AGenDA: gene prediction by comparative sequence analysis

Comparative sequence analysis is a powerful approach to identify functional elements in genomic sequences. Herein, we describe AGenDA (Alignment-based GENe Detection Algorithm), a novel method for gene prediction that is based on long-range alignment of syntenic regions in eukaryotic genome sequences. Local sequence homologies identified by the DIALIGN program are searched for conserved splice signals to define potential protein-coding exons; these candidate exons are then used to assemble complete gene structures. The performance of our method was tested on a set of 105 human-mouse sequence pairs. These test runs showed that sensitivity and specificity of AGenDA are comparable with the best gene- prediction program that is currently available. However, since our method is based on a completely different type of input information, it can detect genes that are not detectable by standard methods and vice versa. Thus, our approach seems to be a useful addition to existing gene-prediction programs. Availability: DIALIGN is available through the Bielefeld Bioinformatics Server (BiBiServ) at http://bibiserv.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/dialign/ The gene-prediction program AGenDA described in this paper will be available through the BiBiServ or MIPS web server at http://mips.gsf.de.     

AGenDA: homology-based gene prediction

We present a www server for homology-based gene prediction. The user enters a pair of evolutionary related genomic sequences, for example from human and mouse. Our software system uses CHAOS and DIALIGN to calculate an alignment of the input sequences and then searches for conserved splicing signals and start/stop codons around regions of local sequence similarity. This way, candidate exons are identified that are used, in turn, to calculate optimal gene models. The server returns the constructed gene model by email, together with a graphical representation of the underlying genomic alignment.     

MAP2: multiple alignment of syntenic genomic sequences

We describe a multiple alignment program named MAP2 based on a generalized pairwise global alignment algorithm for handling long, different intergenic and intragenic regions in genomic sequences. The MAP2 program produces an ordered list of local multiple alignments of similar regions among sequences, where different regions between local alignments are indicated by reporting only similar regions. We propose two similarity measures for the evaluation of the performance of MAP2 and existing multiple alignment programs. Experimental results produced by MAP2 on four real sets of orthologous genomic sequences show that MAP2 rarely missed a block of transitively similar regions and that MAP2 never produced a block of regions that are not transitively similar. Experimental results by MAP2 on six simulated data sets show that MAP2 found the boundaries between similar and different regions precisely. This feature is useful for finding conserved functional elements in genomic sequences. The MAP2 program is freely available in source code form at http://bioinformatics.iastate.edu/aat/sas.html for academic use.     

Fast and sensitive multiple alignment of large genomic sequences

Background

Genomic sequence alignment is a powerful method for genome analysis and annotation, as alignments are routinely used to identify functional sites such as genes or regulatory elements. With a growing number of partially or completely sequenced genomes, multiple alignment is playing an increasingly important role in these studies. In recent years, various tools for pair-wise and multiple genomic alignment have been proposed. Some of them are extremely fast, but often efficiency is achieved at the expense of sensitivity. One way of combining speed and sensitivity is to use an anchored-alignment approach. In a first step, a fast search program identifies a chain of strong local sequence similarities. In a second step, regions between these anchor points are aligned using a slower but more accurate method.

Results

Herein, we present CHAOS, a novel algorithm for rapid identification of chains of local pair-wise sequence similarities. Local alignments calculated by CHAOS are used as anchor points to improve the running time of DIALIGN, a slow but sensitive multiple-alignment tool. We show that this way, the running time of DIALIGN can be reduced by more than 95% for BAC-sized and longer sequences, without affecting the quality of the resulting alignments. We apply our approach to a set of five genomic sequences around the stem-cell-leukemia (SCL) gene and demonstrate that exons and small regulatory elements can be identified by our multiple-alignment procedure.

Conclusion

We conclude that the novel CHAOS local alignment tool is an effective way to significantly speed up global alignment tools such as DIALIGN without reducing the alignment quality. We likewise demonstrate that the DIALIGN/CHAOS combination is able to accurately align short regulatory sequences in distant orthologues.

     

Combining partial order alignment and progressive multiple sequence alignment increases alignment speed and scalability to very large alignment problems

MOTIVATION: Partial order alignment (POA) has been proposed as a new approach to multiple sequence alignment (MSA), which can be combined with existing methods such as progressive alignment. This is important for addressing problems both in the original version of POA (such as order sensitivity) and in standard progressive alignment programs (such as information loss in complex alignments, especially surrounding gap regions). RESULTS: We have developed a new Partial Order-Partial Order alignment algorithm that optimally aligns a pair of MSAs and which therefore can be applied directly to progressive alignment methods such as CLUSTAL. Using this algorithm, we show the combined Progressive POA alignment method yields results comparable with the best available MSA programs (CLUSTALW, DIALIGN2, T-COFFEE) but is far faster. For example, depending on the level of sequence similarity, aligning 1000 sequences, each 500 amino acids long, took 15 min (at 90% average identity) to 44 min (at 30% identity) on a standard PC. For large alignments, Progressive POA was 10-30 times faster than the fastest of the three previous methods (CLUSTALW). These data suggest that POA-based methods can scale to much larger alignment problems than possible for previous methods. AVAILABILITY: The POA source code is available at http://www.bioinformatics.ucla.edu/poa     

How to usefully compare homologous plant genes and chromosomes as DNA sequences

There are four sequenced and publicly available plant genomes to date. With many more slated for completion, one challenge will be to use comparative genomic methods to detect novel evolutionary patterns in plant genomes. This research requires sequence alignment algorithms to detect regions of similarity within and among genomes. However, different alignment algorithms are optimized for identifying different types of homologous sequences. This review focuses on plant genome evolution and provides a tutorial for using several sequence alignment algorithms and visualization tools to detect useful patterns of conservation: conserved non-coding sequences, false positive noise, subfunctionalization, synteny, annotation errors, inversions and local duplications. Our tutorial encourages the reader to experiment online with the reviewed tools as a companion to the text.     

SCGPred： A Score-based Method for Gene Structure Prediction by Combining Multiple Sources of Evidence

Predicting protein-coding genes still remains a significant challenge. Although a variety of computational programs that use commonly machine learning methods have emerged, the accuracy of predictions remains a low level when implementing in large genomic sequences. Moreover, computational gene finding in newly se- quenced genomes is especially a difficult task due to the absence of a training set of abundant validated genes. Here we present a new gene-finding program, SCGPred, to improve the accuracy of prediction by combining multiple sources of evidence. SCGPred can perform both supervised method in previously well-studied genomes and unsupervised one in novel genomes. By testing with datasets composed of large DNA sequences from human and a novel genome of Ustilago maydi, SCGPred gains a significant improvement in comparison to the popular ab initio gene predictors. We also demonstrate that SCGPred can significantly improve prediction in novel genomes by combining several foreign gene finders with similarity alignments, which is superior to other unsupervised methods. Therefore, SCGPred can serve as an alternative gene-finding tool for newly sequenced eukaryotic genomes. The program is freely available at http：//bio.scu.edu.cn/SCGPred/.     

DIALIGN-TX: greedy and progressive approaches for segment-based multiple sequence alignment

Background  

DIALIGN-T is a reimplementation of the multiple-alignment program DIALIGN. Due to several algorithmic improvements, it produces significantly better alignments on locally and globally related sequence sets than previous versions of DIALIGN. However, like the original implementation of the program, DIALIGN-T uses a a straight-forward greedy approach to assemble multiple alignments from local pairwise sequence similarities. Such greedy approaches may be vulnerable to spurious random similarities and can therefore lead to suboptimal results. In this paper, we present DIALIGN-TX, a substantial improvement of DIALIGN-T that combines our previous greedy algorithm with a progressive alignment approach.     

A generalized global alignment algorithm

MOTIVATION: Homologous sequences are sometimes similar over some regions but different over other regions. Homologous sequences have a much lower global similarity if the different regions are much longer than the similar regions. RESULTS: We present a generalized global alignment algorithm for comparing sequences with intermittent similarities, an ordered list of similar regions separated by different regions. A generalized global alignment model is defined to handle sequences with intermittent similarities. A dynamic programming algorithm is designed to compute an optimal general alignment in time proportional to the product of sequence lengths and in space proportional to the sum of sequence lengths. The algorithm is implemented as a computer program named GAP3 (Global Alignment Program Version 3). The generalized global alignment model is validated by experimental results produced with GAP3 on both DNA and protein sequences. The GAP3 program extends the ability of standard global alignment programs to recognize homologous sequences of lower similarity. AVAILABILITY: The GAP3 program is freely available for academic use at http://bioinformatics.iastate.edu/aat/align/align.html.     

A space-efficient algorithm for aligning large genomic sequences

SUMMARY: In the segment-by-segment approach to sequence alignment, pairwise and multiple alignments are generated by comparing gap-free segments of the sequences under study. This method is particularly efficient in detecting local homologies, and it has been used to identify functional regions in large genomic sequences. Herein, an algorithm is outlined that calculates optimal pairwise segment-by-segment alignments in essentially linear space. AVAILABILTIY: The program is available at the Bielefeld Bioinformatics Server (BiBiServ) at http://bibiserv.techfak. uni-bielefeld.de/dialign/     

Gene structure conservation aids similarity based gene prediction

One of the primary tasks in deciphering the functional contents of a newly sequenced genome is the identification of its protein coding genes. Existing computational methods for gene prediction include ab initio methods which use the DNA sequence itself as the only source of information, comparative methods using multiple genomic sequences, and similarity based methods which employ the cDNA or protein sequences of related genes to aid the gene prediction. We present here an algorithm implemented in a computer program called Projector which combines comparative and similarity approaches. Projector employs similarity information at the genomic DNA level by directly using known genes annotated on one DNA sequence to predict the corresponding related genes on another DNA sequence. It therefore makes explicit use of the conservation of the exon–intron structure between two related genes in addition to the similarity of their encoded amino acid sequences. We evaluate the performance of Projector by comparing it with the program Genewise on a test set of 491 pairs of independently confirmed mouse and human genes. It is more accurate than Genewise for genes whose proteins are <80% identical, and is suitable for use in a combined gene prediction system where other methods identify well conserved and non-conserved genes, and pseudogenes.     

Good spaced seeds for homology search

MOTIVATION: Filtration is an important technique used to speed up local alignment as exemplified in the BLAST programs. Recently, Ma et al. discovered that better filtering can be achieved by spacing out the matching positions according to a certain pattern, instead of contiguous positions to trigger a local alignment in their PatternHunter program. Such a match pattern is called a spaced seed. RESULTS: Our numerical computation shows that the ranks of spaced seeds (based on sensitivity) change with the sequences similarity. Since homologous sequences may have diverse similarity, we assess the sensitivity of spaced seeds over a range of similarity levels and present a list of good spaced seeds for facilitating homology search in DNA genomic sequences. We validate that the listed spaced seeds are indeed more sensitive using three arbitrarily chosen pairs of DNA genomic sequences.     

Genomic multiple sequence alignments: refinement using a genetic algorithm

Background  

Genomic sequence data cannot be fully appreciated in isolation. Comparative genomics – the practice of comparing genomic sequences from different species – plays an increasingly important role in understanding the genotypic differences between species that result in phenotypic differences as well as in revealing patterns of evolutionary relationships. One of the major challenges in comparative genomics is producing a high-quality alignment between two or more related genomic sequences. In recent years, a number of tools have been developed for aligning large genomic sequences. Most utilize heuristic strategies to identify a series of strong sequence similarities, which are then used as anchors to align the regions between the anchor points. The resulting alignment is globally correct, but in many cases is suboptimal locally. We describe a new program, GenAlignRefine, which improves the overall quality of global multiple alignments by using a genetic algorithm to improve local regions of alignment. Regions of low quality are identified, realigned using the program T-Coffee, and then refined using a genetic algorithm. Because a better COFFEE (Consistency based Objective Function For alignmEnt Evaluation) score generally reflects greater alignment quality, the algorithm searches for an alignment that yields a better COFFEE score. To improve the intrinsic slowness of the genetic algorithm, GenAlignRefine was implemented as a parallel, cluster-based program.     

A new approach to sequence comparison: normalized sequence alignment

The Smith-Waterman algorithm for local sequence alignment is one of the most important techniques in computational molecular biology. This ingenious dynamic programming approach was designed to reveal the highly conserved fragments by discarding poorly conserved initial and terminal segments. However, the existing notion of local similarity has a serious flaw: it does not discard poorly conserved intermediate segments. The Smith-Waterman algorithm finds the local alignment with maximal score but it is unable to find local alignment with maximum degree of similarity (e.g. maximal percent of matches). Moreover, there is still no efficient algorithm that answers the following natural question: do two sequences share a (sufficiently long) fragment with more than 70% of similarity? As a result, the local alignment sometimes produces a mosaic of well-conserved fragments artificially connected by poorly-conserved or even unrelated fragments. This may lead to problems in comparison of long genomic sequences and comparative gene prediction as recently pointed out by Zhang et al. (Bioinformatics, 15, 1012-1019, 1999). In this paper we propose a new sequence comparison algorithm (normalized local alignment ) that reports the regions with maximum degree of similarity. The algorithm is based on fractional programming and its running time is O(n2log n). In practice, normalized local alignment is only 3-5 times slower than the standard Smith-Waterman algorithm.     

AuberGene--a sensitive genome alignment tool

MOTIVATION: The accumulation of genome sequences will only accelerate in the coming years. We aim to use this abundance of data to improve the quality of genomic alignments and devise a method which is capable of detecting regions evolving under weak or no evolutionary constraints. RESULTS: We describe a genome alignment program AuberGene, which explores the idea of transitivity of local alignments. Assessment of the program was done based on a 2 Mbp genomic region containing the CFTR gene of 13 species. In this region, we can identify 53% of human sequence sharing common ancestry with mouse, as compared with 44% found using the usual pairwise alignment. Between human and tetraodon 93 orthologous exons are found, as compared with 77 detected by the pairwise human-tetraodon comparison. AuberGene allows the user to (1) identify distant, previously undetected, conserved orthogonal regions such as ORFs or regulatory regions; (2) identify neutrally evolving regions in related species which are often overlooked by other alignment programs; (3) recognize false orthologous genomic regions. The increased sensitivity of the method is not obtained at the cost of reduced specificity. Our results suggest that, over the CFTR region, human shares 10% more sequence with mouse than previously thought ( approximately 50%, instead of 40% found with the pairwise alignment).     

RNA secondary structure, an important bioinformatics tool to enhance multiple sequence alignment: a case study (Sordariomycetes, Fungi)

In a case study of fungi of the class Sordariomycetes, we evaluated the effect of multiple sequence alignment (MSA) on the reliability of the phylogenetic trees, topology and confidence of major phylogenetic clades. We compared two main approaches for constructing MSA based on (1) the knowledge of the secondary (2D) structure of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes, and (2) automatic construction of MSA by four alignment programs characterized by different algorithms and evaluation methods, CLUSTAL, MAFFT, MUSCLE, and SAM. In the primary fungal sequences of the two functional rRNA genes, the nuclear small and large ribosomal subunits (18 S and 28 S), we identified four and six, respectively, highly variable regions, which correspond mainly to hairpin loops in the 2D structure. These loops are often positioned in expansion segments, which are missing or are not completely developed in the Archaeal and Eubacterial kingdoms. Proper sorting of these sites was a key for constructing an accurate MSA. We utilized DNA sequences from 28 S as an example for one-gene analysis. Five different MSAs were created and analyzed with maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood methods. The phylogenies inferred from the alignments improved with 2D structure with identified homologous segments, and those constructed using the MAFFT alignment program, with all highly variable regions included, provided the most reliable phylograms with higher bootstrap support for the majority of clades. We illustrate and provide examples demonstrating that re-evaluating ambiguous positions in the consensus sequences using 2D structure and covariance is a promising means in order to improve the quality and reliability of sequence alignments.     

FBSA: feature-based sequence alignment technique for very large sequences

The ability to align pairs of very large molecular sequences is essential for a range of comparative genomic studies. However, given the complexity of genomic sequences, it has been difficult to devise a systematic method that can align - even within the same species - pairs of large sequences. Most existing approaches typically attempt to align nucleotide sequences while ignoring valuable features contained within them, eg they filter out low-complexity regions and retroelements before aligning the sequences. However, features are then added post-alignment for visualisation and analysis purposes. We argue that repetitive elements and other features (such as genes, exons and regulatory elements) should be part of the alignment process. A hierarchical approach that aligns the biologically relevant features before aligning the detailed nucleotide sequences has a number of interesting characteristics: (1) features define 'alignment anchor points' that can guide meaningful nucleotide alignment; (2) features can be weighted; (3) a hierarchical approach would identify only meaningful regions to be aligned; (4) nucleotide sequences can be described as sequences of features and non-features, providing a natural mechanism to divide the sequences for processing; and (5) computational speed is significantly faster than other approaches. In this paper, we describe and discuss a feature-based approach to aligning large genome sequences. We refer to this as 'feature-based sequence alignment'.     

Mind the gaps: evidence of bias in estimates of multiple sequence alignments

Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) is a crucial first step in the analysis of genomic and proteomic data. Commonly occurring sequence features, such as deletions and insertions, are known to affect the accuracy of MSA programs, but the extent to which alignment accuracy is affected by the positions of insertions and deletions has not been examined independently of other sources of sequence variation. We assessed the performance of 6 popular MSA programs (ClustalW, DIALIGN-T, MAFFT, MUSCLE, PROBCONS, and T-COFFEE) and one experimental program, PRANK, on amino acid sequences that differed only by short regions of deleted residues. The analysis showed that the absence of residues often led to an incorrect placement of gaps in the alignments, even though the sequences were otherwise identical. In data sets containing sequences with partially overlapping deletions, most MSA programs preferentially aligned the gaps vertically at the expense of incorrectly aligning residues in the flanking regions. Of the programs assessed, only DIALIGN-T was able to place overlapping gaps correctly relative to one another, but this was usually context dependent and was observed only in some of the data sets. In data sets containing sequences with non-overlapping deletions, both DIALIGN-T and MAFFT (G-INS-I) were able to align gaps with near-perfect accuracy, but only MAFFT produced the correct alignment consistently. The same was true for data sets that comprised isoforms of alternatively spliced gene products: both DIALIGN-T and MAFFT produced highly accurate alignments, with MAFFT being the more consistent of the 2 programs. Other programs, notably T-COFFEE and ClustalW, were less accurate. For all data sets, alignments produced by different MSA programs differed markedly, indicating that reliance on a single MSA program may give misleading results. It is therefore advisable to use more than one MSA program when dealing with sequences that may contain deletions or insertions, particularly for high-throughput and pipeline applications where manual refinement of each alignment is not practicable.