拉米夫定联合胸腺肽A1 治疗慢性乙型肝炎的疗效观察

目的:探讨拉米夫定(LAM)联合胸腺肽α1(Tα1)治疗慢性乙型肝炎的长期疗效和安全性。方法:72例慢性乙肝患者(HBV-DNA和HBeAg均阳性),按1:1随机分配进入联合治疗组(LAM+Tα1组)和单用拉米夫定组(LAM组)。结果:治疗1年时LAM+Tα1组HBeAg血清转换率(44.4%,16/36例)明显高于LAM组(5.6%,2/36例),P<0.01。停药1年后,持续的HBeAg血清转换率分别为36.1%(13/36例)和8.3%(3/36例),P<0.01。治疗过程中及停药后,两组HBV-DNA水平均明显下降,但两组的HBV-DNA转阴率相仿。治疗后1年ALT复常率联合治疗组与拉米夫定组相似,分别为75%(27/36例)和66.7%(24/36例)、随访1年时ALT复常率联合治疗组明显高于拉米夫定组,分别为58.3%(21/36例)和16.7%(6/36例)。在治疗过程中,未发现严重的不良反应。结论:LAM联合Tα1治疗慢性乙肝,不良反应少,疗效优于单一LAM用药组。     

阿德福韦酯短程联合拉米夫定治疗慢性乙型肝炎疗效分析

目的:观察阿德福韦酯短程联合拉米夫定治疗HBeAg(+)慢性乙型肝炎的疗效、病毒变异率、耐药发生率、HBV-DNA转阴率(≤5×102pies/ml)、HBeAg血清转换率等指标的观察,探讨更合理、有效、价廉的治疗慢性乙型肝炎的方案。方法:选择2008-2010年我院门诊及住院的HBeAg(+)的慢性乙型肝炎病人,根据用药不同分为三组,进行为期24月的治疗观察,予观察其肝肾功能、HBV-DNA、病毒变异、耐药发生率等指标的变化情况,并进行比较。结果:治疗24个月时,三组患者显效率分别为90%(27/30)、46.88%(15/32)、44.82%(13/29),三组显效率比较,2=53.982,P<0.05,显效率差异有统计学意义。总体有效率(显效+有效)A组96.67%、B组68.75%、C组72.41%。三组患者第3、6、12、24个月治疗效果均有差异(x2=18.746,P<0.05;x2=61.723,P<0.05;x2=26.821,P<0.05;x2=18.291,P<0.05)。三组患者第24个月ALT、AST、TSB、ALB和PT等肝肾功能指标比较,均有差异(t=2.107,P<0.05;t=3.113,P<0.01;t=2.764,P<0.01;t=2.155,P<0.01)。治疗结束时,三组HBeAg血清转换例数比较,2=8.220,P<0.05,三组HBeAg血清转换情况差异有统计学意义。采用t检验比较三组第3、6、12、24个月HBV-DNA中位值,均有差异(t=1.997,P<0.05;t=2.982,P<0.01;t=2.651,P<0.01;t=3.113,P<0.01)。阿德福韦酯短程联合拉米夫定组共发生3例不良反应,单用拉米夫定组发生4例不良反应,单药使用阿德福韦酯发生不良反应为3例。结论:阿德福韦酯短程联合拉米夫定治疗慢性乙型肝炎疗效和安全性均较高,用药方案具有合理性、有效性,效价比高,适合临床应用。     

拉米夫定联合胸腺肽α1治疗慢性乙型肝炎的疗效观察

目的：探讨拉米夫定（LAM）联合胸腺肽α1（Tα1）治疗慢性乙型肝炎的长期疗效和安全性.方法：72例慢性乙肝患者（HBV-DNA和HBeAg均阳性）,按1：1随机分配进入联合治疗组（LAM＋Tα1组）和单用拉米夫定组（LAM组）.结果：治疗1年时LAM＋Tα1组HBeAg血清转换率（44.4%,16/36例）明显高于LAM组（5.6%,2/36例）,P〈0.01.停药1年后,持续的HBeAg血清转换率分别为36.1%（13/36例）和8.3%（3/36例）,P〈0.01.治疗过程中及停药后,两组HBV-DNA水平均明显下降,但两组的HBV-DNA转阴率相仿.治疗后1年ALT复常率联合治疗组与拉米夫定组相似,分别为75%（27/36例）和66.7%（24/36例）、随访1年时ALT复常率联合治疗组明显高于拉米夫定组,分别为58.3%（21/36例）和16.7%（6/36例）.在治疗过程中,未发现严重的不良反应.结论：LAM联合Tα1治疗慢性乙肝,不良反应少,疗效优于单一LAM用药组.     

慢性乙型肝炎治疗中HBV YMDD变异的相关因素分析

目的 探讨拉米夫定治疗慢性乙型肝炎过程中HBV YMDD变异的相关因素。方法 对应用拉米夫定治疗的22例慢性乙型肝炎患者进行肝功能、乙肝病毒血清学标志物、HBV YMDD变异检测,同时进行肝组织病理学检查。结果 ALT异常率为55%,HBeAg血清转换率为13.6%,HBV YMDD变异发生率为31%,治疗前病毒量的高低不影响其治疗效果。5例患者肝穿组织中HBsAg和HBcAg依然阳性。结论 运用拉米夫定治疗慢性乙型肝炎6个月后可出现HBV YMDD变异,随着治疗时间延长,其变异发生率越高;HBeAg血清转换率不高;肝组织内仍处于炎症及纤维化状态。     

拉米夫定联合阿德福韦酯治疗乙型肝炎的疗效及对HBV耐药基因突变的影响

目的探讨拉米夫定联合阿德福韦酯治疗慢性乙型肝炎的疗效,并利用反向点杂交技术检测其对HBV基因耐药突变的影响。方法156例慢性乙型肝炎患者随机分为2组：对照组70例采用拉米夫定治疗,治疗组86例采用拉米夫定联合阿德福韦酯治疗。采用实时荧光定量PCR和ELISA检测2组治疗前和治疗后48周的HBV-DNA载量和HBeAg并采用PCR-反向点杂交技术（PCR-RDB）检测2组治疗48周后的HBV耐药基因突变情况。结果对照组及治疗组在经过48周治疗后HBV-DNA载量较治疗前都明显下降（P 〈0. 05）,治疗组HBV-DNA载量明显低于对照组（P〈0.05）。治疗组经过48周治疗后HBeAg的阴转率为54.9%,明显高于对照组15.0% （P 〈0.05）。对照组44例未出现耐药突变,25例拉米夫定耐药突变中rtL180M突变6例,rtM204V/I突变11例,rtL180M ＋ rtM204V/I混合突变8例;阿德福韦酯HN236T耐药突变1例。治疗组77例未出现耐药突变;5例拉米夫定耐药突变中rtL180M突变1例,rtM204V/I突变2例,rtL180M ＋ rtM204V/I混合突变2例;阿德福韦酯耐药突变中rtN236T突变1例;拉米夫定和阿德福韦酯交叉耐药rtN236T ＋ rtM204V/I混合突变3例。对照组耐药突变率为37. 1%（26/70）明显髙于治疗组的10.5%（9/86）（P〈0.05）。结论拉米夫定联合阿德福韦酯对治疗慢性乙型肝炎方面有效并在减少HBV耐药基因突变方面具有一定的作用。     

阿德福韦酯联合拉米夫定治疗乙型肝炎DNA阳性肝硬化疗效观察

目的：探讨阿德福韦酯联合拉米夫定治疗HBV DNA阳性乙型肝炎肝硬化的疗效。方法：46例HBV DNA阳性乙肝肝硬化患者随机分为对照组及观察组。在保肝等对症治疗基础上,观察组22例患者联用阿德福韦酯与拉米夫定,对照组24例患者予阿德福韦酯,总疗程均为48周。结果：在治疗12周后,观察组与对照组HBV DNA转阴率分别为54.5%、20.8%（P〈0.05）,ALT复常率分别为63.6%、33.3%（P〈0.05）。治疗24周、48周后上述指标无统计学差异。两组患者未见明显药物不良反应。结论：阿德福韦酯联合拉米夫定治疗HBV DNA阳性乙型肝炎肝硬化起效快,降低病毒载量疗效佳,安全性好。     

阿德福韦酯联合拉米夫定治疗乙型肝炎DNA 阳性肝硬化疗效观察

目的:探讨阿德福韦酯联合拉米夫定治疗HBV DNA阳性乙型肝炎肝硬化的疗效。方法:46例HBV DNA阳性乙肝肝硬化患者随机分为对照组及观察组。在保肝等对症治疗基础上,观察组22例患者联用阿德福韦酯与拉米夫定,对照组24例患者予阿德福韦酯,总疗程均为48周。结果:在治疗12周后,观察组与对照组HBV DNA转阴率分别为54.5%、20.8%(P<0.05),ALT复常率分别为63.6%、33.3%(P<0.05)。治疗24周、48周后上述指标无统计学差异。两组患者未见明显药物不良反应。结论:阿德福韦酯联合拉米夫定治疗HBV DNA阳性乙型肝炎肝硬化起效快,降低病毒载量疗效佳,安全性好。     

苦参素联合拉米夫定治疗慢性乙型肝炎临床研究

目的：探讨拉米夫定（LAM）联合苦参素治疗慢性乙型肝炎（CHB）患者的临床疗效。方法：将慢性乙型肝炎患者134倒随机分为治疗组（68例）与对照组（66例）。治疗组给予LAM联合苦参素治疗;对照组单用LAM。疗程6个月,随访6个月。观察治疗前后的血生化,HBeAg,HBVDNA等指标的变化情况。结果：疗程结束后和停药6个月后,治疗组患者血清HBeAg、HBVDNA等指标显著下降,与对照组比较差异有显著性（P〈0．05或P〈0．01）。结论：LAM联合苦参素治疗CHB疗效优于LAM单一用药。     

恩替卡韦联合胸腺肽α1 治疗慢性乙型肝炎疗效研究

目的:观察和比较恩替卡韦联合胸腺肽α1治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎的疗效。方法:选取我院58例HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者分成联合组和对照组。联合组28例,初始同时使用恩替卡韦及胸腺肽α124周,之后停胸腺肽α1继续用恩替卡韦至48周。对照组30例,单用恩替卡韦0.5mg/d,48周。定期检测ALT复常率,HBVDNA转阴率,HBeAg/抗HBe血清转换率,肝纤维化组合,Fibroscan评分两组在治疗结束时进行疗效评价。结果:24周时两组ALT复常率无差异显著性(P>0.05),联合组和对照组HBV DNA阴转率在24周、48周时均差异有显著性(P<0.05)。联合组与单用组HBeAg血清转换率在第24周、48周时,两组比较差异均有显著性(P<0.05)。肝纤维化组合各指标(HA,LN,PⅢP,Ⅳ型胶原),Fibroscan评分两组治疗48周后比较差异均有显著性(P<0.05),且两组治疗前后差异联合组更显著。治疗过程中,未发现明显副作用。结论:恩替卡韦联合胸腺肽α1治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎,安全性与耐受性良好,联合组在ALT复常率,HBeAg血清转换率和HBV DNA转阴率,抗肝纤维化的疗效上显著优于单用恩替卡韦组。     

阿德福韦酯治疗乙型肝炎的疗效及安全性分析

目的探讨阿德福韦酯治疗慢性乙型病毒性肝炎患者的临床疗效及安全性。方法将我院2010年2月~2014年4月收治的90例慢性乙型肝炎患者给予阿德福韦酯治疗,并定期监测(丙氨酸氨基酸转移酶)ALT,HBV DNA,HBeAg和抗-HBe,观察其病毒学应答率、血清学转换率、病毒学突破率和复发率;分析抗病毒治疗基线ALT(u/L)与血清学转换率。结果 (1)6个月累计病毒学应答率91.11%(82/90),1年为100%;(2)HBeAg阳性者1、2、3年累计HBeAg血清学转换率分别为27.91%、34.69%、40.33%;(3)基线ALT≥5×正常值上限(u/L)的患者3年发生HBeAg血清学转换率高于基线ALT5×正常值上限(u/L)的患者(50.00%、42.22%,χ2=5.527,P=0.013)。结论基线ALT水平可作为3年HBeAg血清学转换率预测指标;抗病毒治疗达我国《指南》终点标准仅仅是基本的停药标准,部分病人达标后仍有复发风险;阿德福韦酯治疗慢性乙型肝炎疗效确切,安全性高,值得临床推广应用。     

Antiviral therapy against chronic hepatitis B in Brazil: high rates of lamivudine resistance mutations and correlation with HBV genotypes

The effectiveness of antiviral treatments of chronic hepatitis B has been poorly studied in Brazil. Here, hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA positivity, drug resistance mutations and their association with HBV genotypes were evaluated in chronically HBV-infected patients under different drug regimens in Brazil. The study involved 129 patients under interferon or nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy for a median treatment time of 12 months. One hundred and five (81%) of these patients were treated with lamivudine (LAM), either in monotherapy or in combination with newer drugs, such as entecavir (ETV) or tenofovir (TDF). High (37.5-100%) rates of HBV DNA positivity were observed with all but one drug regimen (LAM + ETV). However, patients that were treated with ETV alone, TDF alone or with LAM combination therapies had a mean viral load that was 3-4 log lower than patients treated with LAM monotherapy. Of the patients treated with LAM, 47% developed resistance mutations. HBV genotypes A (59.1%), D (30.3%) and F (9.1%) were found. There was no association between the presence of LAM resistance mutations and genotypes, HBeAg status or treatment duration. Nevertheless, the rtM204V mutation was observed more frequently (12/13, 92%) in genotype A than in the others (p = 0.023). Six out of nine isolates that contained the rtM204I mutation belonged to genotype D and half of them displayed a single mutation. Genotype D isolates with the rtM204V variant preferentially displayed a triple mutation, while genotype A preferentially displayed a double mutation (p = 0.04).     

干扰素α-1b联合阿德福韦酯治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎疗效分析

目的：探讨干扰素α-1b联合阿德福韦酯（Adefovir Dipivoxil Tablets,ADV）治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎（ChronichepatitisB,CHB）患者临床疗效。方法：随即将120例CHB患者分为3组：单用ADV组（A组）40例;单用IFNa-1b组（B组）40例;IFNα-1b和ADV联合治疗组（c组）40例,疗程48周。分别于治疗12周、24周和48周时查ALT复常率,HIhAg血清转换率,乙型肝炎病毒（hepatitisBvirus,HBV）DNA阴转率。其中各组中10人于治疗前及治疗48周行肝穿刺活检术,观察病理改变,根据炎症活动度（G）和纤维化程度（S）进行计分,同时采用纤维化半定量计分系统（sss）评分。结果：A组和B组ALT复常率,24周：X^2=4．80、7．92,48周：X^2=3．97、6．51,P均〈0．05;HBeAg转换率,24周：X^2=12.25、4．17,48周：X^2=-14．57、4．94。P均〈0．01;HBVDNA转阴率。24周：X2=-3．74、9．77,48周：X^2=6．98、11．95,P均〈0．05。c组24周和48周后ALT复常率分别为65．0％和87．5％,HBeAg转换率为35．0％和45．0％,HBVDNA阴转率为75．5％和92．5％,显著高于A组和B组。组织学肝纤维化各项评分结果联合治疗组均优于单药组,差异有统计学意Y,．（SSS：t=-23．26、48．98;G：t=-53．88、94．30;S：t=-60．00、82．05,P均〈0．01）。结论：IFN联合ADV治疗CHB患者可协同抑制HBV复制,显著提高抗HBV疗效,且无明显不良反应。是一种有效的治疗方法。     

阿德福韦酯联合乙肝免疫球蛋白预防HBV 相关性终末期肝病肝移植术 后复发的临床研究

目的:探讨阿德福韦酯(HDV)联合乙肝免疫球蛋白(HBIg)预防HBV相关性终末期肝病患者肝移植术后HBV复发的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析2005年6月～2009年6月北京市解放军第302医院因HBV相关性终末期肝病接受肝移植的60例患者的临床资料。60例患者根据治疗方法分为治疗组和对照组,治疗组采用HDV联合HBIg预防肝移植术后HBV复发,对照组采用拉米夫定(LAM)联合HBIg预防HBV复发。结果:两组患者随访期内未出现肾毒性表现。治疗组平均随访时间为(21.67±5.37)月,随访期内无复发。对照组平均随访时间为(21.83±6.02)月,随访期内有2例复发。两组术后复发率比较有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:HDV联合HBIg预防肝移植术后HBV复发近期疗效优于LAM联合HBIg。     

阿德福韦酯联合乙肝免疫球蛋白预防HBV相关性终末期肝病肝移植术后复发的临床研究

目的：探讨阿德福韦酯（HDV）联合乙肝免疫球蛋白（HBIg）预防HBV相关性终末期肝病患者肝移植术后HBV复发的临床疗效。方法：回顾性分析2005年6月-2009年6月北京市解放军第302医院因HBV相关性终末期肝病接受肝移植的60例患者的临床资料。60例患者根据治疗方法分为治疗组和对照组,治疗组采用HDV联合HBk预防肝移植术后HBV复发,对照组采用拉米夫定（LAM）联合HBIg预防HBV复发。结果：两组患者随访期内未出现肾毒性表现。治疗组平均随访时间为（21．67±5．37）月,随访期内无复发。对照组平均随访时间为（21．83±6．02）月,随访期内有2例复发。两组术后复发率比较有显著性差异（P〈0．05）。结论：HDV联合HBIg预防肝移植术后HBV复发近期疗效优于LAM联合HBIg。     

Comparison of the Efficacies and Safety of Combined Therapy between Telbivudine Plus Adefovir and Lamivudine Plus Adefovir in Patients with Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Real-World Practice

MethodsThis study enrolled a total of 171 patients (110 patients received LAM+ADV and 60 patients received LdT+ADV). We analyzed the changes in renal function using the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The DNA undetectable rate, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion rate, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization rate were analyzed. We checked the serum uric acid, phosphate and creatine kinase, and lactic acid levels to analyze safety. We observed these patients for 48 to 240 weeks and checked their serum profile every 6 months.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) efficacy in terms of DNA undetectable rate, ALT normalization rate, and HBeAg seroconversion rate. Both the LAM+ADV and LdT+ADV groups had stable or improved renal function. However, a higher eGFR was found in the LdT+ADV group with continuous serum fluctuation during 3 years of combined therapy as well as a higher serum creatine kinase level.ConclusionsLong-term LdT+ADV combined therapy and LAM+ADV combined therapy were both associated with stable or improved renal function. The clinical efficacy was similar between the two groups, but the LdT group had a higher serum creatine kinase level. We need to monitor the data regularly in clinical practice.     

Comparison of the Efficacy of Entecavir and Tenofovir in Nucleos(T)ide Analogue-Experienced Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

The efficacy of entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir (TDF) for the treatment of nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-experienced chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients has been little studied. Here, we compare the efficacy of both ETV and TDF in NA-experienced CHB patients without detectable genotypic resistance. This retrospective cohort study included consecutive NA-experienced patients who had neither current nor previous genotypic resistance and had received ETV or TDF for at least 6 months. Overall, 202 patients (146 patients in the ETV group and 56 in the TDF group) were analyzed. The cumulative probabilities of complete virologic suppression (CVS) at month 12 were 76.1% in the ETV group and 95.0% in the TDF group (P<0.001), respectively. The TDF-treated group achieved CVS more rapidly than the ETV group for both Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative and -positive patients (P = 0.006 and < 0.001, respectively), and for those with both low (< 2,000 IU/mL) and high (≥ 2,000 IU/mL) HBV DNA levels (P = 0.01 and 0.002, respectively). TDF group had an increased probability of achieving CVS (hazard ratio, 2.242; 95% confidence interval, 1.587–3.165; P = 0.001), after adjustment for HBV DNA level, the presence of HBeAg, and a history of CVS during prior treatment. During the treatment period, 23 patients (15.8%) in the ETV group developed virologic breakthrough, compared to none in the TDF group. The cumulative probabilities of developing virologic breakthrough and ETV-resistance at month 24 were 9.7% and 5.3%, respectively. In conclusion, TDF is preferable to ETV for achieving CVS in NA-experienced CHB patients without genotypic resistance.     

恩替卡韦治疗HBeAg 阳性乙型肝炎临床观察

目的:探讨恩替卡韦治疗HBeAg阳性乙型肝炎的疗效与安全性。方法:140例慢性乙肝患者随机分为2组:观察组予恩替卡韦0.5 mg/d,对照组予拉米夫定100 mg/d,疗程均为48周。观察两组HBV DNA阴转率、ALT复常率、HbeAg血清转换率以及不良反应发生情况。结果:在治疗12周后,观察组与对照组HBV DNA阴转率分别为47.1%、22.9%(P<0.01),ALT复常率分别为51.4%、31.4%(P<0.05),在治疗48周后,观察组与对照组HBV DNA阴转率分别为88.6%、48.6%(P<0.01),ALT复常率分别为90.0%、72.9%(P<0.01)。HbeAg血清转换率无统计学差异,两组患者未见严重不良反应。结论:恩替卡韦治疗HBeAg阳性乙肝患者,较拉米夫定起效快、作用强,且安全性好。     

内蒙古地区乙型肝炎病毒的基因分型及临床意义

为了探讨乙型肝炎病毒在内蒙古地区的基因分型,为本地区乙型肝炎的临床治疗、病情进展和发病机制等方面研究提供有益的实验依据。2013年7月至2014年7月本研究在内蒙古自治区人民医院、内蒙古医科大学第一附属医院、通辽市医院的门诊及住院病例中随机选取已感染乙型肝炎病毒的253例。以荧光定量PCR法检测HBV基因分型和HBV病毒基因载量,Elisa法检测血清标志物HBeAg,全自动生化分析仪检测ALT、AST、TBA、TBIL和ALB。实验发现,内蒙古地区253例患者HBV基因分型结果以B型(49例,19.37%)、C型(188例,74.31%)为主,且C基因型显著多于B基因型(p<0.05);HBeAg阳性率为67.59%,且C基因型HBeAg阳性率高于B基因型;高载量病例中B型占31例(63.27%),而C型占162例(86.17%),C基因型组中HBV DNA载量显著高于B基因型组(p<0.01);B基因型与C基因型TBA、TBIL和ALB结果比较差异无统计学意义(p>0.05),但C基因型的ALT和AST这两项生化指标均显著高于B基因型组(p<0.05)。本研究结果初步说明,内蒙古地区HBV感染以B型和C型为主,尤以C型居多;且C型病毒的复制较活跃,致病力较强,HBV感染者更易转成严重肝病。     

重庆地区乙肝血清特殊模式患者HBV基因分型及临床自然病程分析

目的了解重庆地区乙肝病毒（HBV）血清学标志物为特殊模式的HBV感染患者病毒基因型的分布情况,分析其临床特征及自然病程。方法从1000例HBV感染者中检测到48例乙肝病毒血清学标志物为特殊模式的患者（HBsAg与抗一HBs同时阳性,HBeAg与抗一HBe同时阳性）。采用巢式聚合酶链式反应（nPCR）对特殊模式患者的HBV进行基因分型,同时对两组特殊模式患者的临床资料和HBV感染的自然史进行分析。结果48例乙肝病毒血清学标志物为特殊模式的HBV感染者中,36例患者HBsAg与抗-HBs同时阳性,12例患者HBeAg与抗-HBe同时阳性。HBeAg＋／抗-HBe＋患者组的年龄较HBsAg＋／抗-HBs＋患者组的小（P〈0．05）。HBsAg＋／抗-HBs＋患者中,3例（8．3％）为B2亚型,12例（33．3％）为c2亚型,21例（58．4％）未分型;HBeAg＋／抗-HBe＋患者中,8例（66．7％）为B2亚型,1例（8．3％）为c2亚型,3例（25．0％）未分型,两组在HBV基因型的分布上差异具有统计学意义（Y2=17．44,P〈0．05）。在HBsAg＋／抗-HBs＋患者中,2例（4．2％）处于免疫清除期,14例（29．2％）处于低复制期,7例（14．6％）处于再活动期。HBeAg＋／抗-HBe＋患者中,5例（10．4％）处于免疫清除期。两组在HBV感染的自然病程中的分布差异具有统计学意义（X2=18．26,P〈0．05）。结论重庆地区乙肝病毒血清学标志物为特殊模式的慢性HBV感染者中,HBeAg与抗-HBe同时阳性的HBV感染者中B2亚型为优势基因型;HBsAg与抗-HBs同时阳性的HBV感染者中,HBV基因型以C2亚型为主。     

Research on hepatitis B virus genotypes and subgenotypes among Bai nationality in Dali, Yunnan Province

To investigate the distribution of hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes and subgenotypes among the Bai nationality in Dali, a total of 100 serum samples from patients with chronic HBV-infection were collected for the detection of HBV genotypes and subgenotypes by genotype-specific primers and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RLFP), respectively. Among the 100 samples, the proportions of genotype B, C and mixed genotype (B C) were 41%, 25% and 34%, respectively. All the genotype B strains belonged to subgenotype Ba. In genotype C, 84% were Subgenotype Cs and 12% were subgenotype Ce. The distribution of genotypes B, C and B C showed no significant difference between male and female patients (P=0.182) and among the age groups of patients (P=0.812). The rates of HBeAg/HBeAg positivity were no significantly different among genotypes B, genotype C and mixed genotype (B C) (P=0.077/P=0.663). In Dali, genotypes B, B C and C existed among Bai nationality with chronic HBV-infection, and genotype B was the major genotype. Subgenotypes Ba and Cs were the predominant strains in patients with HBV genotype B/C infection. The most prominent characteristic was the higher prevalent rate of mixed genotype (B C) in patients.