Comparison of promoter suppression in avian and murine retrovirus vectors.

Previously, we described "promoter suppression" in infectious retrovirus vectors with two genes and an internal promoter. Here, we examined several parameters of promoter suppression and found that the amount of suppression in an integrated retrovirus vector was dependent both on whether the vector was derived from spleen necrosis virus or murine leukemia virus and on which internal promoter was present in the vector. Murine leukemia virus vectors showed less suppression than analogous spleen necrosis virus vectors. Furthermore, the amount of suppression was not dependent on either the relative strengths of the promoters nor the distance between the promoters. Moreover, we found that in vectors in which one promoter was suppressed, there was an inverse correlation between the DNaseI sensitivity of the chromatin surrounding a promoter and the suppression of its expression.     

Construction of strong mammalian promoters by random cis-acting element elongation

Synthetic oligonucleotides containing one of four kinds of cis-acting elements, binding sites for activating protein-1 (AP-1), nuclear factor kappaB (NF-kappaB), CArG binding factor A (CBF-A), and nuclear factor Y (NF-Y), were randomly ligated to construct DNA fragments. These fragments were inserted into the SalI site of a promoter probe vector; pGL3-TATASal, which is located immediately upstream of the TATA box sequence of the human heme oxygenase 1 gene and linked to the luciferase gene to construct 11 plasmid vectors. When these vectors were introduced into PC-3 cells of human prostate cancer, 6 out of the 11 transfectants showed a significantly higher luciferase activity than pGL3-TATASal. The two strongest promoters (clone 6 and clone 11) were investigated further Clone 6 turned out to be the strongest, showing a 3.0- and 8.4-fold activity in comparison to the two frequently used promoters--the cytomegalovirus (CMV) immediate early promoter and the simian virus 40 (SV40) early promoter respectively. Clone 11 was less active than clone 6, but still showed higher activity than the two promoters. When the plasmids were introduced into nine other cell lines, their activities varied but were still comparable to the two promoters. These results indicate that the method used here is simple and efficient for constructing strong promoters that are potentially useful for vectors in either gene therapy or recombinant vaccine.     

Construction of Stress Responsive Synthetic Promoters and Analysis of Their Activity in Transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana

To obtain strong inducible promoters to drive abiotic stress-inducible transgene expression with minimal negative effects, we constructed three artificial synthetic promoters (EKCM, EKCRM, and ECCRM) comprising multiple cis-acting stress-response elements. Each promoter was fused independently to the β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene, and GUS expression was analyzed in stable expression systems in Arabidopsis thaliana. T2 transgenic progenies showed integration of the promoter-GUS construct in their genome. RT-PCR assays and histochemical staining analysis showed that GUS expression driven by each promoter increased under desiccation, cold, and high salt conditions. The activity of synthetic promoters, assessed by fluorometric quantitative analysis of GUS enzyme activity, was significantly higher than that of the rd29A promoter under various stress treatments. The most powerful promoter, EKCM, allowed about 1.29-fold in GUS activity relative to the rd29A promoter, on average, under dehydration conditions. All three synthetic promoters could drive stress-inducible GUS expression in different organs of transgenic Arabidopsis. These synthetic promoters represent valuable tools for improving the stress tolerance of crops.     

A Comparison of Constitutive Promoters for Expression of Transgenes in Alfalfa (Medicago Sativa)

The activity of constitutive promoters was compared in transgenic alfalfa plants using two marker genes. Three promoters, the 35S promoter from cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV), the cassava vein mosaic virus (CsVMV) promoter, and the sugarcane bacilliform badnavirus (ScBV) promoter were each fused to the beta-glucuronidase (gusA) gene. The highest GUS enzyme activity was obtained using the CsVMV promoter and all alfalfa cells assayed by in situ staining had high levels of enzyme activity. The 35S promoter was expressed in leaves, roots, and stems at moderate levels, but the promoter was not active in stem pith cells, root cortical cells, or in the symbiotic zones of nodules. The ScBV promoter was active primarily in vascular tissues throughout the plant. In leaves, GUS activity driven by the CsVMV promoter was approximately 24-fold greater than the activity from the 35S promoter and 38-fold greater than the activity from the ScBV promoter. Five promoters, the double 35S promoter, figwort mosaic virus (FMV) promoter, CsVMV promoter, ScBV promoter, and alfalfa small subunit Rubisco (RbcS) promoter were used to control expression of a cDNA from Trichoderma atroviride encoding an endochitinase (ech42). Highest chitinase activity in leaves, roots, and root nodules was obtained in plants containing the CsVMV:ech42 transgene. Plants expressing the endochitinase were challenged with Phoma medicaginis var. medicaginis, the causal agent of spring black stem and leaf spot of alfalfa. Although endochitinase activity in leaves of transgenic plants was 50- to 2650-fold greater than activity in control plants, none of the transgenic plants showed a consistent increase in disease resistance compared to controls. The high constitutive levels of both GUS and endochitinase activity obtained demonstrate that the CsVMV promoter is useful for high-level transgene expression in alfalfa.     

Bi-directional Duplex Promoters with Duplicated Enhancers Significantly Increase Transgene Expression in Grape and Tobacco

Novel bi-directional duplex promoters (BDDP) were constructed by placing two identical core promoters divergently on both upstream and downstream sides of their duplicated enhancer elements. Estimates of promoter function were obtained by creating versions of CaMV 35S and CsVMV BDDPs that contained reporter marker genes encoding beta-glucuronidase (GUS) and enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) interchangeably linked either to the upstream or downstream core promoters. GUS was used for quantitative analysis of promoter function, whereas, EGFP allowed visual qualitative evaluation. In addition, the GUS and EGFP genes placed in downstream positions were modified by translational fusion with neomycin phosphotransferase (NPTII) to allow simultaneous monitoring of promoter activity and selection of stable transformants. These versions of BDDP were compared with each other and with equivalent unidirectional constructs by evaluating their expression in grape and tobacco. For 35S promoter constructs tested in grape somatic embryos (SE), BDDP exhibited transient GUS expression 206- and 300-fold greater in downstream and upstream configurations, respectively, compared to a unidirectional 35S core promoter. Compared with a unidirectional double enhanced 35S promoter, BDDPs exhibited 0.5- and 3-fold increased GUS expression from downstream and upstream core promoters, respectively. The same differences in expression levels determined quantitatively with GUS were distinguished qualitatively with EGFP. Constructs using CsVMV core promoters yielded results relative to those obtained with 35S promoter. For example, the upstream BDDP CsVMV core promoter provided a 200-fold increase in GUS expression compared to a unidirectional core promoter. However, CsVMV promoter was found to have higher promoter activity than 35S promoter in both BDDP and unidirectional constructs. Incorporation of an additional duplicated enhancer element to BDDPs resulted in increased expression. For example, a 35S BDDP with two divergently arranged duplicated enhancer elements resulted in over a 6-fold increase in GUS expression in stably transformed tobacco plants compared to a BDDP with one duplicated enhancer element. Data demonstrate that BDDP composed of divergently-arranged core promoters separated by duplicated enhancers, all derived from a single promoter sequence, can be used to significantly enhance transgene expression and to direct synchronized expression of multiple transgenes.     

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) promoters are regulated by the HBV enhancer in a tissue-specific manner.

The activities of the individual hepatitis B virus (HBV) promoters and the effects of the HBV enhancer on these promoters in several human cell types have been compared by measuring the activity and RNA levels of the linked reporter function chloramphenicol acetyltransferase. The relative promoter activities in the human HepG2 (liver), HeLa, and HS27 (fibroblast) cell lines are in the order precore greater than X greater than preS2 greater than preS1; thus, the promoters of the gene producing the largest quantity of viral proteins have relatively low activity. The juxtaposition of the HBV enhancer in either orientation increased the promoter activities only modestly (2- to 5-fold) in the nonliver cell lines, whereas it dramatically increased (20- to 100-fold) the promoter activities in the liver cell line. Thus, the HBV enhancer is especially active in liver cells. This may be one of the causes of hepatotrophicity of the virus.     

Similarities and differences between the subgenomic and minus-strand promoters of an RNA plant virus

Promoter regions required for minus-strand and subgenomic RNA synthesis have been mapped for several plus-strand RNA viruses. In general, the two types of promoters do not share structural features even though they are recognized by the same viral polymerase. The minus-strand promoter of Alfalfa mosaic virus (AMV), a plant virus of the family Bromoviridae, consists of a triloop hairpin (hpE) which is attached to a 3' tRNA-like structure (TLS). In contrast, the AMV subgenomic promoter consists of a single triloop hairpin that bears no sequence homology with hpE. Here we show that hpE, when detached from its TLS, can function as a subgenomic promoter in vitro and can replace the authentic subgenomic promoter in the live virus. Thus, the AMV subgenomic and minus-strand promoters are basically the same, but the minus-strand promoter is linked to a 3' TLS to force the polymerase to initiate at the very 3'end.