Molecular discrimination of structurally equivalent Lys 63‐linked and linear polyubiquitin chains

At least eight types of ubiquitin chain exist, and individual linkages affect distinct cellular processes. The only distinguishing feature of differently linked ubiquitin chains is their structure, as polymers of the same unit are chemically identical. Here, we have crystallized Lys 63‐linked and linear ubiquitin dimers, revealing that both adopt equivalent open conformations, forming no contacts between ubiquitin molecules and thereby differing significantly from Lys 48‐linked ubiquitin chains. We also examined the specificity of various deubiquitinases (DUBs) and ubiquitin‐binding domains (UBDs). All analysed DUBs, except CYLD, cleave linear chains less efficiently compared with other chain types, or not at all. Likewise, UBDs can show chain specificity, and are able to select distinct linkages from a ubiquitin chain mixture. We found that the UBAN (ubiquitin binding in ABIN and NEMO) motif of NEMO (NF‐κB essential modifier) binds to linear chains exclusively, whereas the NZF (Npl4 zinc finger) domain of TAB2 (TAK1 binding protein 2) is Lys 63 specific. Our results highlight remarkable specificity determinants within the ubiquitin system.     

Structural basis for specific recognition of Lys 63‐linked polyubiquitin chains by NZF domains of TAB2 and TAB3

TAB2 and TAB3 activate the Jun N‐terminal kinase and nuclear factor‐κB pathways through the specific recognition of Lys 63‐linked polyubiquitin chains by its Npl4 zinc‐finger (NZF) domain. Here we report crystal structures of the TAB2 and TAB3 NZF domains in complex with Lys 63‐linked diubiquitin at 1.18 and 1.40 Å resolutions, respectively. Both NZF domains bind to the distal ubiquitin through a conserved Thr‐Phe dipeptide that has been shown to be important for the interaction of the NZF domain of Npl4 with monoubiquitin. In contrast, a surface specific to TAB2 and TAB3 binds the proximal ubiquitin. Both the distal and proximal binding sites of the TAB2 and TAB3 NZF domains recognize the Ile 44‐centred hydrophobic patch on ubiquitin but do not interact with the Lys 63‐linked isopeptide bond. Mutagenesis experiments show that both binding sites are required to enable binding of Lys 63‐linked diubiquitin. We therefore propose a mechanism for the recognition of Lys 63‐linked polyubiquitin chains by TAB2 and TAB3 NZF domains in which diubiquitin units are specifically recognized by a single NZF domain.     

A single MIU motif of MINDY‐1 recognizes K48‐linked polyubiquitin chains

The eight different types of ubiquitin (Ub) chains that can be formed play important roles in diverse cellular processes. Linkage‐selective recognition of Ub chains by Ub‐binding domain (UBD)‐containing proteins is central to coupling different Ub signals to specific cellular responses. The motif interacting with ubiquitin (MIU) is a small UBD that has been characterized for its binding to monoUb. The recently discovered deubiquitinase MINDY‐1/FAM63A contains a tandem MIU repeat (tMIU) that is highly selective at binding to K48‐linked polyUb. We here identify that this linkage‐selective binding is mediated by a single MIU motif (MIU2) in MINDY‐1. The crystal structure of MIU2 in complex with K48‐linked polyubiquitin chains reveals that MIU2 on its own binds to all three Ub moieties in an open conformation that can only be accommodated by K48‐linked triUb. The weak Ub binder MIU1 increases overall affinity of the tMIU for polyUb chains without affecting its linkage selectivity. Our analyses reveal new concepts for linkage selectivity and polyUb recognition by UBDs.     

Linear polyubiquitination: a new regulator of NF‐κB activation

The ubiquitin‐conjugation system regulates a vast range of biological phenomena by affecting protein function mostly through polyubiquitin conjugation. The type of polyubiquitin chain that is generated seems to determine how conjugated proteins are regulated, as they are recognized specifically by proteins that contain chain‐specific ubiquitin‐binding motifs. An enzyme complex that catalyses the formation of newly described linear polyubiquitin chains—known as linear ubiquitin chain‐assembly complex (LUBAC)—has recently been characterized, as has a particular ubiquitin‐binding domain that specifically recognizes linear chains. Both have been shown to have crucial roles in the canonical nuclear factor‐κB (NF‐κB)‐activation pathway. The ubiquitin system is intimately involved in regulating the NF‐κB pathway, and the regulatory roles of K63‐linked chains have been studied extensively. However, the role of linear chains in this process is only now emerging. This article discusses the possible mechanisms underlying linear polyubiquitin‐mediated activation of NF‐κB, and the different roles that K63‐linked and linear chains have in NF‐κB activation. Future directions for linear polyubiquitin research are also discussed.     

Why do cellular proteins linked to K63-polyubiquitin chains not associate with proteasomes?

Although cellular proteins conjugated to K48‐linked Ub chains are targeted to proteasomes, proteins conjugated to K63‐ubiquitin chains are directed to lysosomes. However, pure 26S proteasomes bind and degrade K48‐ and K63‐ubiquitinated substrates similarly. Therefore, we investigated why K63‐ubiquitinated proteins are not degraded by proteasomes. We show that mammalian cells contain soluble factors that selectively bind to K63 chains and inhibit or prevent their association with proteasomes. Using ubiquitinated proteins as affinity ligands, we found that the main cellular proteins that associate selectively with K63 chains and block their binding to proteasomes are ESCRT0 (Endosomal Sorting Complex Required for Transport) and its components, STAM and Hrs. In vivo, knockdown of ESCRT0 confirmed that it is required to block binding of K63‐ubiquitinated molecules to the proteasome. In addition, the Rad23 proteins, especially hHR23B, were found to bind specifically to K48‐ubiquitinated proteins and to stimulate proteasome binding. The specificities of these proteins for K48‐ or K63‐ubiquitin chains determine whether a ubiquitinated protein is targeted for proteasomal degradation or delivered instead to the endosomal‐lysosomal pathway.     

Two-sided Ubiquitin Binding of NF-κB Essential Modulator (NEMO) Zinc Finger Unveiled by a Mutation Associated with Anhidrotic Ectodermal Dysplasia with Immunodeficiency Syndrome

Hypomorphic mutations in the X-linked human NEMO gene result in various forms of anhidrotic ectodermal dysplasia with immunodeficiency. NEMO function is mediated by two distal ubiquitin binding domains located in the regulatory C-terminal domain of the protein: the coiled-coil 2-leucine zipper (CC2-LZ) domain and the zinc finger (ZF) domain. Here, we investigated the effect of the D406V mutation found in the NEMO ZF of an ectodermal dysplasia with immunodeficiency patients. This point mutation does not impair the folding of NEMO ZF or mono-ubiquitin binding but is sufficient to alter NEMO function, as NEMO-deficient fibroblasts and Jurkat T lymphocytes reconstituted with full-length D406V NEMO lead to partial and strong defects in NF-κB activation, respectively. To further characterize the ubiquitin binding properties of NEMO ZF, we employed di-ubiquitin (di-Ub) chains composed of several different linkages (Lys-48, Lys-63, and linear (Met-1-linked)). We showed that the pathogenic mutation preferentially impairs the interaction with Lys-63 and Met-1-linked di-Ub, which correlates with its ubiquitin binding defect in vivo. Furthermore, sedimentation velocity and gel filtration showed that NEMO ZF, like other NEMO related-ZFs, binds mono-Ub and di-Ub with distinct stoichiometries, indicating the presence of a new Ub site within the NEMO ZF. Extensive mutagenesis was then performed on NEMO ZF and characterization of mutants allowed the proposal of a structural model of NEMO ZF in interaction with a Lys-63 di-Ub chain.     

Covalent Modification of the NF-κB Essential Modulator (NEMO) by a Chemical Compound Can Regulate Its Ubiquitin Binding Properties in Vitro

Post-translational modification by ubiquitin plays important roles in multiple physiological and pathological processes. Ubiquitin-binding proteins play a critical role in recognizing and relaying polyubiquitin-based signaling. NEMO (NF-κB Essential Modulator) is a central player in canonical NF-κB signaling whose major function is to bind to Lys-63- and/or M1- (or linear) linked polyubiquitin chains generated in response to cell stimulation. Here we show that Withaferin A (WA), a steroidal lactone, causes a change in NEMO''s interaction with specific types of polyubiquitin chains in vitro. WA induces full-length recombinant NEMO to bind to long Lys-48-linked polyubiquitin chains but not tetra-ubiquitin species. Significantly, the UBAN (ubiquitin binding in ABIN and NEMO) domain, essential for the ability of NEMO to bind M1/Lys-63-linked polyubiquitin, is dispensable for the WA-induced gain-of-function activity. Mass spectrometric analysis demonstrated that WA covalently modifies NEMO on a cysteine residue within the C-terminal zinc finger (ZF) domain. Point mutations to the ZF can reverse the WA-induced Lys-48-polyubiquitin binding phenotype. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of directly altering the ubiquitin interaction properties of an ubiquitin-binding protein by a chemical compound, thereby shedding light on a novel drug class to potentially alter polyubiquitin-based cellular processes.     

A20 inhibits LUBAC-mediated NF-κB activation by binding linear polyubiquitin chains via its zinc finger 7

Linear polyubiquitination of proteins has recently been implicated in NF-κB signalling and is mediated by the linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex (LUBAC), consisting of HOIL-1, HOIP and Sharpin. However, the mechanisms that regulate linear ubiquitination are still unknown. Here, we show that A20 is rapidly recruited to NEMO and LUBAC upon TNF stimulation and that A20 inhibits LUBAC-induced NF-κB activation via its C-terminal zinc-finger 7 (ZF7) domain. Expression of a polypeptide corresponding to only ZF7 was sufficient to inhibit TNF-induced NF-κB activation. Both A20 and ZF7 can form a complex with NEMO and LUBAC, and are able to prevent the TNF-induced binding of NEMO to LUBAC. Finally, we show that ZF7 preferentially binds linear polyubiquitin chains in vitro, indicating A20–ZF7 as a novel linear ubiquitin-binding domain (LUBID). We thus propose a model in which A20 inhibits TNF- and LUBAC-induced NF-κB signalling by binding to linear polyubiquitin chains via its seventh zinc finger, which prevents the TNF-induced interaction between LUBAC and NEMO.     

Mechanistic analysis of PCNA poly‐ubiquitylation by the ubiquitin protein ligases Rad18 and Rad5

Poly‐ubiquitylation is a common post‐translational modification that can impart various functions to a target protein. Several distinct mechanisms have been reported for the assembly of poly‐ubiquitin chains, involving either stepwise transfer of ubiquitin monomers or attachment of a preformed poly‐ubiquitin chain and requiring either a single pair of ubiquitin‐conjugating enzyme (E2) and ubiquitin ligase (E3), or alternatively combinations of different E2s and E3s. We have analysed the mechanism of poly‐ubiquitylation of the replication clamp PCNA by two cooperating E2–E3 pairs, Rad6–Rad18 and Ubc13–Mms2–Rad5. We find that the two complexes act sequentially and independently in chain initiation and stepwise elongation, respectively. While loading of PCNA onto DNA is essential for recognition by Rad6–Rad18, chain extension by Ubc13–Mms2–Rad5 is only slightly enhanced by loading. Moreover, in contrast to initiation, chain extension is tolerant to variations in the attachment site of the proximal ubiquitin moiety. Our results provide information about a unique conjugation mechanism that appears to be specialised for a regulatable pattern of dual modification.     

Crystal structures of Lys‐63‐linked tri‐ and di‐ubiquitin reveal a highly extended chain architecture

The covalent attachment of different types of poly‐ubiquitin chains signal different outcomes for the proteins so targeted. For example, a protein modified with Lys‐48‐linked poly‐ubiquitin chains is targeted for proteasomal degradation, whereas Lys‐63‐linked chains encode nondegradative signals. The structural features that enable these different types of chains to encode different signals have not yet been fully elucidated. We report here the X‐ray crystal structures of Lys‐63‐linked tri‐ and di‐ubiquitin at resolutions of 2.3 and 1.9 Å, respectively. The tri‐ and di‐ubiquitin species adopt essentially identical structures. In both instances, the ubiquitin chain assumes a highly extended conformation with a left‐handed helical twist; the helical chain contains four ubiquitin monomers per turn and has a repeat length of ～110 Å. Interestingly, Lys‐48 ubiquitin chains also adopt a left‐handed helical structure with a similar repeat length. However, the Lys‐63 architecture is much more open than that of Lys‐48 chains and exposes much more of the ubiquitin surface for potential recognition events. These new crystal structures are consistent with the results of solution studies of Lys‐63 chain conformation, and reveal the structural basis for differential recognition of Lys‐63 versus Lys‐48 chains. Proteins 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Cell cycle‐regulated ubiquitination of tankyrase 1 by RNF8 and ABRO1/BRCC36 controls the timing of sister telomere resolution

Timely resolution of sister chromatid cohesion in G2/M is essential for genome integrity. Resolution at telomeres requires the poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase tankyrase 1, but the mechanism that times its action is unknown. Here, we show that tankyrase 1 activity at telomeres is controlled by a ubiquitination/deubiquitination cycle depending on opposing ubiquitin ligase and deubiquitinase activities. In late S/G2 phase, the DNA damage‐responsive E3 ligase RNF8 conjugates K63‐linked ubiquitin chains to tankyrase 1, while in G1 phase such ubiquitin chains are removed by BRISC, an ABRO1/BRCC36‐containing deubiquitinase complex. We show that K63‐linked ubiquitin chains accumulate on tankyrase 1 in late S/G2 to promote its stabilization, association with telomeres, and resolution of cohesion. Timing of this posttranslational modification coincides with the ATM‐mediated DNA damage response that occurs on functional telomeres following replication in G2. Removal of ubiquitin chains is controlled by ABRO1/BRCC36 and occurs as cells exit mitosis and enter G1, ensuring that telomere cohesion is not resolved prematurely in S phase. Our studies suggest that a cell cycle‐regulated posttranslational mechanism couples resolution of telomere cohesion with completion of telomere replication to ensure genome integrity.     

Structural basis for specific recognition of Lys 63‐linked polyubiquitin chains by tandem UIMs of RAP80

RAP80 has a key role in the recruitment of the Abraxas–BRCC36–BRCA1–BARD1 complex to DNA‐damage foci for DNA repair through specific recognition of Lys 63‐linked polyubiquitinated proteins by its tandem ubiquitin‐interacting motifs (UIMs). Here, we report the crystal structure of the RAP80 tandem UIMs (RAP80‐UIM1‐UIM2) in complex with Lys 63‐linked di‐ubiquitin at 2.2 Å resolution. The two UIMs, UIM1 and UIM2, and the α‐helical inter‐UIM region together form a continuous 60 Å‐long α‐helix. UIM1 and UIM2 bind to the proximal and distal ubiquitin moieties, respectively. Both UIM1 and UIM2 of RAP80 recognize an Ile 44‐centered hydrophobic patch on ubiquitin but neither UIM interacts with the Lys 63‐linked isopeptide bond. Our structure suggests that the inter‐UIM region forms a 12 Å‐long α‐helix that ensures that the UIMs are arranged to enable specific binding of Lys 63‐linked di‐ubiquitin. This was confirmed by pull‐down analyses using RAP80‐UIM1‐UIM2 mutants of various length inter‐UIM regions. Further, we show that the Epsin1 tandem UIM, which has an inter‐UIM region similar to that of RAP80‐UIM1‐UIM2, also selectively binds Lys 63‐linked di‐ubiquitin.     

Analysis of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) essential modulator (NEMO) binding to linear and lysine-linked ubiquitin chains and its role in the activation of NF-κB

Nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) essential modulator (NEMO), a component of the inhibitor of κB kinase (IKK) complex, controls NF-κB signaling by binding to ubiquitin chains. Structural studies of NEMO provided a rationale for the specific binding between the UBAN (ubiquitin binding in ABIN and NEMO) domain of NEMO and linear (Met-1-linked) di-ubiquitin chains. Full-length NEMO can also interact with Lys-11-, Lys-48-, and Lys-63-linked ubiquitin chains of varying length in cells. Here, we show that purified full-length NEMO binds preferentially to linear ubiquitin chains in competition with lysine-linked ubiquitin chains of defined length, including long Lys-63-linked deca-ubiquitins. Linear di-ubiquitins were sufficient to activate both the IKK complex in vitro and to trigger maximal NF-κB activation in cells. In TNFα-stimulated cells, NEMO chimeras engineered to bind exclusively to Lys-63-linked ubiquitin chains mediated partial NF-κB activation compared with cells expressing NEMO that binds to linear ubiquitin chains. We propose that NEMO functions as a high affinity receptor for linear ubiquitin chains and a low affinity receptor for long lysine-linked ubiquitin chains. This phenomenon could explain quantitatively distinct NF-κB activation patterns in response to numerous cell stimuli.     

Lysine 63‐linked polyubiquitin chain may serve as a targeting signal for the 26S proteasome

Recruitment of substrates to the 26S proteasome usually requires covalent attachment of the Lys48‐linked polyubiquitin chain. In contrast, modifications with the Lys63‐linked polyubiquitin chain and/or monomeric ubiquitin are generally thought to function in proteasome‐independent cellular processes. Nevertheless, the ubiquitin chain‐type specificity for the proteasomal targeting is still poorly understood, especially in vivo. Using mass spectrometry, we found that Rsp5, a ubiquitin‐ligase in budding yeast, catalyzes the formation of Lys63‐linked ubiquitin chains in vitro. Interestingly, the 26S proteasome degraded well the Lys63‐linked ubiquitinated substrate in vitro. To examine whether Lys63‐linked ubiquitination serves in degradation in vivo, we investigated the ubiquitination of Mga2‐p120, a substrate of Rsp5. The polyubiquitinated p120 contained relatively high levels of Lys63‐linkages, and the Lys63‐linked chains were sufficient for the proteasome‐binding and subsequent p120‐processing. In addition, Lys63‐linked chains as well as Lys48‐linked chains were detected in the 26S proteasome‐bound polyubiquitinated proteins. These results raise the possibility that Lys63‐linked ubiquitin chain also serves as a targeting signal for the 26S proteaseome in vivo.     

Solution structure of the N‐terminal domain of DC‐UbP/UBTD2 and its interaction with ubiquitin

DC‐UbP/UBTD2 is a ubiquitin (Ub) domain‐containing protein first identified from dendritic cells, and is implicated in ubiquitination pathway. The solution structure and backbone dynamics of the C‐terminal Ub‐like (UbL) domain were elucidated in our previous work. To further understand the biological function of DC‐UbP, we then solved the solution structure of the N‐terminal domain of DC‐UbP (DC‐UbP_N) and studied its Ub binding properties by NMR techniques. The results show that DC‐UbP_N holds a novel structural fold and acts as a Ub‐binding domain (UBD) but with low affinity. This implies that the DC‐UbP protein, composing of a combination of both UbL and UBD domains, might play an important role in regulating protein ubiquitination and delivery of ubiquitinated substrates in eukaryotic cells.     

Dimeric Ube2g2 simultaneously engages donor and acceptor ubiquitins to form Lys48‐linked ubiquitin chains

Cellular adaptation to proteotoxic stress at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) depends on Lys48‐linked polyubiquitination by ER‐associated ubiquitin ligases (E3s) and subsequent elimination of ubiquitinated retrotranslocation products by the proteasome. The ER‐associated E3 gp78 ubiquitinates misfolded proteins by transferring preformed Lys48‐linked ubiquitin chains from the cognate E2 Ube2g2 to substrates. Here we demonstrate that Ube2g2 synthesizes linkage specific ubiquitin chains by forming an unprecedented homodimer: The dimerization of Ube2g2, mediated primarily by electrostatic interactions between two Ube2g2s, is also facilitated by the charged ubiquitin molecules. Mutagenesis studies show that Ube2g2 dimerization is required for ER‐associated degradation (ERAD). In addition to E2 dimerization, we show that a highly conserved arginine residue in the donor Ube2g2 senses the presence of an aspartate in the acceptor ubiquitin to position only Lys48 of ubiquitin in proximity to the donor E2 active site. These results reveal an unanticipated mode of E2 self‐association that allows the E2 to effectively engage two ubiquitins to specifically synthesize Lys48‐linked ubiquitin chains.     

Structural and functional studies of USP20 ZnF‐UBP domain by NMR

Deubiquitinase USP20/VDU2 has been demonstrated to play important roles in multiple cellular processes by controlling the life span of substrate proteins including hypoxia‐inducible factor HIF1α, and so forth. USP20 contains four distinct structural domains including the N‐terminal zinc‐finger ubiquitin binding domain (ZnF‐UBP), the catalytic domain (USP domain), and two tandem DUSP domains, and none of the structures for these four domains has been solved. Meanwhile, except for the ZnF‐UBP domain, the biological functions for USP20's catalytic domain and tandem DUSP domains have been at least partially clarified. Here in this study, we determined the solution structure of USP20 ZnF‐UBP domain and investigated its binding properties with mono‐ubiquitin and poly‐ubiquitin (K48‐linked di‐ubiquitin) by using NMR and molecular modeling techniques. USP20's ZnF‐UBP domain forms a spherically shaped fold consisting of a central β‐sheet with either one α‐helix or two α‐helices packed on each side of the sheet. However, although having formed a canonical core structure essential for ubiquitin recognition, USP20 ZnF‐UBP presents weak ubiquitin binding capacity. The structural basis for understanding USP20 ZnF‐UBP's ubiquitin binding capacity was revealed by NMR data‐driven docking. Although the electrostatic interactions between D264 of USP5 (E87 in USP20 ZnF‐UBP) and R74 of ubiquitin are kept, the loss of the extensive interactions formed between ubiquitin's di‐glycine motif and the conserved and non‐conserved residues of USP20 ZnF‐UBP domain (W41, E55, and Y84) causes a significant decrease in its binding affinity to ubiquitin. Our findings indicate that USP20 ZnF‐UBP domain might have a physiological role unrelated to its ubiquitin binding capacity.     

Crystal structure of the UBR‐box from UBR6/FBXO11 reveals domain swapping mediated by zinc binding

The UBR‐box is a 70‐residue zinc finger domain present in the UBR family of E3 ubiquitin ligases that directly binds N‐terminal degradation signals in substrate proteins. UBR6, also called FBXO11, is an UBR‐box containing E3 ubiquitin ligase that does not bind N‐terminal signals. Here, we present the crystal structure of the UBR‐box domain from human UBR6. The dimeric crystal structure reveals a unique form of domain swapping mediated by zinc coordination, where three independent protein chains come together to regenerate the topology of the monomeric UBR‐box fold. Analysis of the structure suggests that the absence of N‐terminal residue binding arises from the lack of an amino acid binding pocket.     

Efficient Internalization of MHC I Requires Lysine‐11 and Lysine‐63 Mixed Linkage Polyubiquitin Chains

The downregulation of cell surface receptors by endocytosis is a fundamental requirement for the termination of signalling responses and ubiquitination is a critical regulatory step in receptor regulation. The K5 gene product of Kaposi's sarcoma‐associated herpesvirus is an E3 ligase that ubiquitinates and downregulates several cell surface immunoreceptors, including major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules. Here, we show that K5 targets the membrane proximal lysine of MHC I for conjugation with mixed linkage polyubiquitin chains. Quantitative mass spectrometry revealed an increase in lysine‐11, as well as lysine‐63, linked polyubiquitin chains on MHC I in K5‐expressing cells. Using a combination of mutant ubiquitins and MHC I molecules expressing a single cytosolic lysine residue, we confirm a functional role for lysines‐11 and ‐63 in K5‐mediated MHC I endocytosis. We show that lysine‐11 linkages are important for receptor endocytosis, and that complex mixed linkage polyubiquitin chains are generated in vivo.