Role of pseudorabies virus Us9, a type II membrane protein, in infection of tissue culture cells and the rat nervous system

The protein product of the pseudorabies virus (PRV) Us9 gene is a phosphorylated, type II membrane protein that is inserted into virion envelopes and accumulates in the trans-Golgi network. It is among a linked group of three envelope protein genes in the unique short region of the PRV genome which are absent from the attenuated Bartha strain. We found that two different Us9 null mutants exhibited no obvious phenotype after infection of PK15 cells in culture. Unlike those of gE and gI null mutants, the plaque size of Us9 null mutants on Madin-Darby bovine kidney cells was indistinguishable from that of wild-type virus. However, both of the Us9 null mutants exhibited a defect in anterograde spread in the visual and cortical circuitry of the rat. The visual system defect was characterized by restricted infection of a functionally distinct subset of visual projections involved in the temporal organization of behavior, whereas decreased anterograde spread of virus to the cortical projection targets was characteristic of animals receiving direct injections of virus into the cortex. Spread of virus through retrograde pathways in the brain was not compromised by a Us9 deletion. The virulence of the Us9 null mutants, as measured by time to death and appearance of symptoms of infection, also was reduced after their injection into the eye, but not after cortical injection. Through sequence analysis, construction of revertants, measurement of gE and gI protein synthesis in the Us9 null mutants, and mixed-infection studies of rats, we conclude that the restricted-spread phenotype after infection of the rat nervous system reflects the loss of Us9 and is not an indirect effect of the Us9 mutations on expression of glycoproteins gE and gI. Therefore, at least three viral envelope proteins, Us9, gE, and gI, function together to promote efficient anterograde transneuronal infection by PRV in the rat central nervous system.     

A Chicken Embryo Eye Model for the Analysis of Alphaherpesvirus Neuronal Spread and Virulence

We describe use of developing chicken embryos as a model to study neuronal spread and virulence of pseudorabies virus (PRV). At embryonic day 12, β-galactosidase-expressing PRV strains were injected into the vitreous humor of one eye, and virus replication and spread from the eye to the brain were measured by β-galactosidase activity and the recovery of infectious virus from tissues. The wild-type PRV strain, Becker, replicated in the eye and then spread to the brain, causing extensive pathology characterized by edema, hemorrhage, and necrosis that localized to virally infected tissue. The attenuated vaccine strain, Bartha, replicated in the eye and spread throughout specific regions of the brain, producing little to no overt pathology. Becker mutants lacking membrane proteins gE or gI replicated in the eye and were able to spread to the brain efficiently. The pathology associated with replication of these mutants in the brain was intermediate to that induced by Becker or Bartha. Mixed infection of a gE deletion mutant and a gI deletion mutant restored the pathogenic phenotype to wild-type levels. These data indicate that the replication of virus in embryonic brain tissue is not sufficient to induce the characteristic pathological response and that the gE and gI gene products actively affect pathological responses in the developing chicken brain.     

Cytoplasmic residues of herpes simplex virus glycoprotein gE required for secondary envelopment and binding of tegument proteins VP22 and UL11 to gE and gD

The final assembly of herpes simplex virus (HSV) involves binding of tegument-coated capsids to viral glycoprotein-enriched regions of the trans-Golgi network (TGN) as enveloped virions bud into TGN membranes. We previously demonstrated that HSV glycoproteins gE/gI and gD, acting in a redundant fashion, are essential for this secondary envelopment. To define regions of the cytoplasmic (CT) domain of gE required for secondary envelopment, HSVs lacking gD and expressing truncated gE molecules were constructed. A central region (amino acids 470 to 495) of the gE CT domain was important for secondary envelopment, although more C-terminal residues also contributed. Tandem affinity purification (TAP) proteins including fragments of the gE CT domain were used to identify tegument proteins VP22 and UL11 as binding partners, and gE CT residues 470 to 495 were important in this binding. VP22 and UL11 were precipitated from HSV-infected cells in conjunction with full-length gE and gE molecules with more-C-terminal residues of the CT domain. gD also bound VP22 and UL11. Expression of VP22 and gD or gE/gI in cells by use of adenovirus (Ad) vectors provided evidence that other viral proteins were not necessary for tegument/glycoprotein interactions. Substantial quantities of VP22 and UL11 bound nonspecifically onto or were precipitated with gE and gD molecules lacking all CT sequences, something that is very unlikely in vivo. VP16 was precipitated equally whether gE/gI or gD was present in extracts or not. These observations illustrated important properties of tegument proteins. VP22, UL11, and VP16 are highly prone to binding nonspecifically to other proteins, and this did not represent insolubility during our assays. Rather, it likely reflects an inherent "stickiness" related to the formation of tegument. Nevertheless, assays involving TAP proteins and viral proteins expressed by HSV and Ad vectors supported the conclusion that VP22 and UL11 interact specifically with the CT domains of gD and gE.     

Mutation of the YXXL endocytosis motif in the cytoplasmic tail of pseudorabies virus gE

The role of alphaherpesvirus membrane protein internalization during the course of viral infection remains a matter of speculation. To determine the role of internalization of the pseudorabies virus (PRV) gE and gI proteins, we constructed viral mutants encoding specific mutations in the cytoplasmic tail of the gE gene that inhibited internalization of the gE-gI complex. We used these mutants to assess the role of gE-gI endocytosis in incorporation of the proteins into the viral envelope and in gE-mediated spread or gE-promoted virulence. In addition, we report that another viral mutant, PRV 25, which encodes a gE protein defective in endocytosis, contains an additional, previously uncharacterized mutation in the gE gene. We compared PRV 25 to another viral mutant, PRV 107, that does not express the cytoplasmic tail of the gE protein. The gE protein encoded by PRV 107 is also defective in endocytosis. We conclude that efficient endocytosis of gE is not required for gE incorporation into virions, gE-mediated virulence, or spread of virus in the rat central nervous system. However, we do correlate the defect in endocytosis to a small-plaque phenotype in cultured cells.     

Actin is a component of the compensation mechanism in pseudorabies virus virions lacking the major tegument protein VP22

Despite being a major component of the pseudorabies virus tegument, VP22 is not required for PRV replication, virulence, or neuroinvasion (T. del Rio, H. C. Werner, and L. W. Enquist, J. Virol. 76:774-782, 2002). In the absence of VP22, tegument assembly compensates in a limited fashion with increased incorporation of cellular actin. Infection of epithelial cell lines expressing fluorescent actin fusion proteins resulted in the incorporation of filamentous and nonfilamentous actin into individual virions that were predominately light, noninfectious particles. We conclude that cellular actin is incorporated in the tegument of wild-type virions and is part of a compensation mechanism for VP22-null virions.     

Insertions in the gG gene of pseudorabies virus reduce expression of the upstream Us3 protein and inhibit cell-to-cell spread of virus infection

The alphaherpesvirus Us4 gene encodes glycoprotein G (gG), which is conserved in most viruses of the alphaherpesvirus subfamily. In the swine pathogen pseudorabies virus (PRV), mutant viruses with internal deletions and insertions in the gG gene have shown no discernible phenotypes. We report that insertions in the gG locus of the attenuated PRV strain Bartha show reduced virulence in vivo and are defective in their ability to spread from cell to cell in a cell-type-specific manner. Similar insertions in the gG locus of the wild-type PRV strain Becker had no effect on the ability of virus infection to spread between cells. Insertions in the gG locus of the virulent NIA-3 strain gave results similar to those found with the Bartha strain. To examine the role of gG in cell-to-cell spread, a nonsense mutation in the gG signal sequence was constructed and crossed into the Bartha strain. This mutant, PRV157, failed to express gG yet had cell-to-cell spread properties indistinguishable from those of the parental Bartha strain. These data indicated that, while insertions in the gG locus result in decreased cell-to-cell spread, the phenotype was not due to loss of gG expression as first predicted. Analysis of gene expression upstream and downstream of gG revealed that expression of the upstream Us3 protein is reduced by insertion of lacZ or egfp at the gG locus. By contrast, expression of the gene immediately downstream of gG, Us6, which encodes glycoprotein gD, was not affected by insertions in gG. These data indicate that DNA insertions in gG have polar effects and suggest that the serine/threonine kinase encoded by the Us3 gene, and not gG, functions in the spread of viral infection between cells.     

Pseudorabies virus envelope glycoprotein gI influences both neurotropism and virulence during infection of the rat visual system.

We previously demonstrated that intraocular injections of virulent and attenuated strains of pseudorabies virus (PRV) produce transneuronal infection of functionally distinct central visual circuits in the rat. The virulent Becker strain of PRV induces two temporally separated waves of infection that ultimately target all known retinorecipient neurons; the attenuated Bartha strain only infects a functionally distinct subset of these neurons. In this study, we demonstrate that deletion of a single viral gene encoding glycoprotein gI is sufficient to reproduce both the novel pattern of infectivity and the reduced neurovirulence of the Bartha strain of PRV. Glycoprotein gIII, a major viral membrane protein required for efficient adsorption of virus in cell culture, has no obvious role in determining the pattern of neuronal infectivity, but appears to function with gI to influence neurovirulence. These data suggest that neuroinvasiveness and virulence are the products of an interaction of viral envelope glycoproteins with as yet unidentified cellular receptors.     

A Network of Protein Interactions around the Herpes Simplex Virus Tegument Protein VP22

Assembly of the herpesvirus tegument is poorly understood but is believed to involve interactions between outer tegument proteins and the cytoplasmic domains of envelope glycoproteins. Here, we present the detailed characterization of a multicomponent glycoprotein-tegument complex found in herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1)-infected cells. We demonstrate that the tegument protein VP22 bridges a complex between glycoprotein E (gE) and glycoprotein M (gM). Glycoprotein I (gI), the known binding partner of gE, is also recruited into this gE-VP22-gM complex but is not required for its formation. Exclusion of the glycoproteins gB and gD and VP22''s major binding partner VP16 demonstrates that recruitment of virion components into this complex is highly selective. The immediate-early protein ICP0, which requires VP22 for packaging into the virion, is also assembled into this gE-VP22-gM-gI complex in a VP22-dependent fashion. Although subcomplexes containing VP22 and ICP0 can be formed when either gE or gM are absent, optimal complex formation requires both glycoproteins. Furthermore, and in line with complex formation, neither of these glycoproteins is individually required for VP22 or ICP0 packaging into the virion, but deletion of gE and gM greatly reduces assembly of both VP22 and ICP0. Double deletion of gE and gM also results in small plaque size, reduced virus yield, and defective secondary envelopment, similar to the phenotype previously shown for pseudorabies virus. Hence, we suggest that optimal gE-VP22-gM-gI-ICP0 complex formation correlates with efficient virus morphogenesis and spread. These data give novel insights into the poorly understood process of tegument acquisition.     

伪狂犬病毒gI基因的克隆表达及其对病毒增殖的影响

从伪狂犬病毒(PRV)国内地方分离Ea株基因组DNA片段中克隆了完整的gI基因,序列分析结果表明,gI基因编码区全长1101bp,可编码366个氨基酸残基,二级结构预测具有典型I型膜蛋白特征。与GenBank中收录的国外Rice株的同源比较发现,Ea株gI在核苷酸和氨基酸水平上均存在多处突变,尤其是潜在胞浆区中连续两个碱基的缺失导致移码突变,致使gI基因的读码框架后移,从而导致Ea株gI较rice株长16个氨基酸残基。将gI基因克隆到真核表达载体pcDNA31+中的人巨细胞病毒早期启动子下游,构建的真核表达质粒转染PK15细胞,间接免疫荧光检测证实gI获得正确表达。进一步测定天然缺失gI的PRV弱毒Bartha株在表达gI细胞系和空白载体转染的对照细胞系中的蚀斑形成单位(pfu)和组织细胞培养半数感染量(TCID50),结果显示：Bartha株在表达gI细胞系中的pfu和TCID\-\{50\}分别为对照细胞系的164%和200%。说明gI具有促进病毒增殖的功能。     

The pseudorabies virus Us2 protein, a virion tegument component, is prenylated in infected cells

The Us2 gene is conserved among alphaherpesviruses, but its function is not known. We demonstrate here that the pseudorabies virus (PRV) Us2 protein is synthesized early after infection and localizes to cytoplasmic vesicles and to the plasma membrane, despite the lack of a recognizable signal sequence or membrane-spanning domain. Us2 protein is also packaged as part of the tegument of mature virions. The Us2 carboxy-terminal four amino acids comprise a CAAX motif, a well-characterized signal for protein prenylation. Treatment of infected cells with lovastatin, a drug that disrupts protein prenylation, changed the relative electrophoretic mobility of Us2 in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels. In addition, lovastatin treatment caused a dramatic relocalization of Us2 to cytoplasmic punctate structures associated with microtubules, which appeared to concentrate over the microtubule organizing center. When the CAAX motif was changed to GAAX and the mutant protein was synthesized from an expression plasmid, it concentrated in punctate cytoplasmic structures reminiscent of Us2 localization in infected cells treated with lovastatin. We suggest that prenylation of PRV Us2 protein is required for proper membrane association. Curiously, the Us2 protein isolated from purified virions does not appear to be prenylated. This is the first report to describe the prenylation of an alphaherpesvirus protein.     

Virion Incorporation of the Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Tegument Protein VP22 Occurs via Glycoprotein E-Specific Recruitment to the Late Secretory Pathway

The mechanism by which herpesviruses acquire their tegument is not yet clear. One model is that outer tegument proteins are recruited by the cytoplasmic tails of viral glycoproteins. In the case of herpes simplex virus tegument protein VP22, interactions with the glycoproteins gE and gD have been shown. We have previously shown that the C-terminal half of VP22 contains the necessary signal for assembly into the virus. Here, we show that during infection VP22 interacts with gE and gM, as well as its tegument partner VP16. However, by using a range of techniques we were unable to demonstrate VP22 binding to gD. By using pulldown assays, we show that while the cytoplasmic tails of both gE and gM interact with VP22, only gE interacts efficiently with the C-terminal packaging domain of VP22. Furthermore, gE but not gM can recruit VP22 to the Golgi/trans-Golgi network region of the cell in the absence of other virus proteins. To examine the role of the gE-VP22 interaction in infection, we constructed a recombinant virus expressing a mutant VP22 protein with a 14-residue deletion that is unable to bind gE (ΔgEbind). Coimmunoprecipitation assays confirmed that this variant of VP22 was unable to complex with gE. Moreover, VP22 was no longer recruited to its characteristic cytoplasmic trafficking complexes but exhibited a diffuse localization. Importantly, packaging of this variant into virions was abrogated. The mutant virus exhibited poor growth in epithelial cells, similar to the defect we have observed for a VP22 knockout virus. These results suggest that deletion of just 14 residues from the VP22 protein is sufficient to inhibit binding to gE and hence recruitment to the viral envelope and assembly into the virus, resulting in a growth phenotype equivalent to that produced by deleting the entire reading frame.The herpesvirus tegument is the virion compartment located between the DNA-containing capsid and the virus envelope (6). Although it is well defined that the viral capsid assembles in the nucleus (37, 38) and the viral envelope is acquired from cellular membranes (3, 24), the mechanism of tegument protein acquisition is still to be established. At least 20 virus-encoded components are recruited into the herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) tegument (32), and there is increasing evidence to suggest that subsets of these proteins may be added as assembly progresses along the maturation pathway (28). To ensure efficient incorporation, it is likely that individual tegument proteins are specifically targeted to their cellular site of recruitment. Such targeting could involve interaction with a viral partner, a cellular partner, or both. A clearer understanding of how individual tegument proteins are acquired by newly assembling virions will help to define the herpesvirus assembly pathway.A number of protein-protein interactions between individual tegument proteins (13, 40, 42), and between tegument proteins and glycoproteins (19, 20, 22, 32), have been described that may provide useful insight into the assembly process. In particular, the interaction of tegument proteins with the cytoplasmic tails of virus glycoproteins provides an attractive mechanism for the virion recruitment of at least the outer components of the tegument. In the case of VP22, the homologues from pseudorabies virus (PRV) and HSV-1 have been shown to interact with the cytoplasmic tail of gE (19, 20, 32). However, the role of this interaction in virus infection has not yet been clearly defined and the fact that additional glycoprotein interactions have been described, with gM in the case of PRV and gD in the case of HSV-1, may point to potential redundancy in the mechanism of VP22 packaging (4, 19, 20). In addition, we and others have previously shown that HSV-1 VP22 interacts directly with a second tegument protein, namely, VP16 (13, 33), an interaction that could provide an alternative route for VP22 to enter the virion. In a previous study, we concluded that the region of VP22 containing its VP16 interaction domain was required but not sufficient for optimal VP22 packaging into the assembling virion, with an additional C-terminal determinant also involved (23). We also demonstrated that the same region of VP22 that was required for virion packaging was essential to target the protein to its characteristic cytoplasmic trafficking complexes, suggesting that these specific sites may be the location in the cell for VP22 assembly into the virion (23). Since that study, O''Regan and coworkers have reported that the C-terminal half of HSV-1 VP22 also contains the binding site for gE (32), providing a possible candidate for an additional VP22 binding partner. Furthermore, as HSV-1 VP22 has been shown to bind to gD and PRV VP22 interacts with gM, it is possible that the C terminus of VP22 contains a gD and/or a gM binding site (4, 20).In the present study, we aimed to clarify the molecular mechanism by which VP22 is recruited into the virus particle. We show that HSV-1 VP22 binds efficiently to VP16, gE, and gM in the infected cell, but we cannot detect an interaction with gD. We show that the packaging domain of VP22 binds to the cytoplasmic tail of gE but not gM and that the same region of VP22 is recruited to the secretory pathway by gE in the absence of other virus proteins. Finally, we show that a mutant VP22 protein lacking a 14-residue peptide from its packaging domain is unable to interact with gE during infection, exhibits a different subcellular localization, and fails to assemble into the virus particle. This is the first characterization of a single protein-protein interaction essential for the packaging of an HSV-1 tegument protein.     

Role of pseudorabies virus glycoprotein gI in virus release from infected cells.

The Bartha vaccine strain of pseudorabies virus has a deletion in the short unique (Us) region of its genome which includes the genes that code for glycoproteins gI and gp63 (E. Petrovskis, J. G. Timmins, T. M. Gierman, and L. E. Post, J. Virol. 60:1166-1169, 1986). Restoration of an intact Us to the Bartha strain enhances its ability to be released from infected rabbit kidney cells and increases the size of the plaques formed on these cells (T. Ben-Porat, J. M. DeMarchi, J. Pendrys, R. A. Veach, and A. S. Kaplan, J. Virol. 57:191-196, 1986). To determine which gene function plays a role in virus release from rabbit kidney cells, deletions were introduced into the genomes of both wild-type virus and the "rescued" Bartha strain (Bartha strain to which an intact Us had been restored) that abolish the expression of either the gI gene alone or both gI and gp63 genes. The effect of these deletions on the phenotype of the viruses was studied. Deletion mutants of wild-type virus defective in either gI or gI and gp63 behave like wild-type virus with respect to virus release and plaque size on rabbit kidney cells. Deletion of gI from the rescued Bartha strain, however, strongly affects virus release and causes a decrease in plaque size. We conclude that gI affects virus release but that at least one other viral function also affects this process. This function is defective in the Bartha strain but not in wild-type virus; in its absence gI is essential to efficient release of the virus from rabbit kidney cells.     

Proteins specified by the short unique region of the genome of pseudorabies virus play a role in the release of virions from certain cells.

Two pseudorabies virus vaccine strains (Bartha and Norden) that have a similar deletion in the short unique (Us) region of the genome have been identified previously (B. Lomniczi, M. L. Blankenship, and T. Ben-Porat, J. Virol. 49:970-979, 1984). These strains do not code for the glycoprotein gI, a glycoprotein that has been mapped on the wild type virus genome by T. C. Mettenleiter, N. Lukacs, and H. J. Rziha (J. Virol. 53:52-57, 1985) to the sequences deleted from the vaccine strain. Restoration of these deleted sequences to the Bartha strain genome restores to the virus the ability to specify the gI glycoprotein. The Bartha vaccine strain grows as well as wild-type virus in pig kidney and in rabbit kidney (RK) cells, but is not released efficiently from and forms small plaques in RK cells. The rescued Bartha 43/25a strain (which has an intact Us) is released considerably more efficiently than the Bartha vaccine strain, but less efficiently than wild-type virus from RK cells; it also forms larger plaques on RK cells than does the parental Bartha vaccine strain. The Norden vaccine strain, which has a deletion in the Us, is released better from RK cells than is the Bartha strain, but not as well as is wild-type virus. We conclude that whereas the sequences in the Us that are deleted from the Bartha and Norden strain genomes specify functions that play a role in the release of virions from some cell types, at least one other function (which is defective in the Bartha strain but not in the Norden strain) also affects release of virus from these cells. Since restoration to the Bartha strain of an intact Us restores to the virus both the ability to grow in chicken brains (B. Lomniczi, S. Watanabe, T. Ben-Porat, and A. S. Kaplan, J. Virol. 52:198-205, 1984) and to be released from RK cells, the possibility that the lack of virulence of the Bartha vaccine strain may be related to its limited release from some target cells is discussed.     

Herpes simplex virus glycoproteins gD and gE/gI serve essential but redundant functions during acquisition of the virion envelope in the cytoplasm

The late stages of assembly of herpes simplex virus (HSV) and other herpesviruses are not well understood. Acquisition of the final virion envelope apparently involves interactions between viral nucleocapsids coated with tegument proteins and the cytoplasmic domains of membrane glycoproteins. This promotes budding of virus particles into cytoplasmic vesicles derived from the trans-Golgi network or endosomes. The identities of viral membrane glycoproteins and tegument proteins involved in these processes are not well known. Here, we report that HSV mutants lacking two viral glycoproteins, gD and gE, accumulated large numbers of unenveloped nucleocapsids in the cytoplasm. These aggregated capsids were immersed in an electron-dense layer that appeared to be tegument. Few or no enveloped virions were observed. More subtle defects were observed with an HSV unable to express gD and gI. A triple mutant lacking gD, gE, and gI exhibited more severe defects in envelopment. We concluded that HSV gD and the gE/gI heterodimeric complex act in a redundant fashion to anchor the virion envelope onto tegument-coated capsids. In the absence of either one of these HSV glycoproteins, envelopment proceeds; however, without both gD and gE, or gE/gI, there is profound inhibition of cytoplasmic envelopment.     

Glycoprotein D-negative pseudorabies virus can spread transneuronally via direct neuron-to-neuron transmission in its natural host, the pig, but not after additional inactivation of gE or gI.

Envelope glycoprotein D (gD) is essential for entry of pseudorabies virus (PRV) into cells but is not required for the subsequent steps in virus replication. Phenotypically complemented gD mutants can infect cells and can spread, both in vitro and in mice, by direct cell-to-cell transmission. Progeny virions released by infected cells are noninfectious because they lack gD. The aim of this study was to determine the role of gD in the neuropathogenicity of PRV in its natural host, the pig. We investigated whether gD-negative PRV can spread transneuronally via synaptically linked neurons of the olfactory and trigeminal routes. High doses of a phenotypically complemented gD mutant and gD mutants that are unable to express either gI or gI plus gE were inoculated intranasally in 3- to 5-week-old pigs. Compared with the wild-type virus, the virulence of the gD mutant was reduced. However, pigs inoculated with the gD mutant still developed fever and respiratory signs. Additional inactivation of either gI or gI plus gE further decreased virulence for pigs. Immunohistochemical examination of infected pigs showed that a PRV gD mutant could replicate and spread transneuronally into the central nervous system (CNS). Compared with the wild-type virus, the gD mutant had infected fewer neurons of the CNS on day 2. Nevertheless, on day 3, the gD-negative PRV had infected more neurons and viral antigens were present in second- and third-order neurons in the olfactory bulb, brain stem, and medulla oblongata. In contrast, gD mutants which are unable to express either gI or gI plus gE infected a limited number of first-order neurons in the olfactory epithelium and in the trigeminal ganglion and did not spread transneuronally or infect the CNS. Thus, transsynaptic spread of PRV in pigs can occur independently of gD. Possible mechanisms of transsynaptic transport of PRV are discussed.     

The gE and gI homologs from two alphaherpesviruses have conserved and divergent neuroinvasive properties.

The membrane glycoproteins gE and gI are encoded by pseudorabies virus (PRV), a neurotropic, broad-host-range alphaherpesvirus of swine. PRV gE and gI are required for anterograde spread to a restricted set of retinorecipient neurons in the brain after infection of the rat retina. A related alphaherpesvirus, encoding gE and gI homologs, is called bovine herpesvirus 1.1 (BHV-1.1). BHV-1.1 is a respiratory pathogen of highly restricted host range and, in contrast to PRV, is unable to propagate in or cause disease in rodents. We have shown previously that the BHV-1.1 gE and gI proteins are capable of complementing the virulence functions of PRV gE and gI in a rodent model (A. C. Knapp and L. W. Enquist, J. Virol. 71:2731-2739, 1997). We examined the ability of the BHV-1.1 gE and gI homologs to direct circuit-specific invasion of the rat central nervous system by PRV. Both complete open reading frames were cloned into a PRV mutant lacking the PRV gE and gI genes. Recombinant viruses were analyzed for the ability to invade the rat brain after infection of the retina. Surprisingly, in a portion of the animals tested, the BHV-1.1 gE and gI proteins functioned autonomously to promote spread of PRV to a subset of retinorecipient regions of the brain. First, the presence of BHV-1.1 gI alone, but not PRV gI alone, promoted viral invasion of the optic tectum. Second, expression of BHV-1.1 gE alone facilitated PRV infection of a subset of neurons in the hippocampus not normally infected by PRV. When both BHV-1.1 proteins were expressed in a coinfection, all retinorecipient regions of the rat brain were infected. Therefore, depending on the viral source, homologs of gE and gI differentially affect spread between synaptically connected neurons in the rat.     

Pseudorabies virus recombinants expressing functional virulence determinants gE and gI from bovine herpesvirus 1.1.

In the Alphaherpesvirinae subfamily, the gE and gI genes are conserved and encode membrane glycoproteins required for efficient pathogenesis (virulence). The molecular mechanism(s) responsible is not well understood, but the existence of similar phenotypes of gE and gI mutations in diverse Alphaherpesvirinae implies conservation of function(s). In this report, we describe construction of pseudorabies virus (PRV) recombinants that efficiently express the bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV-1) membrane proteins gI and gE at the PRV gG locus. Each BHV-1 gene was cloned in a PRV mutant lacking both the PRV gI and gE coding sequences. All recombinant viruses expressed the BHV-1 proteins at levels similar to or greater than that observed after infection with parental BHV-1, and there were no observable differences in processing or ability to form gE-gI oligomers. The important observation resulting from this report is that the BHV-1 gE and gI proteins functioned together to complement the virulence defect of PRV lacking its own gE and gI genes in a rodent model, despite being derived from a highly restricted host range virus with a different pathogenic profile.     

Herpes simplex virus gE/gI sorts nascent virions to epithelial cell junctions, promoting virus spread

Alphaherpesviruses spread rapidly through dermal tissues and within synaptically connected neuronal circuitry. Spread of virus particles in epithelial tissues involves movement across cell junctions. Herpes simplex virus (HSV), varicella-zoster virus (VZV), and pseudorabies virus (PRV) all utilize a complex of two glycoproteins, gE and gI, to move from cell to cell. HSV gE/gI appears to function primarily, if not exclusively, in polarized cells such as epithelial cells and neurons and not in nonpolarized cells or cells that form less extensive cell junctions. Here, we show that HSV particles are specifically sorted to cell junctions and few virions reach the apical surfaces of polarized epithelial cells. gE/gI participates in this sorting. Mutant HSV virions lacking gE or just the cytoplasmic domain of gE were rarely found at cell junctions; instead, they were found on apical surfaces and in cell culture fluids and accumulated in the cytoplasm. A component of the AP-1 clathrin adapter complexes, mu1B, that is involved in sorting of proteins to basolateral surfaces was involved in targeting of PRV particles to lateral surfaces. These results are related to recent observations that (i) HSV gE/gI localizes specifically to the trans-Golgi network (TGN) during early phases of infection but moves out to cell junctions at intermediate to late times (T. McMillan and D. C. Johnson, J. Virol., in press) and (ii) PRV gE/gI participates in envelopment of nucleocapsids into cytoplasmic membrane vesicles (A. R. Brack, B. G. Klupp, H. Granzow, R. Tirabassi, L. W. Enquist, and T. C. Mettenleiter, J. Virol. 74:4004-4016, 2000). Therefore, interactions between the cytoplasmic domains of gE/gI and the AP-1 cellular sorting machinery cause glycoprotein accumulation and envelopment into specific TGN compartments that are sorted to lateral cell surfaces. Delivery of virus particles to cell junctions would be expected to enhance virus spread and enable viruses to avoid host immune defenses.     

Pseudorabies virus membrane proteins gI and gE facilitate anterograde spread of infection in projection-specific neurons in the rat

The membrane proteins gI and gE of Pseudorabies virus (PRV) are required for viral invasion and spread through some neural pathways of the rodent central nervous system. Following infection of the rat retina with wild-type PRV, virus replicates in retinal ganglion neurons and anterogradely spreads to infect all visual centers in the brain. By contrast, gI and gE null mutants do not infect a specific subset of the visual centers, e.g., the superior colliculus and the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. In previous experiments, we suggested that the defect was not due to inability to infect projection-specific retinal ganglion cells, because mixed infection of a gE deletion mutant and a gI deletion mutant restored the wild-type phenotype (i.e., genetic complementation occurred). In the present study, we provide direct evidence that gE and gI function to promote the spread of infection after entry into primary neurons. We used stereotaxic central nervous system injection of a fluorescent retrograde tracer into the superior colliculus and subsequent inoculation of a PRV gI-gE double null mutant into the eye of the same animal to demonstrate that viral antigen and fluorescent tracer colocalize in retinal ganglion cells. Furthermore, we demonstrate that direct injection of a PRV gI-gE double null mutant into the superior colliculus resulted in robust infection followed by retrograde transport to the eye and replication in retinal ganglion neuron cell bodies. These experiments provide additional proof that the retinal ganglion cells projecting to the superior colliculus are susceptible and permissive to gE and gI mutant viruses. Our studies confirm that gI and gE specifically facilitate anterograde spread of infection by affecting intracellular processes in the primary infected neuron such as anterograde transport in axons or egress from axon terminals.