Treatment of Asthma by a Controlled-Release Theophylline Tablet Formulation: A Review of the North American Experience with Nocturnal Dosing

As many as 80 percent of asthmatics experience nighttime or early-morning episodes, which are difficult to treat and potentially fatal. The greater-than-normal amplitude of circadian airflow variation in many asthmatics contributes heavily to the genesis of the early ‘morning dip’. Beta-agonists and corticosteroids are of limited usefulness in nocturnal asthma, and slow-release theophylline drugs, while potentially effective, vary in 24-hr blood profile and hence their influence on nocturnal episodes. Traditional 12-hr ‘symmetric’ theophylline regimens, instead of meeting increased nocturnal demands, may actually produce lower night- than daytime blood levels. On the other hand, appropriately timed administration of a once-daily theophylline drug might provide maximum blood levels when needed and help stabilize 24-hr airflow.

Accumulated data, summarized in this review, demonstrate the chronotherapeutic potential of single-daily evening doses of a controlled-release theophylline preparation (Uniphyl® 400-mg tablets*) in nocturnal and early morning asthma. Nighttime blood concentrations with this regimen were higher than were those with Theo-Dur® tablets, ? B.I.D., in the same total daily doses, or with once-daily morning Uniphyl administration. In fed and fasted subjects, evening administration of Uniphyl 400-mg tablets was well tolerated and did not lead to ‘dose dumping.’ Clinically, this treatment demonstrated advantages over B.I.D. theophylline, over single-daily morning regimens, and over prior theophylline therapy. Advantages of the evening regimen included better early-morning airflow (without significant decline later in the day), more effective symptom control, better patient acceptance, fewer night awakenings, and the obvious convenience of once-daily dosing. In addition, lung function showed greater stability, throughout the day, with once-daily evening therapy than with traditional 12 hr dosing.

Uniphyl 400-mg tablets may be administered once daily to provide maximum blood levels at the time of peak bronchoconstriction, whether at night or during the day.     

Once-Daily Evening Administration of Uniphyl Tablets: Announcement of First Available Chronotherapy of Nocturnal Asthma

Theophylline chronotherapy recently became a reality for patients with reversible airways disease. Uniphyl^R 400 mg tablets (controlled-release theophylline, the Purdue Frederick Company, Norwalk, Connecticut) are now indicated for once-daily evening administration, both in the United States and Canada. This development follows the previous use of Uniphyl tablets in once-daily morning doses and marks the first-available antiasthmatic treatment in North America to incorporate dosing time as an important therapeutic dimension. It reflects increasing recognition, by the medical community, of the need to consider the individual patient's timing of symptoms in relation to the kinetics of the drug.     

Once-Daily Evening Administration of Uniphyl Tablets: Announcement of First Available Chronotherapy of Nocturnal Asthma

Theophylline chronotherapy recently became a reality for patients with reversible airways disease. Uniphyl^R 400 mg tablets (controlled-release theophylline, the Purdue Frederick Company, Norwalk, Connecticut) are now indicated for once-daily evening administration, both in the United States and Canada. This development follows the previous use of Uniphyl tablets in once-daily morning doses and marks the first-available antiasthmatic treatment in North America to incorporate dosing time as an important therapeutic dimension. It reflects increasing recognition, by the medical community, of the need to consider the individual patient's timing of symptoms in relation to the kinetics of the drug.     

Theophylline steady-state pharmacokinetics: recent concepts and their application in chronotherapy of reactive airway diseases

With the introduction of sustained-release theophylline formulations for once-daily dosing or for unequally divided twice-daily dosing, comparison with conventional equally divided twice-daily dosing has been focused on nocturnal serum theophylline concentrations (STCs), plateau properties and peak-trough fluctuation. The merits of various steady-state characteristics such as nocturnal excess, plateau time, residual concentration, peak-trough fluctuation, swing and AUC fluctuation are illustrated by 15 data sets from 7 multiple-dose studies, each including either 10-12 healthy volunteers or 12-20 COPD-patients. In all of the studies, STCs were determined at least every 2 hr over a 24-hr period in steady-state. Included in the studies were 7 sustained-release theophylline formulations which were administered either once daily (in the morning or in the evening), or twice daily (either equally divided, or unequally divided with one-third of the dose being given in the morning and two-thirds in the evening.     

Theophylline Steady-State Pharmacokinetics: Recent Concepts and Their Application in Chronotherapy of Reactive Airway Diseases

With the introduction of sustained-release theophyllíne formulations for once-daily dosing or for unequally divided twice-daily dosing, comparison with conventional equally divided twice-daily dosing has been focused on nocturnal serum theophylline concentrations (STCs), plateau properties and peak-trough fluctuation. The merits of various steady-state characteristics such as nocturnal excess, plateau time, residual concentration, peak-trough fluctuation, swing and AUC fluctuation are illustrated by 15 data sets from 7 multiple-dose studies, each including either 10–12 healthy volunteers or 12–20 COPD-patients. In all of the studies, STCs were determined at least every 2 hr over a 24-hr period in steady-state. Included in the studies were 7 sustained-release theophylline formulations which were administered either once daily (in the morning or in the evening), or twice daily (either equally divided, or unequally divided with one-third of the dose being given in the morning and two-thirds in the evening).     

Treatment of nocturnal asthma: the role of sustained-release theophylline and oral beta-2-mimetics

In two double-blind, multiple-dose cross-over studies the therapeutic effects of SR theophylline preparations given once each night (mean 11.2 mg/kg per day) versus twice daily in equal doses (mean 10.3 mg/kg per day) (study I) and SR-terbutaline in equal doses (mean 0.25 mg/kg per day) versus SR theophylline in unequally divided daily doses (mean 5.3 mg/kg morning dose, 10.6 mg/kg evening dose) study II) were compared in 19 patients with nocturnal asthma. At the end of each treatment period drug serum concentrations and PEFR were measured every 2 hr over a 24-hr period. With the twice-daily, equally divided regimen, serum theophylline concentrations were lower at night than during the day (mean 9.4 +/- 0.9 versus 11.3 +/- 1.0 mg/l). With the single evening administration, serum theophylline concentrations were considerably higher at night (Cmax 16.3 +/- 1.4 mg/l) and the circadian variation of PEFR was significantly reduced. PEFR was higher during night and early morning (283 +/- 14 versus 217 +/- 11 l/min, P less than 0.005). During daytime in study II, PEFR values were slightly higher with theophylline than terbutaline. There was no significant difference in peak flow between either treatment during the night and early morning. However, additional use of inhaled beta-2-mimetics because of asthmatic attacks occurred more often during terbutaline (79 times in 8/10 patients) than theophylline treatment (29 times in 5/10 patients). Symptom scores, number of attacks and side-effects clearly favor the theophylline regimen. We conclude that for patients with nocturnal asthma a once-nightly dose of SR theophylline can be sufficient for stabilization of the airways.     

Treatment of Nocturnal Asthma: the Role of Sustained-Release Theophylline and Oral β-2-Mimetics

In two double-blind, multiple-dose cross-over studies the therapeutic effects of SR theophylline preparations given once each night (mean 11.2mg/kg per day) versus twice daily in equal doses (mean 10.3 mg/kg per day) (study I) and SR-terbutaline in equal doses (mean 0.25 mg/kg per day) versus SR theophylline in unequally divided daily doses (mean 5.3 mg/kg morning dose, 10.6 mg/kg evening dose) study II) were compared in 19 patients with nocturnal asthma. At the end of each treatment period drug serum concentrations and PEFR were measured every 2 hr over a 24-hr period. With the twice-daily, equally divided regimen, serum theophylline concentrations were lower at night than during the day (mean 9.4 ±0.9 versus 11.3± 1.0mg/l). With the single evening administration, serum theophylline concentrations were considerably higher at night (C_max16.3 ±1.4 mg/1) and the circadian variation of PEFR was significantly reduced. PEFR was higher during night and early morning (283 ±14 versus 217 ± 11 l/min, P< 0.005). During daytime in study II, PEFR values were slightly higher with theophylline than terbutaline. There was no significant difference in peak flow between either treatment during the night and early morning. However, additional use of inhaled β-2-mimetics because of asthmatic attacks occurred more often during terbutaline (79 times in 8/10 patients) than theophylline treatment (29 times in 5/10 patients). Symptom scores, number of attacks and side-effects clearly favor the theophylline regimen. We conclude that for patients with nocturnal asthma a once-nightly dose of SR theophylline can be sufficient for stabilization of the airways.     

Administration-time-dependency of the pharmacokinetic behavior and therapeutic effect of a once-a-day theophylline in asthmatic children

Using a double-blind, placebo-control, crossover study design, 8 asthmatic children (8-15 years) were evaluated for temporal patterns in airways function throughout separate study periods when treatment was placebo or Theo-24 once-daily on separate occasions at 0600, 1500 or 2100 hr. During 39-hr in-hospital observations, pulmonary function and serum theophylline concentrations (STC) were assessed every 3 hr under all treatments. The pharmacokinetics of Theo-24 varied greatly depending on the dosing time. For the afternoon and evening dosings, the Cmax, Tmax, AUC, % swing, % fluctuation, % AUC fluctuation, % nocturnal excess and Cav(2-6 hr) were all statistically significantly greater than for the morning dosing. Compared with the placebo regimen, dosing patients with Theo-24 at 1500 hr disrupted circadian patterns of airways function, especially airways patency, while dosing at 2100 hr, reduced the amplitude and shifted the acrophase of several spirometric measures to a slightly earlier time. Theo-24 treatment irrespective of dosing time resulted in comparable enhancement of the group 24-hr mean, minimum and maximum values of airways patency with reference to placebo baselines. Theo-24 dosing at 1500 or 2100 hr, however, resulted in the best effect on the airways as assessed by the 24-hr mean FEV 1.0 level in 7 of the 8 asthmatic children. When the drug was given at 1500 hr, the time of lowest FEV 1.0 was shifted from the nighttime hours in 5 of 8 patients. These findings suggest that clinicians need to individualize the theophylline dosing schedule of patients to best control the symptoms of asthma.     

Day-Night Differences in Steady-State Theophylline Pharmacokinetics in Asthmatic Children

Potential day-night differences of theophylline absorption and disposition were examined in day-active asthmatic children. Theophylline was given orally as TheoDur tablets and Somophyllin-CRT capsules (random crossover) every 12 hr (0700 and 1900), and patients were studied during two consecutive dosing intervals. In addition, patients were studied during the last 24 hr of a 48-hr continuous, intravenous aminophylline infusion. Serum theophylline concentrations were essentially constant during the intravenous infusion for the day and night periods. Thus, day and night clearances were nearly identical. Following oral administration of Somophyllin-CRT or TheoDur, areas under the serum concentration-time curves were greater during the day than the night, with Somophyllin-CRT yielding greater areas than TheoDur for both dosing intervals. Theophylline was absorbed more rapidly during the day than the night, as evidenced by a time to maximum concentration that occurred earlier in the daytime dosing interval. We conclude that theophylline clearance is not characterized by a circadian rhythm and that absorption of theophylline from Somophyllin-CRT and TheoDur is more rapid and complete during the day than the night.     

Double-blind Randomized Cross-over Trial of Nocturnal Elixir Theophylline Supplementation of a Twice-daily Sustained-Release Theophylline Tablet Formulation in Asthmatic Patients

Sixteen asthmatic patients with normal diurnal activity between 05:00 and 23:00 h participated in this randomized, multiple-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of evening supplementation of a 12-hourly sustained-release theophylline (SRT) regimen with a nonsustained-release theophylline (NSRT) formulation. The treatments were Nuelin SA (SRT) every 12 h plus, in the evening, either placebo or an additional dose of Nuelin liquid (NSRT), determined to raise the early morning (0300) plasma theophylline concentration (PTC) to 18 μ/ml by using the dose-concentration prediction equation established in a study conducted on healthy volunteers and reported in this journal. The 11-day trial included two 24-h inpa-tient periods during which PTCs and lung functions (PEF, FEV, FEF_25-75, and FVC) were determined every 2 h. The value of the prediction equation was confirmed when the early morning PTC, after evening supplementation with Nuelin Liquid, was raised nearly to the targeted 18 μg/ml. The nocturnal peak-to-trough fluctuation in PTC was larger during additional treatment with Nuelin liquid, but the nocturnal peak-to-trough fluctuation in lung function parameters decreased. Overall, airflow during the early morning hours (0100-0500) significantly improved during this chronotherapeutically optimized treatment of adding an NSRT product to the evening dose of a 12-hourly SRT regimen. Key Words: Nocturnal asthma—Chronotherapy—Sustained-release theophylline—Nonsustained-release theophylline—Forced vital capacity—Forced expiratory volume— Forced expiratory flow—Peak expiratory flow—Area under the maximum expiratory flow-volume curve.     

Steady state pharmacokinetics, metabolism and pharmacodynamics of theophylline in children after unequal twice-daily dosing of a new sustained-release formulation

This was an open-label study in 19 children aged 9-13 years, weighing 27-44 kg, with bronchial asthma. Twenty-four-hour steady-state concentrations of theophylline and its metabolites 1,3-dimethyl uric acid, 3-methyl xanthine and 1-methyl uric acid were assessed after daily dosing of 600 mg (ca 18 mg/kg/day) of the sustained-release theophylline micro-pellet sprinkle system BY158K, for 4 days. The dosing regimen used was an unequal twice-daily dose of 200 mg in the morning after breakfast and 400 mg in the evening after dinner. Twenty-four-hour peak expiratory flow (PEF) profiles were compared before treatment and at steady-state, along with lung function parameters after bronchial provocation. Mean values +/- SD (n = 16) of the steady-state characteristics were Cmin 6.8 +/- 2.1 mg/l, Cmax 14.5 +/- 4.8 mg/l and Cav 10.5 +/- 2.9 mg/l, the plateau time was 11.7 +/- 4.8 hr and peak-trough fluctuation and swing were 72 +/- 21 and 118 +/- 52%, respectively. There was an excellent reproducibility of theophylline pre-dose levels at corresponding time points of the 24-hr sampling period [r = 0.864 (p less than 0.001)]. Mean values +/- SD of the 24 hr average serum metabolite levels were 0.9 +/- 0.2 mg/1 for 1,3-dimethyl uric acid, 0.6 +/- 0.1 mg/1 for 3-methyl xanthine and 0.4 +/- 0.1 mg/1 for l-methyl uric acid. Lung function (n = 17) following bronchial provocation, improved in 10 children after theophylline treatment of 4 days, remained stable in 2 patients and deteriorated in 5 patients. Serum theophylline profiles and PEF profiles ran largely in parallel over the 24-hr period. Six children exhibited typical theophylline induced side-effects, headache (n = 3), nausea (n = 4), dizziness (n = 1), vomiting (n = 4), sleep disturbances (n = 1), pallor (n = 1) and tremor (n = 1), necessitating in 3 children one dose omission/reduction (n = 2) or subsequent dose reduction (n = 1). It has been shown that a twice daily dosing regimen with unequal doses of anhydrous theophylline (BY158K) is well suited to this population of fast metabolisers. The patients were well protected throughout the day, including the critical early morning hours.     

Effect of imidapril in dipper and nondipper hypertensive patients: comparison between morning and evening administration

The purpose of the study was to identify differences in the patterns of efficacy and duration of effects of imidapril administered at different times of the day (morning versus evening) in dipper and nondipper hypertensive patients. Twenty patients with untreated hypertension were classified into two groups: dippers (n = 9) and nondippers (n = 11). Imidapril (10 mg) was given at 07:00 or 18:00 for 4 weeks in a crossover fashion. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were monitored before and after morning and evening treatment every 30 min for 48h by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). In dipper hypertension, the mean 48h BP was reduced with both doses. The decrease in the diurnal BP was stronger when the drug was administered in the evening than morning, but without significant difference. In nondipper hypertension, the systolic BP decreased at night with both doses, but the extent of the nocturnal reduction in systolic BP was greater after morning therapy. There were no significant differences in the decrease in BP during the day or night between the morning and evening administrations. When imidapril was administered in the morning, its serum concentration reached a maximum at 16:00, and when the drug was administered in the evening, it reached a maximum at 6:00. In dipper hypertension, the time taken for the blood concentration of imidapril to reach a maximum changed depending on its time of administration, and the time when the maximum antihypertensive effect of the drug appeared was different. In nondipper hypertension, decreases in the BP were confirmed at night regardless of the time of administration; this might be caused by angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors effectively blocking the BP from increasing by activating the parasympathetic nervous system. Therefore, when assessing the effectiveness of antihypertensive agents, factors such as the various patterns of BP before therapy and administration time must be considered.     

Therapeutic advantage of unequal dosing of theophylline in patients with nocturnal asthma

Two theophylline treatments were compared in a randomized, multiple-dose, crossover study on 20 patients present with nonallergic bronchial asthma. Both products (E = Euphyllin CR, A = Afonilum Retard) were capsules containing micropellets. They were administered according to the recommendations of the manufactures and differed in the total daily theophylline dose (642 mg versus 500 mg), the partition of this dose (1/3 in the morning and 2/3 in the evening versus equal amounts in the morning and evening) and the timing of the evening dose (2200 hr versus 2000 hr). The patients were off oral theophyllines at least 2 days prior to study onset and no other drugs were allowed to be administered during the testing periods. On the 4th day of each study period, serum theophylline concentrations (STC) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEF) were determined every 2 hr. Compared with the 24-hr PEF reference profile taken prior to study onset, both theophylline treatments produced a significantly higher 24-hr PEF average (mesor). Treatment E resulted in significantly higher mesor than A; in addition, the PEF amplitude relative to the mesor was reduced by treatment E when compared with placebo.     

EFFECT OF IMIDAPRIL IN DIPPER AND NONDIPPER HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS: COMPARISON BETWEEN MORNING AND EVENING ADMINISTRATION

The purpose of the study was to identify differences in the patterns of efficacy and duration of effects of imidapril administered at different times of the day (morning versus evening) in dipper and nondipper hypertensive patients. Twenty patients with untreated hypertension were classified into two groups: dippers (n = 9) and nondippers (n = 11). Imidapril (10 mg) was given at 07:00 or 18:00 for 4 weeks in a crossover fashion. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were monitored before and after morning and evening treatment every 30 min for 48h by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). In dipper hypertension, the mean 48h BP was reduced with both doses. The decrease in the diurnal BP was stronger when the drug was administered in the evening than morning, but without significant difference. In nondipper hypertension, the systolic BP decreased at night with both doses, but the extent of the nocturnal reduction in systolic BP was greater after morning therapy. There were no significant differences in the decrease in BP during the day or night between the morning and evening administrations. When imidapril was administered in the morning, its serum concentration reached a maximum at 16:00, and when the drug was administered in the evening, it reached a maximum at 6:00. In dipper hypertension, the time taken for the blood concentration of imidapril to reach a maximum changed depending on its time of administration, and the time when the maximum antihypertensive effect of the drug appeared was different. In nondipper hypertension, decreases in the BP were confirmed at night regardless of the time of administration; this might be caused by angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors effectively blocking the BP from increasing by activating the parasympathetic nervous system. Therefore, when assessing the effectiveness of antihypertensive agents, factors such as the various patterns of BP before therapy and administration time must be considered. (Chronobiology International, 17(2), 209–219, 2000)     

Dose- and administration time-dependent effects of nifedipine gits on ambulatory blood pressure in hypertensive subjects

Previous chronotherapy studies have shown that the circadian pattern of blood pressure (BP) remains unchanged after either morning or evening dosing of several calcium channel blockers (CCB), including amlodipine, isradipine, verapamil, nitrendipine, and cilnidipine. This trial investigated the antihypertensive efficacy and safety profile of the slow-release, once-a-day nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) formulation administered at different times with reference to the rest-activity cycle of each participant. We studied 80 diurnally active subjects (36 men and 44 women), 52.1±10.7 yrs of age, with grade 1-2 essential hypertension, who were randomly assigned to receive nifedipine GITS (30 mg/day) as a monotherapy for eight weeks, either upon awakening in the morning or at bedtime at night. Patients with uncontrolled BP were up-titrated to a higher dose, 60 mg/day nifedipine GITS, for an additional eight weeks. BP was measured by ambulatory monitoring every 20 min during the day and every 30 min at night for 48 consecutive hours before and after therapy with either dose. The BP reduction after eight weeks of therapy with the lower dose of 30 mg/day was slightly, but not significantly, larger with bedtime dosing. The efficacy of 60 mg/day nifedipine GITS in non-responders to the initial 30 mg/day dose was twice as great with bedtime as compared to morning dosing. Moreover, bedtime administration of nifedipine GITS reduced the incidence of edema as an adverse event by 91%, and the total number of all adverse events by 74% as compared to morning dosing (p=0.026). Independent of the time of day of administration, a single daily dose of 30 mg/day of nifedipine GITS provides full 24 h therapeutic coverage. The dose-dependent increased efficacy and the markedly improved safety profile of bedtime as compared to morning administration of nifedipine GITS should be taken into account when prescribing this CCB in the treatment of essential hypertension.     

Dose‐ And Administration Time‐Dependent Effects Of Nifedipine Gits On Ambulatory Blood Pressure In Hypertensive Subjects

Previous chronotherapy studies have shown that the circadian pattern of blood pressure (BP) remains unchanged after either morning or evening dosing of several calcium channel blockers (CCB), including amlodipine, isradipine, verapamil, nitrendipine, and cilnidipine. This trial investigated the antihypertensive efficacy and safety profile of the slow‐release, once‐a‐day nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) formulation administered at different times with reference to the rest‐activity cycle of each participant. We studied 80 diurnally active subjects (36 men and 44 women), 52.1±10.7 yrs of age, with grade 1–2 essential hypertension, who were randomly assigned to receive nifedipine GITS (30 mg/day) as a monotherapy for eight weeks, either upon awakening in the morning or at bedtime at night. Patients with uncontrolled BP were up‐titrated to a higher dose, 60 mg/day nifedipine GITS, for an additional eight weeks. BP was measured by ambulatory monitoring every 20 min during the day and every 30 min at night for 48 consecutive hours before and after therapy with either dose. The BP reduction after eight weeks of therapy with the lower dose of 30 mg/day was slightly, but not significantly, larger with bedtime dosing. The efficacy of 60 mg/day nifedipine GITS in non‐responders to the initial 30 mg/day dose was twice as great with bedtime as compared to morning dosing. Moreover, bedtime administration of nifedipine GITS reduced the incidence of edema as an adverse event by 91%, and the total number of all adverse events by 74% as compared to morning dosing (p=0.026). Independent of the time of day of administration, a single daily dose of 30 mg/day of nifedipine GITS provides full 24 h therapeutic coverage. The dose‐dependent increased efficacy and the markedly improved safety profile of bedtime as compared to morning administration of nifedipine GITS should be taken into account when prescribing this CCB in the treatment of essential hypertension.     

Theophylline Dose-Concentration Relationship of a 12-Hourly Nuelin SA Regimen Supplemented with Nocturnal Nuelin Liquid in Healthy Volunteers

Twelve healthy male volunteers who were diurnally active between 05:00 and 23:00 took part in a randomized, multiple-dose, double-blind, four-way, crossover study to determine the relationship between the dose of a nonsus-tained-release theophylline (NSRT) formulation added to the evening administration of a 12-hourly sustained-release theophylline (SRT) regimen and the elevation of the early morning (between 02:00 and 05:00) steady-state plasma theophylline concentration. The four treatments were 250 mg Nuelin SA (sustained-release theophylline) every 12 h plus either placebo or Nuelin liquid (non-sustained-release theophylline) equivalent to 100 mg, 200 mg, or 300 mg of theophylline. Without evening supplementation (placebo), the early morning plasma theophylline concentrations were 13% lower than the average 24-h concentration. but with evening supplementation the early morning plasma theophylline concentration could be raised up to and above the average 24-h Concentration. A prediction equation for the early morning plasma theophylline concentration as a function of the additional evening dose of Nuelin liquid, and of the steady-state evening trough plasma theophylline concentration without evening supplementation, was established. This prediction equation can be used to determine the additional evening dose of Nuelin liquid (administered at 19:00) needed to reduce early morning bronchoconstriction in asthmatic patients who are on a 12-hourly Nuelin SA (drug administered at 07:00 and 19:00) regimen.     

Theophylline Dose-Concentration Relationship of a 12-Hourly Nuelin SA Regimen Supplemented with Nocturnal Nuelin Liquid in Healthy Volunteers

Twelve healthy male volunteers who were diurnally active between 05:00 and 23:00 took part in a randomized, multiple-dose, double-blind, four-way, crossover study to determine the relationship between the dose of a nonsus-tained-release theophylline (NSRT) formulation added to the evening administration of a 12-hourly sustained-release theophylline (SRT) regimen and the elevation of the early morning (between 02:00 and 05:00) steady-state plasma theophylline concentration. The four treatments were 250 mg Nuelin SA (sustained-release theophylline) every 12 h plus either placebo or Nuelin liquid (non-sustained-release theophylline) equivalent to 100 mg, 200 mg, or 300 mg of theophylline. Without evening supplementation (placebo), the early morning plasma theophylline concentrations were 13% lower than the average 24-h concentration. but with evening supplementation the early morning plasma theophylline concentration could be raised up to and above the average 24-h Concentration. A prediction equation for the early morning plasma theophylline concentration as a function of the additional evening dose of Nuelin liquid, and of the steady-state evening trough plasma theophylline concentration without evening supplementation, was established. This prediction equation can be used to determine the additional evening dose of Nuelin liquid (administered at 19:00) needed to reduce early morning bronchoconstriction in asthmatic patients who are on a 12-hourly Nuelin SA (drug administered at 07:00 and 19:00) regimen.     

ALTERATIONS WITH AGING OF THE ENDOCRINE AND NEUROENDOCRINE CIRCADIAN SYSTEM IN HUMANS

This was an open-label study in 19 children aged 9–13 years, weighing 27–44 kg, with bronchial asthma. Twenty-four-hour steady-state concentrations of theophylline and its metabolites 1,3-dimethyl uric acid, 3-methyl xanthine and 1-methyl uric acid were assessed after daily dosing of 600 mg (ca18 mg/kg/day) of the sustainedrelease theophylline micro-pellet sprinkle system BY158K, for 4 days. The dosing regimen used was an unequal twice-daily dose of 200 mg in the morning after breakfast and 400 mg in the evening after dinner. Twenty-four-hour peak expiratory flow (PEF) profiles were compared before treatment and at steady-state, along with lung function parameters after bronchial provocation. Mean values±SD (n=16) of the steady-state characteristics were C_min6.8±2.1 mg/1, C_max14.5±4.8 mg/1 and C_av10.S±2.9 mg/1, the plateau time was 11.7±4.8 hr and peak-trough fluctuation and swing were 72±21 and 118±52%, respectively. There was an excellent reproducibility of theophylline pre-dose levels at corresponding time points of the 24-hr sampling period [r=0.864 (p< 0.001)]. Mean values±SD of the 24 hr average serum metabolite levels were 0.9±0.2 mg/1 for 1, 3-dimethyl uric acid, 0.6±0.1 mg/1 for 3-methyl xanthine and 0.4±0.1 mg/1 for 1-methyl uric acid. Lung function (n=17) following bronchial provocation, improved in 10 children after theophylline treatment of 4 days, remained stable in 2 patients and deteriorated in 5 patients. Serum theophylline profiles and PEF profiles ran largely in parallel over the 24-hr period. Six children exhibited typical theophylline induced side-effects, headache (n=3), nausea (n=4), dizziness (n=l), vomiting (n=4), sleep disturbances (n=1), pallor (n=1) and tremor(n=1), necessitating in 3 children one dose omission/reduction (n=2) or subsequent dose reduction (n=1). It has been shown that a twice daily dosing regimen with unequal doses of anhydrous theophylline (BY158K) is well suited to this population of fast metabolisers. The patients were well protected throughout the day, including the critical early morning hours.