Function of initiation factor 1 in the binding and release of initiation factor 2 from ribosomal initiation complexes in Escherichia coli.

1. Studies on the function of initiation factor 1 (IF-1) in the formation of 30 S initiation complexes have been carried out. IF-1 appears to prevent the dissociation of initiation factor 2 (IF-2) from the 30 S initiation complex. The factor has no effect on either the initial binding of IF-2 nor does it increase the amount of IF-2 dependent fMet-tRNA and GTP bound to the 30 S subunit. Bound fMet-tRNA remains stable to sucrose gradient centrifugation even in the absence of IF-1. 2. It is postulated that the presence of IF-2 on the 30 S complex is necessary so that at the time of junction with the 50 S subunit to form a 70 S complex, the 70 S-dependent GTPase activity of IF-2 can hydrolyze GTP. This hydrolysis provides a means by which GTP can be removed to facilitate formation of a 70 S initiation complex active in peptidyl transfer. In support of this postulate, it was observed that 30 S initiation complexes formed in the absence of IF-1 could be depleted of their complexes were still able to accept 50 S subunits to form 70 S complexes which could still donate fMet-tRNA into peptide linkages. These results indicate that 30 S complexes lacking GTP do not require IF-2 for formation of active 70 S complexes. 3. IF-1, which is required to prevent dissociation of IF-2 from the 30 S initiation complex, is also required for release of IF-2 from ribosomes following 70 S initiation complex formation. The mechanisms of the release of IF-2 has been studied in greater detail. Evidence is presented which rules out the presence of a stable IF-2 GDP complex on the surface of the 70 S ribosome following GTP hydrolysis and of any exchange reactions between IF-1 and guanine nucleotides necessary for effecting the release of IF-2. IF-2 remains on the 70 S initiation complexes after release of guanine nucleotides and can be liberated solely by addition of IF-1.     

Initiation of mammalian protein synthesis. II. The assembly of the initiation complex with purified initiation factors

The assembly of initiation complexes is studied in a protein synthesis initiation assay containing ribosomal subunits, globin [¹²⁵I]mRNA, [³H]Met-tRNA_f, seven purified initiation factors, ATP and GTP. By omitting single components from the initiation assay, specific roles of the initiation factors, ATP and GTP are demonstrated. The initiation factor eIF-2 is required for the binding of Met-tRNA_f to the 40 S ribosomal subunit. The initial Met-tRNA_f binding to the small ribosomal subunit is a stringent prerequisite for the subsequent mRNA binding. The initiation factors eIF-3, eIF-4A, eIF-4B and eIF-4C together with ATP promote the binding of mRNA to the 40 S initiation complex. The association of the 40 S initiation complex with the 60 S ribosome subunit to form an 80 S initiation complex is mediated by the initiation factor eIF-5 and requires the hydrolysis of GTP. The factor eIF-1 gives a twofold overall stimulation of initiation complex formation. A model of the sequential steps in the assembly of the 80 S initiation complex in mammalian protein synthesis is presented.     

The cryo-EM structure of a translation initiation complex from Escherichia coli

The 70S ribosome and its complement of factors required for initiation of translation in E. coli were purified separately and reassembled in vitro with GDPNP, producing a stable initiation complex (IC) stalled after 70S assembly. We have obtained a cryo-EM reconstruction of the IC showing IF2*GDPNP at the intersubunit cleft of the 70S ribosome. IF2*GDPNP contacts the 30S and 50S subunits as well as fMet-tRNA(fMet). IF2 here adopts a conformation radically different from that seen in the recent crystal structure of IF2. The C-terminal domain of IF2 binds to the single-stranded portion of fMet-tRNA(fMet), thereby forcing the tRNA into a novel orientation at the P site. The GTP binding domain of IF2 binds to the GTPase-associated center of the 50S subunit in a manner similar to EF-G and EF-Tu. Additionally, we present evidence for the localization of IF1, IF3, one C-terminal domain of L7/L12, and the N-terminal domain of IF2 in the initiation complex.     

Escherichia coli ribosomes bind to non-initiator sites of Q beta RNA in the absence of formylmethionyl-tRNA.

Escherichia coli ribosomes and Qβ [³²P]RNA were incubated with or without fMet-tRNA under protein initiation conditions, treated with RNase A, and centrifuged through a sucrose density gradient. The sample incubated with fMet-tRNA gave a main radioactivity peak in the 70 S region, which consisted predominantly of coat cistron initiator fragments. After incubation without fMet-tRNA, equal amounts of radioactivity were found in the 70 S and the 30 S regions, but in both peaks almost all of the radioactivity was duo to three RNase A-resistant oligonucleotides, A-G-A-G-G-A-G-G-Up (P-2a), A-G-G-G-G-G-Up (P-15) and G-G-A-A-G-G-A-G-Cp (P-4). These three oligonucleotides are derived from three different RNA regions, none of which is close to a protein initiation site. All three fragments show striking complementarity to the 3′-terminal region of E. coli 16 S RNA. Ribosomes incubated with an RNase A digest of Qβ [³²P]RNA bound almost exclusively oligonucleotide P-2a; treatment with cloacin DF13 cleaved off a complex consisting of a 49-nucleotide long segment of 16 S rRNA and oligonucleotide P-2a. These experiments show that the interaction of 30 S ribosomes with the “Shine-Dalgarno” region preceding the initiator codon of the Qβ coat cistron is insufficient to direct correct placement of the ribosome on the viral RNA, and that an additional contribution from the interaction of fMet-tRNA with the initiator triplet is required for ribosome binding to the initiator region.     

A proposed role for IF-3 and EF-T in maintaining the specificity of prokaryotic initiation complex formation

Initiation factor-free 30S subunits of E. coli ribosomes bind aminoacyl-tRNAs more efficiently than fMet-tRNA _inff ^supMet . Elongator-tRNA binding was unaffected by IF-1 or IF-2 but was inhibited by IF-3. Their combination reduced this binding up to 40% and stimulated that of fMet-tRNA _inff ^supMet . Unexpectedly, EF-T also prevented elongator-tRNA binding by complexing both to the 30S and to the aminoacyl-tRNAs. Using AUGU₃ as mRNA, elongator-tRNAs competed with fMet-fRNA _inff ^supMet and with tRNA _inff ^supMet . fMet-tRNA _inff ^supMet reacted with puromycin after addition of 50S subunits suggesting that it occupied the P site. EF-T directed binding of phe-tRNA to the 30S.AUGU₃ complex at the A site only if fMet-tRNA _inff ^supMet or tRNA _inff ^supMet filled the P/E site. We propose that one function of EF-T may be to prevent the entry of aminoacyl-tRNAs into the 30S particle during initiation. The possibility that a special site for fMet-tRNA resides on 16S rRNA is also discussed.     

Initiation factor IF 2 binds to the alpha-sarcin loop and helix 89 of Escherichia coli 23S ribosomal RNA

During initiation of protein synthesis in bacteria, translation initiation factor IF2 is responsible for the recognition of the initiator tRNA (fMet-tRNA). To perform this function, IF2 binds to the ribosome interacting with both 30S and 50S ribosomal subunits. Here we report the topographical localization of translation initiation factor IF2 on the 70S ribosome determined by base-specific chemical probing. Our results indicate that IF2 specifically protects from chemical modification two sites in domain V of 23S rRNA, namely A2476 and A2478, and residues around position 2660 in domain VI, the so-called sarcin-ricin loop. These footprints are generated by IF2 regardless of the presence of fMet-tRNA, GTP, mRNA, and IF1. IF2 causes no specific protection of 16S rRNA. We observe a decreased reactivity of residues A1418 and A1483, which is an indication that the initiation factor has a tightening effect on the association of ribosomal subunits. This result, confirmed by sucrose density gradient analysis, seems to be a universally conserved property of IF2.     

Role of the N- and C-terminal extensions on the activity of mammalian mitochondrial translational initiation factor 3

Mammalian mitochondrial translational initiation factor 3 (IF3_mt) promotes initiation complex formation on mitochondrial 55S ribosomes in the presence of IF2_mt, fMet-tRNA and poly(A,U,G). The mature form of IF3_mt is predicted to be 247 residues. Alignment of IF3_mt with bacterial IF3 indicates that it has a central region with 20–30% identity to the bacterial factors. Both the N- and C-termini of IF3_mt have extensions of ~30 residues compared with bacterial IF3. To examine the role of the extensions on IF3_mt, deletion constructs were prepared in which the N-terminal extension, the C-terminal extension or both extensions were deleted. These truncated derivatives were slightly more active in promoting initiation complex formation than the mature form of IF3_mt. Mitochondrial 28S subunits have the ability to bind fMet-tRNA in the absence of mRNA. IF3_mt promotes the dissociation of the fMet-tRNA bound in the absence of mRNA. This activity of IF3_mt requires the C-terminal extension of this factor. Mitochondrial 28S subunits also bind mRNA independently of fMet-tRNA or added initiation factors. IF3_mt has no effect on the formation of these complexes and cannot dissociate them once formed. These observations have lead to a new model for the function of IF3_mt in mitochondrial translational initiation.     

The translational fidelity function of IF3 during transition from the 30 S initiation complex to the 70 S initiation complex

IF3 has a fidelity function in the initiation of translation, inducing the dissociation of fMet-tRNA(fMet) from the 30 S initiation complexes (30SIC) containing a non-canonical initiation triplet (e.g. AUU) in place of a canonical initiation triplet (e.g., AUG). IF2 has a complementary role, selectively promoting initiator tRNA binding to the ribosome. Here, we used parallel rapid kinetics measurements of GTP hydrolysis, Pi release, light-scattering, and changes in intensities of fluorophore-labeled IF2 and fMet-tRNA(fMet) to determine the effects on both 30SIC formation and 30SIC conversion to 70 S initiation complexes (70SIC) of (a) substituting AUG with AUU, and/or (b) omitting IF3, and/or (c) replacing GTP with the non-hydrolyzable analog GDPCP. We demonstrate that the presence or absence of IF3 has, at most, minor effects on the rate of 30SIC formation using either AUG or AUU as the initiation codon, and conclude that the high affinity of IF2 for both 30 S subunit and initiator tRNA overrides any perturbation of the codon-anticodon interaction resulting from AUU for AUG substitution. In contrast, replacement of AUG by AUU leads to a dramatic reduction in the rate of 70SIC formation from 30SIC upon addition of 50 S subunits. Interpreting our results in the framework of a quantitative kinetic scheme leads to the conclusion that, within the overall process of 70SIC formation, the step most affected by substituting AUU for AUG involves the conversion of an initially labile 70 S ribosome into a more stable complex. In the absence of IF3, the difference between AUG and AUU largely disappears, with each initiation codon affording rapid 70SIC formation, leading to the hypothesis that it is the rate of IF3 dissociation from the 70 S ribosome during IC70S formation that is critical to its fidelity function.     

Conformational transition of initiation factor 2 from the GTP- to GDP-bound state visualized on the ribosome

Initiation of protein synthesis is a universally conserved event that requires initiation factors IF1, IF2 and IF3 in prokaryotes. IF2 is a GTPase essential for binding initiator transfer RNA to the 30S ribosomal subunit and recruiting the 50S subunit into the 70S initiation complex. We present two cryo-EM structures of the assembled 70S initiation complex comprising mRNA, fMet-tRNA(fMet) and IF2 with either a non-hydrolyzable GTP analog or GDP. Transition from the GTP-bound to the GDP-bound state involves substantial conformational changes of IF2 and of the entire ribosome. In the GTP analog-bound state, IF2 interacts mostly with the 30S subunit and extends to the initiator tRNA in the peptidyl (P) site, whereas in the GDP-bound state IF2 steps back and adopts a 'ready-to-leave' conformation. Our data also provide insights into the molecular mechanism guiding release of IF1 and IF3.     

A quantitative kinetic scheme for 70 S translation initiation complex formation

Association of the 30 S initiation complex (30SIC) and the 50 S ribosomal subunit, leading to formation of the 70 S initiation complex (70SIC), is a critical step of the translation initiation pathway. The 70SIC contains initiator tRNA, fMet-tRNA(fMet), bound in the P (peptidyl)-site in response to the AUG start codon. We have formulated a quantitative kinetic scheme for the formation of an active 70SIC from 30SIC and 50 S subunits on the basis of parallel rapid kinetics measurements of GTP hydrolysis, Pi release, light-scattering, and changes in fluorescence intensities of fluorophore-labeled IF2 and fMet-tRNA(f)(Met). According to this scheme, an initially formed labile 70 S complex, which promotes rapid IF2-dependent GTP hydrolysis, either dissociates reversibly into 30 S and 50 S subunits or is converted to a more stable form, leading to 70SIC formation. The latter process takes place with intervening conformational changes of ribosome-bound IF2 and fMet-tRNA(fMet), which are monitored by spectral changes of fluorescent derivatives of IF2 and fMet-tRNA(fMet). The availability of such a scheme provides a useful framework for precisely elucidating the mechanisms by which substituting the non-hydrolyzable analog GDPCP for GTP or adding thiostrepton inhibit formation of a productive 70SIC. GDPCP does not affect stable 70 S formation, but perturbs fMet-tRNA(fMet) positioning in the P-site. In contrast, thiostrepton severely retards stable 70 S formation, but allows normal binding of fMet-tRNA(fMet)(prf20) to the P-site.     

Protein synthesis in Bacillus subtilis. I. Hydrodynamics and in vitro functional properties of ribosomes from B. subtilis W168.

On the basis of their sedimentation properties, the ribosomal particles in crude extracts of Bacillus subtilis W168 are characterized as pressure-sensitive couples, pressure-resistant couples, or non-associating subunits. Pressure-sensitive couples dissociate into subunits, yielding a peak at 60 S in the gradient profile, on sedimentation at high speed in the presence of 10 to 15 mm-Mg²⁺. Under the same conditions, pressure-resistant couples sediment at 70 S. Under certain conditions, pressure-resistant couples apparently aggregate, possibly in 70 S · 70 S dimers. Procedures are described for the isolation of pressure-sensitive couples from B. subtilis. The isolated couples are shown by chemical fixation experiments to require approximately twice the Mg²⁺ concentration required by Escherichia coli couples to remain associated at atmospheric pressure.All three types of B. subtilis ribosome incorporate amino acids into acid-insoluble material in the presence of B. subtilis cellular RNA, B. subtilis ribosomal salt wash fraction, and E. coli post-ribosomal supernatant. Overall incorporation, dependence on added RNA, and dependence on salt wash fraction are greatest with pressure-sensitive couples. The products of protein synthesis in vitro stimulated by total B. subtilis RNA appear to be a low molecular weight subset of the proteins synthesized most abundantly in vivo. Incubation of pressure-sensitive couples with cellular RNA from B. subtilis, fMet-tRNA_f^Met, ribosomal salt wash fraction and GTP results in their conversion to pressure-resistant couples, with concomitant and stoichiometric binding of fMet-tRNA to the 70 S species. It is concluded that in B. subtilis as in E. coli, pressure-sensitive couples are “vacant”, while pressure-resistant couples are “complexed” with messenger RNA. fMet-tRNA-bearing complexed couples are interpreted as initiation complexes in which ribosomes have bound mRNA, presumably at initiation sites. Their formation in vitro is strictly dependent on RNA, salt wash fraction and fMet-tRNA when vacant ribosomal couples are used.     

The Cryo-EM structure of a complete 30S translation initiation complex from Escherichia coli

Formation of the 30S initiation complex (30S IC) is an important checkpoint in regulation of gene expression. The selection of mRNA, correct start codon, and the initiator fMet-tRNA(fMet) requires the presence of three initiation factors (IF1, IF2, IF3) of which IF3 and IF1 control the fidelity of the process, while IF2 recruits fMet-tRNA(fMet). Here we present a cryo-EM reconstruction of the complete 30S IC, containing mRNA, fMet-tRNA(fMet), IF1, IF2, and IF3. In the 30S IC, IF2 contacts IF1, the 30S subunit shoulder, and the CCA end of fMet-tRNA(fMet), which occupies a novel P/I position (P/I1). The N-terminal domain of IF3 contacts the tRNA, whereas the C-terminal domain is bound to the platform of the 30S subunit. Binding of initiation factors and fMet-tRNA(fMet) induces a rotation of the head relative to the body of the 30S subunit, which is likely to prevail through 50S subunit joining until GTP hydrolysis and dissociation of IF2 take place. The structure provides insights into the mechanism of mRNA selection during translation initiation.     

RNA stem–loop enhanced expression of previously non-expressible genes

The key step in bacterial translation is formation of the pre-initiation complex. This requires initial contacts between mRNA, fMet-tRNA and the 30S subunit of the ribosome, steps that limit the initiation of translation. Here we report a method for improving translational initiation, which allows expression of several previously non-expressible genes. This method has potential applications in heterologous protein synthesis and high-throughput expression systems. We introduced a synthetic RNA stem–loop (stem length, 7 bp; ΔG₀ = –9.9 kcal/mol) in front of various gene sequences. In each case, the stem–loop was inserted 15 nt downstream from the start codon. Insertion of the stem–loop allowed in vitro expression of five previously non-expressible genes and enhanced the expression of all other genes investigated. Analysis of the RNA structure proved that the stem–loop was formed in vitro, and demonstrated that stabilization of the ribosome binding site is due to stem–loop introduction. By theoretical RNA structure analysis we showed that the inserted RNA stem–loop suppresses long-range interactions between the translation initiation domain and gene-specific mRNA sequences. Thus the inserted RNA stem–loop supports the formation of a separate translational initiation domain, which is more accessible to ribosome binding.     

The ribosome‐bound initiation factor 2 recruits initiator tRNA to the 30S initiation complex

Bacterial translation initiation factor 2 (IF2) is a GTPase that promotes the binding of the initiator fMet‐tRNA^fMet to the 30S ribosomal subunit. It is often assumed that IF2 delivers fMet‐tRNA^fMet to the ribosome in a ternary complex, IF2·GTP·fMet‐tRNA^fMet. By using rapid kinetic techniques, we show here that binding of IF2·GTP to the 30S ribosomal subunit precedes and is independent of fMet‐tRNA^fMet binding. The ternary complex formed in solution by IF2·GTP and fMet‐tRNA is unstable and dissociates before IF2·GTP and, subsequently, fMet‐tRNA^fMet bind to the 30S subunit. Ribosome‐bound IF2 might accelerate the recruitment of fMet‐tRNA^fMet to the 30S initiation complex by providing anchoring interactions or inducing a favourable ribosome conformation. The mechanism of action of IF2 seems to be different from that of tRNA carriers such as EF‐Tu, SelB and eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2), instead resembling that of eIF5B, the eukaryotic subunit association factor.     

The involvement of a complex between formylmethionyl-tRNA and initiation factor IF-2 in prokaryotic initiation.

A complex between initiation factor IF-2 and fMet-tRNA can be formed under ionic conditions, which are optimal for initiation complex formation. The complex can be retained on cellulose nitrate filters after fixing with glutaraldehyde. The IF-2 - FMet-tRNA complex formation is not influenced by GTP and GDP. Other nucleoside di of triphosphates also have no effect. Evidence is presented that this complex acts as an intermediate in polypeptide chain initiation. The IF-2 - fMet-tRNA complex formation is not influenced by initiation factors IF-1 and IF-3. The binary complex can be bound to the 30-S subunit in the absence of GTP, which indicates that there is no concomittant binding of the IF-2 - fMet-tRNA complex and the nucleotide moiety to the 30-S subunit. The binding of the binary complex is stimulated by GTP. The influence of some inhibitors of initiation on the IF-2 - fMet-tRNA complex formation has been tested. Aurin tricarboxylic acid appeared to be a strong inhibitor, whereas the sulfhydryl reagents N-ethylmaleimide and p-chloromercuribenzoate had no effect.     

Translation initiation factor IF2 interacts with the 30 S ribosomal subunit via two separate binding sites

The functional properties of the two natural forms of Escherichia coli translation initiation factor IF2 (IF2alpha and IF2beta) and of an N-terminal deletion mutant of the factor (IF2DeltaN) lacking the first 294 residues, corresponding to the entire N-terminal domain, were analysed comparatively. The results revealed that IF2alpha and IF2beta display almost indistinguishable properties, whereas IF2DeltaN, although fully active in all steps of the translation initiation pathway, displays functional activities having properties and requirements distinctly different from those of the intact molecule. Indeed, binding of IF2DeltaN to the 30 S subunit, IF2DeltaN-dependent stimulation of fMet-tRNA binding to the ribosome and of initiation dipeptide formation strongly depend upon the presence of IF1 and GTP, unlike with IF2alpha and IF2beta. The present results indicate that, using two separate active sites, IF2 establishes two interactions with the 30 S ribosomal subunit which have different properties and functions. The first site, located in the N domain of IF2, is responsible for a high-affinity interaction which "anchors" the factor to the subunit while the second site, mainly located in the beta-barrel module homologous to domain II of EF-G and EF-Tu, is responsible for the functional ("core") interaction of IF2 leading to the decoding of fMet-tRNA in the 30 S subunit P-site. The first interaction is functionally dispensable, sensitive to ionic-strength variations and essentially insensitive to the nature of the guanosine nucleotide ligand and to the presence of IF1, unlike the second interaction which strongly depends upon the presence of IF1 and GTP.     

Interchangeability of factors and tRNA's in bacterial and eukaryotic translation initiation systems

Summary Once formylated, eukaryotic initiator tRNA behaves in anE. coli translation system like the homologous initiator, in its binding to ribosomes and ability to form a peptide bond with puromycin. Conversely, anE. coli initiator tRNA, either formylated or not, can bind to reticulocyte ribosomes in the presence of poly AUG and reticulocyte factors, but no transfer to puromycin is obtained. Thus, eukaryotic ribosomes seem to impose a more stringent discrimination as far as the biological specificity of initiator tRNA is concerned than doE. coli ribosomes.The possibility to interchange initiation factors has also been examined. When added to reticulocyte 40S subunits,E. coli initiation factors catalyze poly AUG dependent binding ofE. coli initiator tRNA whether formylated or not. Thus, ability ofE. coli factors to discriminate between the N-formyl substituted and unformylated initiator is lost when the ribosomal context is modified. Also in support to the role of the ribosome in tRNA selection is the fact that eukaryotic tRNA's which are recognized by a completeE. coli ribosomal system fail to react whenE. coli factors are crossed with reticulocyte ribosomes.Reticulocyte IF prepared by 2 hrs KCl extraction from ribosomes (IF_2hrs) shows no catalytic activity onE. coli ribosomes whereas IF prepared by shorter KCl extraction (IF_1/2hr) stimulates low but appreciableE. coli or reticulocyte fMet-tRNA binding to 70S ribosomes. A similar activity is displayed by partially purified IF-M₁. Both IF_1/2hr and IF-M₁ dependent binding to heterologous ribosomes readily take place in the absence of GTP and no transfer to puromycin is observed. Complementation betweenE. coli IF₁ and reticulocyte IF-M₁ for fMet-tRNA binding to reticulocyte 40S subunits has been obtained suggesting functional similarities between IF-M₁ andE. coli IF₂. The possible role of IF-M₁ in the homologous reaction is discussed.     

Evidence for the translation initiation of leaderless mRNAs by the intact 70 S ribosome without its dissociation into subunits in eubacteria

In eubacteria, the dissociation of the 70 S ribosome into the 30 S and 50 S subunits is the essential first step for the translation initiation of canonical mRNAs that possess 5'-leader sequences. However, a number of leaderless mRNAs that start with the initiation codon have been identified in some eubacteria. These have been shown to be translated efficiently in vivo. Here we investigated the process by which leaderless mRNA translation is initiated by using a highly reconstituted cell-free translation system from Escherichia coli. We found that leaderless mRNAs bind preferentially to 70 S ribosomes and that the leaderless mRNA.70 S.fMet-tRNA complex can transit from the initiation to the elongation phase even in the absence of initiation factors (IFs). Moreover, leaderless mRNA translation proceeds more efficiently if the intact 70 S ribosome is involved compared with the 30 S subunit. Furthermore, excess amounts of IF3 inhibit leaderless mRNA translation, probably because it promotes the disassembly of the 70 S ribosome into subunits. Finally, excess amounts of fMet-tRNA facilitate the IF-independent translation of leaderless mRNA. These observations strongly suggest that leaderless mRNA translation is initiated by the assembled 70 S ribosome and thereby bypasses the dissociation process.     

Effect of Streptomycin on Ribosome Interconversion,a Possible Basis for the Action of the Antibiotic

STREPTOMYCIN affects bacterial protein synthesis in vitro by interfering with ribosomal functions^1,2. For example, it inhibits polypeptide synthesis directed by natural mRNA^3–5 or by synthetic polynucleotides^4,6–10, and, in the latter case, causes extensive misreading of the genetic code^10–15. The drug also induces breakdown of polysomes^5,14,15 and the release of fMet-tRNA from its complex with the 70S ribosome^16–18. It has been proposed that streptomycin causes these effects by distorting the ribosomal binding sites for tRNA derivatives^14–18. The nature of the primary effect of streptomycin on the ribosome is, however, still not fully understood. We present evidence that might provide an insight into the basic mechanism underlying the mode of action of the antibiotic.