Contacts between Wolffian and Müllerian cells at the tip of the outgrowing Müllerian duct in rat embryos

The developing Müllerian duct was studied at the light microscopic as well as the electron microscopic level in rat embryos, especially in the section of the terminal bud and its tip, where Wolffian and Müllerian duct are enclosed by a common basal membrane. In this zone desmosomes can be found among Wolffian cells and also among Müllerian cells. In addition, we found cell contacts between Müllerian and Wolffian cells, namely short electron-dense segments on adjacent surfaces or disc-shaped thickenings within opposite plasma membranes, as well as fusions of the plasmalemmata over short distances. Until now, these cell contacts have not been described in rat embryos.     

Cellular mechanisms of Müllerian duct formation in the mouse

Regardless of their sex chromosome karyotype, amniotes develop two pairs of genital ducts, the Wolffian and Müllerian ducts. As the Müllerian duct forms, its growing tip is intimately associated with the Wolffian duct as it elongates to the urogenital sinus. Previous studies have shown that the presence of the Wolffian duct is required for the development and maintenance of the Müllerian duct. The Müllerian duct is known to form by invagination of the coelomic epithelium, but the mechanism for its elongation to the urogenital sinus remains to be defined. Using genetic fate mapping, we demonstrate that the Wolffian duct does not contribute cells to the Müllerian duct. Experimental embryological manipulations and molecular studies show that precursor cells at the caudal tip of the Müllerian duct proliferate to deposit a cord of cells along the length of the urogenital ridge. Furthermore, immunohistochemical analysis reveals that the cells of the developing Müllerian duct are mesoepithelial when deposited, and subsequently differentiate into an epithelial tube and eventually the female reproductive tract. Our studies define cellular and molecular mechanisms for Müllerian duct formation.     

Deficiencies of the müllerian ducts induced by norethindrone in the female chick embryo

Norethindrone produces two effects on müllerian ducts (MD) of female chick embryos. It induces the loss of the lower end of both ducts, as a result of a stop in their development, before 8 days. After 12 days NET causes regressions of the upper part of the MD particularly of the oviduct. NET like estrogens are the only known substances which present these both properties.     

Decrease in the secretion of anti-Müllerian hormone by the chick testis during development

At the end of embryonic life the chick embryonic testis possesses a low anti-Müllerian activity, as evidenced by the grafting method to female hosts. The percentage of grafted embryos presenting a Müllerian duct regression is not increased by administration of an anti-estrogenic drug (tamoxifen). This observation does not favour the hypothesis according to which the low percentage of regression could be due to a protection of Müllerian ducts by estrogens from the host ovary. It shows rather that the anti-Müllerian hormone secretion actually decreases during development.     

Müllerian inhibiting substance is present in testes of dogs with persistent müllerian duct syndrome

Breeding studies in a strain of miniature schnauzer dogs with Persistent Müllerian Duct Syndrome (PMDS) indicate this syndrome is inherited as an autosomal recessive trait, as it is in man. Testes of neonatal dogs affected with PMDS and normal male littermates were examined for Müllerian Inhibiting Substance (MIS) production by immunohistochemistry and bioassay. MIS immunoactivity was detected in Sertoli cells of normal and affected pups using an avidin-biotin complex-enhanced method. Rat embryonic Müllerian ducts regressed when cocultured with testis fragments of both normal and affected pups in a graded organ culture bioassay, demonstrating that the MIS produced was bioactive. These findings indicate that Müllerian duct persistence in affected dogs is not due to a mutation in the structural gene for MIS, but rather, by inference, to a failure of response to MIS at the receptor level.     

Expression of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) in the equine testis

Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) induces regression of Müllerian ducts during male fetal development; in the human male, it is expressed in Sertoli cells during fetal development (and through puberty). The objective was to characterize expression of AMH in the fetal, neonatal, prepubertal, and adult equine testis, as well as in equine cryptorchid testes, in select testicular neoplasms, and in intersex gonads, based upon immunohistochemistry (IHC). Testes were removed from equine fetuses at 5.5, 10, and 11 months of gestation, at 12 months of age, and from adult stallions. In addition, cryptorchid testes, testis tumors (teratomas, seminomas, Sertoli cell tumors), and male intersex gonads were examined by IHC for expression of AMH using a goat polyclonal primary antibody (alpha-AMH) directed against a C-terminal peptide antigen from human AMH. Immunolabeling with alpha-AMH was localized to Sertoli cells within the developing seminiferous tubules of fetal, neonatal and prepubertal equine testes, with no expression detected in Sertoli cells from normal adult equine testes. Furthermore, expression was detected in cryptorchid testes (in animals up to 3-4 years of age) and in Sertoli cell tumors and male intersex gonads. In conclusion, AMH was strongly expressed by Sertoli cells in fetal, neonatal and prepubertal equine testes, but not in normal adult testes. That AMH was expressed in cryptorchid testes may provide a useful biomarker for detection of cryptorchid testes, as well as for immunohistochemical characterization of testicular tumors and intersex gonads in the horse.     

Müllerian inhibiting substance in sex-reversed dogs

In normal males, Müllerian Inhibiting Substance (MIS), produced by testes during an embryonic critical period, is thought to induce regression of the Müllerian duct system, including the oviducts and uterus. In XX sex-reversed dogs, an apparent contradiction has been reported: The uterus persists in the presence of testes or ovotestes. The objective of this study is to determine whether testes of XX male and ovotestes of true hermaphrodite dogs produce MIS, and to examine the anatomy of Müllerian duct derivatives of affected dogs for evidence of regression. Gonadal samples were tested for MIS activity in a bioassay. The mean MIS activity score of XX males was similar to that of normal XY males and significantly greater than that of normal XX females. The mean MIS activity score of XX true hermaphrodites was intermediate between normal XX females and XY males. Within the true hermaphrodite group, ovotestes in which the proportion of testicular tissue was greater than or equal to 1/2 had higher MIS scores than those in which the proportion of testicular tissue was less than 1/2. XX males had a well-developed epididymis adjacent to each testis, but no oviducts. In true hermaphrodites, the oviduct regressed and an epididymis was present when greater than or equal to 1/2 of the adjacent ovotestis was testicular, and MIS activity in that gonad was high. A few ovotestes with intermediate levels of MIS activity had both an oviduct and an epididymis. Regression of the oviductal portion of the Müllerian duct system was positively correlated to the amount of testicular tissue and the MIS activity of the gonad, as would be predicted by Jost's original hypothesis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Müllerian inhibiting substance regulates its receptor/SMAD signaling and causes mesenchymal transition of the coelomic epithelial cells early in Müllerian duct regression

Examination of Müllerian inhibiting substance (MIS) signaling in the rat in vivo and in vitro revealed novel developmental stage- and tissue-specific events that contributed to a window of MIS responsiveness in Müllerian duct regression. The MIS type II receptor (MISRII)-expressing cells are initially present in the coelomic epithelium of both male and female urogenital ridges, and then migrate into the mesenchyme surrounding the male Müllerian duct under the influence of MIS. Expression of the genes encoding MIS type I receptors, Alk2 and Alk3, is also spatiotemporally controlled; Alk2 expression appears earlier and increases predominantly in the coelomic epithelium, whereas Alk3 expression appears later and is restricted to the mesenchyme, suggesting sequential roles in Müllerian duct regression. MIS induces expression of Alk2, Alk3 and Smad8, but downregulates Smad5 in the urogenital ridge. Alk2-specific small interfering RNA (siRNA) blocks both the transition of MISRII expression from the coelomic epithelium to the mesenchyme and Müllerian duct regression in organ culture. Müllerian duct regression can also be inhibited or accelerated by siRNA targeting Smad8 and Smad5, respectively. Thus, the early action of MIS is to initiate an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of MISRII-expressing cells and to specify the components of the receptor/SMAD signaling pathway by differentially regulating their expression.     

Heterogeneity in predator micro-habitat use and the maintenance of Müllerian mimetic diversity

Müllerian mimicry, where groups of chemically defended species display a common warning color pattern and thereby share the cost of educating predators, is one of the most striking examples of ecological adaptation. Classic models of Müllerian mimicry predict that all unpalatable species of a similar size and form within a community should converge on a single mimetic pattern, but instead communities of unpalatable species often display a remarkable diversity of mimetic patterns (e.g. neotropical ithomiine butterflies). It has been suggested that this apparent paradox may be explained if different suites of predators and species belonging to different mimicry groups utilize different micro-habitats within the community. We developed a stochastic individual-based model for a community of unpalatable mimetic prey species and their predators to evaluate this hypothesis and to examine the effect of predator heterogeneity on prey micro-habitat use. We found that community-level mimetic diversity was higher in simulations with heterogeneous predator micro-habitat use than in simulations with homogeneous predator micro-habitat use. Regardless of the form of predation, mimicry pattern-based assortative mating caused community-level mimetic diversity to persist. Heterogeneity in predator micro-habitat use led to an increased association between mimicry pattern and prey micro-habitat use relative to homogeneous predator micro-habitat use. This increased association was driven, at least in part, by evolutionary convergence of prey micro-habitat use when predators displayed heterogeneous micro-habitat use. These findings provide a theoretical explanation for an important question in evolutionary biology: how is community-level Müllerian mimetic diversity maintained in the face of selection against rare phenotypes?     

Convergent evolution in the genetic basis of Müllerian mimicry in heliconius butterflies

The neotropical butterflies Heliconius melpomene and H. erato are Müllerian mimics that display the same warningly colored wing patterns in local populations, yet pattern diversity between geographic regions. Linkage mapping has previously shown convergent red wing phenotypes in these species are controlled by loci on homologous chromosomes. Here, AFLP bulk segregant analysis using H. melpomene crosses identified genetic markers tightly linked to two red wing-patterning loci. These markers were used to screen a H. melpomene BAC library and a tile path was assembled spanning one locus completely and part of the second. Concurrently, a similar strategy was used to identify a BAC clone tightly linked to the locus controlling the mimetic red wing phenotypes in H. erato. A methionine rich storage protein (MRSP) gene was identified within this BAC clone, and comparative genetic mapping shows red wing color loci are in homologous regions of the genome of H. erato and H. melpomene. Subtle differences in these convergent phenotypes imply they evolved independently using somewhat different developmental routes, but are nonetheless regulated by the same switch locus. Genetic mapping of MRSP in a third related species, the “tiger” patterned H. numata, has no association with wing patterning and shows no evidence for genomic translocation of wing-patterning loci.     

Müllerian mimicry in aposematic spiny plants

Müllerian mimicry is common in aposematic animals but till recently, like other aspects of plant aposematism was almost unknown. Many thorny, spiny and prickly plants are considered aposematic because their sharp defensive structures are colorful and conspicuous. Many of these spiny plant species (e.g., cacti and Agave in North American deserts; Aloe, Euphorbia and acacias with white thorns in Africa; spiny plants in Ohio; and spiny members of the Asteraceae in the Mediterranean basin) have overlapping territories, and also similar patterns of conspicuous coloration, and suffer from the evolutionary pressure of grazing by the same large herbivores. I propose that many of these species form Müllerian mimicry rings.Key words: aposematic coloration, defense, evolution, herbivory, müllerian mimicry, spines, thornsAposematic (warning) coloration is a biological phenomenon in which poisonous, dangerous or otherwise unpalatable organisms visually advertise these qualities to other animals. The evolution of aposematic coloration is based on the ability of target enemies to associate the visual signal with the risk, damage or non-profitable handling, and later to avoid such organisms as prey. Typical colors of aposematic animals are yellow, orange, red, purple, black, white or brown and combinations of these.^1–5 Many thorny, spiny and prickly plant species were proposed to be aposematic because their sharp defensive structures are usually colorful (yellow, orange, red, brown, black, white) and/or associated with similar conspicuous coloration.^5–22 Animal spines also have similar conspicuous coloration and were proposed to be aposematic.^1,5,17,23Several authors have proposed that mimicry of various types helps in plant defense, e.g.,^9,24–34 More specifically, Müllerian mimicry was already proposed to exist in several defensive plant signaling systems. The first was for several spiny species with white-variegated leaves.^8,10 The second was for some tree species with red or yellow poisonous autumn leaves.³⁵ The third cases are of a mixture of Müllerian and Batesian mimicry, of thorn auto-mimicry found in many Agave species.⁸Here I propose that many species of visually aposematic spiny plants of the following taxa: (1) Cactaceae, (2) the genus Agave, (3) the genus Aloe, (4) African thorny members of the genus Euphorbia, (5) African acacias with white thorns, (6) spiny vascular plants of southeastern Ohio, (7) spiny Near Eastern plants with white variegation on their leaves, (8) Near Eastern members of the Asteraceae with yellow spines, form Müllerian mimicry rings of spiny plants.To consider the existence of Müllerian mimicry rings in aposematic organisms, two factors are needed: (1) a similar signal, and (2) an overlapping distribution in respect to the territory of predators in animals, or herbivores in plants. I will show below that for the plant taxa proposed here to form Müllerian mimicry rings, both criteria operate.The accumulating data about the common association of plant defenses by spines with visual conspicuousness, along with the fact that many such species overlap in their habitat, raises the possibility of the broad phenomenon of existence of Müllerian mimicry rings in plants. Even from the limited number of publications proposing visual aposematism in spiny plants, the operation of vegetal Müllerian mimicry rings seems to be obvious. The phenomenon can now be traced to both the Old World (Asia, Africa and Europe) and the New World (North America). The best-studied cases include Cactaceae and the genera Agave, Aloe and Euphorbia,⁶ African acacias with white thorns,^12,15 Near Eastern spiny plants with white variegation on their leaves,^7,11 aposematic spiny vascular plants of southeastern Ohio,¹⁶ and many spiny Mediterranean species of the Asteraceae with yellow spines.²²In the four spiny taxa (Cactaceae and the genera Agave, Aloe and Euphorbia) that were the first to be proposed as visually aposematic⁶ there is a very strong morphological similarity. In cacti, there are two types of conspicuousness of spines that are typical of many plant species: (1) colorful spines, and (2) white spots, or white or colorful stripes, associated with spines on the stems. These two types of aposematic coloration also dominate the spine system of Agave, Aloe and Euphorbia. The fact that many species of three of these four spiny taxa (Agave, Aloe and Euphorbia) are also poisonous^36–38 further indicates their potential to form Müllerian mimicry rings.I propose that each of these groups for itself and some of these groups (e.g., Cactaceae and the genus Agave in North America; Aloe, Euphorbia and acacias in east and south Africa) that have overlapping distribution and share at least some of the herbivores, form Müllerian mimicry rings.The first Müllerian mimicry ring is of cacti and Agave that have an overlapping distribution over large areas in North America.^37,39 The large herbivores in North America disappeared not so long ago in evolutionary time scales and seem to have shaped the spiny defense of these plant taxa.⁴⁰The second Müllerian mimicry ring is of the spiny and thorny members of the African genera Aloe, Euphorbia and certain acacias with very conspicuous white thorns, which partly overlap in distribution and share various large mammalian herbivores.^12,15,36,41The third Müllerian mimicry ring is the outcome of the common presence of aposematic coloration in spiny vascular plants of southeastern Ohio,¹⁶ with color patterns in thorns and spines similar to those of Cactaceae and the genera Agave, Aloe and Euphorbia described in Lev-Yadun.⁶The next case of potential operation of Müllerian mimicry ring of spiny plants with overlapping territories that suffer from the same large herbivores, but on a much smaller geographical scale, has recently been proposed for several spiny species with white-variegated leaves,⁷ and later for more than 20 spiny species in the flora of Israel that have white markings associated with their spines.¹¹The last case of a probable Müllerian mimicry ring was described by Ronel et al.²² who while studying the spine system of Near Eastern spiny members of the Asteraceae, found 29 spiny species with yellow spines, and additional such species are expected to occur. Since some of these species and others with yellow spines also grow in southern Europe, it is clear that the same phenomenon is also common there.I conclude that Müllerian mimicry rings seem to be very common in plants, and that it is probable that many other spiny plants that form Müllerian mimicry rings are waiting to be studied. Such defensive rings are probably also formed by poisonous plants that share similar colors or odors.     

Mapping of the gene for anti-müllerian hormone to the short arm of human chromosome 19

The gene coding for human anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) was localized to subbands p13.2----p13.3 on chromosome 19, using in situ hybridization and Southern blot analysis of a panel of man-mouse and man-hamster somatic cell hybrids.     

Biosynthesis and secretion of fibronectin in the cultured mesenchymal cells of the developing chick müllerian duct

We have developed a method to separate and isolate the mesenchymal cells from the epithelial cells in the left Müllerian duct of the developing chick. We then cultured the mesenchymal cells in a serum-free medium. Through an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, we detected fibronectin synthesis and release into the medium at stages of Müllerian duct development. Our results demonstrate that the amount of fibronectin secreted by cultured cells gradually decreased in accordance with Müllerian duct differentiation. Similar observations found in the developing embryonic intestine indicate that the highest fibronectin synthesis occurs during early stages of development, when morphogenetic movement and mesenchymal-epithelial interaction are prominent features of embryonic organ differentiation and growth.     

Persistence of müllerian ducts in male rabbits passively immunized against bovine anti-müllerian hormone during fetal life

A female rabbit was immunized against purified bovine AMH and mated. Booster injections were given at Day 8 of pregnancy to ensure a high titer of anti-AMH antibodies at the time the rabbit fetal testis begins to produce AMH. In three consecutive litters, the immunized female produced a total of 12 males, 9 of which had persistent Müllerian duct derivatives. No other significant abnormalities were detected in these animals, which were compared to the offspring of a control saline-injected female. In particular, testicular morphology was normal in most animals, and serum FSH levels did not differ from controls. This experimental model lends no support to the hypothesis that AMH controls extra-Müllerian events of male sex differentiation, nor that of the existence of a regulatory mechanism for synthesis of AMH by Sertoli cells, but it does not definitely exclude these possibilities, inasmuch as our tentative conclusions are based upon study of only one immunized female.     

Müllerian adenosarcoma of the uterus: report of a case with imprint cytology

BACKGROUND: Müllerian adenosarcoma is a rare morphologic variant of uterine sarcoma that, although well described histologically, is scarcely mentioned in the cytologic literature. CASE: A 75-year-old female was suspected of having atypical endometrial hyperplasia on an endometrial smear. However, subsequent imaging techniques revealed the presence of a bulky, polypoid mass filling the uterine cavity. On pathologic examination of the hysterectomy specimen, the polypoid tumor was diagnosed as mullerian adenosarcoma, homologous, with sarcomatous overgrowth, in which the sarcomatous component was compatible with high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. Imprint smears of the tumor consisted of two morphologic patterns, sarcomatous and glandular. The sarcomatous tumor cells, with coarse chromatin and relatively scant cytoplasm, formed small aggregates or appeared alone. These cells were semiround or oval and had conspicuous nucleoli. In addition to these observations, small and large clusters of glandular cells with mild atypism were interspersed with the sarcomatous cells. CONCLUSION: Cytologic examination of müllerian adenosarcoma well reflects its pathologic features.     

Biochemical analysis of bovine testicular anti-Müllerian hormone

Direct biochemical analysis has been applied to bovine testicular anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), purified from incubation medium of bovine fetal testes by immunochromatography on a monoclonal antibody. The hormone contains a high proportion of hydrophobic amino acids and 13.5% carbohydrate. The oligosaccharide composition suggests that both N- and O-glycosidically linked chains are present. The molecular extinction coefficient is 3.27 +/- 0.06. One RIA unit, defined as the amount of hormone released by 1 g fetal bovine testicular tissue incubated during 4 h, corresponds to 3.06 +/- 0.17 microgram protein.     

Identification of differentially expressed genes involved in the regression and development of the chicken Müllerian duct

Müllerian ducts of male chickens undergo regression around day 12 of incubation, but the underlining mechanisms remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that contribute to regression of the Müllerian duct in the chicken. We first employed annealing control primer-based RT-PCR to screen candidate genes differentially expressed in the Müllerian ducts between male and female. Four differentially expressed genes (MSX2, GAL10, VCP and PLCH1) were partially sequenced. The expression of mRNA of the latter genes and MSX1 in the male and female Müllerian ducts were compared at 7.5, 8 and 9 days of incubation using semi-quantitative RT-PCR. The results indicated that both MSX1 and MSX2 mRNA was highly expressed in the male Müllerian duct at day 9 of incubation, whereas, PLCH1 mRNA was lower in the male duct at day 9 of incubation compared to that of the female duct. Although VCP mRNA was expressed in both left and right female Müllerian ducts, no expression was detected in the male duct. Whole mount in situ hybridyzation analysis showed that the expression of MSX1 and MSX2 mRNA were localized specifically in the mesenchymal cells of the male Müllerian duct at day 9 of incubation. In contrast, VCP mRNA expression was observed in both mesenchymal and epithelial cells of the female Müllerian duct but not detected in the male duct. These results suggest that both up-regulation of MSX1 and MSX2 mRNA expression is involved in the regression of the Müllerian duct in male chicken embryo, whereas VCP expression is involved in development of the female duct.     

Timing and irreversibility of Müllerian duct inhibition in the embryonic reproductive tract of the human male

A study was undertaken to determine (1) the effects of endogenous Müllerian inhibiting substance (MIS) on the developing human fetal genital tract; (2) the time in fetal life when MIS is first capable of inhibiting the growth of the embryonic Müllerian ducts; and (3) the reversibility of the effects of MIS on the developing male Müllerian ducts. Human fetal reproductive tracts were transplanted and grown for sustained periods in vivo in athymic nude mice. The genital tracts from 12 male human fetuses, ages 51 to 68 days postovulation, were grafted without their associated gonads into castrated murine hosts and grown for 30 to 70 days. Controls consisted of genital tracts from 8 female human fetuses, ages day 53 to 70 that were grown under identical conditions. Male specimens grew to approximately one-half the size of female specimens and disclosed varying degrees of inhibition of the Müllerian duct system from absence of the Müllerian ducts in older specimens (after Day 63) to poorly segregated segments of stroma as the mildest defect (less than Day 61). It is concluded that (1) MIS secretion by the embryonic testes probably begins before Day 51 of gestation; (2) the effects of MIS are progressive during the so-called critical window; (3) the effects of MIS are permanent; and (4) the mesenchyme is an important target of MIS.     

Tasting the difference: do multiple defence chemicals interact in Müllerian mimicry?

Müllerian mimicry, where two unpalatable species share a warning pattern, is classically believed to be a form of mutualism, where the species involved share the cost of predator education. The evolutionary dynamics of Müllerian mimicry have recently become a controversial subject, after mathematical models have shown that if minor alterations are made to assumptions about the way in which predators learn and forget about unpalatable prey, this textbook case of mutualism may not be mutualistic at all. An underlying assumption of these models is that Müllerian mimics possess the same defence chemical. However, some Müllerian mimics are known to possess different defence chemicals. Using domestic chicks as predators and coloured crumbs flavoured with either the same or different unpalatable chemicals as prey, we provide evidence that two defence chemicals can interact to enhance predator learning and memory. This indicates that Müllerian mimics that possess different defence chemicals are better protected than those that share a single defence chemical. These data provide insight into how multiple defence chemicals are perceived by birds,and how they influence the way birds learn and remember warningly coloured prey. They highlight the importance of considering how different toxins in mimicry rings can interact in the evolution and maintenance of Müllerian mimicry and could help to explain the remarkable variation in chemical defences found within and between species.