Involvement of Rho-type GTPase in control of cell size in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Maintaining specific cell size, which is important for many organisms, is achieved by coordinating cell growth and cell division. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the existence of two cell-size checkpoints is proposed: at the first checkpoint, cell size is monitored before budding at the G1/S transition, and at the second checkpoint, actin depolymerization occurring in the small bud is monitored before the G2/M transition. Morphological analyses have revealed that the small GTPase Rho1p participates in cell-size control at both the G1/S and the G2/M boundaries. One group of rho1 mutants (rho1A) underwent premature entry into mitosis, leading to the birth of abnormally small cells. In another group of rho1 mutants (rho1B), the mother cells failed to reach an appropriate size before budding, and expression of the G1 cyclin Cln2p began at an earlier phase of the cell cycle. Analyses of mutants defective in Rho1p effector proteins indicate that Skn7p, Fks1p and Mpk1p are involved in cell-size control. Thus, Rho1p and its downstream regulatory pathways are involved in controlling cell size in S. cerevisiae.     

Conservation of mechanisms controlling entry into mitosis: budding yeast wee1 delays entry into mitosis and is required for cell size control

BACKGROUND: In fission yeast, the Wee1 kinase delays entry into mitosis until a critical cell size has been reached; however, a similar role for Wee1-related kinases has not been reported in other organisms. SWE1, the budding yeast homolog of wee1, is thought to function in a morphogenesis checkpoint that delays entry into mitosis in response to defects in bud morphogenesis. RESULTS: In contrast to previous studies, we found that budding yeast swe1 Delta cells undergo premature entry into mitosis, leading to birth of abnormally small cells. Additional experiments suggest that conditions that activate the morphogenesis checkpoint may actually be activating a G2/M cell size checkpoint. For example, actin depolymerization is thought to activate the morphogenesis checkpoint by inhibiting bud morphogenesis. However, actin depolymerization also inhibits bud growth, suggesting that it could activate a cell size checkpoint. Consistent with this possibility, we found that actin depolymerization fails to induce a G2/M delay once daughter buds pass a critical size. Other conditions that activate the morphogenesis checkpoint block bud formation, which could also activate a size checkpoint if cell size at G2/M is monitored in the daughter bud. Previous work reported that Swe1 is degraded during G2, which was proposed to account for failure of large-budded cells to arrest in response to actin depolymerization. However, we found that Swe1 is present throughout G2 and undergoes hyperphosphorylation as cells enter mitosis, as found in other organisms. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the mechanisms known to coordinate entry into mitosis in other organisms have been conserved in budding yeast.     

Cell-cycle checkpoints that ensure coordination between nuclear and cytoplasmic events in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Cytoskeletal organization is crucial for several aspects of cell-cycle progression but cytoskeletal elements are quite sensitive to environmental perturbations. Two novel checkpoint controls monitor the function of the actin and microtubule systems in budding yeast and operate to delay cell-cycle progression in response to cytoskeletal perturbations. In cells whose actin cytoskeleton has been perturbed, bud formation is frequently delayed and the morphogenesis checkpoint introduces a compensatory delay of nuclear division until a bud has been formed. In cells whose microtubule cytoskeleton has been perturbed, anaphase spindle elongation often occurs entirely within the mother cell, and the post-anaphase nuclear migration checkpoint introduces a compensatory delay of cytokinesis until one pole of the anaphase nucleus enters the bud. Recent studies indicate that regulators of entry into mitosis are localized to the daughter side of the mother-bud neck whereas regulators of exit from mitosis are localized to the spindle pole bodies. Thus, specific cell-cycle regulators are well-placed to monitor whether a cell has formed a bud and whether a daughter nucleus has been delivered accurately to the bud following mitosis.     

A role for the Pkc1p/Mpk1p kinase cascade in the morphogenesis checkpoint

In many cells the timing of entry into mitosis is controlled by the balance between the activity of inhibitory Wee1-related kinases (Swe1p in budding yeast) and the opposing effect of Cdc25-related phosphatases (Mih1p in budding yeast) that act on the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdc2 (Cdc28p in budding yeast). Wee1 and Cdc25 are key elements in the G2 arrest mediated by diverse checkpoint controls. In budding yeast, a 'morphogenesis checkpoint' that involves Swe1p and Mih1p delays mitotic activation of Cdc28p. Many environmental stresses (such as shifts in temperature or osmolarity) provoke transient depolarization of the actin cytoskeleton, during which bud construction is delayed while cells adapt to environmental conditions. During this delay, the morphogenesis checkpoint halts the cell cycle in G2 phase until actin can repolarize and complete bud construction, thus preventing the generation of binucleate cells. A similar G2 delay can be triggered by mutations or drugs that specifically impair actin organization, indicating that it is probably actin disorganization itself, rather than specific environmental stresses, that triggers the delay. The G2 delay involves stabilization of Swe1p in response to various actin perturbations, although this alone is insufficient to produce a long G2 delay.     

Cell cycle phases in the unequal mother/daughter cell cycles of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

During cell division in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae mother cells produce buds (daughter cells) which are smaller and have longer cell cycles. We performed experiments to compare the lengths of cell cycle phases in mothers and daughters. As anticipated from earlier indirect observations, the longer cell cycle time of daughter cells is accounted for by a longer G1 interval. The S-phase and the G2-phase are of the same duration in mother and daughter cells. An analysis of five isogenic strains shows that cell cycle phase lengths are independent of cell ploidy and mating type.     

Swe1p responds to cytoskeletal perturbation, not bud size, in S. cerevisiae

BACKGROUND: S. cerevisiae cells must grow to a critical size in G1 in order to pass start and enter the cell cycle. A recent study proposed that in addition to the mother size control in G1, the bud must grow to a critical bud size in G2 in order to enter mitosis. Insufficient bud size would cause G2 arrest enforced by the mitotic inhibitor Swe1p, explaining previous findings that some perturbations that block bud growth also trigger Swe1p-dependent cell-cycle arrest. RESULTS: We tested the critical-bud-size hypothesis. We found that halting bud growth by inactivation of the myosin Myo2p did not trigger Swe1p-dependent arrest in budded cells, even when the buds were very small. Moreover, Swe1p did not affect cell-cycle progression in unstressed cells, even when bud size was decreased by overriding G1 size control. Actin depolymerization did cause Swe1p-dependent arrest in small-budded but not large-budded cells, as previously reported. However, we found that the key determinant of cell-cycle arrest in those circumstances was not bud size, but rather the relative abundance of the Swe1p mitotic inhibitor and the mitosis-promoting cyclins. CONCLUSIONS: Swe1p does not respond to insufficient bud size. Instead, actin stress empowers Swe1p to promote arrest. The effectiveness of Swe1p in promoting that arrest declines as cells progress through the cell cycle.     

Asymmetrically localized Bud8p and Bud9p proteins control yeast cell polarity and development

Diploid strains of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae change the pattern of cell division from bipolar to unipolar when switching growth from the unicellular yeast form (YF) to filamentous, pseudohyphal (PH) cells in response to nitrogen starvation. The functions of two transmembrane proteins, Bud8p and Bud9p, in regulating YF and PH cell polarity were investigated. Bud8p is highly concentrated at the distal pole of both YF and PH cells, where it directs initiation of cell division. Asymmetric localization of Bud8p is independent of the Rsr1p/Bud1p GTPase. rsr1/bud1 mutations are epistatic to bud8 mutations, placing Rsr1p/Bud1p downstream of Bud8p. In YF cells, Bud9p is also localized at the distal pole, yet deletion of BUD9 favours distal bud initiation. In PH cells, nutritional starvation for nitrogen efficiently prevents distal localization of Bud9p. Because Bud8p and Bud9p proteins associate in vivo, we propose Bud8p as a landmark for bud initiation at the distal cell pole, where Bud9p acts as inhibitor. In response to nitrogen starvation, asymmetric localization of Bud9p is averted, favouring Bud8p-mediated cell division at the distal pole.     

Growth and the inducibility of mycelium formation in Candida albicans: a single-cell analysis using a perfusion chamber

In Candida albicans, cells actively growing in the budding form cannot be immediately induced to form a mycelium until they enter stationary phase. However, if exponential phase cells are starved for a minimum of 10 to 20 min, they are inducible. Using a video-monitored perfusion chamber, we found that starved cells were able to form mycelia regardless of their position in the budding cycle. When starved exponential cells were released into fresh nutrient medium at high temperature and pH, conditions conducive to mycelium formation, unbudded cells evaginated after an average lag period of 75 min and then grew exclusively in the mycelial form. Depending upon the volume, or maturity, of the bud, budded cells entered two different avenues of outgrowth leading to mycelium formation. If the daughter bud was small, growth resumed by apical elongation of the bud, leading to a 'shmoo' shape which tapered into an apical mycelium. If the daughter bud was large, the cell underwent a sequence of evaginations: first, the mother cell evaginated after an average period of 75 min; then the daughter bud evaginated 40 min later. Both evaginations then grew in the mycelial form. In this latter sequence, the evagination on the mother cell was positioned non-randomly, occurring in the majority of cells adjacent to the bud. All buds undergoing evagination contained a nucleus, but roughly 20% of buds undergoing apical elongation did not.     

A cell cycle checkpoint monitors cell morphogenesis in budding yeast

Checkpoint controls are regulatory pathways that inhibit cell cycle progression in cells that have not faithfully completed a prior step in the cell cycle. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, DNA replication and spindle assembly are monitored by checkpoint controls that prevent nuclear division in cells that have failed to complete these processes. During the normal cell cycle, bud formation is temporally coincident with DNA replication and spindle assembly, and the nucleus divides along the mother-bud axis in mitosis. In this report, we show that inhibition of bud formation also causes a dramatic delay in nuclear division. This allows cells to recover from a transient disruption of cell polarity without becoming binucleate. The delay occurs after DNA replication and spindle assembly, and results from delayed activation of the master cell cycle regulatory kinase, Cdc28. Cdc28 activation is inhibited by phosphorylation of Cdc28 on tyrosine 19, and by delayed accumulation of the B-type cyclins Clb1 and Clb2. These results suggest the existence of a novel checkpoint that monitors cell morphogenesis in budding yeast.     

Control of Swe1p degradation by the morphogenesis checkpoint.

In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a cell cycle checkpoint coordinates mitosis with bud formation. Perturbations that transiently depolarize the actin cytoskeleton cause delays in bud formation, and a 'morphogenesis checkpoint' detects the actin perturbation and imposes a G2 delay through inhibition of the cyclin-dependent kinase, Cdc28p. The tyrosine kinase Swe1p, homologous to wee1 in fission yeast, is required for the checkpoint-mediated G2 delay. In this report, we show that Swe1p stability is regulated both during the normal cell cycle and in response to the checkpoint. Swe1p is stable during G1 and accumulates to a peak at the end of S phase or in early G2, when it becomes unstable and is degraded rapidly. Destabilization of Swe1p in G2 and M phase depends on the activity of Cdc28p in complexes with B-type cyclins. Several different perturbations of actin organization all prevent Swe1p degradation, leading to the persistence or further accumulation of Swe1p, and cell cycle delay in G2.     

Dual cell cycle checkpoints sensitive to chromosome replication and DNA damage in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

In eucaryotic cells chromosomes must be fully replicated and repaired before mitosis begins. Genetic studies indicate that this dependence of mitosis on completion of DNA replication and DNA repair derives from a negative control called a checkpoint which somehow checks for replication and DNA damage and blocks cell entry into mitosis. Here we summarize our current understanding of the genetic components of the cell cycle checkpoint in budding yeast. Mutants were identified and their phase and signal specificity tested primarily through interactions of the arrest-defective mutants with cell division cycle mutants. The results indicate that dual checkpoint controls exist in budding yeast, one control sensitive to inhibition of DNA replication (S-phase checkpoint), and a distinct but overlapping control sensitive to DNA repair (G2 checkpoint). Six genes are required for arrest in G2 phase after DNA damage (RAD9, RAD17, RAD24, MEC1, MEC2, and MEC3), and two of these are also essential for arrest in S phase when DNA replication is blocked (MEC1 and MEC2).     

Endogenous Bud Formation in Histriculus vorax, a New Asexual Reproductive Process In the Hypotrichida

SYNOPSIS. Histriculus vorax (Stokes) Corliss, a hypotrichous ciliate, has been separated from activated sludge and cultured monoxenically in the laboratory. The asexual life cycle has been observed and the stages of development photographed. There are large variations in shape and size of cells within clonal cultures. Both large (190–250 μ long) and small (70–140 μ long) cells are capable of normal asexual binary fission but only the large cells are able to grow endogenous buds, which, when mature, are extruded through the body wall of the mother cell. Newly deposited buds can either develop directly into an embryonic form, or, if unfavorable conditions prevail, first encyst. Similar embryonic stages bearing caudal and frontal cirri are produced both by direct development and by excystment of the encysted bud. Embryos develop rapidly into trophic forms which finally grow into small adults capable of asexual binary fission. During binary fission the nuclei behave as described previously for other members of the Oxytrichidae. A reorganization band forms at the outer end of each macronucleus, and these bands move along the macronuclei towards each other, finally disappearing at the inner ends. A fusion nucleus is then formed which splits into 4 pieces, 2 of which pass to the proter and 2 to the opisthe. During bud formation the reorganisation bands form and move as in binary fission. No fusion nucleus is formed, but the macronuclei divide immediately after reorganization, and the anterior macronucleus of each pair so produced migrates to the budding region. The infraciliature of H. vorax resembles that of Opisthotricha monspessulana. 'Erratic' kinetosomes, which are present in the adult, divide during binary fission and so produce the infraciliature of the proter and opisthe. During bud formation the budding region receives a number of these 'erratic' kinetosomes from the mother cell, and these divide to form the infraciliature of the bud.     

Volume growth of daughter and parent cells during the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae a/alpha as determined by image cytometry.

The pattern of volume growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae a/alpha was determined by image cytometry for daughter cells and consecutive cycles of parent cells. An image analysis program was specially developed to measure separately the volume of bud and mother cell parts and to quantify the number of bud scars on each parent cell. All volumetric data and cell attributes (budding state, number of scars) were stored in such a way that separate volume distributions of cells or cell parts with any combination of properties--for instance, buds present on mothers with two scars or cells without scars (i.e., daughter cells) and without buds--could be obtained. By a new method called intersection analysis, the average volumes of daughter and parent cells at birth and at division could be determined for a steady-state population. These volumes compared well with those directly measured from cells synchronized by centrifugal elutriation. During synchronous growth of daughter cells, the pattern of volume increase appeared to be largely exponential. However, after bud emergence, larger volumes than those predicted by a continuous exponential increase were obtained, which confirms the reported decrease in buoyant density. The cycle times calculated from the steady-state population by applying the age distribution equation deviated from those directly obtained from the synchronized culture, probably because of inadequate scoring of bud scars. Therefore, for the construction of a volume-time diagram, we used volume measurements obtained from the steady-state population and cycle times obtained from the synchronized population. The diagram shows that after bud emergence, mother cell parts continue to grow at a smaller rate, increasing about 10% in volume during the budding period. Second-generation daughter cells, ie., cells born from parents left with two scars, were significantly smaller than first-generation daughter cells. Second- and third-generation parent cells showed a decreased volume growth rate and a shorter budding period than that of daughter cells.     

Bud emergence is gradually delayed from S to G2 with progression of growth phase in Cryptococcus neoformans

The G2 index of the yeast Cryptococcus neoformans determined by laser scanning cytometer was 2-3 times higher than the budding index during transition to the stationary phase of the culture, indicating that buds emerged in the G2 phase of the cell cycle. To clarify whether buds also emerge in G2 during exponential growth of the culture, DNA content for each cell was measured with a fluorescence microscope equipped with a photomultiplier. The DNA content of cells having tiny buds varied rather widely, depending on growth phases and strains used. Typically, buds of C. neoformans emerged soon after initiation of DNA synthesis in the early exponential phase. However, bud emergence was delayed to G2 during transition to the stationary phase, and in the early stationary phase budding scarcely occurred, although roughly half of the cells completed DNA synthesis. Thus, the timing of budding in C. neoformans was actually shifted to later cell cycle points with progression of the growth phase of the culture.     

Yeast G1 cyclins CLN1 and CLN2 and a GAP-like protein have a role in bud formation.

Cyclin-dependent protein kinases have a central role in cell cycle regulation. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Cdc28 kinase and the G1 cyclins Cln1, 2 and 3 are required for DNA replication, duplication of the spindle pole body and bud emergence. These three independent processes occur simultaneously in late G1 when the cells reach a critical size, an event known as Start. At least one of the three Clns is necessary for Start. Cln3 is believed to activate Cln1 and Cln2, which can then stimulate their own accumulation by means of a positive feedback loop. They (or Cln3) also activate another pair of cyclins, Clb5 and 6, involved in initiating S phase. Little is known about the role of Clns in spindle pole body duplication and budding. We report here the isolation of a gene (CLA2/BUD2/ERC25) that codes for a homologue of mammalian Ras-associated GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) and is necessary for budding only in cln1 cln2 cells. This suggests that Cln1 and Cln2 may have a direct role in bud formation.     

Spindle checkpoint proteins and chromosome-microtubule attachment in budding yeast

Accurate chromosome segregation depends on precise regulation of mitosis by the spindle checkpoint. This checkpoint monitors the status of kinetochore-microtubule attachment and delays the metaphase to anaphase transition until all kinetochores have formed stable bipolar connections to the mitotic spindle. Components of the spindle checkpoint include the mitotic arrest defective (MAD) genes MAD1-3, and the budding uninhibited by benzimidazole (BUB) genes BUB1 and BUB3. In animal cells, all known spindle checkpoint proteins are recruited to kinetochores during normal mitoses. In contrast, we show that whereas Saccharomyces cerevisiae Bub1p and Bub3p are bound to kinetochores early in mitosis as part of the normal cell cycle, Mad1p and Mad2p are kinetochore bound only in the presence of spindle damage or kinetochore lesions that interfere with chromosome-microtubule attachment. Moreover, although Mad1p and Mad2p perform essential mitotic functions during every division cycle in mammalian cells, they are required in budding yeast only when mitosis goes awry. We propose that differences in the behavior of spindle checkpoint proteins in animal cells and budding yeast result primarily from evolutionary divergence in spindle assembly pathways.