Direct binding of visual arrestin to microtubules determines the differential subcellular localization of its splice variants in rod photoreceptors

Proper function of visual arrestin is indispensable for rapid signal shut-off in rod photoreceptors. Dramatic light-dependent changes in its subcellular localization are believed to play an important role in light adaptation of photoreceptor cells. Here we show that visual arrestin binds microtubules. The truncated splice variant of visual arrestin, p44, demonstrates dramatically higher affinity for microtubules than the full-length protein (p48). Enhanced microtubule binding of p44 underlies its earlier reported preferential localization to detergent-resistant membranes, where it is anchored via membrane-associated microtubules in a rhodopsin-independent fashion. Experiments with purified proteins demonstrate that arrestin interaction with microtubules is direct and does not require any additional protein partners. Most importantly, arrestin interactions with microtubules and light-activated phosphorylated rhodopsin are mutually exclusive, suggesting that microtubule interaction may play a role in keeping p44 arrestin away from rhodopsin in dark-adapted photoreceptors.     

Transition of arrestin into the active receptor-binding state requires an extended interdomain hinge

Arrestins selectively bind to the phosphorylated activated form of G protein-coupled receptors, thereby blocking further G protein activation. Structurally, arrestins consist of two domains topologically connected by a 12-residue long loop, which we term the "hinge" region. Both domains contain receptor-binding elements. The relative size and shape of arrestin and rhodopsin suggest that dramatic changes in arrestin conformation are required to bring all of its receptor-binding elements in contact with the cytoplasmic surface of the receptor. Here we use the visual arrestin/rhodopsin system to test the hypothesis that the transition of arrestin into its active receptor-binding state involves a movement of the two domains relative to each other that might be limited by the length of the hinge. We have introduced three insertions and 24 deletions in the hinge region and measured the binding of all of these mutants to light-activated phosphorylated (P-Rh*), dark phosphorylated (P-Rh), dark unphosphorylated (Rh), and light-activated unphosphorylated rhodopsin (Rh*). The addition of 1-3 extra residues to the hinge has no effect on arrestin function. In contrast, sequential elimination of 1-8 residues results in a progressive decrease in P-Rh* binding without changing arrestin selectivity for P-Rh*. These results suggest that there is a minimum length of the hinge region necessary for high affinity binding, consistent with the idea that the two domains move relative to each other in the process of arrestin transition into its active receptor-binding state. The same length of the hinge is also necessary for the binding of "constitutively active" arrestin mutants to P-Rh*, dark P-Rh, and Rh*, suggesting that the active (receptor-bound) arrestin conformation is essentially the same in both wild type and mutant forms.     

The interaction with the cytoplasmic loops of rhodopsin plays a crucial role in arrestin activation and binding

The binding of arrestin to rhodopsin is initiated by the interaction of arrestin with the phosphorylated rhodopsin C-terminus and/or the cytoplasmic loops, followed by conformational changes that expose an additional high-affinity site on arrestin. Here we use an arrestin mutant (R175E) that binds similarly to phosphorylated and unphosphorylated, wild-type rhodopsin to identify rhodopsin elements other than C-terminus important for arrestin interaction. R175E-arrestin demonstrated greatly reduced binding to unphosphorylated cytoplasmic loop mutants L72A, N73A, P142A and M143A, suggesting that these residues are crucial for high-affinity binding. Interestingly, when these rhodopsin mutants are phosphorylated, R175E-arrestin binding is less severely affected. This effect of phosphorylation on R175E-arrestin binding highlights the co-operative nature of the multi-site interaction between arrestin and the cytoplasmic loops and C-terminus of rhodopsin. However, a combination of any two mutations disrupts the ability of phosphorylation to enhance binding of R175E-arrestin. N73A, P142A and M143A exhibited accelerated rates of dissociation from wild-type arrestin. Using sensitivity to calpain II as an assay, these cytoplasmic loop mutants also demonstrated reduced ability to induce conformational changes in arrestin that correlated with their reduced ability to bind arrestin. These results suggest that arrestin bound to rhodopsin is in a distinct conformation that is co-ordinately regulated by association with the cytoplasmic loops and the C-terminus of rhodopsin.     

Regulation of arrestin binding by rhodopsin phosphorylation level

Arrestins ensure the timely termination of receptor signaling. The role of rhodopsin phosphorylation in visual arrestin binding was established more than 20 years ago, but the effects of the number of receptor-attached phosphates on this interaction remain controversial. Here we use purified rhodopsin fractions with carefully quantified content of individual phosphorylated rhodopsin species to elucidate the impact of phosphorylation level on arrestin interaction with three biologically relevant functional forms of rhodopsin: light-activated and dark phosphorhodopsin and phospho-opsin. We found that a single receptor-attached phosphate does not facilitate arrestin binding, two are necessary to induce high affinity interaction, and three phosphates fully activate arrestin. Higher phosphorylation levels do not increase the stability of arrestin complex with light-activated rhodopsin but enhance its binding to the dark phosphorhodopsin and phospho-opsin. The complex of arrestin with hyperphosphorylated light-activated rhodopsin is less sensitive to high salt and appears to release retinal faster. These data suggest that arrestin likely quenches rhodopsin signaling after the third phosphate is added by rhodopsin kinase. The complex of arrestin with heavily phosphorylated rhodopsin, which appears to form in certain disease states, has distinct characteristics that may contribute to the phenotype of these visual disorders.     

Binding of arrestin to cytoplasmic loop mutants of bovine rhodopsin

The binding of arrestin to rhodopsin is a multistep process that begins when arrestin interacts with the phosphorylated C terminus of rhodopsin. This interaction appears to induce a conformational change in arrestin that exposes a high-affinity binding site for rhodopsin. Several studies in which synthetic peptides were used have suggested that sites on the rhodopsin cytoplasmic loops are involved in this interaction. However, the precise amino acids on rhodopsin that participate in this interaction are unknown. This study addresses the role of specific amino acids in the cytoplasmic loops of rhodopsin in binding arrestin through the use of site-directed mutagenesis and direct binding assays. A series of alanine mutants within the three cytoplasmic loops of rhodopsin were expressed in HEK-293 cells, reconstituted with 11-cis-retinal, prephosphorylated with rhodopsin kinase, and examined for their ability to bind in vitro-translated, 35S-labeled arrestin. Mutations at Asn-73 in loop I as well as at Pro-142 and Met-143 in loop II resulted in dramatic decreases in the level of arrestin binding, whereas the level of phosphorylation by rhodopsin kinase was similar to that of wild-type rhodopsin. The results indicate that these amino acids play a significant role in arrestin binding.     

Phosphorylated rhodopsin and heparin induce similar conformational changes in arrestin

Photoactivated rhodopsin is quenched upon its phosphorylation in the reaction catalyzed by rhodopsin kinase and the subsequent binding of a regulatory protein, arrestin. We have found that heparin and other polyanions compete with photoactivated, phosphorylated rhodopsin to bind arrestin (48-kDa protein, S-antigen). This is shown (a) by the suppression of stabilized metarhodopsin II; (b) by changes in the digestion of arrestin in the presence of heparin; and (c) by the restoration of arrestin-quenched phosphodiesterase activity. When bound to arrestin, heparin also mimics phosphorylated rhodopsin by similarly exposing arrestin to limited proteolysis. We conclude that heparin and rhodopsin have similar means of binding to arrestin, and we propose a cationic region of arrestin (beginning with Lys163 of the bovine sequence) as the interaction site. In agreement with previous kinetic data we interpret the results in terms of a binding conformation of arrestin which is stabilized by rhodopsin or heparin and is open to proteolytic attack.     

Mapping the arrestin-receptor interface. Structural elements responsible for receptor specificity of arrestin proteins

Arrestins selectively bind to phosphorylated activated forms of their cognate G protein-coupled receptors. Arrestin binding prevents further G protein activation and often redirects signaling to other pathways. The comparison of the high-resolution crystal structures of arrestin2, visual arrestin, and rhodopsin as well as earlier mutagenesis and peptide inhibition data collectively suggest that the elements on the concave sides of both arrestin domains most likely participate in receptor binding directly, thereby dictating its receptor preference. Using comparative binding of visual arrestin/arrestin2 chimeras to the preferred target of visual arrestin, light-activated phosphorylated rhodopsin (PRh*), and to the arrestin2 target, phosphorylated activated m2 muscarinic receptor (P-m2 mAChR*), we identified the elements that determine the receptor specificity of arrestins. We found that residues 49-90 (beta-strands V and VI and adjacent loops in the N-domain) and 237-268 (beta-strands XV and XVI in the C-domain) in visual arrestin and homologous regions in arrestin2 are largely responsible for their receptor preference. Only 35 amino acids (22 of which are nonconservative substitutions) in the two elements are different. Simultaneous exchange of both elements between visual arrestin and arrestin2 fully reverses their receptor specificity, demonstrating that these two elements in the two domains of arrestin are necessary and sufficient to determine their preferred receptor targets.     

Squid visual arrestin: cDNA cloning and calcium-dependent phosphorylation by rhodopsin kinase (SQRK)

Arrestin binding to rhodopsin is one of the major mechanisms of termination of photoresponses in both vertebrates and invertebrates. Here we report the cDNA cloning and characterization of a 48-kDa visual arrestin from squid (Loligo pealei). The cDNA encoded a protein that had 56-64% amino acid sequence similarity to reported arrestin sequences. This protein does not encode any distinct modular domains but contains five fingerprint regions that have been identified within arrestins. Antibodies raised to the recombinant arrestin protein detected arrestin expression only in the eye and recognized a doublet in photoreceptor membranes, representing unphosphorylated and phosphorylated arrestin. In squid eye membranes, arrestin was phosphorylated in a Ca2+-dependent manner and this phosphorylation was inhibited by antibodies raised against squid rhodopsin kinase, but not by inhibitors of protein kinase C or calmodulin kinase. Addition of purified squid rhodopsin kinase to washed rhabdomeric membranes resulted in phosphorylation of rhodopsin, and arrestin was also phosphorylated when calcium was present. This is the first report of a rhodopsin kinase phosphorylating an arrestin substrate, and suggests a dual role for this kinase in the inactivation of the squid visual system.     

The solution structure and activation of visual arrestin studied by small-angle X-ray scattering.

Visual arrestin is converted from a 'basal' state to an 'activated' state by interaction with the phosphorylated C-terminus of photoactivated rhodopsin (R*), but the conformational changes in arrestin that lead to activation are unknown. Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) was used to investigate the solution structure of arrestin and characterize changes attendant upon activation. Wild-type arrestin forms dimers with a dissociation constant of 60 micro m. Small conformational changes, consistent with local movements of loops or the mobile N- or C-termini of arrestin, were observed in the presence of a phosphopeptide corresponding to the C-terminus of rhodopsin, and with an R175Q mutant. Because both the phosphopeptide and the R175Q mutation promote binding to unphosphorylated R*, we conclude that arrestin is activated by subtle conformational changes. Most of the arrestin will be in a dimeric state in vivo. Using the arrestin structure as a guide [Hirsch, J.A., Schubert, C., Gurevich, V.V. & Sigler, P.B. (1999) Cell 97, 257-269], we have identified a model for the arrestin dimer that is consistent with our SAXS data. In this model, dimerization is mediated by the C-terminal domain of arrestin, leaving the N-terminal domains free for interaction with phosphorylated R*.     

Interaction of a fragment of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor C-terminus with arrestin-2

Desensitization of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor is mediated by the interaction with arrestin. In this study, we report the structural changes of a synthetic diphosphorylated peptide corresponding to residues 419-439 of the CB1 C-terminus upon binding to arrestin-2. This segment is pivotal to the desensitization of CB1. Using high-resolution proton NMR, we observe two helical segments in the bound peptide that are separated by the presence a glycine residue. The binding we observe is with a diphoshorylated peptide, whereas a previous study reported binding of a highly phosphorylated rhodopsin fragment to visual arrestin. The arrestin bound conformations of the peptides are compared.     

Light-dependent redistribution of arrestin in vertebrate rods is an energy-independent process governed by protein-protein interactions

In rod photoreceptors, arrestin localizes to the outer segment (OS) in the light and to the inner segment (IS) in the dark. Here, we demonstrate that redistribution of arrestin between these compartments can proceed in ATP-depleted photoreceptors. Translocation of transducin from the IS to the OS also does not require energy, but depletion of ATP or GTP inhibits its reverse movement. A sustained presence of activated rhodopsin is required for sequestering arrestin in the OS, and the rate of arrestin relocalization to the OS is determined by the amount and the phosphorylation status of photolyzed rhodopsin. Interaction of arrestin with microtubules is increased in the dark. Mutations that enhance arrestin-microtubule binding attenuate arrestin translocation to the OS. These results indicate that the distribution of arrestin in rods is controlled by its dynamic interactions with rhodopsin in the OS and microtubules in the IS and that its movement occurs by simple diffusion.     

Cell-free expression of visual arrestin. Truncation mutagenesis identifies multiple domains involved in rhodopsin interaction.

Visual arrestin plays an important role in regulating light responsiveness via its ability to specifically bind to the phosphorylated and light-activated form of rhodopsin. To further characterize rhodopsin/arrestin interactions we have utilized a rabbit reticulocyte lysate translation system to synthesize bovine visual arrestin. The translated arrestin (404 amino acids) was demonstrated to be fully functional in terms of its ability to specifically recognize and bind to phosphorylated light-activated rhodopsin (P-Rh*). Competitive binding studies revealed that the in vitro synthesized arrestin and purified bovine visual arrestin had comparable affinities for P-Rh*. In an effort to assess the functional role of different regions of the arrestin molecule, two truncated arrestin mutants were produced by cutting within the open reading frame of the bovine arrestin cDNA with selective restriction enzymes. In vitro translation of the transcribed truncated mRNAs resulted in the production of arrestins truncated from the carboxyl terminus. The ability of each of the mutant arrestins to bind to dark (Rh), light-activated (Rh*), dark phosphorylated (P-Rh), and light-activated phosphorylated rhodopsin were then compared. Arrestin lacking 39 carboxyl-terminal residues binds specifically not only to P-Rh* but also to Rh* and P-Rh. This suggests that the carboxyl-terminal domain of arrestin plays an important regulatory role in ensuring strict arrestin binding selectivity to P-Rh*. Arrestin that has only the first 191 amino-terminal residues predominately discriminates the phosphorylation state of the rhodopsin; however, it also retains some binding specificity for the activation state. These results suggest that the amino-terminal half of arrestin contains key rhodopsin recognition sites responsible for interaction with both the phosphorylated and light-activated forms of rhodopsin.     

Experimental and computational studies of the desensitization process in the bovine rhodopsin-arrestin complex

The deactivation of the bovine G-protein-coupled receptor, rhodopsin, is a two-step process consisting of the phosphorylation of specific serine and threonine residues in the cytoplasmic tail of rhodopsin by rhodopsin kinase. Subsequent binding of the regulatory protein arrestin follows this phosphorylation. Previous results find that at least three phosphorylatable sites on the rhodopsin tail (T340) and at least two of the S338, S334, or S343 sites are needed for complete arrestin-mediated deactivation. Thus, to elucidate the details of the interaction between rhodopsin with arrestin, we have employed both a computational and an in vitro experimental approach. In this work, we first simulated the interaction of the carboxy tail of rhodopsin with arrestin using a Monte Carlo simulated annealing method. Since at this time phosphorylation of specific serines and threonines is not possible in our simulations, we substitute either aspartic or glutamic acid residues for the negatively charged phosphorylated residues required for binding. A total of 17 simulations were performed and analysis of this shows specific charge-charge interactions of the carboxy tail of rhodopsin with arrestin. We then confirmed these computational results with assays of comparable constructed rhodopsin mutations using our in vitro assay. This dual computational/experimental approach indicates that sites S334, S338, and T340 in rhodopsin and K14 and K15 on arrestin are indeed important in the interaction of rhodopsin with arrestin, with a possible weaker S343 (rhodopsin)/K15 (arrestin) interaction.     

Cone arrestin binding to JNK3 and Mdm2: conformational preference and localization of interaction sites

Arrestins are multi-functional regulators of G protein-coupled receptors. Receptor-bound arrestins interact with >30 remarkably diverse proteins and redirect the signaling to G protein-independent pathways. The functions of free arrestins are poorly understood, and the interaction sites of the non-receptor arrestin partners are largely unknown. In this study, we show that cone arrestin, the least studied member of the family, binds c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK3) and Mdm2 and regulates their subcellular distribution. Using arrestin mutants with increased or reduced structural flexibility, we demonstrate that arrestin in all conformations binds JNK3 comparably, whereas Mdm2 preferentially binds cone arrestin 'frozen' in the basal state. To localize the interaction sites, we expressed separate N- and C-domains of cone and rod arrestins and found that individual domains bind JNK3 and remove it from the nucleus as efficiently as full-length proteins. Thus, the arrestin binding site for JNK3 includes elements in both domains with the affinity of partial sites on individual domains sufficient for JNK3 relocalization. N-domain of rod arrestin binds Mdm2, which localizes its main interaction site to this region. Comparable binding of JNK3 and Mdm2 to four arrestin subtypes allowed us to identify conserved residues likely involved in these interactions.     

Monomeric Rhodopsin Is the Minimal Functional Unit Required for Arrestin Binding

We have tested whether arrestin binding requires the G-protein-coupled receptor be a dimer or a multimer. To do this, we encapsulated single-rhodopsin molecules into nanoscale phospholipid particles (so-called nanodiscs) and measured their ability to bind arrestin. Our data clearly show that both visual arrestin and β-arrestin 1 can bind to monomeric rhodopsin and stabilize the active metarhodopsin II form. Interestingly, we find that the monomeric rhodopsin in nanodiscs has a higher affinity for wild-type arrestin binding than does oligomeric rhodopsin in liposomes or nanodiscs, as assessed by stabilization of metarhodopsin II. Together, these results establish that rhodopsin self-association is not required to enable arrestin binding.     

How does arrestin respond to the phosphorylated state of rhodopsin?

Visual arrestin quenches light-induced signaling by binding to light-activated, phosphorylated rhodopsin (P-Rh*). Here we present structure-function data, which in conjunction with the refined crystal structure of arrestin (Hirsch, J. A., Schubert, C., Gurevich, V. V., and Sigler, P. B. (1999) Cell, in press), support a model for the conversion of a basal or "inactive" conformation of free arrestin to one that can bind to and inhibit the light activated receptor. The trigger for this transition is an interaction of the phosphorylated COOH-terminal segment of the receptor with arrestin that disrupts intramolecular interactions, including a hydrogen-bonded network of buried, charged side chains, referred to as the "polar core." This disruption permits structural adjustments that allow arrestin to bind to the receptor. Our mutational survey identifies residues in arrestin (Arg175, Asp30, Asp296, Asp303, Arg382), which when altered bypass the need for the interaction with the receptor's phosphopeptide, enabling arrestin to bind to activated, nonphosphorylated rhodopsin (Rh*). These mutational changes disrupt interactions and substructures which the crystallographic model and previous biochemical studies have shown are responsible for maintaining the inactive state. The molecular basis for these disruptions was confirmed by successfully introducing structure-based second site substitutions that restored the critical interactions. The nearly absolute conservation of the mutagenically sensitive residues throughout the arrestin family suggests that this mechanism is likely to be applicable to arrestin-mediated desensitization of most G-protein-coupled receptors.     

An additional phosphate-binding element in arrestin molecule. Implications for the mechanism of arrestin activation

Arrestins quench the signaling of a wide variety of G protein-coupled receptors by virtue of high-affinity binding to phosphorylated activated receptors. The high selectivity of arrestins for this particular functional form of receptor ensures their timely binding and dissociation. In a continuing effort to elucidate the molecular mechanisms responsible for arrestin's selectivity, we used the visual arrestin model to probe the functions of its N-terminal beta-strand I comprising the highly conserved hydrophobic element Val-Ile-Phe (residues 11-13) and the adjacent positively charged Lys(14) and Lys(15). Charge elimination and reversal in positions 14 and 15 dramatically reduce arrestin binding to phosphorylated light-activated rhodopsin (P-Rh*). The same mutations in the context of various constitutively active arrestin mutants (which bind to P-Rh*, dark phosphorylated rhodopsin (P-Rh), and unphosphorylated light-activated rhodopsin (Rh*)) have minimum impact on P-Rh* and Rh* binding and virtually eliminate P-Rh binding. These results suggest that the two lysines "guide" receptor-attached phosphates toward the phosphorylation-sensitive trigger Arg(175) and participate in phosphate binding in the active state of arrestin. The elimination of the hydrophobic side chains of residues 11-13 (triple mutation V11A, I12A, and F13A) moderately enhances arrestin binding to P-Rh and Rh*. The effects of triple mutation V11A, I12A, and F13A in the context of phosphorylation-independent mutants suggest that residues 11-13 play a dual role. They stabilize arrestin's basal conformation via interaction with hydrophobic elements in arrestin's C-tail and alpha-helix I as well as its active state by interactions with alternative partners. In the context of the recently solved crystal structure of arrestin's basal state, these findings allow us to propose a model of initial phosphate-driven structural rearrangements in arrestin that ultimately result in its transition into the active receptor-binding state.     

One-step purification of a functional, constitutively activated form of visual arrestin

Desensitization of agonist-activated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) requires phosphorylation followed by the binding of arrestin, a ~48 kDa soluble protein. While crystal structures for the inactive, 'basal' state of various arrestins are available, the conformation of 'activated' arrestin adopted upon interaction with activated GPCRs remains unknown. As a first step towards applying high-resolution structural methods to study arrestin conformation and dynamics, we have utilized the subtilisin prodomain/Profinity eXact? fusion-tag system for the high-level bacterial expression and one-step purification of wild-type visual arrestin (arrestin 1) as well as a mutant form (R175E) of the protein that binds to non-phosphorylated, light-activated rhodopsin (Rho?). The results show that both prodomain/Profinity eXact? fusion-tagged wild-type and R175E arrestins can be expressed to levels approaching 2-3 mg/l in Luria-Bertani media, and that the processed, tag-free mature forms can be purified to near homogeneity using a Bio-Scale? Mini Profinity eXact? cartridge on the Profinia? purification system. Functional analysis of R175E arrestin generated using this approach shows that it binds to non-phosphorylated rhodopsin in a light-dependent manner. These findings should facilitate the structure determination of this 'constitutively activated' state of arrestin 1 as well as the monitoring of conformational changes upon interaction with Rho?.     

Conformational changes in the phosphorylated C-terminal domain of rhodopsin during rhodopsin arrestin interactions

Phosphorylation of activated G-protein-coupled receptors and the subsequent binding of arrestin mark major molecular events of homologous desensitization. In the visual system, interactions between arrestin and the phosphorylated rhodopsin are pivotal for proper termination of visual signals. By using high resolution proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the phosphorylated C terminus of rhodopsin, represented by a synthetic 7-phosphopolypeptide, we show that the arrestin-bound conformation is a well ordered helix-loop structure connected to rhodopsin via a flexible linker. In a model of the rhodopsin-arrestin complex, the phosphates point in the direction of arrestin and form a continuous negatively charged surface, which is stabilized by a number of positively charged lysine and arginine residues of arrestin. Opposite to the mostly extended structure of the unphosphorylated C-terminal domain of rhodopsin, the arrestin-bound C-terminal helix is a compact domain that occupies a central position between the cytoplasmic loops and occludes the key binding sites of transducin. In conjunction with other binding sites, the helix-loop structure provides a mechanism of shielding phosphates in the center of the rhodopsin-arrestin complex and appears critical in guiding arrestin for high affinity binding with rhodopsin.     

Conservation of the phosphate-sensitive elements in the arrestin family of proteins.

Arrestins play a key role in the homologous desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). These cytosolic proteins selectively bind to the agonist-activated and GPCR kinase-phosphorylated forms of the GPCR, precluding its further interaction with the G protein. Certain mutations in visual arrestin yield "constitutively active" proteins that bind with high affinity to the light-activated form of rhodopsin without requiring phosphorylation. The crystal structure of visual arrestin shows that these activating mutations perturb two groups of intramolecular interactions that keep arrestin in its basal (inactive) state. Here we introduced homologous mutations into arrestin2 and arrestin3 and found that the resulting mutants bind to the beta(2)-adrenoreceptor in vitro in a phosphorylation-independent fashion. The same mutants effectively desensitize both the beta(2)-adrenergic and delta-opioid receptors in the absence of receptor phosphorylation in Xenopus oocytes. Moreover, the arrestin mutants also desensitize the truncated delta-opioid receptor from which the C terminus, containing critical phosphorylation sites, has been removed. Conservation of the phosphate-sensitive hot spots in non-visual arrestins suggests that the overall fold is similar to that of visual arrestin and that the mechanisms whereby receptor-attached phosphates drive arrestin transition into the active binding competent state are conserved throughout the arrestin family of proteins.