Chiral Recognition of N‐Phthaloyl,N‐Tetrachlorophthaloyl,and N‐Naphthaloyl α‐Amino Acids and Their Esters on Polysaccharide‐Derived Chiral Stationary Phases

Enantiomeric separations of N‐phthaloyl (N‐PHT), N‐tetrachlorophthaloyl (N‐TCPHT), and N‐naphthaloyl (N‐NPHT) α‐amino acids and their esters were examined on several kinds of polysaccharide‐derived chiral stationary phases (CSPs). Resolution capability of CSPs was greater Chiralcel OF than the others for N‐PHT and N‐NPHT α‐amino acids and their esters. In N‐TCPHT α‐amino acids and their esters, good enantioselectivities showed Chiralcel OG for N‐TCPHT α‐amino acids, Chiralpak AD for N‐TCPHT α‐amino acid methyl esters, and Chiralcel OD for N‐TCPHT α‐amino acid ethyl esters, respectively. From the results of liquid chromatography and computational chemistry, it is concluded that l ‐form is preferred and more retained with electrostatic interaction in case of interaction between N‐PHT α‐amino acid derivatives and Chiralcel OF, N‐TCPHT α‐amino acid derivatives and Chiralcel OD, and N‐NPHT α‐amino acid derivatives and Chiracel OF. On the other hand, d ‐form is preferred and more retained with van der Waals interaction in case of interaction between N‐TCPHT α‐amino acid ester derivatives and Chiralcel OG and Chiralpak AD. Chirality 24:1037–1046, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Enantiomeric Separations of Pyriproxyfen and its Six Chiral Metabolites by High‐Performance Liquid Chromatography

Pyriproxyfen is a chiral insecticide, and over 10 metabolites have been identified in the environment. In this work the separations of the enantiomers of pyriproxyfen and its six chiral metabolites were studied by high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Both normal phase and reverse phase were applied using the chiral columns Chiralpak IA, Chiralpak IB, Chiralpak IC, Chiralcel OD, Chiralcel OD‐RH, Chiralpak AY‐H, Chiralpak AD‐H, Chiracel OJ‐H, (R,R)‐Whelk‐O 1, and Lux Cellulose‐3. The effects of the chromatographic parameters such as mobile phase composition and temperature on the separations were investigated and the enantiomers were identified with an optical rotation detector. The enantiomers of these targets could obtain complete separations (resolution factor Rs > 1.5) on Chiralpak IA, Chiralpak IB, Chiralcel OD, Chiralpak AY‐H, or Chiracel OJ‐H under normal conditions. Chiralcel OJ‐H showed the best chiral separation results with n‐hexane as mobile phase and isopropanol (IPA) as modifier. The simultaneous enantiomeric separation of pyriproxyfen and four chiral metabolites was achieved on Chiralcel OJ‐H under optimized condition: n‐hexane/isopropanol = 80/20, 15°C, flow rate of 0.8 ml/min, and UV detection at 230 nm. The enantiomers of pyriproxyfen and the metabolites A , C , and D obtained complete separations on Chiralpak IA, Chiralpak IC, and Lux Cellulose‐3 under reverse phase using acetonitrile/water as the mobile phase. The retention factors (k) and selectivity factors (α) decreased with increasing temperature, and the separations were better under low temperature in most cases. The work is of significance for the investigation of the environmental behaviors of pyriproxyfen on an enantiomeric level. Chirality 28:245–252, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Direct HPLC enantioseparation of chiral aptazepine derivatives on coated and immobilized polysaccharide-based chiral stationary phases

The direct HPLC enantioseparation of Mianserin and a series of aptazepine derivatives is accomplished on polysaccharide-based chiral stationary phases (CSPs). The resolutions are performed on the coated-type Chiralcel OD and Chiralpak AD CSPs and on the first commercially available immobilized-type Chiralpak IA CSP, in normal-phase and polar-organic modes. The complete separation of enantiomers of all racemates investigated was successfully achieved under at least one of CSP/eluent combinations employed. Pure alcohols such ethanol or 2-propanol, with a fixed percentage of DEA added, serve as valuable alternatives to the more common n-hexane-based normal-phase eluents in resolution of Mianserin on the AD CSP. In order to study the chiroptical properties of aptazepine derivatives, chromatographic resolutions are carried out at semipreparative scale using Chiralpak AD and Chiralpak IA as CSPs. Nonconventional dichloromethane-based eluents have permitted to expand the chiral resolving ability of the immobilized Chiralpak IA CSP and to perform mg-scale enantioseparations with an analytical-size column. Assignment of the absolute configuration of the separated enantiomers is empirically established by comparing their chiroptical data with those of structurally related Mianserin.     

Enantiomeric separation of prothioconazole and prothioconazole‐desthio on chiral stationary phases

Prothioconazole is a type of broad‐spectrum triazole thione fungicide developed by the Bayer Company. Prothioconazole‐desthio is the main metabolite of prothioconazole in the environment. In our study, enantiomeric separation of prothioconazole and prothioconazole‐desthio was performed on various chiral stationary phases (CSPs) by high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). It was found that polysaccharide CSPs showed better ability than brushing CSPs in enantiomeric separation. The successful chiral separation of prothioconazole could be achieved on self‐made Chiralcel OD, commercialized Chiralcel OJ‐H and Lux Cellulose‐1. Chiralpak IA, Chiralpak IB, Chiralpak IC, Chiralcel OD, Chiralpak AY‐H, Chiralpak AZ‐H, and Lux Cellulose‐1 realized the baseline separation of prothioconazole‐desthio enantiomers. Simultaneous enantiomeric separation of prothioconazole and prothioconazole‐desthio was performed on Lux Cellulose‐1 using acetonitrile (ACN) and water as mobile phase. In most cases, low temperature favored the separation of two compounds. The influence of the mobile phase ratio or type was deeply discussed. We obtained larger Rs and longer analysis time with a smaller proportion of isopropanol (IPA) or ethanol and more water content at the same temperature. The ratio of ACN and water had influences on the outflow orders of prothioconazole‐desthio enantiomers. This work provides a new approach for chiral separation of prothioconazole and prothioconazole‐desthio with a discussion of chiral separation mechanism on different CSPs.     

Resolution of some 4‐benzofurazanyl and 4‐benzofuroxanyl 1,4‐dihydropyridine derivatives by chiral HPLC on Whelk‐o1 and some polysaccharide chiral stationary phases

The chromatographic chiral resolution of racemic methyl 1,4‐dihydro‐2,6‐dimethyl‐5‐nitro‐4‐benzofurazanyl‐3‐carboxylates 1 and 2 and their benzofuroxanyl analogues 3 and 4 were studied on Whelk‐O1, Chiralcel OD‐H, Chiralcel OJ, and Chiralpak AD and AS. These CSPs were selected on the basis of the results of structural searches in Chirbase. Examination of the data and cluster analysis pointed out the influence of benzofurazane–benzofuroxane change versus α–β connection change on retention and enantioselectivity, respectively. The major contribution to the retention change arose from the type of heterocycle, whereas the major contribution to the enantioselectivity change came from the mode of connection (α or β) almost irrespective of the nature of the heterocycle. It resulted in a similarity of behaviour between 1 and 2 on one hand and 3 and 4 on the other as far as capacity factors were concerned, and in a similarity of behaviour between 1 and 3 on the one hand and 2 and 4 on the other as far as enantioselectivities were concerned. Chiralpak AS was selected for semipreparative resolution of the enantiomers. The study of several CSPs allowed us to obtain correlations of structure with retention and enantioselectivity as well as the choice of a semipreparative support to provide the quantities for biological tests. Chirality 11:602–608, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

HPLC‐Fluorescence Method for the Enantioselective Analysis of Propranolol in Rat Serum Using Immobilized Polysaccharide‐Based Chiral Stationary Phase

A stereoselective high‐performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method was developed and validated to determine S‐(?)‐ and R‐(+)‐propranolol in rat serum. Enantiomeric resolution was achieved on cellulose tris(3,5‐dimethylphenylcarbamate) immobilized onto spherical porous silica chiral stationary phase (CSP) known as Chiralpak IB. A simple analytical method was validated using a mobile phase consisted of n‐hexane‐ethanol‐triethylamine (95:5:0.4%, v/v/v) at a flow rate of 0.6 mL min^‐1 and fluorescence detection set at excitation/emission wavelengths 290/375 nm. The calibration curves were linear over the range of 10–400 ng mL^‐1 (R = 0.999) for each enantiomer with a detection limit of 3 ng mL^‐1. The proposed method was validated in compliance with ICH guidelines in terms of linearity, accuracy, precision, limits of detection and quantitation, and other aspects of analytical validation. Actual quantification could be made for propranolol isomers in serum obtained from rats that had been intraperitoneally (i.p.) administered a single dose of the drug. The proposed method established in this study is simple and sensitive enough to be adopted in the fields of clinical and forensic toxicology. Molecular modeling studies including energy minimization and docking studies were first performed to illustrate the mechanism by which the active enantiomer binds to the β‐adrenergic receptor and second to find a suitable interpretation of how both enantiomers are interacting with cellulose tris(3,5‐dimethylphenylcarbamate) CSP during the process of resolution. The latter interaction was demonstrated by calculating the binding affinities and interaction distances between propranolol enantiomers and chiral selector. Chirality 26:194–199, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Chiral separation of some 4a-methyl-1,2,3,4,4a,9a-hexahydro-fluoren-9-one derivatives as a probe for difference in solvation by 2-propanol of carbamate moiety in chiralcel OD-H,chiralpak AD,and chiralpak AS chiral stationary phases

Chromatographic resolution of 12 derivatives in the 4a-methyl-2,3,4,4a-tetrahydro-1H-fluorene and 4a-methyl-1,2,3,4,4a,9a-hexahydrofluoren-9-one series differing by the framework around position 9 and substitution in position 6, are reported on Chiralcel OD, Chiralpak AD, and Chiralpak AS under two elution conditions and according to the two classes of enantiomers. Results from principal component analysis (PCA) as well as hierarchical clustering show a clustering of the actual compounds depending on properties around position 9, the effect of the substituent in position 6 (methyl, chloro or fluoro) not being strong enough to intermesh the data. Carbamate phases show very different properties when they are used in the separation of a series of ketones C and α-chloroketones D , which differ in basicity and the steric requirement around the carbonyl. Analysis of the effect of 2-PrOH content in hexane on the retention is consistent with a large difference in solvation of the carbamate moiety by 2-PrOH, in the order Chiralcel OD > Chiralpak AD > Chiralpak AS. 4a-Methyl-2,3,4,4a-tetrahydro-1H-fluorene derivatives, which lack hydrogen bonding sites, are not discriminated on these CSPs and show identical k′ responses to 2-PrOH content changes on the three CSPs. Chirality 10:770–777, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Chiral separation of neonicotinoid insecticides by polysaccharide‐type stationary phases using high‐performance liquid chromatography and supercritical fluid chromatography

The enantiomeric separations of three neonicotinoid insecticides (identified as compounds 1 , 2 , and 3 ) were performed on three polysaccharide‐type chiral columns, that is, Chiralcel OD‐H, Chiralpak AD‐H, and Chiralpak IB, by high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC). Effects of the modifier percentage and column temperature on chiral recognitions of chiral stationary phases were also studied. Both 1 and 2 could be resolved on all three columns selected, with the highest R_s values obtained on Chiralpak AD‐H and Chiralcel OD‐H, respectively. However, satisfactory separation of the four stereoisomers of 3 was only achieved on Chiralcel OD‐H. Considering the effects of ethanol on the values of k, α, and R_s, we concluded that hydrogen bonding, π–π, and/or dipole–dipole interactions might be all responsible for the chiral separation. In comparison to HPLC, a shorter run time was achieved for 1 and 2 by SFC. However, 3 could not be stereoselectively resolved using SFC. On the basis of the calculated thermodynamic parameters, we found that the separation processes of enantiomers of 1 and 2 were entropy controlled and enthalpy controlled, respectively. Chirality, 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

A convenient and validated enantiomer separation of chiral aliphatic amines as nitrobenzoxadiazole derivatives on polysaccharide‐derived chiral stationary phases under simultaneous ultraviolet and fluorescence detection

A convenient method using a fluorogenic agent, 4‐chloro‐7‐nitro‐1,2,3‐benzoxadiazole (NBD‐Cl), was developed for enantiomer separation of chiral aliphatic amines including amino alcohols by normal high‐performance liquid chromatography. The enantiomer separation of chiral aliphatic amines as NBD derivatives was performed on six covalently bonded and four coated‐type polysaccharide‐derived chiral stationary phases (CSPs) under simultaneous ultraviolet (UV) and fluorescence detection (FLD). Among the covalently bonded CSPs, Chiralpak IE showed the best enantiomer separation for most analytes. The other CSPs also showed good enantioselectivity except for Chiralpak IB. On the other hand, Chiralpak AD‐H and Amylose‐1 generally exhibited better enantiomer separation of NBD derivatized chiral amines among the coated CSPs. The developed analytical technique was also applied to determine the optical purity of commercially available (R)‐ and (S)‐leucinol; the impurity was found to be 0.06%. The developed method was validated and proved to be an accurate, precise, sensitive, and selective method suitable for separation of chiral aliphatic amines as NBD derivatives under simultaneous UV and FLD.     

New chiral stationary phases based on (R)‐1‐naphthylethylamine bound to 2,4,5,6‐tetrachloro‐1,3‐dicyanobenzene

Chiral functionalization of 2,4,5,6‐tetrachloro‐1,3‐dicyanobenzene (1) by regioselective nucleophilic substitution of one or two chlorine atoms by optically pure (R)‐(+)‐1‐naphthylethylamine (NEA), or by a glycine unit as a spacer to (R)‐NEA, enables the preparation of brush‐type chiral selectors (2, 3, 9, 13). By the introduction of the 3‐aminopropyltriethoxysilyl (APTES) group, reactive intermediates 4a/b, 5, 10a/b, and 14a/b are obtained ( a/b indicate a mixture of regioisomers with APTES in 6‐ and 2‐position). Binding of these to silica gel afforded four novel chiral stationary phases (CSPs) 6, 7, 15, and 16. HPLC columns containing CSPs with (R)‐NEA directly linked to polysubstituted aromatic ring (6, 7) are not very effective in resolution of most of the 23 racemic analytes, whereas the columns with distant π‐basic subunits (15, 16) exhibited higher resolving efficacy, in particular towards the isopropyl esters of racemic N‐3,5‐dinitrobenzoyl‐α‐amino acids. Effective resolution of test racemates reveals the importance of the presence of the hydrogen bond donor amido group and the distance between the persubstituted benzene ring in 1 and the π‐basic naphthalene ring of (R)‐NEA. Chirality 11:722–730, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Enantioseparation of racecadotril using polysaccharide‐type chiral stationary phases in polar organic mode

Enantioseparation of the antidiarrheal drug, racecadotril, was investigated by liquid chromatography using polysaccharide‐type chiral stationary phases in polar organic mode. The enantiodiscrimininating properties of 4 different chiral columns (Chiralpak AD, Chiralcel OD, Chiralpak AS, Chiralcel OJ) with 5 different solvents (methanol, ethanol, 1‐propanol, 2‐propanol, and acetonitrile) at 5 different temperatures (5–40 °C) were investigated. Apart from Chiralpak AS column the other 3 columns showed significant enantioseparation capabilities. Among the tested mobile phases, alcohol type solvents were superior over acetonitrile, and significant differences in enantioselective performance of the selector were observed depending on the type of alcohol employed. Van't Hoff analysis was used for calculation of thermodynamic parameters which revealed that enantioseparation is mainly enthalpy controlled; however, enthropic control was also observed. Enantiopure standard was used to determine the enantiomer elution order, revealing chiral selector—and mobile‐phase dependent reversal of enantiomer elution order. Using the optimized method (Chiralcel OJ stationary phase, thermostated at 10 °C, 100% methanol, flow rate: 0.6 mL/min) baseline separation of racecadotril enantiomers (resolution = 3.00 ± 0.02) was achieved, with the R‐enantiomer eluting first. The method was validated according to the ICH guidelines, and its application was tested on capsule and granules containing the racemic mixture of the drug.     

Enantiomeric Recognition of Racemic 4‐Aryl‐1,4‐dihydropyridine Derivatives via Chiralpak AD‐H Stationary Phases

The chromatographic chiral resolution of two new series of racemic 4‐substituted‐1,4‐dihydropyridine derivatives was studied on a commercial Chiralpak AD‐H column. Analytes without 5,5‐dimethyl substituents ( 1–15 ) are more efficiently resolved than analytes with 5,5‐dimethyl groups ( 16–30 ). The AD‐H column discriminated between enantiomers through both hydrogen bonding attractions and π–π interactions. This interpretation is in accord with plots of the logarithm of separation factors, log(α), versus σ (Hammett–Swain substituent parameter) and σ⁺ (Brown substituent constant) plots. By elucidating the effects of the remote substituents on these chiral separations, it was shown that the influence of π–π interaction forces increase when steric bulk effects act to decrease the hydrogen bonding attractive forces on the AD‐H column. Chirality 24:854–859, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

A comparison of LC and SFC for cellulose- and amylose-derived chiral stationary phases

This paper presents a systematic comparison of liquid chromatography (LC) and supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) for Chiralcel OD and Chiralpak AD chiral stationary phases (CSPs), performed using various chiral compounds having a known or potential pharmaceutical activity. The chiral recognition mechanisms involved in LC and SFC for the enantiomeric separation of β-blockers have been studied more particularly. As a general rule, it appears that the presence of polar functions, like primary or secondary hydroxyl or amine functions, may result in marked discrepancies in selectivity between LC and SFC. This result is peculiar to cellulose- and amylose-derived CSPs, for which the interactions involved in chiral recognition mechanism are not always well balanced, contrary to what happens for independent CSPs. In the case of chiral resolution of polar solutes or polymer-type CSPs, the analyst should try both the LC and SFC techniques to be able to choose the more stereoselective one. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Preparation and evaluation of regioselectively substituted amylose derivatives for chiral separations

Six novel regioselectively substituted amylose derivatives with a benzoate at 2‐position and two different phenylcarbamates at 3‐ and 6‐positions were synthesized and their structures were characterized by ¹H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Their enantioseparation abilities were then examined as chiral stationary phases (CSPs) for high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) after they were coated on 3‐aminopropyl silica gels. Investigations indicated that the substituents at the 3‐ and 6‐positions played an important role in chiral recognition of these amylose 2‐benzoate serial derivatives. The derivatives demonstrated characteristic enantioseparation and some racemates were better resolved on these derivatives than on Chiralpak AD, which is one of the most efficient CSPs, utilizing coated amylose tris(3,5‐dimethylphenylcarbamate) as the chiral selector. Among the derivatives prepared, amylose 2‐benzoate‐3‐(phenylcarbamate/4‐methylphenylcarbamate)‐6‐(3,5‐dimethylphenylcarbamate) exhibited chiral recognition abilities comparable to that of Chiralpak AD and may be useful CSPs in the future. The effect of mobile phase on chiral recognition was also studied. In general, with the decreased concentration of 2‐propanol, better resolutions were obtained with longer retention times. Moreover, when ethanol was used instead of 2‐propanol, poorer resolutions were often achieved. However, in some cases, improved enantioselectivity was achieved with ethanol rather than 2‐propanol as the mobile phase modifier.     

Chromatographic resolution of chiral intermediates in β-adrenergic blocker synthesis on chiral stationary phases

The enantiomeric purities of optically active intermediates for β-adrenergic blocking agents prepared via enzyme-assisted processes can be determined rapidly and with high accuracy using HPLC on commercially available columns with chiral supports [Chiralcel OD, OB; Chiralpak OT(+)]. The dependence of the resolution parameters on the substitution pattern of both hydroxy compounds and their esters is reported. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Studies on Pidotimod Enantiomers With Chiralpak‐IA: Crystal Structure,Thermodynamic Parameters and Molecular Docking

Pidotimod, a synthetic dipeptide, has two chiral centers with biological and immunological activity. Its enantiomers were characterized by x‐ray crystallographic analysis. A chiral stationary phase (CSP) Chiralpak‐IA based on amylose derivatized with tris‐(3, 5‐dimethylphenyl carbamate) was used to separate pidotimod enantiomers. The mobile phase was prepared in a ratio of 35:65:0.2 of methyl‐tert‐butyl‐ether and acetonitrile trifluoroaceticacid. In addition, thermodynamics and molecular docking methods were used to explain the enantioseparation mechanism by Chiralpak‐IA. Thermodynamic studies were carried out from 10 to 45 °C. In general, both retention and enantioselectivity decreased as the temperature increased. Thermodynamic parameters indicate that the interaction force between the pidotimod enantiomer (4S, 2'R) and IA CSP is stronger and their complex model is more stable. According to GOLD molecular docking simulation, Van der Waals force is the leading cause of pidotimod enantiomers separation by IA CSP. Chirality 27:802–808, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Enantioseparation of benzazoles and benzanilides on polysaccharide‐based chiral columns

The chiral recognition ability of the polysaccharide‐based chiral columns (Chiralpak AD‐RH, Chiralpak AS‐RJ, Chiralpak IC, Chiralcel OD‐RH, and Chiralcel OJ‐RH) for the benzazoles and the benzanilides was evaluated under reversed phase conditions. The columns showed the high chiral recognition ability for a wide range of benzazoles and benzanilides. Twenty‐one racemates were used for the evaluation, and 20 racemates were completely separated on at least one of the columns. In particular, AS‐RH and OJ‐RH showed the high chiral recognition ability for the benzazoles, and the AD‐RH, IC, and OJ‐RH were effective for the benzanilides. Chirality 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Development of HPLC Chiral Stationary Phases Based on (+)‐(18‐Crown‐6)‐2,3,11,12‐tetracarboxylic Acid and Their Applications

Crown ether‐based chiral stationary phases (CSPs) have been known to be useful for the resolution of racemic primary amino compounds. In particular, CSPs based on (+)‐(18‐crown‐6)‐2,3,11,12‐tetracarboxylic acid have been reported to be useful for the resolution of secondary amino compounds as well as primary amino compounds. In this article, the process of developing various CSPs based on (+)‐(18‐crown‐6)‐2,3,11,12‐tetracarboxylic acid to improve the chiral recognition efficiency and/or the stability of the CSPs and their applications to the resolution of various primary and nonprimary amino compounds are reviewed. Chirality 27:576–588, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Access to Enantiomerically Pure cis‐ and trans‐β‐Phenylproline by High‐Performance Liquid Chromatography Resolution

The preparation of all four stereoisomers of the proline analog that bears a phenyl group attached to the β carbon either cis or trans to the carboxylic acid (cis‐ and trans‐β‐phenylproline, respectively) has been addressed. The methodology developed allows access to multigram quantities of the target amino acids in enantiomerically pure form and suitably protected for use in peptide synthesis. Racemic precursors of cis‐β‐phenylproline and trans‐β‐phenylproline were prepared from easily available starting materials and subjected to high‐performance liquid chromatography enantioseparation. Semipreparative columns (250 × 20 mm) containing chiral stationary phases based on amylose (Chiralpak IA) (Daicel‐Chiral Technologies Europe, Illkirch, France) or cellulose (Chiralpak IC) were used respectively for the resolution of the cis‐ and trans‐β‐phenylproline precursors. Chirality, 24:1082‐1091, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Enantioseparation and molecular modeling study of five β‐adrenergic blockers on Chiralpak IC column

A new high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method was developed for the enantiomeric resolution of five β‐adrenergic blockers on a Chiralpak IC column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5.0 μm particle size) in normal phase mode. The mobile phase used was n‐hexane‐ethanol‐diethylamine in different proportions at the flow rate of 1.0 mL/min with the column temperature of 25°C using a UV detector at 230 nm. The influences of base additives and alcohol modifiers were evaluated and optimized. The maximum resolution values for bevantolol, propranolol carteolol, esmolol, and metoprolol were 4.80, 2.77, 2.09, 2.30, and 1.11, respectively. To gain a better understanding of the interaction between chiral stationary phase and analyte enantiomers, the molecular docking of chiral stationary phase with five pairs of enantiomer was carried out using AutoDock molecular docking technique. By simulation studies, the mechanism of chiral recognition was determined. According to the results, hydrogen bond interactions and π‐π interactions were the chief interactions for the chiral recognition.