Contextual analysis and intermediate cell markers enhance high-resolution cell image analysis for automated cervical smear diagnosis.

Until now, efforts to automate cervical smear diagnosis have focused on analyzing features of individual cells. In a complex specimen such as that obtained from a cervical scrape, diagnostically significant cells may not be adequately represented or may elude detection by the automated technology. An approach is needed that extracts additional quantitative information from cervical smears beyond what the cell-by-cell approach can provide. A new methodology, contextual analysis, was developed to extract global quantitative information about cells, cell clusters, and background debris. This pilot study was designed to compare the efficacy of contextual analysis with high-resolution, single cell analysis and the analysis of intermediate cell markers. Thirty-four samples prepared as monolayers and stained with the Feulgen-Thionin/Congo Red stain were measured. Contextual analysis alone was able to classify 91% of the smears correctly; single cell analysis classified 94% of the cells correctly; and the intermediate cell analysis correctly identified the smear diagnosis for 84% of the cells. When all three analysis methods were combined into a simple smear level classifier, the overall smear classification accuracy was improved over those obtained using the three methodologies alone.     

The cervical smear test: does timing have an effect on sample adequacy?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of timing of the cervical smear test on sample adequacy. METHODS: Inadequate and negative smears from pre-menopausal women, with a regular menstrual cycle and who were not undertaking any hormone therapy, were selected and re-screened. The inadequate smears were then categorized according to the reasons for the inadequate result. The time of the cycle that the smear was taken was recorded for both inadequate and negative smears. The expected frequency of smears per phase was compared with the observed frequency per phase using the chi-squared statistical test. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the overall observed and expected rate of the inadequate smears of nine general practitioner (GP) practices (P = 0.886), of GP practice 4 (lowest inadequate rate) (P = 0.610), or GP practice 6 (highest inadequate rate) (P = 0.621) at any phase of the cycle. CONCLUSION: Results show that there is no optimum phase for adequate sample collection, therefore it is suggested that there is no effect of timing of the cervical smear test on sample adequacy, that timing is not a relevant factor in reducing the inadequate smear rate, and restricting smear taking to mid-cycle is unnecessary. (The information regarding last menstrual period/length of cycle from which these conclusions were reached relied upon the accuracy of patient information given to the smear taker.).     

Cell block as an adjunct to conventional Papanicolaou smear for diagnosis of cervical cancer in resource-limited settings

OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of indigenously prepared cell blocks (CBs) as an adjunct to a conventional smear test in providing a reliable diagnosis of clinically suspicious cervical cancer in resource-limited settings. METHODS: Eighty-six clinically suspicious cervical cancer cases underwent a conventional smear test, CB preparation from residual cellular samples and biopsies at the same sitting. Correlations were performed between these modalities in order to derive the sensitivity and specificity of the CB technique to diagnose cervical cancer. OBSERVATION & RESULTS: Out of 86 clinically suspicious cervical cancers, 72 (83.7%), 70 (81.4%) and 67 (77.9%) cases were diagnosed as malignant on tissue biopsies, CBs and smears respectively. CB-biopsy agreement in the diagnosis of malignancy was feasible in 87.5% of the cases while CB-Pap smear agreement was feasible in 92.5% of the cases. Sensitivity and specificity of CB preparation to diagnose malignancy was 92.5% and 100%, respectively, when the smear was taken as the reference test (excluding the unsatisfactory smears). When biopsy was taken as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of CBs were 87.5% and 100% respectively (excluding the unsatisfactory biopsies). In 8/19 cases where the smear diagnoses were either unsatisfactory or atypical squamous cells/atypical glandular cells, CBs picked up malignant lesions. CONCLUSION: CBs prepared from the residual cellular sample of conventional cervical scrapes augment the sensitivity of the smear test. When used as an adjunct to the smear, CBs aid in providing a reliable diagnosis of cervical cancer in the majority of the clinically suspected cases and thus the biopsy load can be reduced significantly in resource-poor settings.     

The Irrigation Smear—A New Cytodiagnostic Technique for the Detection of Cancer of the Uterine Cervix

Using the Davis cytopipette, cytologic smears were prepared from 2014 patients; 1367 of these specimens were obtained by the patients themselves. The series included 57 cases of carcinoma or atypia of the cervix, and 50 (88%) of these cases were found to have abnormal cells in the irrigation smear.Cytopipette samples were obtained by a nurse from 647 Eskimos, but cell preservation in this group was not satisfactory because of a delay of several weeks in preparing the smears. Accurate results depend also on specific training of the personnel reading the smears because fewer cells may be present in these smears than in cervical scrape smears.The irrigation smear is recommended as a reasonably accurate method of screening women for cancer of the cervix if they are not being examined regularly by the cervical scrape method. Hospital admissions of females may be a fruitful source of such cases.     

Relationship between the diagnosis of epithelial abnormalities and the composition of cervical smears

The significance of endocervical columnar cells as a high-quality parameter of cervical smears was studied. In a cohort of women with two successive screenings, the consistency of the cellular composition of the cervical smears and the relation between the cellular composition of the smears and the frequency of the diagnosis of abnormal epithelial changes was investigated. At the first screening, a significantly higher number of epithelial abnormalities was found in smears with endocervical columnar cells than in smears without endocervical columnar cells. A significantly higher number of abnormal epithelial changes was found on the second screening in smears from women whose smears from the first screening did not contain endocervical columnar cells than in smears from women whose smears from the first screening did contain endocervical columnar cells. The presence of endocervical cells should be considered a very important indicator of the quality of cervical smears. The chance of missing an abnormal epithelial change is increased in smears without endocervical columnar cells. When endocervical columnar cells are absent, the smear should be considered to be of unreliable quality and a repeat smear should be taken after a short interval, unless the absence of columnar cells can be satisfactorily explained.     

Review of cervical smears from 76 women with invasive cervical cancer: cytological findings and medicolegal implications

OBJECTIVE: To review cervical smears from 76 women which were taken prior to the diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer and to determine the appropriateness of the cytology reports issued on the smears. METHODS: Cervical smears, clinical records, cervical smear history and cytology reports from 76 women with invasive cervical cancer were reviewed. After microscopic review of the cervical smears, the cases were divided into two groups: Group 1 comprised 50 women who were found to have had at least one false-negative (F/N) smear report prior to the diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer. Group 2 comprised 26 women for whom no evidence of F/N reporting was found. RESULTS: A total of 209 cervical smears from the 50 women in group 1 were available for review (range 2-12 smears per woman); 100 of the 209 smears were considered to have been reported appropriately. Ninety-seven smears which had been reported originally as negative or inadequate were found, on review, to contain numerous severely dyskaryotic cells and were reclassified as F/N smears. All of the 50 women had at least one F/N smear and 29 had two or more. Twelve smears from eight women contained only a few (<200 severely dyskaryotic cells). Forty women developed invasive squamous carcinoma and 10 developed invasive adenocarcinoma. The stage at diagnosis ranged from 1A to stage 4. Seventy-one smears from the 24 women in group 2 were available for review (range 1-15 smears per woman). In two cases included in group 2, no smears were provided for review as the smears had been lost or mislaid. Review of the 71 smears confirmed the accuracy of the original cytological classification of the smear. Nineteen women were diagnosed with squamous cancer, two microinvasive cancer, one glassy cell, two adenocarcinomas, and one with adenosquamous carcinoma. One women was found to have an embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the corpus uteri involving the cervix. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The medicolegal implications are discussed in the light of the above findings. Evidence of breach of duty of care was presented in all 50 cases in group I although causation was not established in every case. There was no evidence of failure of duty of care in terms of the standard of the cervical cytology reports issued or standard of clinical management in 17 of the 26 cases in group 2. However, in seven of the 26 cases in group 2, clinical management of the case was substandard due to failure to investigate symptoms of irregular bleeding regardless of a negative cytology report (two cases), failure to act upon a suspicious smear report or consecutive inadequate smear reports (two cases), failure of follow-up after treatment of CIN3 (two cases) and histological misdiagnosis (one case).     

Accuracy of thin-layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of thin-layer cytology with Autocyte PREP (TriPath Imaging Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) with conventional smears in 500 women undergoing cervical cone biopsy. STUDY DESIGN: The study was performed among 500 consecutive women presenting for cone biopsy for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on biopsy in 350 (70%) and discrepant cytology/colpohistology in 150 (30%). Before performing a cone biopsy, two cervical samples were collected for conventional smears and thin-layer cytologic slides, with randomization of the order. Conventional smears were stained and diagnosed at Pasteur Cerba, while thin-layer cytologic slides were processed at a local TriPath office (Meylan, France) and sent in a masked fashion for screening at Pasteur Cerba. Any slides initially read as normal were reviewed again and reported without knowledge of the other cytologic or cone biopsy data. The final cytologic diagnoses for the two methods were compared with histopathology of the cone biopsy. RESULTS: The conventional smear was unsatisfactory in 58 (11.6%) of cases, while there were 4 (0.8%) unsatisfactory thin-layer cytologic slides (P < .001). Endocervical cells were missing from 31 (6.2%) of conventional smears and 34 (6.8%) of thin-layer cytologic slides. For the pooled data, sensitivities of conventional smear and thin layer for detecting high grade CIN (0.82% and 0.86%, respectively) were similar as were specificities (0.40% and 0.43%, respectively). When first samples were compared, the sensitivities of the conventional smear and thin layer for high grade CIN were 0.79% and 0.89%, respectively (P = .02), with corresponding specificities of 0.41% and 0.36% (P < .01). CONCLUSION: When controlled for sample order, the sensitivity of thin-layer cytology for detecting high grade CIN was significantly higher than that of conventional smears in patients with previous abnormal cytology, but at the expense of specificity.     

Fine needle aspiration cytology diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis in a 6-month-old child: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Skin biopsy and scrape smear examination are the two most commonly employed investigatory techniques in the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Although cases Leishmania lymphadenitis are reliably diagnosed with fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology, it has not attained popularity in the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis, and only a few reports are available. CASE: A 6-month-old Kuwaiti child presented with a skin lesion on her left forearm of five months' duration. Both scrape smears and FNA were performed from the lesion. FNA cytology smears showed a rich population of inflammatory cells predominating in lymphocytes and histiocytes and epithelioid cell granulomas. The amastigote forms of Leishmania were noted on the smears. The scrape smears were nondiagnostic. CONCLUSION: FNA cytology can be reliably used in the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis, especially in dry lesions, where scrape smears are likely to be nondiagnostic.     

Nuclear grooves in intermediate cells in cervical smears

One thousand cervical smears from women who took part in a hospital-based screening programme for early detection of cervical cancer were studied for the presence of nuclear grooves. Grooved nuclei were frequently detected in intermediate cells in all phases of the menstrual cycle, although their frequency of occurrence was slightly lower in the luteal and premenstrual phases. The mean number of nuclear grooves varied from 3.6 to 4.2 in different phases of the menstrual cycle. The differences, however, were not statistically significant. The presence of nuclear grooves in cervical cells appears to be a nonspecific finding at present.     

Performance of a new, liquid-based cervical screening technique in the clinical setting of a large French laboratory

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of liquid-based cytology with the CYTO-screen System (SEROA) with that of conventional smears through a secondary analysis of a large database covering the activity of an independent French laboratory during the period 1998-2002. STUDY DESIGN: The study was performed with a retrospective, comparative, historical design on 2 subgroups of women having been screened by gynecologists who switched from conventional smears to the CYTO-screen System in the period 1998-2002. The first cohort population consisted of women who had at least 4 subsequent screening tests over the period with half conventional and half with the CYTO-screen System. A control group consisted of smears collected by gynecologists who fully maintained activity with a conventional method over the same period. The second group consisted of women who had their first screening test performed over the study period by gynecologists who modified their technique. Specimen adequacy, endocervical cell content and epithelial cell abnormality detection rates were compared between the groups. RESULTS: As compared with the conventional smear, the CYTO-screen System showed a reduction in unsatisfactory reports, especially in the second group of first-screened (0.14% versus 1.3%, P < .0001). The rate of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance increased significantly after the switch to the CYTO-screen System (2.5% versus 1.3%, P = .004) and in the second group of first-screened women (2.05% versus 1.4%, P = .0014), with higher histologic confirmation in both situations. There was a non-significant increase in the detection rates of low and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions after the switch to the CYTO-screen System and in the second group of first-screened women. CONCLUSION: The CYTO-screen System gives higher-quality specimens and has a higher detection rate for squamous intraepithelial lesions, but that rate was significant only for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.     

Effect of circulation and discussion of cervical smears on agreement between laboratories

The study objective was assessing whether circulation of smears and discussion of those with differing interpretation can increase reproducibility between laboratories. The study included: the blind interpretation of a first set of 194 smears among seven laboratories, the discussion of smears with discrepant diagnoses during the previous phase and the blind interpretation of a second set of smears of same size and characteristics. After discussions, the overall weighted kappa increased in five laboratories (substantially in three : +50%, +27% and +20%). However, no change was observed in one laboratory and a slight decrease (-4%) in another. The latter interpreted the second set of smears at a longer time interval from discussions. Agreement improved for all diagnostic classes except low grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LSIL). Overall, the intervention increased diagnostic agreement, but its effect varied with laboratory and by diagnostic class and could be transient. Continued programmes of smear exchange and discussion appear to be advisable.     

DNA quantification is technically feasible and of value in cervical smear samples: possible applications for determination of progression in low grade dyskaryosis

This study evaluates the feasibility of DNA analysis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III (CIN III) lesions on cervical smear and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue (FFPET) blocks with a view to extending this type of analysis to milder grades of dyskaryosis. DNA ploidy was determined by image analysis using a CAS 200 Image Analyser. Seventeen patients with a diagnosis of CIN III were studied. Results show that all smear and tissue samples were non-diploid with nine aneuploid and eight tetraploid lesions. In 6/7 patients whose smears and corresponding biopsies were examined there was complete agreement as to the DNA profile. We conclude that DNA quantification is technically feasible in archival, routinely prepared cervical smears. This technique should now be applied to CINI and CINII cervical smears to determine if it is of value in identifying those lesions that will progress to CIN III. This study is particularly timely with the possibility in the near future of estimation of ploidy by image analysis using instruments such as the Highly Optimized Microscope Environment (HOME) system.     

The efficiency of the Cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells in cervical smears

In 30 patients whose last cervical smear had lacked endocervical cells, two new samples were collected, one with a cotton-tipped applicator and the other with the recently developed Cytobrush cervical brush. With the cotton swab, no endocervical cells were present in the repeat smears of 21 patients, as compared with only 3 Cytobrush smears lacking endocervical cells; the difference is statistically significant (P less than .001). Quantitatively, the cellular yield with the Cytobrush was larger. It is concluded that the use of the cervical brush to collect material for cervical smears is more effective and provides a higher yield of cells than the use of the conventional cotton swab. The importance of the presence of endocervical cells in a smear as evidence that the transformation zone has been properly sampled is also discussed.     

Cervex brush versus vaginal–cervical–endocervical (VCE) triple smear techniques in cervical sampling

Cervex brush versus vaginal–cervical–endocervical (VCE) triple smear techniques in cervical sampling
Cervex brush sampling was compared with the conventional triple vaginal–cervical–endocervical (VCE) smear technique. Nine hundred and fifty‐nine Cervex brush smears and 1064 VCE smears were studied. All smears with both methods were technically satisfactory for evaluation. Endocervical cells were found in 90.7% and metaplastic cells in 73.3% of Cervex brush samples and in 92.5% and 64.1% of VCE samples, respectively. There were significantly more metaplastic cells in smears from premenopausal women. Low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) was found in three Cervex brush samples and in two VCE samples. High‐grade SIL was found only in one Cervex brush sample. Benign cellular changes were found in 142 Cervex brush samples and in 144 VCE samples. Sampling with the Cervex brush is efficient, simple and fast and gives high quality cervical smears for cytological evaluation.     

Collagen balls in cervical smears. A previously undescribed finding

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate several conventional cervical smears obtained from women undergoing routine screening for cervical dysplasia or carcinoma and whose smears contained structures resembling collagen balls. STUDY DESIGN: Between 1995 and 1998, cervical smears containing collagen balls were analyzed. The clinical histories of the patients whose smears contained collagen balls, including the gestational history, were reviewed. Histopathologic material from any related surgical specimens was reviewed, with special attention to mesothelial surfaces. RESULTS: Collagen balls were found in 5 of 77,891 Pap smears examined (0.006%). None of the patients had evidence of neoplasms of the genital tract. One of the patients was in the first trimester of pregnancy. CONCLUSION: We suggest that collagen balls in cervical smear originate in mesothelium-covered organs, from where they are transported via the fallopian tubes into the uterine cavity. Their significance lies in their being mistaken for mucin-distended cells exfoliated from a neoplasm or from detached fragments of a papillary ovarian neoplasm.     

Evaluation of p16INK4a in cervical lesion of premenopausal and postmenopausal women

Pap smears of postmenopausal women are often misdiagnosed because of the difficulty in distinguishing atrophic epithelial cells groups only by morphological criteria. In this study we investigated the diagnostic application of immunocytochemical staining of p16INK4a on conventional Pap smear. A total of 137 cervical specimens were enrolled in this study, of which 77 and 60 cervical smears were taken from premenopausal and postmenopausal women, respectively. Two cervical smears were taken simultaneously in 68 women, one for conventional cytology and the other for immunostaining. Additional 69 cervical smears were taken from the archive, decolorized and then used for immunostaining. In premenopausal women 1 out of 14 (7.1%) with negative cytology, 7 out of 24 (29.2%) with low grade squamous intra-epithelial lesion (LSIL), all 35 (100%) with high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and all 4 (100%) with squamous cell carcinoma (confirmed by histopathology) had positive staining to p16INK4a. In postmenopausal women p16INK4a positivity was observed in 4 out of 7 (57.1%) cases of LSIL, 12 out of 14 (85.7%) cases of HSIL and all 4 out of 5 (80%) different cases of carcinoma (1 cervical adenosquamous carcinoma and 3 cervical squamous cell carcinoma in situ confirmed by histopathology), but none of 34 smears with normal cytology. Twenty smears with normal cytology chosen for the negative control in this study were from the group of postmenopausal women and were as expected negative for p16INK4a immunostaining. In the group of postmenopausal women, 16 out of 60 (26.7%) cases the cytological diagnosis was established on the basis of pl6lNK4a immunostaining as being HSIL. From our preliminary study on a limited number of samples, we can however conclude that pl6INK4a immunostaining is a very useful tool for cytological diagnosis enabling to distinguish HSIL from normal, reactive or inflammatory changes.     

Follow up of women with a history of mildly abnormal cervical smears which have returned to normal without treatment

The progress of 124 women with at least two negative cervical smears following a history of mildly abnormal smears for which no treatment had been given was compared with 106 women with negative smears and a clinical history of genital warts or herpes virus infection and 460 age-matched controls. After 4 years, excluding those for whom there was no follow up, 5.8% of those with a history of abnormal smears, none of those with a clinical history of genital warts or herpes virus and 1.1% of controls had developed histological evidence of at least cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III (CINIII) when referred for investigation of subsequent abnormal smears; one woman, from the control group, had developed invasive cervical cancer. Women with two negative smears after a history of abnormal smears who subsequently developed CINIII were more likely to have had a previous smear reported as moderate or mild-moderate dyskaryosis (2/6) compared with those whose follow up was negative (2/89). the results suggest that two negative cervical smears may not necessarily indicate that a lesion has regressed, but that a clinical history of genital warts or herpes virus infection should not be an indication for increased surveillance.     

Quinquennial cervical smears: every woman's right and every general practitioner's responsibility.

Out of 558 women aged 16 to 64 who were registered with one general practitioner, 459 were eligible to be screened for cervical cancer. Even though the practice had been taking cervical smears for many years, they were predominantly from women under 35. Of the eligible women between 35 and 64, 111 (37%) had never had a smear. After short term intensive screening the uptake rates, defined by a smear done within the past five years, rose to 100% for women under 35, 94% for those aged 35 to 64, and 96% for all eligible women. Screening was rewarding both in its clinical yield and in the income generated by item of service payment. The success of screening was largely due to the participation of practice nurses in taking smears, and to a new method of recording smear results and claims for them. Some women, however, refused to have cervical smears.     

Controlled trial of a new cervical spatula.

A wooden spatula was designed to scrape the varied distribution of epithelial abnormalities of the cervix as seen at colposcopy. The efficiency of the spatula in obtaining dyskaryotic cells and improving the cellular quality of smears was compared with that of the Ayre spatula in a controlled trial. More than 17,000 smears were taken from women aged 14-86 years by more than 200 smear takers from 74 centres. Twenty two per cent more dyskaryotic smears were obtained with the trial spatula, and the cellular quality of the smears was improved in all age groups. Although it was associated with a slightly increased risk of bleeding, 83% of users preferred the trial spatula.     

Management of women with mild and moderate cervical dyskaryosis.

OBJECTIVE--To compare the outcomes in women with mild and moderate dyskaryosis after increasing periods of surveillance and thereby to define a rational protocol for managing such women. DESIGN--Prospective study with randomisation of women to one of four treatment groups, each with a different period of surveillance; one group in which the women were given immediate treatment and three other groups in which the women were under surveillance for six, 12, and 24 months. SETTING--A dedicated colposcopy clinic in Aberdeen, Scotland. SUBJECTS--902 women who presented with a mildly or moderately dyskaryotic smear for the first time. INTERVENTIONS--Cytological and colposcopic examinations at intervals of six months until the allocated period of surveillance was completed, at which time biopsy was performed. Women with severe dyskaryosis were withdrawn from surveillance and a biopsy was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--The histological findings after punch biopsy or large loop excision of the transformation zone, and the trends in cytological appearances of serial cervical smears. RESULTS--793 women completed the study. In all, 769 women had an adequate final smear, of which 197 were normal cytologically, 328 were still mildly or moderately dyskaryotic, and 244 were severely dyskaryotic. Seventeen of the 67 (25%) women with one repeat smear showing non-dyskaryosis had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III compared with only one of the 31 (3%) women with no dyskaryosis in four repeat cervical smears (P < 0.0001). None of the women had invasive cancer. Of 158 women whose index smear showed mild dyskaryosis and who were allocated to the group under surveillance for two years, only 40 had not defaulted or still had dyskaryotic smears by the end of the two years. CONCLUSION--Cytological surveillance, although safe, is not an efficient strategy for managing women with mildly abnormal smears. Women with any degree of dyskaryosis in a smear should be referred for colposcopy.