Differential Responses of Buds along the Shoot to Factors Involved in Apical Dominance

Intact and decapitated 6-node shoots of Hygrophila sp. weregrown aseptically immersed in liquid half-strength Knop's solutionwith microelements and 2% (w/v) sucrose (control medium), andin medium with 0.1 mg l^–1 benzyladenine (BA). In intactshoots grown in control medium apical dominance suppressed outgrowthof the lateral buds; in decapitated shoots buds grew out atseveral of the most apical nodes, increasing in size acropetally.There was a lag in outgrowth of the bud at the most apical node,attributable to its initially smaller size. Lateral shoots grewout first at basal nodes of intact shoots in BA medium, decreasingin size acropetally; in decapitated shoots in BA medium lateralshoots of approximately equal size grew out at all nodes. Differentialeffects of decapitation and cytokinin treatment on lateral shootoutgrowth along the shoot could be interpreted by postulatinga basipetally decreasing gradient of endogenous auxin concentrationin the intact shoot. Application of 20 mg l^–1 indoleaceticacid (IAA) in agar to decapitated shoots completely preventedbud outgrowth for at least 7 d in control medium, inhibitingit thereafter, and inhibited bud outgrowth in BA medium, thussupporting the hypothesis. Comparison of lateral shoot outgrowthin whole decapitated shoots and severed decapitated shoots (isolatednodes) lent no support to the alternative hypothesis that theremight be an acropetally decreasing concentration gradient ofa bud-promoting substance in the intact shoot, and demonstratedmuch greater lateral shoot growth in isolated nodes. The resultsemphasize important correlative relationships between the partsof a shoot with several nodes.     

Grafting Experiments on Correlative Effects between Lateral Buds

Shoots of Hygrophila sp., which are decussate and have budsof unequal size at a node, were grown in liquid culture. Inexcised nodes it is known that the larger (+) bud inhibits thesmaller (–) bud in the axil of the opposite leaf, andonly one shoot grows out; in nodes split longitudinally bothbuds grow out. When nodes were split and grafted together again(+/– grafts), in general only one bud grew out; if aluminiumfoil was introduced at the nodal region both buds grew out.Thus the inhibitory effect of a + on a – bud is laterallytransmissible across a graft union. In +/– grafts of half-nodesdiffering in age by two plastochrones, a higher proportion yieldedtwo shoots, suggesting that the age differential had some importance.This view is supported by observations on sectioned material.Grafts having two + or two – buds (+/+ grafts) were madebetween half-nodes differing in age by two plastochrones; inthe majority both buds grew out. Thus a + bud inhibits a –bud but usually not another + bud; in either case a considerabledifference in stage of development of the half-nodes may affectthe results. It is concluded that bud dominance resembles apicaldominance, and is probably mediated by hormonal means.     

Influence of Bud Position and Plant Ontogeny on the Morphology of Branch Shoots in Pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. Alaska)

The morphology of axillary shoots of pea plants (Pisum sativumL. cv. Alaska) was analysed as a function of the position ofthe bud on the plant axis and the stage of plant developmentwhen the buds began to grow. Buds from the three most basalnodes were stimulated to develop by decapitating the main shootwhen buds were still growing (4 d plants), shortly after budsbecame dormant (7 d plants) or after the initiation of floweringon the main shoot (post-flowering plants, about 21 d after sowing).Branch shoots were scored for node of floral initiation (NFI),shoot length, and node of multiple leaflets (NML), a measureof leaf complexity. Shoots that developed spontaneously fromupper nodes (nodes 5-9) on intact post-flowering plants werescored for NFI. NFI for basal buds on 4 and 7 d plants variedas a function of nodal position and ranged from 5 to 6·7nodes. NFI on these plants was not influenced by bud size orwhether a bud was growing or dormant when the plant was decapitated.NFI for shoots derived from basal buds on decapitated post-floweringplants and upper nodes on intact post-flowering plants was about4. Reduced NFI on post-flowering plants may be due to depletionof a cotyledon-derived floral inhibitor. Basal axillary shootson 4 d plants were about 20% longer than those on 7 d plantsand about five times longer than those on post-flowering plants.These differences may be due to depletion of gibberellic acidsfrom the cotyledons. NFI and NML for the main shoot and forbasal axillary shoots were similar under some experimental conditionsbut different under other conditions, so it is likely that eachdevelopmental transition is regulated independently.Copyright1995, 1999 Academic Press Apical dominance, bud development, garden pea, initiation of flowering, Pisum sativum L., shoot morphology     

Abscisic Acid and Apical Dominance in Phaseolus coccineus L. The Role of Tissue Age

Abscisic acid (ABA) applied to the decapitated second internodeof runner bean plants enhanced outgrowth of lateral buds onlywhen internode stumps were no longer elongating. Applied toelongating internodes of slightly younger plants, ABA causesinhibition of bud outgrowth. Together with 10^–4 M indol-3-ylacetic acid (IAA), ABA stimulated internode elongation and interactedadditively in the inhibition of bud outgrowth. A mixture of10^–5 M ABA and 10^–6 M gibberellic acid (GA₃ ) causedsimilar effects on internode growth as IAA + ABA, but was mutuallyantagonistic in effect on growth of the lateral buds. Abscisic acid, apical dominance, gibberellic acid, indol-3yl acetic acid, Phaseolus coccineus, bean     

Bud Content and its Relation to Shoot Size and Structure in Nothofagus pumilio(Poepp. et Endl.) Krasser (Nothofagaceae)

Buds of shoots from the trunk, main branches, secondary branchesand short branches of 10–21 year-old Nothofagus pumiliotrees were dissected and their contents recorded. The numberof differentiated nodes in buds was compared with the numberof nodes of sibling shoots developed at equivalent positionsduring the following growing season. Axillary buds generallyhad four cataphylls, irrespective of bud position in the tree,whereas terminal buds had up to two cataphylls. There were morenodes in terminal buds, and the most distal axillary buds, oftrunk shoots than in more proximal buds of trunk shoots, andin all buds of shoots at all other positions. The highest numberof nodes in the embryonic shoot of a bud varied between 15 and20. All shoots had proximal lateral buds containing an embryonicshoot with seven nodes, four with cataphylls and three withgreen leaf primordia. The largest trunk, and main branch, shootswere made up of a preformed portion and a neoformed portion;all other shoots were entirely preformed. In N. pumilio, theacropetally-increasing size of the sibling shoots derived froma particular parent shoot resulted from differences in: (1)the number of differentiated organs in the buds; (2) the probabilityof differentiation of additional organs during sibling shootextension; (3) sibling shoot length; (4) sibling shoot diameter;and (5) the death of the apex and the most distal leaves ofeach sibling shoot. Copyright 2000 Annals of Botany Company Axis differentiation, branching, bud structure, leaf primordia, neoformation, Nothofagus pumilio, preformation, size gradient     

Exogenous Auxin Effects on Lateral Bud Outgrowth in Decapitated Shoots

In 1933 Thimann and Skoog demonstrated exogenous auxin repressionof lateral bud outgrowth in decapitated shoots ofVicia faba. This evidence has given strong support for a role of auxinin apical dominance. Most, but not all, investigators have confirmedThimann and Skoog's results. In the present study, auxin treatmentswere carried out on ten different species or plant types, manyof which were treated with auxin in different forms, media andunder different light conditions. The Thimann–Skoog experimentdid work for most species (i.e. exogenous auxin did repressbud outgrowth) including thedgt tomato mutant which is knownto be insensitive to auxin in certain responses. Toxic auxinsymptoms were observed in some but not all species. The Thimann–Skoogexperiment did not work for greenhouse-grownColeus or forArabidopsis. Light was shown to reduce apical dominance inColeus andIpomoeanil . apical dominance; lateral bud outgrowth; axillary bud; auxin; IAA; decapitation; Vicia faba ; Ipomoea nil ; Pisum sativum ; Phaseolus vulgaris ; Lycopersion exculentum ; dgt ; Coleus blumei ; Arabidopsis thaliana ; Helianthus annuus ; Thimann–Skoog     

Studies of Growth and Flowering in Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr. 2. Initiation and Development of Male, Female and Vegetative Buds

Vegetative shoots from the base of the crown, and from partsof the tree likely to form male or female buds, were collectedfrom 40–years–old trees of Picea sitchensis (Bong.)Carr. throughout the 1973–4 annual growth cycle. The morphologyand growth rates of the terminal buds on these shoots were assessed. Bud scale primordia were formed most quickly in the female position,at an intermediate rate in the male position and most slowlyin the basal vegetative position during April, May and June.In July and early August the apical meristems swelled to formdomes and continued to grow at the same relative rates in themale, female and basal vegetative positions. Reproductive budswere first morphologically distinct in late August and sporangiaappeared in October. Dormancy, defined by the pause in apicalvolume increase, extended from mid-October to mid–March.Young strobili grew much faster than basal vegetative shootsof the same age between mid–March and bud burst in lateApril. Throughout the growth cycle, external changes in budsize reflected changes in size of the apical meristem, youngstrobihis or young vegetative shoot inside the bud. It is proposed that the rate of growth of an apical meristemmay be causally related to the type of bud which subsequentlydevelops from it. Sitka spruce, Picea sitchensis, bud development, morphology, growth of apical dome, flowering     

Correlative Inhibition of Lateral Bud Growth in Pisum sativum L. and Phaseolus vulgaris L.: Studies of the Role of Abscisic Acid

The possibility has been investigated that abscisic acid (ABA)might act as a correlative inhibitor of lateral bud growth inPisum sativum and Phaseolus vulgaris. Application of ABA insmall quantities (2µg) to axillary buds on decapitatedplants of P. sativum caused appreciable inhibition of theirgrowth, and induced a compensatory growth of the bud on an adjacentnode. Application of this same quantity of ABA to axillary budson decapitated plants of Phaseolus vulgaris was without effect,but a high concentration in lanolin (1 mg g^–1) did substantiallyreduce bud outgrowth. Endogenous ABA-like substances in Phaseolusvulgaris, detected by bioassay and electron capture g.l.c.,were present in similar concentrations in shoot tips, lateralbuds on intact plants and lateral buds on plants decapitated24 h earlier. The effects of applied ABA suggested that it might be involvedin the mechanism of correlative inhibition in Pisum sativum,but it was not possible to test this hypothesis by determiningendogenous ABA levels in axillary buds because of their smallsize. The evidence presented here suggests that ABA is not acorrelative inhibitor in Phaseolus vulgaris even though at highconcentration it can inhibit the growth of axillary buds.     

Low temperature exotherms of winter buds of hardy conifers

Differential thermal analysis (DTA) of winter buds and the excisedprimordial shoots of sub-alpine or sub-cold firs revealed thatthese buds had all low temperature exotherms around –30?C.However, no low temperature exotherm below –15?C was detectedin the spring buds. In the winter bud of Abies firma, a temperatefir native to Japan, a low temperature exotherm was detectedaround –20?C, which is higher by 10?C than that of sub-alpineor sub-cold firs. The low temperature exotherms of these firsoccurred at nearly the same temperatures that result in thedeath of these primordial shoots. On the other hand, littleor no low temperature exotherm was detected in the winter budsof sub-cold spruces. In larch winter buds, numerous small exothermswere observed, which are probably due to the many leaf primordiain the buds. Unlike many temperate deciduous broad-leaved trees,no low temperature exotherm was detected below –15?C inwinter twig xylem of conifers such as Abies, Picea, Pinus, Larixand Pseudotsuga. Thus, very hardy coniferous twigs can tolerateextracellular freezing to –70?C. ¹ Contribution No. 1907 from the Institute of Low TemperatureScience. (Received June 8, 1978; )     

Determinate Floral Buds of Plantain (Musa AAB) as a Site of Adventitious Shoot Formation

Floral buds of the ‘False Horn’ plantain clonesMusa (AAB) ‘Harton Verde’, ‘Harton Negra’,and ‘Currare’ terminate in a large single floralstructure. The apices of these floral buds are here designatedas determinate since they have lost the ability to produce additionalfloral initials or buds. Terminal peduncle segments can be culturedin a modified Murashige and Skoog (1962) medium supplementedwith N⁶-benzyl-aminopurine (5 mg I^–1). Under these conditions,this apparent inability to yield buds can be overcome as vegetativeshoot clusters form in the axils of the bracts. Rooted plantletsare obtainable by treating shoots with naphthaleneacetic acid(1 mg I^–1) and activated charcoal (0.025%). The adventitiousorigin of the shoots has been established. Musa cultivars, plantains, floral bud, adventitious buds, tissue culture     

The Influence of Cotyledons in Axillary and Adventitious Shoot Production from Cotyledonary Nodes of Cucumis sativus L. (Cucumber)

Cucumber explants including at least part of the cotyledon,a short section of hypocotyl, and the apical bud, are capableof producing multiple axillary buds from the seedling apex andadventitious shoots from the hypocotyl base in a medium whichcontains 2·0 mg dm^–3 of kinetin. Removal of theapical bud triples the number of shoots produced from the apexof explants with two intact cotyledons but does not affect shootproduction from explants with some or all of their cotyledonsremoved. The area of intact cotyledon also influences morphogenesis,as explants with both cotyledons removed, failed to produceadventitious shoots from the hypocotyl base. Culture in continuousdarkness entirely prevents shoot development from the explantbase, but has little influence on shoot production from theapex. The influence of endogenous growth regulators and apicaldominance on the morphogenesis of shoots in cucumber seedlingsare discussed. Key words: Cucumber, cotyledons, apical dominance, morphogenesis, adventitious shoots, Cucumis sativus     

Effect of Abscisic Acid and Other Plant Hormones on Growth of Apical and Lateral Buds of Seedlings

The effect of abscisic acid (AbA) on the growth of lateral and apical buds was studied in seedlings of Pisum sativum and some other species. The hormone was applied in three different ways: 1) directly to the lateral bud on the second node of decapitated pea seedlings as 5 μI droplets in an ethanolic solution; 2) to the cut surface of decapitated seedlings: 3) to the apical bud of intact plants. AbA directly applied in amounts of 5 to 0.1 μg to the lateral bud of the second node of decapitated seedlings had a strong inhibitory effect on the bud. Application to the cut surface of seedlings decapitated about 5 mm above the second node resulted in slight inhibition of the lateral bud on the second node and in growth promotion of the bud on the first node. When AbA at 10 to 0.1 μg was applied to the apical bud of intact seedlings, the growth of this bud was inhibited but the lateral buds grew out. It is concluded that the release of the lateral buds from apícal dominance is the result of the inhibitory effect of AbA on growth of the apical bud and of low transport of AbA. This conclusion is supported by application of GA₃ and IAA, individually and each combined with AbA.     

Morphological Analysis of Tillering in Agropyron spicatum and Agropyron desertorum

The caespitose grasses Agropyron spicatum and Agropyron desertorumexhibit a striking difference in tillering response followingexperimental clipping treatment, with plants of A. desertorumproducing up to 18 times more tillers. The two species are similarin many aspects of their phenology and physiology. Previousexamination of current photosynthate production and levels ofstored carbohydrates indicate only slight differences betweenthe species. The possible role of three anatomical/morphologicalconstraints in controlling tillering was examined. No evidencefor such constraints was found. A basal cluster of buds is presenton the parent tillers. The mean bud number per tiller was similarfor both species and the range (3–9) was identical. Nearlyall of the bud apical meristems appeared anatomically viablethroughout the growing season and vascular development occurredto within 250 to 490 µm of the various bud apices of bothspecies. Both normal fall tillers and summer tillers producedunder clipping treatment originated from the largest, most distalbuds of the basal cluster of buds. However, precocious, morphologicallydistinctive, second-order tillers occasionally grew out fromthe smaller, most basal buds of some elongating fall tillers. Agropyron spicatum, Agropyron desertorum, bluebunch wheatgrass, crested wheatgrass, bud, tiller, tillering ability, meristematic potential, vascular development, regrowth     

Topophysis affects the Potential of Axillary Bud Growth, Fresh Biomass Accumulation and Specific Fresh Weight in Single-stem Roses (Rosa hybrida L.)

Topophysis, the effect on growth and differentiation of positionof axillary buds along the shoot, was studied by propagatingfive-leaflet-leaf single-node cuttings which were excised fromseven stem positions and grown as single stemmed plants. InRosahybrida ‘Korokis’ Kiss®, ‘Tanettahn’Manhattan Blue®, and ‘Sweet Promise’ Sonia®,following release of the buds from apical dominance by excision,morphogenetic development was studied until anthesis. The timefrom excision/planting until onset of bud growth, visible flowerbud appearance, and anthesis was generally shorter in plantsoriginating from apical bud positions than from basipetal positions.Topophysis mainly affected the onset of axillary bud growth;the earliest growth and development was found in cuttings fromthe second uppermost node position. This node tended to havethe lowest plastochron value, which indicated the existenceof a transition between sylleptic and proleptic buds. Stem lengthat visible flower bud and at anthesis generally increased asthe cutting position changed basipetally until the second lowestposition, and the number of five-leaflet-leaves at anthesisand the total number of nodes generally increased basipetally.For internode length, growth rate, and fresh biomass efficiencythe cuttings taken from the uppermost and lowermost positionsgenerally had significantly lower values than cuttings fromall medial positions. At anthesis, plants originating from cuttingsexcised from lower medial positions generally had a higher freshweight, greater flower stem diameter, and a significantly higherspecific fresh weight than those plants originating from apicalor basal positions. Among the cultivars, Sonia was the mostefficient in increasing fresh biomass and had the highest growthrate, whereas Manhattan Blue possessed the highest specificfresh weight, indicating a higher plant quality. It is suggestedthat topophysis inRosa is an independent phenomenon intrinsicto the axillary bud. apical dominance; axillary bud growth; fresh biomass accumulation; cut rose; flowering; Rosaceae; Rosa hybrida L.; rose; shoot growth; single-stem roses; specific fresh weight; topophysis; quality     

Callus, Organogenesis and Plantlet Formation in Tissue Cultures of Clitoria ternatea

Decoated seeds of Clitoria ternatea L. germinated on Murashigeand Skoog (Physiologia Plantarum 1962, 15, 473–97) basalmedium (BM) and differentiated callus and bipolar embryoids(two-step method) in low frequency. Calluses developed on lateralroots [BM+KN(0.1 mg 1^–1)], on roots and hypocotyls [BM+KN(0.5mg 1^–1)], and on roots [BM+KN+IAA (0.5 mg 1^–1 ofeach)]. On basal medium with KN (0.5 mg 1^–1) and withKN+IAA (0.5 mg1^–1 of each), multiple shoot buds and embryoids(one-step method) were differentiated directly on split hypocotylsand roots. In the former, shoot buds developed even on unsplithypocotyls. Rhizogenesis on isolated shoot buds occurred efficientlyin BM+indole butyric acid (IBA 0.1 mg 1^–1) and BM+IAA(0.1 mg 1^–1 and 0.5 mg 1^–1). Profuse direct embryoidsand shoot buds developing on root systems are interesting morphogeneticphenomena rarely reported. Clitoria ternatea L., callus, embryoids, multiple shoot buds, regeneration     

Apical Dominance Control in Ipomoea nil: The Influence of the Shoot Apex, Leaves and Stem

The outgrowth of lateral buds is known to be controlled by theupper shoot tissues, which include the apex, the young leavesand the upper stem. An analysis of the influence of these plantparts on axillary bud elongation in Ipomoea nil was carriedout by various treatments on these specific tissues. A restriction of elongation in the main shoot due to eitherdecapitation or shoot inversion resulted in the release of apicaldominance A non-linear type of compensating growth relationshipwas observed between the 13 cm apical growing region of thestem and the lateral buds. It was determined by decapitation,defoliation and AgNO₃ treatments that both the 13 cm stem-growthregion and the young leaves (1–5 cm in length) had a muchgreater inhibitory influence on the outgrowth of specified lateralbuds than did the stem apex (consisting of the terminal 0.5cm of the shoot). The specified lateral buds which were analyzedfor outgrowth were located a number of nodes below the shootapex. The intervening nodes were debudded. Although the importanceof young leaves in the control of apical dominance has beenpreviously recognized, the most significant result from thepresent study with Ipomoea was the strong influence of the 13cm apical growth region of the stem on the out growth of thelateral buds. Apical dominance, Ipomoea nil L., Pharbitis nil, growth region, lateral bud outgrowth, decapitation, defoliation, shoot inversion     

In Vitro Culture and Plant Regeneration in Vicia faba subsp. Equina (var. Spring Blaze)

Explants of stem, leaves, roots, and cotyledons from etiolatedaxenically grown Vicia faba seedlings were cultured on a rangeof media. Shoot organogenesis was only obtained with nodal stemand cotyledonary node explants when cultured on MS medium with3% sucrose, 2.0 mg 1^–1 BAP and 02 mg 1^–1 NAA. Callusproliferation accompanied shoot organogenesis from nodal stemexplants. Successive subculture of nodal stem callus resultedin proliferation of regenerative callus which contained severalshoot bud initials. The capacity for shoot regeneration fromthis callus was maintained for 9 months. Histological studiesreveal de novo formation of meristematic centres in callus andtheir further development into bud primordia. High frequencyrooting of these adventitious shoots was obtained on half-strengthMS medium with 1.5% sucrose, 0.1 mg 1^–1 NAA and 0.5 mg1^–1 kinetin. Key words: Vicia faba, adventitious shoots, axillary shoots, de novomeristem formation, organogenesis, tissue culture     

Regeneration from Rhizome Fragments of Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. III. Effects of Nitrogen and Temperature on the Development of Dominance Amongst Shoots on Multi-node Fragments

Not all buds developed equally when 7-node rhizome fragmentsof Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. were incubated in the dark at23 °C. Instead, after an initial flush of several shoots,buds were inhibited in a highly ordered sequence to leave onlyone dominant shoot growing. Applying an exogenous supply ofnitrogen KNO₃) early during this sequence increased the meanshoot lengths and delayed the onset of dominance. Additionally,the application of nitrogen after eight days incubation alteredthe sequence of shoot growth such that, in some instances, smallrapidly-growing basal shoots ‘dominated’ largerand more slowly-growing apical ones. Dominance (correlativeinhibition) was maintained in untreated fragments for up to383 days Numbers of active budsand shoot extensionrate weremaximal intherange 13°to 23 °C where dominance was establishedwithin 30 days. Incontrast only 6 per cent of rhizome fragmentskept at 33 °C had dominant shoots after 65 days. At 3 °Cshoot growth was so slow that dominance was not permanentlyestablished within 150 days. Numbers ofactive budsand shoot extensionrate weremaximal intherange 13° to 23°C where dominance was establishedwithin 30 days. Incontrast only 6 per cent of rhizome fragmentskept at 33 °C had dominant shoots after 65 days. At 3 °Cshoot growth was so slow that dominance was not permanentlyestablished within 150 days It is suggested that the effects of nitrogenand temperatureon dominance in multi-noderhizome fragments can be interpretedin terms of competition for nutrients between shoots, and theantagonistic effects of nitrogen on an auxin-mediated inhibitionby the dominant shoot.     

Correlative Bud Inhibition and Abscisic Acid in Acer pseudoplatanus and Syringa vulgaris

Growing shoots of Acer pseudoplatanus and Syringa vulgairs were decapitated and defoliated (“treated”) in June 1972–1975. During the 2–3 weeks after treatment the contents of abscisic acid (ABA) in the out-growing lateral buds at the upper-most node as well as in the petiole stumps and nodes were determined by means of gas-liquid chromatography. The concentration of ABA in lateral buds of intact shoots, calculated on a fresh weight basis, varied greatly from year but was consistently several times higher than in petioles and nodes. Defoliation and decapitation caused out-growth of the lateral buds. This was accompanied by a sharp decrease in the ABA concentration, which finally reached the level of petiole tissue. The concentration of ABA in controls (“untreated”) decreased also, but to a smaller extent, and remained higher than in petioles. In petioles and nodes of treated as well as of untreated shoots, the ABA concentration did not change. The absolute amount of ABA in the buds of treated shoots after 2–3 weeks varied greatly, but was apparently not different from the amount in buds of untreated controls or in buds at the beginning of the experiment. Therefore, the decrease of the ABA concentration was mainly due to fresh weight increase. The results are discussed in relation to a possible role of ABA in correlative bud inhibition.     

Cytokinin/Auxin Control of Apical Dominance in Ipomoea nil

Although the concept of apical dominance control by the ratioof cytokinin to auxin is not new, recent experimentation withtransgenic plants has given this concept renewed attention.In the present study, it has been demonstrated that cytokinintreatments can partially reverse the inhibitory effect of auxinon lateral bud outgrowth in intact shoots of Ipomoea nil. Althoughless conclusive, this also appeared to occur in buds of isolatednodes. Auxin inhibited lateral bud outgrowth when applied eitherto the top of the stump of the decapitated shoot or directlyto the bud itself. However, the fact that cytokinin promotiveeffects on bud outgrowth are known to occur when cytokinin isapplied directly to the bud suggests different transport tissuesand/or sites of action for the two hormones. Cytokinin antagonistswere shown in some experiments to have a synergistic effectwith benzyladenine on the promotion of bud outgrowth. If theratio of cytokinin to auxin does control apical dominance, thenthe next critical question is how do these hormones interactin this correlative process? The hypothesis that shoot-derivedauxin inhibits lateral bud outgrowth indirectly by depletingcytokinin content in the shoots via inhibition of its productionin the roots was not supported in the present study which demonstratedthat the repressibility of lateral bud outgrowth by auxin treatmentsat various positions on the shoot was not correlated with proximityto the roots but rather with proximity to the buds. Resultsalso suggested that auxin in subtending mature leaves as wellas that in the shoot apex and adjacent small leaves may contributeto the apical dominance of a shoot. (Received September 24, 1996; Accepted March 16, 1997)