Polo-like kinase 1 inhibits DNA damage response during mitosis

In response to genotoxic stress, cells protect their genome integrity by activation of a conserved DNA damage response (DDR) pathway that coordinates DNA repair and progression through the cell cycle. Extensive modification of the chromatin flanking the DNA lesion by ATM kinase and RNF8/RNF168 ubiquitin ligases enables recruitment of various repair factors. Among them BRCA1 and 53BP1 are required for homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining, respectively. Whereas mechanisms of DDR are relatively well understood in interphase cells, comparatively less is known about organization of DDR during mitosis. Although ATM can be activated in mitotic cells, 53BP1 is not recruited to the chromatin until cells exit mitosis. Here we report mitotic phosphorylation of 53BP1 by Plk1 and Cdk1 that impairs the ability of 53BP1 to bind the ubiquitinated H2A and to properly localize to the sites of DNA damage. Phosphorylation of 53BP1 at S1618 occurs at kinetochores and in cytosol and is restricted to mitotic cells. Interaction between 53BP1 and Plk1 depends on the activity of Cdk1. We propose that activity of Cdk1 and Plk1 allows spatiotemporally controlled suppression of 53BP1 function during mitosis.     

Give me a break,but not in mitosis

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are extremely cytotoxic with a single unrepaired DSB being sufficient to induce cell death. A complex signalling cascade, termed the DNA damage response (DDR), is in place to deal with such DNA lesions and maintain genome stability. Recent work by us and others has found that the signalling cascade activated by DSBs in mitosis is truncated, displaying apical, but not downstream, components of the DDR. The E3 Ubiquitin ligases RNF8, RNF168 and BRCA1, along with the DDR mediator 53BP1, are not recruited to DSB sites in mitosis, and activation of downstream checkpoint kinases is also impaired. Here, we show that RNF8 and RNF168 are recruited to DNA damage foci in late mitosis, presumably to prime sites for 53BP1 recruitment in early G1. Interestingly, we show that, although RNF8, RNF168 and 53BP1 are excluded from DSB sites during most of mitosis, they associate with mitotic structures such as the kinetochore, suggesting roles for these DDR factors during mitotic cell division. We discuss these and other recent findings and suggest how these novel data collectively contribute to our understanding of mitosis and how cells deal with DNA damage during this crucial cell cycle stage.     

Discordance between phosphorylation and recruitment of 53BP1 in response to DNA double-strand breaks

During the DNA damage response (DDR), chromatin modifications contribute to localization of 53BP1 to sites of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). 53BP1 is phosphorylated during the DDR, but it is unclear whether phosphorylation is directly coupled to chromatin binding. In this study, we used human diploid fibroblasts and HCT116 tumor cells to study 53BP1 phosphorylation at Serine-25 and Serine-1778 during endogenous and exogenous DSBs (DNA replication and whole-cell or sub-nuclear microbeam irradiation, respectively). In non-stressed conditions, endogenous DSBs in S-phase cells led to accumulation of 53BP1 and γH2AX into discrete nuclear foci. Only the frank collapse of DNA replication forks following hydroxyurea treatment initiated 53BP1^Ser25 and 53BP1^Ser1778 phosphorylation. In response to exogenous DSBs, 53BP1^Ser25 and 53BP1^Ser1778 phosphoforms localized to sites of initial DSBs in a cell cycle-independent manner. 53BP1 phosphoforms also localized to late residual foci and associated with PML-NBs during IR-induced senescence. Using isogenic cell lines and small-molecule inhibitors, we observed that DDR-induced 53BP1 phosphorylation was dependent on ATM and DNA-PKcs kinase activity but independent of MRE11 sensing or RNF168 chromatin remodeling. However, loss of RNF168 blocked recruitment of phosphorylated 53BP1 to sites of DNA damage. Our results uncouple 53BP1 phosphorylation from DSB localization and support parallel pathways for 53BP1 biology during the DDR. As relative 53BP1 expression may be a biomarker of DNA repair capacity in solid tumors, the tracking of 53BP1 phosphoforms in situ may give unique information regarding different cancer phenotypes or response to cancer treatment.     

Give me a break,but not in mitosis: The mitotic DNA damage response marks DNA double strand breaks with early signaling events

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are extremely cytotoxic lesions with a single unrepaired DSB being sufficient to induce cell death. A complex signaling cascade, termed the DNA damage response (DDR), is in place to deal with such DNA lesions and maintain genome stability. Recent work by us and others has found that the signaling cascade activated by DSBs in mitosis is truncated, displaying apical, but not downstream, components of the DDR. The E3 Ubiquitin ligases RNF8, RNF168 and BRCA1, along with the DDR mediator 53BP1, are not recruited to DSB sites in mitosis, and activation of downstream checkpoint kinases is also impaired. Here, we show that RNF8 and RNF168 are recruited to DNA damage foci in late mitosis, presumably to prime sites for 53BP1 recruitment in early G₁. Interestingly, we show that, although RNF8, RNF168 and 53BP1 are excluded from DSB sites during most of mitosis, they associate with mitotic structures such as the kinetochore, suggesting roles for these DDR factors during mitotic cell division. We discuss these and other recent findings and suggest how these novel data collectively contribute to our understanding of mitosis and how cells deal with DNA damage during this crucial cell cycle stage.Key words: mitosis, DNA damage response, DNA double-strand breaks, signaling cascade, chromatin     

A small ubiquitin binding domain inhibits ubiquitin-dependent protein recruitment to DNA repair foci

The rapid ubiquitination of chromatin surrounding DNA double-stranded breaks (DSB) drives the formation of large structures called ionizing radiation-induced foci (IRIF), comprising many DNA damage response (DDR) proteins. This process is regulated by RNF8 and RNF168 ubiquitin ligases and is thought to be necessary for DNA repair and activation of signaling pathways involved in regulating cell cycle checkpoints. Here we demonstrate that it is possible to interfere with ubiquitin-dependent recruitment of DDR factors by expressing proteins containing ubiquitin binding domains (UBDs) that bind to lysine 63-linked polyubiquitin chains. Expression of the E3 ubiquitin ligase RAD18 prevented chromatin spreading of 53BP1 at DSBs, and this phenomenon was dependent upon the integrity of the RAD18 UBD. An isolated RAD18 UBD interfered with 53BP1 chromatin spreading, as well as other important DDR mediators, including RAP80 and the BRCA1 tumor suppressor protein, consistent with the model that the RAD18 UBD is blocking access of proteins to ubiquitinated chromatin. Using the RAD18 UBD as a tool to impede localization of 53BP1 and BRCA1 to repair foci, we found that DDR signaling, DNA DSB repair, and radiosensitivity were unaffected. We did find that activated ATM (S1981P) and phosphorylated SMC1 (a specific target of ATM) were not detectable in DNA repair foci, in addition to upregulated homologous recombination repair, revealing 2 DDR responses that are dependent upon chromatin spreading of certain DDR factors at DSBs. These data demonstrate that select UBDs containing targeting motifs may be useful probes in determining the biological significance of protein–ubiquitin interactions.     

Mitotic DNA damage response: Polo-like Kinase-1 is dephosphorylated through ATM-Chk1 pathway

DNA damage during the cell division cycle can activate ATM/ATR and their downstream kinases that are involved in the checkpoint pathway, and cell growth is halted until damage is repaired. As a result of DNA damage induced in mitotic cells by doxorubicin treatment, cells accumulate in a G2-like phase, not in mitosis. Under these conditions, two mitosis-specific kinases, Cdk1 and Plk1, are inhibited by inhibitory phosphorylation and dephosphorylation, respectively. G2-specific phosphorylation of Cdc25 was increased during incubation after mitotic DNA damage. Inhibition of Plk1 through dephosphorylation was dependent on ATM/Chk1 activity. Depleted expression of ATM and Chk1 was achieved using small hairpin RNA (shRNA) plasmid constructs. In this condition, damaged mitotic cells did not accumulated in a G2-like stage, and entered into G1 phase without delay. Protein phosphatase 2A was responsible for dephosphorylation of mitotic Plk1 in response to DNA damage. In knockdown of PP2A catalytic subunits, Plk1 was not dephosphorylated, but rather degraded in response to DNA damage, and cells did not accumulate in G2-like phase. The effect of ATM/Chk1 inhibition was counteracted by overexpression of PP2A, indicated that PP2A may function as a downstream target of ATM/Chk1 at a mitotic DNA damage checkpoint, or may have a dominant effect on ATM/Chk1 function at this checkpoint. Finally, we have shown that negative regulation of Plk1 by dephosphorylation is important to cell accumulation in G2-like phase at the mitotic DNA damage checkpoint, and that this ATM/Chk1/PP2A pathway independent on p53 is a novel mechanism of cellular response to mitotic DNA damage.     

DNA damage signaling in response to double-strand breaks during mitosis

The signaling cascade initiated in response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) has been extensively investigated in interphase cells. Here, we show that mitotic cells treated with DSB-inducing agents activate a “primary” DNA damage response (DDR) comprised of early signaling events, including activation of the protein kinases ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), histone H2AX phosphorylation together with recruitment of mediator of DNA damage checkpoint 1 (MDC1), and the Mre11–Rad50–Nbs1 (MRN) complex to damage sites. However, mitotic cells display no detectable recruitment of the E3 ubiquitin ligases RNF8 and RNF168, or accumulation of 53BP1 and BRCA1, at DSB sites. Accordingly, we found that DNA-damage signaling is attenuated in mitotic cells, with full DDR activation only ensuing when a DSB-containing mitotic cell enters G1. Finally, we present data suggesting that induction of a primary DDR in mitosis is important because transient inactivation of ATM and DNA-PK renders mitotic cells hypersensitive to DSB-inducing agents.     

Downregulation of Wip1 phosphatase modulates the cellular threshold of DNA damage signaling in mitosis

Cells are constantly challenged by DNA damage and protect their genome integrity by activation of an evolutionary conserved DNA damage response pathway (DDR). A central core of DDR is composed of a spatiotemporally ordered net of post-translational modifications, among which protein phosphorylation plays a major role. Activation of checkpoint kinases ATM/ATR and Chk1/2 leads to a temporal arrest in cell cycle progression (checkpoint) and allows time for DNA repair. Following DNA repair, cells re-enter the cell cycle by checkpoint recovery. Wip1 phosphatase (also called PPM1D) dephosphorylates multiple proteins involved in DDR and is essential for timely termination of the DDR. Here we have investigated how Wip1 is regulated in the context of the cell cycle. We found that Wip1 activity is downregulated by several mechanisms during mitosis. Wip1 protein abundance increases from G₁ phase to G₂ and declines in mitosis. Decreased abundance of Wip1 during mitosis is caused by proteasomal degradation. In addition, Wip1 is phosphorylated at multiple residues during mitosis, and this leads to inhibition of its enzymatic activity. Importantly, ectopic expression of Wip1 reduced γH2AX staining in mitotic cells and decreased the number of 53BP1 nuclear bodies in G₁ cells. We propose that the combined decrease and inhibition of Wip1 in mitosis decreases the threshold necessary for DDR activation and enables cells to react adequately even to modest levels of DNA damage encountered during unperturbed mitotic progression.     

Polo-like kinase 1 inactivation following mitotic DNA damaging treatments is independent of ataxia telangiectasia mutated kinase

Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) is an important regulator of several events during mitosis. Recent reports show that Plk1 is involved in both G2 and mitotic DNA damage checkpoints. Ataxia telangiectasia mutated kinase (ATM) is an important enzyme involved in G2 phase cell cycle arrest following interphase DNA damage, and inhibition of Plk1 by DNA damage during G2 occurs in an ATM-/ATM-Rad3-related kinase (ATR)-dependent fashion. However, it is unclear how Plk1 is regulated in response to M phase DNA damage. We found that treatment of mitotic cells with DNA damaging agents inhibits Plk1 activity primarily through dephosphorylation of Plk1, which occurred in both p53 wild-type and mutant cells. Inhibition of Plk1 is not prevented by caffeine pretreatment that inhibits ATM activity and also occurs in ATM mutant cell lines. Furthermore, ATM mutant cell lines, unlike wild-type cells, fail to arrest after mitotic DNA damaging treatments. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor, LY294002, reduces Plk1 dephosphorylation following mitotic DNA damaging treatments, suggesting that the PI3K pathway may be involved in regulating Plk1 activity. Earlier studies showed that inhibition of Plk1 by G2 DNA damage occurs in an ATM-dependent fashion. Our results extend the previous studies by showing that ATM is not required for dephosphorylation and inhibition of Plk1 activity following mitotic DNA damage, and also suggest that Plk1 is not a principal regulator or mediator of the mitotic DNA damage response.     

Regulation of Polo-like kinase 1 by DNA damage in mitosis. Inhibition of mitotic PLK-1 by protein phosphatase 2A

DNA damage triggers multiple checkpoint pathways to arrest cell cycle progression. Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) is an important regulator of several events during mitosis. In addition to Plk1 functions in cell cycle, Plk1 is involved in DNA damage check-point in G2 phase. Normally, ataxia telangiectasia-mutated kinase (ATM) is a key enzyme involved in G2 phase cell cycle arrest following DNA damage, and inhibition of Plk1 by DNA damage during G2 occurs in a ATM/ATR-dependent manner. However, it is still unclear how Plk1 is regulated in response to DNA damage in mitosis in which Plk1 is already activated. Here, we show that treatment of mitotic cells with doxorubicin and gamma-irradiation inhibits Plk1 activity through dephosphorylation of Plk1, and cells were arrested in G2 phase. Treatments of the phosphatase inhibitors and siRNA experiments suggested that PP2A pathway might be involved in regulating mitotic Plk1 activity in mitotic DNA damage. Finally, we propose a novel pathway, which is connected between ATM/ATR/Chk and protein phosphatase-Plk1 in DNA damage response in mitosis.     

A Mitotic Phosphorylation Feedback Network Connects Cdk1, Plk1, 53BP1, and Chk2 to Inactivate the G2/M DNA Damage Checkpoint

DNA damage checkpoints arrest cell cycle progression to facilitate DNA repair. The ability to survive genotoxic insults depends not only on the initiation of cell cycle checkpoints but also on checkpoint maintenance. While activation of DNA damage checkpoints has been studied extensively, molecular mechanisms involved in sustaining and ultimately inactivating cell cycle checkpoints are largely unknown. Here, we explored feedback mechanisms that control the maintenance and termination of checkpoint function by computationally identifying an evolutionary conserved mitotic phosphorylation network within the DNA damage response. We demonstrate that the non-enzymatic checkpoint adaptor protein 53BP1 is an in vivo target of the cell cycle kinases Cyclin-dependent kinase-1 and Polo-like kinase-1 (Plk1). We show that Plk1 binds 53BP1 during mitosis and that this interaction is required for proper inactivation of the DNA damage checkpoint. 53BP1 mutants that are unable to bind Plk1 fail to restart the cell cycle after ionizing radiation-mediated cell cycle arrest. Importantly, we show that Plk1 also phosphorylates the 53BP1-binding checkpoint kinase Chk2 to inactivate its FHA domain and inhibit its kinase activity in mammalian cells. Thus, a mitotic kinase-mediated negative feedback loop regulates the ATM-Chk2 branch of the DNA damage signaling network by phosphorylating conserved sites in 53BP1 and Chk2 to inactivate checkpoint signaling and control checkpoint duration.     

Two- and Three-Dimensional Live Cell Imaging of DNA Damage Response Proteins

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most deleterious DNA lesions a cell can encounter. If left unrepaired, DSBs harbor great potential to generate mutations and chromosomal aberrations¹. To prevent this trauma from catalyzing genomic instability, it is crucial for cells to detect DSBs, activate the DNA damage response (DDR), and repair the DNA. When stimulated, the DDR works to preserve genomic integrity by triggering cell cycle arrest to allow for repair to take place or force the cell to undergo apoptosis. The predominant mechanisms of DSB repair occur through nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination repair (HRR) (reviewed in²). There are many proteins whose activities must be precisely orchestrated for the DDR to function properly. Herein, we describe a method for 2- and 3-dimensional (D) visualization of one of these proteins, 53BP1.The p53-binding protein 1 (53BP1) localizes to areas of DSBs by binding to modified histones^3,4, forming foci within 5-15 minutes⁵. The histone modifications and recruitment of 53BP1 and other DDR proteins to DSB sites are believed to facilitate the structural rearrangement of chromatin around areas of damage and contribute to DNA repair⁶. Beyond direct participation in repair, additional roles have been described for 53BP1 in the DDR, such as regulating an intra-S checkpoint, a G2/M checkpoint, and activating downstream DDR proteins^7-9. Recently, it was discovered that 53BP1 does not form foci in response to DNA damage induced during mitosis, instead waiting for cells to enter G1 before localizing to the vicinity of DSBs⁶. DDR proteins such as 53BP1 have been found to associate with mitotic structures (such as kinetochores) during the progression through mitosis¹⁰.In this protocol we describe the use of 2- and 3-D live cell imaging to visualize the formation of 53BP1 foci in response to the DNA damaging agent camptothecin (CPT), as well as 53BP1''s behavior during mitosis. Camptothecin is a topoisomerase I inhibitor that primarily causes DSBs during DNA replication. To accomplish this, we used a previously described 53BP1-mCherry fluorescent fusion protein construct consisting of a 53BP1 protein domain able to bind DSBs¹¹. In addition, we used a histone H2B-GFP fluorescent fusion protein construct able to monitor chromatin dynamics throughout the cell cycle but in particular during mitosis¹². Live cell imaging in multiple dimensions is an excellent tool to deepen our understanding of the function of DDR proteins in eukaryotic cells.     

DNA Damage to a Single Chromosome End Delays Anaphase Onset

Chromosome ends contain nucleoprotein structures known as telomeres. Damage to chromosome ends during interphase elicits a DNA damage response (DDR) resulting in cell cycle arrest. However, little is known regarding the signaling from damaged chromosome ends (designated here as “TIPs”) during mitosis. In the present study, we investigated the consequences of DNA damage induced at a single TIP in mitosis. We used laser microirradiation to damage mitotic TIPs or chromosome arms (non-TIPs) in PtK2 kidney epithelial cells. We found that damage to a single TIP, but not a non-TIP, delays anaphase onset. This TIP-specific checkpoint response is accompanied by differential recruitment of DDR proteins. Although phosphorylation of H2AX and the recruitment of several repair factors, such as Ku70-Ku80, occur in a comparable manner at both TIP and non-TIP damage sites, DDR factors such as ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), MDC1, WRN, and FANCD2 are specifically recruited to TIPs but not to non-TIPs. In addition, Nbs1, BRCA1, and ubiquitin accumulate at damaged TIPs more rapidly than at damaged non-TIPs. ATR and 53BP1 are not detected at either TIPs or non-TIPs in mitosis. The observed delay in anaphase onset is dependent on the activity of DDR kinases ATM and Chk1, and the spindle assembly checkpoint kinase Mps1. Cells damaged at a single TIP or non-TIP eventually exit mitosis with unrepaired lesions. Damaged TIPs are segregated into micronuclei at a significantly higher frequency than damaged non-TIPs. Together, these findings reveal a mitosis-specific DDR uniquely associated with chromosome ends.     

Dephosphorylation of Plk1 occurs through PP2A-B55/ENSA/Greatwall pathway during mitotic DNA damage recovery

Recovery from DNA damage is critical for cell survival. However, serious damage cannot be repaired, leading to cell death for prevention of abnormal cell growth. Previously, we demonstrated that 4N-DNA accumulates via the initiation of an abnormal interphase without cytokinesis and that re-replication occurs during a prolonged recovery period in the presence of severe DNA damage in mitotic cells. Mitotic phosphorylated Plk1 is typically degraded during mitotic exit. However, Plk1 has unusually found to be dephosphorylated in mitotic slippage without cytokinesis during recovery from mitotic DNA damage. Here, we investigated how Plk1 dephosphorylation is established during recovery from mitotic DNA damage. Mitotic DNA damage activated ATM and Chk1/2 and repressed Cdk1 and Greatwall protein kinase, followed by PP2A activation through the dissociation of ENSA and PP2A-B55. Interaction between Plk1 and PP2A-B55α or PP2A-B55δ was strongly induced during recovery from mitotic DNA damage. Moreover, the depletion of PP2A-B55α and/or PP2A-B55δ by siRNA transfection led to the recovery of Plk1 phosphorylation and progression of the cell cycle into the G₁ phase. Therefore, to adapt to severe DNA damage, the activated Greatwall/ENSA signaling pathway was repressed by ATM/Chk1/2, even in mitotic cells. Activation of the PP2A-B55 holoenzyme complex induced the dephosphorylation of Plk1 and Cdk1, and finally, mitotic slippage occurred without normal chromosome segregation and cytokinesis.     

ATM/Wip1 activities at chromatin control Plk1 re‐activation to determine G2 checkpoint duration

After DNA damage, the cell cycle is arrested to avoid propagation of mutations. Arrest in G2 phase is initiated by ATM‐/ATR‐dependent signaling that inhibits mitosis‐promoting kinases such as Plk1. At the same time, Plk1 can counteract ATR‐dependent signaling and is required for eventual resumption of the cell cycle. However, what determines when Plk1 activity can resume remains unclear. Here, we use FRET‐based reporters to show that a global spread of ATM activity on chromatin and phosphorylation of ATM targets including KAP1 control Plk1 re‐activation. These phosphorylations are rapidly counteracted by the chromatin‐bound phosphatase Wip1, allowing cell cycle restart despite persistent ATM activity present at DNA lesions. Combining experimental data and mathematical modeling, we propose a model for how the minimal duration of cell cycle arrest is controlled. Our model shows how cell cycle restart can occur before completion of DNA repair and suggests a mechanism for checkpoint adaptation in human cells.     

Keeping 53BP1 out of focus in mitosis

A recent study published in Science reveals the mechanism and biological importance of DNA damage response abrogation in mitotic cells.For many years, much research has focused on understanding how cells maintain genome integrity despite DNA being constantly challenged by factors of both endogenous and exogenous nature. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most deleterious DNA lesions, and if left unrepaired or repaired incorrectly, a single DSB can trigger genome instability or even cell death¹. Therefore, any DSB has to be recognized and repaired by processes encompassed within the DNA damage response (DDR). Notably, while the ends of mammalian linear chromosomes naturally resemble DSBs, their structure and association with the so-called “Shelterin” complex normally makes them invisible to the DDR².As soon as a DSB is formed, it is sensed and directly bound by the Ku70-Ku80 and/or MRE11-NBS1-RAD50 protein complexes, which recruit and activate the DDR kinases DNA-PKcs and ATM, respectively. The first steps in the DDR to DSBs are followed by cascades of events involving protein post-translational modifications (PTMs) and formation of large protein assemblies at DSB sites known as ionizing radiation-induced foci (IRIF)³. Protein phosphorylation and ubiquitylation are at the heart of these signaling processes³. For example, following recruitment of the DDR mediator protein MDC1 to the phospho-epitope created by ATM and DNA-PKcs on variant histone H2AX, MDC1 is itself phosphorylated by ATM on multiple serines and threonines⁴. MDC1 phosphorylation on a group of threonines near its N-terminus and conforming to the consensus TQXF generates binding sites for the FHA domain of E3-ubiquitin ligase RNF8^5,6. Together with the E2-conjugating enzyme UBC13, RNF8, and another E3 ligase, RNF168, trigger formation of mainly lysine 63-linked ubiquitin adducts in DSB-proximal chromatin, promoting recruitment of downstream factors necessary for DNA repair, such as the RAP80-Abraxas-BRCA1 complex and 53BP1³.Significantly, the full DDR happens only in interphase cells, whereas if mitotic cells sustain DSBs, the process appears to be blocked at the stage of RNF8 recruitment, resulting in IRIF devoid of detectable ubiquitin conjugates⁷. Consequently, 53BP1 and BRCA1 are not recruited to IRIF during mitosis. Even more strikingly, although RNF8 and RNF168 are associated with mitotic IRIF in anaphase, hyperphosphorylated 53BP1 remains excluded from chromatin until cells progress into G1 phase⁷. Based on these findings, it was hypothesized that mitosis-specific PTMs on RNF8 and 53BP1 might preclude formation of repair-competent IRIF⁷. However, the precise mechanistic explanation of the “interrupted” DDR in mitosis remained to be unravelled.A recent study published in Science by the group of Daniel Durocher addressed the question of how full IRIF assembly and DSB repair are prevented in mitotic cells⁸. First, Orthwein et al. focused on the mechanism that abrogates RNF8 recruitment to DSBs during mitosis. They demonstrated that CDK1-dependent mitosis-specific phosphorylation of RNF8 on T198 abolished interaction between RNF8 and its target phospho-TQXF motifs in MDC1. This important finding was somewhat surprising, given that MDC1 binding is mediated by the RNF8 FHA domain^5,6 and T198 is located some distance away from this domain. It will thus be interesting to see how T198 phosphorylation abrogates MDC1 binding, for example via T198 being juxtaposed to the FHA domain in the RNF8 3D structure, through phosphorylated T198 docking with the phospho-binding region of the FHA domain, or via another mechanism. In this regard, we note that T198 is part of an STP motif, which upon modification by CDK1 could constitute a priming site for PLK1 kinase⁹. Thus, T198 phosphorylation might be followed by PLK1-mediated RNF8 phosphorylation. Interestingly, certain sites in RNF8 conform to the PLK1 consensus motif, with those at T39 and T316 being evolutionarily conserved in vertebrates. Moreover, T39 is located in the FHA domain, close to R42, mutation of which abolishes RNF8 interaction with MDC1^5,6. It would therefore be worthwhile mutating these potential PLK1 sites and establishing whether this affects mitotic control of RNF8 binding to MDC1.After identifying T198 as critical for preventing RNF8 recruitment to DSBs during mitosis, Orthwein et al. observed that, while mutating this residue to alanine restored recruitment of RNF8 (and BRCA1) to mitotic IRIF, 53BP1 still remained excluded from DSB sites. This prompted the authors to look for mitosis-specific PTMs of 53BP1 by mass spectrometry, leading to the discovery of two novel phosphosites mapped to the recently described ubiquitin-dependent recruitment (UDR) motif, which mediates binding to ubiquitylated H2A and is required for 53BP1 IRIF formation¹⁰. Notably, the same residues, T1609 and S1618, were also identified by Chowdhury and colleagues¹¹ as target sites for the PP4C/R3β phosphatase. This group showed that T1609 and S1618 must be dephosphorylated for 53BP1 to form IRIF. In accord with these findings, Orthwein et al. established that when T1609 and S1618 were mutated to alanines, the ensuing “53BP1-TASA” protein was recruited to sites of DNA damage during mitosis in cells expressing RNF8-T198A. Moreover, unlike normal cells, cells co-expressing RNF8-T198A and 53BP1-TASA carried out DSB joining reactions during mitosis and were extremely hypersensitive to ionizing radiation (IR). The authors also found that, following irradiation in mitosis, cells carrying these mutant RNF8 and 53BP1 proteins displayed increased rates of kinetochore-positive micronucleus formation, suggesting mis-segregation of full chromosomes. In addition, chromosomes in these cells were prone to sister telomere fusions, thereby helping to explain their elevated levels of aneuploidy and IR hypersensitivity.The research described above has not only revealed how DSB repair is suppressed in mitosis but has also established that this suppression is biologically important. Orthwein et al. propose that, as mitotic telomeres become “underprotected” when mitosis is prolonged upon stress¹², this could lead to telomere fusion if DNA end-joining pathway is active. The suppression of DSB signaling and repair mediated by RNF8 and 53BP1 mitotic phosphorylation therefore probably evolved as a mechanism to mitigate this threat to genome stability. A key question that still remains is why mitotic telomeres become underprotected in the first place? Also, what features in telomere structure or replication and segregation processes make it more beneficial for the cells to keep chromosome ends less protected at the cost of inhibiting the DDR during mitosis? Finally, given that cancers often harbor cell cycle and/or DDR defects¹, it will be of interest to see whether defective mitotic control of DSB repair might play a role in tumor evolution, or could provide opportunities for developing better anti-cancer therapies.     

USP14 regulates DNA damage repair by targeting RNF168-dependent ubiquitination

Recent reports have made important revelations, uncovering direct regulation of DNA damage response (DDR)-associated proteins and chromatin ubiquitination (Ubn) by macroautophagy/autophagy. Here, we report a previously unexplored connection between autophagy and DDR, via a deubiquitnase (DUB), USP14. Loss of autophagy in prostate cancer cells led to unrepaired DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) as indicated by persistent ionizing radiation (IR)-induced foci (IRIF) formation for γH2AFX, and decreased protein levels and IRIF formation for RNF168, an E3-ubiquitin ligase essential for chromatin Ubn and recruitment of critical DDR effector proteins in response to DSBs, including TP53BP1. Consistently, RNF168-associated Ubn signaling and TP53BP1 IRIF formation were reduced in autophagy-deficient cells. An activity assay identified several DUBs, including USP14, which showed higher activity in autophagy-deficient cells. Importantly, inhibiting USP14 could overcome DDR defects in autophagy-deficient cells. USP14 IRIF formation and protein stability were increased in autophagy-deficient cells. Co-immunoprecipitation and colocalization of USP14 with MAP1LC3B and the UBA-domain of SQSTM1 identified USP14 as a substrate of autophagy and SQSTM1. Additionally, USP14 directly interacted with RNF168, which depended on the MIU1 domain of RNF168. These findings identify USP14 as a novel substrate of autophagy and regulation of RNF168-dependent Ubn and TP53BP1 recruitment by USP14 as a critical link between DDR and autophagy. Given the role of Ubn signaling in non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), the major pathway for repair of IR-induced DNA damage, these findings provide unique insights into the link between autophagy, DDR-associated Ubn signaling and NHEJ DNA repair.

Abbreviations: ATG7: autophagy related 7; CQ: chloroquine; DDR: DNA damage response; DUB: deubiquitinase; HR: homologous recombination; IR: ionizing radiation; IRIF: ionizing radiation-induced foci; LAMP2: lysosomal associated membrane protein 2; MAP1LC3B/LC3B: microtubule associated protein 1 light chain 3 beta; MIU1: motif interacting with ubiquitin; NHEJ: non homologous end-joining; PCa: prostate cancer; TP53BP1/53BP1: tumor protein p53 binding protein 1; RNF168: ring finger protein 168; SQSTM1/p62 sequestosome 1; γH2AFX/γH2AX: H2A histone family member X: phosphorylated, UBA: ubiquitin-associated; Ub: ubiquitin; Ubn: ubiquitination; USP14: ubiquitin specific peptidase 14.     

Close encounters of the RNF8th kind: when chromatin meets DNA repair

Cells counteract the adverse effects of chromosome breakage by activating the DNA damage response (DDR), which entails a coordinated series of events that regulate cell cycle progression and repair of DNA lesions. The packaging of genomic DNA into condensed, often inaccessible chromatin severely complicates efficient DNA damage repair in living cells. Recent studies implicate a large number of chromatin-modifying enzymes in the DDR, suggesting a stepwise model in which chromatin is continually reconfigured to accommodate the association and action of repair factors during the different stages of the DDR. Emerging evidence suggests that the histone ubiquitin ligases RNF8/RNF168 act in concert with ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling enzymes to orchestrate the signalling and repair of DNA lesions in specific chromatin topologies.     

Nucleolin Participates in DNA Double-Strand Break-Induced Damage Response through MDC1-Dependent Pathway

H2AX is an important factor for chromatin remodeling to facilitate accumulation of DNA damage-related proteins at DNA double-strand break (DSB) sites. In order to further understand the role of H2AX in the DNA damage response (DDR), we attempted to identify H2AX-interacting proteins by proteomics analysis. As a result, we identified nucleolin as one of candidates. Here, we show a novel role of a major nucleolar protein, nucleolin, in DDR. Nucleolin interacted with γ-H2AX and accumulated to laser micro-irradiated DSB damage sites. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation assay also displayed the accumulation of nucleolin around DSB sites. Nucleolin-depleted cells exhibited repression of both ATM-dependent phosphorylation following exposure to γ-ray and subsequent cell cycle checkpoint activation. Furthermore, nucleolin-knockdown reduced HR and NHEJ activity and showed decrease in IR-induced chromatin accumulation of HR/NHEJ factors, agreeing with the delayed kinetics of γ-H2AX focus. Moreover, nucleolin-knockdown decreased MDC1-related events such as focus formation of 53 BP1, RNF168, phosphorylated ATM, and H2A ubiquitination. Nucleolin also showed FACT-like activity for DSB damage-induced histone eviction from chromatin. Taken together, nucleolin could promote both ATM-dependent cell cycle checkpoint and DSB repair by functioning in an MDC1-related pathway through its FACT-like function.     

DNA damage response is suppressed by the high cyclin-dependent kinase 1 activity in mitotic mammalian cells

DNA damage response (DDR) is vital for genomic stability, and its deficiency is linked to tumorigenesis. Extensive studies in interphase (G(1)-S-G(2)) mammalian cells have revealed the mechanisms of DDR in great detail; however, how mitotic cells respond to DNA damage remains less defined. We report here that a full DDR is suppressed in mitotic mammalian cells until telophase/cytokinesis. Although early DDR markers such as the phosphorylations of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and histone H2A.x (H2AX) can be readily detected, the ionizing radiation-induced foci (IRIF) formation of late DDR markers such as breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1) and p53-binding protein 1 (53BP1) are absent until the telophase/cytokinesis stage. We further showed that the IR-induced ubiquitination cascade around DNA damage sites did not occur in mitotic cells, which explains, at least in part, why BRCA1 and 53BP1 cannot be recruited to the damaged sites. These observations indicate that DDR is suppressed in mitotic cells after the step of γH2AX formation. Not surprisingly, we found that the absence of a full DDR in mitotic cells was associated with the high cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) activities. More 53BP1 IRIF could be detected when the irradiated mitotic cells were treated with a CDK1 inhibitor. Further, the activation of CDK5 in interphase cells impedes the formation of 53BP1 IRIF. Together, these results suggest that the DDR is suppressed by the high CDK1 activity in mitotic mammalian cells.