Cobb's角与椎体前缘高度的变化情况进行比较。方法:选择2011年1月-2013年10月我院收治的60例胸腰椎骨折患者并按照数字随机法分为两组,每组30例,对照组采取开放椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗,观察组经皮微创椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗,两组患者均随访24个月,比较两组患者手术一般情况及Cobb's角与椎体前缘高度恢复情况。结果:观察组手术切口长度、术中出血量及住院时间均短于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(均P0.05)。两组术后伤椎前缘高度及矢状位指数均大于术前(均P0.05),观察组术后伤椎前缘高度及矢状位指数均大于对照组(均P0.05);且两组术后后凸Cobb角小于术前(均P0.05),且观察组术后后凸Cobb角小于对照组(P0.05)。观察组术后并发症1例(3.3%),与对照组4例(13.3%)比较无显著统计学差异(均P0.05)。结论:经皮微创椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折疗效较佳,Cobb's角与椎体前缘高度恢复情况较优。