The centrosome and bipolar spindle assembly: Does one have anything to do with the other?

In vertebrate somatic cells, the centrosome functions as the major microtubule-organizing center (MTOC), which splits and separates to form the poles of the mitotic spindle. However, the role of the centriole-containing centrosome in the formation of bipolar mitotic spindles continues to be controversial. Cells normally containing centrosomes are still able to build bipolar spindles after their centrioles have been removed or ablated. In naturally occurring cellular systems that lack centrioles, such as plant cells and many oocytes, bipolar spindles form in the complete absence of canonical centrosomes. These observations have led to the notion that centrosomes play no role during mitosis. However, recent work has re-examined spindle assembly in the absence of centrosomes, both in cells that naturally lack them and those that have had them experimentally removed. The results of these studies suggest that an appreciation of microtubule network organization, both before and after nuclear envelope breakdown (NEB), is the key to understanding the mechanisms that regulate spindle assembly and the generation of bipolarity.Key words: centrosome, centriole, mitosis, spindle, cell cycle, meiosis, plant cell, microsurgery     

The centrosomal protein C-Nap1 is required for cell cycle-regulated centrosome cohesion

Duplicating centrosomes are paired during interphase, but are separated at the onset of mitosis. Although the mechanisms controlling centrosome cohesion and separation are important for centrosome function throughout the cell cycle, they remain poorly understood. Recently, we have proposed that C-Nap1, a novel centrosomal protein, is part of a structure linking parental centrioles in a cell cycle-regulated manner. To test this model, we have performed a detailed structure-function analysis on C-Nap1. We demonstrate that antibody-mediated interference with C-Nap1 function causes centrosome splitting, regardless of the cell cycle phase. Splitting occurs between parental centrioles and is not dependent on the presence of an intact microtubule or microfilament network. Centrosome splitting can also be induced by overexpression of truncated C-Nap1 mutants, but not full-length protein. Antibodies raised against different domains of C-Nap1 prove that this protein dissociates from spindle poles during mitosis, but reaccumulates at centrosomes at the end of cell division. Use of the same antibodies in immunoelectron microscopy shows that C-Nap1 is confined to the proximal end domains of centrioles, indicating that a putative linker structure must contain additional proteins. We conclude that C-Nap1 is a key component of a dynamic, cell cycle-regulated structure that mediates centriole-centriole cohesion.     

Nonequivalence of maternal centrosomes/centrioles in starfish oocytes: selective casting-off of reproductive centrioles into polar bodies

It is believed that in most animals only the paternal centrosome provides the division poles for mitosis in zygotes. This paternal inheritance of the centrosomes depends on the selective loss of the maternal centrosome. In order to understand the mechanism of centrosome inheritance, the behavior of all maternal centrosomes/centrioles was investigated throughout the meiotic and mitotic cycles by using starfish eggs that had polar body (PB) formation suppressed. In starfish oocytes, the centrioles do not duplicate during meiosis II. Hence, each centrosome of the meiosis II spindle has only one centriole, whereas in meiosis I, each has a pair of centrioles. When two pairs of meiosis I centrioles were retained in the cytoplasm of oocytes by complete suppression of PB extrusion, they separated into four single centrioles in meiosis II. However, after completion of the meiotic process, only two of the four single centrioles were found in addition to the pronucleus. When the two single centrioles of a meiosis II spindle were retained in the oocyte cytoplasm by suppressing the extrusion of the second PB, only one centriole was found with the pronucleus after the completion of the meiotic process. When these PB-suppressed eggs were artificially activated to drive the mitotic cycles, all the surviving single centrioles duplicated repeatedly to form pairs of centrioles, which could organize mitotic spindles. These results indicate that the maternal centrioles are not equivalent in their intrinsic stability and reproductive capacity. The centrosomes with the reproductive centrioles are selectively cast off into the PBs, resulting in the mature egg inheriting a nonreproductive centriole, which would degrade shortly after the completion of meiosis.     

The Centrosomal Linker and Microtubules Provide Dual Levels of Spatial Coordination of Centrosomes

The centrosome is the principal microtubule organizing center in most animal cells. It consists of a pair of centrioles surrounded by pericentriolar material. The centrosome, like DNA, duplicates exactly once per cell cycle. During interphase duplicated centrosomes remain closely linked by a proteinaceous linker. This centrosomal linker is composed of rootletin filaments that are anchored to the centrioles via the protein C-Nap1. At the onset of mitosis the linker is dissolved by Nek2A kinase to support the formation of the bipolar mitotic spindle. The importance of the centrosomal linker for cell function during interphase awaits characterization. Here we assessed the phenotype of human RPE1 C-Nap1 knockout (KO) cells. The absence of the linker led to a modest increase in the average centrosome separation from 1 to 2.5 μm. This small impact on the degree of separation is indicative of a second level of spatial organization of centrosomes. Microtubule depolymerisation or stabilization in C-Nap1 KO cells dramatically increased the inter-centrosomal separation (> 8 μm). Thus, microtubules position centrosomes relatively close to one another in the absence of linker function. C-Nap1 KO cells had a Golgi organization defect with a two-fold expansion of the area occupied by the Golgi. When the centrosomes of C-Nap1 KO cells showed considerable separation, two spatially distinct Golgi stacks could be observed. Furthermore, migration of C-Nap1 KO cells was slower than their wild type RPE1 counterparts. These data show that the spatial organization of centrosomes is modulated by a combination of centrosomal cohesion and microtubule forces. Furthermore a modest increase in centrosome separation has major impact on Golgi organization and cell migration.     

Centrosome Function: Sometimes Less Is More

Tight regulation of centrosome duplication is critical to ensure that centrosome number doubles once and only once per cell cycle. Superimposed onto this centrosome duplication cycle is a functional centrosome cycle in which they alternate between phases of quiescence and robust microtubule (MT) nucleation and MT-anchoring activities. In vertebrate cycling cells, interphase centrioles accumulate less pericentriolar material (PCM), reducing their MT nucleation capacity. In mitosis, centrosomes mature, accumulating more PCM to increase their nucleation and anchoring capacities to form robust MT asters. Interestingly, functional cycles of centrosomes can be altered to suit the cell's needs. Some interphase centrosomes function as a microtubule-organizing center by increasing their ability to anchor MTs to form centrosomal radial arrays. Other interphase centrosomes maintain their MT nucleation capacity but reduce/eliminate their MT-anchoring capacity. Recent work demonstrates that Drosophila cells take this to the extreme, whereby centrioles lose all detectable PCM during interphase, offering an explanation as to how centrosome-deficient flies develop to adulthood. Drosophila stem cells further modify the functional cycle by differentially regulating their two centrioles – a situation that seems important for stem cell asymmetric divisions, as misregulation of centrosome duplication in stem/progenitor cells can promote tumor formation. Here, we review recent findings that describe variations in the functional cycle of centrosomes.     

Functional role of centrosomes in spindle assembly and organization

The centrosome is the main MT organizing center in animal cells, and has traditionally been regarded as essential for organization of the bipolar spindle that facilitates chromosome segregation during mitosis. Centrosomes are associated with the poles of the mitotic spindle, and several cell types require these organelles for spindle formation. However, most plant cells and some female meiotic systems get along without this organelle, and centrosome‐independent spindle assembly has now been identified within some centrosome containing cells. How can such observations, which point to mutually incompatible conclusions regarding the requirement of centrosomes in spindle formation, be interpreted? With emphasis on the functional role of centrosomes, this article summarizes the current models of spindle formation, and outlines how observations obtained from spindle assembly assays in vitro may reconcile conflicting opinions about the mechanism of spindle assembly. It is further described how Drosophila mutants are used to address the functional interrelationships between individual centrosomal proteins and spindle formation in vivo. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Centriole inheritance

Early cell biologists perceived centrosomes to be permanent cellular structures. Centrosomes were observed to reproduce once each cycle and to orchestrate assembly a transient mitotic apparatus that segregated chromosomes and a centrosome to each daughter at the completion of cell division. Centrosomes are composed of a pair of centrioles buried in a complex pericentriolar matrix. The bulk of microtubules in cells lie with one end buried in the pericentriolar matrix and the other extending outward into the cytoplasm. Centrioles recruit and organize pericentriolar material. As a result, centrioles dominate microtubule organization and spindle assembly in cells born with centrosomes. Centrioles duplicate in concert with chromosomes during the cell cycle. At the onset of mitosis, sibling centrosomes separate and establish a bipolar spindle that partitions a set of chromosomes and a centrosome to each daughter cell at the completion of mitosis and cell division. Centriole inheritance has historically been ascribed to a template mechanism in which the parental centriole contributed to, if not directed, assembly of a single new centriole once each cell cycle. It is now clear that neither centrioles nor centrosomes are essential to cell proliferation. This review examines the recent literature on inheritance of centrioles in animal cells.Key words: centrosome, centriol, spindle, mitosis, microtubule, cell cycle, checkpoints     

Nucleoporin Nup62 maintains centrosome homeostasis

Centrosomes are comprised of 2 orthogonally arranged centrioles surrounded by the pericentriolar material (PCM), which serves as the main microtubule organizing center of the animal cell. More importantly, centrosomes also control spindle polarity and orientation during mitosis. Recently, we and other investigators discovered that several nucleoporins play critical roles during cell division. Here, we show that nucleoporin Nup62 plays a novel role in centrosome integrity. Knockdown of Nup62 induced mitotic arrest in G₂/M phases and mitotic cell death. Depletion of Nup62 using RNA interference results in defective centrosome segregation and centriole maturation during the G₂ phase. Moreover, Nup62 depletion in human cells leads to the appearance of multinucleated cells and induces the formation of multipolar centrosomes, centriole synthesis defects, dramatic spindle orientation defects, and centrosome component rearrangements that impair cell bi-polarity. Our results also point to a potential role of Nup62 in targeting gamma-tubulin and SAS-6 to the centrioles.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">Ab ovo or de novo?</Emphasis> Mechanisms of centriole duplication

The centrosome, an organelle comprising centrioles and associated pericentriolar material, is the major microtubule organizing center in animal cells. For the cell to form a bipolar mitotic spindle and ensure proper chromosome segregation at the end of each cell cycle, it is paramount that the cell contains two and only two centrosomes. Because the number of centrosomes in the cell is determined by the number of centrioles, cells have evolved elaborate mechanisms to control centriole biogenesis and to tightly coordinate this process with DNA replication. Here we review key proteins involved in centriole assembly, compare two major modes of centriole biogenesis, and discuss the mechanisms that ensure stringency of centriole number.     

Breaking the ties that bind: new advances in centrosome biology

The centrosome, which consists of two centrioles and the surrounding pericentriolar material, is the primary microtubule-organizing center (MTOC) in animal cells. Like chromosomes, centrosomes duplicate once per cell cycle and defects that lead to abnormalities in the number of centrosomes result in genomic instability, a hallmark of most cancer cells. Increasing evidence suggests that the separation of the two centrioles (disengagement) is required for centrosome duplication. After centriole disengagement, a proteinaceous linker is established that still connects the two centrioles. In G2, this linker is resolved (centrosome separation), thereby allowing the centrosomes to separate and form the poles of the bipolar spindle. Recent work has identified new players that regulate these two processes and revealed unexpected mechanisms controlling the centrosome cycle.     

The centrosome and bipolar spindle assembly

In vertebrate somatic cells the centrosome functions as the major microtubule-organizing center (MTOC), which splits and separates to form the poles of the mitotic spindle. However, the role of the centriole-containing centrosome in the formation of bipolar mitotic spindles continues to be controversial. Cells normally containing centrosomes are still able to build bipolar spindles after their centrioles have been removed or ablated. In naturally occurring cellular systems that lack centrioles - such as plant cells and many oocytes - bipolar spindles form in the complete absence of canonical centrosomes. These observations have led to the notion that centrosomes play no role during mitosis. However, recent work has re-examined spindle assembly in the absence of centrosomes, both in cells that naturally lack them, and those that have had them experimentally removed. The results of these studies suggest that an appreciation of microtubule network organization- both before and after nuclear envelope breakdown (NEB) - is the key to understanding the mechanisms that regulate spindle assembly and the generation of bipolarity.     

Rootletin forms centriole-associated filaments and functions in centrosome cohesion

After duplication of the centriole pair during S phase, the centrosome functions as a single microtubule-organizing center until the onset of mitosis, when the duplicated centrosomes separate for bipolar spindle formation. The mechanisms regulating centrosome cohesion and separation during the cell cycle are not well understood. In this study, we analyze the protein rootletin as a candidate centrosome linker component. As shown by immunoelectron microscopy, endogenous rootletin forms striking fibers emanating from the proximal ends of centrioles. Moreover, rootletin interacts with C-Nap1, a protein previously implicated in centrosome cohesion. Similar to C-Nap1, rootletin is phosphorylated by Nek2 kinase and is displaced from centrosomes at the onset of mitosis. Whereas the overexpression of rootletin results in the formation of extensive fibers, small interfering RNA-mediated depletion of either rootletin or C-Nap1 causes centrosome splitting, suggesting that both proteins contribute to maintaining centrosome cohesion. The ability of rootletin to form centriole-associated fibers suggests a dynamic model for centrosome cohesion based on entangling filaments rather than continuous polymeric linkers.     

The Plk1 target Kizuna stabilizes mitotic centrosomes to ensure spindle bipolarity

Formation of a bipolar spindle is essential for faithful chromosome segregation at mitosis. Because centrosomes define spindle poles, defects in centrosome number and structural organization can lead to a loss of bipolarity. In addition, microtubule-mediated pulling and pushing forces acting on centrosomes and chromosomes are also important for bipolar spindle formation. Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) is a highly conserved Ser/Thr kinase that has essential roles in the formation of a bipolar spindle with focused poles. However, the mechanism by which Plk1 regulates spindle-pole formation is poorly understood. Here, we identify a novel centrosomal substrate of Plk1, Kizuna (Kiz), depletion of which causes fragmentation and dissociation of the pericentriolar material from centrioles at prometaphase, resulting in multipolar spindles. We demonstrate that Kiz is critical for establishing a robust mitotic centrosome architecture that can endure the forces that converge on the centrosomes during spindle formation, and suggest that Plk1 maintains the integrity of the spindle poles by phosphorylating Kiz.     

A non-canonical mode of microtubule organization operates throughout pre-implantation development in mouse

In dividing animal cells, the centrosome, comprising centrioles and surrounding pericentriolar-material (PCM), is the major interphase microtubule-organizing center (MTOC), arranging a polarized array of microtubules (MTs) that controls cellular architecture. The mouse embryo is a unique setting for investigating the role of centrosomes in MT organization, since the early embryo is acentrosomal, and centrosomes emerge de novo during early cleavages. Here we use embryos from a GFP::CETN2 transgenic mouse to observe the emergence of centrosomes and centrioles in embryos, and show that unfocused acentriolar centrosomes first form in morulae (~16–32-cell stage) and become focused at the blastocyst stage (~64–128 cells) concomitant with the emergence of centrioles. We then used high-resolution microscopy and dynamic tracking of MT growth events in live embryos to examine the impact of centrosome emergence upon interphase MT dynamics. We report that pre-implantation mouse embryos of all stages employ a non-canonical mode of MT organization that generates a complex array of randomly oriented MTs that are preferentially nucleated adjacent to nuclear and plasmalemmal membranes and cell-cell interfaces. Surprisingly, however, cells of the early embryo continue to employ this mode of interphase MT organization even after the emergence of centrosomes. Centrosomes are found at MT-sparse sites and have no detectable impact upon interphase MT dynamics. To our knowledge, the early embryo is unique among proliferating cells in adopting an acentrosomal mode of MT organization despite the presence of centrosomes, revealing that the transition to a canonical mode of interphase MT organization remains incomplete prior to implantation.     

Generation and Fates of Supernumerary Centrioles in Dividing Cells

The centrosome is a subcellular organelle from which a cilium assembles. Since centrosomes function as spindle poles during mitosis, they have to be present as a pair in a cell. How the correct number of centrosomes is maintained in a cell has been a major issue in the fields of cell cycle and cancer biology. Centrioles, the core of centrosomes, assemble and segregate in close connection to the cell cycle. Abnormalities in centriole numbers are attributed to decoupling from cell cycle regulation. Interestingly, supernumerary centrioles are commonly observed in cancer cells. In this review, we discuss how supernumerary centrioles are generated in diverse cellular conditions. We also discuss how the cells cope with supernumerary centrioles during the cell cycle.     

Nek5 promotes centrosome integrity in interphase and loss of centrosome cohesion in mitosis

Nek5 is a poorly characterized member of the NIMA-related kinase family, other members of which play roles in cell cycle progression and primary cilia function. Here, we show that Nek5, similar to Nek2, localizes to the proximal ends of centrioles. Depletion of Nek5 or overexpression of kinase-inactive Nek5 caused unscheduled separation of centrosomes in interphase, a phenotype also observed upon overexpression of active Nek2. However, separated centrosomes that resulted from Nek5 depletion remained relatively close together, exhibited excess recruitment of the centrosome linker protein rootletin, and had reduced levels of Nek2. In addition, Nek5 depletion led to loss of PCM components, including γ-tubulin, pericentrin, and Cdk5Rap2, with centrosomes exhibiting reduced microtubule nucleation. Upon mitotic entry, Nek5-depleted cells inappropriately retained centrosome linker components and exhibited delayed centrosome separation and defective chromosome segregation. Hence, Nek5 is required for the loss of centrosome linker proteins and enhanced microtubule nucleation that lead to timely centrosome separation and bipolar spindle formation in mitosis.     

IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY OF FERTILIZATION AND PARTHENOGENESIS IN LAMINARIA ANGUSTATA (PHAEOPHYTA)1

Normal fertilization and parthenogenesis of unfertilized eggs were observed in Laminaria angustata Kjellman by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy using a tubulin antibody. Sperm aster formation did not occur at plasmogamy. The centrosome of the egg gradually disappeared. Shortly after karyogamy, one centrosome reappeared near the zygote nucleus. During mitosis, the centrosome replicated and the daughter centrosomes migrated to opposite poles. The mitotic spindle was formed by microtubules that elongated from both poles. After the first cell division, each of the daughter cells received one centrosome that persisted throughout the development of the sporophyte. During parthenogenetic development, abnormal mono-, tri-, and multi-polar spindles were formed. These abnormal spindles caused abnormal nuclear and cytoplasmic division. Thus, cells were produced with 1) no nuclei, 2) multiple nuclei, 3) irregular numbers of chromosomes, and/or 4) no centrosomes. This is one of the reasons for the abortion and abnormal morphogenesis during parthenogenesis. Ultrastructural observations showed that, although cells of some parthogenetic sporophytes have centrioles, cells of almost all abnormally shaped parthenogenetic sporophytes lack centrioles. These results suggest that centrioles are required for normal centrosomal functions in Laminaria. Although centrioles are inherited paternally, some centrosomal material appears to be present or produced de novo in unfertilized eggs.     

The Caenorhabditis elegans centrosomal protein SPD-2 is required for both pericentriolar material recruitment and centriole duplication

BACKGROUND: The centrosome is composed of a centriole pair and pericentriolar material (PCM). By marking the site of PCM assembly, the centrioles define the number of centrosomes present in the cell. The PCM, in turn, is responsible for the microtubule (MT) nucleation activity of centrosomes. Therefore, in order to assemble a functional bipolar mitotic spindle, a cell needs to control both centriole duplication and PCM recruitment. To date, however, the molecular mechanisms that govern these two processes still remain poorly understood. RESULTS: Here we show that SPD-2 is a novel component of the C. elegans centrosome. SPD-2 localizes to the centriole throughout the cell cycle and accumulates on the PCM during mitosis. We show that SPD-2 requires SPD-5 for its accumulation on the PCM and that in the absence of SPD-2, centrosome assembly fails. We further show that centriole duplication is also defective in spd-2(RNAi) embryos, but not in spd-5(RNAi) embryos, where PCM recruitment is efficiently blocked. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our results suggest that SPD-2 may link PCM recruitment and centriole duplication in C. elegans. SPD-2 shares homology with a human centrosome protein, suggesting that this key component of the C. elegans centrosome is evolutionarily conserved.     

The effect of taxol on centrosome function and microtubule organization in apical cells of Sphacelaria rigidula (Phaeophyceae)

Treatment of interphase apical cells of Sphacelaria rigidula Kützing with 10 μmol L^?1 taxol for 4 h induced drastic changes in microtubule (MT) organization. In normal cells these MTs converge on the centrosomes and are nucleated from the pericentriolar area. After treatment, the endoplasmic, perinuclear and centrosome‐associated MT almost disappeared, and a massive assembly of cortical/subcortical, well‐organized MT bundles was observed. The bundles tended to be axially oriented, usually following the cylindrical wall, although other orientations were not excluded. The MTs in the apical part of the cell seemed to reach the cortex of the apical dome, sometimes bending to follow its curvature, whereas those in the basal portion of the cell terminated close to the transverse wall. Mitotic cells were also highly affected. Typical metaphase stages were very rarely found, and typical anaphase arrangements of chromosomes were completely absent. The chromosomes usually appeared to be dispersed singly or in small groups. Different atypical mitotic configurations were observed, depending on the stage of the cell cycle when the treatment started. The position and the orientation of the atypical mitotic spindles was disturbed. The nuclear envelope was completely disintegrated. The separation of the duplicated centrioles, as well as their usual perinuclear position, was also disturbed. Cortical MT bundles similar to those found in interphase cells were not found in the affected mitotic cells. In contrast, numerous MTs, without definite focal points, were found in the pericentriolar areas. Cytokinesis was inhibited by taxol treatment. The perinuclear and centrosome‐associated MTs found in mitotic cells were gradually replaced by a MT system similar to that of interphase cells. When the cytokinetic diaphragm had already been initiated when taxol treatment began, MTs were found on the cytokinetic plane, a phenomenon not observed in normal untreated cells. The results show clearly that: (i) in interphase cells the ability of centrosomes to nucleate MTs is intensely disturbed by taxol; (ii) centrosome dynamics in MT nucleation vary during the cell cycle; and (iii) taxol strongly affects mitosis and cytokinesis. In addition, it seems that the cortical/subcortical cytoplasm of interphase cells assumes the capacity to form numerous MT bundles.