Analysis of Free Energy Signals Arising from Nucleotide Hybridization Between rRNA and mRNA Sequences during Translation in Eubacteria

A decoding algorithm is tested that mechanistically models the progressive alignments that arise as the mRNA moves past the rRNA tail during translation elongation. Each of these alignments provides an opportunity for hybridization between the single-stranded, -terminal nucleotides of the 16S rRNA and the spatially accessible window of mRNA sequence, from which a free energy value can be calculated. Using this algorithm we show that a periodic, energetic pattern of frequency 1/3 is revealed. This periodic signal exists in the majority of coding regions of eubacterial genes, but not in the non-coding regions encoding the 16S and 23S rRNAs. Signal analysis reveals that the population of coding regions of each bacterial species has a mean phase that is correlated in a statistically significant way with species () content. These results suggest that the periodic signal could function as a synchronization signal for the maintenance of reading frame and that codon usage provides a mechanism for manipulation of signal phase.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]     

Algorithms for Finding Small Attractors in Boolean Networks

A Boolean network is a model used to study the interactions between different genes in genetic regulatory networks. In this paper, we present several algorithms using gene ordering and feedback vertex sets to identify singleton attractors and small attractors in Boolean networks. We analyze the average case time complexities of some of the proposed algorithms. For instance, it is shown that the outdegree-based ordering algorithm for finding singleton attractors works in time for , which is much faster than the naive time algorithm, where is the number of genes and is the maximum indegree. We performed extensive computational experiments on these algorithms, which resulted in good agreement with theoretical results. In contrast, we give a simple and complete proof for showing that finding an attractor with the shortest period is NP-hard.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]     

Infection of Glial Cells by the Human Polyomavirus JC Is Mediated by an N-Linked Glycoprotein Containing Terminal α(2-6)-Linked Sialic Acids

The human JC polyomavirus (JCV) is the etiologic agent of the fatal central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating disease progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). PML typically occurs in immunosuppressed patients and is the direct result of JCV infection of oligodendrocytes. The initial event in infection of cells by JCV is attachment of the virus to receptors present on the surface of a susceptible cell. Our laboratory has been studying this critical event in the life cycle of JCV, and we have found that JCV binds to a limited number of cell surface receptors on human glial cells that are not shared by the related polyomavirus simian virus 40 (C. K. Liu, A. P. Hope, and W. J. Atwood, J. Neurovirol. 4:49–58, 1998). To further characterize specific JCV receptors on human glial cells, we tested specific neuraminidases, proteases, and phospholipases for the ability to inhibit JCV binding to and infection of glial cells. Several of the enzymes tested were capable of inhibiting virus binding to cells, but only neuraminidase was capable of inhibiting infection. The ability of neuraminidase to inhibit infection correlated with its ability to remove both α(2-3)- and α(2-6)-linked sialic acids from glial cells. A recombinant neuraminidase that specifically removes the α(2-3) linkage of sialic acid had no effect on virus binding or infection. A competition assay between virus and sialic acid-specific lectins that recognize either the α(2-3) or the α(2-6) linkage revealed that JCV preferentially interacts with α(2-6)-linked sialic acids on glial cells. Treatment of glial cells with tunicamycin, but not with benzyl N-acetyl-α-d-galactosaminide, inhibited infection by JCV, indicating that the sialylated JCV receptor is an N-linked glycoprotein. As sialic acid containing glycoproteins play a fundamental role in mediating many virus-cell and cell-cell recognition processes, it will be of interest to determine what role these receptors play in the pathogenesis of PML.Approximately 70% of the human population worldwide is seropositive for JC virus (JCV). Like other polyomaviruses, JCV establishes a lifelong latent or persistent infection in its natural host (40, 49, 50, 68, 72). Reactivation of JCV in the setting of an underlying immunosuppressive illness, such as AIDS, is thought to lead to virus dissemination to the central nervous system (CNS) and subsequent infection of oligodendrocytes (37, 40, 66, 68). Reactivation of latent JCV genomes already present in the CNS has also been postulated to contribute to the development of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) following immunosuppression (19, 48, 55, 70, 75). Approximately 4 to 6% of AIDS patients will develop PML during the course of their illness (10). In the CNS, JCV specifically infects oligodendrocytes and astrocytes. Outside the CNS, JCV genomes have been identified in the urogenital system, in the lymphoid system, and in B lymphocytes (2, 17, 18, 30, 47, 59). In vitro, JCV infects human glial cells and, to a limited extent, human B lymphocytes (3, 4, 39, 41, 42). Recently, JCV infection of tonsillar stromal cells and CD34⁺ B-cell precursors has been described (47). These observations have led to the suggestion that JCV may persist in a lymphoid compartment and that B cells may play a role in trafficking of JCV to the CNS (4, 30, 47).Virus-receptor interactions play a major role in determining virus tropism and tissue-specific pathology associated with virus infection. Viruses that have a very narrow host range and tissue tropism, such as JCV, are often shown to interact with high affinity to a limited number of specific receptors present on susceptible cells (26, 44). In some instances, virus tropism is strictly determined by the presence of specific receptors that mediate binding and entry (7, 16, 27, 35, 46, 53, 56, 67, 73, 74, 76). In other instances, however, successful entry into a cell is necessary but not sufficient for virus growth (5, 8, 45, 57). In these cases, additional permissive factors that interact with viral regulatory elements are required.The receptor binding characteristics of several polyomaviruses have been described. The mouse polyomavirus (PyV) receptor is an N-linked glycoprotein containing terminal α(2-3)-linked sialic acid (12–14, 22, 28). Both the large and small plaque strains of PyV recognize α(2-3)-linked sialic acid. The small-plaque strain also recognizes a branched disialyl structure containing α(2-3)- and α(2-6)-linked sialic acids. Neither strain recognizes straight-chain α(2-6)-linked sialic acid. The ability of the large- and small-plaque strains of PyV to differentially recognize these sialic acid structures has been precisely mapped to a single amino acid in the major virus capsid protein VP1 (21). The large-plaque strains all contain a glycine at amino acid position 92 in VP1, and the small-plaque strains all contain a negatively charged glutamic acid at this position (21). In addition to forming small or large plaques, these strains also differ in the ability to induce tumors in mice (20). This finding suggests that receptor recognition plays an important role in the pathogenesis of PyV.The cell surface receptor for lymphotropic papovavirus (LPV) is an O-linked glycoprotein containing terminal α(2-6)-linked sialic acid (26, 33, 34). Infection with LPV is restricted to a subset of human B-cell lines, and recognition of specific receptors is a major determinant of the tropism of LPV for these cells (26).Unlike the other members of the polyomavirus family, infection of cells by simian virus 40 (SV40) is independent of cell surface sialic acids. Instead, SV40 infection is mediated by major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-encoded class I proteins (5, 11). MHC class I proteins also play a role in mediating the association of SV40 with caveolae, a prerequisite for successful targeting of the SV40 genome to the nucleus of a cell (1, 63). Not surprisingly, SV40 has been shown not to compete with the sialic acid-dependent polyomaviruses for binding to host cells (15, 26, 38, 58).Very little is known about the early steps of JCV binding to and infection of glial cells. Like other members of the polyomavirus family, JCV is known to interact with cell surface sialic acids (51, 52). A role for sialic acids in mediating infection of glial cells has not been described. It is also not known whether the sialic acid is linked to a glycoprotein or a glycolipid. In a previous report, we demonstrated that JCV bound to a limited number of cell surface receptors on SVG cells that were not shared by the related polyomavirus SV40 (38). In this report, we demonstrate that virus binding to and infection of SVG cells is dependent on an N-linked glycoprotein containing terminal α(2-3)- and α(2-6)-linked sialic acids. Competitive binding assays with sialic acid-specific lectins suggest that the virus preferentially interacts with α(2-6)-linked sialic acids. We are currently evaluating the role of this receptor in determining the tropism of JCV for glial cells and B cells.     

Hinge-Region O-Glycosylation of Human Immunoglobulin G3 (IgG3)

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) is one of the most abundant proteins present in human serum and a fundamental component of the immune system. IgG3 represents ∼8% of the total amount of IgG in human serum and stands out from the other IgG subclasses because of its elongated hinge region and enhanced effector functions. This study reports partial O-glycosylation of the IgG3 hinge region, observed with nanoLC-ESI-IT-MS(/MS) analysis after proteolytic digestion. The repeat regions within the IgG3 hinge were found to be in part O-glycosylated at the threonine in the triple repeat motif. Non-, mono- and disialylated core 1-type O-glycans were detected in various IgG3 samples, both poly- and monoclonal. NanoLC-ESI-IT-MS/MS with electron transfer dissociation fragmentation and CE-MS/MS with CID fragmentation were used to determine the site of IgG3 O-glycosylation. The O-glycosylation site was further confirmed by the recombinant production of mutant IgG3 in which potential O-glycosylation sites had been knocked out.For IgG3 samples from six donors we found similar O-glycan structures and site occupancies, whereas for the same samples the conserved N-glycosylation of the Fc CH2 domain showed considerable interindividual variation. The occupancy of each of the three O-glycosylation sites was found to be ∼10% in six serum-derived IgG3 samples and ∼13% in two monoclonal IgG3 allotypes.Immunoglobulin G (IgG) is one of the most abundant proteins present in human serum and represents approximately three-quarters of the total serum immunoglobulin content (1). As the main mediator of humoral immunity and an important link between the adaptive and innate immune system, IgG is a fundamental component of the immune system. IgG consists of two heavy and light chains, linked by disulfide bonds. The protein can be subdivided into the antigen-binding (Fab) and the receptor-binding (Fc) region. There are four subclasses of IgG, all of which share an overall structure homology but differ slightly in their amino acid sequence; the quantity of the subclasses in human serum is as follows: IgG1 > 2 > 3 > 4 (2).IgG3 represents ∼8% of the total amount of IgG in human serum (2), and stands out from the other IgG subclasses for a number of reasons. First of all, IgG3 contains an elongated hinge region with up to a triple repeat sequence (the actual number ranging from one to three depending on the allotype (3)), which is responsible for the increased flexibility between the Fab and the Fc part, as well as the wider and more flexible angle between the two Fab arms (4, 5). This flexibility is likely the cause of the increased affinity of IgG3, compared with the other subclasses, for divalent binding to certain types of antigens (4, 6, 7). Second, IgG3 has a higher affinity for C1q, which initiates the classical complement pathway (5, 8). The interaction between IgG3 and C1q is not due to the elongated hinge region, as demonstrated by studies showing that recombinant IgG3 with an IgG1- or IgG4-like hinge sequence exhibited even greater binding affinity for C1q than wild-type IgG3 (8–10). Third, IgG3 has a higher overall affinity for the Fcγ receptors (FcγRs), through which it can influence effector cells of the innate immune system (11). The CH2 domain and hinge region of IgG3 were shown to be instrumental in binding to the high affinity FcγRI receptor (12). Finally, IgG3 generally has a shorter half-life compared with the other IgG subclasses (1 versus 3 weeks) (2). This difference was traced back to an H435R mutation that confers a positive charge at physiological pH, resulting in a decreased binding to the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), which is involved in recycling IgG targeted for lysosomal degradation (13). The low-efficiency FcRn-mediated transport also gives rise to decreased levels of IgG3 in mucosal tissue and impaired transport of IgG3 across the placenta (14). These properties do not hold true for all types of IgG3 since a large number of IgG3 allotypes have been described, some of which lack the H435R substitution and have a half-life and placental transport rates similar to IgG1 (13–16). IgG3 is more polymorphic than the other IgG subclasses, as evidenced by the high number of known allotypes (16). Most of the polymorphisms reside in the CH2 or CH3 domain, but the length of the hinge region can also display a high degree of variation. Depending on the number of sequence repeats, the hinge region can vary from 27 to 83 amino acid residues between different IgG3 allotypes (3, 16, 17).An N-linked complex type glycan is highly conserved and found in the CH2 domain of all IgG subclasses and allotypes. The type of glycan present at this site has been shown to influence the effector functions of IgG (18). N-glycans that lack a core fucose cause IgG to have an enhanced proinflammatory capacity through stronger binding to FcγRIIIa and FcγRIIIb (18–20). In contrast, IgG carrying sialylated N-glycans exhibits anti-inflammatory properties, likely due to increased binding affinity to C-type lectins and/or reduced binding to FcγR (18, 21, 22).O-linked glycosylation has been reported for various immunoglobulins. O-glycans are present on the hinge region of human IgA1 and IgD and mouse IgG2b (23–25). IgA1 contains nine potential sites for O-glycosylation (serine and threonine) in the hinge region, of which 3–5 are occupied, while IgD has been reported to carry between four and seven O-glycans (24–26). The O-glycosylation in the hinge of murine IgG2b was observed to protect against proteolytic digestion (23). Likewise, IgA1 was found to be more susceptible to degradation by Streptococci proteases after neuraminidase treatment (27).In this study, we report partial O-glycosylation of the human IgG3 hinge. We obtained both poly- and monoclonal IgG3 from various sources and performed proteolytic digestion with trypsin or proteinase K. NanoLC-reverse phase (RP)-ESI-ion trap (IT)-MS/MS was used to examine the resulting (glyco)peptides, revealing core 1-type O-glycans on multiple sites within the IgG3 hinge region.     

Enhanced Virus Clearance by Early Inducible Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus-Neutralizing Antibodies in Immunoglobulin-Transgenic Mice

Following infection of mice with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV), virus-neutralizing antibodies appear late, after 30 to 60 days. Such neutralizing antibodies play an important role in protection against reinfection. To analyze whether a neutralizing antibody response which developed earlier could contribute to LCMV clearance during the acute phase of infection, we generated transgenic mice expressing LCMV-neutralizing antibodies. Transgenic mice expressing the immunoglobulin μ heavy chain of the LCMV-neutralizing monoclonal antibody KL25 (H25 transgenic mice) mounted LCMV-neutralizing immunoglobulin M (IgM) serum titers within 8 days after infection. This early inducible LCMV-neutralizing antibody response significantly improved the host’s capacity to clear the infection and did not cause an enhancement of disease after intracerebral (i.c.) LCMV infection. In contrast, mice which had been passively administered LCMV-neutralizing antibodies and transgenic mice exhibiting spontaneous LCMV-neutralizing IgM serum titers (HL25 transgenic mice expressing the immunoglobulin μ heavy and the κ light chain) showed an enhancement of disease after i.c. LCMV infection. Thus, early-inducible LCMV-neutralizing antibodies can contribute to viral clearance in the acute phase of the infection and do not cause antibody-dependent enhancement of disease.Against many cytopathic viruses such as poliovirus, influenza virus, rabies virus, and vesicular stomatitis virus, protective virus-neutralizing antibodies are generated early, within 1 week after infection (3, 31, 36, 44, 49). In contrast, several noncytopathic viruses (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis viruses B and C in humans or lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus [LCMV] in mice) elicit poor and delayed virus-neutralizing antibody responses (1, 7, 20, 24, 27, 35, 45, 48).In the mouse, the natural host of LCMV, the acute LCMV infection is predominantly controlled by cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) in an obligatory perforin-dependent manner (13, 18, 28, 50). In addition to the CTL response, LCMV-specific antibodies are generated. Early after infection (by day 8), a strong antibody response specific for the internal viral nucleoprotein (NP) is mounted (7, 19, 23, 28). These early LCMV NP-specific antibodies exhibit no virus-neutralizing capacity (7, 10). Results from studies of B-cell-depleted mice and B-cell-deficient mice implied that the early LCMV NP-specific antibodies are not involved in the clearance of LCMV (8, 11, 12, 40). Late after infection (between days 30 and day 60), LCMV-neutralizing antibodies develop (7, 19, 22, 28, 33); these antibodies are directed against the surface glycoprotein (GP) of LCMV (9, 10). LCMV-neutralizing antibodies have an important function in protection against reinfection (4, 6, 38, 41, 47).In some viral infections, subprotective virus-neutralizing antibody titers can enhance disease rather than promote host recovery (i.e., exhibit antibody-dependent enhancement of disease [ADE] [14, 15, 21, 46]). For example, neutralizing antibodies are involved in the resolution of a primary dengue virus infection and in the protection against reinfection. However, if subprotective neutralizing antibody titers are present at the time of reinfection, a severe form of the disease (dengue hemorrhagic fever/dengue shock syndrome [15, 21]), which might be caused by Fc receptor-mediated uptake of virus-antibody complexes leading to an enhanced infection of monocytes (15, 16, 25, 39), can develop. Similarly, an enhancement of disease after intracerebral (i.c.) LCMV infection was observed in mice which had been treated with virus-neutralizing antibodies before the virus challenge (6). ADE in LCMV-infected mice was either due to an enhanced infection of monocytes by Fc receptor-mediated uptake of antibody-virus complexes or due to CTL-mediated immunopathology caused by an imbalanced virus spread and CTL response.To analyze whether LCMV-neutralizing antibodies generated early after infection improve the host’s capacity to clear the virus or enhance immunopathological disease, immunoglobulin (Ig)-transgenic mice expressing LCMV-neutralizing IgM antibodies were generated. After LCMV infection of transgenic mice expressing the Ig heavy chain (H25 transgenic mice), LCMV-neutralizing serum antibodies were mounted within 8 days, which significantly improved the host’s capacity to eliminate LCMV. H25 transgenic mice did not show any signs of ADE after i.c. LCMV infection.Transgenic mice expressing the Ig heavy and light chains (HL25 transgenic mice) exhibited spontaneous LCMV-neutralizing serum antibodies and confirmed the protective role of preexisting LCMV-neutralizing antibodies, even though the neutralizing serum antibodies were of the IgM isotype. Similar to mice which had been treated with LCMV-neutralizing antibodies, HL25 transgenic mice developed an enhanced disease after i.c. LCMV infection, which indicated that ADE was due to an imbalance between virus spread and CTL response. Thus, the early-inducible LCMV-neutralizing antibody response significantly enhanced clearance of the acute infection without any risk of causing ADE.