Effect of regulated expression of the fragile histidine traid gene on cell cycle and proliferation

The mechanism of tumor suppressor action of the fragile histidine triad (FHIT) gene is unknown. Disruption of cell cycle regulation leads to the tumor formation and many tumor suppressor genes suppress tumorigenesis through their effect on cell cycle regulation. We examined the expression of FHIT during the cell cycle, and determined whether overexpression of FHIT affects cell cycle kinetics and apoptosis. The FHIT cDNA was cloned into the ecdysone-inducible expression vector in both the sense and antisense orientations. Overexpression of the sense or antisense construct did not affect cell proliferation, cell cycle distribution or apoptosis in human 293T cells. Analysis of the FHIT expression in 293T cells collected at various cell cycle phases showed that the expression of FHIT is not under cell cycle regulation. These results indicate that the tumor suppressor activity of the FHIT gene may be independent of an effect on the cell cycle and apoptosis mechanisms.     

Interview with the retinoblastoma family members: Do they help each other?

The ultimate destiny of a cell to undergo division, differentiation, survival, and death results from an intricate balance between multiple regulators including oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, and cell cycle associated proteins. Deregulation of the cell cycle machinery switches the phenotype from a normal cell to a cancerous cell. Fundamental alterations of tumor suppressor genes may result in an unregulated cell cycle with the accumulation of mutations and eventual neoplastic transformation. As such, one may define cancer as a genetic disease of the cell cycle. In this review, we will emphasize our current understanding of how the cell cycle machinery maintains cellular homeostasis by studying the consequences of its deregulation.     

Analysis of Tumor Suppressor Genes Using Transgenic Mice

Identification and analysis of tumor suppressor genes has relied chiefly upon studies of human sporadic tumors and of tumors harvested from familial cancer syndrome patients. One methodology that is proving to be extremely useful both in analyzing the function of these genes and in identifying new tumor suppressor genes involves the creation of transgenic mice that contain targeted mutations that functionally inactivate tumor suppressor genes. Studies using such mice have provided insight into the role of tumor suppressor genes in cell growth and in embryonic development. The creation of mice that harbor mutations in one or both alleles of a targeted gene has permitted anin vivoanalysis of the tumor suppressing properties of the gene and facilitated investigation of cell cycle control and differentiation of multiple cell lineages within the organism. Sophistication of gene targeting techniques will likely result in the creation of more lines of mice bearing genetic modifications in tumor suppressor genes, permitting an even finer detailed analysis of tumor suppressor gene functions.     

Inactivated tumor suppressor Rb by nitric oxide promotes mitosis in human breast cancer cells

Inactivation of tumor suppressor protein retinoblastoma (Rb) is important mechanism for the G1/S transition during cell cycle progression. Human breast cancer cells T47D release great amount of nitric oxide (NO), but its relation to tumor suppressor Rb is unknown. In this study, it is shown that NO induces phosphorylation and inactivation of Rb tumor suppressor protein, increasing G2/M phase and cell proliferation of breast cancer cells T47D. NO did not induce changes in p53 ser-15 phosphorylation, the most phosphorylated site of p53 during its activation. These data indicate that NO induces cell proliferation through the Rb pathway. NO phosphorylates and inactivates tumor suppressor protein Rb inducing mitosis by the p53 independent pathway in breast cancer cell.     

Principles of tumor suppression

Molecular genetic studies of familial cancer syndromes identified and defined the recessive nature of tumor suppressor genes and resolved the paradox of why tumors arising in such families exhibited an autosomally dominant pattern of inheritance. Subsequent characterization of tumor suppressor proteins revealed their widespread involvement in sporadic cancers and pinpointed key mechanisms that protect animals against tumor development. We now recognize that tumor suppressor genes regulate diverse cellular activities, including cell cycle checkpoint responses, detection and repair of DNA damage, protein ubiquitination and degradation, mitogenic signaling, cell specification, differentiation and migration, and tumor angiogenesis. Their study has become a centerpiece of contemporary cancer research.     

抑癌基因P16在肺癌中的研究进展

抑癌基因P16与细胞周期调控密切相关,其主要作用是参与细胞周期过程,它通过细胞周期与其它癌基因及肿瘤抑制基因相互作用成为正常细胞增殖的调控因子。P16基因主要通过基因缺失、点突变及甲基化而失活,已证实该基因的失活与多种肿瘤的形成与转移密切相关。通过各种分子生物学技术检测出它在肿瘤中的表达,将有助于判断肿瘤的恶性程度、浸润深度及预后,为制定合理的治疗方案提供依据。P16是已知的抑癌基因中唯一通过直接抑制细胞周期而抑制细胞生长的基因,在肿瘤治疗方面有很大的应用前景。P16基因突变在人类恶性肿瘤中普遍存在,因此,有关p16基因的研究已经成为当前分子生物学和分子遗传学研究的重要课题。本文就p16基因的分子生物学特性及它与肺癌的关系作一综述。     

Drosophila WARTS–tumor suppressor and member of the myotonic dystrophy protein kinase family

Tumor suppressor genes represent a broad class of genes that normally function in the negative regulation of cell proliferation. Loss-of-function mutations in these genes lead to unrestrained cell proliferation and tumor formation. A fundamental understanding of how tumor suppressor genes regulate cell proliferation and differentiation should reveal important aspects of signalling pathways and cell cycle control. A recent report describing the Drosophila tumor suppressor gene warts has implications in the study of the human myotonic dystrophy gene⁽¹⁾. These genes encode members of a cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase subfamily that includes other plant and animal orthologues.     

Interaction of two tumor suppressors: Phosphatase CTDSPL and Rb protein

Earlier we established that CTDSPL gene encoding small carboxy-terminal domain serine phosphatase can be considered a classical tumor suppressor gene. Besides, transfection of tumor cell line MCF-7 with CTDSPL led to the content decrease of inactive phosphorylated form of another tumor suppressor, retinoblastoma protein (Rb), and subsequently to cell cycle arrest at the G1/S boundary. This result implied that small phosphatase CTDSPL is able to specifically dephosphorylate and activate Rb protein. In order to add some fuel to this hypothesis, in the present work we studied the interaction of two tumor suppressors CTDSPL and Rb in vitro. GST pool-down assay revealed that CTDSPL is able to precipitate Rb protein from MCF-7 cell extracts, while surface plasmon resonance technique showed that interaction of the two proteins is direct. Results of this study reassert that phosphatase CTDSPL and Rb could be involved in the common mechanism of cell cycle regulation.     

Terminal osteoblast differentiation, mediated by runx2 and p27KIP1, is disrupted in osteosarcoma

The molecular basis for the inverse relationship between differentiation and tumorigenesis is unknown. The function of runx2, a master regulator of osteoblast differentiation belonging to the runt family of tumor suppressor genes, is consistently disrupted in osteosarcoma cell lines. Ectopic expression of runx2 induces p27KIP1, thereby inhibiting the activity of S-phase cyclin complexes and leading to the dephosphorylation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (pRb) and a G1 cell cycle arrest. Runx2 physically interacts with the hypophosphorylated form of pRb, a known coactivator of runx2, thereby completing a feed-forward loop in which progressive cell cycle exit promotes increased expression of the osteoblast phenotype. Loss of p27KIP1 perturbs transient and terminal cell cycle exit in osteoblasts. Consistent with the incompatibility of malignant transformation and permanent cell cycle exit, loss of p27KIP1 expression correlates with dedifferentiation in high-grade human osteosarcomas. Physiologic coupling of osteoblast differentiation to cell cycle withdrawal is mediated through runx2 and p27KIP1, and these processes are disrupted in osteosarcoma.     

Cdk inhibitors: on the threshold of checkpoints and development

The regulation of cyclin-dependent kinases is at the heart of cell cycle control and, by inference, the control of cell proliferation. Recent advances in regulation of these kinases have uncovered a group of small proteins that bind to and inhibit them, thus preventing cell cycle progression. Linking these proteins to tumor suppressor functions has provided a much sought after connection between cancer and cell cycle control.     

p27(Kip1): regulation and function of a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor and its misregulation in cancer

A major function of p27, also known as Kip1, is to bind and inhibit cyclin/cyclin-dependent kinase complexes, thereby blocking cell cycle progression. As p27 operates at the heart of the cell cycle, it is perhaps not surprising that it is emerging as a key player in multiple cell fate decisions including proliferation, differentiation, and cell death. The central role of p27 makes it important in a variety of disease processes that involve aberrations in cellular proliferation and other cell fates. Most notable among these processes is neoplasia. A large number of studies have reported that p27 expression is frequently downregulated in human tumors. In most tumor types, reduced p27 expression correlates with poor prognosis, making p27 a novel and powerful prognostic marker. In addition to these practical implications, murine and tissue culture models have shown that p27 is a potent tumor suppressor gene for multiple epithelially derived neoplasias. Loss of p27 cooperates with mutations in several oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes to facilitate tumor growth, indicating that p27 may be a "nodal point" for tumor suppression. In contrast to most tumor suppressor genes studied to date, which are recessive at the cellular level, p27 is haploinsufficient for tumor suppression. The fact that tumor suppression by p27 is critically dependent on the absolute level of p27 expression indicates that p27 acts as a rheostat rather than as an on/off switch to control growth and neoplasia.     

Cell Cycle Restriction Is More Important Than Apoptosis Induction for RASSF1A Protein Tumor Suppression

The Ras association domain family protein 1A (RASSF1A) is arguably one of the most frequently inactivated tumor suppressors in human cancer. RASSF1A modulates apoptosis via the Hippo and Bax pathways but also modulates the cell cycle. In part, cell cycle regulation appears to be dependent upon the ability of RASSF1A to complex with microtubules and regulate their dynamics. Which property of RASSF1A, apoptosis induction or microtubule regulation, is responsible for its tumor suppressor function is not known. We have identified a short conserved motif that is essential for the binding of RASSF family proteins with microtubule-associated proteins. By making a single point mutation in the motif, we were able to generate a RASSF1A variant that retains wild-type apoptotic properties but completely loses the ability to bind microtubule-associated proteins and complex with microtubules. Comparison of this mutant to wild-type RASSF1A showed that, despite retaining its proapoptotic properties, the mutant was completely unable to induce cell cycle arrest or suppress the tumorigenic phenotype. Therefore, it appears that the cell cycle/microtubule effects of RASSF1A are key to its tumor suppressor function rather than its apoptotic effects.     

Depletion of the nucleolar protein nucleostemin causes G1 cell cycle arrest via the p53 pathway

Nucleostemin (NS) is a nucleolar protein expressed in adult and embryo-derived stem cells, transformed cell lines, and tumors. NS decreases when proliferating cells exit the cell cycle, but it is unknown how NS is controlled, and how it participates in cell growth regulation. Here, we show that NS is down-regulated by the tumor suppressor p14(ARF) and that NS knockdown elevates the level of tumor suppressor p53. NS knockdown led to G1 cell cycle arrest in p53-positive cells but not in cells in which p53 was genetically deficient or depleted by small interfering RNA knockdown. These results demonstrate that, in the cells investigated, the level of NS is regulated by p14(ARF) and the control of the G1/S transition by NS operates in a p53-dependent manner.