Functional expression and sites of gene transcription of a novel α subunit of the GABAA receptor in rat brain

Two α subunits of the gabaa receptor in rat brain have been identified by molecular cloning. The deduced polypeptide sequences share major characteristics with other chemically gated ion channel proteins. One polypeptide represents the rat homologue of the α3 subunit previously cloned from bovine brain [14], while the other polypeptide is a yet unknown subunit, termed α5. When coexpressed with the β1 subunit in Xenopus oocytes the receptors containing the α5 subunit revealed a higher sensitivity to GABA than receptors expressed from α1 + β1 subunits or α3 + β1 subunits (K_a = 1 μM, 13 μM and 14 μM, respectively). The α5 subunit was expressed only in a few brain areas such as cerebral cortex, hippocampal formation and olfactory bulb granular layer as shown by in situ hybridization histochemistry. Since the mRNA of the α5 subunit was colocalized with the αl and α3 subunits only in cerebral cortex and in the hippocampal formation the α5 subunit may be part of distinct GABA_A receptors in neuronal populations within the olfactory bulb.     

Molecular determinants of desensitization and assembly of the chimeric GABA(A) receptor subunits (alpha1/gamma2) and (gamma2/alpha1) in combinations with beta2 and gamma2

Two gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) (GABA(A)) receptor chimeras were designed in order to elucidate the structural requirements for GABA(A) receptor desensitization and assembly. The (alpha1/gamma2) and (gamma2/alpha1) chimeric subunits representing the extracellular N-terminal domain of alpha1 or gamma2 and the remainder of the gamma2 or alpha1 subunits, respectively, were expressed with beta2 and beta2gamma2 in Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf-9) cells using the baculovirus expression system. The (alpha1/gamma2)beta2 and (alpha1/gamma2)beta2gamma2 but not the (gamma2/alpha1)beta2 and (gamma2/alpha1)beta2gamma2 subunit combinations formed functional receptor complexes as shown by whole-cell patch-clamp recordings and [3H]muscimol and [3H]flunitrazepam binding. Moreover, the surface immunofluorescence staining of Sf-9 cells expressing the (alpha1/gamma2)-containing receptors was pronounced, as opposed to the staining of the (gamma2/alpha1)-containing receptors, which was only slightly higher than background. To explain this, the (alpha1/gamma2) and (gamma2/alpha1) chimeras may act like alpha1 and gamma2 subunits, respectively, indicating that the extracellular N-terminal segment is important for assembly. However, the (alpha1/gamma2) chimeric subunit had characteristics different from the alpha1 subunit, since the (alpha1/gamma2) chimera gave rise to no desensitization after GABA stimulation in whole-cell patch-clamp recordings, which was independent of whether the chimera was expressed in combination with beta2 or beta2gamma2. Surprisingly, the (alpha1/gamma2)(gamma2/alpha1)beta2 subunit combination did desensitize, indicating that the C-terminal segment of the alpha1 subunit may be important for desensitization. Moreover, desensitization was observed for the (alpha1/gamma2)beta2gamma2 receptor with respect to the direct activation by pentobarbital. This suggests differences in the mechanism of channel activation for pentobarbital and GABA.     

Mapping of the α4 subunit gene (GABRA4) to human chromosome 4 defines an α2—α4—β1—γ1 gene cluster: further evidence that modern GABAA receptor gene clusters are derived from an ancestral cluster

We demonstrated previously that an α₁—β₂—γ₂ gene cluster of the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA_A) receptor is located on human chromosome 5q34–q35 and that an ancestral α—β—γ gene cluster probably spawned clusters on chromosomes 4, 5, and 15. Here, we report that the α₄ gene (GABRA4) maps to human chromosome 4p14–q12, defining a cluster comprising the α₂, α₄, β₁, and γ₁ genes. The existence of an α₂—α₄—β₁—γ₁ cluster on chromosome 4 and an α₁—α₆—β₂—γ₂ cluster on chromosome 5 provides further evidence that the number of ancestral GABA_A receptor subunit genes has been expanded by duplication within an ancestral gene cluster. Moreover, if duplication of the α gene occurred before duplication of the ancestral gene cluster, then a heretofore undiscovered subtype of α subunit should be located on human chromosome 15q11–q13 within an α₅—α_x—β₃—γ₃ gene cluster at the locus for Angelman and Prader—Willi syndromes.     

Mapping of the β2 Subunit Gene (GABRB2) to Microdissected Human Chromosome 5q34-q35 Defines a Gene Cluster for the Most Abundant GABAA Receptor Isoform

The γ-aminobutyric acid receptor (GABA_AR) is a multisubunit C1 channel that mediates most fast inhibitory synaptic transmission in the central nervous system. Molecular evolution has given rise to many genetic variants of GABA_AR subunits, including α_1-6, β_1-4, γ_1-4, δ, and ρ_1-2, suggesting that an enormous number of combinations of subunits are possible. Here we report that the β₂ gene is located on chromosome 5q34-q35, defining a cluster comprising α₁ β₂, and γ₂ genes that together code for the most abundant GABA_AR isoform. The fact that intron position is conserved in the β_1-1 genes, taken together with the observation that chromosomes 4 and 15 also contain distinct α-β-γ gene clusters, strongly suggests that an ancestral α-β-γ cluster was duplicated and translocated to at least two different chromosomes. This organization of GABA_AR gene clusters may have been preserved as linkage provides a mechanism for facilitating coordinate gene expression.     

Assembly,trafficking and function of α1β2γ2 GABAA receptors are regulated by N‐terminal regions,in a subunit‐specific manner

GABA_A receptors are pentameric ligand‐gated ion channels that mediate inhibitory fast synaptic transmission in the central nervous system. Consistent with recent pentameric ligand‐gated ion channels structures, sequence analysis predicts an α‐helix near the N‐terminus of each GABA_A receptor subunit. Preceding each α‐helix are 8–36 additional residues, which we term the N‐terminal extension. In homomeric GABA_C receptors and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, the N‐terminal α‐helix is functionally essential. Here, we determined the role of the N‐terminal extension and putative α‐helix in heteromeric α1β2γ2 GABA_A receptors. This role was most prominent in the α1 subunit, with deletion of the N‐terminal extension or further deletion of the putative α‐helix both dramatically reduced the number of functional receptors at the cell surface. Conversely, deletion of the β2 or γ2 N‐terminal extension had little effect on the number of functional cell surface receptors. Additional deletion of the putative α‐helix in the β2 or γ2 subunits did, however, decrease both functional cell surface receptors and incorporation of the γ2 subunit into mature receptors. In the β2 subunit only, α‐helix deletions affected GABA sensitivity and desensitization. Our findings demonstrate that N‐terminal extensions and α‐helices make key subunit‐specific contributions to assembly, consistent with both regions being involved in inter‐subunit interactions.

     

Human α1β3γ2L gamma‐aminobutyric acid type A receptors: High‐level production and purification in a functional state

Gamma‐aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABA_ARs) are the most important inhibitory chloride ion channels in the central nervous system and are major targets for a wide variety of drugs. The subunit compositions of GABA_ARs determine their function and pharmacological profile. GABA_ARs are heteropentamers of subunits, and (α1)₂(β3)₂(γ2L)₁ is a common subtype. Biochemical and biophysical studies of GABA_ARs require larger quantities of receptors of defined subunit composition than are currently available. We previously reported high‐level production of active human α1β3 GABA_AR using tetracycline‐inducible stable HEK293 cells. Here we extend the strategy to receptors containing three different subunits. We constructed a stable tetracycline‐inducible HEK293‐TetR cell line expressing human (N)–FLAG–α1β3γ2L–(C)–(GGS)₃GK–1D4 GABA_AR. These cells achieved expression levels of 70–90 pmol [³H]muscimol binding sites/15‐cm plate at a specific activity of 15–30 pmol/mg of membrane protein. Incorporation of the γ2 subunit was confirmed by the ratio of [³H]flunitrazepam to [³H]muscimol binding sites and sensitivity of GABA‐induced currents to benzodiazepines and zinc. The α1β3γ2L GABA_ARs were solubilized in dodecyl‐d ‐maltoside, purified by anti‐FLAG affinity chromatography and reconstituted in CHAPS/asolectin at an overall yield of ～30%. Typical purifications yielded 1.0–1.5 nmoles of [³H]muscimol binding sites/60 plates. Receptors with similar properties could be purified by 1D4 affinity chromatography with lower overall yield. The composition of the purified, reconstituted receptors was confirmed by ligand binding, Western blot, and proteomics. Allosteric interactions between etomidate and [³H]muscimol binding were maintained in the purified state.     

Complex Role of Collybistin and Gephyrin in GABAA Receptor Clustering

Gephyrin and collybistin are key components of GABA_A receptor (GABA_AR) clustering. Nonetheless, resolving the molecular interactions between the plethora of GABA_AR subunits and these clustering proteins is a significant challenge. We report a direct interaction of GABA_AR α2 and α3 subunit intracellular M3–M4 domain (but not α1, α4, α5, α6, β1–3, or γ1–3) with gephyrin. Curiously, GABA_AR α2, but not α3, binds to both gephyrin and collybistin using overlapping sites. The reciprocal binding sites on gephyrin for collybistin and GABA_AR α2 also overlap at the start of the gephyrin E domain. This suggests that although GABA_AR α3 interacts with gephyrin, GABA_AR α2, collybistin, and gephyrin form a trimeric complex. In support of this proposal, tri-hybrid interactions between GABA_AR α2 and collybistin or GABA_AR α2 and gephyrin are strengthened in the presence of gephyrin or collybistin, respectively. Collybistin and gephyrin also compete for binding to GABA_AR α2 in co-immunoprecipitation experiments and co-localize in transfected cells in both intracellular and submembrane aggregates. Interestingly, GABA_AR α2 is capable of “activating ” collybistin isoforms harboring the regulatory SH3 domain, enabling targeting of gephyrin to the submembrane aggregates. The GABA_AR α2-collybistin interaction was disrupted by a pathogenic mutation in the collybistin SH3 domain (p.G55A) that causes X-linked intellectual disability and seizures by disrupting GABA_AR and gephyrin clustering. Because immunohistochemistry in retina revealed a preferential co-localization of collybistin with α2 subunit containing GABA_ARs, but not GlyRs or other GABA_AR subtypes, we propose that the collybistin-gephyrin complex has an intimate role in the clustering of GABA_ARs containing the α2 subunit.     

Brain regional distribution of GABAA receptors exhibiting atypical GABA agonism: Roles of receptor subunits

The major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), has only partial efficacy at certain subtypes of GABA_A receptors. To characterize these minor receptor populations in rat and mouse brains, we used autoradiographic imaging of t-butylbicyclophosphoro[³⁵S]thionate ([³⁵S]TBPS) binding to GABA_A receptors in brain sections and compared the displacing capacities of 10 mM GABA and 1 mM 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxazolo[5,4-c]pyridin-3-ol (THIP), a competitive GABA-site agonist. Brains from GABA_A receptor α1, α4, δ, and α4 + δ subunit knockout (KO) mouse lines were used to understand the contribution of these particular receptor subunits to “GABA-insensitive” (GIS) [³⁵S]TBPS binding. THIP displaced more [³⁵S]TBPS binding than GABA in several brain regions, indicating that THIP also inhibited GIS-binding. In these regions, GABA prevented the effect of THIP on GIS-binding. GIS-binding was increased in the cerebellar granule cell layer of δ KO and α4 + δ KO mice, being only slightly diminished in that of α1 KO mice. In the thalamus and some other forebrain regions of wild-type mice, a significant amount of GIS-binding was detected. This GIS-binding was higher in α4 KO mice. However, it was fully abolished in α1 KO mice, indicating that the α1 subunit was obligatory for the GIS-binding in the forebrain.Our results suggest that native GABA_A receptors in brain sections showing reduced displacing capacity of [³⁵S]TBPS binding by GABA (partial agonism) minimally require the assembly of α1 and β subunits in the forebrain and of α6 and β subunits in the cerebellar granule cell layer. These receptors may function as extrasynaptic GABA_A receptors.     

Characteristic Expressions of GABA Receptors and GABA Producing/Transporting Molecules in Rat Kidney

Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is an important neurotransmitter, but recent reports have revealed the expression of GABAergic components in peripheral, non-neural tissues. GABA administration induces natriuresis and lowers blood pressure, suggesting renal GABA targets. However, systematic evaluation of renal GABAergic components has not been reported. In this study, kidney cortices of Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY) were used to assay for messenger RNAs of GABA-related molecules using RT-PCR. In WKY kidney cortex, GABA_A receptor subunits, α1, β3, δ, ε and π, in addition to both types of GABA_B receptors, R1 and R2, and GABA_C receptor ρ1 and ρ2 subunit mRNAs were detected. Kidney cortex also expressed mRNAs of glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) 65, GAD67, 4-aminobutyrate aminotransferase and GABA transporter, GAT2. Western blot and/or immunohistochemistry were performed for those molecules detected by RT-PCR. By immunofluorescent observation, co-staining of α1, β3, and π subunits was observed mainly on the apical side of cortical tubules, and immunoblot of kidney protein precipitated with π subunit antibody revealed α1 and β3 subunit co-assembly. This is the first report of GABA_A receptor π subunit in the kidney. In summary, unique set of GABA receptor subunits and subtypes were found in rat kidney cortex. As GABA producing enzymes, transporters and degrading enzyme were also detected, a possible existence of local renal GABAergic system with an autocrine/paracrine mechanism is suggested.     

Desensitization of the Neurokinin-1 Receptor (NK1-R) in Neurons: Effects of Substance P on the Distribution of NK1-R, Gαq/11, G-Protein Receptor Kinase-2/3, and β-Arrestin-1/2

Observations in reconstituted systems and transfected cells indicate that G-protein receptor kinases (GRKs) and β-arrestins mediate desensitization and endocytosis of G-protein–coupled receptors. Little is known about receptor regulation in neurons. Therefore, we examined the effects of the neurotransmitter substance P (SP) on desensitization of the neurokinin-1 receptor (NK1-R) and on the subcellular distribution of NK1-R, G_αq/11, GRK-2 and -3, and β-arrestin-1 and -2 in cultured myenteric neurons. NK1-R was coexpressed with immunoreactive G_αq/11, GRK-2 and -3, and β-arrestin-1 and -2 in a subpopulation of neurons. SP caused 1) rapid NK1-R–mediated increase in [Ca²⁺]_i, which was transient and desensitized to repeated stimulation; 2) internalization of the NK1-R into early endosomes containing SP; and 3) rapid and transient redistribution of β-arrestin-1 and -2 from the cytosol to the plasma membrane, followed by a striking redistribution of β-arrestin-1 and -2 to endosomes containing the NK1-R and SP. In SP-treated neurons G_αq/11 remained at the plasma membrane, and GRK-2 and -3 remained in centrally located and superficial vesicles. Thus, SP induces desensitization and endocytosis of the NK1-R in neurons that may be mediated by GRK-2 and -3 and β-arrestin-1 and -2. This regulation will determine whether NK1-R–expressing neurons participate in functionally important reflexes.     

The α2δ subunit augments functional expression and modifies the pharmacology of CaV1.3 L-type channels

The auxiliary Ca_Vα₂δ-1 subunit is an important component of voltage-gated Ca²⁺ (Ca_V) channel complexes in many tissues and of great interest as a drug target. Nevertheless, its exact role in specific cell functions is still unknown. This is particularly important in the case of the neuronal L-type Ca_V channels where these proteins play a key role in the secretion of neurotransmitters and hormones, gene expression, and the activation of other ion channels. Therefore, using a combined approach of patch-clamp recordings and molecular biology, we studied the role of the Ca_Vα₂δ-1 subunit on the functional expression and the pharmacology of recombinant L-type Ca_V1.3 channels in HEK-293 cells. Co-expression of Ca_Vα₂δ-1 significantly increased macroscopic currents and conferred the Ca_V1.3α₁/Ca_Vβ₃ channels sensitivity to the antiepileptic/analgesic drugs gabapentin and AdGABA. In contrast, Ca_Vα₂δ-1 subunits harboring point mutations in N-glycosylation consensus sequences or the proteolytic site as well as in conserved cysteines in the transmembrane δ domain of the protein, reduced functionality in terms of enhancement of Ca_V1.3α₁/Ca_Vβ₃ currents. In addition, co-expression of the δ domain drastically inhibited macroscopic currents through recombinant Ca_V1.3 channels possibly by affecting channel synthesis. Together these results provide several lines of evidence that the Ca_Vα₂δ-1 auxiliary subunit may interact with Ca_V1.3 channels and regulate their functional expression.     

Synaptic localization of α5 GABA (A) receptors via gephyrin interaction regulates dendritic outgrowth and spine maturation

GABA_A receptor subunit composition is a critical determinant of receptor localization and physiology, with synaptic receptors generating phasic inhibition and extrasynaptic receptors producing tonic inhibition. Extrasynaptically localized α5 GABA_A receptors are largely responsible for tonic inhibition in hippocampal neurons. However, we show here that inhibitory synapses also contain a constant level of α5 GABA_A receptors throughout neuronal development, as measured by its colocalization with gephyrin, the inhibitory postsynaptic scaffolding protein. Immunoprecipitation of the α5 subunit from both cultured neurons and adult rat brain coimmunoprecipitated gephyrin, confirming this interaction in vivo. Furthermore, the α5 subunit can interact with gephyrin independent of other synaptically localized alpha subunits, as shown by immunoprecipitation experiments in HEK cells. By replacing the α5 predicted gephyrin binding domain (Residues 370–385) with either the high affinity gephyrin binding domain of the α2 subunit or homologous residues from the extrasynaptic α4 subunit that does not interact with gephyrin, α5 GABA_A receptor localization shifted into or out of the synapse, respectively. These shifts in the ratio of synaptic/extrasynaptic α5 localization disrupted dendritic outgrowth and spine maturation. In contrast to the predominant view of α5 GABA_A receptors being extrasynaptic and modulating tonic inhibition, we identify an intimate association of the α5 subunit with gephyrin, resulting in constant synaptic levels of α5 GABA_AR throughout circuit formation that regulates neuronal development. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Develop Neurobiol 75: 1241–1251, 2015     

Effect of homologous serotonin receptor loop substitutions on the heterologous expression in Pichia of a chimeric acetylcholine-binding protein with α-bungarotoxin-binding activity

The molluscan acetylcholine-binding protein (AChBP) is a soluble homopentameric homolog of the extracellular domain of various ligand-gated ion channels. Previous studies have reported that AChBP, when fused to the ion pore domain of the serotonin receptor (5HT_3AR), can form a functional ligand-gated chimeric channel only if the AChBP loop regions between β-strands β1 and β2 (β1–β2), β6 and β7 (β6–β7), and β8 and β9 (β8–β9) are replaced with those of the 5HT_3AR. To investigate further the potential interactions among these three important loop regions in a membrane- and detergent-free system, we designed AChBP constructs in which loops β1–β2, β6–β7, and β8–β9 of the AChBP were individually and combinatorially substituted in all permutations with the analogous loops of the 5HT_3AR. These chimeras were expressed as secreted proteins using the Pichia pastoris yeast expression system. [¹²⁵I]-α-Bungarotoxin-binding was detected in the culture media obtained from homologous recombinant clones expressing the wild-type AChBP, the β1–β2 loop-only chimera, and the chimera containing all three 5HT_3AR loop substitutions. The remaining chimeras failed to show [¹²⁵I]-α-bungarotoxin binding, and further analysis of cellular extracts allowed us to determine that these binding-negative chimeric constructs accumulated intracellularly and were not secreted into the culture medium. Our results demonstrate that coordinated interactions among loops β1–β2, β6–β7, and β8–β9 are essential for the formation of a functional ligand-binding site, as evidenced by [¹²⁵I]-α-bungarotoxin-binding, and for efficient protein secretion. In addition, the constructs described here demonstrate the feasibility of utilizing soluble scaffolds to explore functionally important interactions within the extracellular domain of membrane-bound proteins.     

Single Expressed Glycine Receptor Domains Reconstitute Functional Ion Channels without Subunit-specific Desensitization Behavior

Cys loop receptors are pentameric arrangements of independent subunits that assemble into functional ion channels. Each subunit shows a domain architecture. Functional ion channels can be reconstituted even from independent, nonfunctional subunit domains, as shown previously for GlyRα1 receptors. Here, we demonstrate that this reconstitution is not restricted to α1 but can be transferred to other members of the Cys loop receptor family. A nonfunctional GlyR subunit, truncated at the intracellular TM3–4 loop by a premature stop codon, can be complemented by co-expression of the missing tail portion of the receptor. Compared with α1 subunits, rescue by domain complementation was less efficient when GlyRα3 or the GABA_A/C subunit ρ1 was used. If truncation disrupted an alternative splicing cassette within the intracellular TM3–4 loop of α3 subunits, which also regulates receptor desensitization, functional rescue was not possible. When α3 receptors were restored by complementation using domains with and without the spliced insert, no difference in desensitization was found. In contrast, desensitization properties could even be transferred between α1/α3 receptor chimeras harboring or lacking the α3 splice cassette proving that functional rescue depends on the integrity of the alternative splicing cassette in α3. Thus, an intact α3 splicing cassette in the TM3–4 loop environment is indispensable for functional rescue, and the quality of receptor restoration can be assessed from desensitization properties.     

γ-Aminobutyric Acid Type A (GABAA) Receptor Subunits Play a Direct Structural Role in Synaptic Contact Formation via Their N-terminal Extracellular Domains

The establishment of cell-cell contacts between presynaptic GABAergic neurons and their postsynaptic targets initiates the process of GABAergic synapse formation. GABA_A receptors (GABA_ARs), the main postsynaptic receptors for GABA, have been recently demonstrated to act as synaptogenic proteins that can single-handedly induce the formation and functional maturation of inhibitory synapses. To establish how the subunit composition of GABA_ARs influences their ability to induce synaptogenesis, a co-culture model system incorporating GABAergic medium spiny neurons and the HEK293 cells, stably expressing different combinations of receptor subunits, was developed. Analyses of HEK293 cell innervation by medium spiny neuron axons using immunocytochemistry, activity-dependent labeling, and electrophysiology have indicated that the γ2 subunit is required for the formation of active synapses and that its effects are influenced by the type of α/β subunits incorporated into the functional receptor. To further characterize this process, the large N-terminal extracellular domains (ECDs) of α1, α2, β2, and γ2 subunits were purified using the baculovirus/Sf9 cell system. When these proteins were applied to the co-cultures of MSNs and α1/β2/γ2-expressing HEK293 cells, the α1, β2, or γ2 ECD each caused a significant reduction in contact formation, in contrast to the α2 ECD, which had no effect. Together, our experiments indicate that the structural role of GABA_ARs in synaptic contact formation is determined by their subunit composition, with the N-terminal ECDs of each of the subunits directly participating in interactions between the presynaptic and postsynaptic elements, suggesting the these interactions are multivalent and specific.     

GABAA Receptor α1 Subunit Mutation A322D Associated with Autosomal Dominant Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy Reduces the Expression and Alters the Composition of Wild Type GABAA Receptors

A GABA_A receptor (GABA_AR) α1 subunit mutation, A322D (AD), causes an autosomal dominant form of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (ADJME). Previous studies demonstrated that the mutation caused α1(AD) subunit misfolding and rapid degradation, reducing its total and surface expression substantially. Here, we determined the effects of the residual α1(AD) subunit expression on wild type GABA_AR expression to determine whether the AD mutation conferred a dominant negative effect. We found that although the α1(AD) subunit did not substitute for wild type α1 subunits on the cell surface, it reduced the surface expression of α1β2γ2 and α3β2γ2 receptors by associating with the wild type subunits within the endoplasmic reticulum and preventing them from trafficking to the cell surface. The α1(AD) subunit reduced surface expression of α3β2γ2 receptors by a greater amount than α1β2γ2 receptors, thus altering cell surface GABA_AR composition. When transfected into cultured cortical neurons, the α1(AD) subunit altered the time course of miniature inhibitory postsynaptic current kinetics and reduced miniature inhibitory postsynaptic current amplitudes. These findings demonstrated that, in addition to causing a heterozygous loss of function of α1(AD) subunits, this epilepsy mutation also elicited a modest dominant negative effect that likely shapes the epilepsy phenotype.     

A Novel Bifunctional Alkylphenol Anesthetic Allows Characterization of γ-Aminobutyric Acid,Type A (GABAA), Receptor Subunit Binding Selectivity in Synaptosomes

Propofol, an intravenous anesthetic, is a positive modulator of the GABA_A receptor, but the mechanistic details, including the relevant binding sites and alternative targets, remain disputed. Here we undertook an in-depth study of alkylphenol-based anesthetic binding to synaptic membranes. We designed, synthesized, and characterized a chemically active alkylphenol anesthetic (2-((prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)methyl)-5-(3-(trifluoromethyl)-3H-diazirin-3-yl)phenol, AziPm-click (1)), for affinity-based protein profiling (ABPP) of propofol-binding proteins in their native state within mouse synaptosomes. The ABPP strategy captured ∼4% of the synaptosomal proteome, including the unbiased capture of five α or β GABA_A receptor subunits. Lack of γ2 subunit capture was not due to low abundance. Consistent with this, independent molecular dynamics simulations with alchemical free energy perturbation calculations predicted selective propofol binding to interfacial sites, with higher affinities for α/β than γ-containing interfaces. The simulations indicated hydrogen bonding is a key component leading to propofol-selective binding within GABA_A receptor subunit interfaces, with stable hydrogen bonds observed between propofol and α/β cavity residues but not γ cavity residues. We confirmed this by introducing a hydrogen bond-null propofol analogue as a protecting ligand for targeted-ABPP and observed a lack of GABA_A receptor subunit protection. This investigation demonstrates striking interfacial GABA_A receptor subunit selectivity in the native milieu, suggesting that asymmetric occupancy of heteropentameric ion channels by alkylphenol-based anesthetics is sufficient to induce modulation of activity.     

Interaction of the ubiquitin carboxyl terminal esterase L1 with α2-adrenergic receptors inhibits agonist-mediated p44/42 MAP kinase activation

Neuroprotective effects of α₂-adrenergic receptor (AR) agonists are mediated via the α_2AAR subtype, but the molecular mechanisms underlying these actions are still not elucidated. A two-hybrid screen was performed to identify new proteins that may control α₂AR receptor function and trafficking. This screen identified the ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase-L1 (Uch-L1), a protein associated with Parkinson's disease, as α₂AR interacting protein. This interaction was confirmed and evaluated by GST pull down assays demonstrating that Uch-L1 binds preferentially to the α_2AAR subtype and only with less affinity to α_2BAR and α_2CAR. Co-immunoprecipitation of epitope-tagged proteins confirmed the specificity of this interaction in vivo. Moreover, co-transfection of a truncated G-protein coupled receptor kinase-DNA preventing α₂AR phosphorylation led to an increased signal-strength of coimmunoprecipitated Uch-L1. Confocal laser microscopy showed that interaction of α_2AAR and Uch-L1 occurred in the cytoplasm. α₂AR agonist mediated activation of p44/42 MAP Kinase was drastically decreased in the presence of Uch-L1 indicating a functional relevance of this interaction. These findings may present a mechanism contributing to subtype-specific α₂AR trafficking and a potential pathway for the neuroprotective effects of α₂AR agonists.