1H, 13C and 15N resonance assignments of the C-terminal DNA-binding domain of RstA protein from Klebsiella pneumoniae

Bacterial cells often use two-component signal transduction systems to regulate genes in response to environmental stimuli. The RstA/RstB system is a two-component regulatory system consisting of the membrane sensor, RstB, and its cognate response regulator RstA. The RstA of Klebsiella pneumoniae consists of a N-terminal receiver domain (NRD, residues 1-119) and a C-terminal DNA-binding domain (DBD, residues 130-236). Phosphorylation of the response regulator induces a conformational change in the regulatory domain of RstA, which results in activation of the effector domain to regulate the downstream genes, including the ferrous iron transport system (Feo), at low-pH condition. Here we report the ¹H, ¹³C and ¹⁵N resonance assignments and secondary structure identification of the DBD of RstA from K. pneumoniae as a first step for unraveling the structural and functional relationship of the RstA/RstB two component system.     

Cooperative binding of the yeast Spt10p activator to the histone upstream activating sequences is mediated through an N-terminal dimerization domain

The yeast Spt10p activator is a putative histone acetyltransferase (HAT) possessing a sequence-specific DNA-binding domain (DBD) which binds to the upstream activation sequences (UAS elements) in the histone gene promoters. Spt10p binds to a pair of histone UAS elements with extreme positive cooperativity. The molecular basis of this cooperativity was addressed. Spt10p (640 residues) is an elongated dimer, but the isolated DBD (residues 283–396) is a monomer and binds non-cooperatively to DNA. A Spt10p fragment comprising the N-terminal domain (NTD), HAT domain and DBD (residues 1–396) binds cooperatively and is a dimer, whereas an overlapping Spt10p fragment comprising the DBD and C-terminal domains (residues 283–640) binds non-cooperatively and is a monomer. These observations imply that cooperative binding requires dimerization. The isolated NTD (residues 1–98) is a dimer and is responsible for dimerization. We propose that cooperativity involves a conformational change in the Spt10p dimer which facilitates the simultaneous recognition of two UAS elements. In vivo, deletion of the NTD results in poor growth, but does not prevent the binding at the HTA1 promoter, suggesting that dimerization is biologically important. Residues 1–396 are sufficient for normal growth, indicating that the critical functions of Spt10p reside in the N-terminal domains.     

A new structural insight into XPA–DNA interactions

XPA (xeroderma pigmentosum group A) protein is an essential factor for NER (nucleotide excision repair) which is believed to be involved in DNA damage recognition/verification, NER factor recruiting and stabilization of repair intermediates. Past studies on the structure of XPA have focused primarily on XPA interaction with damaged DNA. However, how XPA interacts with other DNA structures remains unknown though recent evidence suggest that these structures could be important for its roles in both NER and non-NER activities. Previously, we reported that XPA recognizes undamaged DNA ds/ssDNA (double-strand/single-strandDNA) junctions with a binding affinity much higher than its ability to bind bulky DNA damage. To understand how this interaction occurs biochemically we implemented a structural determination of the interaction using a MS-based protein footprinting method and limited proteolysis. By monitoring surface accessibility of XPA lysines to NHS-biotin modification in the free protein and the DNA junction-bound complex we show that XPA physically interacts with the DNA junctions via two lysines, K168 and K179, located in the previously known XPA(98–219) DBD (DNA-binding domain). Importantly, we also uncovered new lysine residues, outside of the known DBD, involved in the binding. We found that residues K221, K222, K224 and K236 in the C-terminal domain are involved in DNA binding. Limited proteolysis analysis of XPA–DNA interactions further confirmed this observation. Structural modelling with these data suggests a clamp-like DBD for the XPA binding to ds/ssDNA junctions. Our results provide a novel structure-function view of XPA–DNA junction interactions.     

Cooperative binding of DNA and CBFbeta to the Runt domain of the CBFalpha studied via MD simulations

The Runt domain (RD) is the DNA-binding region of the Runx genes. A related protein, known as core binding factor β (CBFβ) also binds to the RD to enhance RD–DNA interaction by 6- to 10-fold. Here, we report results from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of RD alone, as a dimer in complexes with DNA and CBFβ and in a ternary complex with DNA and CBFβ. Consistent with the experimental findings, in the presence of CBFβ the estimated free energy of binding of RD to the DNA is more favorable, which is shown to be due to more favorable intermolecular interactions and desolvation contributions. Also contributing to the enhanced binding are favorable intramolecular interactions between the ‘wing’ residues (RD residues 139–145) and the ‘wing1’ residues (RD residues 104–116). The simulation studies also indicate that the RD–CBFβ binding is more favorable in the presence of DNA due to a more favorable RD–CBFβ interaction energy. In addition, it is predicted that long-range interactions involving ionic residues contribute to binding cooperativity. Results from the MD calculations are used to interpret a variety of experimental mutagenesis data. A novel role for RD Glu116 to the RD–CBFβ interaction is predicted.     

Characterization of DNA Binding Property of the HIV-1 Host Factor and Tumor Suppressor Protein Integrase Interactor 1 (INI1/hSNF5)

Integrase Interactor 1 (INI1/hSNF5) is a component of the hSWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex. The INI1 gene is either deleted or mutated in rhabdoid cancers like ATRT (Atypical terratoid and rhabdoid tumor). INI1 is also a host factor for HIV-1 replication. INI1 binds DNA non-specifically. However, the mechanism of DNA binding and its biological role are unknown. From agarose gel retardation assay (AGRA), Ni-NTA pull-down and atomic force microscopy (AFM) studies we show that amino acids 105–183 of INI1 comprise the minimal DNA binding domain (DBD). The INI1 DBD is absent in plants and in yeast SNF5. It is present in Caenorhabditis elegans SNF5, Drosophila melanogaster homologue SNR1 and is a highly conserved domain in vertebrates. The DNA binding property of this domain in SNR1, that is only 58% identical to INI1/hSNF5, is conserved. Analytical ultracentrifugation studies of INI1 DBD and INI1 DBD:DNA complexes at different concentrations show that the DBD exists as a monomer at low protein concentration and two molecules of monomer binds one molecule of DNA. At high protein concentration, it exists as a dimer and binds two DNA molecules. Furthermore, isothermal calorimetry (ITC) experiments demonstrate that the DBD monomer binds DNA with a stoichiometry (N) of ∼0.5 and K_d  = 0.94 µM whereas the DBD dimer binds two DNA molecules sequentially with K’_d1 = 222 µM and K’_d2 = 1.16 µM. Monomeric DBD binding to DNA is enthalpy driven (ΔH = –29.9 KJ/mole). Dimeric DBD binding to DNA is sequential with the first binding event driven by positive entropy (ΔH’₁ = 115.7 KJ/mole, TΔS’₁ = 136.8 KJ/mole) and the second binding event driven by negative enthalpy (ΔH’₂ = –106.3 KJ/mole, TΔS’₂ = –75.7 KJ/mole). Our model for INI1 DBD binding to DNA provides new insights into the mechanism of DNA binding by INI1.     

Mechanisms for allosteric activation of protease DegS by ligand binding and oligomerization as revealed from molecular dynamics simulations

A local perturbation of a protein may lead to functional changes at some distal site, a phenomenon denoted as allostery. Here, we study the allosteric control of a protease using molecular dynamics simulations. The system considered is the bacterial protein DegS which includes a protease domain activated on ligand binding to an adjacent PDZ domain. Starting from crystallographic structures of DegS homo‐trimers, we perform simulations of the ligand‐free and ‐bound state of DegS at equilibrium. Considering a single protomer only, the trimeric state was mimicked by applying restraints on the residues in contact with other protomers in the DegS trimer. In addition, the bound state was also simulated without any restraints to mimic the monomer. Our results suggest that not only ligand release but also disassembly of a DegS trimer inhibits proteolytic activity. Considering various observables for structural changes, we infer allosteric pathways from the interface with other protomers to the active site. Moreover, we study how ligand release leads to (i) catalytically relevant changes involving residues 199–201 and (ii) a transition from a stretched to a bent conformation for residues 217–219 (which prohibits proper substrate binding). Finally, based on ligand‐induced C_α shifts we identify residues in contact with other protomers in the DegS trimer that likely transduce the perturbation from ligand release from a given protomer to adjacent protomers. These residues likely play a key role in the experimentally known effect of ligand release from a protomer on the proteolytic activity of the other protomers. Proteins 2016; 84:1690–1705. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Monomeric complex of human orphan estrogen related receptor-2 with DNA: a pseudo-dimer interface mediates extended half-site recognition

While most nuclear receptors bind DNA as homo or heterodimers, the human estrogen related receptors (hERRs) are members of a subfamily of orphan receptors that bind DNA as monomers. We have determined the solution structure of the DNA binding domain (DBD) of hERR2 bound to its cognate DNA. The structure and base interactions of the core DBD are similar to those of other nuclear receptors. However, high-affinity, sequence-specific DNA binding as a monomer necessitates formation of additional base contacts outside the core DBD. This is accomplished using a modified guanosine-binding "AT-hook" within the C-terminal extension (CTE) flanking the DBD, which makes base-specific minor groove interactions. The structure of the CTE is stabilized both by interactions with the DNA and by packing against a region of the core DBD normally reserved for dimerization. This pseudo-dimer interface provides a basis for the expansion of DNA recognition and suggests a mechanism through which dimerization may have evolved from an ancestral monomeric receptor.     

Dimerization Domain of Retinal Membrane Guanylyl Cyclase 1 (RetGC1) Is an Essential Part of Guanylyl Cyclase-activating Protein (GCAP) Binding Interface

The photoreceptor-specific proteins guanylyl cyclase-activating proteins (GCAPs) bind and regulate retinal membrane guanylyl cyclase 1 (RetGC1) but not natriuretic peptide receptor A (NPRA). Study of RetGC1 regulation in vitro and its association with fluorescently tagged GCAP in transfected cells showed that R822P substitution in the cyclase dimerization domain causing congenital early onset blindness disrupted RetGC1 ability to bind GCAP but did not eliminate its affinity for another photoreceptor-specific protein, retinal degeneration 3 (RD3). Likewise, the presence of the NPRA dimerization domain in RetGC1/NPRA chimera specifically disabled binding of GCAPs but not of RD3. In subsequent mapping using hybrid dimerization domains in RetGC1/NPRA chimera, multiple RetGC1-specific residues contributed to GCAP binding by the cyclase, but the region around Met⁸²³ was the most crucial. Either positively or negatively charged residues in that position completely blocked GCAP1 and GCAP2 but not RD3 binding similarly to the disease-causing mutation in the neighboring Arg⁸²². The specificity of GCAP binding imparted by RetGC1 dimerization domain was not directly related to promoting dimerization of the cyclase. The probability of coiled coil dimer formation computed for RetGC1/NPRA chimeras, even those incapable of binding GCAP, remained high, and functional complementation tests showed that the RetGC1 active site, which requires dimerization of the cyclase, was formed even when Met⁸²³ or Arg⁸²² was mutated. These results directly demonstrate that the interface for GCAP binding on RetGC1 requires not only the kinase homology region but also directly involves the dimerization domain and especially its portion containing Arg⁸²² and Met⁸²³.     

Dimerization of Toll-like Receptor 3 (TLR3) Is Required for Ligand Binding

TLR3 (Toll-like receptor 3) recognizes dsRNA, a potent indicator of viral infection. The extracellular domain of TLR3 dimerizes when it binds dsRNA, and the crystal structure of the dimeric complex reveals three sites of interaction on each extracellular domain, two that bind dsRNA and one that is responsible for dimer formation. The goal of this study was to determine which amino acid residues are essential for forming a stable receptor·ligand complex and whether dimerization of TLR3 is required for dsRNA binding. Using a novel ELISA to analyze dsRNA binding by mutant TLR3 constructs, we identified the essential interacting residues and determined that the simultaneous interaction of all three sites is required for ligand binding. In addition, we show that TLR3 is unable to bind dsRNA when dimerization is prevented by mutating residues in the dimerization site or by immobilizing TLR3 at low density. We conclude that dimerization of TLR3 is essential for ligand binding and that the three TLR3 contact sites individually interact weakly with their binding partners but together form a high affinity receptor·ligand complex.     

Domain specific interaction in the XRCC1-DNA polymerase beta complex

XRCC1 (X-ray cross-complementing group 1) is a DNA repair protein that forms complexes with DNA polymerase β (β-Pol), DNA ligase III and poly-ADP-ribose polymerase in the repair of DNA single strand breaks. The domains in XRCC1 have been determined, and characterization of the domain–domain interaction in the XRCC1-β-Pol complex has provided information on the specificity and mechanism of binding. The domain structure of XRCC1, determined using limited proteolysis, was found to include an N-terminal domain (NTD), a central BRCT-I (breast cancer susceptibility protein-1) domain and a C-terminal BRCT-II domain. The BRCT-I–linker–BRCT-II C-terminal fragment and the linker–BRCT-II C-terminal fragment were relatively stable to proteolysis suggestive of a non-random conformation of the linker. A predicted inner domain was found not to be stable to proteolysis. Using cross-linking experiments, XRCC1 was found to bind intact β-Pol and the β-Pol 31 kDa domain. The XRCC1-NTD_1–183 (residues 1–183) was found to bind β-Pol, the β-Pol 31 kDa domain and the β-Pol C-terminal palm-thumb (residues 140–335), and the interaction was further localized to XRCC1-NTD_1–157 (residues 1–157). The XRCC1-NTD_1–183-β-Pol 31 kDa domain complex was stable at high salt (1 M NaCl) indicative of a hydrophobic contribution. Using a yeast two-hybrid screen, polypeptides expressed from two XRCC1 constructs, which included residues 36–355 and residues 1–159, were found to interact with β-Pol, the β-Pol 31 kDa domain, and the β-Pol C-terminal thumb-only domain polypeptides expressed from the respective β-Pol constructs. Neither the XRCC1-NTD_1–159, nor the XRCC1_36–355 polypeptide was found to interact with a β-Pol thumbless polypeptide. A third XRCC1 polypeptide (residues 75–212) showed no interaction with β-Pol. In quantitative gel filtration and analytical ultracentrifugation experiments, the XRCC1-NTD_1–183 was found to bind β-Pol and its 31 kDa domain in a 1:1 complex with high affinity (K_d of 0.4–2.4 µM). The combined results indicate a thumb-domain specific 1:1 interaction between the XRCC1-NTD_1–159 and β-Pol that is of an affinity comparable to other binding interactions involving β-Pol.     

Determinants of homodimerization specificity in histidine kinases

Two-component signal transduction pathways consisting of a histidine kinase and a response regulator are used by prokaryotes to respond to diverse environmental and intracellular stimuli. Most species encode numerous paralogous histidine kinases that exhibit significant structural similarity. Yet in almost all known examples, histidine kinases are thought to function as homodimers. We investigated the molecular basis of dimerization specificity, focusing on the model histidine kinase EnvZ and RstB, its closest paralog in Escherichia coli. Direct binding studies showed that the cytoplasmic domains of these proteins each form specific homodimers in vitro. Using a series of chimeric proteins, we identified specificity determinants at the base of the four-helix bundle in the dimerization and histidine phosphotransfer domain. Guided by molecular coevolution predictions and EnvZ structural information, we identified sets of residues in this region that are sufficient to establish homospecificity. Mutating these residues in EnvZ to the corresponding residues in RstB produced a functional kinase that preferentially homodimerized over interacting with EnvZ. EnvZ and RstB likely diverged following gene duplication to yield two homodimers that cannot heterodimerize, and the mutants we identified represent possible evolutionary intermediates in this process.     

The MDMX Acidic Domain Uses Allovalency to Bind Both p53 and MDMX

Autoinhibition of p53 binding to MDMX requires two short-linear motifs (SLiMs) containing adjacent tryptophan (WW) and tryptophan-phenylalanine (WF) residues. NMR spectroscopy was used to show the WW and WF motifs directly compete for the p53 binding site on MDMX and circular dichroism spectroscopy was used to show the WW motif becomes helical when it is bound to the p53 binding domain (p53BD) of MDMX. Binding studies using isothermal titration calorimetry showed the WW motif is a stronger inhibitor of p53 binding than the WF motif when they are both tethered to p53BD by the natural disordered linker. We also investigated how the WW and WF motifs interact with the DNA binding domain (DBD) of p53. Both motifs bind independently to similar sites on DBD that overlap the DNA binding site. Taken together our work defines a model for complex formation between MDMX and p53 where a pair of disordered SLiMs bind overlapping sites on both proteins.     

Structure-Based Mutational Analysis of the C-Terminal DNA-Binding Domain of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Integrase: Critical Residues for Protein Oligomerization and DNA Binding

The C-terminal domain of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) integrase (IN) is a dimer that binds to DNA in a nonspecific manner. The structure of the minimal region required for DNA binding (IN_220–270) has been solved by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The overall fold of the C-terminal domain of HIV-1 IN is similar to those of Src homology region 3 domains. Based on the structure of IN_220–270, we studied the role of 15 amino acid residues potentially involved in DNA binding and oligomerization by mutational analysis. We found that two amino acid residues, arginine 262 and leucine 234, contribute to DNA binding in the context of IN_220–270, as indicated by protein-DNA UV cross-link analysis. We also analyzed mutant proteins representing portions of the full-length IN protein. Amino acid substitution of residues located in the hydrophobic dimer interface, such as L241A and L242A, results in the loss of oligomerization of IN; consequently, the levels of 3′ processing, DNA strand transfer, and intramolecular disintegration are strongly reduced. These results suggest that dimerization of the C-terminal domain of IN is important for correct multimerization of IN.     

Proposed mechanism for the stabilization of nuclear receptor DNA binding via protein dimerization.

Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 (HNF-4) defines a new subgroup of nuclear receptors that exist in solution and bind DNA exclusively as homodimers. We recently showed that the putative ligand binding domain (LBD) of HNF-4 is responsible for dimerization in solution and prevents heterodimerization with other receptors. In this report, the role of the LBD in DNA binding by HNF-4 is further investigated by using electrophoretic mobility shift analysis. A comparison of constructs containing either the DNA binding domain (DBD) alone or the DBD plus the LBD of HNF-4 showed that dimerization via the DBD was sufficient to provide nearly the full DNA binding affinity of the full-length HNF-4. In contrast, dimerization via the DBD was not sufficient to produce a stable protein-DNA complex, whereas dimerization via the LBD increased the half-life of the complex by at least 100-fold. Circular permutation analysis showed that full-length HNF-4 bent DNA by approximately 80 degrees while the DBD bent DNA by only 24 degrees. Nonetheless, analysis of other constructs indicated that the increase in stability afforded by the LBD could be explained only partially by an increased ability to bend DNA. Coimmunoprecipitation studies, on the other hand, showed that dimerization via the LBD produced a protein-protein complex that was much more stable than the corresponding protein-DNA complex. These results led us to propose a model in which dimerization via the LBD stabilizes the receptor on DNA by converting an energetically favorable two-step dissociation event into an energetically unfavorable single-step event. Implications of this one-step model for other nuclear receptors are discussed.     

Crystal structure of a membrane stomatin-specific protease in complex with a substrate peptide

Membrane-bound proteases are involved in various regulatory functions. A previous report indicated that the N-terminal region of PH1510p (1510-N) from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus horikoshii is a serine protease with a catalytic Ser-Lys dyad (Ser97 and Lys138) and specifically cleaves the C-terminal hydrophobic region of the p-stomatin PH1511p. In humans, an absence of stomatin is associated with a form of hemolytic anemia known as hereditary stomatocytosis. Here, the crystal structure of 1510-N K138A in complex with a peptide substrate was determined at 2.25 ? resolution. In the structure, a 1510-N dimer binds to one peptide. The six central residues (VIVLML) of the peptide are hydrophobic and in a pseudopalindromic structure and therefore favorably fit into the hydrophobic active tunnel of the 1510-N dimer, although 1510-N degrades the substrate at only one point. A comparison with unliganded 1510-N K138A revealed that the binding of the substrate causes a large rotational and translational displacement between protomers and produces a tunnel suitable for binding the peptide. When the peptide binds, the flexible L2 loop of one protomer forms β-strands, whereas that of the other protomer remains in a loop form, indicating that one protomer binds to the peptide more tightly than the other protomer. The Ala138 residues of the two protomers are located very close together (the distance between the two Cβ atoms is 3.6 ?). Thus, in wild-type 1510-N, the close positioning of the catalytic Ser97 and Lys138 residues may be induced by electrostatic repulsion of the two Lys138 side chains of the protomers.     

Characterization of the minimal DNA binding domain of the human papillomavirus e1 helicase: fluorescence anisotropy studies and characterization of a dimerization-defective mutant protein

The E1 helicase of papillomaviruses is required for replication of the viral double-stranded DNA genome, in conjunction with cellular factors. DNA replication is initiated at the viral origin by the assembly of E1 monomers into oligomeric complexes that have unwinding activity. In vivo, this process is catalyzed by the viral E2 protein, which recruits E1 specifically at the origin. For bovine papillomavirus (BPV) E1 a minimal DNA-binding domain (DBD) has been identified N-terminal to the enzymatic domain. In this study, we characterized the DBD of human papillomavirus 11 (HPV11), HPV18, and BPV E1 using a quantitative DNA binding assay based on fluorescence anisotropy. We found that the HPV11 DBD binds DNA with an affinity and sequence requirement comparable to those of the analogous domain of BPV but that the HPV18 DBD has a higher affinity for nonspecific DNA. By comparing the DNA-binding properties of a dimerization-defective protein to those of the wild type, we provide evidence that dimerization of the HPV11 DBD occurs only on two appropriately positioned E1 binding-sites and contributes approximately a 10-fold increase in binding affinity. In contrast, the HPV11 E1 helicase purified as preformed hexamers binds DNA with little sequence specificity, similarly to a dimerization-defective DBD. Finally, we show that the amino acid substitution that prevents dimerization reduces the ability of a longer E1 protein to bind to the origin in vitro and to support transient HPV DNA replication in vivo, but has little effect on its ATPase activity or ability to oligomerize into hexamers. These results are discussed in light of a model of the assembly of replication-competent double hexameric E1 complexes at the origin.     

Delineation of the high-affinity single-stranded telomeric DNA-binding domain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cdc13

Cdc13 is an essential protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae that caps telomeres by protecting the C-rich telomeric DNA strand from degradation and facilitates telomeric DNA replication by telomerase. In vitro, Cdc13 binds TG-rich single-stranded telomeric DNA with high affinity and specificity. A previously identified domain of Cdc13 encompassing amino acids 451–694 (the 451–694 DBD) retains the single-stranded DNA-binding properties of the full-length protein; however, this domain contains a large unfolded region identified in heteronuclear NMR experiments. Trypsin digestion and MALDI mass spectrometry were used to identify the minimal DNA-binding domain (the 497–694 DBD) necessary and sufficient for full DNA-binding activity. This domain was completely folded, and the N-terminal unfolded region removed was shown to be dispensable for function. Using affinity photocrosslinking to site-specifically modified telomeric single-stranded DNA, the 497–694 DBD was shown to contact the entire 11mer required for high-affinity binding. Intriguingly, both domains bound single-stranded telomeric DNA with much greater affinity than the full-length protein. The full-length protein exhibited the same rate of dissociation as both domains, however, indicating that the full-length protein contains a region that inhibits association with single-stranded telomeric DNA.