COX-2: Where are we in 2003? - Be strong and resolute: continue to use COX-2 selective inhibitors at recommended dosages in appropriate patients

Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 selective inhibitors have been shown to have comparable efficacy to nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Large outcome studies have shown that patients with OA and RA not taking low-dose aspirin have fewer symptomatic and complicated upper GI events when treated with COX-2 selective inhibitors than with nonselective NSAIDs. When used in recommended dosages, there is no convincing evidence that patients treated with COX-2 selective inhibitors have an increased incidence of cardiovascular thrombotic events, including non-fatal myocardial infarction, than patients treated with either placebo or nonselective NSAIDs other than naproxen. Co-therapy with low-dose aspirin is recommended in patients with OA and RA at increased risk for cardiovascular events; the need for gastroprotective therapy in such patients is controversial.     

COX-2: Where are we in 2003? - Be strong and resolute: continue to use COX-2 selective inhibitors at recommended dosages in appropriate patients

Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 selective inhibitors have been shown to have comparable efficacy to nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Large outcome studies have shown that patients with OA and RA not taking low-dose aspirin have fewer symptomatic and complicated upper GI events when treated with COX-2 selective inhibitors than with nonselective NSAIDs. When used in recommended dosages, there is no convincing evidence that patients treated with COX-2 selective inhibitors have an increased incidence of cardiovascular thrombotic events, including non-fatal myocardial infarction, than patients treated with either placebo or nonselective NSAIDs other than naproxen. Co-therapy with low-dose aspirin is recommended in patients with OA and RA at increased risk for cardiovascular events; the need for gastroprotective therapy in such patients is controversial.     

Cardiovascular and gastrointestinal effects of COX-2 inhibitors and NSAIDs: achieving a balance

Conventional 'nonselective' nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used for the treatment of pain and inflammation; however, the potential gastrointestinal risks associated with their use can be a cause for concern. In response to the adverse effects that can accompany nonselective NSAID use, selective cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors were developed to target the COX-2 isoenzyme, thus providing anti-inflammatory and analgesic benefits while theoretically sparing the gastroprotective activity of the COX-1 isoenzyme. Data from large-scale clinical trials have confirmed that the COX-2 inhibitors are associated with substantial reductions in gastrointestinal risk in the majority of patients who do not receive aspirin. However, some or all of the gastrointestinal benefit of COX-2 inhibitors may be lost in patients who receive low, cardioprotective doses of aspirin, and recent evidence suggests that some of these agents, at some doses, may be associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular adverse events compared with no therapy. The risks and benefits of conventional NSAIDs and of COX-2 inhibitors must be weighed carefully; in clinical practice many patients who might benefit from NSAID or COX-2 therapy are likely to be elderly and at relatively high risk for gastrointestinal and cardiovascular adverse events. These patients are also more likely to be taking low-dose aspirin for cardiovascular prophylaxis and over-the-counter NSAIDs for pain. Identifying therapies that provide relief from arthritis related symptoms, confer optimum cardioprotection, and preserve the gastrointestinal mucosa is complex. Factors to consider include the interference of certain NSAIDs with the antiplatelet effects of aspirin, differences in the adverse gastrointestinal event rates among nonselective NSAIDs and selective COX-2 inhibitors, emerging data regarding the relative risks for cardiovascular events associated with these drugs, and the feasibility and cost of co-therapy with proton pump inhibitors.     

Esomeprazole versus pantoprazole for healing erosive oesophagitis

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of esomeprazole and pantoprazole with regard to healing and relief from gastroesophageal reflux disease-related symptoms. I this multicentre, randomized, single-blind study 180 patients (ITT population) diagnosed with endoscopically proven GERD grade A,B,C received esomeprazole (40 mg once daily (o.d.), n = 90) orpantoprazole (40 mg o.d., n = 90). Healing and relief from GERD-related symptoms were assessed at first and final visit (after 4 or 8 weeks of treatment). Esomeprazole 40 mg provided significantly greater healing than pantoprazole 40 mg after 4 weeks of treatment in patients with EE (77.8% vs. 72.2%). Esomeprazole-treated patients were healed after up to 8 weeks of treatment similar those treated with pantoprazole (92.2% vs. 91.1%). The proportion of heartburn-free days was similar in patients treated with esomeprazole and to those treated with pantoprazole.     

Cyclooxygenase isoforms and atherosclerosis

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used in the treatment of arthritis and pain. However, their long-term use is limited by gastrointestinal (GI) side effects such as gastric ulcers. NSAIDs act by inhibiting an enzyme called cyclooxygenase. Cyclooxygenase (COX) catalyses the generation of prostaglandins from arachidonic acid. Two isoforms of the enzyme exist--COX-1 and COX-2--both of which are targets for NSAIDs. Although they are associated with GI toxicity, NSAIDs have important antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory effects. The GI injury has been attributed to COX-1 inhibition and the anti-inflammatory effects to COX-2 inhibition. As COX-2 is traditionally viewed as an inducible enzyme, selective inhibition of COX-2 by 'coxibs' (selective COX-2 inhibitors) has been employed to achieve anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects without GI side effects. However, recently there have been suggestions that chronic administration of coxibs might increase the risk of cardiovascular events, such as atherosclerosis, compared with traditional NSAIDs. In vascular disease, there is increased expression of both COX-1 and COX-2, resulting in enhanced prostaglandin generation. The specific role of COX-1 and COX-2 in vascular regulation is still unknown but such knowledge is essential for the effective use of coxibs. Although more evidence is pointing to selective COX-1 inhibition as a therapeutic measure in inflammatory atherosclerosis, there are some studies that suggest that inhibition of COX-2 might have a potential benefit on atherosclerosis.     

Design,Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of New N-Acyl Hydrazones with a Methyl Sulfonyl Moiety as Selective COX-2 Inhibitors

The mechanism of action of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is inhibition of specific prostaglandin (PG) synthesis by inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes. The two COX isoenzymes show 60 % similarity. It is known that the nonspecific side effects of conventional NSAIDs are physiologically caused by inhibition of the COX-1 enzyme. Therefore, the use of COX-2 selective inhibitors is seen to be a more beneficial approach in reducing these negative effects. However, some of the existing COX-2 selective inhibitors show cardiovascular side effects. Therefore, studies on the development of new selective COX-2 inhibitors remain necessary. It is important to develop new COX-2 inhibitors in the field of medicinal chemistry. Accordingly, novel N-acyl hydrazone derivatives were synthesized as new COX-2 inhibitors in this study. The hydrazone structure, also known for its COX activity, is important in terms of many biological activities and was preferred as the main structure in the design of these compounds. A methyl sulfonyl pharmacophore was added to the structure in order to increase the affinity for the polar side pocket present in the COX-2 enzyme. It is known that methyl sulfonyl groups are suitable for polar side pockets. The synthesis of the compounds ( 3a – 3j ) was characterized by spectroscopic methods. Evaluation of in vitro COX-1/COX-2 enzyme inhibition was performed by fluorometric method. According to the enzyme inhibition results, the obtained compounds displayed the predicted selectivity for COX-2 enzyme inhibition. Compound 3j showed important COX-2 inhibition with a value of IC₅₀=0.143 uM. Interaction modes between the COX-2 enzyme and compound 3j were investigated by docking studies.     

The use of H2 antagonists in treating and preventing NSAID-induced mucosal damage

Pain affects the quality of life for millions of individuals and is a major reason for healthcare utilization. As populations age, medical personnel will need to manage more and more patients suffering from pain associated with degenerative and inflammatory musculoskeletal disorders. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are an effective treatment for both acute and chronic musculoskeletal pain; however, their use is associated with potentially significant gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. Guidelines suggest various strategies to prevent problems in those at risk for NSAID-associated GI complications. In this article, we review the data supporting one such strategy - the use of histamine type-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) - for the prevention of GI adverse events in NSAID users. Older studies suggest that high-dose H2RAs are effective in preventing upper GI ulcers and dyspepsia. This suggestion was recently confirmed during clinical trials with a new ibuprofen/famotidine combination that reduced the risk of ulcers by 50% compared with ibuprofen alone.     

Current state of therapy for pain and inflammation

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including both traditional nonselective NSAIDs and the selective cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors, are among the most widely used medications in the USA. Traditional NSAIDs, although effective at relieving pain and inflammation, are associated with a significant increase in the risk for gastrointestinal adverse events. Throughout the 1990s these events were estimated to result in approximately 100,000 hospitalizations and 16,500 deaths each year nationally. Recent studies have indicated that the risk for serious NSAID gastropathy has declined substantially during the past decade as a result of a number of factors, including lower doses of NSAIDs, the use of gastroprotective agents such as proton pump inhibitors and misoprostol, and the introduction of the selective COX-2 inhibitors. One therapeutic approach that may reduce the risk for gastrointestinal side effects associated with traditional NSAIDs while retaining their efficacy is the inclusion of co-therapy with a proton pump inhibitor; these agents inhibit acid secretion and have been demonstrated to promote ulcer healing in patients with NSAID-related gastric ulcers. Alternatively, COX-2 selective agents have been used to treat patients at high risk for such events. Both nonselective and selective COX-2 inhibitors have now been shown to be associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular events. These studies, together with the outcomes of the recent US Food and Drug Administration decision to require 'black box' warnings regarding potential cardiovascular risks associated with NSAIDs, suggest that the use of COX-2 inhibitors as the sole strategy for gastroprotection in patients with arthritis and other pain syndromes must be reconsidered, particularly among those at risk for cardiovascular events.     

The use of proton pump inhibitors in treating and preventing NSAID-induced mucosal damage

NSAIDs are prescribed widely but have rare serious gastrointestinal side effects. More recently, adverse cardiovascular effects of these drugs have also been recognized, leading to the withdrawal of some agents and continuing uncertainty about the best approach for patients requiring NSAID therapy. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) provide potent and long-lasting inhibition of gastric acid secretion and have proven efficacy in healing NSAID-associated ulcers, including those with continued exposure to NSAIDs. PPIs have also shown efficacy in reducing the risk of ulcerations due to NSAID use compared with NSAIDs alone in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) where endoscopic ulcers are used as the primary endpoint, albeit a surrogate marker for clinical ulcers and complications. Large RCT outcome trials comparing patients exposed to NSAIDs with and without PPI co-therapy have not been performed, but adequately powered RCTs in high-risk patients demonstrate that PPI + nonselective NSAID provides similar rates of symptomatic ulcer recurrence rates as the use of a cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 selective inhibitor. A RCT in high-risk patients with previous ulcer complications supports the additive bene3 t of two risk-reducing strategies, as ulcer complication recurrence was eliminated in high-risk patients who were given a COX-2 selective agent with a PPI. Helicobacter pylori, an independent risk factor for ulcers, should be sought out and eradicated in patients at increased gastrointestinal risk, typically those with an ulcer history. Following H. pylori eradication, however, patients remain at risk and co-therapy with a PPI is recommended. NSAID medication selection should consider both the individual patients' gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risks.     

Evaluation of classical NSAIDs and COX-2 selective inhibitors on purified ovine enzymes and human whole blood.

Cyclooxygenase is the key enzyme in the biosynthesis of prostanoids, biologically active substances involved in several physiological processes and also in pathological conditions such as inflammation. It has been well known for 10 years that this enzyme exists under two forms: a constitutive (COX-1) and an inducible form (COX-2). Both enzymes are sensitive to inhibition by conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Observations were made that COX-1 was mainly involved in homeostatic processes, while the COX-2 expression was associated with pathological conditions leading to the development of COX-2 selective inhibitors. Several methods have been reported for the evaluation of the COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitory potency and selectivity of conventional or COX-2 selective NSAIDs. In this study, we evaluated the COXs inhibitory profile of both conventional NSAIDs and COX-2 selective inhibitors using two different in vitro methods: the first test was performed using purified enzymes while the second method consisted of a whole blood assay. The results obtained with reference drugs in these two assays will be discussed and compared in this article.     

The effectiveness of five strategies for the prevention of gastrointestinal toxicity induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: systematic review

Objectives To assess the effectiveness of five gastroprotective strategies for people taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)—H₂ receptor antagonists plus non-selective (or cyclo-oxygenase-1) NSAIDs; proton pump inhibitors plus non-selective NSAIDs; misoprostol plus non-selective NSAIDs; COX-2 selective NSAIDs; or COX-2 specific NSAIDs—in reducing serious gastrointestinal complications, symptomatic ulcers, serious cardiovascular or renal disease, and deaths, and improving quality of life.Data sources The Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, Current Controlled Trials, and System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe (SIGLE) were searched to May 2002. Bibliographies and author contacts were used to identify further studies; non-English articles were included.Review methods Trial selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed independently, in duplicate. Articles were rejected only if the study was not a randomised controlled trial; did not assess a gastroprotective strategy versus placebo; included exclusively children or healthy volunteers; lasted less than 21 days; or no review outcomes were measured. Quality assessment included allocation concealment and baseline similarity.Random effects meta-analysis, meta-regression and subgrouping were used to pool effects and analyse associations with length of follow up, mean age, and baseline gastrointestinal status. Heterogeneity was examined and sensitivity analyses performed.Results Of 112 included randomised controlled trials (74 666 participants), five were judged to be at low risk of bias, and 138 deaths and 248 serious gastrointestinal events were reported overall. On comparing gastroprotective strategies versus placebo we found no evidence of effectiveness of H₂ receptor antagonists for any primary outcomes (few events reported); proton pump inhibitors may reduce the risk of symptomatic ulcers (relative risk 0.09, 95% confidence interval 0.02 to 0.47); misoprostol reduces the risk of serious gastrointestinal complications (0.57, 0.36 to 0.91) and symptomatic ulcers (0.36, 0.20 to 0.67); COX-2 selectives reduce the risk of symptomatic ulcers (0.41, 0.26 to 0.65) and COX-2 specifics reduce the risk of symptomatic ulcers (0.49, 0.38 to 0.62) and possibly serious gastrointestinal complications (0.55, 0.38 to 0.80). All strategies except COX-2 selectives reduce the risk of endoscopic ulcers (at least 3 mm in diameter).Conclusions Misoprostol, COX-2 specific and selective NSAIDs, and probably proton pump inhibitors significantly reduce the risk of symptomatic ulcers, and misoprostol and probably COX-2 specifics significantly reduce the risk of serious gastrointestinal complications, but data quality is low. More data on H₂ receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors are needed, as is better reporting of rare but important outcomes.     

Synthesis and biological evaluation of 2,5-disubstituted 1,3,4-oxadiazole derivatives with both COX and LOX inhibitory activity

Dual cyclooxygenase/lipoxygenase (COX/LOX) inhibitors constitute a valuable alternative to classical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and selective COX-2 inhibitors for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. A series of 3-(5-phenyl/phenylamino-[1,3,4]oxadiazol-2-yl)-chromen-2-one and N-[5-(2-oxo-2H-chromen-3-yl)-[1,3,4]oxadiazol-2-yl]-benzamide derivatives were synthesized and screened for anti-inflammatory, analgesic activity. All the derivatives prepared are active in inhibiting oedema induced by carrageenan. Compound 4e was found more potent with 89% of inhibition followed by compound 4b (86%). Compounds with >70% of anti-inflammatory activity were tested for analgesic, ulcerogenic, and lipid peroxidation profile. Selected compounds were also evaluated for inhibition of COXs (COX-1 and COX-2) and LOXs (LOX-5, LOX-12, and LOX-15). Compound 4e was comparatively selective for COX-2, LOX-5, and LOX-15. Study revealed that these derivatives were more effective than ibuprofen with reduced side effects. It can be suggested that these derivatives could be used to develop more potent and safer NSAIDs.     

埃索美拉唑治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性十二指肠球部溃疡疗效观察

目的：比较埃索关拉唑与兰索拉唑、奥美拉唑三联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌（Hp）阳性十二指肠球部渍疡疗效观察。方法：将84例Hp阳性的十二指肠球部溃疡随机分为三组。埃索美拉唑组（28例）：埃索美拉唑20mg＋阿莫西林1g＋呋喃唑酮100mg,每日2次,共7日,后服用埃索美拉唑20mg,每日一次,共21天;兰索拉唑组（28例）：兰索拉唑15mg＋阿莫西林1g＋呋喃唑酮100mg,每日2次,共7日,后服用兰索拉唑15mg,每日一次,共21天;奥美拉唑组（28例）：奥美拉唑20mg＋阿莫西林1g＋呋喃唑酮100mg,每日2次,共7日,后服用奥美拉唑20mg,每日一次,共21天。疗效结束4周后复查胃镜并检测Hp,观察腹痛缓解率、溃疡愈合率,Hp根治率及药物不良反应。结果：埃索美拉唑组、兰索拉唑组和奥关拉唑组溃疡愈合率分别为100％,85．7％,82．1％,HP根治率为85．7％,60．7％,64.3％,埃索美拉唑组溃疡愈合率及Hp根除率高于兰索拉唑组及奥美拉唑组,差异具有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。兰索拉唑组及奥美拉唑组溃疡愈合率及Hp根除率无明显差异（P〉0．05）。三组用药后不良反应少,具较好的安全性。结论：埃索关拉唑三联疗法治疗Hp阳性的消化性溃疡疗效优于兰索拉唑及奥美拉唑三联疗法,值得临床广泛应用。     

A novel genetic model of selective COX-2 inhibition: comparison with COX-2 null mice

Prostaglandin H Synthase (PGHS) is a bi-functional enzyme with a cyclooxygenase (COX) activity and a functionally linked peroxidase (POX) activity that exists in two isoforms (COX-1, COX-2). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including the selective COX-2 inhibitors, block COX activity while leaving POX activity unscathed. Recently, some selective COX-2 inhibitors were withdrawn from the market due to elevated cardiovascular risk in placebo-controlled trials. Mice deficient for PGHS2 were developed in 1995 and through numerous subsequent studies have revealed significant roles in renal development, ductus arteriosus patency/closure, skin carcinogenesis and cardiovascular function. In this short review, we compare a novel genetic COX-2 selective inhibition mouse model with the originally described COX-2 null mice in these different physiological functions.     

Reduced risk of human lung cancer by selective cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) blockade: results of a case control study

We conducted a case control study of selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) blocking agents and lung cancer. A total of 492 newly diagnosed lung cancer cases were ascertained during January 1, 2002 to September 30, 2004, at The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio. All cases were confirmed by examination of the pathology report. Healthy population controls without cancer were ascertained during the same time period. Controls were frequency matched at a rate of 2:1 to the cases by age, gender, and county of residence. We collected information on type, frequency, and duration of use of selective COX-2 inhibitors (primarily celecoxib or rofecoxib) and nonselective NSAIDs such as ibuprofen and aspirin. Estimates of odds ratios (OR) were obtained with adjustment for cigarette smoking, age and other potential confounders using logistic regression analysis. Odds Ratios for selective COX-2 inhibitors were adjusted for past use of other NSAIDs. Use of any selective COX-2 inhibitor for more than one year produced a significant (60%) reduction in the risk of lung cancer (OR=0.40, 95% CI=0.19-0.81). Observed risk reductions were consistent for men (OR=0.26, 95% CI=0.10-0.62) and women (OR=0.52, 95% CI=0.24-1.13) and for individual COX-2 inhibitors (OR=0.28, 95% CI=-0.12-0.67, for celecoxib and OR=0.55, 95% CI=0.19-1.56, for rofecoxib). Intake of ibuprofen or aspirin also produced significant risk reductions (OR=0.40, 95% CI=0.23-0.73 and OR=0.53, 95% CI=0.34-0.82, respectively), whereas acetaminophen, an analgesic with negligible COX-2 activity, had no effect on the risk (OR=1.36, 95% CI=0.53-3.37). This investigation demonstrates for the first time that selective COX-2 blocking agents have strong potential for the chemoprevention of human lung cancer.     

Mediators of PGE2 synthesis and signalling downstream of COX-2 represent potential targets for the prevention/treatment of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is a major cause of mortality and whilst up to 80% of sporadic colorectal tumours are considered preventable, trends toward increasing obesity suggest the potential for a further increase in its worldwide incidence. Novel methods of colorectal cancer prevention and therapy are therefore of considerable importance. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are chemopreventive against colorectal cancer, mainly through their inhibitory effects on the cyclooxygenase isoform COX-2. COX enzymes represent the committed step in prostaglandin biosynthesis and it is predominantly increased COX-2-mediated prostaglandin-E₂ (PGE₂) production that has a strong association with colorectal neoplasia, by promoting cell survival, cell growth, migration, invasion and angiogenesis. COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition by traditional NSAIDs (for example, aspirin) although chemopreventive have some side effects due to the role of COX-1 in maintaining the integrity of the gastric mucosa. Interestingly, the use of COX-2 selective NSAIDs has also shown promise in the prevention/treatment of colorectal cancer while having a reduced impact on the gastric mucosa. However, the prolonged use of high dose COX-2 selective inhibitors is associated with a risk of cardiovascular side effects. Whilst COX-2 inhibitors may still represent viable adjuvants to current colorectal cancer therapy, there is an urgent need to further our understanding of the downstream mechanisms by which PGE₂ promotes tumorigenesis and hence identify safer, more effective strategies for the prevention of colorectal cancer. In particular, PGE₂ synthases and E-prostanoid receptors (EP1–4) have recently attracted considerable interest in this area. It is hoped that at the appropriate stage, selective (and possibly combinatorial) inhibition of the synthesis and signalling of those prostaglandins most highly associated with colorectal tumorigenesis, such as PGE₂, may have advantages over COX-2 selective inhibition and therefore represent more suitable targets for long-term chemoprevention. Furthermore, as COX-2 is found to be overexpressed in cancers such as breast, gastric, lung and pancreatic, these investigations may also have broad implications for the prevention/treatment of a number of other malignancies.     

Indolyl esters and amides related to indomethacin are selective COX-2 inhibitors

Previous studies from our laboratory have revealed that esterification/amidation of the carboxylic acid moiety in the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, indomethacin, generates potent and selective COX-2 inhibitors. In the present study, a series of reverse ester/amide derivatives were synthesized and evaluated as selective COX-2 inhibitors. Most of the reverse esters/amides displayed time-dependent COX-2 inhibition with IC₅₀ values in the low nanomolar range. Replacement of the 4-chlorobenzoyl group on the indole nitrogen with a 4-bromobenzyl moiety resulted in compounds that retained selective COX-2 inhibitory potency. In addition to inhibiting COX-2 activity in vitro, the reverse esters/amides also inhibited COX-2 activity in the mouse macrophage-like cell line, RAW264.7. Overall, this strategy broadens the scope of our previous methodology of neutralizing the carboxylic acid group in NSAIDs as a means of generating COX-2-selective inhibitors and is potentially applicable to other NSAIDs.