Roles of amyloplasts and water deficit in root tropisms

Directed growth of roots in relation to a moisture gradient is called hydrotropism. The no hydrotropic response (nhr1) mutant of Arabidopsis lacks a hydrotropic response, and shows a stronger gravitropic response than that of wild type (wt) in a medium with an osmotic gradient. Local application of abscisic acid (ABA) to seeds or root tips of nhr1 increased root downward growth, indicating the critical role of ABA in tropisms. Wt roots germinated and treated with ABA in this system were strongly gravitropic, even though they had almost no starch amyloplasts in the root-cap columella cells. Hydrotropically stimulated nhr1 roots, with or without ABA, maintained starch in the amyloplasts, as opposed to those of wt. Hence, the near-absence (wt) or abundant presence (nhr1) of starch granules does not influence the extent of downward gravitropism of the roots in an osmotic gradient medium. Starch degradation in the wt might help the root sustain osmotic stress and carry out hydrotropism, instead of reducing gravity responsiveness. nhr1 roots might be hydrotropically inactive because they maintain this starch reserve in the columella cells, sustaining both their turgor and growth, and in effect minimizing the need for hydrotropism and at least partially disabling its mechanism. We conclude that ABA and water stress are critical regulators of root tropic responses.     

A no hydrotropic response root mutant that responds positively to gravitropism in Arabidopsis

For most plants survival depends upon the capacity of root tips to sense and move towards water and other nutrients in the soil. Because land plants cannot escape environmental stress they use developmental solutions to remodel themselves in order to better adapt to the new conditions. The primary site for perception of underground signals is the root cap (RC). Plant roots have positive hydrotropic response and modify their growth direction in search of water. Using a screening system with a water potential gradient, we isolated a no hydrotropic response (nhr) semi-dominant mutant of Arabidopsis that continued to grow downwardly into the medium with the lowest water potential contrary to the positive hydrotropic and negative gravitropic response seen in wild type-roots. The lack of hydrotropic response of nhr1 roots was confirmed in a system with a gradient in air moisture. The root gravitropic response of nhr1 seedlings was significantly faster in comparison with those of wild type. The frequency of the waving pattern in nhr1 roots was increased compared to those of wild type. nhr1 seedlings had abnormal root cap morphogenesis and reduced root growth sensitivity to abscisic acid (ABA) and the polar auxin transport inhibitor N-(1-naphtyl)phtalamic acid (NPA). These results showed that hydrotropism is amenable to genetic analysis and that an ABA signaling pathway participates in sensing water potential gradients through the root cap.     

玉米初生根向水性诱导优化试验研究

为了研究湿度梯度对根系向水性反应的影响,采用Takahashi and Scott于1993年创建的方法,设置以下3个试验:1)向水性诱导物不同倾斜角试验;2)根系距向水性诱导物不同距离试验;3)根尖距底部饱和K2CO3溶液不同距离试验。同时,还研究了根长和根系延伸速率对根系向水性弯曲的影响。结果表明,用饱和K2CO3溶液控制湿度时根系的向水性弯曲度明显大于纯水。随着诱导物倾斜角的增大,向水性弯曲增强。与距诱导物3 mm和6 mm相比,根系直接接触诱导物时表现出最大的向水性反应。与根尖距底部盐溶液6 cm相比,相距4 cm时向水性弯曲度增大,这些与根尖周围的湿度梯度增大有关。当根长为1.0、1.5、2.0、2.5、3.0 cm时,短根比长根表现出更大的向水性反应,这可能与其较慢的延伸速率为根系对湿度梯度的反应提供了更充足的时间有关。为了验证这个假说,用相同长度的根系、通过控制不同温度进行试验,结果表明根系的向水性弯曲随温度升高而降低。可见,玉米初生根的向水性反应受环境和根系发育阶段两方面影响。当根系相距诱导物较近、根系周围的湿度梯度较大时,根系向水性反应更强。而且,具有较小延伸速率根系的向水性反应更大。考虑到干旱条件下根系伸长慢、且土壤中湿度梯度大,因而可以认为干旱条件下根系的向水性生长在玉米吸收水分中有重要作用。同时,对根系向水性诱导方法的优化有助于其生理机制的进一步研究。     

A test for hydrotropic behavior by roots of two coastal dune shrubs

Root hydrotropism could be a means by which plants forage for limited and patchy distributions of soil water. While root hydrotropism has been induced in distinctly artificial conditions, it is unclear if it operates in natural settings. Here, we tested for this possibility in seedlings of two species of dune shrubs. Growth of individual roots in sand-filled observation chambers was monitored in response to moisture-rich patches and resultant soil water gradients. Chambers were designed so that roots could intercept the moisture gradients but not the moisture-rich patches simply through gravitropism. While up to 12% of the Eriogonum parvifolium roots grew into the moisture-rich patches, comparable root growth was observed in the control. None of the Artemisia californica roots grew into the patches. Thus, in a reasonable simulation of field conditions, we found no compelling evidence for hydrotropic root behavior in seedlings of these two dune shrubs. Our results leave the ecological significance of root hydrotropism in question.     

Novel hydrotropism mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana and their altered waving response and phototropism.

Roots display positive hydrotropism in response to a moisture gradient, which is important for plants to escape from water stress and regulate the directional growth by interacting with other growth movements such as gravitropism, phototropism and waving response. On Earth, hydrotropism is interfered by gravitropism in particular, so that microgravity conditions or agravitropic mutants have been used for the study of hydrotropism. However, we have recently established an experimental system for the study of hydrotropism in Arabidopsis roots that easily develop hydrotropism in response to moisture gradient by overcoming gravitropism. Using the Arabidopsis system, we isolated hydrotropism mutants named root hydrotropism (rhy). In the present study, we examined the hydrotropism, gravitropism, phototropism, waving response and elongation growth of rhy4 and rhy5 roots that were defective in positive hydrotropism. Interestingly, rhy4 roots curved away from the water source and showed a reduced waving response. Both rhy4 and rhy5 showed normal gravitropism and a slight reduction in phototropism. These results suggest that there is a mutual molecular mechanism underlying hydrotropism, waving response and/or phototropism. Thus, we have obtained novel hydrotropic mutants that will be used for revealing molecular mechanism of root hydrotropism and its interaction with waving response and/or phototropism.     

Molecular mechanisms mediating root hydrotropism: what we have observed since the rediscovery of hydrotropism

Roots display directional growth toward moisture in response to a water potential gradient. Root hydrotropism is thought to facilitate plant adaptation to continuously changing water availability. Hydrotropism has not been as extensively studied as gravitropism. However, comparisons of hydrotropic and gravitropic responses identified mechanisms that are unique to hydrotropism. Regulatory mechanisms underlying the hydrotropic response appear to differ among different species. We recently performed molecular and genetic analyses of root hydrotropism in Arabidopsis thaliana. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of specific mechanisms mediating root hydrotropism in several plant species.

     

Root hydrotropism of an agravitropic pea mutant, ageotropum

We have partially characterized root hydrotropism of an agravitropic pea mutant, ageotropum (from Pisum sativum L. cv. Weibull's Weitor), without interference of gravitropism. Lowering the atmospheric air humidity inhibited root elongation and caused root curvature toward the moisture-saturated substrate in ageotropum pea. Removal of root tips approximately 1.5 mm in length blocked the hydrotropic response. A computer-assisted image analysis showed that the hydrotropic curvature in the roots of ageotropum pea was chiefly due to a greater inhibition of elongation on the humid side than the dry side of the roots. Similarly, gravitropic curvature of Alaska pea roots resulted from inhibition of elongation on the lower side of the horizontally placed roots, while the upper side of the roots maintained a normal growth rate. Gravitropic bending of Alaska pea roots was apparent 30 min after stimulation, whereas differential growth as well as curvature in positive root hydrotropism of ageotropum pea became visible 4–5 h after the continuous hydrostimulation. Application of 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid or ethyleneglycol-bis-( β -aminoethylether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid was inhibitory to both root hydrotropism of ageotropum pea and root gravitropism of Alaska pea. Some mutual response mechanism for both hydrotropism and gravitropism may exist in roots, although the stimulusperception mechanisms differ from one another.     

Physiological and genetic characterization of hydrotropic mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Roots display positive hydrotropism in response to moisture gradient. Hydrotropism regulates the directional growth by interaction with other growth movements. Using the seedlings of pea, cucumber, maize and wheat, we have revealed that the root cap perceives the moisture gradient and that auxin and calcium are involved in hydrotropism. However, molecular mechanisms for stimulus perception or signal transduction in hydrotropism are still remained unrevealed. To dissect the molecular mechanism underlying hydrotropism in seedling roots, we established a method for screening Arabidopsis mutants defective in root hydrotropism. Among about 20,000 M2 seedlings of Arabidopsis plants treated with EMS, we successfully obtained 12 mutants of which root hydrotropism was reduced to various extents. We named them root hydrotropism (rhy) and examined their gravitropism, phototropism, waving response and elongation growth as well as hydrotropism in roots. Roots of rhy1 mutant showed ahydrotropic response although the other responses and elongation growth of rhy1 mutant were normal. Roots of rhy2 and rhy3 mutants showed a reduced hydrotropism and abnormal responses in gravitropism, phototropism or waving pattern. Genetic analysis of the progeny produced by the backcross of rhy1 mutant to wild type suggested that rhy1 was a recessive mutation. We also examined the map position of the rhy1 locus.     

Hydrotropism in abscisic acid,wavy, and gravitropic mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana

We have developed experimental systems to study hydrotropism in seedling roots of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Arabidopsis roots showed a strong curvature in response to a moisture gradient, established by applying 1% agar and a saturated solution of KCl or K(2)CO(3) in a closed chamber. In this system, the hydrotropic response overcame the gravitropic response. Hydrotropic curvature commenced within 30 min and reached 80-100 degrees within 24 h of hydrostimulation. When 1% agar and agar containing 1 MPa sorbitol were placed side-by-side in humid air, a water potential gradient formed at the border between the two media. Although the gradient changed with time, it still elicited a hydrotropic response in Arabidopsis roots. The roots curved away from 0.5-1.5 MPa of sorbitol agar. Various Arabidopsis mutants were tested for their hydrotropic response. Roots of aba1-1 and abi2-1 mutants were less sensitive to hydrotropic stimulation. Addition of abscisic acid restored the normal hydrotropic response in aba1-1 roots. In comparison, mutants that exhibit a reduced response to gravity and auxin, axr1-3 and axr2-1, showed a hydrotropic response greater than that of the wild type. Wavy mutants, wav2-1 and wav3-1, showed increased sensitivity to the induction of hydrotropism by the moisture gradient. These results suggest that auxin plays divergent roles in hydrotropism and gravitropism, and that abscisic acid plays a positive role in hydrotropism. Furthermore, hydrotropism and the wavy response may share part of a common molecular pathway controlling the directional growth of roots.     

A molecular mechanism unique to hydrotropism in roots

Plants are sessile in nature and must respond to various environmental cues to regulate their growth orientation. Root hydrotropism, a response to moisture gradients, has been considered to play an important role in drought avoidance. Nonetheless, the processes underlying hydrotropism in roots have remained obscure until recently because of the interfering effect of gravitropism. To shed light on root hydrotropism, we isolated and analyzed two Arabidopsis mutants, mizu-kussei (miz) 1 and 2, that have abnormal hydrotropic responses but normal responses to gravity. MIZ1 encodes a protein of unknown function with a conserved domain at its C-terminus. MIZ2 encodes a guanine-nucleotide exchange factor for ADP-ribosylation factor-type G proteins, which has been identified as GNOM. These findings suggest that roots possess molecular mechanisms essential for hydrotropism but independent of gravitropism. One of such mechanisms involves vesicle transport unique to hydrotropism in roots. Here we summarize recent progress on the molecular mechanism of root hydrotropism and the roles of MIZ1 and MIZ2.     

Hydrotropism interacts with gravitropism by degrading amyloplasts in seedling roots of Arabidopsis and radish

In response to a moisture gradient, roots exhibit hydrotropism to control the orientation of their growth. To exhibit hydrotropism, however, they must overcome the gravitropism that is dominant on Earth. We found that moisture gradient or water stress caused immediate degradation of the starch anchors, amyloplasts, in root columella cells of Arabidopsis and radish (Raphanus sativus). Namely, development of hydrotropic response was accompanied by a simultaneous reduction in starch content in columella cells. Rapid degradation of amyloplasts in columella cells also occurred in the water-stressed roots with sorbitol or mannitol. Both hydrotropically stimulated and water-stressed roots showed a reduced responsiveness to gravity. Roots of a starchless mutant, pgm1-1, showed an enhanced hydrotropism compared with that of the wild type. These results suggest that the reduced responsiveness to gravity is, at least in part, attributable to the degradation of amyloplasts in columella cells. Thus, the reduction in gravitropism allows the roots to exhibit hydrotropism.     

Hydrotropism: the current state of our knowledge

The response of roots to a moisture gradient has been reexamined, and positive hydrotropism has been demonstrated in recent years. Agravitropic roots of a pea mutant have contributed to the studies on hydrotropism. The kinetics of hydrotropic curvature, interactions between hydrotropism and gravitropism, moisture gradients required for the induction of hydrotropism, the sensing site for moisture gradients, characteristics of hydrotropic signal and differential growth, and calcium involvement in signal transduction have been subjects of these studies. This review summarizes the current state of our knowledge on hydrotropism in roots.     

Hydrotropism: The current state of our knowledge

The response of roots to a moisture gradient has been reexamined, and positive hydrotropism has been demonstrated in recent years. Agravitropic roots of a pea mutant have contributed to the studies on hydrotropism. The kinetics of hydrotropic curvature, interactions between hydrotropism and gravitropism, moisture gradients required for the induction of hydrotropism, the sensing site for moisture gradients, characteristics of hydrotropic signal and differential growth, and calcium involvement in signal transduction have been subjects of these studies. This review summarizes the current state of our knowledge on hydrotropism in roots.     

Hydrotropism and Its Interaction with Gravitropism in Maize Roots

We have partially characterized root hydrotropism and its interaction with gravitropism in maize (Zea mays L.). Roots of Golden Cross Bantam 70, which require light for orthogravitropism, showed positive hydrotropism; bending upward when placed horizontally below a hydrostimulant (moist cheesecloth) in 85% relative humidity (RH) and in total darkness. However, the light-exposed roots of Golden Cross Bantam 70 or roots of a normal maize cultivar, Burpee Snow Cross, showed positive gravitropism under the same conditions; bending downward when placed horizontally below the hydrostimulant in 85% RH. Light-exposed roots of Golden Cross Bantam 70 placed at 70° below the horizontal plane responded positively hydrotropically, but gravitropism overcame the hydrotropism when the roots were placed at 45° below the horizontal. Roots placed vertically with the tip down in 85% RH bent to the side toward the hydrostimulant in both cultivars, and light conditions did not affect the response. Such vertical roots did not respond when the humidity was maintained near saturation. These results suggest that hydrotropic and gravitropic responses interact with one another depending on the intensity of one or both factors. Removal of the approximately 1.5 millimeter root tip blocked both hydrotropic and gravitropic responses in the two cultivars. However, removal of visible root tip mucilage did not affect hydrotropism or gravitropism in either cultivar.     

MIZ1-regulated hydrotropism functions in the growth and survival of Arabidopsis thaliana under natural conditions

Background and Aims

Root hydrotropism is a response to water-potential gradients that makes roots bend towards areas of higher water potential. The gene MIZU-KUSSEI1 (MIZ1) that is essential for hydrotropism in Arabidopsis roots has previously been identified. However, the role of root hydrotropism in plant growth and survival under natural conditions has not yet been proven. This study assessed how hydrotropic response contributes to drought avoidance in nature.

Methods

An experimental system was established for the study of Arabidopsis hydrotropism in soil. Characteristics of hydrotropism were analysed by comparing the responses of the miz1 mutant, transgenic plants overexpressing MIZ1 (MIZ1OE) and wild-type plants.

Key Results

Wild-type plants developed root systems in regions with higher water potential, whereas the roots of miz1 mutant plants did not show a similar response. This pattern of root distribution induced by hydrotropism was more pronounced in MIZ1OE plants than in wild-type plants. In addition, shoot biomass and the number of plants that survived under drought conditions were much greater in MIZ1OE plants.

Conclusions

These results show that hydrotropism plays an important role in root system development in soil and contributes to drought avoidance, which results in a greater yield and plant survival under water-limited conditions. The results also show that MIZ1 overexpression can be used for improving plant productivity in arid areas.     

Water potential, turgor and cell wall properties in elongating tissues of the hydrotropically bending roots of pea (Pisum sativum L.)

The hydrotropic bending of roots of an ageotropic pea mutant, ageotropum, was studied in humid air in a chamber with a steady humidity gradient. We examined the effects of atmospheric humidity around the root on the water status of root tissues, as well as the wall growth and the hydraulic properties of the elongating tissues. Atmospheric humidity at the surface of the root was clearly lower on the side orientated towards the air with lower humidity than on the side orientated towards the air with higher humidity. However, there were no differences in water potential and osmotic potential between the tissues that faced air with higher and lower humidities in the elongating and mature regions. Plastic extensibility was higher in the tissues that faced the air with lower humidity than in the tissues that faced the air with higher humidity. No differences in turgor pressure and yield threshold were observed between the tissues that faced air with higher and lower humidities. Therefore, the extensibility of the cell wall appeared to be responsible for the different growth rates of tissues in root hydrotropism. A further probable cause of the hydrotropical bending of roots is changes in the hydraulic conductance in the elongating tissues. Since the hydrotropic bending of roots occurred only when a root tip was exposed to a humidity gradient, hydrotropism might occur after perception of a difference in humidity by the root tip, with accompanying changes in cell wall extensibility and hydraulic conductance.     

Involvement of Arabidopsis thaliana phospholipase Dζ2 in root hydrotropism through the suppression of root gravitropism

Root hydrotropism is the phenomenon of directional root growth toward moisture under water-deficient conditions. Although physiological and genetic studies have revealed the involvement of the root cap in the sensing of moisture gradients, and those of auxin and abscisic acid (ABA) in the signal transduction for asymmetric root elongation, the overall mechanism of root hydrotropism is still unclear. We found that the promoter activity of the Arabidopsis phospholipase Dζ2 gene (PLDζ2) was localized to epidermal cells in the distal root elongation zone and lateral root cap cells adjacent to them, and that exogenous ABA enhanced the activity and extended its area to the entire root cap. Although pldζ2 mutant root caps did not exhibit a morphological phenotype in either the absence or presence of exogenous ABA, the inhibitory effect of ABA on gravitropism, which was significant in wild-type roots, was not observed in pldζ2 mutant roots. In root hydrotropism experiments, pldζ2 mutations significantly retarded or disturbed root hydrotropic responses. A drought condition similar to that used in a hydrotropism experiment enhanced the PLDζ2 promoter activity in the root cap, as did exogenous ABA. These results suggest that PLDζ2 responds to drought through ABA signaling in the root cap and accelerates root hydrotropism through the suppression of root gravitropism.     

How amyloplasts,water deficit and root tropisms interact?

Hydrotropism, the differential growth of plant roots directed by a moisture gradient, is a long recognized, but not well-understood plant behavior. Hydrotropism has been characterized in the model plant Arabidopsis. Previously, it was postulated that roots subjected to water stress are capable of undergo water-directed tropic growth independent of the gravity vector because of the loss of the starch granules in root cap columella cells and hence the loss of the early steps in gravitropic signaling. We have recently proposed that starch degradation in these cells during hydrostimulation sustain osmotic stress and root growth for carrying out hydrotropism instead of reducing gravity responsiveness. In addition, we also proposed that abscisic acid (ABA) and water deficit are critical regulators of root gravitropism and hydrotropism, and thus mediate the interacting mechanism between these two tropisms. Our conclusions are based upon experiments performed with the no hydrotropic response (nhr1) mutant of Arabidopsis, which lacks a hydrotropic response and shows a stronger gravitropic response than that of wild type (WT) in a medium with an osmotic gradient.Key words: starch, water deficit, auxin, abscisic acid, gravitropism, hydrotropismRoots of land plants sense and respond to different stimuli, some of which are fixed in direction and intensity (i.e., gravity) while other vary in time, space, direction and intensity (i.e., obstacles and moisture gradients). Directed growth of roots in relation to a gradient in moisture is called hydrotropism and begins in the root cap with the sensing of the moisture gradient. However, since gravity is an omnipresent accompaniment of Earthly life and many living process have evolved with it as a background constant, it is not surprising that root hydrotropism interacts with gravitropism.¹ The hydrotropic response in Arabidopsis, compare with other plants such as pea and cucumber^2,3 is readily observed even in the presence of gravity.^4,5 When Arabidopsis roots are subjected to a water gradient, such that the source of water is placed 180° opposed to the gravity vector, the roots will grow upwards, displaying positive hydrotropism. Therefore, it has been feasible to isolate so far two Arabidopsis mutants affected in their hydrotropic response.^5,6 Analysis of these mutants reveals new insights of the mechanism of hydrotropism. For one hand, the no hydrotropic response (nhr1) mutant lacks a hydrotropic response, and shows a stronger gravitropic response than that of wt and a modified wavy growth response in a medium with an osmotic gradient.^5,7 On the other hand, the mizu-kussei1 (miz1) mutant did not exhibit hydrotropism and showed regular gravitropism.⁶ Hence, the root hydrotropic response is both linked and unlinked from the gravitropic one. Nonetheless, miz1 roots also showed a reduced phototropism and a modified wavy growth response. This indicates that both MIZ1 and NHR1 are not exclusive components of the mechanism for hydrotropism and supports the notion that the root cap has assessment mechanisms that integrate many different environmental influences to produce a final integrated response.⁸ Thus, the physiological phenomena distinctively displayed by roots in order to forage resources from the environment are the result of integrated responses that resulted from many environmental influences sensed in the root cap.In the course of studying how gravity and water availability affected the perception and assessment of each other in root cap cells that generated the final root tropic response, we found that ABA is a critical regulator of the signal transduction mechanism that integrated these two-root tropisms.⁷ For this, we analyzed the long-term hydrotropic response of Arabidopsis roots in an osmotic gradient system. ABA, locally applied to seeds or root tips of nhr1, significantly increased root downward growth in a medium with an osmotic gradient (root length of nhr1 seedlings grown in this medium were on average 12.5 mm and plus 10 µM ABA were 25.1 mm). On the other hand, WT roots germinated and treated locally with ABA in this system were strongly gravitropic, albeit they had almost no starch in amyloplasts of root cap columella cells. Hydrotropically stimulated nhr1 roots, with or without ABA, maintained starch in amyloplastas, as opposed to those of WT. Therefore, the near-absence (WT) or abundant presence (nhr1) of starch granules does not affect the extent of downward gravitropism of roots in an osmotic gradient medium. Starch degradation in the wt might participate in osmoregulation by which root cells maintain turgor and consequently carry out hydrotropism, instead of reducing gravity responsiveness. In fact, it was just recently published that salt-induced rapid degradation of starch in amyloplasts is not likely the main reason for a negative gravitropic response seen under salt stress, because sos mutant roots of Arabidopsis showed negative gravitropic growth without any apparent rapid digestion of starch granules.⁹ Additionally, the stems of overwintering tubers of Potamogeton pectinatus are capable of elongating much faster in the absence than in the presence of oxygen for up to 14 days and its stems has an enhanced capacity for gravitropic movements in completely anoxic conditions.¹⁰ These authors hypothesized that ABA and starch degradation in the starchy tuber sustained stem cell elongation and cell division as well as differential growth required for the gravitropic response in these aquatic plants. These data taken together suggest that in conditions of anoxia, or water stress, ABA and degradation of starch play a critical role in the ability to survive relatively prolonged periods of unfavorable growth conditions. These players are critical when water or minerals are scarce since they regulate the enhancement of root downward growth. However, since roots can trail humidity gradients in soil, they can modulate their branching patterns (architecture) and thus respond to hydrotropism once a water-rich patch is found. Then the response of plants to gravity is principally one of nutrition (shoots to light, roots to mineral and water) and consequently must be regulated according to the long- and short-term environmental variables that occur during the development of the plant.Differential growth that occurs during the gravitropic and phototropic response has been explained according to the Cholodny-Went hypothesis, which states that the lateral transport of auxin across stimulated plant tissues is responsible for the curvature response.¹¹ Analysis of hydrotropism in some Arabidopsis agravitropic auxin transport mutants has demonstrated that these mutations do not influence their hydrotropic response.⁴ Furthermore, current pharmacological studies using inhibitors also indicated that both auxin influx and efflux are not required for hydrotropic response whereas auxin response is necessary for it.¹² These authors suggested a novel mechanism for auxin in root hydrotropism. Here, we analyzed whether asymmetric auxin distribution takes place across hydrotropically-stimulated roots using transgenic plants carrying a responsive auxin promoter (DR5) driving the expression of β-glucuronidase (GUS) or green fluorescent protein (GFP)^13,14 in wt and nhr1 backgrounds. Wt and nhr1 roots hydrotropically stimulated in a system with air moisture gradient⁵ showed no asymmetric expression of the DR5:: GUS or DR5::GFP (Fig. 1A and B). Nonetheless, nhr1 roots showed a substantial decrease in the signal driven by the DR5::GUS and GFP reporters in humidity saturated conditions (Fig. 1A, part b and B, part b), which might indicate that auxin-induced gene expression in the root cap was inhibited. It remains to be determined the significance of this inhibition in the no hydrotropic response phenotype displayed by nhr1 roots. Determination of the DR5::GUS expression in wt and nhr1 roots growing in an osmotic gradient medium for testing long-term hydrotropism revealed that the GUS signal was to some extent diminished in both wt or in nhr1 roots (Fig. 2C and D) compared to those roots growing in normal medium (Fig. 2A and B). An inhibitor of auxin response reduced hydrotropism,¹² and also inhibited auxin-dependent DR5::GUS expression.¹⁵ However, a decrease of DR5::GUS in wt root tips was not an impediment for developing an hydrotropic response. On the other hand, nhr1 roots also showed a decrease of DR5::GUS expression (Fig. 2B and D) and a complete absence of DR5::GFP (data not shown), which did not influence the extent of downward root gravitropism in water deficit conditions. Therefore, it is difficult to assign a role of auxin-induce gene expression in hydrotropism and further studies are required in order to unravel this issue. Furthermore, it needs to be resolved whether these expression studies oppose the idea that gradients in auxin precede differential growth in response to humidity gradients.Open in a separate windowFigure 1DR5:: GUS (A) and DR5::GFP (B) activity in the wild type NHR1 and nhr1 backgrounds. (A) Root tips hydrostimulated in a system with air moisture gradient (C and D) or grown in a saturated water conditions (A and B) stained with 1 mM 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-glucuronic (X-Gluc) acid buffer under the same conditions for 80 min. (B) Root tips hydrostimulated as in (A) (C and D) or grown in a saturated water conditions (A and B) whose green fluorescent signal was visualized by confocal microscopy. Shown are images selected from at least 45 representative root tips. Bar = 29 µm.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Expression of DR5::GUS in wild type NHR1 and nhr1 backgrounds. Roots were hydrotropically stimulated for 8 days in a medium with an osmotic gradient (C and D) or grown in normal medium (A and B) and stained with X-Gluc acid buffer under the same conditions for 80 min. Shown are images selected from at least 50 representative root tips. Bar = 25 µm.Our studies⁷ revealed that ABA is a critical regulator of both root gravitropism and hydrotropism in water deficit conditions, and that the role of auxin under these conditions seems to differ from those observed in several studies thus far published on gravitropism made under well-water conditions. The molecular characterization of NHR1 and from other nhr-like mutants already isolated in our lab will clarify the mechanisms involved in this fascinating tropism.¹⁶     

Characterization of hydrotropism: the timing of perception and signal movement from the root cap in the agravitropic pea mutant ageotropum

In this study, ageotropum pea mutant was used to determine the threshold time for perception of an osmotic stimulation in the root cap and the time requirement for transduction and transmission of the hydrotropic signal from the root cap to the elongation region. The threshold time for the perception of an osmotic stimulation was compared to current estimates of threshold times for graviperception in roots. The time required for transduction and transmission in the hydrotropic response of ageotropum was compared to the time requirement in the gravity response of Alaska pea roots. We determined that threshold time for perception of an osmotic stimulation in the root cap is very rapid, occurring in less than 2 min following the application of sorbitol to the root cap. Furthermore, a single 5 min exposure of sorbitol to the root cap fully induced a hydrotropic response. We also found that transduction and transmission of an osmotic stimulus requires 90-120 min for movement from the root cap to more basal tissues involved in differential growth leading to root curvature. The very rapid threshold time for perception of root hydrotropism is similar to those times reported for root gravitropism. However, the time required for the transduction and transmission of an osmotic stimulation from the root cap is significantly longer than the time required in gravitropism. These results suggest that there must exist some differences between root hydrotropism and gravitropism in either the rate or mechanisms of transduction and transmission of the tropistic signal from the root cap.