Regulators of G Protein Signaling Attenuate the G Protein–mediated Inhibition of N-Type Ca Channels

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins bind to the α subunits of certain heterotrimeric G proteins and greatly enhance their rate of GTP hydrolysis, thereby determining the time course of interactions among Gα, Gβγ, and their effectors. Voltage-gated N-type Ca channels mediate neurosecretion, and these Ca channels are powerfully inhibited by G proteins. To determine whether RGS proteins could influence Ca channel function, we recorded the activity of N-type Ca channels coexpressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells with G protein–coupled muscarinic (m2) receptors and various RGS proteins. Coexpression of full-length RGS3T, RGS3, or RGS8 significantly attenuated the magnitude of receptor-mediated Ca channel inhibition. In control cells expressing α1B, α2, and β3 Ca channel subunits and m2 receptors, carbachol (1 μM) inhibited whole-cell currents by ∼80% compared with only ∼55% inhibition in cells also expressing exogenous RGS protein. A similar effect was produced by expression of the conserved core domain of RGS8. The attenuation of Ca current inhibition resulted primarily from a shift in the steady state dose–response relationship to higher agonist concentrations, with the EC₅₀ for carbachol inhibition being ∼18 nM in control cells vs. ∼150 nM in RGS-expressing cells. The kinetics of Ca channel inhibition were also modified by RGS. Thus, in cells expressing RGS3T, the decay of prepulse facilitation was slower, and recovery of Ca channels from inhibition after agonist removal was faster than in control cells. The effects of RGS proteins on Ca channel modulation can be explained by their ability to act as GTPase-accelerating proteins for some Gα subunits. These results suggest that RGS proteins may play important roles in shaping the magnitude and kinetics of physiological events, such as neurosecretion, that involve G protein–modulated Ca channels.     

Role of Molecular Chaperones in G Protein ��5/Regulator of G Protein Signaling Dimer Assembly and G Protein �¦� Dimer Specificity

The G protein βγ subunit dimer (Gβγ) and the Gβ5/regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) dimer play fundamental roles in propagating and regulating G protein pathways, respectively. How these complexes form dimers when the individual subunits are unstable is a question that has remained unaddressed for many years. In the case of Gβγ, recent studies have shown that phosducin-like protein 1 (PhLP1) works as a co-chaperone with the cytosolic chaperonin complex (CCT) to fold Gβ and mediate its interaction with Gγ. However, it is not known what fraction of the many Gβγ combinations is assembled this way or whether chaperones influence the specificity of Gβγ dimer formation. Moreover, the mechanism of Gβ5-RGS assembly has yet to be assessed experimentally. The current study was undertaken to directly address these issues. The data show that PhLP1 plays a vital role in the assembly of Gγ2 with all four Gβ1–4 subunits and in the assembly of Gβ2 with all twelve Gγ subunits, without affecting the specificity of the Gβγ interactions. The results also show that Gβ5-RGS7 assembly is dependent on CCT and PhLP1, but the apparent mechanism is different from that of Gβγ. PhLP1 seems to stabilize the interaction of Gβ5 with CCT until Gβ5 is folded, after which it is released to allow Gβ5 to interact with RGS7. These findings point to a general role for PhLP1 in the assembly of all Gβγ combinations and suggest a CCT-dependent mechanism for Gβ5-RGS7 assembly that utilizes the co-chaperone activity of PhLP1 in a unique way.Eukaryotic cells utilize receptors coupled to heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins (G proteins)³ to mediate a vast array of responses ranging from nutrient-induced migration of single-celled organisms to neurotransmitter-regulated neuronal activity in the human brain (1). Ligand binding to a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) initiates GTP exchange on the G protein heterotrimer (composed of Gα, Gβ, and Gγ subunits), which in turn causes the release of Gα-GTP from the Gβγ dimer (2–4). Both Gα-GTP and Gβγ propagate and amplify the signal by interacting with effector enzymes and ion channels (1, 5). The duration and amplitude of the signal is dictated by receptor phosphorylation coupled with arrestin binding and internalization (6) and by regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins, which serve as GTPase-activating proteins for the GTP-bound Gα subunit (7, 8). The G protein signaling cycle is reset as the inactive Gα-GDP reassembles with the Gβγ dimer and Gαβγ re-associates with the GPCR (5).To fulfill its essential role in signaling, the G protein heterotrimer must be assembled post-translationally from its nascent polypeptides. Significant progress has been made recently regarding the mechanism by which this process occurs. It has been clear for some time that the Gβγ dimer must assemble first, followed by subsequent association of Gα with Gβγ (9). What has not been clear was how Gβγ assembly would occur given the fact that neither Gβ nor Gγ is structurally stable without the other. An important breakthrough was the finding that phosducin-like protein 1 (PhLP1) functions as a co-chaperone with the chaperonin containing tailless complex polypeptide 1 (CCT) in the folding of nascent Gβ and its association with Gγ (10–15). CCT is an important chaperone that assists in the folding of actin and tubulin and many other cytosolic proteins, including many β propeller proteins like Gβ (16). PhLP1 has been known for some time to interact with Gβγ and was initially believed to inhibit Gβγ function (17). However, several recent studies have demonstrated that PhLP1 and CCT work together in a highly orchestrated manner to form the Gβγ dimer (10–15).Studies on the mechanism of PhLP1-mediated Gβγ assembly have focused on the most common dimer Gβ1γ2 (10, 13, 14), leaving open questions about the role of PhLP1 in the assembly of the other Gβγ combinations. These are important considerations given that humans possess 5 Gβ genes and 12 Gγ genes with some important splice variants (18, 19), resulting in more than 60 possible combinations of Gβγ dimers. Gβ1–4 share between 80 and 90% sequence identity and are broadly expressed (18, 19). Gβ5, the more atypical isoform, shares only ∼53% identity with Gβ1, carries a longer N-terminal domain, and is only expressed in the central nervous system and retina (20). The Gγ protein family is more heterogeneous than the Gβ family. The sequence identity of the 12 Gγ isoforms extends from 10 to 70% (21), and the Gγ family can be separated into 5 subfamilies (21–23). All Gγ proteins carry C-terminal isoprenyl modifications, which contribute to their association with the cell membrane, GPCRs, Gαs, and effectors (9). Subfamily I Gγ isoforms are post-translationally farnesylated, whereas all others are geranylgeranylated (22, 24).There is some inherent selectivity in the assembly of different Gβγ combinations, but in general Gβ1–4 can form dimers with most Gγ subunits (25). The physiological purpose of this large number of Gβγ combinations has intrigued researchers in the field for many years, and a large body of research indicates that GPCRs and effectors couple to a preferred subset of Gβγ combinations based somewhat on specific sequence complementarity, but even more so on cellular expression patterns, subcellular localization, and post-translational modifications (18).In contrast to Gβ1–4, Gβ5 does not interact with Gγ subunits in vivo, but it instead forms irreversible dimers with RGS proteins of the R7 family, which includes RGS proteins 6, 7, 9, and 11 (26). All R7 family proteins contain an N-terminal DEP (disheveled, Egl-10, pleckstrin) domain, a central Gγ-like (GGL) domain, and a C-terminal RGS domain (8, 26). The DEP domain interacts with the membrane anchoring/nuclear shuttling R7-binding protein, and the GGL domain binds to Gβ5 in a manner similar to other Gβγ associations (27, 28). Like Gβγs, Gβ5 and R7 RGS proteins form obligate dimers required for their mutual stability (26). Without their partner, Gβ5 and R7 RGS proteins are rapidly degraded in cells (26, 29). Gβ5-R7 RGS complexes act as important GTPase-accelerating proteins for G_i/oα and G_qα subunits in neuronal cells and some immune cells (26).It has been recently shown that all Gβ isoforms are able to interact with the CCT complex, but to varying degrees (15). Gβ4 and Gβ1 bind CCT better than Gβ2 and Gβ3, whereas Gβ5 binds CCT poorly (15). These results suggest that Gβ1 and Gβ4 might be more dependent on PhLP1 than the other Gβs, given the co-chaperone role of PhLP1 with CCT in Gβ1γ2 assembly. However, another report has indicated that Gγ2 assembly with Gβ1 and Gβ2 is more PhLP1-dependent than with Gβ3 and Gβ4 (30). Thus, it is not clear from current information whether PhLP1 and CCT participate in assembly of all Gβγ combinations or whether they contribute to the specificity of Gβγ dimer formation, nor is it clear whether they or other chaperones are involved in Gβ5-R7 RGS dimer formation. This report was designed to address these issues.     

Cleavage of Signal Regulatory Protein α (SIRPα) Enhances Inflammatory Signaling

Signal regulatory protein α (SIRPα) is a membrane glycoprotein immunoreceptor abundant in cells of monocyte lineage. SIRPα ligation by a broadly expressed transmembrane protein, CD47, results in phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs, resulting in the inhibition of NF-κB signaling in macrophages. Here we observed that proteolysis of SIRPα during inflammation is regulated by a disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 10 (ADAM10), resulting in the generation of a membrane-associated cleavage fragment in both THP-1 monocytes and human lung epithelia. We mapped a charge-dependent putative cleavage site near the membrane-proximal domain necessary for ADAM10-mediated cleavage. In addition, a secondary proteolytic cleavage within the membrane-associated SIRPα fragment by γ-secretase was identified. Ectopic expression of a SIRPα mutant plasmid encoding a proteolytically resistant form in HeLa cells inhibited activation of the NF-κB pathway and suppressed STAT1 phosphorylation in response to TNFα to a greater extent than expression of wild-type SIRPα. Conversely, overexpression of plasmids encoding the proteolytically cleaved SIRPα fragments in cells resulted in enhanced STAT-1 and NF-κB pathway activation. Thus, the data suggest that combinatorial actions of ADAM10 and γ-secretase on SIRPα cleavage promote inflammatory signaling.     

Assembly and Function of the Regulator of G protein Signaling 14 (RGS14)·H-Ras Signaling Complex in Live Cells Are Regulated by Gαi1 and Gαi-linked G Protein-coupled Receptors

Regulator of G protein signaling 14 (RGS14) is a multifunctional scaffolding protein that integrates heterotrimeric G protein and H-Ras signaling pathways. RGS14 possesses an RGS domain that binds active Gα_i/o-GTP subunits to promote GTP hydrolysis and a G protein regulatory (GPR) motif that selectively binds inactive Gα_i1/3-GDP subunits to form a stable heterodimer at cellular membranes. RGS14 also contains two tandem Ras/Rap binding domains (RBDs) that bind H-Ras. Here we show that RGS14 preferentially binds activated H-Ras-GTP in live cells to enhance H-Ras cellular actions and that this interaction is regulated by inactive Gα_i1-GDP and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) in live cells, we show that RGS14-Luciferase and active H-Ras(G/V)-Venus exhibit a robust BRET signal at the plasma membrane that is markedly enhanced in the presence of inactive Gα_i1-GDP but not active Gα_i1-GTP. Active H-Ras(G/V) interacts with a native RGS14·Gα_i1 complex in brain lysates, and co-expression of RGS14 and Gα_i1 in PC12 cells greatly enhances H-Ras(G/V) stimulatory effects on neurite outgrowth. Stimulation of the Gα_i-linked α_2A-adrenergic receptor induces a conformational change in the Gα_i1·RGS14·H-Ras(G/V) complex that may allow subsequent regulation of the complex by other binding partners. Together, these findings indicate that inactive Gα_i1-GDP enhances the affinity of RGS14 for H-Ras-GTP in live cells, resulting in a ternary signaling complex that is further regulated by GPCRs.     

Inhibition of Heterotrimeric G Protein Signaling by a Small Molecule Acting on G�� Subunit

The simultaneous activation of many distinct G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and heterotrimeric G proteins play a major role in various pathological conditions. Pan-inhibition of GPCR signaling by small molecules thus represents a novel strategy to treat various diseases. To better understand such therapeutic approach, we have characterized the biomolecular target of BIM-46187, a small molecule pan-inhibitor of GPCR signaling. Combining bioluminescence and fluorescence resonance energy transfer techniques in living cells as well as in reconstituted receptor-G protein complexes, we observed that, by direct binding to the Gα subunit, BIM-46187 prevents the conformational changes of the receptor-G protein complex associated with GPCR activation. Such a binding prevents the proper interaction of receptors with the G protein heterotrimer and inhibits the agonist-promoted GDP/GTP exchange. These observations bring further evidence that inhibiting G protein activation through direct binding to the Gα subunit is feasible and should constitute a new strategy for therapeutic intervention.G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)³ represent the largest superfamily of signaling proteins with a very high impact on drug discovery (1). Approximately 30% of the current drug targets are indeed GPCRs and these latter are involved in all major disease areas (2). The classical drug discovery process selects and optimizes compounds that interact selectively with a specific receptor (1), but recent reports show that certain critical conditions such as cancer (3) or pain (4) are driven by the concomitant activation of many different GPCRs (5). Novel therapeutic strategies could therefore emerge from the simultaneous blockade of the various GPCRs involved in such pathologies. The GPCR signaling downstream cascade triggers several protein/protein interactions that may be blocked or modulated by small molecules (6). Such protein/protein interactions involve the GPCR transmembrane domain and the heterotrimeric G protein complex, composed of an α subunit (Gα) and a βγ dimer (Gβγ), which interact sequentially with several partners (e.g. guanine nucleotides, effectors, and regulatory proteins) (7). This offers multiple possibilities to develop small molecules controlling heterotrimeric G protein signaling (6, 8, 9). For example, Higashijima et al. (10, 11) showed that Mastoparan, a peptide toxin from wasp venom, directly acts on G proteins to mimic the role played by the activated receptors. The anti-helminthic drug Suramin and some analogs represent a second class of compounds that directly interact with G proteins and interfere with nucleotide exchange (12–14). Small molecules modulating regulator of G protein signaling proteins have also been proposed for drug development (15). More recently, Bonacci et al. (16) have described fluorescein analogs that display central pain relief activity via binding to the Gβγ subunits. From our own group, we have reported in vivo inhibition of the GPCR signaling pathway by two closely related imidazopirazine containing small molecules, displaying potent antiproliferative activity (BIM-46174) (17) and potent pain relief activity (BIM-46187) (18).Here, we examined the molecular mechanisms underlying the biological activity of BIM-46187 with the various constituents of the GPCR signaling pathways. We report that this small molecule prevents GPCR-G protein signaling through a selective binding to the Gα protein subunit. Our results support the concept of targeting and inhibiting the heterotrimeric G protein complex as an approach to treat certain pathologies involving simultaneous activation of several GPCRs and/or heterotrimeric G proteins.     

Drosophila GoLoco-Protein Pins Is a Target of Gαo-mediated G Protein–coupled Receptor Signaling

G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) transduce their signals through trimeric G proteins, inducing guanine nucleotide exchange on their Gα-subunits; the resulting Gα-GTP transmits the signal further inside the cell. GoLoco domains present in many proteins play important roles in multiple trimeric G protein–dependent activities, physically binding Gα-subunits of the Gα_i/o class. In most cases GoLoco binds exclusively to the GDP-loaded form of the Gα-subunits. Here we demonstrate that the poly-GoLoco–containing protein Pins of Drosophila can bind to both GDP- and GTP-forms of Drosophila Gα_o. We identify Pins GoLoco domain 1 as necessary and sufficient for this unusual interaction with Gα_o-GTP. We further pinpoint a lysine residue located centrally in this domain as necessary for the interaction. Our studies thus identify Drosophila Pins as a target of Gα_o-mediated GPCR receptor signaling, e.g., in the context of the nervous system development, where Gα_o acts downstream from Frizzled and redundantly with Gα_i to control the asymmetry of cell divisions.     

Structural and Functional Analysis of the Regulator of G Protein Signaling 2-Gαq Complex

1. Download : Download high-res image (286KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

Highlights? Two structures of the RGS2-Gα_q complex were determined by X-ray crystallography ? RGS2 binds Gα_q in a manner distinct from how other RGS proteins bind Gα_i/o ? In its distinct pose, RGS2 forms extensive contacts with the α-helical domain of Gα_q ? Helical domain contacts contribute to binding affinity and GAP potency of RGS2     

G Protein and β-Arrestin Signaling Bias at the Ghrelin Receptor

The G protein-coupled ghrelin receptor GHSR1a is a potential pharmacological target for treating obesity and addiction because of the critical role ghrelin plays in energy homeostasis and dopamine-dependent reward. GHSR1a enhances growth hormone release, appetite, and dopamine signaling through G_q/11, G_i/o, and G_12/13 as well as β-arrestin-based scaffolds. However, the contribution of individual G protein and β-arrestin pathways to the diverse physiological responses mediated by ghrelin remains unknown. To characterize whether a signaling bias occurs for GHSR1a, we investigated ghrelin signaling in a number of cell-based assays, including Ca²⁺ mobilization, serum response factor response element, stress fiber formation, ERK1/2 phosphorylation, and β-arrestin translocation, utilizing intracellular second loop and C-tail mutants of GHSR1a. We observed that GHSR1a and β-arrestin rapidly form metastable plasma membrane complexes following exposure to an agonist, but replacement of the GHSR1a C-tail by the tail of the vasopressin 2 receptor greatly stabilizes them, producing complexes observable on the plasma membrane and also in endocytic vesicles. Mutations of the contiguous conserved amino acids Pro-148 and Leu-149 in the GHSR1a intracellular second loop generate receptors with a strong bias to G protein and β-arrestin, respectively, supporting a role for conformation-dependent signaling bias in the wild-type receptor. Our results demonstrate more balance in GHSR1a-mediated ERK signaling from G proteins and β-arrestin but uncover an important role for β-arrestin in RhoA activation and stress fiber formation. These findings suggest an avenue for modulating drug abuse-associated changes in synaptic plasticity via GHSR1a and indicate the development of GHSR1a-biased ligands as a promising strategy for selectively targeting downstream signaling events.     

Splicing Factor Transformer-2β (Tra2β) Regulates the Expression of Regulator of G Protein Signaling 4 (RGS4) Gene and Is Induced by Morphine

Regulator of G protein signaling 4 (RGS4) is a critical modulator of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated signaling and plays important roles in many neural process and diseases. Particularly, drug-induced alteration in RGS4 protein levels is associated with acute and chronic effects of drugs of abuse. However, the precise mechanism underlying the regulation of RGS4 expression is largely unknown. Here, we demonstrated that the expression of RGS4 gene was subject to regulation by alternative splicing of the exon 6. Transformer-2β (Tra2β), an important splicing factor, bound to RGS4 mRNA and increased the relative level of RGS4-1 mRNA isoform by enhancing the inclusion of exon 6. Meanwhile, Tra2β increased the expression of full-length RGS4 protein. In rat brain, Tra2β was co-localized with RGS4 in multiple opioid action-related brain regions. In addition, the acute and chronic morphine treatment induced alteration in the expression level of Tra2β in rat locus coerulus (LC) in parallel to that of RGS4 proteins. It suggests that induction of this splicing factor may contribute to the change of RGS4 level elicited by morphine. Taken together, the results provide the evidence demonstrating the function of Tra2β as a new mediator in opioid-induced signaling pathway via regulating RGS4 expression.     

Identification of G Protein α Subunit-Palmitoylating Enzyme

The heterotrimeric G protein α subunit (Gα) is targeted to the cytoplasmic face of the plasma membrane through reversible lipid palmitoylation and relays signals from G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to its effectors. By screening 23 DHHC motif (Asp-His-His-Cys) palmitoyl acyl-transferases, we identified DHHC3 and DHHC7 as Gα palmitoylating enzymes. DHHC3 and DHHC7 robustly palmitoylated Gα_q, Gα_s, and Gα_i2 in HEK293T cells. Knockdown of DHHC3 and DHHC7 decreased Gα_q/11 palmitoylation and relocalized it from the plasma membrane into the cytoplasm. Photoconversion analysis revealed that Gα_q rapidly shuttles between the plasma membrane and the Golgi apparatus, where DHHC3 specifically localizes. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching studies showed that DHHC3 and DHHC7 are necessary for this continuous Gα_q shuttling. Furthermore, DHHC3 and DHHC7 knockdown blocked the α_1A-adrenergic receptor/Gα_q/11-mediated signaling pathway. Together, our findings revealed that DHHC3 and DHHC7 regulate GPCR-mediated signal transduction by controlling Gα localization to the plasma membrane.G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) form the largest family of cell surface receptors, consisting of more than 700 members in humans. GPCRs respond to a variety of extracellular signals, including hormones and neurotransmitters, and are involved in various physiologic processes, such as smooth muscle contraction and synaptic transmission (20, 25). Heterotrimeric G proteins, composed of α, β, and γ subunits, transduce signals from GPCRs to their effectors and play a central role in the GPCR signaling pathway (13, 21, 24, 32). Although the Gα subunit seems to localize stably at the cytosolic face of the plasma membrane (PM), a recent report suggested that Gα_o, a Gα isoform, shuttles rapidly between the PM and intracellular membranes (2). The PM targeting of Gα requires both interaction with the Gβγ complex and subsequent lipid palmitoylation of Gα (22). Thus, palmitoylation of Gα is a critical determinant of membrane targeting of the heterotrimer Gαβγ.Protein palmitoylation is a common posttranslational modification with lipid palmitate and regulates protein trafficking and function (7, 18). Gα is a classic and representative palmitoyl substrate (19, 38), and recent studies revealed that protein palmitoylation modifies virtually almost all the components of G-protein signaling, including GPCRs, Gα subunits, several members of the RGS (regulators of G-protein signaling) family of GTPase-activating proteins, GPCR kinase GRK6, and some small GTPases (7, 33). This common lipid modification plays an important role in compartmentalizing G-protein signaling to the specific microdomain, such as membrane caveolae and lipid raft (26). The palmitoyl thioester bond is relatively labile, and palmitates on substrates turn over rapidly, allowing proteins to shuttle between the cytoplasm/intracellular organelles and the PM (2, 3, 27). For example, binding of isoproterenol to the β-adrenergic receptor markedly accelerates the depalmitoylation of the associated Gα_s, shifting Gα_s to the cytoplasm (37). This receptor activation-induced depalmitoylation was also observed in a major postsynaptic PSD-95 scaffold, which anchors the AMPA (alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-isoxazole-4-propionic acid)-type glutamate receptor at the excitatory postsynapse through stargazin (6). On glutamate receptor activation, accelerated depalmitoylation of PSD-95 dissociates PSD-95 from postsynaptic sites and causes AMPA receptor endocytosis (6). Thus, palmitate turnover on Gα_s and PSD-95 is accelerated by receptor activation, contributing to downregulation of the signaling pathway. However, the enzymes that add palmitate to proteins (palmitoyl-acyl transferases [PATs]) and those that cleave the thioester bond (palmitoyl-protein thioesterases) were long elusive.Recent genetic studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identified Erf2/Erf4 (1, 40) and Akr1 (29) as PATs for yeast Ras and yeast casein kinase 2, respectively. Erf2 and Akr1 have four- to six-pass transmembrane domains and share a common domain, referred to as a DHHC domain, a cysteine-rich domain with a conserved Asp-His-His-Cys signature motif. Because the DHHC domain is essential for the PAT activity, we isolated 23 mammalian DHHC domain-containing proteins (DHHC proteins) and developed a systematic screening method to identify the specific enzyme-substrate pairs (11, 12): DHHC2, -3, -7, and -15 for PSD-95 (11); DHHC21 for endothelial NO synthase (10); and DHHC3 and -7 for GABA_A receptor γ2 subunit (9). Several other groups also reported that DHHC9 with GCP16 mediates palmitoylation toward H- and N-Ras (36) and that DHHC17, also known as HIP14, palmitoylates several neuronal proteins: huntingtin (14), SNAP-25, and CSP (14, 23, 35). However, the existence of PATs for Gα has been controversial because spontaneous palmitoylation of Gα could occur in vitro (4).In this study, we screened the 23 DHHC clones to examine which DHHC proteins can palmitoylate Gα. We found that DHHC3 and -7 specifically and robustly palmitoylate Gα at the Golgi apparatus. Inhibition of DHHC3 and -7 reduces Gα_q/11 palmitoylation levels and delocalizes it from the PM to the cytoplasm in HeLa cells and primary hippocampal neurons. Also, DHHC3 and -7 are necessary for the continuous Gα_q shuttling between the Golgi apparatus and the PM. Finally, blocking DHHC3 and -7 inhibits the α_1A-adrenergic receptor [α_1A-AR]/Gα_q-mediated signaling pathway, indicating that DHHC3 and -7 play an essential role in GPCR signaling by regulating Gα localization.     

Caerulomycin A Enhances Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β)-Smad3 Protein Signaling by Suppressing Interferon-γ (IFN-γ)-Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 1 (STAT1) Protein Signaling to Expand Regulatory T Cells (Tregs)

Cytokines play a very important role in the regulation of immune homeostasis. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) responsible for the generation of peripheral tolerance are under the tight regulation of the cytokine milieu. In this study, we report a novel role of a bipyridyl compound, Caerulomycin A (CaeA), in inducing the generation of Tregs. It was observed that CaeA substantially up-regulated the pool of Tregs, as evidenced by an increased frequency of CD4⁺ Foxp3⁺ cells. In addition, CaeA significantly suppressed the number of Th1 and Th17 cells, as supported by a decreased percentage of CD4⁺/IFN-γ⁺ and CD4⁺/IL-17⁺ cells, respectively. Furthermore, we established the mechanism and observed that CaeA interfered with IFN-γ-induced STAT1 signaling by augmenting SOCS1 expression. An increase in the TGF-β-mediated Smad3 activity was also noted. Furthermore, CaeA rescued Tregs from IFN-γ-induced inhibition. These results were corroborated by blocking Smad3 activity, which abolished the CaeA-facilitated generation of Tregs. In essence, our results indicate a novel role of CaeA in inducing the generation of Tregs. This finding suggests that CaeA has enough potential to be considered as a potent future drug for the treatment of autoimmunity.     

Regulator of G-Protein Signaling – 5 (RGS5) Is a Novel Repressor of Hedgehog Signaling

Hedgehog (Hh) signaling plays fundamental roles in morphogenesis, tissue repair, and human disease. Initiation of Hh signaling is controlled by the interaction of two multipass membrane proteins, patched (Ptc) and smoothened (Smo). Recent studies identify Smo as a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR)-like protein that signals through large G-protein complexes which contain the Gα_i subunit. We hypothesize Regulator of G-Protein Signaling (RGS) proteins, and specifically RGS5, are endogenous repressors of Hh signaling via their ability to act as GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) for GTP-bound Gα_i, downstream of Smo. In support of this hypothesis, we demonstrate that RGS5 over-expression inhibits sonic hedgehog (Shh)-mediated signaling and osteogenesis in C3H10T1/2 cells. Conversely, signaling is potentiated by siRNA-mediated knock-down of RGS5 expression, but not RGS4 expression. Furthermore, using immuohistochemical analysis and co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP), we demonstrate that RGS5 is present with Smo in primary cilia. This organelle is required for canonical Hh signaling in mammalian cells, and RGS5 is found in a physical complex with Smo in these cells. We therefore conclude that RGS5 is an endogenous regulator of Hh-mediated signaling and that RGS proteins are potential targets for novel therapeutics in Hh-mediated diseases.     

Tomato 14-3-3 Protein 7 Positively Regulates Immunity-Associated Programmed Cell Death by Enhancing Protein Abundance and Signaling Ability of MAPKKK α

Programmed cell death (PCD) is triggered when Pto, a Ser-Thr protein kinase, recognizes either the AvrPto or AvrPtoB effector from Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato. This PCD requires mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase (MAPKKK α ) as a positive regulator in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and Nicotiana benthamiana. To examine how PCD-eliciting activity of the tomato MAPKKK α protein is regulated, we screened for MAPKKK α -interacting proteins in tomato and identified a 14-3-3 protein, TFT7. Virus-induced gene silencing using the TFT7 gene in N. benthamiana compromised both Pto- and MAPKKK α -mediated PCD, and coexpression of TFT7 with tomato MAPKKK α enhanced MAPKKK α -mediated PCD. TFT7 was also required for PCD associated with several other disease resistance proteins and contributed to resistance against P. syringae pv tomato. Coexpression of TFT7 with MAPKKK α in vivo caused increased accumulation of the kinase and enhanced phosphorylation of two MAP kinases. TFT7 protein contains a phosphopeptide binding motif that is present in human 14-3-3 ϵ, and substitutions in this motif abolished interaction with MAPKKK α in vivo and also the PCD-enhancing activity of TFT7. A 14-3-3 binding motif, including a putative phosphorylated Ser-535, is present in the C-terminal region of MAPKKK α. An S535A substitution in MAPKKK α reduced interaction with TFT7 and both PCD-eliciting ability and stability of MAPKKK α. Our results provide new insights into a role for 14-3-3 proteins in regulating immunity-associated PCD pathways in plants.     

NLRP3 Protein Deficiency Exacerbates Hyperoxia-induced Lethality through Stat3 Protein Signaling Independent of Interleukin-1β

Supplemental oxygen inhalation is frequently used to treat severe respiratory failure; however, prolonged exposure to hyperoxia causes hyperoxic acute lung injury (HALI), which induces acute respiratory distress syndrome and leads to high mortality rates. Recent investigations suggest the possible role of NLRP3 inflammasomes, which regulate IL-1β production and lead to inflammatory responses, in the pathophysiology of HALI; however, their role is not fully understood. In this study, we investigated the role of NLRP3 inflammasomes in mice with HALI. Under hyperoxic conditions, NLRP3^−/− mice died at a higher rate compared with wild-type and IL-1β^−/− mice, and there was no difference in IL-1β production in their lungs. Under hyperoxic conditions, the lungs of NLRP3^−/− mice exhibited reduced inflammatory responses, such as inflammatory cell infiltration and cytokine expression, as well as increased and decreased expression of MMP-9 and Bcl-2, respectively. NLRP3^−/− mice exhibited diminished expression and activation of Stat3, which regulates MMP-9 and Bcl-2, in addition to increased numbers of apoptotic alveolar epithelial cells. In vitro experiments revealed that alveolar macrophages and neutrophils promoted Stat3 activation in alveolar epithelial cells. Furthermore, NLRP3 deficiency impaired the migration of neutrophils and chemokine expression by macrophages. These findings demonstrate that NLRP3 regulates Stat3 signaling in alveolar epithelial cells by affecting macrophage and neutrophil function independent of IL-1β production and contributes to the pathophysiology of HALI.     

IQGAP1 Protein Regulates Nuclear Localization of β-Catenin via Importin-β5 Protein in Wnt Signaling

In the canonical Wnt signaling pathway, the translocation of β-catenin is important for the activation of target genes in the nucleus. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying its nuclear localization remain unclear. In the present study, we found IQGAP1 to be a regulator of β-catenin function via importin-β5. In Xenopus embryos, depletion of IQGAP1 reduced Wnt-induced nuclear accumulation of β-catenin and expression of Wnt target genes during early embryogenesis. Depletion of endogenous importin-β5 associated with IQGAP1 also reduced expression of Wnt target genes and the nuclear localization of IQGAP1 and β-catenin. Moreover, a small GTPase, Ran1, contributes to the nuclear translocation of β-catenin and the activation of Wnt target genes. These results suggest that IQGAP1 functions as a regulator of translocation of β-catenin in the canonical Wnt signaling pathway.     

β-Arrestin Recruitment and G Protein Signaling by the Atypical Human Chemokine Decoy Receptor CCX-CKR

Chemokine receptors form a large subfamily of G protein-coupled receptors that predominantly activate heterotrimeric G_i proteins and are involved in immune cell migration. CCX-CKR is an atypical chemokine receptor with high affinity for CCL19, CCL21, and CCL25 chemokines, but is not known to activate intracellular signaling pathways. However, CCX-CKR acts as decoy receptor and efficiently internalizes these chemokines, thereby preventing their interaction with other chemokine receptors, like CCR7 and CCR9. Internalization of fluorescently labeled CCL19 correlated with β-arrestin2-GFP translocation. Moreover, recruitment of β-arrestins to CCX-CKR in response to CCL19, CCL21, and CCL25 was demonstrated using enzyme-fragment complementation and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer methods. To unravel why CCX-CKR is unable to activate G_i signaling, CCX-CKR chimeras were constructed by substituting its intracellular loops with the corresponding CCR7 or CCR9 domains. The signaling properties of chimeric CCX-CKR receptors were characterized using a cAMP-responsive element (CRE)-driven reporter gene assay. Unexpectedly, wild type CCX-CKR and a subset of the chimeras induced an increase in CRE activity in response to CCL19, CCL21, and CCL25 in the presence of the G_i inhibitor pertussis toxin. CCX-CKR signaling to CRE required an intact DRY motif. These data suggest that inactive G_i proteins impair CCX-CKR signaling most likely by hindering the interaction of this receptor with pertussis toxin-insensitive G proteins that transduce signaling to CRE. On the other hand, recruitment of the putative signaling scaffold β-arrestin to CCX-CKR in response to chemokines might allow activation of yet to be identified signal transduction pathways.