Utility of imprint cytology for early presumptive diagnosis in clinically suspicious cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of imprint cytology (IC) in providing an early presumptive diagnosis of clinically suspected cervical carcinoma. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 219 clinically suspicious cervical cancer cases underwent Pap test, punch biopsy and IC at the same sitting. Correlations were performed between these diagnostic modalities to determine the sensitivity and specificity of IC in diagnosis of cervical cancer. RESULTS: The overall accuracy of IC in detecting cervical cancers was 96.2%. About 78% of squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), 60% of adenocarcinomas and 100% of small cell carcinoma could be accurately typed on imprints. Twelve malignant lesions were diagnosed on IC among 26 unsatisfactory biopsies. Although there was no false positive result, 3.5% false negative diagnoses were given on IC. The sensitivity and specificity of imprint smear cytology to detect malignancy was 96.2% and 100%. Agreement between imprint cytology and Pap smear diagnosis of malignancy was 95.3%. kappa Statistics revealed excellent agreement between imprints and biopsies and between imprints and Pap smears in diagnosis of malignant lesions. CONCLUSION: IC can be used as an adjunctive technique for an early and reliable preliminary presumptive diagnosis of cancer of the uterine cervix.     

Diagnostic value of nucleolar organizer regions (AgNORs) in brush biopsies of suspicious lesions of the oral cavity.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective study was to report on the diagnostic accuracy of AgNOR-analysis as an adjunctive diagnostic tool of conventional oral exfoliative cytology taken from suspicious lesions in our clinic. STUDY DESIGN: Cytological diagnoses obtained from brush biopsies of macroscopically suspicious lesions of the oral mucosa from 75 patients (final diagnoses: 53 histologically proven squamous cell carcinomas, 11 leukoplakias and other inflammatory oral lesions) and from 11 patients with normal mucosa as a negative control group were compared with histological and/or clinical follow-ups. Five smears were doubtful and seven suspicious for tumor cells in the cytologic report. Number of AgNOR's were counted in 100 squamous epithelial cell-nuclei per slide after silver-restaining. RESULTS: Sensitivity of our cytological diagnosis alone on oral smears for the detection of squamous carcinomas was 92.5%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value was 100% and negative 84.6%. The best cut-off value of the mean number of AgNOR dots per nucleus distinguishing benign from malignant cells was 4.8. The percentage of nuclei with more than three AgNORs had a cut-off level of 70%. Applying these methods to twelve doubtful or suspicious cytological diagnoses we were able to correctly establish the diagnosis of malignancy in ten cases of histologically proven cancers and to reveal benignity in two histologically proven cases. Thus we achieved a positive and negative predictive value of 100% each. CONCLUSIONS: Smears from brushings of visible oral lesions, if clinically considered as suspicious for cancer, are an easily practicable, non-invasive, painless, safe and accurate screening method for detection of oral cancerous lesions. We conclude that AgNOR-analysis may be a useful adjunct to other methods in routine cytological diagnosis of oral cancer that can help to solve cytologically suspicious or doubtful cases.     

The preparation of additional smears from a cervical scrape: impact on the rate of detection of cervical neoplasia

The preparation of additional smears from a cervical scrape: impact on the rate of detection of cervical neoplasia It has been known for some time that only a proportion of the cells on the smear-taking device is transferred to the slide. This can give rise to errors in reporting although the smear may have been taken correctly. This study was undertaken to identify a quick and simple method of improving the accuracy of the Papanicolaou test. A conventional smear and five additional smears were obtained from 62 women attending a Genito-Urinary Medicine clinic. The cell content of the conventional smears and the additional smears was compared. Dyskaryotic cells were detected both in the conventional smear and in the first and second additional smears from 22 women. Dyskaryotic cells were detected in the first and second additional smears only in five women. Thus, the conventional smear failed to detect biopsy-confirmed cervical abnormality in these women. A cell count of the first additional smear in the five cases where the conventional smear was negative showed that they contained, on average, 310 dyskaryotic cells. The preparation of one additional cervical smear per cervical scrape could significantly increase the accuracy of the cervical smear test by 11% (P=0.025, McNemar's test).     

Comparison of smears and cell blocks in the fine needle aspiration diagnosis of recurrent gynecologic malignancies.

A retrospective, seven-year study was conducted to evaluate the value of cell blocks as an adjunct to smears in the fine needle aspiration (FNA) diagnosis of recurrent gynecologic malignancies. Eighty-four FNAs were performed on patients with previously diagnosed malignancies of the cervix (39 cases), ovary (27), uterus (14), vulva (2) and vagina (2). Material for the preparation of cell blocks was available in all cases. Smears and cell blocks were reviewed separately, and the findings were categorized as positive, negative, suspicious or unsatisfactory. Identical smear and cell block results were reported in 71 (84.5%) of the 84 cases (45 positive, 20 negative, 1 suspicious and 5 unsatisfactory). In 12 cases (14.3%) the smear was superior to the cell block in detecting malignant cells; while all 12 smears were positive, 8 cell blocks were negative, and 4 were suspicious. In no case was the cell block positive with a negative smear; in one (1.2%) the cell block was positive and the smear suspicious. The results of this study indicate that the additional study of cell blocks is of little benefit in the FNA cytodiagnosis of recurrent disease in patients with documented gynecologic malignancies.     

Quality assurance in cervical smears: 100% rapid rescreening vs. 10% random rescreening

OBJECTIVE: To compare 100% rapid rescreening of cervical smears with 10% random rescreening as a method of quality assurance. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 5215 smears, randomly selected from smears reported as negative by cytotechnologists during routine screening, underwent 100% rapid rescreening by senior cytotechnologists. Ten percent of these smears, selected at random, were rescreened by other senior cytotechnologists. The gold standard was defined by cytopathologists, who rescreened all 5215 smears. After excluding unsatisfactory smears detected by cytopathologists, 4271 were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The 100% rapid rescreening method identified 69.9%, 95.7% and 100%, respectively, of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cases reported by the cytopathologists. The 100% rapid rescreening method showed a sensitivity of 73.5% and specificity of 98.6%. The 10% rescreening method showed sensitivity of 40.9% and specificity of 98.8%. CONCLUSION: One hundred percent rapid rescreening is an efficient method of internal quality assurance in cervical smear diagnosis. It can reduce the false negative rate and therefore can provide greater certainty to women who have received negative results. Well-trained cytotechnologists are able to identify abnormal smears in 1-minute rapid rescreening.     

Liquid-based cytology and conventional smears compared over two 12-month periods.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Liquid based cytology (LBC) was introduced across the Scottish Cervical Screening Programme in 2003-2004. The objective of this study was to compare in a large cytopathology laboratory the results of cervical samples over two twelve-month periods, 2001-2002, when the great majority of smears were conventional, with 2003-2004, when all were LBC. METHODS: The results of smears in both periods were analysed to give overall reporting profiles, and correlated with results of cervical biopsies. The numbers of patients referred for colposcopy were compared. RESULTS: The percentage of unsatisfactory smears fell from 13.6% to 1.9%. Colposcopic referrals for repeated unsatisfactory smears fell from almost 25% to 0.5%. There was a decrease in overall smear numbers, but despite this there was an increase in the number of smears reported as showing dyskaryosis of any grade. There was an increase in positive predictive value for moderate dyskaryosis and above, from 79.5% to 86.1%. The outcome of biopsies from patients referred with mild dyskaryosis showed no decrease in accuracy of predicting a low grade histological lesion. Workload in the laboratory decreased, due to fewer smears received overall, more rapid primary screening times and fewer multi-slide cases. Primary screening backlogs all but disappeared, and reporting times greatly improved. CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of liquid based cytology led to improvements in unsatisfactory smear rates, with significant benefits to colposcopic referrals and laboratory turnaround times. Pick-up rates of dyskaryosis were maintained, and the positive predictive value of a dyskaryotic smear report was improved.     

Estimating the sensitivity of cervical cytology: errors of interpretation and test limitations

The objective of this study was to estimate: (i) the sensitivity of cytologists in recognizing abnormal smears; (ii) the sensitivity of cervical cytology as a method of detecting abnormal smears among those obtained in the presence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Study subjects were 61 women with a histologically confirmed CIN identified through colpohistological and cytologic screening. For objective (i) new smears were taken from study subjects just before treatment, mixed with routine preparations, interpreted by unaware cytologists and then blindly reviewed by a group of three expert supervisors, who reached a consensus diagnosis. Cytologists classified as positive for squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) 30 of the 34 smears judged as positive by supervisors (100% of smears classified as high-grade and 67% of smears classified as low-grade SIL by the supervisors). Our approach, based on creating a set of smears with a high a priori probability of being positive, proved to be an efficient way of estimating errors of interpretation. For objective (ii), smears taken at the moment of diagnosis, just before biopsy, were also reviewed by the same supervisors. These CIN cases were identified among asymptomatic women independently of cytological findings and results are therefore not subject to verification bias. Among the 33 histological CINII/III, four (12%) smears had no atypical cells (three negatives and one unsatisfactory) at review. The same proportion was 26% (four negatives and one unsatisfactory) among the 19 histological CINI. No significant differences in smear content were found between the seven ‘false negatives’ and a sample of ‘true positives’ and ‘true negatives’ for a number of formal adequacy criteria (including presence of endocervical cells). Strong differences were found between positive smears taken just before biopsy and those taken just before treatment (in 11 women the first smear only was positive, while the opposite was never observed), suggesting an effect of punch biopsy in removing lesions.     

Accuracy of thin-layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of thin-layer cytology with Autocyte PREP (TriPath Imaging Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) with conventional smears in 500 women undergoing cervical cone biopsy. STUDY DESIGN: The study was performed among 500 consecutive women presenting for cone biopsy for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on biopsy in 350 (70%) and discrepant cytology/colpohistology in 150 (30%). Before performing a cone biopsy, two cervical samples were collected for conventional smears and thin-layer cytologic slides, with randomization of the order. Conventional smears were stained and diagnosed at Pasteur Cerba, while thin-layer cytologic slides were processed at a local TriPath office (Meylan, France) and sent in a masked fashion for screening at Pasteur Cerba. Any slides initially read as normal were reviewed again and reported without knowledge of the other cytologic or cone biopsy data. The final cytologic diagnoses for the two methods were compared with histopathology of the cone biopsy. RESULTS: The conventional smear was unsatisfactory in 58 (11.6%) of cases, while there were 4 (0.8%) unsatisfactory thin-layer cytologic slides (P < .001). Endocervical cells were missing from 31 (6.2%) of conventional smears and 34 (6.8%) of thin-layer cytologic slides. For the pooled data, sensitivities of conventional smear and thin layer for detecting high grade CIN (0.82% and 0.86%, respectively) were similar as were specificities (0.40% and 0.43%, respectively). When first samples were compared, the sensitivities of the conventional smear and thin layer for high grade CIN were 0.79% and 0.89%, respectively (P = .02), with corresponding specificities of 0.41% and 0.36% (P < .01). CONCLUSION: When controlled for sample order, the sensitivity of thin-layer cytology for detecting high grade CIN was significantly higher than that of conventional smears in patients with previous abnormal cytology, but at the expense of specificity.     

Review of cervical smears from 76 women with invasive cervical cancer: cytological findings and medicolegal implications

OBJECTIVE: To review cervical smears from 76 women which were taken prior to the diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer and to determine the appropriateness of the cytology reports issued on the smears. METHODS: Cervical smears, clinical records, cervical smear history and cytology reports from 76 women with invasive cervical cancer were reviewed. After microscopic review of the cervical smears, the cases were divided into two groups: Group 1 comprised 50 women who were found to have had at least one false-negative (F/N) smear report prior to the diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer. Group 2 comprised 26 women for whom no evidence of F/N reporting was found. RESULTS: A total of 209 cervical smears from the 50 women in group 1 were available for review (range 2-12 smears per woman); 100 of the 209 smears were considered to have been reported appropriately. Ninety-seven smears which had been reported originally as negative or inadequate were found, on review, to contain numerous severely dyskaryotic cells and were reclassified as F/N smears. All of the 50 women had at least one F/N smear and 29 had two or more. Twelve smears from eight women contained only a few (<200 severely dyskaryotic cells). Forty women developed invasive squamous carcinoma and 10 developed invasive adenocarcinoma. The stage at diagnosis ranged from 1A to stage 4. Seventy-one smears from the 24 women in group 2 were available for review (range 1-15 smears per woman). In two cases included in group 2, no smears were provided for review as the smears had been lost or mislaid. Review of the 71 smears confirmed the accuracy of the original cytological classification of the smear. Nineteen women were diagnosed with squamous cancer, two microinvasive cancer, one glassy cell, two adenocarcinomas, and one with adenosquamous carcinoma. One women was found to have an embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the corpus uteri involving the cervix. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The medicolegal implications are discussed in the light of the above findings. Evidence of breach of duty of care was presented in all 50 cases in group I although causation was not established in every case. There was no evidence of failure of duty of care in terms of the standard of the cervical cytology reports issued or standard of clinical management in 17 of the 26 cases in group 2. However, in seven of the 26 cases in group 2, clinical management of the case was substandard due to failure to investigate symptoms of irregular bleeding regardless of a negative cytology report (two cases), failure to act upon a suspicious smear report or consecutive inadequate smear reports (two cases), failure of follow-up after treatment of CIN3 (two cases) and histological misdiagnosis (one case).     

Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smear and SurePath® liquid-based cytology in the Copenhagen population screening programme for cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE: To compare diagnostic performance of conventional Papanicolaou smear with SurePath liquid-based cytology in a population screening programme. METHODS: A retrospective comparison was performed on data from two 18-month periods of the screening programme for cervical cancer in the municipality of Copenhagen with conventional Papanicolaou technique (n = 82,116) and liquid-based cytology (n = 84,414). RESULTS: After the conversion to liquid-based cytology the percentage of unsatisfactory samples decreased from 2.3% to 0.3% (P < 0.001), whereas the number of normal cervical samples lacking an endocervical component increased from 8.5% to 8.9% (P < 0.005). The percentage of samples with atypical cells and cells suspicious for malignancy increased from 3% to 4.2% (P < 0.001) and from 1.9% to 2.4% (P < 0.001), respectively. The subsequent histological follow-up showed normal findings decreased from 70.5% to 68.9% and from 28.0% to 26.1%, respectively. However, in relation to the entire screening populations, there was an increase of normal findings from 2.12% to 2.89% after primary atypical diagnosis and from 0.53% to 0.62% after diagnosis of suspicious cells after conversion to the liquid-based technique. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the number of unsatisfactory samples to be significantly reduced with the liquid-based technique. The data suggest that there is an increased detection rate of cervical precancerous lesions with liquid-based cytology, but the number of false positive tests is still high. The specificity of the two tests seems similar, but this cannot be ascertained exactly, because of the fact that follow-up of negative cases is unavailable.     

The inadequate smear: does it matter?

The objective of this study was to quantify the incidence of underlying cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) among women referred for colposcopy with three consecutive inadequate smears. The design was a retrospective cohort study analysing data from a regional colposcopy database at Cervical Screening Wales. Women who were referred to all the colposcopy clinics in Wales with three consecutive inadequate smears, the third inadequate smear being taken between 1 April 2001 and 31 March 2002 constituted the study population. The results of the fourth smear taken at the colposcopy clinic after three consecutive inadequate smears, the worst biopsy results from any of the subsequent colposcopies and the relationship between the result of the fourth smear taken at colposcopy clinic and any histology result were the main outcome measures. The accuracy of the colposcopic opinion was also examined. Of the 433 women identified as having been referred because of three consecutive inadequate smears, 302 were linked to either a subsequent smear and/or a biopsy result. An adequate smear result was available for 85% of these women when the smear was taken in the colposcopy clinic; 77% were reported as negative and 8% were abnormal. Of the 347 women seen in the colposcopy clinic, high-grade CIN was seen in 3% and low-grade lesion in 8%. The sensitivity and specificity of the fourth inadequate smear test in predicting underlying CIN were 15% and 84% respectively, with a positive predictive value of 8%. The sensitivity and specificity of colposcopy in predicting histological CIN among patients with three inadequate smears was 70% and 49%, respectively, and the positive predictive value was 44%. This study raises the question as to whether three consecutive inadequate smears should be considered as an indication for colposcopy, or merely for a further smear to be taken in circumstances where there is a greater likelihood getting an adequate result.     

How predictive is a cervical smear suggesting invasive squamous cell carcinoma?

How predictive is a cervical smear suggesting invasive squamous cell carcinoma? Features have been described in severely dyskaryotic cervical smears that suggest frankly invasive or microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma. These are reported in three separate categories in our department. The aim of the current study was to assess the positive predictive value of these categories for invasive disease on histology. All smears reported in these categories over a five year period were correlated with the histology results. 527 smears were assessed. The positive predictive value of a smear suggesting frank invasion was 55.7% for all invasive squamous carcinomas and 40% for stage IB or above. Smears suspicious of invasion or microinvasion predicted invasive disease in 22.3% and 17.2%, respectively, most carcinomas being stage IA. Invasive squamous cell carcinoma may be predicted to a limited degree by cervical cytology especially when the smear suggests frank invasion.     

An Audit of Cervical Cancer Deaths In Nottingham

Death certificates were reviewed and 57 women were identified whose primary cause of death was cervical cancer. Their cervical smear records were reviewed from laboratory files. Only nine had participated in the cervical cancer screening programme before the diagnosis of cervical cancer was made. One woman had an abnormal smear as a result of cervical screening but failed to attend for follow-up.
The problem of false negative smears is also addressed and the value of review of negative smears for the purposes of cytology audit is emphasized.     

The Cardiff Cervical Cytology Study: prevalence of cytological grades and initial histological findings.

Among 45 266 women in the Cardiff Cervical Cytology Survey the peak prevalence of suspicious or positive smears was 11.2/1000 at age 45-50 years and of dyskaryosis 10.2/1000 at age 25-29. A suspicious or positive cytological picture at prevalence testing was associated with occult or clinical invasion in 24% of cases, and only 4% of patients with suspicious or positive smears were normal histologically. When dyskaryosis was detected in the prevalence test 20% had carcinoma in situ or microinvasion and 3% had occult or clinically invasive carcinoma. One hundred and twenty-nine (51%) women with dyskaryotic smears did not have a biopsy initially (that is, within two years of the prevalence test), but they were followed up at regular intervals. Subsequently 15 of the 129 gave smears consistently dyskaryotic or worse cytologically and were subjected to biopsy. Of these, two showed dysplasia, 12 carcinoma in situ, and one clinically invasive carcinoma. These findings emphasise the need for repeat cytological or histological examination in any woman with evidence of dyskaryosis in a cervical smear.     

Cervex brush versus vaginal–cervical–endocervical (VCE) triple smear techniques in cervical sampling

Cervex brush versus vaginal–cervical–endocervical (VCE) triple smear techniques in cervical sampling
Cervex brush sampling was compared with the conventional triple vaginal–cervical–endocervical (VCE) smear technique. Nine hundred and fifty‐nine Cervex brush smears and 1064 VCE smears were studied. All smears with both methods were technically satisfactory for evaluation. Endocervical cells were found in 90.7% and metaplastic cells in 73.3% of Cervex brush samples and in 92.5% and 64.1% of VCE samples, respectively. There were significantly more metaplastic cells in smears from premenopausal women. Low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) was found in three Cervex brush samples and in two VCE samples. High‐grade SIL was found only in one Cervex brush sample. Benign cellular changes were found in 142 Cervex brush samples and in 144 VCE samples. Sampling with the Cervex brush is efficient, simple and fast and gives high quality cervical smears for cytological evaluation.     

Clinical value of repeat Pap smear at the time of colposcopy

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical value of a repeat (second) Pap smear at the time of colposcopy in the management of patients with recent cytologic abnormalities. STUDY DESIGN: A study of paired Pap smears and their corresponding cervical biopsies during a two-year period, commencing in June 1996, was undertaken. Pap smears and cervical biopsies from 614 patients were evaluated in the Department of Pathology, Royal Darwin Hospital, Northern Territory, Australia. To maintain uniformity, the cytologic and histologic findings were assessed according to the Bethesda System. RESULTS: The original (first) Pap smears included 288 high grade and 326 low grade lesions. The second smears showed 200 high grade, 221 low grade, 167 normal and 26 unsatisfactory cases. Punch biopsies revealed 242 high grade, 300 low grade and 72 inflammatory/reactive lesions. The changes noted in the second Pap smears and in the punch biopsies in the group originally diagnosed as having high grade disease were generally less advanced. The second Pap smears and corresponding cervical punch biopsies showed more advanced changes in the group originally diagnosed as having low grade disease. Removal of part of the abnormal epithelium during the first Pap smear and the desire of the colposcopist not to damage the surface epithelium prior to performing a cervical biopsy may account for some of these findings. Sampling errors and morphological misinterpretation may explain some of the findings. CONCLUSION: In the second smears, new cases of high grade abnormality were discovered mainly in patients with low grade changes on the first smears. Therefore, a second Pap smear at the time of colposcopy is justifiable in the group with low grade changes on the first smear.     

The diagnostic value of on-site cytopathological evaluation and cell block preparation in fine-needle aspiration cytology of liver masses

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to evaluate the typing accuracy of conventional smear (CS), cell block (CB) preparations and combined use of both procedures (CS + CB) for the diagnosis of hepatic malignancies and to determine whether immediate on-site cytopathological evaluation improves the diagnostic yield of liver fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). METHODS: Ultrasound-guided FNABs were performed on 323 consecutive cases with liver masses between December 2002 and December 2004. Histologically and/or clinically correlated 167 cases were included in the study. Preliminary FNAB results, results of CS, CB, and combined use of CS and CB were compared regarding diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the diagnosis of malignancy. Subtyping accuracies of different methods were also compared. RESULTS: The sensitivity of on-site cytopathological examination and CS were both 92.8%. The sensitivity of CS + CB was slightly better than that of CB (93.5% versus 84.8%). Specificity of all procedures was achieved 100%. Diagnostic accuracy of on-site cytopathological evaluation, CS, CB, and CS + CB were 93.9%, 93.9%, 87.2%, and 94.5%, respectively. A specific subtype diagnosis of malignant tumours could be rendered accurately on the basis of preliminary diagnosis in 71%, CS in 75.4%, CB in 78.3% and combined approach in 92% of cases. In terms of typing accuracy, 87.5% of HCCs, 93.2% of adenocarcinomas, 92.3% of neuroendocrine carcinomas, 100% of lymphomas and 100% of other malignant tumours were correctly subclassified in the final cytopathological diagnosis. The agreement between preliminary diagnosis and final cytopathological diagnosis was 77.2%. CONCLUSION: With use of on-site cytopathological evaluation and combined use of CS and CB, the diagnostic accuracy of liver tumours approaches 100% and also significantly improve diagnostic and subtyping accuracy of liver malignancies.     

Significance of high-risk human papillomavirus detection by polymerase chain reaction in primary cervical cancer screening

The purposes of this study were to evaluate the incidence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and to assess its diagnostic usefulness in primary cervical screening. PCR testing for HPV type 16, 18, 31 and 33 was performed on 1305 specimens obtained during routine cervical cancer screening. We analysed the concurrent cervical smears and biopsy, and correlated them with the HPV infection status. We also evaluated histologically-proven cases with ASCUS smears according to HPV infection. HPV DNA was identified in eight (0.7%) of 1144 cytologically normal patients; nine (10.5%) of 86 ASCUS; seven (25.0%) of 28 LSIL; 26 (78.8%) of 33 HSIL; and in all of three squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). HPV positivity was significantly associated with cytohistological diagnosis for HSIL of more. In addition, HPV-positive ASCUS cases were found to be associated with histological abnormality rather than HPV-negative. The results indicate that high-risk HPV testing by PCR could be a useful adjunct tool for Pap smear in primary cervical screening. The combination of Pap smear and high-risk HPV testing by PCR might reduce unnecessary colposcopy-guided biopsy of women with cytological diagnosis of ASCUS.     

Should the laboratory assess the sampling adequacy of cervical smears?

Should the laboratory assess the sampling adequacy of cervical smears? The results of a questionnaire answered by 14 out of the 18 NHS laboratories in Scotland reporting cervical smears showed that, since the publication of Guidelines for Judging the Adequacy of a Cervical Smear, by the British Society for Clinical Cytology (BSCC), rates of unsatisfactory smears had risen from a mean of 3.3% to 6.5%, with some laboratories reporting rates of over 10%. Four laboratories followed the guidelines closely in requiring the presence of two indicators of sampling of the transformation zone, i.e. endocervical cells, metaplastic cells or endocervical mucus. Seven laboratories required one indicator either in all smears or in a subset, whilst three did not require any indicator at all. The laboratories observing the guidelines closely had a higher mean unsatisfactory rate than those partially observing them. The main impediment to the full implementation of the BSCC guidelines appeared to be fear of an unmanageably high unsatisfactory smear rate. The accuracy of the assessment of adequacy is questioned, as is the cost effectiveness of doing so.     

Colonic cytology. A retrospective study with histopathologic correlation

Three hundred sixty cytologic specimens obtained by colonoscopic brushing from 336 patients were compared with biopsy specimens simultaneously obtained for histologic examination. Of the cytologic specimens, 160 (44%) were positive for malignant cells, 37 (10%) contained suspicious cells, 54 (15%) had atypical glandular cells, 107 were cytologically negative, and 2 were considered unsatisfactory. Eight-four percent of the patients with cytologically positive smears and 54% of those with suspicious smears had malignant neoplasms in the simultaneously obtained tissue biopsies. Of the patients with follow-up, all with cytologically positive findings and nine with suspicious findings on the initial cytologic examination and simultaneous negative tissue biopsies, were subsequently found to have carcinoma of the colon. Cytology proved to have a sensitivity of 0.73 and a specificity of 1.00 while tissue biopsy showed a sensitivity of 0.81 and a specificity of 1.00. By combining the two methods, the sensitivity increased to 0.92. It is concluded that cytologic examination of colonic brushings is a highly accurate and reliable technique for the detection of malignant neoplasms of the colon and can preempt the use of biopsy forceps.