Multiconnection of identical zinc finger: implication for DNA binding affinity and unit modulation of the three zinc finger domain

Cys(2)-His(2)-type zinc finger proteins have a tandemly repeated array structure consisting of independent finger modules. They are expected to elevate the DNA binding affinity and specificity by increasing the number of finger modules. To investigate the relation between the number and the DNA binding affinity of the zinc finger, we have designed the two- to four-finger peptides by connecting the central zinc finger (finger 2) of Sp1 with the canonical linker sequence, Thr-Gly-Glu-Lys-Pro. Gel mobility shift assays reveal that the cognate three- and four-finger peptides, Sp1(zf222) and Sp1(zf2222), strongly bind to the predicted target sequences, but the two-finger peptide, Sp1(zf22), does not. Of special interest is the fact that the dissociation constant for Sp1(zf2222) binding to the target DNA is comparable to that for Sp1(zf222). The methylation interference, DNase I and hydroxyl radical footprintings, and circular permutation analyses demonstrate that Sp1(zf2222) binds to its target site with three successive zinc fingers and the binding of the fourth zinc finger is inhibited by DNA bending induced by the binding of the three-finger domain. The present results strongly indicate that the zinc finger protein binds to DNA by the three-finger domain as one binding unit. In addition, this information provides the basis for the design of a novel multifinger protein with high affinity and specificity for long DNA sequences, such as chromosomal DNAs.     

Finger-positional change in three zinc finger protein Sp1: influence of terminal finger in DNA recognition

The connection of functional modules is effective for the design of DNA binding molecules with the desired sequence specificity. C(2)H(2)-type zinc finger proteins have a tandemly repeated array structure consisting of independent finger modules and are expected to recognize any DNA sequences by permutation, multi-connection, and the substitution of various sets of zinc fingers. To investigate the effects of the replacement of the terminal finger on the DNA recognition by other fingers, we have constructed the three zinc finger peptides with finger substitution at the N- or C-terminus, Sp1(zf223), Sp1(zf323), and Sp1(zf321). From the results of gel mobility shift assays, each mutant peptide binds preferentially to the target sequence that is predicted if the fingers act in a modular fashion. The methylation interference analyses demonstrate that in the cases of the N-terminal finger substitution mutants, Sp1(zf223) and Sp1(zf323), the N-terminal finger recognizes bases to different extents from that of the wild-type peptide, Sp1(zf123). Of special interest is the fact that the N-terminal finger of the C-terminal finger substitution mutant, Sp1(zf321), shows a distinct base recognition from those of Sp1(zf123) and Sp1(zf323). DNase I footprinting analyses indicate that the C-terminal finger (active finger) induces a conformational change in the DNA in the region for the binding of the N-terminal finger (passive finger). The present results strongly suggest that the extent of base recognition of the N-terminal finger is dominated by the binding of the C-terminal finger. This information provides an important clue for the creation of a zinc finger peptide with the desired specificity, which is applicable to the design of novel drugs and biological tools.     

Structure and DNA binding characteristics of the three‐Cys2His2 domain of mouse testis zinc finger protein

The C‐terminal three‐Cys₂His₂ zinc‐finger domain (TZD) of mouse testis zinc‐finger protein binds to the 5′‐TGTACAGTGT‐3′ at the Aie1 (aurora‐C) promoter with high specificity. Interestingly, the primary sequence of TZD is unique, possessing two distinct linkers, TGEKP and GAAP, and distinct residues at presumed DNA binding sites at each finger, especially finger 3. A K_d value of ～10^?8 M was obtained from surface plasmon resonance analysis for the TZD‐DNA complex. NMR structure of the free TZD showed that each zinc finger forms a typical ββα fold. On binding to DNA, chemical shift perturbations and the R₂ transverse relaxation rate in finger 3 are significantly smaller than those in fingers 1 and 2, which indicates that the DNA binding affinity in finger 3 is weaker. Furthermore, the shift perturbations between TZD in complex with the cognate DNA and its serial mutants revealed that both ADE7 and CYT8, underlined in 5′‐ATATGTACAGTGTTAT‐3′, are critical in specific binding, and the DNA binding in finger 3 is sequence independent. Remarkably, the shift perturbations in finger 3 on the linker mutation of TZD (GAAP mutated to TGEKP) were barely detected, which further indicates that finger 3 does not play a critical role in DNA sequence‐specific recognition. The complex model showed that residues important for DNA binding are mainly located on positions ?1, 2, 3, and 6 of α‐helices in fingers 1 and 2. The DNA sequence and nonsequence‐specific bindings occurring simultaneously in TZD provide valuable information for better understanding of protein–DNA recognition. Proteins 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Combining structure-based design with phage display to create new Cys(2)His(2) zinc finger dimers

BACKGROUND: Several strategies have been reported for the design and selection of novel DNA-binding proteins. Most of these studies have used Cys(2)His(2) zinc finger proteins as a framework, and have focused on constructs that bind DNA in a manner similar to Zif268, with neighboring fingers connected by a canonical (Krüppel-type) linker. This linker does not seem ideal for larger constructs because only modest improvements in affinity are observed when more than three fingers are connected in this manner. Two strategies have been described that allow the productive assembly of more than three canonically linked fingers on a DNA site: connecting sets of fingers using linkers (covalent), or assembling sets of fingers using dimerization domains (non-covalent). RESULTS: Using a combination of structure-based design and phage display, we have developed a new dimerization system for Cys(2)His(2) zinc fingers that allows the assembly of more than three fingers on a desired target site. Zinc finger constructs employing this new dimerization system have high affinity and good specificity for their target sites both in vitro and in vivo. Constructs that recognize an asymmetric binding site as heterodimers can be obtained through substitutions in the zinc finger and dimerization regions. CONCLUSIONS: Our modular zinc finger dimerization system allows more than three Cys(2)His(2) zinc fingers to be productively assembled on a DNA-binding site. Dimerization may offer certain advantages over covalent linkage for the recognition of large DNA sequences. Our results also illustrate the power of combining structure-based design with phage display in a strategy that assimilates the best features of each method.     

DNA-Binding ability of GAGA zinc finger depends on the nature of amino acids present in the beta-hairpin

The GAGA factor of Drosophila melanogaster uses a single Cys2-His2-type zinc finger for specific DNA binding. Comparative sequence alignment of the GAGA zinc finger core with other structurally characterized zinc fingers reveals that the beta-hairpin of the GAGA zinc finger prefers amino acids with an aliphatic side-chain different from those of other zinc fingers. To probe the substitution effect of aromatic amino acids in the beta-hairpin on the DNA binding, three mutant peptides were designed by substituting consensus phenylalanine, an aromatic amino acid, at key positions in the beta-hairpin region. The metal-binding and the overall fold of the mutant peptides are very similar to those of the wild-type as shown by UV-vis absorption spectroscopy and circular dichroism spectroscopy. However, the gel mobility shift assay and isothermal calorimetric studies demonstrated that none of the mutants are able to bind the cognate DNA substrate, although the mutation is confined only to the beta-hairpin region. The present results suggest that the nature of the amino acids in the beta-hairpin plays an important role in the DNA-binding of the GAGA factor protein.     

Prediction of DNA-binding specificity in zinc finger proteins

Zinc finger proteins interact via their individual fingers to three base pair subsites on the target DNA. The four key residue positions -1, 2, 3 and 6 on the alpha-helix of the zinc fingers have hydrogen bond interactions with the DNA. Mutating these key residues enables generation of a plethora of combinatorial possibilities that can bind to any DNA stretch of interest. Exploiting the binding specificity and affinity of the interaction between the zinc fingers and the respective DNA can help to generate engineered zinc fingers for therapeutic purposes involving genome targeting. Exploring the structure-function relationships of the existing zinc finger-DNA complexes can aid in predicting the probable zinc fingers that could bind to any target DNA. Computational tools ease the prediction of such engineered zinc fingers by effectively utilizing information from the available experimental data. A study of literature reveals many approaches for predicting DNA-binding specificity in zinc finger proteins. However, an alternative approach that looks into the physico-chemical properties of these complexes would do away with the difficulties of designing unbiased zinc fingers with the desired affinity and specificity. We present a physico-chemical approach that exploits the relative strengths of hydrogen bonding between the target DNA and all combinatorially possible zinc fingers to select the most optimum zinc finger protein candidate.     

Validated zinc finger protein designs for all 16 GNN DNA triplet targets.

The Cys(2)-His(2)-type zinc finger DNA-binding proteins can be engineered to bind specifically to many different DNA sequences. A single zinc finger typically binds to a 3-4-base pair DNA subsite. One strategy for design is to identify highly specific fingers that recognize each of the 64 possible DNA triplets. We started with a subgroup of the 64 triplets, the GNN-binding fingers. The GNN-binding fingers have been examined in several studies, but previous studies did not produce specific fingers for all of the 16 GNN triplets. These previous studies did not provide any information on the possible positional or context effects on the performance of these fingers. To identify the most specific design and take the possible positional effects into consideration, we did a large-scale site selection experiment on our GNN designs. From this study, we identified very specific fingers for 14 of the 16 GNN triplets, demonstrating for the first time a clear positional dependence for many of the designs. Further systematic specificity study reveals that the in vivo functionality of these zinc finger proteins in a reporter assay depends on their binding affinities to their target sequences, thus giving a better understanding of how these zinc finger proteins might function inside cells.     

An arginine residue instead of a conserved leucine residue in the recognition helix of the finger 3 of Zif268 stabilizes the domain structure and mediates DNA binding

The Cys(2)His(2)-type zinc finger is a common DNA binding motif that is widely used in the design of artificial zinc finger proteins. In almost all Cys(2)His(2)-type zinc fingers, position 4 of the α-helical DNA-recognition site is occupied by a Leu residue involved in formation of the minimal hydrophobic core. However, the third zinc finger domain of native Zif268 contains an Arg residue instead of the conserved Leu. Our aim in the present study was to clarify the role of this Arg in the formation of a stable domain structure and in DNA binding by substituting it with a Lys, Leu, or Hgn, which have different terminal side-chain structures. Assessed were the metal binding properties, peptide conformations, and DNA-binding abilities of the mutants. All three mutant finger 3 peptides exhibited conformations and thermal stabilities similar to the wild-type peptide. In DNA-binding assays, the Lys mutant bound to target DNA, though its affinity was lower than that of the wild-type peptide. On the other hand, the Leu and Hgn mutants had no ability to bind DNA, despite the similarity in their secondary structures to the wild-type. Our results demonstrate that, as with the Leu residue, the aliphatic carbon side chain of this Arg residue plays a key role in the formation of a stable zinc finger domain, and its terminal guanidinium group appears to be essential for DNA binding mediated through both electrostatic interaction and hydrogen bonding with DNA phosphate backbone.     

Exchange of histidine spacing between Sp1 and GLI zinc fingers: distinct effect of histidine spacing-linker region on DNA binding

In the DNA recognition mode of C(2)H(2)-type zinc fingers, the finger-finger connection region, consisting of the histidine spacing (HX(3-5)H) and linker, would be important for determining the orientation of the zinc finger domains. To clarify the influence of spacing between two ligand histidines in the DNA binding, we exchanged the histidine spacing between Sp1 and GLI zinc fingers, which have an HX(3)H-TGEKK linker (typical) and an HX(4)H-SNEKP linker (atypical), respectively. A significant decrease in the DNA binding affinity and specificity is found in Sp1-type peptides, whereas GLI-type peptides show a mild reduction. To evaluate the effect of the linker characteristics, we further designed Sp1-type mutants with an SNEKP linker. As a result, the significant effect of the histidine spacing in Sp1-type peptides was reduced. These results demonstrate that (1) the histidine spacing significantly affects the DNA binding of zinc finger proteins and (2) the histidine spacing and the following linker regions are one effective target for regulating the DNA recognition mode of zinc finger proteins.