Evidence for an Additional Base-Pairing Element between the Telomeric Repeat and the Telomerase RNA Template in Kluyveromyces lactis and Other Yeasts

In all telomerases, the template region of the RNA subunit contains a region of telomere homology that is longer than the unit telomeric repeat. This allows a newly synthesized telomeric repeat to translocate back to the 3′ end of the template prior to a second round of telomeric repeat synthesis. In the yeast Kluyveromyces lactis, the telomerase RNA (Ter1) template has 30 nucleotides of perfect homology to the 25-bp telomeric repeat. Here we provide strong evidence that three additional nucleotides at positions −2 through −4 present on the 3′ side of the template form base-pairing interactions with telomeric DNA. Mutation of these bases can lead to opposite effects on telomere length depending on the sequence permutation of the template in a manner consistent with whether the mutation increases or decreases the base-pairing potential with the telomere. Additionally, mutations in the −2 and −3 positions that restore base-pairing potential can suppress corresponding sequence changes in the telomeric repeat. Finally, multiple other yeast species were found to also have telomerase RNAs that encode relatively long 7- to 10-nucleotide domains predicted to base pair, often with imperfect pairing, with telomeric DNA. We further demonstrate that K. lactis telomeric fragments produce banded patterns with a 25-bp periodicity. This indicates that K. lactis telomeres have preferred termination points within the 25-bp telomeric repeat.Telomeres are DNA and protein complexes present at the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes that function to protect chromosome ends from terminal sequence losses and fusions (3, 36). Telomeric DNA is typically composed of tandem 5- to 26-bp repeats that are sufficient for telomere function and that serve as binding sites for telomeric proteins (32). The ribonucleoprotein enzyme telomerase adds telomeric repeats to chromosome ends and prevents the gradual shortening that would otherwise occur. Telomerase synthesizes new telomeric repeats onto chromosome ends by using part of its RNA subunit as a template (13, 14, 31). Cells without telomerase encounter growth and viability problems once telomeres begin to become too short to properly function. In most human cells, telomerase activity is greatly reduced or absent and the ensuing telomere shortening functions to inhibit the formation of cancer by limiting the number of divisions that cells can undergo (4, 7, 16, 30).Recognition of a telomeric end by telomerase in vivo is complex and requires a number of different interactions between components of telomerase and components of the telomere (32). Specialized proteins that bind the 3′ single-stranded overhangs of telomeres, including the yeast Cdc13 protein, can interact directly with telomerase (9, 28). A critical aspect of telomerase''s interaction with the telomeres comes through base pairing between the telomeric overhang and the template region of the telomerase RNA. In all known telomerases, the template region of the RNA subunit contains a region of telomere homology that is longer than the unit telomeric repeat. This presence of short sequence identities at the 3′ and 5′ borders of the template allow a newly synthesized telomeric repeat to translocate back to the 3′ end of the template prior to a second round of telomeric repeat synthesis (38).Kluyveromyces lactis is an ascomycetous yeast species that is a valuable model organism for studying telomeres and telomerase. Unlike the better-studied yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe, K. lactis has telomeres composed of repeats of uniform size (25 bp) and sequence (24). This indicates that the translocation step during a round of DNA synthesis by the telomerase enzyme normally occurs between precise positions at the two ends of the telomerase RNA template region. Point mutations at any of multiple positions within either of the two 5-nucleotide (nt)-long direct repeats that border the telomerase RNA template result in telomeric repeats of abnormal size (35). These appear to result from disruption of the normal base-pairing interactions between template and telomeric DNA during the translocation step.Here we present genetic data that argue strongly that three additional nucleotides 3′ of the template and outside the region of continuous homology with the telomeric repeat are involved in the base pairing between telomeric DNA and the telomerase RNA template in K. lactis. Sequence data suggest that similar extended base-pairing regions are widespread in other yeast species.     

Sequential Loading of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku and Cdc13p to Telomeres

Ku is a heterodimeric protein involved in nonhomologous end-joining of the DNA double-stranded break repair pathway. It binds to the double-stranded DNA ends and then activates a series of repair enzymes that join the broken DNA. In addition to its function in DNA repair, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku (Yku) is also a component of telomere protein-DNA complexes that affect telomere function. The yeast telomeres are composed of duplex C_1–3(A/T)G_1–3 telomeric DNA repeats plus single-stranded TG_1–3 telomeric DNA tails. Here we show that Yku is capable of binding to a tailed-duplex DNA formed by telomeric DNA that mimics the structure of telomeres. Addition of Cdc13p, a single-stranded telomeric DNA-binding protein, to the Yku-DNA complex enables the formation of a ternary complex with Cdc13p binding to the single-stranded tail of the DNA substrate. Because pre-loading of Cdc13p to the single-stranded telomeric tail inhibits the binding of Yku, the results suggested that loading of Yku and Cdc13p to telomeres is sequential. Through generating a double-stranded break near telomeric DNA sequences, we found that Ku protein appears to bind to the de novo synthesized telomeres earlier than that of Cdc13p in vivo. Thus, our results indicated that Yku interacts directly with telomeres and that sequential loading of Yku followed by Cdc13p to telomeres is required for both proteins to form a ternary complex on telomeres. Our results also offer a mechanism that the binding of Cdc13p to telomeres might prevent Yku from initiating DNA double-stranded break repair pathway on telomeres.DNA damages in the form of double-stranded breaks (DSBs)⁴ compromise the integrity of genomes. Failure in repairing or mis-repairing double-stranded breaks can lead to chromosome instability and eventually cell death or cancer (1). Double-stranded breaks are repaired by two main pathways, the homologous recombination and nonhomologous DNA end-joining. In nonhomologous DNA end-joining, Ku is the first protein to bind to the DNA ends to initiate the repair pathway (2). Upon binding, Ku then recruits a series of repair enzymes to join the broken ends (2). Ku is a heterodimeric protein composed of 70- and ∼80-kDa subunits. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Ku includes Yku70 and Yku80 subunits. Because the biochemical configuration of the broken ends could be very diverse on DSBs, Ku binds to double-stranded ends in a sequence- and energy-independent manner. It is capable of binding to DNA ends with blunt 3′-overhangs or 5′-overhangs as well as double-stranded DNA with nicks, gaps, or internal loops (3–7). However, Ku does not have high affinity to single-stranded DNA. The crystal structure of human Ku heterodimer indicates that it forms a ring structure that encircles duplex DNA (7). This unique structure feature enables Ku to recognize DNA ends and achieves its high affinity binding.In additional to the role in double-stranded break repair, Ku was shown to be a component of telomeric protein-DNA complex in yeast and mammals (8–10). Telomeres are terminal structures of chromosomes composed of short tandem repeated sequences (11, 12). Mutation of YKU70 or YKU80 causes defects in telomere structure (13–15), telomere silencing (16–19), and replication timing of telomeres (20). The function of yeast Ku (Yku) on telomeres could mediate through protein-protein interaction with Sir4p or protein-RNA interaction with Tlc1 RNA (21, 22). For example, through the interaction with Sir4p, Yku selectively affects telomeres silencing but not the silent mating type loci (17). Yku could also bind to telomerase Tlc1 RNA for telomere length maintenance (22). Judged by the DNA binding activity of Yku, it is reasonable to suggest that it may bind directly to telomeric DNA. Indeed, it was shown that human Ku is capable of binding directly to telomeric DNA in vitro (15). Moreover, because the deletion of SIR4 in budding yeast (23) or Taz1 in fission yeast (24) does not abolish the association of Ku with chromosomal ends, this suggests that Ku might bind directly to telomeric DNA in cells. However, because yeast telomeres have a short 12–14-mer single-stranded tail (25), it is uncertain whether Yku could pass the single-stranded region to reach its binding site. The direct binding of Yku to telomeric DNA has not been experimentally determined.In contrast to double-stranded breaks, the ends of linear chromosomes are not recognized by repair enzymes as DNA damage. In S. cerevisiae, Cdc13p is the single-stranded TG_1–3 DNA-binding protein that enables cells to differentiate whether the ends of a linear DNA are telomeres or broken ends (26–29). Thus, although the mechanism of how cells prevent the activation of DSB repair pathway in telomere is unclear, it is likely that binding of Cdc13p to telomeres might inhibit the initiation of DNA damage response by the Ku protein. Here, using a tailed-duplex DNA synthesized by telomeric DNA sequences to mimic telomere structure, we showed that Yku binds directly to this tailed-duplex DNA substrate and forms a ternary complex with Cdc13p. Our results also showed that Yku loaded to a de novo synthesized telomere earlier than Cdc13p in vivo. These results support the direct binding of Yku to telomeric DNA and that the spatial orientation of Cdc13p might block the activation of DSB repair pathway on telomeres.     

Telomere higher-order structure and genomic instability

Telomeres, nucleoprotein complexes at the end of eukaryotic chromosomes, have vital roles in chromosome integrity. Telomere chromatin structure is both intricate and dynamic allowing for a variety of responses to several stimuli. A critical determinant in telomere structure is the G-strand overhang. Facilitated by telomeric proteins, the G-strand overhang stabilizes telomere higher-order assemblies most likely by adopting unusual DNA structures. These structures influence activities that occur at the chromosome end. Dysfunctional telomeres induce signals resulting in cell growth arrest or death. To overcome telomere dysfunction, cancer cells activate the DNA polymerase, telomerase. The presence of telomerase at the telomere may establish a particular telomeric state. If the chromosome ends of cancer and normal cells exist in different states, cancer-specific telomere structures would offer a unique chemotherapeutic target.     

Repair of DNA broken ends is similar in embryonic fibroblasts with and without telomerase

Telomeres cap the ends of chromosomes, preventing end-to-end fusions and subsequent chromosome instability. Here we used a telomerase knockout model to investigate whether telomerase participates in the processes of DNA break repair by de novo synthesis of telomere repeats at broken chromosome ends (chromosome healing). Chromosome healing giving rise to new detectable telomeric signals has not been observed in embryonic fibroblasts of telomerase-proficient mice exposed to ionizing radiation. Since the synthesis of telomeric sequences to broken DNA ends would make them refractory to rejoining events, the efficiency of rejoining of broken chromosomes in cell environments with and without telomerase has also been investigated. We conclude that the efficiency of rejoining broken chromosomes is not significantly different in the two cell environments. All together, our results indicate that there is no significant involvement of telomerase in the healing of broken DNA ends by synthesizing new telomeres in mouse embryo fibroblasts after exposure to ionizing radiation.     

ERCC1/XPF Protects Short Telomeres from Homologous Recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana

Many repair and recombination proteins play essential roles in telomere function and chromosome stability, notwithstanding the role of telomeres in “hiding” chromosome ends from DNA repair and recombination. Among these are XPF and ERCC1, which form a structure-specific endonuclease known for its essential role in nucleotide excision repair and is the subject of considerable interest in studies of recombination. In contrast to observations in mammalian cells, we observe no enhancement of chromosomal instability in Arabidopsis plants mutated for either XPF (AtRAD1) or ERCC1 (AtERCC1) orthologs, which develop normally and show wild-type telomere length. However, in the absence of telomerase, mutation of either of these two genes induces a significantly earlier onset of chromosomal instability. This early appearance of telomere instability is not due to a general acceleration of telomeric repeat loss, but is associated with the presence of dicentric chromosome bridges and cytologically visible extrachromosomal DNA fragments in mitotic anaphase. Such extrachromosomal fragments are not observed in later-generation single-telomerase mutant plants presenting similar frequencies of anaphase bridges. Extensive FISH analyses show that these DNAs are broken chromosomes and correspond to two specific chromosome arms. Analysis of the Arabidopsis genome sequence identified two extensive blocks of degenerate telomeric repeats, which lie at the bases of these two arms. Our data thus indicate a protective role of ERCC1/XPF against 3′ G-strand overhang invasion of interstitial telomeric repeats. The fact that the Atercc1 (and Atrad1) mutants dramatically potentiate levels of chromosome instability in Attert mutants, and the absence of such events in the presence of telomerase, have important implications for models of the roles of recombination at telomeres and is a striking illustration of the impact of genome structure on the outcomes of equivalent recombination processes in different organisms.     

The opposite roles of telomerase during initiation and progression of cancers

Telomeres are nucleoprotein complexes that cap the end of eukaryotic chromosomes. They are essential for the functions and the stability of the genomes. In the absence of telomerase, the enzyme that adds telomeric DNA repeats to chromosome ends, telomeres shorten with cell division, a process thought to contribute to cell senescence. Reciprocally, telomere stabilization in immortalized cells, that usually appears concomitant with detection of telomerase activity, suggests that telomerase is essential for unlimited cell proliferation. Sequential modifications in the function of telomeres play antagonistic functions as far as tumorigenesis is concerned. Telomere dysfunction is thought to promote genome instability at initial stages, favoring the emergence of cancer-associated chromosomal abnormalities; reestablishment of telomere maintenance is expected afterwards if efficient cell cycling is to occur.     

Revealing Novel Telomere Proteins Using in Vivo Cross-linking,Tandem Affinity Purification,and Label-free Quantitative LC-FTICR-MS

Telomeres are DNA-protein structures that protect chromosome ends from the actions of the DNA repair machinery. When telomeric integrity is compromised, genomic instability ensues. Considerable effort has focused on identification of telomere-binding proteins and elucidation of their functions. To date, protein identification has relied on classical immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometric approaches, primarily under conditions that favor isolation of proteins with strong or long lived interactions that are present at sufficient quantities to visualize by SDS-PAGE. To facilitate identification of low abundance and transiently associated telomere-binding proteins, we developed a novel approach that combines in vivo protein-protein cross-linking, tandem affinity purification, and stringent sequential endoprotease digestion. Peptides were identified by label-free comparative nano-LC-FTICR-MS. Here, we expressed an epitope-tagged telomere-binding protein and utilized a modified chromatin immunoprecipitation approach to cross-link associated proteins. The resulting immunoprecipitant contained telomeric DNA, establishing that this approach captures bona fide telomere binding complexes. To identify proteins present in the immunocaptured complexes, samples were reduced, alkylated, and digested with sequential endoprotease treatment. The resulting peptides were purified using a microscale porous graphite stationary phase and analyzed using nano-LC-FTICR-MS. Proteins enriched in cells expressing HA-FLAG-TIN2 were identified by label-free quantitative analysis of the FTICR mass spectra from different samples and ion trap tandem mass spectrometry followed by database searching. We identified all of the proteins that constitute the telomeric shelterin complex, thus validating the robustness of this approach. We also identified 62 novel telomere-binding proteins. These results demonstrate that DNA-bound protein complexes, including those present at low molar ratios, can be identified by this approach. The success of this approach will allow us to create a more complete understanding of telomere maintenance and have broad applicability.Numerous redundant systems exist to maintain the genome and ensure proper segregation of genetic material upon cellular division. Elucidation of the molecular mechanisms that constitute these systems is an area of intense inquiry. In model systems, elegant genetic approaches have been used extensively to identify proteins and interrogate their role in these mechanisms. Unfortunately, mammalian systems are refractory to similar approaches, and thus protein identification has relied heavily on homology searches and mass spectrometry. For this reason, the development of isolation procedures and refined mass spectrometric approaches capable of identifying proteins within large protein complexes, including those present as transient interactors and in substoichiometric quantities, is an important area of research. Previous studies have successfully utilized quantitative proteomics with stable isotopic peptide labeling to identify specific components of cellular macromolecular complexes by affinity purification (1–6). More recently, high resolution mass spectrometry with label-free quantification has been shown to improve and extend quantitative proteomics toward comprehensive analysis of protein complexes (7).Telomeres are DNA-protein structures located at the ends of linear eukaryotic chromosomes (see Fig. 1). The DNA portion of telomeres consists of a double-stranded region and a single-stranded 3′ overhang, both composed of repetitive non-coding G-rich sequences (TTAGGG). In addition to the DNA component, proteins bind the telomere and contribute to its stability. Six core proteins (TRF1, TRF2, POT1, TIN2, RAP1, and ACD/TPP1), collectively known as the shelterin (or telosome) complex, are constitutively present at the telomere (for reviews, see Refs. 8 and 9). Together, the telomeric DNA and shelterin complex maintain a “capped” or functional telomere that protects the end of the chromosome by distinguishing it from a bona fide double strand DNA break (10). When telomeres become uncapped or “dysfunctional,” they no longer carry out this protective function, rendering the chromosome ends susceptible to DNA repair enzymes. In the absence of functional checkpoints, uncapped telomeres can lead to end-to-end fusions that drive genomic instability, a hallmark of human cancer (11).Open in a separate windowFig. 1.Fluorescent in situ hybridization reveals presence of telomeres at termini of human chromosomes. Top panel, representative metaphase spread from human cells. FISH analysis reveals the presence of telomeres (red) and centromeres (green), and chromosomal DNA (blue) was detected by DAPI staining. Bottom panel, schematic drawing of a telomere loop (T-Loop) showing the shelterin core complex (TRF1, TRF2, POT1, TIN2, RAP1, and TPP1) as well as a subset of known telomere-binding proteins (in gray). Question marks indicate that more telomere-binding proteins remain to be identified. WRN, Werner, BLM, Bloom, and XPF, xeroderma pigmentosum type F.Recent work has revealed that in addition to the shelterin complex a growing list of proteins associate with the telomere and play essential roles in telomere maintenance (a subset of these proteins, colored in gray, is depicted in Fig. 1). Paradoxically, many of these proteins play roles in DNA repair and recombination. These proteins include the MRE11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex involved in recombinational repair (12); Ku70 and Ku80, which are members of the non-homologous end joining complex (13); the ERCC1/XPF nucleotide excision repair endonuclease (14); and the ataxia telagiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase (12, 15). Additional proteins have been found at the telomere in low stoichiometric ratios, including telomerase, which binds the telomere during S phase and adds telomeric repeats to the ends of the chromosomes (16, 17). The Werner helicase is also present at the telomeres during S phase where it plays an important role in lagging strand DNA replication (18). Despite the plethora of proteins known to bind to the telomere, many proteins that act in a transient manner and/or are present in substoichiometric quantities remain to be identified.To identify novel telomere-binding proteins, we developed a method that involves chemical cross-linking of protein complexes in live cells to capture transient interactions followed by affinity purification of the cross-linked telomere complex with an epitope-tagged telomeric protein, TIN2. Using the affinity-captured protein preparations, we optimized cross-link reversal, sequential endoprotease digestion, and microscale solid phase peptide purification. The peptide pools were analyzed using nano-LC-FTICR-MS. Comparative quantitative analysis of affinity-purified proteins from cells overexpressing the epitope-tagged TIN2 and control cells was performed using the peptide ion currents at accurate m/z values from the aligned LC-MS chromatograms across multiple samples. The proteins were identified using tandem MS with spectral matching against protein databases. Using this approach, we identified the six members of the shelterin complex and other proteins previously reported to bind to the telomere. We also identified a novel group of candidate telomere-binding proteins that were significantly enriched in samples expressing epitope-tagged TIN2 (HA¹-FLAG-TIN2) compared with non-expressing control cells. Importantly, the presence of telomeric DNA in our immunoprecipitants from cells expressing HA-FLAG-TIN2 but not in control cells demonstrates that it is possible to identify proteins bound to DNA by utilizing a protein-protein cross-linking reagent. This strategy will prove versatile for the identification of other proteins found in large protein complexes as well as bound to DNA.     

Developmentally regulated initiation of DNA synthesis by telomerase: evidence for factor-assisted de novo telomere formation.

Telomerase serves a dual role at telomeres, maintaining tracts of telomere repeats and forming telomeres de novo on broken chromosomes in a process called chromosome healing. In ciliates, both mechanisms are readily observed. Vegetatively growing cells maintain pre-existing telomeres, while cells undergoing macronuclear development fragment their chromosomes and form telomeres de novo. Here we provide the first evidence for developmentally regulated initiation of DNA synthesis by telomerase. In vitro assays were conducted with telomerase from vegetative and developing Euplotes macronuclei using chimeric primers that contained non-telomeric 3' ends and an upstream stretch of telomeric DNA. In developing macronuclei, chimeric primers had two fates: nucleotides were either polymerized directly onto the 3' terminus or residues were removed from the 3' end by endonucleolytic cleavage before polymerization began. In contrast, telomerase from vegetative macronuclei used only the cleavage pathway. Telomere repeat addition onto non-telomeric 3' ends was lost when developing macronuclei were lysed and the contents purified on glycerol gradients. However, when fractions from the glycerol gradient were added back to partially purified telomerase, telomere synthesis was restored. The data indicate that a dissociable chromosome healing factor (CHF) collaborates with telomerase to initiate developmentally programmed de novo telomere formation.     

Developmentally programmed healing of chromosomes by telomerase in Tetrahymena

Healing of a broken chromosome and in eukaryotes involves acquisition of a telomere. During macronuclear development in ciliated protozoans, germline chromosomes are fragmented into linear subchromosomes, whose ends are healed by de novo addition of telomeres. We showed previously that the ribonucleoprotein enzyme telomerase elongates preexisting telomeres by synthesizing one telomeric DNA strand, using a template sequence in the RNA moiety of the enzyme. By marking telomerase with a mutation in the telomerase RNA template, which causes synthesis of novel telomeric sequences, we now show that in the ciliate Tetrahymena, telomerase directly adds telomeric DNA onto nontelomeric sequences during developmentally controlled chromosome healing. Unexpectedly, one telomerase RNA template mutation converted telomerase from an enzyme that normally synthesizes precisely templated sequences to a less precise polymerase that sometimes synthesizes irregular telomeric repeats in vivo.     

Manipulating mouse telomeres: models of tumorigenesis and aging

Telomeres are capping structures at the ends of chromosomes, composed of a repetitive DNA sequence and associated proteins. Both a minimal length of telomeric repeats and telomere-associated binding proteins are necessary for proper telomere function. Functional telomeres are essential for maintaining the integrity and stability of eukaryotic genomes. The capping structure enables cells to distinguish chromosome ends from double strand breaks (DSBs) in the genome. Uncapped chromosome ends are at great risk for degradation, recombination, or chromosome fusion by cellular DNA repair systems. Dysfunctional telomeres have been proposed to contribute to tumorigenesis and some aging phenotypes. The analysis of mice deficient in telomerase activity and other telomere-associated proteins has allowed the roles of dysfunctional telomeres in tumorigenesis and aging to be directly tested. Here we will focus on the analysis of different mouse models disrupted for proteins that are important for telomere functions and discuss known and proposed consequences of telomere dysfunction in tumorigenesis and aging.     

Protection of Telomeres 1 Is Required for Telomere Integrity in the Moss Physcomitrella patens

In vertebrates, the single-stranded telomeric DNA binding protein Protection of Telomeres 1 (POT1) shields chromosome ends and prevents them from eliciting a DNA damage response. By contrast, Arabidopsis thaliana encodes two divergent full-length POT1 paralogs that do not exhibit telomeric DNA binding in vitro and have evolved to mediate telomerase regulation instead of chromosome end protection. To further investigate the role of POT1 in plants, we established the moss Physcomitrella patens as a new model for telomere biology and a counterpoint to Arabidopsis. The sequence and architecture of the telomere tract is similar in P. patens and Arabidopsis, but P. patens harbors only a single-copy POT1 gene. Unlike At POT1 proteins, Pp POT1 efficiently bound single-stranded telomeric DNA in vitro. Deletion of the P. patens POT1 gene resulted in the rapid onset of severe developmental defects and sterility. Although telomerase activity levels were unperturbed, telomeres were substantially shortened, harbored extended G-overhangs, and engaged in end-to-end fusions. We conclude that the telomere capping function of POT1 is conserved in early diverging land plants but is subsequently lost in Arabidopsis.     

Give me a break: How telomeres suppress the DNA damage response

Linear organization of the genome requires mechanisms to protect and replicate chromosome ends. To this end eukaryotic cells evolved telomeres, specialized nucleoproteic complexes, and telomerase, the enzyme that maintains the telomeric DNA. Telomeres allow cells to distinguish chromosome ends from sites of DNA damage. In mammalian cells this is accomplished by a protein complex, termed shelterin, that binds to telomeric DNA and is able to shield chromosome ends from the DNA damage machinery. In recent years, we have seen major advances in our understanding of how this protein complex works due to the generation of mouse models carrying mutations of individual shelterin components. This review will focus on our current understanding of how the shelterin complex is able to suppress the DNA damage response pathways, and on the cellular and organismal outcomes of telomere dysfunction.