HAPLESS13, the Arabidopsis μ1 Adaptin,Is Essential for Protein Sorting at the trans-Golgi Network/Early Endosome

In plant cells, secretory and endocytic routes intersect at the trans-Golgi network (TGN)/early endosome (EE), where cargos are further sorted correctly and in a timely manner. Cargo sorting is essential for plant survival and therefore necessitates complex molecular machinery. Adaptor proteins (APs) play key roles in this process by recruiting coat proteins and selecting cargos for different vesicle carriers. The µ1 subunit of AP-1 in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) was recently identified at the TGN/EE and shown to be essential for cytokinesis. However, little was known about other cellular activities affected by mutations in AP-1 or the developmental consequences of such mutations. We report here that HAPLESS13 (HAP13), the Arabidopsis µ1 adaptin, is essential for protein sorting at the TGN/EE. Functional loss of HAP13 displayed pleiotropic developmental defects, some of which were suggestive of disrupted auxin signaling. Consistent with this, the asymmetric localization of PIN-FORMED2 (PIN2), an auxin transporter, was compromised in the mutant. In addition, cell morphogenesis was disrupted. We further demonstrate that HAP13 is critical for brefeldin A-sensitive but wortmannin-insensitive post-Golgi trafficking. Our results show that HAP13 is a key link in the sophisticated trafficking network in plant cells.Plant cells contain sophisticated endomembrane compartments, including the endoplasmic reticulum, the Golgi, the trans-Golgi network (TGN)/early endosome (EE), the prevacuolar compartments/multivesicular bodies (PVC/MVB), various types of vesicles, and the plasma membrane (PM; Ebine and Ueda, 2009; Richter et al., 2009). Intracellular protein sorting between the various locations in the endomembrane system occurs in both secretory and endocytic routes (Richter et al., 2009; De Marcos Lousa et al., 2012). Vesicles in the secretory route start at the endoplasmic reticulum, passing through the Golgi before reaching the TGN/EE, while vesicles in the endocytic route start from the PM before reaching the TGN/EE (Dhonukshe et al., 2007; Viotti et al., 2010). The TGN/EE in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) is an independent and highly dynamic organelle transiently associated with the Golgi (Dettmer et al., 2006; Lam et al., 2007; Viotti et al., 2010), distinct from the animal TGN. Once reaching the TGN/EE, proteins delivered by their vesicle carriers are subject to further sorting, being incorporated either into vesicles that pass through the PVC/MVB before reaching the vacuole for degradation or into vesicles that enter the secretory pathway for delivery to the PM (Ebine and Ueda, 2009; Richter et al., 2009). Therefore, the TGN/EE is a critical sorting compartment that lies at the intersection of the secretory and endocytic routes.Fine-tuned control of intracellular protein sorting at the TGN/EE is essential for plant development (Geldner et al., 2003; Dhonukshe et al., 2007, 2008; Richter et al., 2007; Kitakura et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2013). An auxin gradient is crucial for pattern formation in plants, whose dynamic maintenance requires the polar localization of auxin efflux carrier PINs through endocytic recycling (Geldner et al., 2003; Blilou et al., 2005; Paciorek et al., 2005; Abas et al., 2006; Jaillais et al., 2006; Dhonukshe et al., 2007; Kleine-Vehn et al., 2008). Receptor-like kinases (RLKs) have also been recognized as major cargos undergoing endocytic trafficking, which are either recycled back to the PM or sent for vacuolar degradation (Geldner and Robatzek, 2008; Irani and Russinova, 2009). RLKs are involved in most if not all developmental processes of plants (De Smet et al., 2009).Intracellular protein sorting relies on sorting signals within cargo proteins and on the molecular machinery that recognizes sorting signals (Boehm and Bonifacino, 2001; Robinson, 2004; Dhonukshe et al., 2007). Adaptor proteins (AP) play a key role (Boehm and Bonifacino, 2001; Robinson, 2004) in the recognition of sorting signals. APs are heterotetrameric protein complexes composed of two large subunits (β and γ/α/δ/ε), a small subunit (σ), and a medium subunit (µ) that is crucial for cargo selection (Boehm and Bonifacino, 2001). APs associate with the cytoplasmic side of secretory and endocytic vesicles, recruiting coat proteins and recognizing sorting signals within cargo proteins for their incorporation into vesicle carriers (Boehm and Bonifacino, 2001). Five APs have been identified so far, classified by their components, subcellular localization, and function (Boehm and Bonifacino, 2001; Robinson, 2004; Hirst et al., 2011). Of the five APs, AP-1 associates with the TGN or recycling endosomes (RE) in yeast and mammals (Huang et al., 2001; Robinson, 2004), mediating the sorting of cargo proteins to compartments of the endosomal-lysosomal system or to the basolateral PM of polarized epithelial cells (Gonzalez and Rodriguez-Boulan, 2009). Knockouts of AP-1 components in multicellular organisms resulted in embryonic lethality (Boehm and Bonifacino, 2001; Robinson, 2004).We show here that the recently identified Arabidopsis µ1 adaptin AP1M2 (Park et al., 2013; Teh et al., 2013) is a key component in the cellular machinery mediating intracellular protein sorting at the TGN/EE. AP1M2 was previously named HAPLESS13 (HAP13), whose mutant allele hap13 showed male gametophytic lethality (Johnson et al., 2004). In recent quests for AP-1 in plants, HAP13/AP1M2 was confirmed as the Arabidopsis µ1 adaptin based on its interaction with other components of the AP-1 complex as well as its localization at the TGN (Park et al., 2013; Teh et al., 2013). A novel mutant allele of HAP13/AP1M2, ap1m2-1, was found to be defective in the intracellular distribution of KNOLLE, leading to defective cytokinesis (Park et al., 2013; Teh et al., 2013). However, it was not clear whether HAP13/AP1M2 mediated other cellular activities and their developmental consequences. Using the same mutant allele, we found that functional loss of HAP13 (hap13-1/ap1m2-1) resulted in a full spectrum of growth defects, suggestive of compromised auxin signaling and of defective RLK signaling. Cell morphogenesis was also disturbed in hap13-1. Importantly, hap13-1 was insensitive to brefeldin A (BFA) washout, indicative of defects in guanine nucleotide exchange factors for ADP-ribosylation factor (ArfGEF)-mediated post-Golgi trafficking. Furthermore, HAP13/AP1M2 showed evolutionarily conserved function during vacuolar fusion, providing additional support to its identity as a µ1 adaptin. These results demonstrate the importance of the Arabidopsis µ1 adaptin for intracellular protein sorting centered on the TGN/EE.     

Overexpression of BAX INHIBITOR-1 Links Plasma Membrane Microdomain Proteins to Stress

BAX INHIBITOR-1 (BI-1) is a cell death suppressor widely conserved in plants and animals. Overexpression of BI-1 enhances tolerance to stress-induced cell death in plant cells, although the molecular mechanism behind this enhancement is unclear. We recently found that Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) BI-1 is involved in the metabolism of sphingolipids, such as the synthesis of 2-hydroxy fatty acids, suggesting the involvement of sphingolipids in the cell death regulatory mechanism downstream of BI-1. Here, we show that BI-1 affects cell death-associated components localized in sphingolipid-enriched microdomains of the plasma membrane in rice (Oryza sativa) cells. The amount of 2-hydroxy fatty acid-containing glucosylceramide increased in the detergent-resistant membrane (DRM; a biochemical counterpart of plasma membrane microdomains) fraction obtained from BI-1-overexpressing rice cells. Comparative proteomics analysis showed quantitative changes of DRM proteins in BI-1-overexpressing cells. In particular, the protein abundance of FLOTILLIN HOMOLOG (FLOT) and HYPERSENSITIVE-INDUCED REACTION PROTEIN3 (HIR3) markedly decreased in DRM of BI-1-overexpressing cells. Loss-of-function analysis demonstrated that FLOT and HIR3 are required for cell death by oxidative stress and salicylic acid, suggesting that the decreased levels of these proteins directly contribute to the stress-tolerant phenotypes in BI-1-overexpressing rice cells. These findings provide a novel biological implication of plant membrane microdomains in stress-induced cell death, which is negatively modulated by BI-1 overexpression via decreasing the abundance of a set of key proteins involved in cell death.BAX INHIBITOR-1 (BI-1) is an endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-based cell death suppressor widely conserved in plants and animals (Xu and Reed, 1998; Kawai et al., 1999). In plants, BI-1 is considered a stress-associated factor, since its expression is stimulated by various stresses (Sanchez et al., 2000; Kawai-Yamada et al., 2001; Matsumura et al., 2003; Watanabe and Lam, 2006; Isbat et al., 2009). Although plants lack the homolog of animal BAX as an inducer of programmed cell death, loss of BI-1 expression results in a severe cell death phenotype under stress conditions, such as fumonisin B1-induced ER stress and disturbance of ion homeostasis (Watanabe and Lam, 2006; Ihara-Ohori et al., 2007). Conversely, plants overexpressing BI-1 exhibit tolerance to cell death induced by various stresses (Kawai-Yamada et al., 2001, 2004; Matsumura et al., 2003; Ihara-Ohori et al., 2007; Watanabe and Lam, 2008; Ishikawa et al., 2010). Moreover, BI-1 overexpression confers not only tolerance to oxidative stress-mediated cell death but also enhanced metabolic acclimation involved in energy and redox balance (Ishikawa et al., 2010). The results of these studies indicate that plant BI-1 is potentially useful for engineering stress-tolerant plants. However, little is known about the mode of action of BI-1 in the cell death regulatory pathway (Ishikawa et al., 2011). While overexpression systems sometimes include artificial or off-site effects, the observation that BI-1 overexpression improves stress tolerance suggests the importance of dissecting plants overexpressing it to further address the molecular basis of BI-1 function and cell death and stress tolerance management.As another approach to understand the molecular function of BI-1, screening of candidates interacting biochemically or functionally with BI-1 has been performed. First, Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) BI-1 was confirmed to bind to calmodulin, like barley (Hordeum vulgare) MLO protein, a membrane-bound cell death regulator (Kim et al., 2002; Ihara-Ohori et al., 2007). Since the calmodulin-binding ability of BI-1 and MLO is necessary for their cell death-suppressing activity, Ca²⁺ signaling is critically involved in BI-1- and MLO-mediated cell death regulation (Kim et al., 2002; Kawai-Yamada et al., 2009). More recently, it was also demonstrated that the cell death suppression by BI-1 is mediated, at least in part, through fatty acid hydroxylase (FAH) in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae ectopic expression system (Nagano et al., 2009). In addition, Arabidopsis FAHs (AtFAH1 and AtFAH2) interact with BI-1 via cytochrome b₅ at the ER, resulting in the accumulation of 2-hydroxy fatty acids (2-HFAs) in Arabidopsis plants overexpressing BI-1. 2-HFAs are typical components of the ceramide backbone of sphingolipids (Imai et al., 1995; Pata et al., 2010). Although many functions of plant sphingolipids remain to be elucidated, accumulating evidence clearly indicates that sphingolipids and their metabolism are closely involved in cell death regulation and various stress responses in plants (Ng et al., 2001; Liang et al., 2003; Townley et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2008, 2012; Wang et al., 2008; Saucedo-García et al., 2011; Dutilleul et al., 2012; Kӧnig et al., 2012; Nagano et al., 2012; Mortimer et al., 2013), implying that BI-1 plays a role in cell death regulation through sphingolipid metabolism. Sphingolipids are major components of membrane lipids and are at particularly high concentrations in membrane microdomains, known as lipid rafts in animal cells, which are essential for membrane-mediated signaling and act as a sorting platform for targeted protein traffic (Simons and Toomre, 2000; Staubach and Hanisch, 2011). In mammalian cells, sphingomyelin metabolism in lipid rafts plays a vital role in the initiation of apoptotic cell death (Milhas et al., 2010). Recent studies have demonstrated the presence of raft-like membrane microdomains in plant cells and a role for them in defense responses and targeted protein sorting (Peskan et al., 2000; Fujiwara et al., 2009; Minami et al., 2009; Melser et al., 2010; Markham et al., 2011).This study focused on membrane microdomains in relation to BI-1-mediated sphingolipid metabolism. Our findings indicated that BI-1 alters sphingolipid composition in membrane microdomains, and this is accompanied by dynamic changes in a number of detergent-resistant membrane (DRM) proteins involved in cell death regulation.     

Alternative Splicing-Mediated Targeting of the Arabidopsis GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR3.5 to Mitochondria Affects Organelle Morphology

Since the discovery of 20 genes encoding for putative ionotropic glutamate receptors in the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genome, there has been considerable interest in uncovering their physiological functions. For many of these receptors, neither their channel formation and/or physiological roles nor their localization within the plant cells is known. Here, we provide, to our knowledge, new information about in vivo protein localization and give insight into the biological roles of the so-far uncharacterized Arabidopsis GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR3.5 (AtGLR3.5), a member of subfamily 3 of plant glutamate receptors. Using the pGREAT vector designed for the expression of fusion proteins in plants, we show that a splicing variant of AtGLR3.5 targets the inner mitochondrial membrane, while the other variant localizes to chloroplasts. Mitochondria of knockout or silenced plants showed a strikingly altered ultrastructure, lack of cristae, and swelling. Furthermore, using a genetically encoded mitochondria-targeted calcium probe, we measured a slightly reduced mitochondrial calcium uptake capacity in the knockout mutant. These observations indicate a functional expression of AtGLR3.5 in this organelle. Furthermore, AtGLR3.5-less mutant plants undergo anticipated senescence. Our data thus represent, to our knowledge, the first evidence of splicing-regulated organellar targeting of a plant ion channel and identify the first cation channel in plant mitochondria from a molecular point of view.In vertebrates, ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs in animals) are ligand-gated cation channels that mediate the majority of the excitatory neurotransmission in the central nervous system (Dingledine et al., 1999). In the model plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), 20 genes encoding homologs of animal iGluRs have been identified (Lam et al., 1998). According to phylogenetic analyses, the Arabidopsis GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR (AtGLR) homologs can be subdivided into three separate subgroups (Chiu et al., 1999, 2002). Some evidence for the channel-forming ability by plant ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGLRs) has been obtained only recently, and only for AtGLR3.4 and AtGLR1.4 expressed in heterologous systems (Vincill et al., 2012; Tapken et al., 2013). Studies with transgenic plants suggested roles of members of the plant GLR family in Ca²⁺ fluxes (AtGLR2; Kim et al., 2001), coordination of mitotic activity in the root apical meristem (Li et al., 2006), regulation of abscisic acid biosynthesis and water balance (AtGLR1.1; Kang and Turano, 2003; Kang et al., 2004), carbon/nitrogen sensing (AtGLR1.1; Kang and Turano, 2003), resistance against fungal infection (Kang et al., 2006), leaf-to-leaf wound signaling (Mousavi et al., 2013), and lateral root initiation (Vincill et al., 2013). Application of antagonists and agonists of animal iGluRs revealed that plant GLRs might be involved in the regulation of root growth and branching (Walch-Liu et al., 2006), in light signal transduction (Lam et al., 1998), and in the response to aluminum (Sivaguru et al., 2003). In various plant cell types, the agonists Glu- and Gly-induced plasma membrane depolarization and a rise in intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration that were inhibited by blockers of nonselective cation channels (NSCCs) and by antagonists of animal iGluRs (Dennison and Spalding, 2000; Dubos et al., 2003; Meyerhoff et al., 2005; Krol et al., 2007; Kwaaitaal et al., 2011; Michard et al., 2011). Furthermore, Glu-activated cation currents in patch-clamped root protoplasts were inhibited by NSCC blockers such as La³⁺ and Gd³⁺ (Demidchik et al., 2004). Therefore, it was proposed that plant iGLRs can form Ca²⁺-permeable NSCCs, are inhibited by animal iGluR antagonists, and might contribute to the shaping of plant Ca²⁺ signaling (McAinsh and Pittman, 2009). Studies using AtGLR3.3 mutant plants showed that intracellular Ca²⁺ rise and membrane depolarization induced by Glu in Arabidopsis hypocotyls and root cells are correlated with the presence of AtGLR3.3 (Qi et al., 2006; Stephens et al., 2008).However, most plant iGLRs, when expressed in heterologous systems, do not give rise to any current (e.g. in Xenopus spp. oocytes) or are toxic to host cells (e.g. in mammalian cells; Davenport, 2002). Recently, to examine whether AtGLR homologs possess functional ion channel domains, Tapken and Hollmann (2008) transplanted the pore loop together with two adjacent intracellular loops of 17 AtGLR subunits into two rat iGluR subunits and tested the resulting chimeric receptors for ion channel activity in the heterologous expression system Xenopus spp. oocyte. They showed that AtGLR1.1 and AtGLR1.4 have functional ion pore domains. The AtGLR1.1 pores are permeable to Na⁺, K⁺, and Ca²⁺ and are blocked by the nonspecific cation channel blocker La³⁺ (Tapken and Hollmann, 2008). Recent work has demonstrated that the expression of full-length AtGLR1.4 in oocytes gives rise to an amino acid-activated, nonselective, calcium-permeable channel that was found to be inhibited by the animal iGluR modulators 6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione and 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (Tapken et al., 2013).The study of these channels has so far been restricted to those members that are located in the plasma membrane and were proved to be functional in the expression systems used. Instead, various localization prediction tools suggest that some of the plant GLRs might have chloroplast and mitochondrial targeting. In general, determining the subcellular localization of a protein is an important step toward understanding its function. We recently reported the localization of GLR3.4 to the inner chloroplast membrane (Teardo et al., 2011), which was also shown to harbor a 6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione-sensitive, calcium-permeable channel activity (Teardo et al., 2010). No other studies have addressed the eventual subcellular localization of other putative Glu receptors.In this work, we show that an isoform of GLR3.5 is efficiently targeted to the mitochondria. Functional expression of the channel in this organelle is indicated by the fact that its absence in knockout plants leads to a dramatically altered ultrastructure of mitochondria that impacts the plant physiology, ultimately leading to an anticipated senescence.     

Multiscale Metabolic Modeling: Dynamic Flux Balance Analysis on a Whole-Plant Scale

Plant metabolism is characterized by a unique complexity on the cellular, tissue, and organ levels. On a whole-plant scale, changing source and sink relations accompanying plant development add another level of complexity to metabolism. With the aim of achieving a spatiotemporal resolution of source-sink interactions in crop plant metabolism, a multiscale metabolic modeling (MMM) approach was applied that integrates static organ-specific models with a whole-plant dynamic model. Allowing for a dynamic flux balance analysis on a whole-plant scale, the MMM approach was used to decipher the metabolic behavior of source and sink organs during the generative phase of the barley (Hordeum vulgare) plant. It reveals a sink-to-source shift of the barley stem caused by the senescence-related decrease in leaf source capacity, which is not sufficient to meet the nutrient requirements of sink organs such as the growing seed. The MMM platform represents a novel approach for the in silico analysis of metabolism on a whole-plant level, allowing for a systemic, spatiotemporally resolved understanding of metabolic processes involved in carbon partitioning, thus providing a novel tool for studying yield stability and crop improvement.Plants are of vital significance as a source of food (Grusak and DellaPenna, 1999; Rogalski and Carrer, 2011), feed (Lu et al., 2011), energy (Tilman et al., 2006; Parmar et al., 2011), and feedstocks for the chemical industry (Metzger and Bornscheuer, 2006; Kinghorn et al., 2011). Given the close connection between plant metabolism and the usability of plant products, there is a growing interest in understanding and predicting the behavior and regulation of plant metabolic processes. In order to increase crop quality and yield, there is a need for methods guiding the rational redesign of the plant metabolic network (Schwender, 2009).Mathematical modeling of plant metabolism offers new approaches to understand, predict, and modify complex plant metabolic processes. In plant research, the issue of metabolic modeling is constantly gaining attention, and different modeling approaches applied to plant metabolism exist, ranging from highly detailed quantitative to less complex qualitative approaches (for review, see Giersch, 2000; Morgan and Rhodes, 2002; Poolman et al., 2004; Rios-Estepa and Lange, 2007).A widely used modeling approach is flux balance analysis (FBA), which allows the prediction of metabolic capabilities and steady-state fluxes under different environmental and genetic backgrounds using (non)linear optimization (Orth et al., 2010). Assuming steady-state conditions, FBA has the advantage of not requiring the knowledge of kinetic parameters and, therefore, can be applied to model detailed, large-scale systems. In recent years, the FBA approach has been applied to several different plant species, such as maize (Zea mays; Dal’Molin et al., 2010; Saha et al., 2011), barley (Hordeum vulgare; Grafahrend-Belau et al., 2009b; Melkus et al., 2011; Rolletschek et al., 2011), rice (Oryza sativa; Lakshmanan et al., 2013), Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Poolman et al., 2009; de Oliveira Dal’Molin et al., 2010; Radrich et al., 2010; Williams et al., 2010; Mintz-Oron et al., 2012; Cheung et al., 2013), and rapeseed (Brassica napus; Hay and Schwender, 2011a, 2011b; Pilalis et al., 2011), as well as algae (Boyle and Morgan, 2009; Cogne et al., 2011; Dal’Molin et al., 2011) and photoautotrophic bacteria (Knoop et al., 2010; Montagud et al., 2010; Boyle and Morgan, 2011). These models have been used to study different aspects of metabolism, including the prediction of optimal metabolic yields and energy efficiencies (Dal’Molin et al., 2010; Boyle and Morgan, 2011), changes in flux under different environmental and genetic backgrounds (Grafahrend-Belau et al., 2009b; Dal’Molin et al., 2010; Melkus et al., 2011), and nonintuitive metabolic pathways that merit subsequent experimental investigations (Poolman et al., 2009; Knoop et al., 2010; Rolletschek et al., 2011). Although FBA of plant metabolic models was shown to be capable of reproducing experimentally determined flux distributions (Williams et al., 2010; Hay and Schwender, 2011b) and generating new insights into metabolic behavior, capacities, and efficiencies (Sweetlove and Ratcliffe, 2011), challenges remain to advance the utility and predictive power of the models.Given that many plant metabolic functions are based on interactions between different subcellular compartments, cell types, tissues, and organs, the reconstruction of organ-specific models and the integration of these models into interacting multiorgan and/or whole-plant models is a prerequisite to get insight into complex plant metabolic processes organized on a whole-plant scale (e.g. source-sink interactions). Almost all FBA models of plant metabolism are restricted to one cell type (Boyle and Morgan, 2009; Knoop et al., 2010; Montagud et al., 2010; Cogne et al., 2011; Dal’Molin et al., 2011), one tissue or one organ (Grafahrend-Belau et al., 2009b; Hay and Schwender, 2011a, 2011b; Pilalis et al., 2011; Mintz-Oron et al., 2012), and only one model exists taking into account the interaction between two cell types by specifying the interaction between mesophyll and bundle sheath cells in C4 photosynthesis (Dal’Molin et al., 2010). So far, no model representing metabolism at the whole-plant scale exists.Considering whole-plant metabolism raises the problem of taking into account temporal and environmental changes in metabolism during plant development and growth. Although classical static FBA is unable to predict the dynamics of metabolic processes, as the network analysis is based on steady-state solutions, time-dependent processes can be taken into account by extending the classical static FBA to a dynamic flux balance analysis (dFBA), as proposed by Mahadevan et al. (2002). The static (SOA) and dynamic optimization approaches introduced in this work provide a framework for analyzing the transience of metabolism by integrating kinetic expressions to dynamically constrain exchange fluxes. Due to the requirement of knowing or estimating a large number of kinetic parameters, so far dFBA has only been applied to a plant metabolic model once, to study the photosynthetic metabolism in the chloroplasts of C3 plants by a simplified model of five biochemical reactions (Luo et al., 2009). Integrating a dynamic model into a static FBA model is an alternative approach to perform dFBA.In this study, a multiscale metabolic modeling (MMM) approach was applied with the aim of achieving a spatiotemporal resolution of cereal crop plant metabolism. To provide a framework for the in silico analysis of the metabolic dynamics of barley on a whole-plant scale, the MMM approach integrates a static multiorgan FBA model and a dynamic whole-plant multiscale functional plant model (FPM) to perform dFBA. The performance of the novel whole-plant MMM approach was tested by studying source-sink interactions during the seed developmental phase of barley plants.     

AtGEN1 and AtSEND1, Two Paralogs in Arabidopsis,Possess Holliday Junction Resolvase Activity

Holliday junctions (HJs) are physical links between homologous DNA molecules that arise as central intermediary structures during homologous recombination and repair in meiotic and somatic cells. It is necessary for these structures to be resolved to ensure correct chromosome segregation and other functions. In eukaryotes, including plants, homologs of a gene called XPG-like endonuclease1 (GEN1) have been identified that process HJs in a manner analogous to the HJ resolvases of phages, archaea, and bacteria. Here, we report that Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), a eukaryotic organism, has two functional GEN1 homologs instead of one. Like all known eukaryotic resolvases, AtGEN1 and Arabidopsis single-strand DNA endonuclease1 both belong to class IV of the Rad2/XPG family of nucleases. Their resolvase activity shares the characteristics of the Escherichia coli radiation and UV sensitive C paradigm for resolvases, which involves resolving HJs by symmetrically oriented incisions in two opposing strands. This leads to ligatable products without the need for further processing. The observation that the sequence context influences the cleavage by the enzymes can be interpreted as a hint for the existence of sequence specificity. The two Arabidopsis paralogs differ in their preferred sequences. The precise cleavage positions observed for the resolution of mobile nicked HJs suggest that these cleavage positions are determined by both the substrate structure and the sequence context at the junction point.To counter the effects of endogenous and exogenous factors that threaten the genome integrity, efficient mechanisms have evolved to ensure the faithful transmission of genetic information (Tuteja et al., 2001). Double-strand breaks, induced by conditions such as ionizing radiation or replication fork (RF) stalling, are among the most deleterious lesions (Jackson and Bartek, 2009). To protect the genome from consequences of these lesions, the cells have ancient double-strand break repair mechanisms, including the homologous recombination (HR) pathway. The HR mechanism is also of great importance in the intentional genetic recombination during sexual reproduction. A key intermediate in HR is the so-called Holliday junction (HJ), a structure that was first suggested in the context of a gene conversion model in fungi (Holliday, 1964) and later shown to arise in somatic and meiotic cells (Szostak et al., 1983; Schwacha and Kleckner, 1995; Cromie et al., 2006; Bzymek et al., 2010).HJs are structures consisting of four DNA strands of two homologous DNA helices (e.g. homologous chromosomes or sister chromatids). They arise through invasion of one single strand from each of two helices into the other double strand. This results in two continuous strands (one per helix) and two strands that cross from one helix into the other. Schematics often depict the HJs with a parallel orientation of the helices, in which the crossing strands cross each other as was originally postulated (Holliday, 1964). However, HJs based on oligonucleotides have been shown to adopt an antiparallel conformation (for review, see Lilley, 2000). In this configuration, the junction resembles the letter H in a lateral view, and the crossing strands actually perform U turns. The crossing strands represent physical links between the two DNA strands involved. If a RF is restored by HR-mediated repair during mitosis, the resulting HJ usually involves the two sister chromatids of one chromosome (Li and Heyer, 2008). In meiosis, the physical links in the shape of HJs arise because of meiotic crossover between homologous chromosomes. In either case, these links must be resolved to ensure unperturbed cell survival.The importance of resolving the HJs for the survival of cells and organisms is highlighted by the phenotypes described for mutants defective for the known pathways of HJ resolution. One of these pathways is the resolution by canonical HJ resolvases, enzymes that cleave the two opposing strands of a HJ in perfectly symmetric positions relative to the junction point, which results in readily ligatable nicked duplex (nD) products (Svendsen and Harper, 2010). This property distinguishes the canonical HJ resolvases from the noncanonical resolvases (see below).The main resolvase of Escherichia coli is radiation and UV sensitive C (RuvC), which is part of the E. coli resolvasome (RuvABC complex; Otsuji et al., 1974; Sharples et al., 1990, 1999). In this complex, a HJ is sandwiched between two RuvA tetramers (Panyutin and Hsieh, 1994). Two RuvB complexes form ATP-dependent motors of branch migration, with two opposing helical arms of the junction threaded through their central openings. For the resolution of the HJ, one RuvA tetramer is replaced by a RuvC homodimer. This homodimer positions two active sites at the center of the junction that are poised to cleave the junction point if a preferred consensus sequence of the form 5′-(A/T)TT^↓(G/C)-3′ is encountered. The requirement for this correct sequence is quite strict; even a single base change can lead to a drastic reduction of the cleavage efficiency (Shah et al., 1994). Isolated EcRuvC is also active in vitro and binds only HJ structures with high specificity. This binding is independent of the sequence context, but the cleavage depends on the specific sequence (Iwasaki et al., 1991; Benson and West, 1994; Dunderdale et al., 1994). The exact cleavage position has been determined to be either one nucleotide 3′ or 5′ from the junction or at the junction point (Bennett and West, 1996; Shida et al., 1996; Osman et al., 2009). The well-characterized EcRuvC is often referred to as a paradigm of canonical HJ resolution.Eukaryotes have evolved a more complex interplay of different HJ resolution pathways (Schwartz and Heyer, 2011; Zakharyevich et al., 2012). A defined complex, consisting of a recombination deficiency Q (RecQ) helicase (AtRECQ4A in Arabidopsis [Arabidopsis thaliana], Bloom syndrome protein in human, and Slow growth suppression1 (Sgs1) in yeast [Saccharomyces cerevisiae]), a type IA topoisomerase (DNA topoisomerase 3-alpha [TOP3A] in Arabidopsis, HsTOPOIIIα in human, and ScTop3 in yeast), and the structural protein RecQ-mediated genome instability1 (AtRMI1 in Arabidopsis, HsRMI1 in human, and ScRmi1 in yeast; RTR complex), mediates the so-called dissolution pathway. The crossing points of a double HJ are brought together by branch migration catalyzed by the helicase followed by decatenation catalyzed by the topoisomerase (Wu and Hickson, 2003; Hartung et al., 2007a, 2008; Mankouri and Hickson, 2007; Yang et al., 2010). In addition to the catalytic activities, a functional RTR complex also requires structural functions based on protein-protein interactions, for which RMI1 plays an essential role (Mullen et al., 2005; Chen and Brill, 2007; Bonnet et al., 2013; Schröpfer et al., 2014). Dissolution leads to noncross-over products and therefore, is a major mechanism in somatic yeast cells (Gangloff et al., 1994; Ira et al., 2003; Matos et al., 2011). In Arabidopsis, the loss of RTR component function leads to elevated rates of HR as well as sensitivity to UV light and methylmethane sulfonate (MMS; Bagherieh-Najjar et al., 2005; Hartung et al., 2007a; Bonnet et al., 2013). Mutants of AtRMI1 and AtTOP3A exhibit severe and unique meiotic phenotypes (Chelysheva et al., 2008; Hartung et al., 2008). This meiosis I arrest is dependent on HR, but the exact nature of the recombination intermediates that are involved remains unclear (Li et al., 2004; Hartung et al., 2007b; Knoll et al., 2014).Dissolution acts in parallel with a second pathway mediated by the structure-specific endonuclease MMS and UV-sensitive protein81 (MUS81) as shown by the fact that the additional mutation of ScSgs1/AtRECQ4A leads to synthetic lethality (Mullen et al., 2001; Hartung et al., 2006; Mannuss et al., 2010). Single mutants of MUS81 in yeast, human, Drosophila melanogaster, and Arabidopsis are sensitive to DNA-damaging agents that perturb RFs and show reduced HR after induction of double-strand breaks (Boddy et al., 2001; Hanada et al., 2006; Hartung et al., 2006). The MUS81 homologs form heterodimers with the noncatalytic subunit essential meiotic endonuclease1 (EME1; ScMms4 in S. cerevisiae). SpMus81-Eme1 was, to our knowledge, the first nuclear endonuclease reported to be capable of resolving HJs (Boddy et al., 2001). The Arabidopsis complexes can be formed with the two different subunits: AtEME1A or AtEME1B (Geuting et al., 2009). AtMUS81-EME1A/B, like the fission yeast ortholog, preferentially cleaves nicked Holliday junctions (nHJs) and 3′-flaps but also shows weaker activity on intact HJs in vitro (Boddy et al., 2001; Osman et al., 2003; Geuting et al., 2009; Schwartz and Heyer, 2011). MUS81 homologs are key players in meiotic cross-over generation (Osman et al., 2003; Berchowitz et al., 2007; Higgins et al., 2008). Although cross-over formation is solely dependent on SpMus81 in fission yeast, this function was shown to be shared with ScYen1 in budding yeast (Osman et al., 2003; Blanco et al., 2010; Ho et al., 2010; Tay and Wu, 2010). Tightly regulated by cell division cycle5-dependent hyperphosphorylation at the end of prophase I, the main activity of ScMus81-Mms4 is timed to coordinate with the formation of chiasmata and HJs that link the homologous chromosomes. This role in meiosis I is shown by the failure of chromosome segregation at the end of meiosis I in ScMus81 mutants (Matos et al., 2011). Interestingly, the chromosomes could be segregated at the end of meiosis II because of the presence of ScYen1. In contrast to canonical HJ resolvases, the hallmark of the MUS81-EME1 cleavage mechanism is the asymmetry of the second incision relative to either a first incision or a preexisting nick. This difference classifies MUS81-EME1 as a noncanonical resolvase. Its products need additional processing by gap-filling or flap-cleaving enzymes to allow religation (Boddy et al., 2001; Geuting et al., 2009).In very recent studies, HsMUS81-EME1 was found to constitute an essential canonical HJ resolvase with HsSLX1-SLX4 (SLX for synthetic lethal of unknown function), in which a first incision is made by HsSLX1-SLX4 followed by the enhanced action of the HsMUS81-EME1 subunits on the resulting nHJ (Garner et al., 2013; Wyatt et al., 2013). HsSLX1-SLX4 had previously been described as a canonical resolvase, albeit producing only a low level of symmetrically cut ligatable products (Fekairi et al., 2009).In addition to the mechanisms described above, an activity resembling that of EcRuvC had long been known to be present in mammalian cell-free extracts. In 2008, the group of Steven C. West succeeded in identifying, to their knowledge, the first nuclear proteins analogous to the EcRuvC paradigm: ScYen1 and Homo sapiens XPG-like endonuclease1 (HsGEN1; Ip et al., 2008). These proteins are members of the large and well-characterized Rad2/XPG family of nucleases. The Rad2/XPG family consists of the Xeroderma pigmentosum group G-complementing protein (XPG) endonucleases of the nucleotide excision repair (class I), the flap endonuclease1 (FEN1) replication-associated flap endonucleases (class II), the exodeoxyribonuclease1 (EXO1) exonucleases of recombination and repair (class III), and class IV (containing the [putative] eukaryotic HJ resolvases). This last class was introduced after the identification of the rice (Oryza sativa) single-strand DNA endonuclease1 (OsSEND-1) based on sequence homology. The class IV members show a domain composition homologous to FEN1 and EXO1, with no spacer region between their N-terminal XPG (XPG-N) and internal XPG (XPG-I) domains, whereas the primary structure of these domains is more similar to the sequence of the nuclease domain of XPG (Furukawa et al., 2003).Although all Rad2/XPG homologs share a common cleavage mechanism as observed for the typical 5′-flap substrate (Tsutakawa et al., 2011; Tsutakawa and Tainer, 2012), the striking evolutionary difference between classes I, II, and III on the one hand and the HJ resolvases (class IV) on the other hand is the ability of class IV members to form homodimers in vitro at their preferred substrate, the HJs (Rass et al., 2010). The homodimer configuration ensures the presence of two active sites positioned on the opposing strands of the HJ, which is necessary for resolution. The mode of eukaryotic HJ resolution is largely similar to the bacterial paradigm: (1) cleavage occurs one nucleotide in the 3′ direction of a static junction point (equivalent to the main cleavage site on 5′-flaps), (2) the incisions occur with almost perfect point symmetry, (3) the incisions result in readily ligatable nDs, and (4) certain sites within a migratable HJ core are preferred, providing evidence for a (yet to be determined) sequence specificity (Ip et al., 2008; Bailly et al., 2010; Rass et al., 2010; Yang et al., 2012).In the absence of MUS81-EME1/Mms4, the proteins HsGEN1, ScYen1, and CeGEN-1 have been shown to play a role in response to replication-associated perturbations, such as MMS- and UV-induced DNA damage (Bailly et al., 2010; Blanco et al., 2010; Tay and Wu, 2010; Gao et al., 2012; Muñoz-Galván et al., 2012). It is also likely that these proteins provide a backup mechanism in mitosis and meiosis, ensuring proper chromosome segregation after a failure of other mechanisms, including MUS81-EME1/Mms4 (Blanco et al., 2010; Matos et al., 2011).Although canonical HJ resolvases in animals and fungi are a current topic of great interest, very little is known about these proteins in plants. In rice, two members of the Rad2/XPG class IV have been described: OsSEND-1 (the founding member) and OsGEN-like (OsGEN-L). OsSEND-1 was shown to digest single-stranded circular DNA, and its expression is induced on MMS-induced genotoxic stress, whereas OsGEN-L is implicated in late spore development (Furukawa et al., 2003; Moritoh et al., 2005). Both studies (Furukawa et al., 2003; Moritoh et al., 2005) proposed putative homologs in other plants, and the gene locus At1g01880 of Arabidopsis, coding for the protein AtGEN1, is considered the ortholog of HsGEN1 and ScYen1 (Ip et al., 2008). However, currently, only OsGEN-L has been further investigated and described to possess in vitro properties similar to both Rad2/XPG nucleases and EcRuvC. This protein shows a well-defined 5′-flap activity as well as a poorly characterized ability, similar to that of EcRuvC, to resolve mobile HJs (Yang et al., 2012).Thus, of two members of Rad2/XPG class IV of plants, only one member has so far been analyzed with respect to a possible HJ resolvase activity. However, Arabidopsis expression data show that both proteins are expressed in plants and do not reveal marked differences (Laubinger et al., 2008). In this study, the goal was, therefore, to characterize the in vitro activities of not only AtGEN1 but also, AtSEND1, focusing on the idea that Arabidopsis and (seed) plants in general might encode not one but actually two HJ resolvases with functional homology to EcRuvC.     

Focus Issue on the Plant Physiology of Global Change: A Nitrogen-Regulated Glutamine Amidotransferase (GAT1_2.1) Represses Shoot Branching in Arabidopsis

Shoot branching in plants is regulated by many environmental cues and by specific hormones such as strigolactone (SL). We show that the GAT1_2.1 gene (At1g15040) is repressed over 50-fold by nitrogen stress, and is also involved in branching control. At1g15040 is predicted to encode a class I glutamine amidotransferase (GAT1), a superfamily for which Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) has 30 potential members. Most members can be categorized into known biosynthetic pathways, for the amidation of known acceptor molecules (e.g. CTP synthesis). Some members, like GAT1_2.1, are of unknown function, likely involved in amidation of unknown acceptors. A gat1_2.1 mutant exhibits a significant increase in shoot branching, similar to mutants in SL biosynthesis. The results suggest that GAT1_2.1 is not involved in SL biosynthesis since exogenously applied GR24 (a synthetic SL) does not correct the mutant phenotype. The subfamily of GATs (GATase1_2), with At1g15040 as the founding member, appears to be present in all plants (including mosses), but not other organisms. This suggests a plant-specific function such as branching control. We discuss the possibility that the GAT1_2.1 enzyme may activate SLs (e.g. GR24) by amidation, or more likely could embody a new pathway for repression of branching.Shoot branching plays an important role in establishing plant body plans during development and growth, also conferring the flexibility for plants to respond to environmental stresses. The control of bud growth/branching has been studied for many decades with much interest stemming from its value in agriculture. Indeed, many of our domesticated crops have been bred for modified branching to optimize yields. In early studies, auxin synthesized in the shoot apex was proposed to act indirectly to inhibit bud outgrowth, while cytokinin (CK) synthesized in the roots promoted bud outgrowth (Domagalska and Leyser, 2011). Studies on auxin inhibition suggested there should be another signal mediating bud growth control (Hayward et al., 2009; Stirnberg et al., 2010; Domagalska and Leyser, 2011). In the past decade, studies in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and other plants have addressed this signal. Identification and characterization of mutants with increased branching in garden pea (Pisum sativum), Arabidopsis, rice (Oryza sativa), and Petunia hybrida demonstrated the existence of a long-distance signaling pathway that regulates shoot branching (Beveridge et al., 1996, 1997; Napoli, 1996; Stirnberg et al., 2002, 2007; Sorefan et al., 2003; Booker et al., 2004; Arite et al., 2007; Gomez-Roldan et al., 2008; Umehara et al., 2008, 2010; Lin et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2009, 2011; Zhang et al., 2010). Later, studies on pea (Gomez-Roldan et al., 2008) and rice (Umehara et al., 2008) demonstrated unequivocally that this hormone (or its precursor) is strigolactone (SL). Currently, it is proposed that SL acts downstream of auxin to regulate bud outgrowth (Brewer et al., 2009). It is also likely that SL and auxin have the capacity to modulate each other’s levels and distribution in a dynamic feedback loop required for the branching control (Ferguson and Beveridge, 2009; Hayward et al., 2009; Stirnberg et al., 2010). The interaction between SL and CK during bud outgrowth is less understood, although recent studies in pea indicate that SL and CK act antagonistically on bud growth (Dun et al., 2012).Branching is also modulated in response to environmental conditions, including nutrient supply. Generally, nutrient deficiency in soil causes a reduction in shoot to root ratio, resulting in decreased shoot branching (Lafever, 1981). Under nitrogen or phosphate limitation, elevated levels of SL repress shoot branching in rice, tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), and Arabidopsis (Yoneyama et al., 2007; López-Ráez et al., 2008; Umehara et al., 2008, 2010; Kohlen et al., 2011), and possibly increase lateral root formation (Ruyter-Spira et al., 2011). This makes sense physiologically, diverting resources to roots from shoots to scavenge more nutrients. The basis for modulation of SL levels or nutrient-dependent branching control is not understood.Here, we report a novel gene, GAT1_2.1 (At1g15040), predicted to encode a class I Gln amidotransferase (GAT1) in Arabidopsis, is highly repressed by long-term nitrogen stress (down 57-fold), and that mutation of this gene leads to an enhanced branching phenotype. Thus, this gene may present a link between the nitrogen stress response and branching control.