Interaction of oxidized chaperonin GroEL with an unfolded protein at low temperatures

The chaperonin GroEL binds to non-native substrate proteins via hydrophobic interactions, preventing their aggregation, which is minimized at low temperatures. In the present study, we investigated the refolding of urea-denatured rhodanese at low temperatures, in the presence of ox-GroEL (oxidized GroEL), which contains increased exposed hydrophobic surfaces and retains its ability to hydrolyse ATP. We found that ox-GroEL could efficiently bind the urea-unfolded rhodanese at 4°C, without requiring excess amount of chaperonin relative to normal GroEL (i.e. non-oxidized). The release/reactivation of rhodanese from GroEL was minimal at 4°C, but was found to be optimal between 22 and 37°C. It was found that the loss of the ATPase activity of ox-GroEL at 4°C prevented the release of rhodanese from the GroEL-rhodanese complex. Thus ox-GroEL has the potential to efficiently trap recombinant or non-native proteins at 4°C and release them at higher temperatures under appropriate conditions.     

On the chaperonin activity of GroEL at heat-shock temperature

The studies of GroEL, almost exclusively, have been concerned with the function of the chaperonin under non-stress conditions, and little is known about the role of GroEL during heat shock. Being a heat shock protein, GroEL deserves to be studied under heat shock temperature. As a model for heat shock in vitro, we have investigated the interaction of GroEL with the enzyme rhodanese undergoing thermal unfolding at 43 degrees C. GroEL interacted strongly with the unfolding enzyme forming a binary complex. Active rhodanese (82%) could be recovered by releasing the enzyme from GroEL after the addition of several components, e.g. ATP and the co-chaperonin GroES. After evaluating the stability of the GroEL-rhodanese complex, as a function of the percentage of active rhodanese that could be released from GroEL with time, we found that the complex had a half-life of only one and half-hours at 43 degrees C; while, it remained stable at 25 degrees C for more than 2 weeks. Interestingly, the GroEL-rhodanese complex remained intact and only 13% of its ATPase activity was lost during its incubation at 43 degrees C. Further, rhodanese underwent a conformational change over time while it was bound to GroEL at 43 degrees C. Overall, our results indicated that the inability to recover active enzyme at 43 degrees C from the GroEL-rhodanese complex was not due to the disruption of the complex or aggregation of rhodanese, but rather to the partial loss of its ATPase activity and/or to the inability of rhodanese to be released from GroEL due to a conformational change.     

GroEL-substrate-GroES ternary complexes are an important transient intermediate of the chaperonin cycle

GroEL C138W is a mutant form of Escherichia coli GroEL, which forms an arrested ternary complex composed of GroEL, the co-chaperonin GroES and the refolding protein molecule rhodanese at 25 degrees C. This state of arrest could be reversed with a simple increase in temperature. In this study, we found that GroEL C138W formed both stable trans- and cis-ternary complexes with a number of refolding proteins in addition to bovine rhodanese. These complexes could be reactivated by a temperature shift to obtain active refolded protein. The simultaneous binding of GroES and substrate to the cis ring suggested that an efficient transfer of substrate protein into the GroEL central cavity was assured by the binding of GroES prior to complete substrate release from the apical domain. Stopped-flow fluorescence spectroscopy of the mutant chaperonin revealed a temperature-dependent conformational change in GroEL C138W that acts as a trigger for complete protein release. The behavior of GroEL C138W was reflected closely in its in vivo characteristics, demonstrating the importance of this conformational change to the overall activity of GroEL.     

A comparison of the GroE chaperonin requirements for sequentially and structurally homologous malate dehydrogenases: the importance of folding kinetics and solution environment

Escherichia coli malate dehydrogenase (EcMDH) and its eukaryotic counterpart, porcine mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase (PmMDH), are highly homologous proteins with significant sequence identity (60%) and virtually identical native structural folds. Despite this homology, EcMDH folds rapidly and efficiently in vitro and does not seem to interact with GroE chaperonins at physiological temperatures (37 degrees C), whereas PmMDH folds much slower than EcMDH and requires these chaperonins to fold to the native state at 37 degrees C. Double jump experiments indicate that the slow folding behavior of PmMDH is not limited by proline isomerization. Although the folding enhancer glycerol (<5 m) does not alter the renaturation kinetics of EcMDH, it dramatically accelerates the spontaneous renaturation of PmMDH at all temperatures tested. Kinetic analysis of PmMDH renaturation with increasing glycerol concentrations suggests that this osmolyte increases the on-pathway kinetics of the monomer folding to assembly-competent forms. Other osmolytes such as trimethylamine N-oxide, sucrose, and betaine also reactivate PmMDH at nonpermissive temperatures (37 degrees C). Glycerol jump experiments with preformed GroEL.PmMDH complexes indicate that the shift between stringent (requires ATP and GroES) and relaxed (only requires ATP) complex conformations is rapid (<3-5 s). The similarity in irreversible misfolding kinetics of PmMDH measured with glycerol or the activated chaperonin complex (GroEL.GroES.ATP) suggests that these folding aids may influence the same step in the PmMDH folding reaction. Moreover, the interactions between glycerol-induced PmMDH folding intermediates and GroEL.GroES.ATP are diminished. Our results support the notion that the protein folding kinetics of sequentially and structurally homologous proteins, rather than the structural fold, dictates the GroE chaperonin requirement.     

Intermediates in the chaperonin-assisted refolding of rhodanese are trapped at low temperature and show a small stoichiometry.

In vitro refolding of the urea-unfolded, monomeric, mitochondrial enzyme rhodanese (thiosulfate sulfur-transferase; EC 2.8.1.1) is facilitated by the chaperonin proteins cpn60 and cpn10 from Escherichia coli at 37 degrees C, but the refolding is strongly inhibited at 10 degrees C. In contrast, the unassisted refolding of rhodanese is efficient at 10 degrees C, but the refolding efficiency decreases as the temperature is raised. These observations provided two measures of the cpn60-rhodanese complex. Thus, we monitored either 1) the cpn60-dependent inhibition of spontaneous folding at 10 degrees C or 2) the recovery of active rhodanese in the complete chaperonin system at 25 degrees C, after first forming a cpn60-rhodanese complex at 10 degrees C. These procedures minimized the aggregation of interactive folding intermediates that tend to overestimate the apparent number of cpn60 14-mers in determining the stoichiometry of protein-cpn60 14-mer interactions. Both procedures used here gave results that were consistent with there being 1 rhodanese binding site/cpn60 tetradecamer. This stoichiometry is significantly less than might be expected from the fact that cpn60 is composed of 14 identical subunits, and it may indicate that rhodanese interacts with a restricted region that is formed when the cpn60 tetradecamer is assembled. The ability to stabilize chaperonin-protein complexes that can subsequently be reactivated will aid studies of the mode of action of the ubiquitous chaperonin proteins.     

Hydrogen peroxide induces the dissociation of GroEL into monomers that can facilitate the reactivation of oxidatively inactivated rhodanese

Although, several studies have been reported on the effects of oxidants on the structure and function of other molecular chaperones, no reports have been made so far for the chaperonin GroEL. The ability of GroEL to function under oxidative stress was investigated in this report by monitoring the effects of hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) on the structure and refolding activity of this protein. Using fluorescence spectroscopy and light scattering, we observed that GroEL showed increases in exposed hydrophobic sites and changes in tertiary and quaternary structure. Differential sedimentation, gel electrophoresis, and circular dichroism showed that H(2)O(2) treated GroEL underwent irreversible dissociation into monomers with partial loss of secondary structure. Relative to other proteins, GroEL was found to be highly resistant to oxidative damage. Interestingly, GroEL monomers produced under these conditions can facilitate the reactivation of H(2)O(2)-inactivated rhodanese but not urea-denatured rhodanese. Recovery of approximately 84% active rhodanese was obtained with either native or oxidized GroEL in the absence of GroES or ATP. In comparison, urea-denatured GroEL, BSA and the refolding mixture in the absence of proteins resulted in the recovery of 72, 50, and 49% rhodanese activity, respectively. Previous studies have shown that GroEL monomers can reactivate rhodanese. Here, we show that oxidized monomeric GroEL can reactivate oxidized rhodanese suggesting that GroEL retains the ability to protect proteins during oxidative stress.     

Discrimination of ATP,ADP, and AMPPNP by chaperonin GroEL: hexokinase treatment revealed the exclusive role of ATP

The double ring chaperonin GroEL binds unfolded protein, ATP, and GroES to the same ring, generating the cis ternary complex in which folding occurs within the cavity capped by GroES (cis folding). The functional role of ATP, however, remains unclear since several reports have indicated that ADP and AMPPNP (5'-adenylyl-beta,gamma-imidodiphosphate) are also able to support the formation of the cis ternary complex and the cis folding. To minimize the effect of contaminated ATP and adenylate kinase, we have included hexokinase plus glucose in the reaction mixtures and obtained new results. In ADP and AMPPNP, GroES bound quickly to GroEL but bound very slowly to the GroEL loaded with unfolded rhodanese or malate dehydrogenase. ADP was unable to support the formation of cis ternary complex and cis folding. AMPPNP supported cis folding of malate dehydrogenase to some extent but not cis folding of rhodanese. In the absence of hexokinase, apparent cis folding of rhodanese and malate dehydrogenase was observed in ADP and AMPPNP. Thus, the exclusive role of ATP in generation of the cis ternary complex is now evident.     

Mechanism of chaperonin action: GroES binding and release can drive GroEL-mediated protein folding in the absence of ATP hydrolysis.

As a basic principle, assisted protein folding by GroEL has been proposed to involve the disruption of misfolded protein structures through ATP hydrolysis and interaction with the cofactor GroES. Here, we describe chaperonin subreactions that prompt a re-examination of this view. We find that GroEL-bound substrate polypeptide can induce GroES cycling on and off GroEL in the presence of ADP. This mechanism promotes efficient folding of the model protein rhodanese, although at a slower rate than in the presence of ATP. Folding occurs when GroES displaces the bound protein into the sequestered volume of the GroEL cavity. Resulting native protein leaves GroEL upon GroES release. A single-ring variant of GroEL is also fully functional in supporting this reaction cycle. We conclude that neither the energy of ATP hydrolysis nor the allosteric coupling of the two GroEL rings is directly required for GroEL/GroES-mediated protein folding. The minimal mechanism of the reaction is the binding and release of GroES to a polypeptide-containing ring of GroEL, thereby closing and opening the GroEL folding cage. The role of ATP hydrolysis is mainly to induce conformational changes in GroEL that result in GroES cycling at a physiologically relevant rate.     

Chaperonin cpn60 from Escherichia coli protects the mitochondrial enzyme rhodanese against heat inactivation and supports folding at elevated temperatures.

The chaperonin protein cpn60 from Escherichia coli protects the monomeric, mitochondrial enzyme rhodanese (thiosulfate:cyanide sulfurtransferase, EC 2.8.1.1) against heat inactivation. The thermal inactivation of rhodanese was studied for four different states of the enzyme: native, refolded, bound to cpn60 in the form of a binary complex formed from unfolded rhodanese, and a thermally perturbed state. Thermal stabilization is observed in a range of temperatures from 25 to 48 degrees C. Rhodanese that had been inactivated by incubation at 48 degrees C, in the presence of cpn60 can be reactivated at 25 degrees C, upon addition of cpn10, K+, and MgATP. A recovery of about 80% was achieved after 1 h of the addition of those components. Thus, the enzyme is protected against heat inactivation and kept in a reactivable form if inactivation is attempted using the binary complex formed between rhodanese folding intermediate(s) and cpn60. The chaperonin-assisted refolding of urea-denatured rhodanese is dependent on the temperature of the refolding reaction. However, optimal chaperonin assisted refolding of rhodanese observed at 25 degrees C, which is achieved upon addition of cpn10 and ATP to the cpn60-rhodanese complex, is independent of the temperature of preincubation of the complex, that was formed previously at low temperature. The results are in agreement with a model in which the chaperonin cpn60 interacts with partly folded intermediates by forming a binary complex which is stable to elevated temperatures. In addition, it appears that native rhodanese can be thermally perturbed to produce a state different from that achieved by denaturation that can interact with cpn60.     

Role of Denatured-State Properties in Chaperonin Action Probed by Single-Molecule Spectroscopy

The bacterial chaperonin GroEL/GroES assists folding of a broad spectrum of denatured and misfolded proteins. Here, we explore the limits of this remarkable promiscuity by mapping two denatured proteins with very different conformational properties, rhodanese and cyclophilin A, during binding and encapsulation by GroEL/GroES with single-molecule spectroscopy, microfluidic mixing, and ensemble kinetics. We find that both proteins bind to GroEL with high affinity in a reaction involving substantial conformational adaptation. However, whereas the compact denatured state of rhodanese is encapsulated efficiently upon addition of GroES and ATP, the more expanded and unstructured denatured cyclophilin A is not encapsulated but is expelled into solution. The origin of this surprising disparity is the weaker interactions of cyclophilin A with a transiently formed GroEL-GroES complex, which may serve as a crucial checkpoint for substrate discrimination.     

Isolation and characterization of rhodanese intermediates during thermal inactivation and their implications for the mechanism of protein aggregation

The initial steps of heat-induced inactivation and aggregation of the enzyme rhodanese have been studied and found to involve the early formation of modified but catalytically active conformations. These intermediates readily form active dimers or small oligomers, as evident from there being only a small increase in light scattering and an increase in fluorescence energy homotransfer from rhodanese labeled with fluorescein. These species are probably not the domain-unfolded form, as they show activity and increased protection of hydrophobic surfaces. Cross-linking with glutaraldehyde and fractionation by gel filtration show the predominant formation of dimer during heat incubation. Comparison between the rates of aggregate formation at 50 degrees C after preincubation at 25 or 40 degrees C gives evidence of product-precursor relationships, and it shows that these dimeric or small oligomeric species are the basis of the irreversible aggregation. The thermally induced species is recognized by and binds to the chaperonin GroEL. The unfoldase activity of GroEL subsequently unfolds rhodanese to produce an inactive conformation and forms a stable, reactivable complex. The release of 80% active rhodanese upon addition of GroES and ATP indicates that the thermal incubation induces an alteration in conformation, rather than any covalent modification, which would lead to formation of irreversibly inactive species. Once oligomeric species are formed from the intermediates, GroEL cannot recognize them. Based on these observations, a model is proposed for rhodanese aggregation that can explain the paradoxical effect in which rhodanese aggregation is reduced at higher protein concentration.     

Purification and characterization of the GroESLx chaperonins from the symbiotic X-bacteria in Amoeba proteus.

GroELx and GroESx proteins of symbiotic X-bacteria from Amoeba proteus were overproduced in Escherichia coli transformed with pAJX91 and pUXGPRM, respectively, and their chaperonin functions were assayed. We utilized sigma(70)-dependent specific promoters of groEx in the expression vectors and grew recombinant cells at 37 degrees C to minimize coexpression of host groE of E. coli. For purifying the proteins, we applied the principle of heat stability for GroELx and pI difference for GroESx to minimize copurification with the hosts GroEL and GroES, respectively. After ultracentrifugation in a sucrose density gradient, the yield and purity of GroELx were 56 and 89%, respectively. The yield and purity of GroESx after anion-exchange chromatography were 62 and 91%, respectively. Purified GroELx had an ATPase activity of 53.2 nmol Pi released/min/mg protein at 37 degrees C. The GroESx protein inhibited ATPase activity of GroELx to 60% of the control at a ratio of 1 for GroESx-7mer/GroELx-14mer. GroESLx helped refolding of urea-unfolded rhodanese up to 80% of the native activity at 37 degrees C. By chemical cross-linking analysis, oligomeric properties of GroESx and GroELx were confirmed as GroESx(7) and GroELx(14) in two stacks of GroELx(7). In this study, we developed a method for the purification of GroESLx and demonstrated that their chaperonin function is homologous to GroESL of E. coli.     

Salt bridges at the inter-ring interface regulate the thermostat of GroEL

The chaperonin GroEL consists of a double-ring structure made of identical subunits and displays unusual allosteric properties caused by the interaction between its constituent subunits. Cooperative binding of ATP to a protein ring allows binding of GroES to that ring, and at the same time negative inter-ring cooperativity discharges the ligands from the opposite ring, thus driving the protein-folding cycle. Biochemical and electron microscopy analysis of wild type GroEL, a single-ring mutant (SR1), and two mutants with one inter-ring salt bridge of the chaperonin disrupted (E461K and E434K) indicate that these ion pairs form part of the interactions that allow the inter-ring allosteric signal to be transmitted. The wild type-like activities of the ion pair mutants at 25 degrees C are in contrast with their lack of inter-ring communication and folding activity at physiological temperatures. These salt bridges stabilize the inter-ring interface and maintain the inter-ring spacing so that functional communication between protein heptamers takes place. The characterization of GroEL hybrids containing different amounts of wild type and mutant subunits also indicates that as the number of inter-ring salt bridges increases the functional properties of the hybrids recover. Taken together, these results strongly suggest that inter-ring salt bridges form a stabilizing ring-shaped, ionic zipper that ensures inter-ring communication at the contact sites and therefore a functional protein-folding cycle. Furthermore, they regulate the chaperonin thermostat, allowing GroEL to distinguish physiological (37 degrees C) from stress temperatures (42 degrees C).     

Co-expression of chaperonin GroEL/GroES enhances in vivo folding of yeast mitochondrial aconitase and alters the growth characteristics of Escherichia coli

Over last two decades many researchers have demonstrated the mechanisms of how the Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL and GroES work in the binding and folding of different aggregation prone substrate proteins both in vivo and in vitro. However, preliminary aspects, such as influence of co-expressing GroEL and GroES on the over expression of other recombinant proteins in E. coli cells and subsequent growth aspects, as well as the conditions for optimum production of recombinant proteins in presence of recombinant chaperones have not been properly investigated. In the present study we have demonstrated the temperature dependent growth characteristics of E. coli cells, which are over expressing recombinant aconitase and how the co-expression of E. coli chaperonin GroEL and GroES influence the growth rate of the cells and in vivo folding of recombinant aconitase. Presence of co-expressed GroEL reduces the aconitase over-expression drastically; however, exogenous GroEL & GroES together compensate this reduction. For the aconitase over-expressing cells the growth rate decreases by 30% at 25 degrees C when compared with the M15 E. coli cells, however, there is an increase of 20% at 37 degrees C indicating the participation of endogenous chaperonin in the folding of a fraction of over expressed aconitase. However, in presence of co-expressed GroEL and GroES the growth rate of aconitase producing cells was enhanced by 30% at 37 degrees C confirming the assistance of exogenous chaperone system for the folding of recombinant aconitase. Optimum in vivo folding of aconitase requires co-production of complete E. coli chaperonin machinery GroEL and GroES together.     

Stimulating the substrate folding activity of a single ring GroEL variant by modulating the cochaperonin GroES

In mediating protein folding, chaperonin GroEL and cochaperonin GroES form an enclosed chamber for substrate proteins in an ATP-dependent manner. The essential role of the double ring assembly of GroEL is demonstrated by the functional deficiency of the single ring GroEL(SR). The GroEL(SR)-GroES is highly stable with minimal ATPase activity. To restore the ATP cycle and the turnover of the folding chamber, we sought to weaken the GroEL(SR)-GroES interaction systematically by concatenating seven copies of groES to generate groES(7). GroES Ile-25, Val-26, and Leu-27, residues on the GroEL-GroES interface, were substituted with Asp on different groES modules of groES(7). GroES(7) variants activate ATP activity of GroEL(SR), but only some restore the substrate folding function of GroEL(SR), indicating a direct role of GroES in facilitating substrate folding through its dynamics with GroEL. Active GroEL(SR)-GroES(7) systems may resemble mammalian mitochondrial chaperonin systems.     

Molecular chaperones: Inside and outside the Anfinsen cage

The GroEL/GroES chaperonin system acts as a passive anti-aggregation cage for refolding rubisco and rhodanese, and not as an active unfolding device. Refolding aconitase is too large to enter the cage but reversible binding to GroEL reduces its aggregration. Unexpectedly, confinement in the cage increases the rate of refolding of rubisco, but not rhodanese.     

A mutation in GroEL interferes with protein folding by reducing the rate of discharge of sequestered polypeptides.

GroEL140, a mutant Escherichia coli chaperonin unable to support bacteriophage lambda head assembly, was purified to near homogeneity and compared to wild type GroEL (cpn60). GroEL140 exhibited a 1.5-fold lower ATPase activity relative to the wild type protein. The hydrolysis of ATP by both polypeptides was fully inhibited by an excess of ATP gamma S and partially inhibited by ADP and 5'-adenylylimidodiphosphate, suggesting that adenine nucleotides display different affinities for the ATP binding site of chaperonins. GroEL140 was more sensitive to trypsin digestion compared to wild type GroEL indicating that the mutation destabilized the conformation of the mutant. The proteolytic susceptibility of both chaperonins was similarly enhanced upon addition of ATP, ADP or non-hydrolyzable ATP analogs, providing evidence (i) of a conformational change in the chaperonin structure which is likely to drive the protein discharge process, and (ii) that hydrolysis of ATP is not required to achieve topological modifications. GroEL140 retained its ability to bind non-native ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rbu-P2-carboxylase), but released bound proteins upon addition of ATP and GroES (cpn 10) 6-7-fold less efficiently compared to GroEL. This functional defect was shown to be related to a suboptimal, but not an absence of, interaction with GroES since (i) GroEL140 and GroES were unable to form a complex isolatable by size exclusion chromatography, and (ii) increasing the incubation time or the concentration of GroES enhanced the amount of refolded Rbu-P2-carboxylase discharged from GroEL140-Rbu-P2-carboxylase binary complexes. Pulse-chase experiments involving a double immunoabsorption technique confirmed that Rbu-P2-carboxylase remained associated two times longer with GroEL140 than with GroEL in vivo.     

Role of the gamma-phosphate of ATP in triggering protein folding by GroEL-GroES: function, structure and energetics

Productive cis folding by the chaperonin GroEL is triggered by the binding of ATP but not ADP, along with cochaperonin GroES, to the same ring as non-native polypeptide, ejecting polypeptide into an encapsulated hydrophilic chamber. We examined the specific contribution of the gamma-phosphate of ATP to this activation process using complexes of ADP and aluminium or beryllium fluoride. These ATP analogues supported productive cis folding of the substrate protein, rhodanese, even when added to already-formed, folding-inactive cis ADP ternary complexes, essentially introducing the gamma-phosphate of ATP in an independent step. Aluminium fluoride was observed to stabilize the association of GroES with GroEL, with a substantial release of free energy (-46 kcal/mol). To understand the basis of such activation and stabilization, a crystal structure of GroEL-GroES-ADP.AlF3 was determined at 2.8 A. A trigonal AlF3 metal complex was observed in the gamma-phosphate position of the nucleotide pocket of the cis ring. Surprisingly, when this structure was compared with that of the previously determined GroEL-GroES-ADP complex, no other differences were observed. We discuss the likely basis of the ability of gamma-phosphate binding to convert preformed GroEL-GroES-ADP-polypeptide complexes into the folding-active state.     

Structural plasticity and noncovalent substrate binding in the GroEL apical domain. A study using electrospay ionization mass spectrometry and fluorescence binding studies

Advances in understanding how GroEL binds to non-native proteins are reported. Conformational flexibility in the GroEL apical domain, which could account for the variety of substrates that GroEL binds, is illustrated by comparison of several independent crystallographic structures of apical domain constructs that show conformational plasticity in helices H and I. Additionally, ESI-MS indicates that apical domain constructs have co-populated conformations at neutral pH. To assess the ability of different apical domain conformers to bind co-chaperone and substrate, model peptides corresponding to the mobile loop of GroES and to helix D from rhodanese were studied. Analysis of apical domain-peptide complexes by ESI-MS indicates that only the folded or partially folded apical domain conformations form complexes that survive gas phase conditions. Fluorescence binding studies show that the apical domain can fully bind both peptides independently. No competition for binding was observed, suggesting the peptides have distinct apical domain-binding sites. Blocking the GroES-apical domain-binding site in GroEL rendered the chaperonin inactive in binding GroES and in assisting the folding of denatured rhodanese, but still capable of binding non-native proteins, supporting the conclusion that GroES and substrate proteins have, at least partially, distinct binding sites even in the intact GroEL tetradecamer.     

Chaperonins facilitate the in vitro folding of monomeric mitochondrial rhodanese.

In vitro refolding of the monomeric mitochondrial enzyme, rhodanese (thiosulfate sulfurtransferase; EC 2.8.1.1) is facilitated by molecular chaperonins. The four components: two proteins from Escherichia coli, chaperonin 60 (groEL) and chaperonin 10 (groES), MgATP, and K+, are necessary for the in vitro folding of rhodanese. These were previously shown to be necessary for the in vitro folding of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase at temperatures in excess of 25 degrees C (Viitanen, P. V., Lubben, T. H., Reed, J., Goloubinoff, P., O'Keefe, D. P., and Lorimer, G. H. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 5665-5671). The labile folding intermediate, rhodanese-I, which rapidly aggregates at 37 degrees C in the absence of the chaperonins, can be stabilized by forming a binary complex with chaperonin 60. The discharge of the binary chaperonin 60-rhodanese-I complex, results in the formation of active rhodanese, and requires the presence of chaperonin 10. Optimal refolding is associated with a K(+)-dependent hydrolysis of ATP. At lower protein concentrations and 25 degrees C, where aggregation is reduced, a fraction of the rhodanese refolds to an active form in the absence of the chaperonins. This spontaneous refolding can be arrested by chaperonin 60. There is some refolding (approximately equal to 20%) when ATP is replaced by nonhydrolyzable analogs, but there is no refolding in the presence of ADP or AMP. ATP analogs may interfere with the interaction of rhodanese-I with the chaperonins. Nondenaturing detergents facilitate rhodanese refolding by interacting with exposed hydrophobic surfaces of folding intermediates and thereby prevent aggregation (Tandon, S., and Horowitz, P. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 15615-15618). The chaperonin proteins appear to play a similar role in as much as they can replace the detergents. Consistent with this view, chaperonin 60, but not chaperonin 10, binds 2-3 molecules of the hydrophobic fluorescent reporter, 1,1'-bi(4-anilino)naphthalene-S,5'-disulfonic acid, indicating the presence of hydrophobic surfaces on chaperonin 60. The number of bound probe molecules is reduced to 1-2 molecules when chaperonin 10 and MgATP are added. The results support a model in which chaperonins facilitate folding, at least in part, by interacting with partly folded intermediates, thus preventing the interactions of hydrophobic surfaces that lead to aggregation.