Human and mouse protein-noncoding snoRNA host genes with dissimilar nucleotide sequences show chromosomal synteny

snoRNAs are small protein-noncoding RNAs essential for pre-rRNA processing and ribosome biogenesis, and are encoded intronically in host genes (HGs) that are either protein coding or noncoding. mRNAs of protein-noncoding HGs differ in their nucleotide sequences among species. Although the reason for such sequential divergence has not been well explained, we present evidence here that such structurally different HGs have evolved from a common ancestral gene. We first identified two novel protein-noncoding HGs (mU50HG-a and mU50HG-b) that intronically encode a mouse ortholog of a human snoRNA, hU50. The sequences of mU50HG mRNA differed from that of hU50HG. However, a chromosome mapping study revealed that mU50HG is located at 9E3-1, the murine segment syntenic to human 6q15, where hU50HG is located. Synteny is a phenomenon whereby gene orthologs are arranged in the same order at equivalent chromosomal loci in different species; synteny between two species means it is highly likely that the genes have evolved from a common ancestral gene. We then extended this mapping study to other protein-noncoding snoRNA-HGs, and found again that they are syntenic, implying that they have evolved from genes of common ancestral species. Furthermore, on these syntenic segments, exons of adjacent protein-coding genes were found to be far better conserved than those of noncoding HGs, suggesting that the exons of protein-noncoding snoRNA-HGs have been much more fragile during evolution.     

Plant U13 orthologues and orphan snoRNAs identified by RNomics of RNA from Arabidopsis nucleoli

Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) and small Cajal body-specific RNAs (scaRNAs) are non-coding RNAs whose main function in eukaryotes is to guide the modification of nucleotides in ribosomal and spliceosomal small nuclear RNAs, respectively. Full-length sequences of Arabidopsis snoRNAs and scaRNAs have been obtained from cDNA libraries of capped and uncapped small RNAs using RNA from isolated nucleoli from Arabidopsis cell cultures. We have identified 31 novel snoRNA genes (9 box C/D and 22 box H/ACA) and 15 new variants of previously described snoRNAs. Three related capped snoRNAs with a distinct gene organization and structure were identified as orthologues of animal U13snoRNAs. In addition, eight of the novel genes had no complementarity to rRNAs or snRNAs and are therefore putative orphan snoRNAs potentially reflecting wider functions for these RNAs. The nucleolar localization of a number of the snoRNAs and the localization to nuclear bodies of two putative scaRNAs was confirmed by in situ hybridization. The majority of the novel snoRNA genes were found in new gene clusters or as part of previously described clusters. These results expand the repertoire of Arabidopsis snoRNAs to 188 snoRNA genes with 294 gene variants.     

Small RNAs derived from snoRNAs

Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) guide RNA modification and are localized in nucleoli and Cajal bodies in eukaryotic cells. Components of the RNA silencing pathway associate with these structures, and two recent reports have revealed that a human and a protozoan snoRNA can be processed into miRNA-like RNAs. Here we show that small RNAs with evolutionary conservation of size and position are derived from the vast majority of snoRNA loci in animals (human, mouse, chicken, fruit fly), Arabidopsis, and fission yeast. In animals, sno-derived RNAs (sdRNAs) from H/ACA snoRNAs are predominantly 20–24 nucleotides (nt) in length and originate from the 3′ end. Those derived from C/D snoRNAs show a bimodal size distribution at ∼17–19 nt and >27 nt and predominantly originate from the 5′ end. SdRNAs are associated with AGO7 in Arabidopsis and Ago1 in fission yeast with characteristic 5′ nucleotide biases and show altered expression patterns in fly loquacious and Dicer-2 and mouse Dicer1 and Dgcr8 mutants. These findings indicate that there is interplay between the RNA silencing and snoRNA-mediated RNA processing systems, and that sdRNAs comprise a novel and ancient class of small RNAs in eukaryotes.     

Processing of the Intron-Encoded U18 Small Nucleolar RNA in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Relies on Both Exo- and Endonucleolytic Activities

Many small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) are encoded within introns of protein-encoding genes and are released by processing of their host pre-mRNA. We have investigated the mechanism of processing of the yeast U18 snoRNA, which is found in the intron of the gene coding for translational elongation factor EF-1β. We have focused our analysis on the relationship between splicing of the EF-1β pre-mRNA and production of the mature snoRNA. Mutations inhibiting splicing of the EF-1β pre-mRNA have been shown to produce normal U18 snoRNA levels together with the accumulation of intermediates deriving from the pre-mRNA, thus indicating that the precursor is an efficient processing substrate. Inhibition of 5′→3′ exonucleases obtained by insertion of G cassettes or by the use of a rat1-1 xrn1Δ mutant strain does not impair U18 release. In the Exo⁻ strain, 3′ cutoff products, diagnostic of an endonuclease-mediated processing pathway, were detected. Our data indicate that biosynthesis of the yeast U18 snoRNA relies on two different pathways, depending on both exonucleolytic and endonucleolytic activities: a major processing pathway based on conversion of the debranched intron and a minor one acting by endonucleolytic cleavage of the pre-mRNA.     

Methodological obstacles in knocking down small noncoding RNAs

In the recent past, several thousand noncoding RNA (ncRNA) genes have been predicted within eukaryal genomes. However, for their functional analysis only a few high-throughput methods are currently available to knock down selected ncRNA species, such as microRNAs, which are targeted by antisense probes, termed antagomirs. We thus compared the efficiencies of four knockdown strategies, previously mainly employed for the analysis of protein-coding genes, to study the function of ncRNAs, in particular, small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs). Thereby, the class of snoRNAs represents one of the most abundant ncRNA species. The majority of snoRNAs has been shown to mediate nucleotide modifications by targeting ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) through complementary antisense elements. However, some snoRNAs, termed “orphan snoRNAs,” lack telltale complementarities to rRNAs and thus their function remains elusive. We therefore applied RNA interference (RNAi), locked nucleic acid (LNA), or peptide nucleic acid antisense approaches, as well as a ribozyme-based strategy to knock down a snoRNA. As a proof of principle, we targeted the canonical U81 snoRNA, which has been shown to mediate modification of nucleotide A₃₉₁ within eukaryal 28S rRNA. Our results demonstrate that while RNAi is an unsuitable tool for snoRNA knockdown, a ribozyme-based strategy, as well as an LNA-antisense oligonucleotide approach, resulted in a decrease of U81 snoRNA expression levels up to 60%. However, no concomitant decrease in enzymatic activity of U81 snoRNA was observed, indicating that improvement of more efficient knockdown techniques for ncRNAs will be required in the future.     

A novel snoRNA gene cluster in yeast is transcribed as polycistronic pre-snoRNAs

Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) play an important role in eukaryotic rRNA biogenesis. By combination of a computer search of EMBL database and experimental procedure, a novel snoRNA coding sequence (Z8) was screened out and characterized from yeastSaccharomyces cerevisiue genome. Z8 snoRNA gene codes a boxC/D antisense snoRNA which guides, deduced from structure analysis, the 2′-O-ribose methylation at U₂₄₂₁ of 25S rRNA. After disruption of Z8 snoRNA gene, the methylation at corresponding site was abolished, but no gmwth delay was observed in various cultural temperatures. Z8 DNA is the first gene of a gene cluster consisting of three cognate snoRNA genes which are located on an intergenic region of chromosome XIII. This gene cluster is co-transcribed as a polycistronic precursor from a + 247 bp U snoRNA gene promoter, followed by processing to release individual snoRNAs, representing a new expression pattern of snoRNA genes.     

Mining small RNA sequencing data: a new approach to identify small nucleolar RNAs in Arabidopsis

Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) are noncoding RNAs that direct 2′-O-methylation or pseudouridylation on ribosomal RNAs or spliceosomal small nuclear RNAs. These modifications are needed to modulate the activity of ribosomes and spliceosomes. A comprehensive repertoire of snoRNAs is needed to expand the knowledge of these modifications. The sequences corresponding to snoRNAs in 18–26-nt small RNA sequencing data have been rarely explored and remain as a hidden treasure for snoRNA annotation. Here, we showed the enrichment of small RNAs at Arabidopsis snoRNA termini and developed a computational approach to identify snoRNAs on the basis of this characteristic. The approach successfully uncovered the full-length sequences of 144 known Arabidopsis snoRNA genes, including some snoRNAs with improved 5′- or 3′-end annotation. In addition, we identified 27 and 17 candidates for novel box C/D and box H/ACA snoRNAs, respectively. Northern blot analysis and sequencing data from parallel analysis of RNA ends confirmed the expression and the termini of the newly predicted snoRNAs. Our study especially expanded on the current knowledge of box H/ACA snoRNAs and snoRNA species targeting snRNAs. In this study, we demonstrated that the use of small RNA sequencing data can increase the complexity and the accuracy of snoRNA annotation.     

A novel snoRNA gene cluster in yeast is transcribed as polycistronic pre-snoRNAs

Small nueleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) play an important role in eukaryotic rRNA biogenesis. By combination of a computer search of EMBL database and experimental procedure, a novel snoRNA coding sequence (Z8) was screened out and characterized from yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Z8 snoRNA gene codes a boxC/D antisonse snoRNA which guides, deduced from structure analysis, the 2'-O-ribose methylation at U_(2421) of 25S rRNA. After disruption of Z8 snoRNA gene, the methylation at corresponding site was abolished, but no growth delay was observed in various cultural temperatures. Z8 DNA is the first gene of a gene cluster consisting of three cognate snoRNA genes which are located on an intergenie region of chromosome ⅩⅢ. This gene cluster is co-transcribed as a pelycistronic precursor from a 247 bp U snoRNA gene promoter, followed by processing to release individual snoRNAs, representing a new expression pattern of snoRNA genes.     

A novel snoRNA can direct site-specific 2'-O-ribose methylation of snRNAs in Oryza sativa

Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) are a kind of noncoding RNAs, and the vast majority of snoRNAs are involved in site-specific modifications of rRNAs. A novel box C/D snoRNA called snoR124 was found inOryza sativa, and it can direct 2'-O-ribose methylation of spliceosomal small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs). The snoRNA has two antisense elements, and the results of primer extensions at different dNTP concentrations provide evidence that snoR124 guide 2'-O-methylations of the C76 residue in the U4 snRNA and the T91 residue in the U5 snRNA. In addition, this snoRNA is located in a snoRNA gene cluster with another 7 snoRNAs which are identified to direct ribose methylations in rRNAs. This is consistent with the opinion that the snoRNA gene organization in plant is mainly gene cluster. The snoR124 is the first example of a snoRNA that directs modifications of RNAs other than rRNAs in plant; it will avail to get more insights into the function of snoRNAs in plant.     

Characterisation of the U83 and U84 small nucleolar RNAs: two novel 2'-O-ribose methylation guide RNAs that lack complementarities to ribosomal RNAs

In eukaryotic cells, the site-specific 2′-O-ribose methy-lation of ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) and the U6 spliceosomal small nuclear RNA (snRNA) is directed by small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs). The C and D box-containing 2′-O-methylation guide snoRNAs select the correct substrate nucleotide through formation of a long 10–21 bp interaction with the target rRNA and U6 snRNA sequences. Here, we report on the characterisation of two novel mammalian C/D box snoRNAs, called U83 and U84, that contain all the elements that are essential for accumulation and function of 2′-O-methylation guide snoRNAs. However, in contrast to all of the known 2′-O-methylation guide RNAs, the human, mouse and pig U83 and U84 snoRNAs feature no antisense elements complementary to rRNA or U6 snRNA sequences. The human U83 and U84 snoRNAs are not associated with maturing nucleolar pre-ribosomal particles, suggesting that they do not function in rRNA biogenesis. Since artificial substrate RNAs complementary to the evolutionarily conserved putative substrate recognition motifs of the U83 and U84 snoRNAs were correctly 2′-O-methy-lated in the nucleolus of mouse cells, we suggest that the new snoRNAs act as 2′-O-methylation guides for cellular RNAs other then rRNAs and the U6 snRNA.     

RNomics: an experimental approach that identifies 201 candidates for novel, small, non-messenger RNAs in mouse

In mouse brain cDNA libraries generated from small RNA molecules we have identified a total of 201 different expressed RNA sequences potentially encoding novel small non-messenger RNA species (snmRNAs). Based on sequence and structural motifs, 113 of these RNAs can be assigned to the C/D box or H/ACA box subclass of small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs), known as guide RNAs for rRNA. While 30 RNAs represent mouse homologues of previously identified human C/D or H/ACA snoRNAs, 83 correspond to entirely novel snoRNAS: Among these, for the first time, we identified four C/D box snoRNAs and four H/ACA box snoRNAs predicted to direct modifications within U2, U4 or U6 small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs). Furthermore, 25 snoRNAs from either class lacked antisense elements for rRNAs or snRNAS: Therefore, additional snoRNA targets have to be considered. Surprisingly, six C/D box snoRNAs and one H/ACA box snoRNA were expressed exclusively in brain. Of the 88 RNAs not belonging to either snoRNA subclass, at least 26 are probably derived from truncated heterogeneous nuclear RNAs (hnRNAs) or mRNAS: Short interspersed repetitive elements (SINEs) are located on five RNA sequences and may represent rare examples of transcribed SINES: The remaining RNA species could not as yet be assigned either to any snmRNA class or to a part of a larger hnRNA/mRNA. It is likely that at least some of the latter will represent novel, unclassified snmRNAS:     

Elucidating the role of C/D snoRNA in rRNA processing and modification in Trypanosoma brucei

Most eukaryotic C/D small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) guide 2′-O methylation (Nm) on rRNA and are also involved in rRNA processing. The four core proteins that bind C/D snoRNA in Trypanosoma brucei are fibrillarin (NOP1), NOP56, NOP58, and SNU13. Silencing of NOP1 by RNA interference identified rRNA-processing and modification defects that caused lethality. Systematic mapping of 2′-O-methyls on rRNA revealed the existence of hypermethylation at certain positions of the rRNA in the bloodstream form of the parasites, suggesting that this modification may assist the parasites in coping with the major temperature changes during cycling between their insect and mammalian hosts. The rRNA-processing defects of NOP1-depleted cells suggest the involvement of C/D snoRNA in trypanosome-specific rRNA-processing events to generate the small rRNA fragments. MRP RNA, which is involved in rRNA processing, was identified in this study in one of the snoRNA gene clusters, suggesting that trypanosomes utilize a combination of unique C/D snoRNAs and conserved snoRNAs for rRNA processing.     

SmD3 Regulates Intronic Noncoding RNA Biogenesis

Accumulation of excess lipid in nonadipose tissues is associated with oxidative stress and organ dysfunction and plays an important role in diabetic complications. To elucidate molecular events critical for lipotoxicity, we used retroviral promoter trap mutagenesis to generate mutant Chinese hamster ovary cell lines resistant to lipotoxic and oxidative stress. A previous report of a mutant from this screen demonstrated that under lipotoxic conditions, small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) in the rpL13a gene accumulate in the cytosol and serve as critical mediators of lipotoxic cell death. We now report a novel, independent mutant in which a single provirus disrupted one allele of the gene encoding the spliceosomal protein SmD3, creating a model of haploinsufficiency. We show that snoRNA expression and the abundance of snoRNA-containing intron lariats are decreased in SmD3 mutant cells, even though haploinsufficiency of SmD3 supports pre-mRNA splicing. The mechanism through which SmD3 regulates the expression of intronic snoRNAs likely involves effects of SmD3 on the levels of small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) U4 and U5. Our data implicate SmD3 as a critical determinant in the processing of intronic noncoding RNAs in general and as an upstream mediator of metabolic stress response pathways through the regulation of snoRNA expression.     

Systematic identification and characterization of porcine snoRNAs: structural,functional and developmental insights

Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) are 50‐ to 300‐nt non‐coding RNAs that are involved in critical cellular events, including rRNA/snRNA modification and splicing, ribosome genesis, telomerase formulation and cell proliferation. The identification of snoRNAs in the pig, which is a widely consumed commercial organism that also has important functions in medicine and biology, will enrich the snoRNA kingdom and provide evolutionary clues about snoRNAs. In this study, we performed a systematic identification of snoRNAs in Sus scrofa and obtained 120 candidate snoRNAs, 65 of which were predicted via sequencing from our constructed cDNA library. The others were obtained by computational screening. The primary structural features examined included the sequence length, GC content, conservation of common box motifs and nucleotide diversity. The results indicate that the primary features of H/ACA box snoRNAs are opposite to those of C/D box snoRNAs. Subsequently, based on chromosomal location and host gene determination, we assigned 91 snoRNAs to nine genome organization modes. Gene duplications and translocations are considered to contribute to the high abundant organization in evolution. Functional information about our novel snoRNAs, such as putative targets, modification sites and guide sequences, was predicted by orthologue alignment. A comparative analysis of predicted targets and possible modified loci on U6 snRNA and 5.8S and 18S rRNAs among five species revealed that targets of snoRNA are conserved among species. Furthermore, we performed a quantitative analysis of six representative snoRNA genes in two pig breeds during different developmental stages. Interestingly, all six snoRNAs from one breed expressed in a similar pattern over the tested time points; however, these same six genes had different expression patterns in the other pig breed. Specifically, expression of all six snoRNAs declined significantly from 65 to 90 days post‐coitus (dpc) and then increased slightly during adulthood in Tongcheng pigs, whereas the expression of the same six genes increased slowly from 65 dpc until adulthood in Landrace pigs. This expression pattern suggests that most housekeeping, non‐coding RNAs from a single pig breed may be similarly expressed during development. Our study adds to the knowledge about the snoRNA family by providing the first genome‐wide study of porcine snoRNAs. The comparative analysis of snoRNAs from different pig breeds gave us evolutionary insight into the function of snoRNAs.     

The box C/D motif directs snoRNA 5'-cap hypermethylation

The 5′-cap structure of most spliceosomal small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) and certain small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) undergoes hypermethylation from a 7-methylguanosine to a 2,2,7-trimethylguanosine structure. 5′-Cap hypermethylation of snRNAs is dependent upon a conserved sequence element known as the Sm site common to most snRNAs. Here we have performed a mutational analysis of U3 and U14 to determine the cis-acting sequences required for 5′-cap hypermethylation of Box C/D snoRNAs. We have found that both the conserved sequence elements Box C (termed C′ in U3) and Box D are necessary for cap hypermethylation. Furthermore, the terminal stem structure that is formed by sequences that flank Box C (C′ in U3) and Box D is also required. However, mutation of other conserved sequences has no effect on hypermethylation of the cap. Finally, the analysis of fragments of U3 and U14 RNAs indicates that the Box C/D motif, including Box C (C′ in U3), Box D and the terminal stem, is capable of directing cap hypermethylation. Thus, the Box C/D motif, which is important for snoRNA processing, stability, nuclear retention, protein binding, nucleolar localization and function, is also necessary and sufficient for cap hypermethylation of these RNAs.