Interaction of CheY with the C-terminal peptide of CheZ

Chemotaxis, a means for motile bacteria to sense the environment and achieve directed swimming, is controlled by flagellar rotation. The primary output of the chemotaxis machinery is the phosphorylated form of the response regulator CheY (P~CheY). The steady-state level of P~CheY dictates the direction of rotation of the flagellar motor. The chemotaxis signal in the form of P~CheY is terminated by the phosphatase CheZ. Efficient dephosphorylation of CheY by CheZ requires two distinct protein-protein interfaces: one involving the strongly conserved C-terminal helix of CheZ (CheZ_C) tethering the two proteins together and the other constituting an active site for catalytic dephosphorylation. In a previous work (J. Guhaniyogi, V. L. Robinson, and A. M. Stock, J. Mol. Biol. 359:624-645, 2006), we presented high-resolution crystal structures of CheY in complex with the CheZ_C peptide that revealed alternate binding modes subject to the conformational state of CheY. In this study, we report biochemical and structural data that support the alternate-binding-mode hypothesis and identify key recognition elements in the CheY-CheZ_C interaction. In addition, we present kinetic studies of the CheZ_C-associated effect on CheY phosphorylation with its physiologically relevant phosphodonor, the histidine kinase CheA. Our results indicate mechanistic differences in phosphotransfer from the kinase CheA versus that from small-molecule phosphodonors, explaining a modest twofold increase of CheY phosphorylation with the former, observed in this study, relative to a 10-fold increase previously documented with the latter.     

A remote CheZ orthologue retains phosphatase function

Aspartyl‐phosphate phosphatases underlie the rapid responses of bacterial chemotaxis. One such phosphatase, CheZ, was originally proposed to be restricted to beta and gamma proteobacter, suggesting only a small subset of microbes relied on this protein. A putative CheZ phosphatase was identified genetically in the epsilon proteobacter Helicobacter pylori (Mol Micro 61:187). H. pylori utilizes a chemotaxis system consisting of CheAY, three CheVs, CheW, CheY_HP and the putative CheZ to colonize the host stomach. Here we investigate whether this CheZ has phosphatase activity. We phosphorylated potential targets in vitro using either a phosphodonor or the CheAY kinase and [γ‐³²P]‐ATP, and found that H. pylori CheZ (CheZ_HP) efficiently dephosphorylates CheY_HP and CheAY and has additional weak activity on CheV2. We detected no phosphatase activity towards CheV1 or CheV3. Mutations corresponding to Escherichia coli CheZ active site residues or deletion of the C‐terminal region inactivate CheZ_HP phosphatase activity, suggesting the two CheZs function similarly. Bioinformatics analysis suggests that CheZ phosphatases are found in all proteobacteria classes, as well as classes Aquificae, Deferribacteres, Nitrospira and Sphingobacteria, demonstrating that CheZ phosphatases are broadly distributed within Gram‐negative bacteria.     

Localization of components of the chemotaxis machinery of Escherichia coli using fluorescent protein fusions

We prepared fusions of yellow fluorescent protein [the YFP variant of green fluorescent protein (GFP)] with the cytoplasmic chemotaxis proteins CheY, CheZ and CheA and the flagellar motor protein FliM, and studied their localization in wild-type and mutant cells of Escherichia coli. All but the CheA fusions were functional. The cytoplasmic proteins CheY, CheZ and CheA tended to cluster at the cell poles in a manner similar to that observed earlier for methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs), but only if MCPs were present. Co-localization of CheY and CheZ with MCPs was CheA dependent, and co-localization of CheA with MCPs was CheW dependent, as expected. Co-localization with MCPs was confirmed by immunofluorescence using an anti-MCP primary antibody. The motor protein FliM appeared as discrete spots on the sides of the cell. These were seen in wild-type cells and in a fliN mutant, but not in flhC or fliG mutants. Co-localization with flagellar structures was confirmed by immunofluorescence using an antihook primary antibody. Surprisingly, we did not observe co-localization of CheY with motors, even under conditions in which cells tumbled.     

Mutations in the chemotactic response regulator, CheY, that confer resistance to the phosphatase activity of CheZ

CheY, a small cytoplasmic response regulator, plays an essential role in the chemotaxis pathway. The concentration of phospho-CheY is thought to determine the swimming behaviour of the cell: high levels of phospho-CheY cause bacteria to rotate their flagella clockwise and tumble, whereas low levels of the phos-phorylated form of the protein allow counter-ciockwise rotation of the flagella and smooth swimming. The phosphorylation state of CheY in vivo is determined by the activity of the phosphoryl donor CheA, and by the antagonistic effect of dephosphorylation of phospho-CheY. The dephosphorylation rate is controlled by the intrinsic autohydrolytic activity of phospho-CheY and by the CheZ protein, which accelerates dephosphorylation. We have analysed the effect of CheZ on the dephosphorylation rates of several mutant CheY proteins. Two point mutations were identified which were 50-fold and 5-fold less sensitive to the activity of CheZ than was the wild-type protein. Nonetheless, the phosphorylation and autodephos-phorylation rates of these mutants, CheY23ND and CheY26KE, were observed to be identical to those of wild-type CheY in the absence of CheZ. These are the first examples of CheY mutations that reduce sensitivity to the phosphatase activity of CheZ without being altered in terms of their intrinsic phosphorylation and autodephospborylation rates, interestingly, the residues Asn-23 and Lys-26 are located on a face of CheY far from the phosphorylation site (Asp-57), distinct from the previously described site of inter-action with the histidine kinase CheA, and partially overlapping with a region implicated in interaction with the flagellar switch.     

Response regulation in bacterial chemotaxis

The signal transduction system that mediates bacterial chemotaxis allows cells to moduate their swimming behavior in response to fluctuations in chemical stimuli. Receptors at the cell surface receive information from the surroundings. Signals are then passed from the receptors to cytoplasmic chemotaxis components: CheA, CheW, CheZ, CheR, and CheB. These proteins function to regulate the level of phosphorylation of a response regulator designated CheY that interacts with the flagellar motor switch complex to control swimming behavior. The structure of CheY has been determined. Magnesium ion is essential for activity. The active site contains highly conserved Asp residues that are required for divalent metal ion binding and CheY phosphorylation. Another residue-at the active site, Lys109, is important in the phosphorylation-induced conformational change that facilitates communication with the switch complex and another chemotaxis component, CheZ. CheZ facilitates the dephosphorylation of phospho-CheY. Defects in CheY and CheZ can be suppressed by mutations in the flagellar switch complex. CheZ is thought to modulate the switch bias by varying the level of phospho-CheY. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Sensory transduction to the flagellar motor of Sinorhizobium meliloti

Molecular mechanisms that govern chemotaxis and motility in the nitrogen-fixing soil bacterium, Sinorhizobium meliloti, are distinguished from the well-studied taxis systems of enterobacteria by new features. (i) In addition to six transmembrane chemotaxis receptors, S. meliloti has two cytoplasmic receptor proteins, McpY (methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein) and IcpA (internal chemotaxis protein). (ii) The tactic response is mediated by two response regulators, CheY1 and CheY2, but no phosphatase, CheZ. Phosphorylated CheY2 (CheY2-P) is the main regulator of motor function, whereas CheY1 assumes the role of a 'sink' for phosphate that is shuttled from CheY2-P back to CheA. This phospho-transfer from surplus CheY2-P to CheA to CheY1 replaces CheZ phosphatase. (iii) S. meliloti flagella have a complex structure with three helical ribbons that render the filaments rigid and unable to undergo polymorphic transitions from right- to left-handedness. Flagella rotate only clockwise and their motors can increase and decrease rotary speed. Hence, directional changes of a swimming cell occur during slow-down, when several flagella rotate at different speed. Two novel motility proteins, the periplasmic MotC and the cytoplasmic MotD, are essential for motility and rotary speed variation. A model consistent with these data postulates a MotC-mediated gating of the energizing MotA-MotB proton channels leading to variations in flagellar rotary speed.     

Protein phosphorylation in the bacterial chemotaxis system

Bacterial chemotaxis involves the detection of changes in concentration of specific chemicals in the environment of the cell as a function of time. This process is mediated by a series of cell surface receptors that interact with and activate intracellular protein phosphorylation. Five cytoplasmic proteins essential for chemotaxis have been shown to be involved in a coupled system of protein phosphorylation. Ligand binding to cell surface receptors affects the rate of autophosphorylation of the CheA protein. In the absence of an attractant bound to receptor and in the presence of the CheW protein, the rate of CheA autophosphorylation is markedly increased. Phosphorylated CheA can transfer phosphate to the CheY or CheB proteins; phosphorylation of these "effector" proteins may increase their activity. The CheY protein is thought to regulate flagellar rotation and thus control swimming behavior. The CheB protein modifies the cell surface receptor and thus regulates receptor function. Finally, another chemotaxis protein, CheZ, acts to specifically dephosphorylate CheY-phosphate. This system shows marked similarity to the 2-component sensor-regulator systems found to control specific gene expression in a variety of bacteria.     

Phosphorylation and binding interactions of CheY studied by use of Badan-labeled protein

In the chemotaxis signal transduction pathway of Escherichia coli, the response regulator protein CheY is phosphorylated by the receptor-coupled protein kinase CheA. Previous studies of CheY phosphorylation and CheY interactions with other proteins in the chemotaxis pathway have exploited the fluorescence properties of Trp(58), located immediately adjacent to the phosphorylation site of CheY (Asp(57)). Such studies can be complicated by the intrinsic fluorescence and absorbance properties of CheA and other proteins of interest. To circumvent these difficulties, we generated a derivative of CheY carrying a covalently attached fluorescent label that serves as a sensitive reporter of phosphorylation and binding events and that absorbs and emits light at wavelengths well removed from potential interference by other proteins. This labeled version of CheY has the (dimethylamino)naphthalene fluorophore from Badan [6-bromoacetyl-2-(dimethylamino)naphthalene] attached to the thiol group of a cysteine introduced at position 17 of CheY by site-directed mutagenesis. Under phosphorylating conditions (or in the presence of beryllofluoride), the fluorescence emission of Badan-labeled CheY(M17C) exhibited an approximately 10 nm blue shift and an approximately 30% increase in signal intensity at 490 nm. The fluorescence of Badan-labeled CheY(M17C) also served as a sensitive reporter of CheY-CheA binding interactions, exhibiting an approximately 50% increase in emission intensity in the presence of saturating levels of CheA. Compared to wild-type CheY, Badan-labeled CheY exhibited reduced ability to autodephosphorylate and could not interact productively with the phosphatase CheZ. However, with respect to autophosphorylation and interactions with CheA, Badan-CheY performed identically to wild-type CheY, allowing us to explore CheA-CheY phosphotransfer kinetics and binding kinetics without interference from the fluorescence/absorbance properties of CheA and ATP. These results provide insights into CheY interactions with CheA, CheZ, and other components of the chemotaxis signaling pathway.     

Action at a Distance: Amino Acid Substitutions That Affect Binding of the Phosphorylated CheY Response Regulator and Catalysis of Dephosphorylation Can Be Far from the CheZ Phosphatase Active Site

Two-component regulatory systems, in which phosphorylation controls the activity of a response regulator protein, provide signal transduction in bacteria. For example, the phosphorylated CheY response regulator (CheYp) controls swimming behavior. In Escherichia coli, the chemotaxis phosphatase CheZ stimulates the dephosphorylation of CheYp. CheYp apparently binds first to the C terminus of CheZ and then binds to the active site where dephosphorylation occurs. The phosphatase activity of the CheZ₂ dimer exhibits a positively cooperative dependence on CheYp concentration, apparently because the binding of the first CheYp to CheZ₂ is inhibited compared to the binding of the second CheYp. Thus, CheZ phosphatase activity is reduced at low CheYp concentrations. The CheZ21IT gain-of-function substitution, located far from either the CheZ active site or C-terminal CheY binding site, enhances CheYp binding and abolishes cooperativity. To further explore mechanisms regulating CheZ activity, we isolated 10 intragenic suppressor mutations of cheZ21IT that restored chemotaxis. The suppressor substitutions were located along the central portion of CheZ and were not allele specific. Five suppressor mutants tested biochemically diminished the binding of CheYp and/or the catalysis of dephosphorylation, even when the suppressor substitutions were distant from the active site. One suppressor mutant also restored cooperativity to CheZ21IT. Consideration of results from this and previous studies suggests that the binding of CheYp to the CheZ active site (not to the C terminus) is rate limiting and leads to cooperative phosphatase activity. Furthermore, amino acid substitutions distant from the active site can affect CheZ catalytic activity and CheYp binding, perhaps via the propagation of structural or dynamic perturbations through a helical bundle.     

Co-regulation of acetylation and phosphorylation of CheY, a response regulator in chemotaxis of Escherichia coli

CheY, a response regulator of the chemotaxis system in Escherichia coli, can be activated by either phosphorylation or acetylation to generate clockwise rotation of the flagellar motor. Both covalent modifications are involved in chemotaxis, but the function of the latter remains obscure. To understand why two different modifications apparently activate the same function of CheY, we studied the effect that each modification exerts on the other. The phosphodonors of CheY, the histidine kinase CheA and acetyl phosphate, each strongly inhibited both the autoacetylation of the acetylating enzyme, acetyl-CoA synthetase (Acs), and the acetylation of CheY. CheZ, the enzyme that enhances CheY dephosphorylation, had the opposite effect and enhanced Acs autoacetylation and CheY acetylation. These effects of the phosphodonors and CheZ were not caused by their respective activities. Rather, they were caused by their interactions with Acs and, possibly, with CheY. In addition, the presence of Acs elevated the phosphorylation levels of both CheA and CheY, and acetate repressed this stimulation. These observations suggest that CheY phosphorylation and acetylation are linked and co-regulated. We propose that the physiological role of these mutual effects is at two levels: linking chemotaxis to the metabolic state of the cell, and serving as a tuning mechanism that compensates for cell-to-cell variations in the concentrations of CheA and CheZ.     

Structural Basis for the Localization of the Chemotaxis Phosphatase CheZ by CheAS

CheA-short interacts with CheZ to localize CheZ to cell poles. The fifth helical region (residues 112 to 133) from the phosphotransfer domain of CheA interacts with CheZ and becomes ordered and helical, although it lacks a stable fold in the CheA fragment comprising residues 98 to 150 alone. One CheA molecule binds to one CheZ dimer.During bacterial chemotaxis, transmembrane receptors regulate the activity of the chemotaxis-specific histidine autokinase CheA with the aid of a coupling protein, CheW. CheA acts to phosphorylate the response regulator CheY and the response regulator domain of the methylesterase CheB. Phosphorylated CheY (CheY-P) binds to the “switch complex” in the flagellar motor to regulate the sense of rotation of the motor. CheZ acts as a CheY phosphate phosphatase.Maddock and Shapiro (4) showed that the chemotaxis receptors tend to be clustered and often located at polar ends of bacterial cells. This localization of receptors is in large part dependent on the presence of CheA and CheW, and the clusters that form in wild-type cells contain receptors, CheA, CheW, CheY, and CheZ (8). These clusters are essential for proper communication among receptors and other members of the signal transduction complex.In Escherichia coli and many related bacteria, a naturally occurring short form of CheA (CheA_S) (7) interacts with CheZ, enhances the rate of dephosphorylation of CheY-P (5, 10), and is responsible for the localization of CheZ to the polar assemblies of receptors, CheA, and CheW (1). Having the kinase and the phosphatase colocalized generates more uniform CheY levels within the bacterial cell (9).In order to understand the structural basis of the CheA_S-CheZ interaction, we examined a CheA fragment containing residues 98 to 150 (CheA_98-150). This fragment begins at the alternative site of translation initiation for CheA_S and extends into the linker region joining the histidine phosphotransfer domain to the CheY-binding domain. This fragment includes residues that correspond to the C terminus of the fourth helix and the complete fifth helix of the intact histidine phosphotransfer domain, also known as the P1 domain. Figure ​Figure11 depicts the binding of CheA_98-150 to CheZ, detected by changes in the fluorescence of the tryptophan residues of CheZ. The data points represent the fluorescence intensities from the complex, plotted against CheA_98-150 concentrations. Assay results were collected in triplicate, and the data points indicate the mean values. The fluorescence intensity (excitation wavelength, 295 nm; emission wavelength, 340 nm) was monitored after each addition and corrected for the blank buffer. The solid lines represent least-squares fits to a two-state binding model. As shown in Fig. ​Fig.1,1, CheA_98-150 binds to CheZ with a dissociation constant in the nanomolar range, with a stoichiometry of one CheA_98-150 molecule per CheZ dimer.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence detection of the interactions of wild-type CheZ (A) and CheZ_65-139 (B) with CheA_98-150. Wild-type CheZ and CheZ_65-139 (both present at 1.0 μM) were titrated with CheA_98-150 to produce saturation binding curves at 25°C. The dissociation constants fit to values between 10 and 30 nM but are too strong to be determined accurately at these CheZ concentrations. arb units, arbitrary units.Figure ​Figure22 shows the ¹H-¹⁵N correlation spectrum for CheA_98-150. The resonances were mostly resolved and sharp, with a limited dispersion of chemical shifts along the ¹H dimension, suggesting a high degree of backbone mobility (2). Complete backbone assignments for the nonproline residues in CheA_98-150 were made using standard HNCACB and CBCA(CO)NH methods (6). We have assigned Glu100 through His154 (a residue of the His₆ tag). Although the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra and ¹⁵N relaxation properties (3) suggest that this fragment has no stable structure under these conditions, the central region (Asp112 to Glu133) exhibits positive (¹H-)¹⁵N nuclear Overhauser effects and large, positive (up to 2.6 ppm) Cα secondary shifts (11), consistent with a partially rigid, helical structure.Open in a separate windowFIG. 2.¹H-¹⁵N heteronuclear single-quantum coherence spectra of 100 mM ¹⁵N-labeled CheA_98-150 in the absence (black) and presence (red) of 200 mM unlabeled CheZ. Amino acid residues disappearing (black) or displaying significant chemical-shift perturbations (red) are identified.To establish which residues of CheA_98-150 are involved in CheZ binding, we titrated ¹⁵N-labeled CheA_98-150 with unlabeled wild-type CheZ. The spectra were collected using a mixture of 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.8, 1 mM EDTA, and 2 mM dithiothreitol at 25°C. The ¹H-¹⁵N resonances from Asp112 to Glu133, the fifth helix of the N-terminal domain in CheA, weakened as CheZ was added, and these peaks disappeared with the addition of two molar equivalents of CheZ subunits. A new set of resonances, albeit somewhat broadened, appeared near Asp112 to Glu133, suggesting that these residues are at the periphery of the binding region and retain sufficient mobility in the bound state to be observed. New resonances for these residues from the bound state strengthened, whereas resonances from the free state weakened, as the CheZ concentration increased. This pattern of resonance changes is characteristic of an interaction that is in the slow-exchange regime on the NMR time scale. The disappearance of the CheA resonances at a 1:2 ratio with CheZ again indicates that the binding stoichiometry is two CheZ monomers per CheA_98-150 molecule, and the bound complex in the protonated form is likely too large (∼100 kDa) or elongated to be observed.To examine the CheA-CheZ interaction in more detail, we assigned the amide resonances from CheA_98-150 in a complex with a shortened form of CheZ comprising residues 65 to 139 (CheZ_65-139). We chose to focus on this central region of CheZ because it gave sharper CheA resonances in the complex but still bound CheA_98-150 very strongly. The ¹³C backbone chemical shifts of the bound form of CheA_98-150 support a fully helical structure (12) for the region of Asp 112 to Glu133.Results from chemical shift perturbation experiments with CheZ_65-139 indicate that the CheA_98-150-binding site in CheZ is the helix bundle tip, where several aromatic residues cluster (data not shown). Several extreme-upfield methyl proton resonances of CheZ_65-139 shifted downfield upon binding with CheA_98-150, indicating a reorganization of aliphatic methyl groups and aromatic rings in CheZ. Many CheZ_65-139 resonances shifted upon binding, strongly indicating that CheA_S induces global structural changes that propagate from the binding site toward the central, CheY-binding region. This possibility is consistent with the observed perturbations of histidine side chain resonances of CheZ_65-139 at the other end of the helix bundle (data not shown). The imidazole rings from the four histidines in a CheZ_65-139 dimer are situated 25 to 30 Å from the helix bundle tip. The resonances from the imidazole nitrogen atoms and carbon-bound protons detected by ¹H-¹⁵N correlation spectra are clearly affected by the binding of CheA_98-150.We identified the region from Asp112 to Glu133 in CheA_98-150 as being responsible for CheZ binding. This region corresponds to the fifth helix in the intact P1 domain of CheA. NMR data indicate that this region is still mildly helical in CheA_98-150, although it lacks folding cooperativity. The helical content is enhanced by CheZ binding. A model of the complex with one CheA and two CheZ molecules was built (Fig. ​(Fig.3).3). The CheA_S helix formed by residues 112 to 133 is shown bound to an opening formed by the two helical hairpins in a CheZ dimer. A space-filling model (not shown) indicates that there is not enough room to accommodate the CheA helix, suggesting that near the hairpin turn region the four-helix bundle of CheZ expands upon the binding of CheA_S, resulting in structural changes remote from the binding area. This assumption is consistent with the extensive peak movements observed in the CheZ_65-139 spectrum upon the binding of CheA_S. These binding-induced structural changes near the middle of the CheZ helical bundle are likely to be responsible for enhanced CheY-P-binding affinity and/or catalysis of phosphate hydrolysis, leading to increased CheY-P phosphatase activity.Open in a separate windowFIG. 3.Model of the CheZ-CheA_S interaction. The model shows residues 65 to 139 of CheZ as a helical ribbon (Protein Data Bank identification number 1KMI). The cluster of aromatic residues in CheZ is shown in magenta, and the helical CheA residues 112 to 133 are shown end-on with blue and red side chains. The CheA helix (residues 112 to 133) was taken from the known structure of the Htp domain of CheA (Protein Data Bank identification number 1I5N) and manually docked with CheZ to maximize hydrophobic contact.     

Proteomic mapping of a suppressor of non-chemotactic cheW mutants reveals that Helicobacter pylori contains a new chemotaxis protein

Bacterial chemotaxis is a colonization factor for the ulcer-causing pathogen Helicobacter pylori. H. pylori contains genes encoding the chemotaxis signalling proteins CheW, CheA and CheY; CheW couples chemoreceptors to the CheA kinase and is essential for chemotaxis. While characterizing a cheW mutant, we isolated a spontaneous, chemotactic variant (Che+). We determined that this phenotype was caused by a genetic change unlinked to the original cheW mutation. To locate the underlying Che+ mutation, we compared total protein profiles of the non-chemotactic mutant (cheW) with those from the cheW Che+ variant by two-dimensional differential in-gel electrophoresis. One protein was found only in the cheW Che+ variant. This protein was identified by MS/MS as HP0170, a hypothetical protein with no known function. DNA sequencing verified that hp0170 was mutated in the cheW Che+ suppressor, and deletion of this open reading frame in the cheW background nearly recapitulated the Che+ suppressor phenotype. Using hidden Markov models, we found that HP0170 is a remote homologue of E. coli CheZ. CheZ interacts with phosphorylated CheY and stimulates its autodephosphorylation. CheZ was not predicted to be present in epsilon-proteobacteria. We found that chemotaxis in the cheW Che+ suppressor depended on both cheY and cheA. We hypothesize that a small amount of phosphorylated CheY is generated via CheA in the cheW mutant, and this amount is sufficient to affect flagellar rotation when HP0170 is removed. Our results suggest that HP0170 is a remote homologue of CheZ, and that CheZ homologues are found in a broader range of bacteria than previously supposed.     

Signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis

Motile bacteria respond to environmental cues to move to more favorable locations. The components of the chemotaxis signal transduction systems that mediate these responses are highly conserved among prokaryotes including both eubacterial and archael species. The best-studied system is that found in Escherichia coli. Attractant and repellant chemicals are sensed through their interactions with transmembrane chemoreceptor proteins that are localized in multimeric assemblies at one or both cell poles together with a histidine protein kinase, CheA, an SH3-like adaptor protein, CheW, and a phosphoprotein phosphatase, CheZ. These multimeric protein assemblies act to control the level of phosphorylation of a response regulator, CheY, which dictates flagellar motion. Bacterial chemotaxis is one of the most-understood signal transduction systems, and many biochemical and structural details of this system have been elucidated. This is an exciting field of study because the depth of knowledge now allows the detailed molecular mechanisms of transmembrane signaling and signal processing to be investigated.     

Identification of the binding interfaces on CheY for two of its targets, the phosphatase CheZ and the flagellar switch protein fliM.

CheY is the response regulator protein serving as a phosphorylation-dependent switch in the bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction pathway. CheY has a number of proteins with which it interacts during the course of the signal transduction pathway. In the phosphorylated state, it interacts strongly with the phosphatase CheZ, and also the components of the flagellar motor switch complex, specifically with FliM. Previous work has characterized peptides consisting of small regions of CheZ and FliM which interact specifically with CheY. We have quantitatively measured the binding of these peptides to both unphosphorylated and phosphorylated CheY using fluorescence spectroscopy. There is a significant enhancement of the binding of these peptides to the phosphorylated form of CheY, suggesting that these peptides share much of the binding specificity of the intact targets of the phosphorylated form of CheY. We also have used modern nuclear magnetic resonance methods to characterize the sites of interaction of these peptides on CheY. We have found that the binding sites are overlapping and primarily consist of residues in the C-terminal portion of CheY. Both peptides affect the resonances of residues at the active site, indicating that the peptides may either bind directly at the active site or exert conformational influences that reach to the active site. The binding sites for the CheZ and FliM peptides also overlap with the previously characterized CheA binding interface. These results suggest that interaction with these three proteins of the signal transduction pathway are mutually exclusive. In addition, since these three proteins are sensitive to the phosphorylation state of CheY, it may be that the C-terminal region of CheY is most sensitive for the conformational changes occurring upon phosphorylation.     

Control of bacterial chemotaxis

Bacterial chemotaxis, which has been extensively studied for three decades, is the most prominent model system for signal transduction in bacteria. Chemotaxis is achieved by regulating the direction of flagellar rotation. The regulation is carried out by the chemotaxis protein, CheY. This protein is activated by a stimulus-dependent phosphorylation mediated by an autophosphorylatable kinase (CheA) whose activity is controlled by chemoreceptors. Upon phosphorylation, CheY dissociates from its kinase, binds to the switch at the base of the flagellar motor, and changes the motor rotation from the default direction (counter-clockwise) to clockwise. Phosphorylation may also be involved in terminating the response. Phosphorylated CheY binds to the phosphatase CheZ and modulates its oligomeric state and thereby its dephosphorylating activity. Thus CheY phosphorylation appears to be involved in controlling both the excitation and adaptation mechanisms of bacterial chemotaxis. Additional control sites might be involved in bacterial chemotaxis, e.g. lateral control at the receptor level, control at the motor level, or control by metabolites that link central metabolism with chemotaxis.     

Identification of a fourth cheY gene in Rhodobacter sphaeroides and interspecies interaction within the bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction pathway

The Escherichia coli chemotaxis signal transduction pathway has: CheA, a histidine protein kinase; CheW, a linker between CheA and sensory proteins; CheY, the effector; and CheZ, a signal terminator. Rhodobacter sphaeroides has multiple copies of these proteins (2 x CheA, 3 x CheW and 3 x CheY, but no CheZ). In this study, we found a fourth cheY and expressed these R. sphaeroides proteins in E. coli. CheA2 (but not CheA1) restored swarming to an E. coli cheA mutant (RP9535). CheW3 (but not CheW2) restored swarming to a cheW mutant of E. coli (RP4606). R. sphaeroides CheYs did not affect E. coli lacking CheY, but restored swarming to a cheZ strain (RP1616), indicating that they can act as signal terminators in E. coli. An E. coli CheY, which is phosphorylated but cannot bind the motor (CheY109KR), was expressed in RP1616 but had no effect. Overexpression of CheA2, CheW2, CheW3, CheY1, CheY3 and CheY4 inhibited chemotaxis of wild-type E. coli (RP437) by increasing its smooth-swimming bias. While some R. sphaeroides proteins restore tumbling to smooth-swimming E. coli mutants, their activity is not controlled by the chemosensory receptors. R. sphaeroides possesses a phosphorelay cascade compatible with that of E. coli, but has additional incompatible homologues.     

Interaction of CheY2 and CheY2-P with the cognate CheA kinase in the chemosensory-signalling chain of Sinorhizobium meliloti

An unusual regulatory mechanism involving two response regulators, CheY1 and CheY2, but no CheZ phosphatase, operates in the chemotactic signalling chain of Sinorhizobium meliloti . Active CheY2-P, phosphorylated by the cognate histidine kinase, CheA, is responsible for flagellar motor control. In the absence of any CheZ phosphatase activity, the level of CheY2-P is quickly reset by a phospho-transfer from CheY2-P first back to CheA, and then to CheY1, which acts as a phosphate sink. In studying the mechanism of this phosphate shuttle, we have used GFP fusions to show that CheY2, but not CheY1, associates with CheA at a cell pole. Cross-linking experiments with the purified proteins revealed that both CheY2 and CheY2-P bind to an isolated P2 ligand-binding domain of CheA, but CheY1 does not. The dissociation constants of CheA–CheY2 and CheA–CheY2-P indicated that both ligands bind with similar affinity to CheA. Based on the NMR structures of CheY2 and CheY2-P, their interactions with the purified P2 domain were analysed. The interacting surface of CheY2 comprises its C-terminal β4-α4-β5-α5 structural elements, whereas the interacting surface of CheY2-P is shifted towards the loop connecting β5 and α5. We propose that the distinct CheY2 and CheY2-P surfaces interact with two overlapping sites in the P2 domain that selectively bind either CheY2 or CheY2-P, depending on whether CheA is active or inactive.     

Reconstitution of signaling in bacterial chemotaxis.

Strains missing several genes required for chemotaxis toward amino acids, peptides, and certain sugars were tethered and their rotational behavior was analyzed. Null strains (called gutted) were deleted for genes that code for the transducers Tsr, Tar, Tap, and Trg and for the cytoplasmic proteins CheA, CheW, CheR, CheB, CheY, and CheZ. Motor switch components were wild type, flaAII(cheC), or flaBII(cheV). Gutted cells with wild-type motors spun exclusively counterclockwise, while those with mutant motors changed their directions of rotation. CheY reduced the bias (the fraction of time that cells spun counterclockwise) in either case. CheZ offset the effect of CheY to an extent that varied with switch allele but did not change the bias when tested alone. Transducers also increased the bias in the presence of CheY but not when tested alone. However, cells containing transducers and CheY failed to respond to attractants or repellents normally detected in the periplasm. This sensitivity was restored by addition of CheA and CheW. Thus, CheY both enhances clockwise rotation and couples the transducers to the flagella. CheZ acts, at the level of the motor, as a CheY antagonist. CheA or CheW or both are required to complete the signal pathway. A model is presented that explains these results and is consistent with other data found in the literature.     

Proposed Signal Transduction Role for Conserved CheY Residue Thr87, a Member of the Response Regulator Active-Site Quintet

CheY serves as a structural prototype for the response regulator proteins of two-component regulatory systems. Functional roles have previously been defined for four of the five highly conserved residues that form the response regulator active site, the exception being the hydroxy amino acid which corresponds to Thr87 in CheY. To investigate the contribution of Thr87 to signaling, we characterized, genetically and biochemically, several cheY mutants with amino acid substitutions at this position. The hydroxyl group appears to be necessary for effective chemotaxis, as a Thr→Ser substitution was the only one of six tested which retained a Che⁺ swarm phenotype. Although nonchemotactic, cheY mutants with amino acid substitutions T87A and T87C could generate clockwise flagellar rotation either in the absence of CheZ, a protein that stimulates dephosphorylation of CheY, or when paired with a second site-activating mutation, Asp13→Lys, demonstrating that a hydroxy amino acid at position 87 is not essential for activation of the flagellar switch. All purified mutant proteins examined phosphorylated efficiently from the CheA kinase in vitro but were impaired in autodephosphorylation. Thus, the mutant CheY proteins are phosphorylated to a greater degree than wild-type CheY yet support less clockwise flagellar rotation. The data imply that Thr87 is important for generating and/or stabilizing the phosphorylation-induced conformational change in CheY. Furthermore, the various position 87 substitutions differentially affected several properties of the mutant proteins. The chemotaxis and autodephosphorylation defects were tightly linked, suggesting common structural elements, whereas the effects on self-catalyzed and CheZ-mediated dephosphorylation of CheY were uncorrelated, suggesting different structural requirements for the two dephosphorylation reactions.     

CheZ phosphatase localizes to chemoreceptor patches via CheA-short

We have investigated the conditions required for polar localization of the CheZ phosphatase by using a CheZ-green fluorescent protein fusion protein that, when expressed from a single gene in the chromosome, restored chemotaxis to a DeltacheZ strain. Localization was observed in wild-type, DeltacheZ, DeltacheYZ, and DeltacheRB cells but not in cells with cheA, cheW, or all chemoreceptor genes except aer deleted. Cells making only CheA-short (CheA(S)) or CheA lacking the P2 domain also retained normal localization, whereas cells producing only CheA-long or CheA missing the P1 and P2 domains did not. We conclude that CheZ localization requires the truncated C-terminal portion of the P1 domain present in CheA(S). Missense mutations targeting residues 83 through 120 of CheZ also abolished localization. Two of these mutations do not disrupt chemotaxis, indicating that they specifically prevent interaction with CheA(S) while leaving other activities of CheZ intact.