Aromatase inhibitors--socio-economical issues

Novel, third-generation aromatase inhibitors are currently implemented for treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer in the metastatic and adjuvant setting and, potentially, for breast cancer prevention. Introduction of novel therapeutic strategies to large patient groups may add significant costs to health care budgets, forcing institutions to focus entirely on costs or the cost-utility of implementing such novel strategies. Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer in the female population in western societies, and its incidence is currently increasing in other parts of the world as well. Due to the proven efficacy and limited side effects of endocrine therapy in the adjuvant setting, the indications for use have been successively broadened. Currently, the majority of postmenopausal women treated for an estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer will be offered adjuvant endocrine therapy; thus, a general change of practice may cause significant implications to healthcare costs. This may relate to direct drug costs as well as indirect costs related to prevention of side effects, like additional use of bisphosphonates to prevent enhanced bone loss. The aim of this paper is to overview these considerations and put them into perspective by simple illustrations taken from current cost estimates.     

Endocrine approaches for the treatment of early and advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women

Preventing clinical progression is the major treatment goal for both early and advanced breast cancer. For hormone-responsive cases (about 70% of the total), this can necessitate the use of sequential hormone therapies at various points during the patient's life. Newer hormonal therapies, such as the third-generation aromatase inhibitor anastrozole, are now competing with tamoxifen as first choice endocrine therapy in breast cancer. In addition, a further non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor letrozole has been shown to be beneficial when given at completion of 5 years adjuvant tamoxifen. In light of these new data, current treatment paradigms need to be reviewed. Already well established as second-line treatments for advanced breast cancer, the improved risk:benefit profiles of anastrozole and letrozole compared with tamoxifen mean that these agents are now also recognised alternative treatments in the first-line relapse setting. More recent studies demonstrate that anastrozole may also have an improved risk:benefit profile compared with tamoxifen when used as initial adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer. Anastrozole is also being evaluated as a preventative treatment in women at high risk of developing breast cancer. A new addition to the endocrine treatment armamentarium is the oestrogen receptor antagonist fulvestrant, which, unlike tamoxifen, has no agonist effects. Fulvestrant is at least as effective as anastrozole in the second-line treatment of advanced breast cancer, and provides similar benefits to tamoxifen when used as first-line therapy in patients with advanced, hormone receptor-positive tumours.     

Adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal breast cancer in the era of aromatase inhibitors: an update

There is overwhelming evidence that optimal adjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone sensitive breast cancer in postmenopausal women should include a third generation aromatase inhibitor (AI). On current evidence, adjuvant anstrozole or letrozole should be used upfront in such patients especially in those with high risk disease (node positive and/or tumours > 2 cm). The sequential approach of tamoxifen for 2–3 years followed by exemestane or anastrozole for 2–3 years is a reasonable alternative to 5 years of AI monotherapy in patients with low risk disease (node negative and tumour smaller than 2 cm) especially if the tumour is positive for estrogen and progesterone receptors.Node-positive patients completing 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen should be offered letrozole for up 48 months. Further research is required to establish the long-term cardiovascular safety of AIs especially that of letrozole and exmestane, the optimal AI to use, duration of AI therapy and whether monotherapy with an AI for 5 years is superior to sequencing an AI after 2–3 years of tamoxifen.The bone mineral density (BMD) should be measured at baseline and monitored during therapy in women being treated with AIs. Anti-osteoporosis agents should such as bisphosphonates should be considered in patients at high risk of bone fractures.     

Pharmacogenomics of breast cancer targeted therapy: focus on recent patents

Adjuvant endocrine therapy as well as other forms of targeted therapy such as HER2 inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents reduce the risk of recurrence and improve survival among women with hormone receptor positive breast cancer. However, a significant percentage of women who receive targeted therapy as adjuvant or metastatic treatment do not benefit from this therapy, while a number of women who initially respond will eventually develop disease progression and relapse while on therapy. The observed variability in treatment response to targeted breast cancer treatment could be partly explained by pharmacogenomics. This paper reviews evidence on the role of pharmacogenomics of breast targeted therapy focusing on the clinical relevance of genetic variation. In particular, this article reviews the role of pharmacogenomics of tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, HER-2 inhibitors and anti-angiogenic agents. In addition, recent patents in the field are presented that provide promising steps in the field of personalized treatment of breast cancer, although future studies are needed for determining the clinical benefit of the proposed inventions. Finally, we present a testable hypothesis to aide the search for biologically meaningful genetic variation Specifically, we suggest the publication of negative results in the field of pharmacogenomics and pharmacoproteomics, will benefit future research in the field.     

Where do selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) now fit into breast cancer treatment algorithms?

The agents used for endocrine therapy in patients with breast cancer have changed markedly over the past decade. Tamoxifen remains the anti-oestrogen of choice, but could be replaced by the oestrogen receptor down-regulator ICI 182780 or by the fixed ring triphenylethylene arzoxifene (previously SERM III) soon. Whilst aminoglutethimide and 4-OH androstenedione were the aromatase inhibitors of choice, they have been replaced by non-steroidal (anastrozole and letrozole) and steroidal (exemestane) inhibitors of high potency and low side effect profile. Previously, often used treatments such as progestogens (megestrol acetate and medroxyprogesterone acetate) and androgens are now rarely used or confined to fourth or fifth line treatments. The LHRH agonist, goserelin, remains the treatment of choice for pre-menopausal patients with advanced breast cancer although recent randomised trials indicate a response, time to progression and survival advantage for the combination of goserelin and tamoxifen compared with goserelin alone.

The newer treatments have led to questions concerning the optimum sequence of agents to use in advanced breast cancer and as neo-adjuvant and adjuvant therapy in relation to surgery. Two trials of anastrozole compared with tamoxifen and one trial of letrozole compared with tamoxifen indicate that the new triazole aromatase inhibitors have a significant advantage over the anti-oestrogen with respect to time to progression and survival. Similarly, triazole aromatase inhibitors give faster and more complete responses compared with tamoxifen when used in post-menopausal women before surgery.

Major research questions remain with respect to the aromatase inhibitors used as adjuvant therapy. Anastrozole is being tested alone or in combination with tamoxifen compared with tamoxifen in the ‘so-called’ ATAC trial. Over 9000 patients have been randomised to this important study: the results will be available late-2001. A similar study comparing letrozole and tamoxifen started recently under the auspices of the Breast International Group. Importantly, this trial is also comparing the sequence of tamoxifen followed by letrozole (or vice versa). A similar trial of exemestane given after 2–3 years of tamoxifen compared with 5 years of tamoxifen is recruiting well as is a study comparing letrozole (or placebo) for 5 years after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen. These studies may show that aromatase inhibitors are superior to tamoxifen or that a sequence is preferable.

ICI 182780 causes complete oestrogen receptor down-regulation leading to a the lack of agonist activity of the drug. Two trials of ICI 182780 compared with anastrozole for advanced disease will report later this year and a comparison with tamoxifen next year. Arzoxifene (SERM III) is being tested against tamoxifen. These studies are likely to result in new anti-oestrogens being introduced into the clinic.

Most of our endocrine treatments deprived the tumour cell of oestradiol. In vitro experiments with MCF-7 cells indicate that tumour cells can adapt and then grow in response to low oestrogen concentrations in the tissue—culture medium. Importantly, the cells were shown to apoptose in response to high oestrogen concentrations. A recent clinical trial has demonstrated a high response rate to stilboestrol given after a median of four previous oestrogen depriving endocrine therapies. These data and the newer treatments available indicate a need to re-think our general approach to endocrine therapy and endocrine prevention.     

Predictors of response to aromatase inhibitors

Aromatase inhibitors are now considered to be part of the endocrine treatment for most hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in post-menopausal women for both early and advanced disease. Despite the impressive efficacy of these agents, up to 50% of treated patients exhibit de novo or intrinsic resistance to aromatase inhibitors and hence identification of response predictors is essential to allow treatment to be directed towards responsive populations and for alternative or additional therapies to be offered to resistant patients. Emerging data seem to suggest a role for the conventional tumour markers of oestrogen receptor and progesterone receptor as possible predictors of response but, particularly in the adjuvant setting, the extent to which these are useful has not been fully elucidated. Data from both the neo-adjuvant and advanced disease settings suggest that response to aromatase inhibitors does not appear to be adversely affected by HER-2 overexpression. Within neo-adjuvant aromatase inhibitor studies, the proliferation marker Ki67 has shown a significant correlation with relapse-free survival, suggesting a role in prediction for measurement of Ki67 and other dynamic markers of response. Analysis of multiple gene expression changes over a short treatment period may also have potential clinical utility for prediction of response.     

Aromatase inhibitors: future directions

Estrogen and its cognate estrogen receptor are key players in the etiology and progression of breast cancer. Aromatase inhibitors, suppressing tumor and plasma estrogen levels by blocking testosterone conversion to estrogen, have been proven to provide the most effective endocrine therapy for postmenopausal breast cancer patients. Aromatase inhibitors are now the first choice endocrine therapy in the metastatic setting for postmenopausal women. These endocrine agents also seem likely to soon become the standard adjuvant therapy, either alone or in sequence with tamoxifen, though their long-term toxicity and the optimum duration of therapy still remain to be defined. Advanced experimental studies and some clinical observations reveal the importance of blocking both the genomic and non-genomic activities of the estrogen receptor, as well as its crosstalk with growth factor and other cellular signaling, for greatest effectiveness of endocrine therapy. Consequently, these studies provide a mechanistic explanation for the superb performance of aromatase inhibitors, and also suggest how inhibiting selected growth factor receptors might delay or prevent the onset of resistance to aromatase inhibitors and other endocrine therapies.     

Aromatase and its inhibitors

Inhibitors of aromatase (estrogen synthetase) have been developed as treatment for postmenopausal breast cancer. Both steroidal substrate analogs, type I inhibitors, which inactivate the enzyme and non-steroidal competitive reversible, type II inhibitors, are now available. 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA), the first selective aromatase inhibitor, has been shown to reduce serum estrogen concentrations and cause complete and partial responses in approximately 25% of patients with hormone responsive disease who have relapsed from previous endocrine treatment. Letrozole (CGS 20, 269) and anastrozole (ZN 1033) have been recently approved for treatment. Both suppress serum estrogen levels to the limit of assay detection. Letrozole has been shown to be significantly superior to megace in overall response rates and time to treatment failure, whereas anastrozole was found to improve survival in comparison to megace. Both were better tolerated than the latter. The potential of aromatase within the breast as a significant source of estrogen mediating tumor proliferation and which might determine the outcome of inhibitor treatment was explored. Using immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization, aromatase and mRNA_arom was detected mainly in the epithelial cells of the terminal ductal lobular units (TDLU) of the normal breast and also in breast tumor epithelial cells as well as some stromal cells. Increase in proliferation, measured by increased thymidine incorporation into DNA and by PCNA immunostaining in response to testosterone was observed in histocultures of breast cancer samples. This effect could be inhibited by 4-OHA and implies that intratumoral aromatase has functional significance. An intratumoral aromatase model in the ovariectomized nude mouse was developed which simulated the hormone responsive postmenopausal breast cancer patient. This model also allows evaluation of the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors and antiestrogens in tumors of estrogen receptor positive, human breast carcinoma cells transfected with the human aromatase gene. Thus, the cells synthesized estrogen which stimulated tumor formation. Both aromatase inhibitors and antiestrogens were effective in suppressing tumor growth in this model. However, letrozole was more effective than tamoxifen. When the aromatase inhibitors were combined with tamoxifen, tumor growth was suppressed to about the same extent as with the aromatase inhibitors alone. Thus, there was no additive or synergistic effects of combining tamoxifen with aromatase inhibitors. This suggests that sequential treatment with these agents is likely to be more beneficial to the patient in terms of longer response to treatment.     

Summary of aromatase inhibitor trials: the past and future

Antagonizing estrogen by inhibition of aromatase has become a mainstay of adjuvant endocrine therapy in women with hormone receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer. Recent trials have shown an incremental gain for the AIs over tamoxifen when given as an up-front alternative to tamoxifen, but additionally added benefit is achieved by giving them in sequence with tamoxifen after either an early switch (2–3 years) or as a late switch (5 years). The true clinical implications of accelerated bone resorption from AIs is becoming better understood and its management defined. AI minimally effect quality of life. The chronic relapsing nature of ER+ breast cancer implies long term therapy will be of benefit in selected patients. Outstanding issues under investigation include optimal duration of endocrine therapy, optimal sequence, optimal agents and whether combining anti-estrogens will yield advantage. The role of AIs is also under investigation in premenopausal women in combination with ovarian function suppression. Identifying prognostic and predictive factors of endocrine therapy is important as is the identification and overcoming of resistance mechanisms. Both tumor and host signatures are being pursued to this end. Optimizing, expanding and extending endocrine therapy is likely to add further to patient outcome.     

Development and evolution of therapies targeted to the estrogen receptor for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer

This article describes the origins and evolution of "antiestrogenic" medicines for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer. Developing drugs that target the estrogen receptor (ER) either directly (tamoxifen) or indirectly (aromatase inhibitors) has improved the prognosis of breast cancer and significantly advanced healthcare. The development of the principles for treatment and the success of the concept, in practice, has become a model for molecular medicine and presaged the current testing of numerous targeted therapies for all forms of cancer. The translational research with tamoxifen to target the ER with the appropriate duration (5 years) of adjuvant therapy has contributed to the falling national death rates from breast cancer. Additionally, exploration of the endocrine pharmacology of tamoxifen and related nonsteroidal antiestrogen (e.g. keoxifene now known as raloxifene) resulted in the laboratory recognition of selective ER modulation and the translation of the concept to use raloxifene for the prevention of osteoporosis and breast cancer. However, the extensive evaluation of tamoxifen treatment revealed small but significant side effects such as endometrial cancer, blood clots and the development of acquired resistance. The solution was to develop drugs that targeted the aromatase enzyme specifically to prevent the conversion of androstenedione to estrone and subsequently estradiol. The successful translational research with the suicide inhibitor 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (known as formestane) pioneered the development of a range of oral aromatase inhibitors that are either suicide inhibitors (exemestane) or competitive inhibitors (letrozole and anastrozole) of the aromatase enzyme. Treatment with aromatase inhibitors is proving effective and is associated with reduction in the incidence of endometrial cancer and blood clots when compared with tamoxifen and there is also limited cross resistance so treatment can be sequential. Current clinical trials are addressing the value of aromatase inhibitors as chemopreventive agents for postmenopausal women.     

Aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapies in patients with breast cancer

There is increasing evidence that endocrine therapy has an important role in patients with oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Several large meta-analyses have reinforced the value of both ovarian ablation and tamoxifen in improving survival. Over the past decade, aromatase inhibitors have become the treatment of choice for second-line therapy of metastatic breast cancer, and the third generation inhibitors have now an established reputation for good patient tolerability. Early studies indicated that aminoglutethimide/hydrocortisone could benefit postmenopausal patients with primary breast cancer, and in 2001, the ATAC study showed that the third generation aromatase inhibitor, anastrozole, seemed superior to tamoxifen in that anastrozole-treated patients had a longer disease-free survival. Other studies will report on the relative merits of the steroidal inhibitor exemestane as well as non-steroidal letrozole. The exact duration and sequencing of treatment, together with the long-term effects on bone are at present, unknown.     

Impact of aromatase inhibitors on bone health in breast cancer patients

Following the implementation of the third generation aromatase inhibitors in the treatment algorithms for early breast cancer, special attention has been given to the influence of these drugs on bone health. Due to their potent estrogen suppression, the aromatase inhibitors anastrozole and letrozole, as well as the aromatase inactivator exemestane, enhance bone loss in postmenopausal women reflected in decreasing levels of bone mineral density. Moreover, all major phase III trials involving aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting have reported increased fracture rates. All in all, there is no hard evidence to suggest major differences between the individual compounds concerning their side-effects on bone. The consequences of AI therapy on bone are in addition modified by a variety of factors like the BMD level prior to therapy, time since menopause, and vitamin D status. Strategies to avoid bone loss during AI therapy have shown promising results. Thus, bisphosphonates have been shown to prohibit bone loss during AI therapy if used upfront. Novel treatment strategies, like antibodies against RANKL have been developed and promising preliminary results have been published from early trials. Standardized guidelines to avoid or minimize bone loss during AI therapy have been developed, in most countries involving calcium and vitamin D supplementation, as well as BMD measurements to identify patient subgroups demanding bisphosphonate therapy.     

The relationship between aromatase in primary breast tumors and response to treatment with aromatase inhibitors in advanced disease

Aromatase inhibitors are proving to be more effective than tamoxifen for postmenopausal patients with breast cancer. Estrogen concentrations in the breast are similar in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women, and several fold higher than circulating levels in postmenopausal women. In order to investigate the importance of intratumoral aromatase in stimulating the proliferation of the tumor, we used immunocytochemistry to determine the extent of aromatase expression in relationship to the response of the patient to aromatase inhibitor treatment. The relationship between positive staining for aromatase in the primary tumor and response to treatment with an aromatase inhibitor was investigated in a retrospective study of 102 patients with advanced breast cancer. Immunohistochemical staining using a monoclonal antibody against aromatase was performed on paraffin embedded tumor tissue. Response was evaluated using UICC criteria. Nine out of 13 patients with objective response to treatment stained positive and 49 of 89 patients with stable or progressive disease stained positive. No significant relationship between positive staining and objective response to treatment could be found. When patients with 'clinical benefit' (i.e. objective response plus prolonged stable disease of at least 6 months) were considered, also no relationship could be found. Further analysis of subgroups with positive hormone receptors, treatment with newer generation aromatase inhibitors, single metastatic site, non-visceral metastases and previous treatment only with tamoxifen did not show any relationship. Tumor aromatase expression did not correlate with response of patients with advanced breast cancer to aromatase inhibitor treatment. Most patients had relapsed from other treatments before receiving an aromatase inhibitor. It seems likely that many of these patients had tumors that may have progressed to hormone independence at this stage of the disease. Research in patients who have received treatment with aromatase inhibitors in earlier stages of disease (first line and adjuvant treatment) may provide further information on the relationship between tumor aromatase, steroid receptors and response to inhibitor treatment.     

Importance of PI3-kinase pathway in response/resistance to aromatase inhibitors

Endocrine therapy has been the most effective treatment modality for hormone receptor positive breast cancer. However, its efficacy has been limited by either de novo or acquired resistance. Recent data indicates that activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling is associated with the poor outcome luminal B subtype of breast cancer and accompanied by the development of endocrine therapy resistance. Importantly, inhibition of PI3K pathway signaling in endocrine resistant breast cancer cell lines reduces cell survival and improves treatment response to endocrine agents. Interestingly, mutations in PIK3CA, the alpha catalytic subunit of the class IA PI3K, which renders cells dependent on PI3K pathway signaling, is the most common genetic abnormality identified in hormone receptor positive breast cancer. The synthetic lethality observed between estrogen deprivation and PI3K pathway inhibition in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer cell lines provides further scientific rational to target both estrogen receptor and the PI3K pathway in order to improve the outcome of ER+ breast cancer.     

Benefit with aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting for postmenopausal women with breast cancer

The third-generation aromatase inhibitors, letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane, have been shown to be effective both as alternatives to tamoxifen in first-line treatment of hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women and following failure of first-line tamoxifen for endocrine therapy. These 3 agents are now being investigated as adjuvant therapy of early breast cancer, as alternative or complementary treatments to the standard, tamoxifen. Three treatment strategies are under investigation: replacement of tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy for 5 years (early adjuvant therapy), sequencing of tamoxifen before or after an aromatase inhibitor during the first 5 years (early sequential adjuvant therapy), or following 5 years of tamoxifen (extended adjuvant therapy). In the first adjuvant trial (Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination [ATAC]), anastrozole was significantly superior to tamoxifen in reducing risk of disease recurrence, and recently, the Breast International Group (BIG) trial BIG 1-98 demonstrated the significant superiority of letrozole over tamoxifen in improving disease-free survival. A large trial (International Collaborative Cancer Group [ICCG] trial 96) investigated sequencing of 2 to 3 years of exemestane after 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen and found that switching to exemestane was significantly superior in disease-free survival compared with continuing on tamoxifen. The Arimidex or Nolvadex (ARNO) and the small ITA (Italian Tamoxifen Arimidex) trials similarly sequenced anastrozole after tamoxifen and also found that sequencing reduced the hazard of recurrence compared with remaining on tamoxifen. Trial MA.17 evaluated extended adjuvant therapy with letrozole vs placebo following 5 years of tamoxifen. Disease-free survival was significantly improved with letrozole vs placebo, irrespective of whether patients had lymph node-positive or node-negative tumors. All 3 aromatase inhibitors were generally well tolerated. Results of these trials indicate that aromatase inhibitors provide important benefits relative to tamoxifen in each of these adjuvant treatment settings, but the optimal approach still needs to be defined. Other trials continue to investigate some of these adjuvant treatment strategies.     

Antiestrogen use in breast cancer patients reduces the risk of subsequent lung cancer: A population-based study

BackgroundThere is accumulating epidemiological and preclinical evidence that estrogen might be a driver of lung cancer. Breast cancer survivors can offer a unique patient cohort to examine the effect of antiestrogen therapy on lung cancer carcinogenesis because many of these women would have received long-term selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and/or aromatase inhibitors (AIs) as adjuvant treatment. Our hypothesis is that estrogens play a role in lung cancer development, and that antiestrogen therapy would affect the incidence of subsequent lung cancer among breast cancer survivors.MethodsUsing the Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) database, the study included 40,900 survivors of non-metastatic breast cancer after primary surgery, and most antiestrogen users complied well with the medication regimen. We evaluate the effect of antiestrogen therapy on the incidence of subsequent lung cancers.ResultsThis population-based study revealed that antiestrogen use in breast cancer patients was associated with a reduced risk of subsequent lung cancer in older patients (≥50 years) (HR 0.73, 95%CI 0.54–0.99) when compared with breast cancer survivors who did not use antiestrogens.ConclusionThe study supports the hypothesis that antiestrogen therapy modifies lung cancer carcinogenesis in older women. Further well-designed clinical trials to explore the potential of antiestrogens in lung cancer prevention and treatment would be worthwhile.     

Evaluation of synthesized coumarin derivatives on aromatase inhibitory activity

In women across the world, the most common type of cancer is breast cancer. Among medical treatments, endocrine therapy based on aromatase inhibitors (AI) is expected to be effective against not only post-menopausal but also pre-menopausal breast cancer. In this study, we examined the structure–activity relationship between the aromatase inhibitory effects of 7-diethylaminocoumarin derivatives with a substituent at position 3 and coumarin derivatives with a substituent at position 7. Consequently, we found that 7-(pyridin-3-yl)coumarin (IC₅₀ values 30.3 nM) and 7,7′-diethylamino-3,3′-biscoumarin (28.7 nM) are the most potent inhibitors of aromatase. These inhibitors were found to be comparable to the existing CYP19 inhibitor exemestane (42.5 nM).     

Sequential adjuvant hormone therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer: rationale and clinical results

For the past 15 years tamoxifen has been the standard adjuvant hormone therapy for women with early-stage breast cancer and estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors, irrespective of nodal status and other clinicopathological parameters. Recent studies provided evidence that the optimal duration of tamoxifen treatment is 5 years. Based on the positive clinical results obtained with the administration of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in the metastatic setting, several controlled clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy and side effects of AIs versus standard tamoxifen also as adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. The results of the above studies, suggest a therapeutic advantage of AIs over tamoxifen with regard to relapse-free survival and the risk of metachronous contralateral breast cancer. We review the rationale and the available clinical data on initial or sequential hormone treatment with AIs and we propose a novel scenario for possible therapeutic strategies based on the clinicopathological characteristics of the patients and on the biology of each single tumor.