The levels of vascular smooth as well as skeletal muscle actin mRNAs differ substantially among both myoblast and fibroblast lines with different skeletal myogenic potentials.

Little is known about the factors which regulate vascular smooth muscle (vsm) actin gene expression during skeletal myogenesis in culture. We have therefore looked for differences in the levels of accumulation of vsm actin mRNA among six mouse cell lines differing in apparent myogenic potential or in the complement of myogenesis determination genes which they express: NIH 3T3 and 10T1/2 non-myogenic fibroblasts and four myogenic lines--3T3-MyoD1 and 10EMc11s, MyoD/myogenin expressing sublines of the fibroblast lines, derived by transfer into the parent lines of a MyoD cDNA expression construct; C2C12, which expresses all four known myogenesis determination genes; and BC3H1, which expresses myf-5, myogenin, little herculin, and no MyoD. In differentiated cells of all four myogenic lines, vsm actin mRNA was expressed at levels dramatically higher than in growth-arrested NIH 3T3 cells, consistent with expression of vsm actin mRNA as an intrinsic part of the skeletal myogenic program somehow directed by myogenesis determination gene products. Interestingly, however, the level of vsm actin mRNA in growth arrested C3H10T1/2 fibroblasts was also dramatically higher than that in NIH 3T3. In view of these findings, and of the relative ease with which 10T1/2 as opposed to NIH 3T3 cells can be converted to myogenic lines, we hypothesize that factors which can act to regulate vsm actin gene expression in the absence of myogenesis determination gene expression may also influence the skeletal myogenic potential of the cells in which they are found. Among the myogenic lines, the ratio of vsm to skm actin mRNA was highest in BC3H1 cells, raising the possibility that were these cells forced to express MyoD and/or more herculin, as do the other myogenic lines, the ratio would decrease. Thus both fibroblast and myogenic lines will be useful for investigating the mechanisms controlling skeletal myogenesis and vsm and skm actin gene expression during myogenesis.     

The levels of vascular smooth as well as skeletal muscle actin mRNAS differ substantially among both myoblast and fibroblast lines with different skeletal myogenic potentials.

Little is known about the factors which regulate vascular smooth muscle (vsm) actin gene expression during skeletal myogenesis in culture. We have therefore looked for differences in the levels of accumulation of vsm actin mRNA among six mouse cell lines differing in apparent myogenic potential or in the complement of myogenesis determination genes which they express: NIH 3T3 and 10T1/2 non-myogenic fibroblasts and four myogenic lines--3T3-MyoD1 and 10EMc11s, MyoD/myogenin expressing sublines of the fibroblast lines, derived by transfer into the parent lines of a MyoD cDNA expression construct; C2C12, which expresses all four known myogenesis determination genes; and BC3H1, which expresses myf-5, myogenin, little herculin, and no MyoD. In differentiated cells of all four myogenic lines, vsm actin mRNA was expressed at levels dramatically higher than in growth-arrested NIH 3T3 cells, consistent with expression of vsm actin mRNA as an intrinsic part of the skeletal myogenic program somehow directed by myogenesis determination gene products. Interestingly, however, the level of vsm actin mRNA in growth arrested C3H10T1/2 fibroblasts was also dramatically higher than that in NIH 3T3. In view of these findings, and of the relative ease with which 10T1/2 as opposed to NIH 3T3 cells can be converted to myogenic lines, we hypothesize that factors which can act to regulate vsm actin gene expression in the absence of myogenesis determination gene expression may also influence the skeletal myogenic potential of the cells in which they are found. Among the myogenic lines, the ratio of vsm to skm actin mRNA was highest in BC3H1 cells, raising the possibility that were these cells forced to express MyoD and/or more herculin, as do the other myogenic lines, the ratio would decrease. Thus both fibroblast and myogenic lines will be useful for investigating the mechanisms controlling skeletal myogenesis and vsm and skm actin gene expression during myogenesis.     

Positive autoregulation of the myogenic determination gene MyoD1

Transfection of cDNA expression vectors encoding either MyoD1 or myogenin into 10T1/2 cells converts them to myogenic cells. We show that transfection of 10T1/2 cells with the MyoD1 cDNA activates expression of endogenous MyoD1 mRNA, indicating that MyoD1 is subject to positive autoregulation. This activation of endogenous MyoD1 mRNA was also observed in Swiss 3T6 cells, but not in several other fibroblast or adipoblast cell lines transfected with the MyoD1 cDNA. In addition, transfection of the MyoD1 cDNA leads to activation of myogenin expression, and transfection of the myogenin cDNA leads to activation of MyoD1 expression. Thus, MyoD1 and myogenin appear to function in a positive autoregulatory loop that could either: account for or contribute to the stability of myogenic commitment; or amplify the level of expression of both MyoD1 and myogenin above a critical threshold that is required for activation of the myogenic program.     

Conditional conversion of ES cells to skeletal muscle by an exogenous MyoD1 gene.

A variety of differentiated cell types can be converted to skeletal muscle cells following transfection with the myogenic regulatory gene MyoD1. To determine whether multipotent embryonic stem (ES) cells respond similarly, cultures of two ES cell lines were electroporated with a MyoD1 cDNA driven by the beta-actin promoter. All transfected clones, carrying a single copy of the exogenous gene, expressed high levels of MyoD1 mRNA. Surprisingly, although maintained in mitogen-rich medium, this ectopic expression was associated with a transactivation of the endogenous myogenin and myosin light chain 2 gene but not the endogenous MyoD1, MRF4, Myf5, the skeletal muscle actin, or the myosin heavy chain genes. Preferential myogenesis and the appearance of contracting skeletal muscle fibers were observed only when the transfected cells were allowed to differentiate in vitro, via embryoid bodies, in low-mitogen-containing medium. Myogenesis was associated with the activation of MRF4 and Myf5 genes and resulted in a significant increase in the level of myogenin mRNA. Not all cells were converted to skeletal muscle cells, indicating that only a subset of stem cells can respond to MyoD1. Moreover, the continued expression of the introduced gene was not required for myogenesis. These results show that ES cells can respond to MyoD1, but environmental factors control the expression of its myogenic differentiation function, that MyoD1 functions in ES cells even under environmental conditions that favor differentiation is not dominant (incomplete penetrance), that MyoD1 expression is required for the establishment of the myogenic program but not for its maintenance, and that the exogenous MyoD1 gene can trans-activate the endogenous myogenin and MLC2 genes in undifferentiated ES cells.     

Expression of myogenic factors in denervated chicken breast muscle: isolation of the chicken Myf5 gene.

In this study, we have isolated and characterized the chicken Myf5 gene, and cDNA clones encoding chicken MyoD1 and myogenin. The chicken Myf5 and MRF4 genes are tandemly located on a single genomic DNA fragment, and the chicken Myf5 gene is organized into at least three exons. Using genomic and cDNA probes, we further analyzed the mRNA levels of four myogenic factors during chicken breast muscle development. This analysis revealed that myogenin expression is restricted to in ovo stages in breast muscle, and is not detectable in neonatal and adult stages. On the other hand, Myf5 expression is detectable until day 7 post-hatching, and is not found in adult muscle, whereas high levels of MyoD1 and MRF4 are detectable at all stages. To further understand the roles of innervation on muscle maturation, we analyzed the expression of the four myogenic factors in denervated adult breast muscle. We found that MyoD1, myogenin, and MRF4 are induced at high levels in denervated muscle, whereas no change occurs in the level of Myf5. These studies suggest that innervation controls the relative abundance and type of myogenic factors that are expressed in adult muscle, and that when nerve control is removed, the muscle reverts to a neonatal phenotype, with the enhanced expression of three myogenic factors (MyoD1, myogenin, and MRF4).     

Myogenic gene expression at rest and after a bout of resistance exercise in young (18-30 yr) and old (80-89 yr) women.

The purpose of this study was to investigate mRNA expression of several key skeletal muscle myogenic controllers; myogenic differentiation factor (MyoD), muscle regulatory factor 4 (MRF4), myogenic factor 5 (Myf5), myogenin, myostatin, and myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) at rest and 4 h after a single bout of resistance exercise (RE) in young and old women. Eight young women (YW; 23 +/- 2 yr, 67 +/- 5 kg) and six old women (OW; 85 +/- 1 yr, 67 +/- 4 kg) performed 3 sets of 10 repetitions of bilateral knee extensions at 70% of one repetition maximum. Muscle biopsies were taken from the vastus lateralis before and 4 h after RE. Using real-time RT PCR, mRNA from the muscle samples was amplified and normalized to GAPDH. At rest, OW expressed higher (P < 0.05) levels of MyoD, MRF4, Myf5, myogenin, and myostatin compared with YW. In response to RE, there was a main time effect (P < 0.05) for the YW and OW combined in the upregulation of MyoD (2.0-fold) and MRF4 (1.4-fold) and in the downregulation of myostatin (2.2-fold). There was a trend (P = 0.08) for time x age interaction in MRF4. These data show that old women express higher myogenic mRNA levels at rest. The higher resting myogenic mRNA levels in old women may reflect an attempt to preserve muscle mass and function. When challenged with RE, old women appear to respond in a similar manner as young women.     

c-myc inhibition of MyoD and myogenin-initiated myogenic differentiation.

In vertebrate development, a prominent feature of several cell lineages is the coupling of cell cycle regulation with terminal differentiation. We have investigated the basis of this relationship in the skeletal muscle lineage by studying the effects of the proliferation-associated regulator, c-myc, on the differentiation of MyoD-initiated myoblasts. Transient cotransfection assays in NIH 3T3 cells using MyoD and c-myc expression vectors demonstrated c-myc suppression of MyoD-initiated differentiation. A stable cell system was also developed in which MyoD expression was constitutive, while myc levels could be elevated conditionally. Induction of this conditional c-myc suppressed myogenesis effectively, even in the presence of MyoD. c-myc suppression also prevented up-regulation of a relative of MyoD, myogenin, which is normally expressed at the onset of differentiation in all muscle cell lines examined and may be essential for differentiation. Additional experiments tested whether failure to differentiate in the presence of myc could be overcome by providing myogenin ectopically. Cotransfection of c-myc with myogenin, MyoD, or a mixture of myogenin and MyoD showed that neither myogenin alone nor myogenin plus MyoD together could bypass the c-myc block. The effects of c-myc were further dissected by showing that c-myc can inhibit differentiation independently of Id, a negative regulator of muscle differentiation. These results lead us to propose that c-myc and Id constitute independent negative regulators of muscle differentiation, while myogenin and any of the other three related myogenic factors (MyoD, Myf-5, and MRF4/herculin/Myf-6) act as positive regulators.     

Expression of MRF4, a myogenic helix-loop-helix protein, produces multiple changes in the myogenic program of BC3H-1 cells.

Expression of MRF4, a myogenic regulatory factor of the basic helix-loop-helix type, produced multiple changes in the myogenic program of the BC3H-1 cell line. BC3H-1 cells that stably expressed exogenous MRF4 were prepared and termed BR cell lines. Upon differentiation, the BR cells were found to have three muscle-specific properties (endogenous MyoD expression, myoblast fusion, and fast myosin light-chain 1 expression) that the parent BC3H-1 cells did not have. Of the four known myogenic regulatory factors (MyoD, myogenin, Myf-5, and MRF4), only MRF4 was capable of activating expression of the endogenous BC3H-1 myoD gene. In addition, the pattern of Myf-5 expression in BR cells was the opposite of that in BC3H-1 cells. Myf-5 expression was low in BR myoblasts and showed a small increase upon myotube formation, whereas Myf-5 expression was high in BC3H-1 myoblasts and decreased upon differentiation. Though the MRF4-transfected BR cells fused to form large myotubes and expressed fast myosin light-chain 1, the pattern of myosin heavy-chain isoform expression was the same in the BR and the nonfusing parent BC3H-1 cells, suggesting that factors in addition to the MyoD family members regulate myosin heavy-chain isoform expression patterns in BC3H-1 cells. In contrast to the changes produced by MRF4 expression, overexpression of Myf-5 did not alter BC3H-1 myogenesis. The results suggest that differential expression of the myogenic regulatory factors of the MyoD family may be one mechanism for generating cells with diverse myogenic phenotypes.