De novo quantitative bisulfite sequencing using the pyrosequencing technology

Current protocols for DNA methylation analysis are either labor intensive or limited to the measurement of only one or two CpG positions. Pyrosequencing is a real-time sequencing technology that can overcome these limitations and be used as an epigenotype-mapping tool. Initial experiments demonstrated reliable quantification of the degree of DNA methylation when 2-6 CpGs were analyzed. We sought to improve the sequencing protocol so as to analyze as many CpGs as possible in a single sequencing run. By using an improved enzyme mix and adding single-stranded DNA-binding protein to the reaction, we obtained reproducible results for as many as 10 successive CpGs in a single sequencing reaction spanning up to 75 nucleotides. A minimum amount of 10 ng of bisulfite-treated DNA is necessary to obtain good reproducibility and avoid preferential amplification. We applied the assay to the analysis of DNA methylation patterns in four CpG islands in the vicinity of IGF2 and H19 genes. This allowed accurate and quantitative de novo sequencing of the methylation state of each CpG, showing reproducible variations of methylation state in contiguous CpGs, and proved to be a useful adjunct to current technologies.     

Genomic imprinting in mammals-epigenetic parental memories

Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic phenomenon that brings the difference of expression between paternally or maternally derived alleles and is specific for mammals in vertebrates. This imprint is established in the parental germlines and then inherited to the next generation to regulate expression of imprinted genes that are essential to support proper embryonic development. More than one hundred imprinted genes have been identified in mice and humans. Some are essential for embryonic development, especially placental formation, and others regulate metabolism, behavior and physiological functions. In humans, disruption of genomic imprinting causes several diseases, including cancer. Recently, the molecular mechanisms of genomic imprinting are getting clarified. How do parents regulate gene expression of their children? Why and how is genomic imprinting evolved in mammals? The review offers a handful of recent progress in this area.     

Upregulation of PHLDA2 in Dicer knockdown HEK293 cells

It has been reported that RNAi-dependent chromatin silencing in vertebrates is not restricted to the centromeres. To address whether RNAi machinery could regulate the chromatin structure of imprinted genes, we knocked down Dicer in HEK293 cells and found that the expression of PHLDA2, one of the several genes in the imprinted gene domain of 11p15.5, was specifically upregulated. This was accompanied by a shift towards more activated chromatin at PHLDA2 locus as indicated by change in H3K9 acetylation, however, the methylation state at this locus was not affected. Furthermore, we found that PHLDA2 was downregulated in growth-arrested HEK293 cells induced by either serum deprivation or contact inhibition. This suggests that PHLDA2 upregulation might be a direct result of Dicer depletion rather than the consequence of growth arrest induced by Dicer knockdown. Considering the reports that there is consistent placental outgrowth in PHLDA2 knockout mice and that PHLDA2 overexpression in mice causes growth inhibition, we speculate that PHLDA2 may be a candidate for contributing to the reduced growth rate of Dicer-deficient cells and the very early embryonic lethality in Dicer knockout mice.     

Chromatin regulators of genomic imprinting

Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic phenomenon in which genes are expressed monoallelically in a parent-of-origin-specific manner. Each chromosome is imprinted with its parental identity. Here we will discuss the nature of this imprinting mark. DNA methylation has a well-established central role in imprinting, and the details of DNA methylation dynamics and the mechanisms that target it to imprinted loci are areas of active investigation. However, there is increasing evidence that DNA methylation is not solely responsible for imprinted expression. At the same time, there is growing appreciation for the contributions of post-translational histone modifications to the regulation of imprinting. The integration of our understanding of these two mechanisms is an important goal for the future of the imprinting field. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Chromatin and epigenetic regulation of animal development.     

DNA methylation dynamics of a maternally methylated DMR in the mouse Dlk1–Dio3 domain

The mouse delta-like homolog 1 and type III iodothyronine deiodinase (Dlk1–Dio3) imprinted domain contains three known paternally methylated differentially methylated regions (DMRs): intergenic DMR (IG-DMR), maternally expressed 3-DMR (Gtl2-DMR), and Dlk1-DMR. Here, we report the first maternally methylated DMR, CpG island 2 (CGI-2), is located approximately 800 bp downstream of miR-1188. CGI-2 is highly methylated in sperm and oocytes, de-methylated in pre-implantation embryos, and differentially re-methylated during post-implantation development. CGI-2, similarly to Gtl2-DMR and Dlk1-DMR, acquires differential methylation prior to embryonic day 7.5 (E7.5). Both H3K4me3 and H3K9me3 histone modifications are enriched at CGI-2. Furthermore, CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) binds to both alleles of CGI-2 in vivo. These results contribute to the investigation of imprinting regulation in this domain.     

Peg3, Cdkn1c和 Gtl2基因在克隆绵羊和自然分娩绵羊中的DNA甲基化水平检测

尽管研究证明很多克隆动物存在DNA甲基化异常的情况,却很少有研究比较克隆绵羊与自然分娩绵羊之间的甲基化情况,可能是由于克隆绵羊的获得、绵羊基因组、绵羊基因组印记等因素的限制．本研究中,为了证明克隆绵羊重编程的状况,克隆了Peg3基因的差异甲基化区域(differential methylated region,DMR),并且分析了Peg3、Cdkn1c、Gtl2在克隆绵羊和自然分娩绵羊不同组织中的甲基化水平．研究发现,在克隆绵羊和自然分娩绵羊中Peg3呈现为超甲基化水平,在克隆绵羊的肾脏和肺脏中DNA甲基化水平为95.45%、81.18%,相对于正常分娩的绵羊组织中的98.18%、87.27%无显著性差异,而Cdkn1c在两组实验动物中的肾脏和肺脏中表现为非甲基化水平,分别为0%、0.53%、0.53%和0.53%,Gtl2则是低甲基化水平,并且克隆绵羊与正常分娩绵羊之间的DNA甲基化水平无显著性差异(r² = 0.77)．这些结果表明,Peg3、Cdkn1c、Gtl2三个印记基因在克隆绵羊和自然分娩绵羊组织中呈现类似甲基化水平,无显著性差异．     

Novel cis-regulatory function in ICR-mediated imprinted repression of H19

Expression of coregulated imprinted genes, H19 and Igf2, is monoallelic and parent-of-origin-dependent. Like most imprinted genes, H19 and Igf2 are regulated by a differentially methylated imprinting control region (ICR). CTCF binding sites and DNA methylation at the ICR have previously been identified as key cis-acting elements required for proper H19/Igf2 imprinting. Here, we use mouse models to elucidate further the mechanism of ICR-mediated gene regulation. We specifically address the question of whether sequences outside of CTCF sites at the ICR are required for paternal H19 repression. To this end, we generated two types of mutant ICRs in the mouse: (i) deletion of intervening sequence between CTCF sites (H19^ICR?IVS), which changes size and CpG content at the ICR; and (ii) CpG depletion outside of CTCF sites (H19^ICR-8nrCG), which only changes CpG content at the ICR. Individually, both mutant alleles (H19^ICR?IVS and H19^ICR-8nrCG) show loss of imprinted repression of paternal H19. Interestingly, this loss of repression does not coincide with a detectable change in methylation at the H19 ICR or promoter. Thus, neither intact CTCF sites nor hypermethylation at the ICR is sufficient for maintaining the fully repressed state of the paternal H19 allele. Our findings demonstrate, for the first time in vivo, that sequence outside of CTCF sites at the ICR is required in cis for ICR-mediated imprinted repression at the H19/Igf2 locus. In addition, these results strongly implicate a novel role of ICR size and CpG density in paternal H19 repression.     

Environmental and nutritional effects on the epigenetic regulation of genes

Major efforts have been directed towards the identification of genetic mutations, their use as biomarkers, and the understanding of their consequences on human health and well-being. There is an emerging interest, however, in the possibility that environmentally-induced changes at levels other than the genetic information could have long-lasting consequences as well. This review summarises our current knowledge of how the environment, nutrition, and ageing affect the way mammalian genes are organised and transcribed, without changes in the underlying DNA sequence. Admittedly, the link between environment and epigenetics remains largely to be explored. However, recent studies indicate that environmental factors and diet can perturb the way genes are controlled by DNA methylation and covalent histone modifications. Unexpectedly, and not unlike genetic mutations, aberrant epigenetic alterations and their phenotypic effects can sometimes be passed on to the next generation.     

Nucleosome positioning signals in the DNA sequence of the human and mouse H19 imprinting control regions

We have investigated the sequences of the mouse and human H19 imprinting control regions (ICRs) to see whether they contain nucleosome positioning information pertinent to their function as a methylation-regulated chromatin boundary. Positioning signals were identified by an in vitro approach that employs reconstituted chromatin to comprehensively describe the contribution of the DNA to the most basic, underlying level of chromatin structure. Signals in the DNA sequence of both ICRs directed nucleosomes to flank and encompass the short conserved sequences that constitute the binding sites for the zinc finger protein CTCF, an essential mediator of insulator activity. The repeat structure of the human ICR presented a conserved array of strong positioning signals that would preferentially flank these CTCF binding sites with positioned nucleosomes, a chromatin structure that would tend to maintain their accessibility. Conversely, all four CTCF binding sites in the mouse sequence were located close to the centre of positioning signals that were stronger than those in their flanks; these binding sites might therefore be expected to be more readily incorporated into positioned nucleosomes. We found that CpG methylation did not effect widespread repositioning of nucleosomes on either ICR, indicating that allelic methylation patterns were unlikely to establish allele-specific chromatin structures for H19 by operating directly upon the underlying DNA-histone interactions; instead, epigenetic modulation of ICR chromatin structure is likely to be mediated principally at higher levels of control. DNA methylation did, however, both promote and inhibit nucleosome positioning at several sites in both ICRs and substantially negated one of the strongest nucleosome positioning signals in the human sequence, observations that underline the fact that this epigenetic modification can, nevertheless, directly and decisively modulate core histone-DNA interactions within the nucleosome.     

Timing of establishment of paternal methylation imprints in the mouse

Imprinted genes are characterized by predominant expression from one parental allele and differential DNA methylation. Few imprinted genes have been found to acquire a methylation mark in the male germ line, however, and only one of these, H19, has been studied in detail. We examined methylation of the Rasgrf1 and Gtl2 differentially methylated regions (DMR) to determine whether methylation is erased in male germ cells at e12.5 and when the paternal allele acquires methylation. We also compared their methylation dynamics with those of H19 and the maternally methylated gene Snrpn. Our results show that methylation is erased on Rasgrf1, H19, and Snrpn at e12.5, but that Gtl2 retains substantial methylation at this stage. Erasure of methylation marks on Gtl2 appears to occur later in female germ cells to give the unmethylated profile seen in mature MII oocytes. In the male germ line, de novo methylation of Rasgrf1, Gtl2, and H19 occurs in parallel between e12.5 and e17.5, but the DMR are not completely methylated until the mature sperm stage, suggesting a methylation dynamic different from that of IAP, L1, and minor satellite sequences, which have been shown to become fully methylated by e17.5 in male germ cells. This study also indicates important differences between different imprinted DMR in timing and extent of methylation in the germ cells.     

LUMA (LUminometric Methylation Assay)--a high throughput method to the analysis of genomic DNA methylation

Changes in genomic DNA methylation are recognized as important events in normal and pathological cellular processes, contributing both to normal development and differentiation as well as cancer and other diseases. Here, we report a novel method to estimate genome-wide DNA methylation, referred to as LUminometric Methylation Assay (LUMA). The method is based on combined DNA cleavage by methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes and polymerase extension assay by Pyrosequencing. The method is quantitative, highly reproducible and easy to scale up. Since no primary modification of genomic DNA, such as bisulfite treatment, is needed, the total assay time is only 6 h. In addition, the assay requires only 200-500 ng of genomic DNA and incorporates an internal control to eliminate the problem of varying amounts of starting DNA. The accuracy and linearity of LUMA were verified by in vitro methylated lambda DNA. In addition, DNA methylation levels were assessed by LUMA in DNA methyltransferase knock-out cell lines and after treatment with the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor (5-AzaCytidine). The LUMA assay may provide a useful method to analyze genome-wide DNA methylation for a variety of physiological and pathological conditions including etiologic, diagnostic and prognostic aspects of cancer.     

Ent-3,4-seco-labdane and ent-labdane diterpenoids from Croton stipuliformis (Euphorbiaceae)

From a methanolic extract of the leaves of Croton stipuliformis, three ent-3,4-seco-labdanes (1-3) and an ent-labdane (4) together with the known compounds 6-hydroxynidorellol (5), maravuic acid, and sitosterol were isolated and identified from their spectroscopic data. The absolute stereochemistry of compound 4 was determined by application of Mosher's method in the NMR tube.