Additive Contribution of HLA Class I Alleles in the Immune Control of HIV-1 Infection

Previous studies have identified a central role for HLA-B alleles in influencing control of HIV infection. An alternative possibility is that a small number of HLA-B alleles may have a very strong impact on HIV disease outcome, dominating the contribution of other HLA alleles. Here, we find that even following the exclusion of subjects expressing any of the HLA-B class I alleles (B*57, B*58, and B*18) identified to have the strongest influence on control, the dominant impact of HLA-B alleles on virus set point and absolute CD4 count variation remains significant. However, we also find that the influence of HLA on HIV control in this C-clade-infected cohort from South Africa extends beyond HLA-B as HLA-Cw type remains a significant predictor of virus and CD4 count following exclusion of the strongest HLA-B associations. Furthermore, there is evidence of interdependent protective effects of the HLA-Cw*0401-B*8101, HLA-Cw*1203-B*3910, and HLA-A*7401-B*5703 haplotypes that cannot be explained solely by linkage to a protective HLA-B allele. Analysis of individuals expressing both protective and detrimental alleles shows that even the strongest HLA alleles appear to have an additive rather than dominant effect on HIV control at the individual level. Finally, weak but significant frequency-dependent effects in this cohort can be detected only by looking at an individual''s combined HLA allele frequencies. Taken together, these data suggest that although individual HLA alleles, particularly HLA-B, can have a strong impact, HIV control overall is likely to be influenced by the additive effect of some or all of the other HLA alleles present.HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells play a central role in resolution of primary viremia and the long-term suppression of viral replication (13). Supporting this notion is the observed correlation between possession of particular human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I alleles and control of HIV, measured both directly by time-to-AIDS (5, 6) and indirectly via clinical markers of disease progression (viral load [VL] and CD4 count) (15, 26, 28). Specific HLA class I alleles have been associated with relatively successful control of viral replication and slow disease progression, most notably, alleles HLA-B*57 and HLA-B*27 (1, 7, 12, 15, 21, 23), and also with relatively ineffective control of viral replication and rapid disease progression [B*35(Px), B*5802, and B*18] (5, 15, 17, 23). In addition, general trends suggesting an HLA class I heterozygote advantage (5) and rare allele advantage (28) and, most recently, a correlation between levels of surface expression linked to certain HLA-Cw alleles (11, 27) and HIV control has also been described.Among the different HLA class I loci, the HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses restricted by HLA-B alleles are thought to play the central role in determining disease outcome: the majority of detectable HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses are restricted by HLA-B alleles (3, 15, 16), HLA-B-restricted responses typically express a more effective “polyfunctional” phenotype (14), the strongest HLA-associations with either slow or rapid progression are with HLA-B alleles (5, 10, 11, 15), and HLA-B-restricted CD8⁺ T cells exert the strongest selection pressure on the virus (15, 19, 24). However, whether this apparent association between HIV immune control and HLA-B is a general and causal trend or, rather, is biased by the coincidence that the strongest HLA associations with either extreme of disease control happen, by chance, to involve HLA-B alleles remains uncertain.In order to further investigate the correlation between HLA type and HIV infection control, we here examine a cohort now comprising >1,200 chronically HIV C-clade-infected, treatment-naïve subjects from Durban, South Africa, in an extended analysis following from our previous studies of a smaller cohort (15). We first address the question of whether the dominant role of HLA-B in this population compared to the roles of HLA-A or HLA-C results from the influence of HLA-B alleles in general or is dependent on a few known strong associations, such as that between HLA-B*57 alleles and low viremia. Second, in light of recent data (11, 27), we assess the impact of HLA-C alleles on HIV disease outcome and examine the effect of HLA haplotypes on observed HLA associations with disease control. Third, we investigate the question of whether the impact of certain HLA-B alleles on HIV outcome dominates that of other HLA-B alleles to negate the contribution of the latter or whether the impact of individual HLA alleles can be additive. Finally, we compare the impact of individual HLA alleles on HIV on immune control to the impact of heterozygote and rare allele advantage in this cohort.     

Effective Simian Immunodeficiency Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cells Lack an Easily Detectable,Shared Characteristic

The immune correlates of human/simian immunodeficiency virus control remain elusive. While CD8⁺ T lymphocytes likely play a major role in reducing peak viremia and maintaining viral control in the chronic phase, the relative antiviral efficacy of individual virus-specific effector populations is unknown. Conventional assays measure cytokine secretion of virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells after cognate peptide recognition. Cytokine secretion, however, does not always directly translate into antiviral efficacy. Recently developed suppression assays assess the efficiency of virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells to control viral replication, but these assays often use cell lines or clones. We therefore designed a novel virus production assay to test the ability of freshly ex vivo-sorted simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-specific CD8⁺ T cells to suppress viral replication from SIVmac239-infected CD4⁺ T cells. Using this assay, we established an antiviral hierarchy when we compared CD8⁺ T cells specific for 12 different epitopes. Antiviral efficacy was unrelated to the disease status of each animal, the protein from which the tested epitopes were derived, or the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I restriction of the tested epitopes. Additionally, there was no correlation with the ability to suppress viral replication and epitope avidity, epitope affinity, CD8⁺ T-cell cytokine multifunctionality, the percentage of central and effector memory cell populations, or the expression of PD-1. The ability of virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells to suppress viral replication therefore cannot be determined using conventional assays. Our results suggest that a single definitive correlate of immune control may not exist; rather, a successful CD8⁺ T-cell response may be comprised of several factors.CD8⁺ T cells may play a critical role in blunting peak viremia and controlling human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) replication. The transient depletion of CD8⁺ cells in SIV-infected macaques results in increased viral replication (26, 31, 51, 70). The emergence of virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells coincides with the reduction of peak viremia (12, 39, 42, 63), and CD8⁺ T-cell pressure selects for escape mutants (6, 9, 13, 28, 29, 38, 60, 61, 85). Furthermore, particular major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I alleles are overrepresented in SIV- and HIV-infected elite controllers (15, 29, 33, 34, 46, 56, 88).Because it has been difficult to induce broadly neutralizing antibodies (Abs), the AIDS vaccine field is currently focused on developing a vaccine designed to elicit HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells (8, 52, 53, 82). Investigators have tried to define the immune correlates of HIV control. Neither the magnitude nor the breadth of epitopes recognized by virus-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses correlates with the control of viral replication (1). The quality of the immune response may, however, contribute to the antiviral efficacy of the effector cells. It has been suggested that the number of cytokines that virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells secrete may correlate with viral control, since HIV-infected nonprogressors appear to maintain CD8⁺ T cells that secrete several cytokines, compared to HIV-infected progressors (11, 27). An increased amount of perforin secretion may also be related to the proliferation of HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells in HIV-infected nonprogressors (55). While those studies offer insight into the different immune systems of progressors and nonprogressors, they did not address the mechanism of viral control. Previously, we found no association between the ability of SIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell clones to suppress viral replication in vitro and their ability to secrete gamma interferon (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), or interleukin-2 (IL-2) (18).Evidence suggests that some HIV/SIV proteins may be better vaccine targets than others. CD8⁺ T cells recognize epitopes derived from Gag as early as 2 h postinfection, whereas CD8⁺ T cells specific for epitopes in Env recognize infected cells only at 18 h postinfection (68). Additionally, a previously reported study of HIV-infected individuals showed that an increased breadth of Gag-specific responses was associated with lower viral loads (35, 59, 65, 66). CD8⁺ T-cell responses specific for Env, Rev, Tat, Vif, Vpr, Vpu, and Nef were associated with higher viral loads, with increased breadth of Env in particular being significantly associated with a higher chronic-phase viral set point.None of the many sophisticated methods employed for analyzing the characteristics of HIV- or SIV-specific immune responses clearly demarcate the critical qualities of an effective antiviral response. In an attempt to address these questions, we developed a new assay to measure the antiviral efficacy of individual SIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses sorted directly from fresh peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Using MHC class I tetramers specific for the epitope of interest, we sorted freshly isolated virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells and determined their ability to suppress virus production from SIV-infected CD4⁺ T cells. We then looked for a common characteristic of efficacious epitope-specific CD8⁺ T cells using traditional methods.