The use of visual cues in host evaluation by aphidiid wasps

We examined host evaluation behaviour in three species of aphid parasitoids, Ephedrus californicus Baker, Monoctonus paulensis (Ashmead), and Praon pequodorum Viereck (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). Mated females were provided with pairwise choices among three kinds of hosts in the laboratory: (green) pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris), and a green and a pink colour morph of alfalfa aphid, Macrosiphum creelii Davis. Patterns of attack and host acceptance were species-specific. Females of E. californicus did not respond to the presence of aphids prior to making antennal contact. Variations in rates of parasitization (pea aphid>green alfalfa aphid>pink alfalfa aphid) were consistent with differences in aphid defensive behaviours; no ‘preference’ for any host type was evident when aphids were anaesthetized with carbon dioxide. In M. paulensis, the order of preference (pea aphid>green alfalfa aphid>pink alfalfa aphid) did not vary when aphids were immobilized, or presented in the dark, or both. Host movement did not influence the rate of attack by M. paulensis. In contrast, the ranked order of preference in P. pequodorum varied with circumstance. In the light, females attacked pea aphid and green alfalfa aphid with equal frequency, but parasitized significantly more of the former; both kinds of aphids were attacked and parasitized at higher rates than pink alfalfa aphid. In the dark, P. pequodorum females parasitized green and pink alfalfa aphids equally and at higher rates than pea aphids. Whereas E. californicus was more successful ovipositing in immobilized hosts, P. pequodorum females attacked and laid more eggs in normal than anaesthetized aphids. Patterns of host recognition and evaluation are compared across six species representing four genera in the family Aphidiidae.     

The use of visual cues in host evaluation by aphidiid wasps I. Comparison between threeAphidius parasitoids of the pea aphid

Host evaluation behaviour was examined in three species of aphid parasitoids,Aphidius ervi haliday,A. pisivorus Smith, andA. smithi Sharma & Subba Rao (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). Parasitoids were provided under laboratory conditions with three kinds of hosts representing two aphid species: (green) pea aphid,Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris), and green and pink colour morphs of the alfalfa aphid,Macrosiphum creelii Davis. Females of all threeAphidius species distinguished between aphids on the basis of colour, movement, and host species. Patterns of host acceptance by parasitoids were species-specific. InA. ervi, host preference was the same in light and dark conditions: pea aphid>green alfalfa aphid≫pink alfalfa aphid. In contrast,A. pisivorus attacked and accepted pea aphid and green alfalfa aphid equally in the light and preferred both of these over pink alfalfa aphid; however, it made no distinction between pea aphid and pink alfalfa aphid in the dark. Females ofA. smithi attacked all three kinds of hosts (pea aphid>green alfalfa aphid≫pink alfalfa aphid) but apparently laid eggs only in pea aphid. The frequencies of attack and oviposition by all wasps were higher on ‘normal’ pea aphids than on those anaesthetized with CO₂. Host recognition is confirmed by chemical cues in the aphid cuticle that are detected during antennation, and host acceptance is dependent on an assessment of host quality during ovipositor probing.     

Patterns of host selection by four species of aphidiid (Hymenoptera) parasitoids: influence of host switching

Abstract.

• 1 We tested switching behaviour in four species of aphidiid parasitoids, using a two-aphid experimental system consisting of second-instar nymphs of pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris)) and alfalfa aphid (Macrosiphum creelii Davis) feeding on broad beans in the laboratory.
• 2 Aphidius ervi Haliday, A.pisivorus Smith, A.smithi Sharma & Subba Rao, and Pram pequodorum Viereck showed an innate preference for pea aphid when both host species were provided in equal numbers.
• 3 Wasps encountered both aphid species equally but differed in their acceptance of alfalfa aphid. Females of A.pisivorus and P.pequodorum accepted alfalfa aphids when few pea aphids were available, but A. smithi always concentrated attacks on pea aphid. Aphidius ervi super-parasitized an increasing proportion of pea aphids as their availability declined.
• 4 Switching to the alfalfa aphid occurred in A.ervi and P.pequodorum (but not in A.pisivorus and A.smithi) under the condition of a 1:3 ratio of pea aphids:alfalfa aphids. Wasps did not switch when more pea aphids than alfalfa aphids were provided (3:1 ratio).
• 5 Alfalfa aphids were more likely than pea aphids to escape from parasitoid attack.
• 6 Switching to the most abundant host may not be adaptive in these four species of aphid parasitoids. A foraging wasp incurs a potentially higher cost in lost opportunity time when attacking (and failing to oviposit in) alfalfa aphids. In addition, alfalfa aphids may have lower host quality than pea aphids, a difference that could influence offspring fitness.

     

EVOLUTION OF AN APHID-PARASITOID INTERACTION: VARIATION IN RESISTANCE TO PARASITISM AMONG APHID POPULATIONS SPECIALIZED ON DIFFERENT PLANTS

The evolution of associations between herbivorous insects and their parasitoids is likely to be influenced by the relationship between the herbivore and its host plants. If populations of specialized herbivorous insects are structured by their host plants such that populations on different hosts are genetically differentiated, then the traits affecting insect-parasitoid interactions may exhibit an associated structure. The pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum) is a herbivorous insect species comprised of genetically distinct groups that are specialized on different host plants (Via 1991a, 1994). Here, we examine how the genetic differentiation of pea aphid populations on different host plants affects their interaction with a parasitoid wasp, Aphidius ervi. We performed four experiments. (1) By exposing pea aphids from both alfalfa and clover to parasitoids from both crops, we demonstrate that pea aphid populations that are specialized on alfalfa are successfully parasitized less often than are populations specialized on clover. This difference in parasitism rate does not depend upon whether the wasps were collected from alfalfa or clover fields. (2) When we controlled for potential differences in aphid and parasitoid behavior between the two host plants and ensured that aphids were attacked, we found that pea aphids from alfalfa were still parasitized less often than pea aphids from clover. Thus, the difference in parasitism rates is not due to behavior of either aphids or wasps, but appears to be a physiologically based difference in resistance to parasitism. (3) Replicates of pea aphid clones reared on their own host plant and on a common host plant, fava bean, exhibited the same pattern of resistance as above. Thus, there do not appear to be nutritional or secondary chemical effects on the level of physiological resistance in the aphids due to feeding on clover or alfalfa, and therefore the difference in resistance on the two crops appears to be genetically based. (4) We assayed for genetic variation in resistance among individual pea aphid clones collected from clover fields and found no detectable genetic variation for resistance to parasitism within two populations sampled from clover. This is in contrast to Henter and Via's (1995) report of abundant genetic variation in resistance to this parasitoid within a pea aphid population on alfalfa. Low levels of genetic variation may be one factor that constrains the evolution of resistance to parasitism in the populations of pea aphids from clover, leading them to remain more susceptible than populations of the same species from alfalfa.     

Does variation in host plant association and symbiont infection of pea aphid populations induce genetic and behaviour differentiation of its main parasitoid, Aphidius ervi?

The host-associated differentiation (HAD) hypothesis states that higher trophic levels in parasitic associations should exhibit similar divergence in case of host sympatric speciation. We tested HAD on populations of Aphidius ervi the main parasitoid of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum, emerging from host populations specialized on either alfalfa or red clover. Host and parasitoid populations were assessed for genetic variation and structure, while considering geography, host plant and host aphid protective symbionts Regiella insecticola and Hamiltonella defensa as potential covariables. Cluster and hierarchical analyses were used to assess the contribution of these variables to population structure, based on genotyping pea aphids and associated A. ervi with microsatellites, and host aphid facultative symbionts with 16S rDNA markers. Pea aphid genotypes were clearly distributed in two groups closely corresponding with their plant origins, confirming strong plant associated differentiation of this aphid in North America. Overall parasitism by A. ervi averaged 21.5 % across samples, and many parasitized aphids producing a wasp hosted defensive bacteria, indicating partial or ineffective protective efficacy of these symbionts in the field. The A. ervi population genetic data failed to support differentiation according to the host plant association of their pea aphid host. Potential for parasitoid specialization was also explored in experiments where wasps from alfalfa and clover aphids were reciprocally transplanted on alternate hosts, the hypothesis being that wasp behaviour and parasitic stages should be most adapted to their host of origin. Results revealed higher probability of oviposition on the alfalfa aphids, but higher adult emergence success on red clover aphids, with no interaction as expected under HAD. We conclude that our study provides no support for the HAD in this system. We discuss factors that might impair A. ervi specialization on its divergent aphid hosts on alfalfa and clover.     

Host Age Preference Behavior in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Aphidius ervi</Emphasis> Haliday (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae)

Many parasitoid species have preference for certain stages of hosts to parasitize but the underlying behavioral mechanisms of such preference are still poorly understood, making it difficult to evaluate host-parasitoid interactions and their effects on the success of biological control programs. Here, we report our work on a parasitoid Aphidius ervi Haliday on the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris). We show that with the increase of host age, female parasitoids are more likely to encounter and to attack their hosts but the hosts develop increasingly greater defensive capabilities. Encounter almost always triggers attack attempt; however, increasing attack attempts do not proportionally lead to ovipositor probings and increasing ovipositor probings do not proportionally translate into ovipositions. These asymmetric responses may be interpreted as that A. ervi females prefer to parasitize older aphids for higher fitness return but those aphids can better defend themselves, and as a consequence, A. ervi females may achieve the highest gain by attacking aphids of intermediate ages. We suggest that A. ervi females forage in a manner consistent with the optimal foraging theory, trading off host handling time with fitness returns.     

Oviposition behaviour of the aphid parasitoid,Aphidius ervi: Are wet aphids recognized as host?

Females of the central European population of the aphid parasitoid, Aphidius ervi, did not attack wet pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum) that were washed previously with water. After 1 hour, this phenomenon disappeared and A. ervi attacked washed hosts to the same degree as dry ones. Similarly, A. ervi attacked dead aphids killed in liquid nitrogen readily if they were dry but not if they were wet. This effect was also reversible and disappeared after 1 h. When A. ervi females were foraging on broad beans (Vicia faba), they laid significantly more eggs into dry aphids than into wet aphids. Resource utilization of wet aphids, however, was significantly lower in this design than in Petri dishes, due to a changed drop-off behaviour of the aphid. We conclude that females did not use visual cues for host recognition but instead relied on chemical cues. These cues may be covered by a thin water layer directly after aphids became wet. Our results also demonstrate the importance of abiotic factors for the estimation of the reproductive success of parasitoids in the field.     

Presence of an unsuitable host diminishes the competitive superiority of an insect parasitoid: a distraction effect

Competitive interactions between parasitoid species are traditionally evaluated when they compete for a single host species. Yet, the presence of additional host species can alter competitive interactions, even if the host is unsuitable for parasitoid development. In alfalfa of the mid-western USA, a native parasitoid species, Praon pequodorum, was once a dominant natural enemy, but it has become rare since the introduction of another parasitoid, Aphidius ervi. Despite A. ervi’s competitive superiority for their most common host, the pea aphid Acyrthosiphum pisum, P. pequodorum still persists at low densities. We performed a suite of laboratory and field studies to determine if the presence of an alternative host, the spotted alfalfa aphid Therioaphis maculata, may mitigate A. ervi’s competitive superiority and facilitate P. pequodorum’s persistence. We show that spotted alfalfa aphids reduce the foraging efficiency of both parasitoid species for pea aphids, despite spotted alfalfa aphids being an unsuitable host. This decrease in efficiency, however, was not symmetrical; the presence of spotted alfalfa aphids had a greater detrimental effect on A. ervi foraging for pea aphids. This might facilitate the persistence of the competitively inferior P. pequodorum. Our study suggests that indirect effects generated by the presence of alternative hosts are important for understanding parasitoid–host dynamics and overall insect community structure.     

Parasitism byAphidius ervi (Hym.: Aphidiidae): Preference for pea aphid and blue alfalfa aphid (Hom.: Aphididae) and competition withA. Smithi

The pea aphidAcyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) and the blue alfalfa aphidA. kondoi Shinji are pests of alfalfaMedicago sativa L. worldwide. The parasitoidAphidium ervi Haliday attacks both species andA. smithi is host specific to pea aphid Experiments were conducted to determine the preference ofA. ervi forA. pisum andA. kondoi at three densities of hosts using the percentages of parasitism and superparasitism, and the distribution of eggs among hosts as criteria. Also examined was the outcome of competition between the two parasitoids when exposed to the same hosts. A. ervi attacks moreA. pisum when provided alone (no choice test) and when provided together in equal numbers withA. kondoi (choice test). There was no significant difference in the number of progeny produced by either parasitoid when a female of each species was introduced simultaneously into the same test unit containingA. pisum hosts. The effects of the pathogenPandora neoaphidis on this competition is reviewed.     

Larvicidal activity of lectins onLucilia cuprina: mechanism of action

Foraging behaviour and host-instar preference of young and old females of the solitary aphid parasitoid,Lysiphlebus cardui Marshall (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae), were studied in the laboratory. The analysis of interactions between parasitoids and different stages ofAphis fabae cirsiiacanthoidis Scop. (Homoptera: Aphididae) revealed that encounter rates between aphids and parasitoid females and defence reactions of the aphids influenced the degree to which a particular aphid age class is parasitized. Encounter rates between hosts and parasitoid females depended on the foraging pattern of the parasitoid, which varied with age. In mixed aphid colonies patch residence time increased with parasitoid age. Furthermore, younger parasitoids (≦1 day old) laid more eggs into second and third instars, while older parasitoids (≧4 days old) did not show distinct host instar preferences. It is suggested that the oviposition behaviour ofL. cardui is influenced by the physiological state, i.e. the age of the wasp.     

Altered behavior and distribution of pea aphids, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Homoptera: Aphididae), infected with Pandora neoaphidis (Zygomycetes: Entomophthorales)

The distribution and mobility of infected aphid hosts can have a great effect on the ability of a pathogen to spread throughout a population. The distribution of dead and living pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum) infected with Pandora neoaphidis was compared with that of their healthy conspecifics. Infected aphids were significantly more likely to be found on the undersides of alfalfa leaves and off of the plants than were healthy aphids. These two shifts in microhabitat location have potential costs and benefits for both the host and the pathogen.     

Interspecific Relations Between Two Sympatric Species of Hymenoptera, Dinarmus basalis (Rond) and Eupelmus vuilleti (Crw), Ectoparasitoids of the Bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus (F)

Dinarmus basalis (Rond) and Epelmus vuilleti (Crw) are two Hymenopteran species, which are solitary ectoparasitoids of bruchid larvae. In the presence of seeds of Vigna unguiculata (Walp) containing hosts parasitized by E. vuilleti, a high percentage of D. basalis females avoided multiparasitism whatever the age of the eggs or the larvae present on the host. The least avoidance was observed when the hosts were parasitized by E. vuilleti 30 min beforehand. This avoidance behavior is adaptive and is related to the low survival chances of the D. basalis larvae when they are in interspecific competition with E. vuilleti larvae. The analysis of the behavior of D. basalis demonstrated that the avoidance of multiparasitism could be due to the perception of two signals; an external signal deposited on the surface of the seeds during the E. vuilleti oviposition phase and an internal signal due to the presence of the eggs and larvae at the surface of the hosts. E. vuilleti females did not avoid multiparasitism and multiparasitized the hosts bearing D. basalis eggs or larvae. The behavior of E. vuilleti females was not disturbed by the presence of its competitor. Under these conditions of interspecific competition, the survival chances of E. vuilleti larvae were very high whatever the age of its competitor D. basalis. The two species of parasitoids could move in a column containing healthy seeds of V. unguiculata and patches with seeds containing parasitized or unparasitized larvae. The distribution of D. basalis females introduced into these columns depended on the host quality. They avoided the patches containing the hosts parasitized E. vuilleti and were found in the patches with healthy hosts. The behavior of E. vuilleti females was very different; the distribution of the females and the parasitism and multiparasitism rates were not affected by the quality of the hosts present in the patches. The adaptive significance of the behaviors of these two species was analyzed in relation to the survival chances of their offspring.     

Recognition of heterospecific parasitism: Competition between Aphidiid (Aphidius ervi) and Aphelinid (Aphelinus asychis) parasitoids of Aphids (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae; Aphelinidae)

The solitary parasitoids Aphidius erviHaliday (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae) and Aphelinus asychisWalker (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) attacked but generally did not oviposit in pea aphids parasitized by the other species. Wasps selectively oviposited in unparasitized hosts when given a choice. Host discrimination depended on the recognition of internal cues. Females of A. asychiseither could not recognize or ignored A. ervi'sexternal host marking pheromone. Under most conditions, A. ervisurvived in superparasitized hosts, killing competing A. asychislarvae by physical attack and possibly physiological suppression. The outcome of larval competition was not affected by oviposition sequence or age difference between larvae; A. asychissurvived only when it had substantially completed larval development before the host was superparasitized by A. ervi.It is suggested that competition for host resources incurs a cost, for the winner in terms of reduced size or increased development time and for the loser in terms of lost progeny and searching time. Consequently, heterospecific host discrimination can be functional. Internal, and probably general, cues enable wasps to recognize and avoid oviposition in hosts already parasitized by an unrelated species.     

Aphid population dynamics: does resistance to parasitism influence population size?

1. Insect population size is regulated by both intrinsic traits of organisms and extrinsic factors. The impacts of natural enemies are typically considered to be extrinsic factors, however insects have traits that affect their vulnerability to attack by natural enemies, and thus intrinsic and extrinsic factors can interact in their effects on population size. 2. Pea aphids Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in New York and Maryland that are specialised on alfalfa are approximately two times more physiologically resistant to parasitism by Aphidius ervi Haliday (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) than pea aphids specialised on clover. To assess the potential influence of this genetically based difference in resistance to parasitism on pea aphid population dynamics, pea aphids, A. ervi, and other natural enemies of aphids in clover and alfalfa fields were sampled. 3. Rates of successful parasitism by A. ervi were higher and pea aphid population sizes were lower in clover, where the aphids are less resistant to parasitism. In contrast, mortality due to a fungal pathogen of pea aphids was higher in alfalfa. Generalist aphid predators did not differ significantly in density between the crops. 4. To explore whether intrinsic resistance to parasitism influences field dynamics, the relationship between resistance and successful field parasitism in 12 populations was analysed. The average level of resistance of a population strongly predicts rates of successful parasitism in the field. The ability of the parasitoid to regulate the aphid may vary among pea aphid populations of different levels of resistance.     

Do past experience and competitive ability influence foraging strategies of parasitoids under interspecific competition?

Abstract 1. In solitary parasitoids, several species can exploit the same host patch and competition could potentially be a strong selective agent as only one individual can emerge from a host. In cereal crops, Aphidius rhopalosiphi and A. ervi share the grain aphid Sitobion avenae as host. 2. The present work studied foraging strategies of both species on patches already exploited by the other species. The study analysed larval competition in multi‐parasitised hosts and compared the foraging behaviour of females with and without previous experience. 3. It was found that A. ervi wins larval competition three times more often than A. rhopalosiphi. Both species spent less time on patches exploited by a heterospecific than on unexploited ones. When they foraged on heterospecifically exploited patches, experienced females induced less mortality in aphids than inexperienced ones. 4. Although A. rhopalosiphi is a specialist on cereal aphids and is the most abundant species due to its early appearance in the season, S. avenae is still a profitable host for A. ervi, because: (i) A. rhopalosiphi leaves patches partially exploited, (ii) A. ervi wins larval competition in three out of four multi‐parasitised hosts, and (iii) A. ervi is only slightly deterred by the cornicular secretions of the host and can thus easily parasitise hosts.     

Influence of Experience on the Response of Bathyplectes curculionis (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), a Nonaphidophagous Parasitoid, to Aphid Odor

Bathyplectes curculionis (Thomson) is an introduced natural enemy of the alfalfa weevil in North America. The wasp requires carbohydrate foods as an adult. Adult wasps have increased longevity and fecundity when provided access to pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris), honeydew in the laboratory, and adults respond positively to the presence of pea aphids in alfalfa fields. However, it is unknown how these wasps find aphid honeydew in the field. In a series of Y-tube olfactometer experiments, we evaluated the response of naïve and experienced adult female B. curculionis to odors from pea aphids, alfalfa, and pea aphids on alfalfa. Naïve adult females did not respond positively to pea aphid odor even when hungry. But adult females were able to learn aphid odor, and the mechanism of learning appears to be associative rather than by sensitization. Naïve females also showed no preference for alfalfa odor but learned alfalfa odor through sensitization. The wasps did not distinguish between alfalfa with aphids and alfalfa without aphids, even after exposure to aphids or alfalfa with aphids. However, they preferred pea aphid odor to alfalfa odor after a feeding experience in the presence of pea aphid odors. But after exposure to mixed odors of aphids and alfalfa while feeding, B. curculionis females preferred the odor of alfalfa to the odor of pea aphids. These results suggest that alfalfa odors mask or override aphid odors when aphids are associated with alfalfa (as happens naturally), thus interfering with the wasp's ability to respond to learned aphid odors. Therefore, although the wasps are capable of learning to find pea aphids and their honeydew in a simplified laboratory setting, it appears unlikely that they do so in the field.     

The Foraging Behavior of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Lysiphlebus fabarum</Emphasis> (Marshall), a Thelytokous Parasitoid of the Black Bean Aphid in Iran

A series of laboratory experiments examined the foraging behavior of a thelytokous strain of Lysiphlebus fabarum (Marshall), a strongly proovigenic parasitoid of Aphis fabae Scopoli, in Iran. Females use chemical camoflage to forage undisturbed in ant-tended aphid colonies and solicit honeydew from aphids in the manner of ants. Rates of oviposition are very low (∼ 1.2 eggs / h) despite many aphid encounters and persistent ovipositor probing which appears to prime aphids for subsequent honeydew solicitation. Starved females spent 3.6 times longer in host patches (leaf disks with 15 2nd–3rd instar A. fabae) than did females sated on honey, and 40% of this time was spent soliciting honeydew. Five d-old females spent longer in patches than did one d-old females, and parasitized three times as many aphids. A 24 h pre-trial foraging experience did not reduce mean egg load significantly compared to a one h experience, but was sufficient to reduce patch residence time and number of aphids parasitized. Wasps reared under short day conditions (L:D = 10:14) were more pessimistic foragers (remained longer in patches and parasitized more aphids) than females raised under long days (L:D = 16:8). Wasps that encountered aphids previously parasitized by conspecifics began to superparasitize and remained longer in patches than females that encountered only unparasitized aphids. Encounters with other females had no effect on foraging behavior, possibly because cuticular camoflage interferes with conspecific recognition. The exceptionally low oviposition rate of this wasp may reflect a life history in which individual fitness has evolved to be strongly dependent on continued ant attendance throughout the period of progeny development.     

Behavioural and physiological responses to conflicting oviposition stimuli in a synovigenic parasitoid

The behavioural and physiological responses of the synovigenic parasitoid, Dinarmus basalis (Rond.) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), were investigated whilst the wasps were submitted to conflicting oviposition stimuli: an environment which induced them to restrict egg-laying and a physiological factor, egg-load pressure, which induced them to lay eggs. When individual females depleted patches containing hosts parasitized 24 h or 72 h beforehand, they laid preferentially on unparasitized hosts and the number of eggs laid decreased significantly. Although they remained for several days in such patches, egg-load pressure did not lead them to modify their strategy (i.e. to accept all the available hosts including the already parasitized ones). In this synovigenic species, the oviposition constraint resulted in the retention of oocytes. Dissection and histological observation showed that the unlaid eggs are resorbed, a reproductive regulatory process which has seldom previously been reported in the presence of unparasitized hosts. This physiological response was induced by the mere presence of the parasitized hosts rather than their density. The females’ response was also influenced by the presence of conspecifics. They still avoided laying on parasitized hosts but the number of eggs laid daily became comparable to that observed in patches containing only unparasitized hosts. Thus, D. basalis females adapted their strategy in response to their environment, in which the most significant factor seemed to be the quality of the hosts provided, and their physiology. The originality and the importance of these results are discussed.     

Influence of aphid size,age and behaviour on host choice by the parasitoid wasp Ephedrus californicus: a test of host-size models

Summary When host quality varies, parasitoid wasps are expected to oviposit selectively in high-quality hosts. We tested the assumption underlying host-size models that, for solitary species of wasps, quality is based on host size. Using Ephedrus californicus, a solitary endoparasitoid of the pea aphid, we evaluated the influence of aphid size (= mass), age and defensive behaviours on host selection. Experienced parasitoid females were given a choice among three classes of 5-day-old apterous nymphs: small aphids that had been starved daily for 4 h (S4) and 6 h (S6) respectively, and large aphids permitted to feed (F) normally. Wasps attacked more, and laid more eggs in, small than large aphids (S6>S4>F). This rank-order for attack did not change when females could choose among aphids of the same size that differed in age; however, wasps oviposited in all attacked aphids with equal probability. Host size did not influence parasitoid attack rates when aphids were anaesthetized so that they could not escape or defend themselves. As predicted by host-size models, wasp size increased with host size (F>S4; S6), but large wasps required longer to complete development than their smaller counterparts (S4E. californicus reflects a trade-off between maximization of fitness gains per egg and the economics of search-time allocation. Because large aphids are more likely to escape parasitization, a wasp must balance her potential gain in fitness by ovipositinng in a high-quality (large) aphid against her potential cost in terms of lost opportunity time if the attack fails.     

3种寄主上桃蚜的选择性及形态分化

桃蚜是一种重要的农业害虫,寄主广泛,种下分化复杂。以采自黄土高原旱作区桃树、烟草、甘蓝上的桃蚜为研究对象,通过叶片选择法、传统比较形态测定法研究了3种寄主上桃蚜的选择性及形态分化。结果表明:在3种寄主同时存在的情况下,烟草上的桃蚜嗜食烟草,表现为63.5%的桃蚜选择烟草叶,13.8%选择甘蓝叶,8.2%选择桃叶,而甘蓝和桃树上的桃蚜对原寄主没有表现出明显的嗜好性;从形态指标来看,3种寄主上的桃蚜在体长、触角末节长度、后足腿节长度、触角与体长的比例方面存在显著差异(P0.05),说明这几个特征可以作为区分这3种寄主上桃蚜的依据。综合分析可以初步认为黄土高原旱作区烟草上的桃蚜可能形成了寄主专化型-烟草型。