Complex nasal reconstruction

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Describe the goals of nasal reconstruction as they apply to extensive, complex defects that may also involve the adjacent lip or cheeks. 2. Understand the advantages and disadvantages of different options for reconstruction of lining, skeletal support, and skin cover. 3. Discuss current advances in complex nasal reconstruction, including microvascular reconstruction of lining and the three-stage forehead flap. 4. Understand the concepts of laminated and prelaminated flaps and their application in complex nasal defects. SUMMARY: In this article, the authors review methods of reconstructing complex, multilayered nasal defects that may involve surrounding central facial structures. Different means of lining, skeletal support, and skin cover reconstruction are discussed. Emphasis is placed on newer, state-of-the art techniques and reinforcing basic principles.     

A new twist to the nasolabial flap for reconstruction of lateral alar defects

The nasolabial flap remains the favored technique for alar and lateral nasal reconstruction. Results with currently popular techniques tend to be inartistic and aesthetically disappointing. Improved results can be achieved, however, by a technique using a medially based nasolabial turnover flap for lining with a distal extension providing the cover. Reconstruction of the ala begins by designing a nasolabial flap with its base as close as possible to the site of the proposed ala. The flap is incised to the required margins, carrying 2 to 3 mm of underlying fat; then, hinged on its base, the flap is flipped over medially like the page of a book. As the proximal flap is sutured to the lining side of the defect, the distal flap gracefully twists 90 degrees and is then folded on itself to form the external surface of the ala. The donor site is closed primarily. With this procedure, a natural-appearing and appropriately positioned ala may be reconstructed in one step, although a second procedure may be helpful to sculpture the margin or precisely position the alar base.     

A simple method for alar rim reconstruction

A one-stage repair procedure is described for the reconstruction of small to medium-sized full-thickness alar rim defects with a hinged medially based nasolabial island flap. The operation is performed under local anesthesia as an office procedure and is indicated particularly in older patients. The hinged flap provides both the inner and outer layers of the alar rim. The donor site is closed primarily with no need to mobilize a large skin flap. The procedure leaves no conspicuous scars on the face. This method was found to be simple and safe, providing excellent tissue viability and yielding good color and texture match.     

A comparative study of the skin envelope of the unilateral cleft lip nose subsequent to rotation-advancement and triangular flap lip repairs

The secondary nasal skin envelope asymmetries were studied after unilateral cleft lip repair using the original (obsolete) rotation-advancement (Millard I) and the triangular flap techniques (Bardach's modification). Secondary correction of the nasal deformity was not performed in either group. Our findings indicated that in both groups, vertical asymmetries of the nasal skin envelope were similar. The alar dome on the cleft side was depressed, the columella was shorter on the cleft side, and there was hooding at the nostril apex. The principal difference between the two lip repairs was observed in the horizontal dimension of the nasal skin envelope. The position of the alar base was more normal following the Millard I repair, while the triangular flap repair left the alar base laterally displaced. When considered together with flattening of the cleft alar dome, a horizontal skin-envelope deficiency from middome to lateral alar crease was produced in the Millard I group. More lateral positioning of the alar base after the triangular flap technique minimized this horizontal skin deficiency. The triangular flap technique produced a secondary nasal deformity that looked worse but was easier to correct. The clinical implications of these findings are discussed.     

Reconstruction of large nasal defects with a combination of local flaps based on the aesthetic subunit principle

Herein is described a technique that uses a combination of local flaps to reconstruct large defects involving the nasal dorsum and cheek. The flaps used are a transposition flap elevated from the area adjoining the defect and bilateral cheek advancement flaps. This technique leaves all suture wounds at borders of the aesthetic subunits that have been described previously. Color and texture matches were good and symmetrical. The transposition flap can be modified according to whether the defect includes the nasal tip. After raising the cheek advancement flap, it is also possible to use a dog-ear on the nasolabial region for any alar defects. Nine patients were treated using this procedure. The technique is very reliable (no complications such as congestion and skin necrosis in our series) and is easy to perform. One patient had palpebral ectropion after the operation and underwent secondary repair. In this series, defects measuring 45 x 30 mm in maximum diameter and including the nasal dorsum, nasal tip, ala, and cheek were treated.     

Bilateral cleft lip reconstruction

Over a period of 8 years 140 bilateral cleft lips were operated using a muscle-repositioning banked fork-flap cheiloplasty. The use of buccal mucosal flaps in the intercartilaginous incision is helpful to decrease scarring and contracture by facilitating alar cartilage repositioning and wound closure without tension. Adding mucosa from the inferior turbinate makes complete wound closure relatively easy without tension. A lateral lip orbicularis muscle flap with white skin roll and vermilion is recommended for reconstruction of the Cupid's bow. Muscle continuity by freeing the muscle in one sheet and repositioning in front of the premaxilla with creation of a buccal alveolar sulcus is stressed to prevent the necessity of reentering the lip in a second procedure. The elongation of the columella is done at 1 to 6 years of age by advancing nasal floor tissue onto the columella and repositioning the alar cartilages superiorly and medially. When nasal floor tissue is inadequate, columellar lengthening is done by the use of a composite free ear graft.     

Nasal reconstruction based on aesthetic subunits in Orientals

Reconstruction based on the aesthetic subunit principle has yielded good aesthetic outcomes in patients with moderate to severe nasal defects caused by trauma or tumor resection. However, the topographic subunits previously proposed are often unsuitable for Orientals. Compared with the nose in white patients, the nose in Orientals is low, lacks nasal muscle, and has a flat glabella; the structural features of the underlying cartilage and bone are not distinctly reflected in outward appearance. The authors devised aesthetic subunits suitable for Orientals, and they used these units to reconstruct various parts of the nose. The major difference between these units and those presented previously is the lack of soft triangles and the addition of the glabella as an independent unit. The authors divided the nose into the following five topographic units: the glabella, the nasal dorsum, the nasal tip, and the two alae. The border of the nasal dorsum unit was extended to above the maxillonasal suture. The basic reconstruction techniques use a V-Y advancement flap from the forehead to reconstruct the glabella, an island flap from the forehead to reconstruct the nasal dorsum and nasal tip, a nasolabial flap to reconstruct an ala, and a malar flap to reconstruct the cheek. A combination of flaps was used when the defect involved more than one unit. This concept was used for nasal reconstruction in 24 patients. In one patient undergoing reconstruction of the nasal dorsum and in one undergoing reconstruction of the nasal tip, the texture of the forearm flap did not match well, which resulted in a slightly unsatisfactory aesthetic outcome. In one patient in whom the glabella, nasal dorsum, and part of the cheek were reconstructed simultaneously, a web was formed at the medial ocular angle, and a secondary operation was subsequently performed using Z-plasty. In one patient undergoing reconstruction with a forehead flap, defatting was required to reduce the bulk of the subcutaneous flap pedicle at the glabella. However, suture lines were placed in the most inconspicuous sites in all patients, and the use of a trapdoor contraction emphasized the three-dimensional appearance of the nose. The use of these aesthetic subunits for reconstruction offers several advantages, particularly in Oriental patients. Because the nasal dorsum is reconstructed together with the side walls, tenting of the nasal dorsum is avoided, which prevents a flat appearance of the nose. A forehead flap is useful in the repair of complex defects. Defects of the alae should be separately reconstructed with a nasolabial flap to enhance the effect of the trapdoor contraction and to highlight the three-dimensional appearance of the nose. Candidates for reconstruction should be selected on the basis of nasal structure. The results suggest that these units can also be used in some white patients.     

A rational approach to nasal reconstruction in leprosy

Destruction of the nasal septum and nasal bones by Mycobacterium leprae and subsequent infection is still seen regularly in leprosy endemic areas. The social stigma associated with this deformity is significant. Many different procedures have been developed to reconstruct the nose. Patients operated on at Anandaban Hospital and the Green Pastures Hospital and Rehabilitation Center between 1986 and 2001 were reviewed. There were 48 patients with an average age of 47 years. Five deformities were mild, 22 were moderate, 13 were severe, and eight were not graded. Bone grafting with nasolabial skin flaps was performed in 14 cases, bone grafting alone was performed in 10 cases, flaps alone were performed in seven cases, and cartilage grafting was performed in 10 cases. In three patients, a prosthesis was inserted, and in three patients a gull-wing forehead flap was performed. Overall, excellent or good cosmetic results were obtained in 83 percent of cases. Grafting with conchal cartilage was associated with the best cosmetic results and had minimal complications. Bone grafting with or without nasolabial flaps was associated with a 50 percent complication rate of infection or graft resorption. In mild to moderate deformities, cartilage grafting is recommended; for more severe deformities, bone grafting with bony fixation and skin flaps is recommended. Perioperative antibiotics must be used, and these procedures should be performed by an experienced surgeon. In very severe cases with skin deficiency, reconstruction with a forehead flap gives good results.     

Aesthetic considerations in nasal reconstruction and the role of modified nasal subunits

In 1985, Burget and Menick's landmark article on the nasal subunit principle popularized the technique of reconstructing the specific topographic subunits that they identified as the dorsum, tip, and columella and the paired alae, sidewalls, and soft triangles. In patients with more than 50 percent of subunit loss, Burget and Menick proposed removing the remaining portion of the subunit and reconstructing the entire subunit with a skin graft or flap. They further supported the placement of incisions for local flaps along borders of aesthetic subunits to maximize scar camouflage. Although the concept of nasal subunits is important in planning the reconstruction, other aesthetic considerations, such as skin texture, color, contour, and actinic damage, are also crucial in achieving an optimal result. Often, focusing on these aspects with the goal of nasal symmetry in mind leads to the violation of the subunit principle but provides a pleasing result of both the defect and the donor site. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate when and how the modification of the nasal subunit principle is used to achieve coverage of nasal skin defects. A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent nasal reconstruction after skin cancer ablation surgery by one surgeon at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania from 1987 to 2000 was performed. During this 13-year period, 219 patients underwent 245 nasal reconstructions. Seventy-four patients with 76 reconstructions (31 percent) had procedures that violated the classic nasal subunit principle. Eight of these 74 patients (11 percent) had complications, and eight (11 percent) had 10 revisions performed. The aesthetic and functional results were graded as excellent, good, and fair. The results for the 74 patients who underwent modification of the subunit were excellent in 85 percent, good in 13 percent, and fair in 2 percent. Case reports were selected to illustrate situations in which the nasal subunit was altered.     

Reconstruction of both eyelids following electrical burn

A case of severe electrical burn of the unilateral upper and lower eyelids is reported, together with the surgical technique of reconstruction. A 25-year-old man suffered an electrical burn on his left eyelids. On admission, his left upper and lower eyelids were subtotally necrotic. Total eyelid reconstruction was performed 2 1/2 months later. A chondromucosal graft taken from the nasal septum was utilized as the deep layer of the upper eyelid, which was covered by sliding down the remaining levator muscle and connective tissues to maintain the blood supply to the composite graft. The outer layer of the upper lid was reconstructed with a free split-thickness skin graft. The lower lid was reconstructed with a local flap lined with a free mucosal graft. This sandwich method using the levator muscle as a core was found useful for reconstructing both the upper and lower eyelids.     

An evaluation of hard palate mucosa graft as a lining material in alar reconstruction: a 7-year experience applied to the full-thickness alar defect

The authors present their experience with 25 hard palate mucosa grafts used as lining material in the reconstruction of full-thickness alar defects. Good "take" was obtained in 22 grafts; the other three grafts incurred necrosis of the overriding skin flaps and postoperative infection. Degree of shrinkage was 11 to 15 percent of grafted size in patients with the type of defect that did not include the alar margin; shrinkage was 26 to 35 percent in patients with the type that included more than 50 percent of the alar margin. In all patients who had a good graft take, the nasal cavities were maintained and there was no nasal obstruction or collapsing during strong breathing. The healing time of the palate donor site varied from 7 days to 5 weeks, depending on the size of the defect. No patients experienced any symptoms at the donor site after healing. The authors concluded that hard palate mucosa can be considered a useful material in alar reconstruction because of the ease in graft harvesting and its support features. When the defect is large enough to involve the total unilateral ala nasi, even though the degree of postoperative shrinkage is comparatively high, hard palate mucosa may be the most suitable material to ensure good take of the graft and less possibility of donor-site morbidity.     

Simultaneous reconstruction of the secondary bilateral cleft lip and nasal deformity: Abbé flap revisited

The purpose of this retrospective study was to review the method of using the Abbé flap for correction of secondary bilateral cleft lip deformity in selected patients with tight upper lip, short prolabium, lack of acceptable philtral column and Cupid's bow definition, central vermilion deficiency, irregular lip scars, and associated nasal deformity. A total of 39 patients with the bilateral cleft lip nasal deformity received Abbé flap and simultaneous nasal reconstruction during a period of 6 years. Mean patient age at the time of the operation was 19.1 years, and ranged from 6.6 to 38.5 years. The average follow-up period was 1.8 years. Fourteen patients had prior orthognathic operations. The Abbé flap was designed 13 to 14 mm in length and 8 to 9 mm in width and contained full-thickness tissue from the central lower lip, with a slightly narrow reverse-V caudal end. The prolabium, including the scars and central vermilion, was excised. Lengthening procedures of the upper lip segments were performed if vertical deficiency existed. Part of the prolabial skin was preserved and mobilized for columellar elongation, if indicated. Open rhinoplasty was carried out with or without cartilage graft for columella and nasal tip reconstruction. Reduction of the alar width and nostrils was achieved by a Z-plasty or excision of scar tissue at the nostril floor. The Abbé flap was then transposed cephalad, insetting into the median defect and sutured in layers. The results demonstrated no flap problems or perioperative complications. Seven patients needed further minor revisions on the nose and/or lip. Laser treatment was used to improve the lip scars in three patients. The patients were satisfied with the final outcome and found the lower lip scars acceptable. In conclusion, the described technique of Abbé flap and simultaneous rhinoplasty is an effective reconstructive method for select patients with bilateral cleft lip and nasal deformity.     

Nasal reconstruction with the expanded forehead flap

This report details the experience with nine patients over a 3-year period who had partial or total nasal reconstruction using an expanded forehead flap. The history of nasal reconstruction is reviewed, emphasizing the evolution of the forehead flap as the ideal donor site. The author's experience with skin expansion of the forehead to produce a thin ideal flap is presented in detail. Complications of the procedure are reviewed. Technical considerations to achieve a good result are emphasized. The forehead donor site is minimal and well accepted. This procedure provides a solution to a major problem with partial and total nasal reconstruction.     

Anatomic reconstruction of the nasal tip cartilages in secondary and reconstructive rhinoplasty

Most techniques for secondary rhinoplasty assume that useful residual remnants of the tip cartilages remain, but frequently the alar cartilages are missing--unilaterally, bilaterally, completely, or incompletely--with loss of the lateral crura, middle crura, and parts of the medial crura. In such severe cases, excision of scar tissue and the residual alar remnants and their replacement with nonanatomic tip grafts have been recommended. Multiple solid, bruised, or crushed cartilage fragments are positioned in a closed pocket or solid shield-shaped grafts are fixed with sutures during an open rhinoplasty. These onlay filler grafts only increase tip projection and definition. Associated tip abnormalities (alar rim notching, columellar retraction, nostril distortion) are not addressed. Problems with graft visibility, an unnatural appearance, or malposition have been noted. Fortunately, techniques useful in reconstructive rhinoplasty can be applied to severe cosmetic secondary deformities. Anatomic cartilage replacements similar in shape, bulk, and position to normal alar cartilages can be fashioned from septal, ear, and rib cartilage, fixed to the residual medial crura and/or a columellar strut, and bent backward to restore the normal skeletal framework of the tip. During an open rhinoplasty, a fabricated and rigid framework is designed to replace the missing medial, middle, or lateral crus of one or both alar cartilages. The entire alar tripod is recreated. These anatomic alar cartilage reconstructive grafts create tip definition and projection, fill the lobule and restore the expected lateral convexity, position the columella and establish columellar length, secure and position the alar rim, and brace the external valve against collapse, support the vestibular lining, and restore a nostril shape. The anatomic form and function of the nasal tip is restored. This technique is recommended when alar cartilages are significantly destroyed or absent in secondary or reconstructive rhinoplasty and the alar remnants are insufficient for repair. Anatomically designed alar cartilage replacements allow an aesthetically structured skeleton to contour the overlying skin envelope. Problems with displacement are minimized by graft fixation. Graft visibility is used to the surgeon's advantage. A rigidly supported framework with a nasal shape can mold a covering forehead flap or the scarred tip skin of a secondary rhinoplasty and create a result that may approach normal. Anatomic alar cartilage reconstructions were used in eight reconstructive and eight secondary rhinoplasties in the last 5 years. Their use in the repair of postrhinoplasty deformities is emphasized.     

Primary correction of the unilateral cleft lip nose: a 15-year experience

This paper reviews a 15-year personal experience based on 400 unilateral cleft nasal deformities that were reconstructed using a method that repositions the alar cartilage by freeing it from the skin and lining and shifts it to a new position. The rotation-advancement lip procedure facilitates the exposure and approach to the nasal reconstruction. The nasal soft tissues are transected from the skeletal base, reshaped, repositioned, and secured by using temporary stent sutures that readapt the alar cartilage, skin, and lining. The nasal floor is closed and the ala base is positioned to match the normal side. Good subsequent growth with maintenance of the reconstruction has been noted in this series. The repair does not directly expose or suture the alar cartilage. Improvement in the cleft nasal deformity is noted in 80 percent of the cases. Twenty percent require additional techniques to achieve the desired symmetry. This method has been used by the author as his primary unilateral cleft nasal repair and has been taught to residents and fellows under his direction with good results. This technique eliminates the severe cleft nasal deformity seen in many secondary cases.     

The residual unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity: a three-phase correction technique

The author presents a three-phase correction technique for the residual unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity. This procedure involves a sculpting excision of the alar rim, use of this alar rim as an interpositional flap in lengthening the columella, and augmentation of the nasal tip and perialar sulcus with a free ear conchal cartilage graft. The concept has been incorporated in the revisionary surgery program of 74 patients over a period of 5 years with a minimal follow-up of 2 years. The majority of the patients are operated on between the ages of 5 and 7 years based on the concept of a need for a "tidy appearance" by first grade.     

Indications and use of composite grafts in 100 consecutive secondary and tertiary rhinoplasty patients: introduction of the axial orientation

The fragile alar rims are complex structures whose specialized and supportive skin ensures the competence of the external valves and the patency of the inlets to the nasal airways. A chart review was performed of 100 consecutive secondary or tertiary rhinoplasty patients in whom the author had placed composite grafts before February 1999. Follow-up continued for at least 12 months. In 94 percent of the patients, composite grafts were harvested from the cymba conchae by removing the cartilage with its adherent anterior skin. In 6 percent of the patients, independently indicated alar wedges supplied the grafts. Six patients required secondary procedures to thin the alar rims, but such revisions have not been necessary since primary contouring of the cartilaginous graft component was instituted. Three auricular donor-site complications (one keloid, two thickened graft contours) were successfully revised through office procedures. Prior cosmetic rhinoplasty in a patient with normal alar cartilage anatomy exceeded all other etiologies as the cause of the deformity for which composite grafts were indicated (50 percent). The second most common etiology was deformity from prior rhinoplasty in a patient with alar cartilage malposition (33 percent of patients). Congenital deformities (7 percent of patients), trauma (6 percent), and prior tumor ablation (4 percent) comprised the remaining etiologies. Composite grafts were used most frequently to correct alar notching or asymmetry in rim height (43 percent of patients) or to provide an increase in apparent or real nasal length (28 percent). External valvular incompetence (14 percent of patients), nostril or vestibular stenosis (11 percent), or combined vestibular stenosis and lateral alar wall collapse (4 percent) were less common indications. Most composite grafts were oriented in the coronal plane (parallel to the alar rims). However, nostril or vestibular stenosis was corrected by sagittally placed composite grafts, and a third orientation (axial plane), to the author's knowledge not described previously, was used in patients with combined nostril stenoses and flattening of the alar walls. In this secondary rhinoplasty series, iatrogenic alar rim deformities or stenoses following cosmetic rhinoplasty dominated other causes requiring composite graft reconstruction (83 percent of patients). Of these 83 patients, 39.7 percent had preexisting alar cartilage malpositions, further supporting the importance of making accurate anatomical diagnosis part of every preoperative rhinoplasty plan.     

Primary repair of the unilateral cleft lip nose in the Oriental: a 20-year follow-up

The unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity is corrected as a primary procedure with the lip repair. The abnormal attachment of the alar base is first released by an incision along the superior buccal sulcus and piriform margin. There is no intercartilaginous incision. Basically, we use the Brown-McDowell technique with the addition of an alar rim incision. Undermining of the ala between the two incisions is carefully and adequately done, splitting it into two layers. The first is a skin and the second, a chondrocutaneous (vestibular skin) layer, which is handled as a single unit, thus enhancing its vascularity. This second layer is a bipedicle flap with a broad medial pedicle and a narrow lateral pedicle at the alar base. When the alar base is rolled into its normal position, the chondrocutaneous unit hinging on its two pedicles counterrotates, correcting the subluxation of the ala, a major component of the cleft lip nasal deformity. We depend on the normal position of the alar base, the postoperative scar tissue, and the inherently thick nostril wall in the Oriental to keep the alar dome up. No transfixion sutures are used. Ten consecutive patients are shown 20 years after surgery. All had one operation only. None showed any disturbance of nasal growth.     

Breast reconstruction with free-tissue transfer

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the rationale for the use of free tissue transfer for breast reconstruction. 2. Understand the indications, advantages, and disadvantages of this method of reconstruction.The authors discuss the indications, advantages, and disadvantages of free-tissue transfer for breast reconstruction. The most common free flaps used today are individually discussed. Details about indications, contraindications, pertinent anatomy, pedicle characteristics, flap pliability, perfusion characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages for each of these flaps are presented. Details pertaining to the more common recipient vessels are presented. Future considerations are also briefly discussed.