The possible role of lipid peroxidation in breast cancer risk

Breast cancer remains the commonest cause of death from cancer in women in most of the Western world. There is considerable evidence that breast cancer risk is influenced by environmental factors and can therefore potentially be modified. In this paper we describe evidence suggesting a relationship of lipid peroxidation to breast cancer risk, and propose that the method used to generate this information might usefully be applied to other disease states, and make some suggestions for further work. We have compared the urinary excretion of the mutagen malonaldehyde (MDA) in premenopausal women at different risks for breast cancer as determined by the appearance of the breast parenchyma on mammography. MDA was measured in 24-h urine samples from both groups and excretion in 30 women with mammographic dysplasia (high risk) was found to be approximately double that of 16 women without these radiological changes (p less than 0.02). These results suggest that mammographic dysplasia may be associated with lipid peroxidation. Further study of environmental factors associated with states that precede the development of breast and other cancers may lead to the identification of factors that can be modified and that may prevent the development of malignant disease.     

Risk factors for breast cancer in women biopsied for benign breast disease: A nested case-control study

Aim: Women with a history of benign breast disease are at increased risk of subsequent breast cancer. However, few studies have examined whether established breast cancer risk factors other than histology are associated with an altered risk of breast cancer in women with benign breast disease. We used a nested case-control design within a large, multi-center cohort of women biopsied for benign breast disease (BBD) to estimate odds ratios for breast cancer in association with exposure to a range of personal and lifestyle factors. Methods: Cases were women biopsied for BBD who subsequently developed breast cancer; controls were individually matched to cases on center and age at diagnosis and were women biopsied for BBD who did not develop breast cancer in the same follow-up interval as that for the cases. After excluding women with prevalent breast cancer, 1357 records (661 case records and 696 records) were available for analysis. We used conditional logistic regression to obtain crude and multivariable-adjusted estimates of the association between specific factors and risk of breast cancer. Results: In multivariable analyses age at first live birth, number of pregnancies, and postmenopausal status were inversely associated with risk of breast cancer. The odds ratio for women with age at first birth <25 years and ≥3 pregnancies, relative to nulliparous women, was 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.13–0.79, and that for postmenopausal women relative to premenopausal women was 0.60, 95% CI 0.37–0.99. Conclusions: Further study of personal factors influencing the risk of breast cancer in women with BBD may help to identify subgroups of the population at increased risk of invasive disease.     

Analysis of 5382insC (BRCA1) and 6174delT (BRCA2) mutations in 382 healthy Chilean women with a family history of breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women. Chilean studies reveal that this cancer presents the third highest mortality rate. A family history of breast cancer is one of the major risk factors for the development of this disease. BRCA1 and BRCA2 are the two main hereditary breast cancer susceptibility genes, and mutations in these genes are related to inherited breast cancer. In specific populations only some mutations have been found to be associated with susceptibility. The purpose of this study was to establish the frequency of 5382insC (BRCA1) and 6174delT (BRCA2) germline mutations in 382 healthy Chilean women with at least two relatives affected with breast cancer and in probands and their relatives from 8 high risk families for breast cancer, using mismatch PCR assay. The results obtained showed that 5382insC and 6174delT mutations were not found in either of the groups studied. The ethnic origin of the contemporary Chilean population and the data reported in the literature suggest that these mutations may be absent or have a very low frequency in this population.. This genetic study is part of a breast cancer screening program that also includes annual mammography and clinical breast examination over a five-year period. Strategies to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with breast cancer lie in early detection in women with genetic risk.     

The relationship between factors affecting endogenous oestradiol levels in postmenopausal women and breast cancer

Breast cancer accounts for 1 in 4 of all female cancers worldwide; approaching 13,000 women dying per year in the UK alone. Seventy five per cent of all diagnosed breast cancers are oestrogen receptor (ER) positive. Ovarian synthesis of oestrogens ceases at menopause and as breast cancer is more prevalent in postmenopausal women the non-ovarian sources of oestrogen are important in disease progression. There is now considerable evidence that associates increased breast cancer risk with prolonged exposure to oestrogens hence greater attention is now being given to determining whether the measurement of plasma oestrogen may assist in identifying chemoprevention target groups. Studies suggest that in most postmenopausal patients the intra-tumoural concentrations of oestrogens are up to 20-fold higher than those present in the plasma however, while the extent of biosynthesis of oestrogens within breast tissue is a major determinant of local exposure, plasma levels are a useful indicator of overall metabolism in peripheral tissues. As such it is important to understand factors that influence these measurements. This review summarises the impact of lifestyle such as body mass index, together with the role of genetic polymorphisms placed within the context of designing future epidemiological studies and breast cancer risk algorithms.     

Understanding breast cancer risk ‐ where do we stand in 2005?

Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer in women and represents the second leading cause of cancer death among women (after lung cancer). The etiology of breast cancer is still poorly understood with known breast cancer risk factors explaining only a small proportion of cases. Risk factors that modulate the development of breast cancer discussed in this review include: age, geographic location (country of origin) and socioeconomic status, reproductive events, exogenous hormones, lifestyle risk factors (alcohol, diet, obesity and physical activity), familial history of breast cancer, mammographic density, history of benign breast disease, ionizing radiation, bone density, height, IGF- 1 and prolactin levels, chemopreventive agents. Additionally, we summarized breast cancer risk associated with the following genetic factors: breast cancer susceptibility high-penetrance genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, p53, PTEN, ATM, NBS1 or LKB1) and low-penetrance genes such as cytochrome P450 genes (CYP1A1, CYP2D6, CYP19), glutathione S-transferase family (GSTM1, GSTP1), alcohol and one-carbon metabolism genes (ADH1C and MTHFR), DNA repair genes (XRCC1, XRCC3, ERCC4/XPF) and genes encoding cell signaling molecules (PR, ER, TNFalpha or HSP70). All these factors contribute to a better understanding of breast cancer risk. Nonetheless, in order to evaluate more accurately the overall risk of breast tumorigenesis, novel genetic and phenotypic traits need to be identified.     

Establishing a molecular continuum in breast cancer DNA microarrays and benign breast disease.

Although the risk of breast cancer for women in the United States is approximately 1 in 9, identification of risk factors and translation of that knowledge into strategies for prevention have been inhibited by poor understanding of disease pathogenesis. A few benign breast proliferations are associated with higher risks of breast cancer, but definition of a preneoplastic morphologic continuum is lacking. If progression from a premalignant state to malignancy is accompanied by genetic changes, then identification in benign breast disease lesions (BBD) of alterations similar to those found in breast cancer should strengthen the perception of BBD as a premalignant condition. Current testing for hereditary breast cancer susceptibility presumes that only women with invasive breast or ovarian cancer are gene carriers. Therefore, neither in situ breast cancer nor atypical hyperplasias are considered clinically as evidence of a breast-ovarian syndrome, nor are these diagnoses used to predict carrier status within at-risk families. This reflects lack of evidence that breast cancer develops along a recognized morphologic continuum from precursor lesions. New mutation screening procedures such as DNA microarrays can provide sensitivity, specificity, and high throughput that circumvent limitations imposed on the scope of molecular marker analyses applied to archival resources. We have studied a BRCA1-mutant individual with loss of the wild type BRCA1 allele in benign breast proliferations. Both her benign and malignant lesions showed molecularly identical TP53 mutations, indicating that significant genetic alterations can occur in BBD and supporting the clonal evolution from BBD to malignancy.     

Role of xenobiotic metabolizing gene polymorphisms in breast cancer susceptibility and treatment outcome

Metabolic activation and inactivation of potential genotoxic agents occur by Phase I and Phase II enzymes in multiple interactions. An expanding body of literature demonstrates that ethnic differences in breast cancer incidence may be partly caused by host genetic factors particularly genetic polymorphisms of these carcinogen-metabolizing enzymes. The present case-control study aimed at identification of such low penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes in 224 Indian women and to investigate the potential effects of their polymorphisms on sporadic breast cancer risk. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the effects of genetic polymorphisms of the xenobiotic metabolizing genes CYP1A1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 on breast cancer risk by PCR-RFLP and DNA sequencing. Our results showed a significant association between CYP1A1 m1, m2 polymorphisms and breast cancer risk; however there was a lack of association between GSTM1 null deletion and breast cancer. The associations of CYP1A1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes with breast cancer risk were more pronounced among the pre-menopausal patients. Combined genotype analysis revealed the CYP1A1 m2 ValVal-GSTM1 homozygous null deletion genotype combinations to be associated with the highest risk of breast cancer (OR=10.3, 95% CI=1.2-86.1). Correlations with clinicopathological factors and treatment outcome were also analyzed for predicting disease free survival by univariate and multivariate analysis. Significant differences in disease free survival between the wild and polymorphic genotypes were observed only for CYP1A1 m2, GSTT1 genotypes. Our results based on the analysis of functionally relevant polymorphisms in these low penetrance genes may provide a better model that would exhibit additive effects on individual susceptibility to breast cancer. Such genotype analysis resulting in a high-risk profile holds considerable promise for individualizing screening and therapeutic intervention in breast cancer. Hence, the present study may provide strong supportive evidence for genetic interactions in the etiology of breast cancer.     

Risk assessment issues in breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy affecting women, and its incidence has been increasing in many countries. The aetiology of breast cancer is poorly understood, so there is concern as to which factors in our environment or lifestyle are responsible for the increase. There is a need for reliable risk assessment, which involves the steps of hazard identification, hazard evaluation, exposure evaluation and risk estimation. Short-term laboratory tests and long-term tests in animals are useful for priority-setting, but quantitative human risk assessment should preferably involve observations of humans. Epidemiological studies vary in the degree of reliance that can be placed on their results. The main types of epidemiological investigation are illustrated by recent examples from the literature on breast cancer. Careful judgement is required in assessing whether any association between a factor and a disease is likely to be causal. The injectable contraceptive, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA, ‘Depo-Provera’), has been controversial because it caused malignant mammary tumours in beagle dogs. Two recent case-control studies found no overall association between DMPA and the risk of breast cancer in women. There was some evidence of increased risk in certain sub-groups of women, which could be interpreted with more confidence if there were a better understanding of the biology of human breast cancer. Nevertheless, the results do not support the prediction from beagle experiments that DMPA might increase the overall risk of breast cancer.     

Does genetic counseling have any impact on management of breast cancer risk?

Despite there being an increasing literature on the impact of cancer genetic counseling on risk perception and mental health, there is a lack of data describing impact on risk management. Genetic counseling and testing for cancer predisposition genes aims to improve the future health of those at high risk through appropriate surveillance and screening. However, management of breast cancer risk in women with a family history of this disease is an area of controversy. Counseling services may recommend specific risk management options to women, who then rely on their local screening service to make provision. This study investigated the impact of genetic counseling on management of breast cancer risk in women attending Cancer Family Clinics. A total of 293 women attending four genetic clinics were enrolled. Rates of breast self-examination, clinical breast examination, mammography, biopsy, detected cancers, and other screenings were documented. Participants' perceived benefits and barriers to mammography were assessed along with cancer worry. Results show that rates of mammography, clinical breast examination, and breast self-examination were increased following clinic attendance (p < 0.001). Women in the under 35 age-group had limited access to screening. Rates for biopsy and detected cancers were low. Women reported positive attitudes to mammography, with few reported barriers. Contrary to previous studies, there was no evidence that anxiety about breast cancer impedes uptake of health surveillance methods. Genetic counseling had a positive impact on management of breast cancer risk. Whether this translates into future health gains remains to be established.     

Endogenous oestrogens and breast cancer risk in premenopausal and postmenopausal women

Breast cancer risk is strongly related to several reproductive and hormonal factors, but the nature of the effects of endogenous oestrogens has been difficult to establish. Data are now available from several large prospective studies with biobanks of stored serum, enabling better characterization of the associations of endogenous oestrogens, and other endogenous hormones, with breast cancer risk. In postmenopausal women, relatively high serum concentrations of oestradiol are associated with a more than twofold increase in the risk for breast cancer, and this probably explains the increase in risk in obese postmenopausal women. In premenopausal women the data available on oestrogens are more limited and difficult to interpret due to the large variations in endogenous oestrogens during the menstrual cycle, but are compatible with a positive association between oestradiol and breast cancer risk. There is also evidence that breast cancer risk is positively associated with androgens, prolactin and insulin-like growth factor-I. Further data are required, with better assays and repeat measures, to provide more accurate estimates of risk and to clarify the role of oestrogens in premenopausal women and the roles of other endogenous hormones.     

Breast cancer in sub-Saharan Africa: The current state and uncertain future

Breast cancer is the commonest cause of global cancer-related deaths in women and a public health burden in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Although the disease incidence in SSA seems lower, mortality rates are disproportionately high in comparison to high-income countries. The global disease burden is growing, with SSA reporting the majority of cases; however, the dearth of information results in insufficient data which is barely representative of the actual disease burden in this population. Future incidence predictions assign the subregion with a majority of the cases and associated deaths. Breast cancer presents with racial and ethnic variations, and available evidence suggests geographical diversity and persistent risk factors that have barely been explored in SSA. Breast cancer is a complex genetic disease, but the genetic risk factors in the extant African population, which is the most genetically diverse population, is scant and of low quality. This review focuses on the burden, prevalence, detection, treatment, survival, biology, as well as risk factors, and reinforces the need for breast cancer-associated risk factor investigation and population-specific studies in SSA.     

Pre-diagnosis lifestyle,health history and psychosocial factors associated with stage at breast cancer diagnosis – Potential targets to shift stage earlier

BackgroundEarly detection of breast cancer improves survival, so identifying factors associated with stage at diagnosis may help formulate cancer prevention messages tailored for higher risk women. The goal of this study was to evaluate associations between multiple potential risk factors, including novel ones, measured before a breast cancer diagnosis and stage at diagnosis in women from Alberta, Canada.MethodsWomen enrolled in Alberta’s Tomorrow Project completed health and lifestyle questionnaires on average 7 years before their breast cancer diagnosis. The association of previously identified and novel predictors with stage (I, II and III + IV) at diagnosis were simultaneously evaluated in partial proportional odds ordinal (PPO) regression models.ResultsThe 492 women in this study were predominantly diagnosed in Stage 1 (51.4%), had college or university education (75.4%), were married or had a partner (74.6%), had been pregnant (90.2%), had taken birth control pills for any reason (86.8%), and had an average body mass index of 26.6. Most had at least one mammogram (83%) with five mammograms the average number. Nearly all reported previously having a breast health examination from a medical practitioner (92.5%). Statistically significant factors identified in the PPO model included protective ones (older age at diagnosis, high household income, parity, smoking, spending time in the sun during high ultraviolet times, having a mammogram and high daily protein intake) and ones that increased risk of later stage at diagnosis (a comorbidity, current stressful situations and high daily caloric intake).ConclusionShifting breast cancer stage at diagnosis downwards may potentially be achieved through cancer prevention programs that target higher risk groups such as women with co-morbidities, non-smokers and younger women who may be eligible for breast cancer screening.     

Methylation of progesterone receptor isoform A promoter in normal breast tissue: An epigenetic link between early age at menarche and risk of breast cancer?

Emerging evidence indicates that some altered patterns of methylation that occur in breast tumors may also be found in breast tissue of healthy women in relation to the breast cancer (BC) risk factors. Progesterone receptor (PR) isoform α is a crucial regulator of breast hormone responsiveness and its hypermethylation plays an important role in the initiation and development of breast tumors. However, such a methylation change in healthy women and its link with the different risk factors has not yet been investigated. In the present study, we aimed to examine the relationship of possible methylation changes within a critical region in the promoter CpG island of PGR-α (progesterone receptor α) gene in the healthy women with a set of reproductive and nonreproductive BC risk factors. The breast tissues were collected from 120 cancer-free women who had undergone cosmetic mammoplasty. The genomic DNA was extracted from the breast tissues and the methylation level of PGR-α promoter CpG island was determined by using MeDIP-qPCR assay. Using regression analysis, we found that increasing menarche age is inversely associated with the high methylation of PGR-α promoter ( β = −0.790, SE = 0.362; P = 0.031). Although lactating women had more methylation than nonlactating women (P = 0.026, the t test), this result was not confirmed by regression models. Such an observation may be helpful in better understanding of the underlying mechanisms by which early age at menarche increases the risk of BC. However, this perspective requires further validations in larger studies of more subjects as well as the inclusion of other related genes.     

Evidence That Breast Tissue Stiffness Is Associated with Risk of Breast Cancer

Background

Evidence from animal models shows that tissue stiffness increases the invasion and progression of cancers, including mammary cancer. We here use measurements of the volume and the projected area of the compressed breast during mammography to derive estimates of breast tissue stiffness and examine the relationship of stiffness to risk of breast cancer.

Methods

Mammograms were used to measure the volume and projected areas of total and radiologically dense breast tissue in the unaffected breasts of 362 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer (cases) and 656 women of the same age who did not have breast cancer (controls). Measures of breast tissue volume and the projected area of the compressed breast during mammography were used to calculate the deformation of the breast during compression and, with the recorded compression force, to estimate the stiffness of breast tissue. Stiffness was compared in cases and controls, and associations with breast cancer risk examined after adjustment for other risk factors.

Results

After adjustment for percent mammographic density by area measurements, and other risk factors, our estimate of breast tissue stiffness was significantly associated with breast cancer (odds ratio = 1.21, 95% confidence interval = 1.03, 1.43, p = 0.02) and improved breast cancer risk prediction in models with percent mammographic density, by both area and volume measurements.

Conclusion

An estimate of breast tissue stiffness was associated with breast cancer risk and improved risk prediction based on mammographic measures and other risk factors. Stiffness may provide an additional mechanism by which breast tissue composition is associated with risk of breast cancer and merits examination using more direct methods of measurement.     

Breast cancer 2004: Progress and promise on the clinical front

Carcinoma of the breast is the most common cancer in u.s. women (excluding skin cancer), and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality. In 2004, it is estimated that 215,000 u.s. women will develop invasive breast cancer, and 40,000 women will die of the disease. Advancing age and female sex are the two greatest risk factors for the development of breast cancer, although family history, reproductive and hormonal history, lifestyle and environmental factors all contribute to risk. Models are available to help estimate risk of developing breast cancer in individual patients. Inherited mutations, specifically in the genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, account for approximately 5–10% of all breast cancer cases. Significant advances have recently been made in both the primary prevention of breast cancer (including chemoprevention), and secondary prevention (early detection through breast imaging). Breast mri as a tool for screening high risk women is a particularly exciting new tool.When breast cancer is diagnosed, optimal treatment involves a multidisciplinary approach, including surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic therapies. In the field of breast surgery, breast conservation and sentinel lymph node biopsy techniques have allowed substantially decreased surgery in appropriated selected patients with corresponding decreases in complication rates and long-term sequelae. Radiation oncologists are comparing partial breast irradiation versus conventional whole breast radiation in an attempt to minimize toxicity and treatment time, and maximize efficacy. The field of breast medical oncology has evolved at a rapid pace in the past decade, with numerous new hormonal agents, chemotherapeutic agents, and biologically targeted therapies in clinical use and under investigation. The addition of ‘adjuvant’ systemic therapy to the treatment of early stage breast cancer patients has dramatically reduced relapse and death rates. Unfortunately, metastatic recurrence still occurs. Once the cancer has spread beyond the breast and locoregional nodal areas it is felt to be incurable, although still treatable. A better understanding of breast cancer biology has led to the development of a host of new biologically targeted agents, many of which hold substantial promise for improving quality of life and survival rates in metastatic breast cancer patients.     

Hormonal aspects in the causation of human breast cancer: epidemiological hypotheses reviewed, with special reference to nutritional status and first pregnancy

Epidemiology of breast cancer has identified early age at menarche, late first pregnancy, low parity and late menopause as risk factors, but in addition genetic factors, height, weight and living in western countries play a significant role. The international variation in incidence is almost exclusively due to non-genetic factors. Hypotheses in prevention-oriented research are reviewed: 1. obesity-related oestrogen production as a stimulus of the tumour in postmenopausal women; 2. nutritional status and energy expenditure during puberty and adolescence, developed for fertility and fecundity and extended later to breast cancer; 3. reproductive life during early adulthood, age at first pregnancy and its specific effects on breast tissues. The message of preventability of breast cancer is that mammary epithelial differentiation should come early. Our insight concerning events in puberty and early adulthood can be consolidated in one concept on the risk of extended proliferation of breast epithelium during early adulthood in the absence of full differentiation induced by pregnancy. The combined effects of Western-type nutrition, lack of exercise and Western-type women's emancipation sets the stage for breast cancer already at a young age. Since it is unlikely that emancipated women in affluent societies will return to the original life-style of getting pregnant as soon as it is biologically possible, a novel daring way of protection has to be considered. Could a "Breast Differentiation Pill" be developed to offer protection?     

The role of inflammation and its related microRNAs in breast cancer: A narrative review

Breast cancer is recognized as the most common type of cancer among women with a high rate of mortality all over the world. Over the past years, growing attention has been regarded to realize more about the mechanisms underlying the disease process. It is revealed that the progression of breast cancer may be strongly linked to chronic inflammation owing to the role of inflammatory factors in genetic instability and subsequent cancer predisposition. Although the association between breast cancer and inflammatory pathways has been well-defined now, only recent evidence pointed towards the inflammation-related microRNAs (miRNAs) as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets involved in the crosstalk of multiple pathways during breast cancer development. Moreover, the practical interactions between these miRNAs and inflammatory factors are also a little characterized. In this review, we intended to describe the effects of predominant inflammatory pathways such as cytokines, phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B, and nuclear factor kappa B in association with tumor promoting and tumor suppressing miRNAs on breast cancer progression. Providing new studies in the field of combining biomarkers for early diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring breast cancer are very important. Notably, understanding the underlying mechanisms of miRNAs as a possible link between inflammation and tumorigenesis may offer a novel insight for combating this epidemic.     

Fetal growth and subsequent risk of breast cancer: results from long term follow up of Swedish cohort

ObjectiveTo investigate whether size at birth and rate of fetal growth influence the risk of breast cancer in adulthood.DesignCohort identified from detailed birth records, with 97% follow up.SettingUppsala Academic Hospital, Sweden.Participants5358 singleton females born during 1915-29, alive and traced to the 1960 census.ResultsSize at birth was positively associated with rates of breast cancer in premenopausal women. In women who weighed ⩾4000 g at birth rates of breast cancer were 3.5 times (95% confidence interval 1.3 to 9.3) those in women of similar gestational age who weighed <3000 g at birth. Rates in women in the top fifths of the distributions of birth length and head circumference were 3.4 (1.5 to 7.9) and 4.0 (1.6 to 10.0) times those in the lowest fifths (adjusted for gestational age). The effect of birth weight disappeared after adjustment for birth length or head circumference, whereas the effects of birth length and head circumference remained significant after adjustment for birth weight. For a given size at birth, gestational age was inversely associated with risk (P=0.03 for linear trend). Adjustment for markers of adult risk factors did not affect these findings. Birth size was not associated with rates of breast cancer in postmenopausal women.ConclusionsSize at birth, particularly length and head circumference, is associated with risk of breast cancer in women aged <50 years. Fetal growth rate, as measured by birth size adjusted for gestational age, rather than size at birth may be the aetiologically relevant factor in premenopausal breast cancer.

What is already known on this topic

There is some evidence that birth weight is related to risk of breast cancerThe exact nature of any association and whether it differs at premenopausal and postmenopausal ages is unclearFew studies have examined the effect of other measures of birth size and of gestational age

What this study adds

There are strong positive associations between measures of birth size and rates of breast cancer at premenopausal ages that persisted after adjustment for adult risk factorsFor a given birth size, gestational age was inversely associated with risk, suggesting that the rate of fetal growth may be aetiologically relevant to premenopausal breast cancerThere was no association between birth characteristics and rates of breast cancer at postmenopausal ages     

Programación Fetal in utero y su impacto en la salud del adulto

Adverse events during intrauterine life may program organ growth and favor disease later in life. This is the usually called ‘Barker's hypothesis’. Increasing evidence suggests that conditions like vascular disease, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes mellitus are programmed during the early stages of fetal development and become manifest in late stages of life, when there is an added impact of lifestyle and other conventional acquired environmental risk factors that interact with genetic factors. The aim of this review was to provide additional, updated evidence to support the association between intrauterine fetal health and increased prevalence of chronic non-communicable diseases in adulthood. Various potential cellular and molecular mechanisms proposed to be related to the above hypothesis are discussed, including endothelial function, oxidative stress, insulin resistance, and mitochondrial function.     

The role of financial factors in acceptance of clinical BRCA genetic testing

Many women who are offered BRCA genetic testing by genetics professionals do not have the test, possibly for financial reasons. We explored financial factors implicated in non-uptake of BRCA testing in women who had received genetic counseling in a clinical setting. Specifically, we described financial factors (affordability, health insurance, other) involved with BRCA testing; compared nonfinancial factors (disease, sociodemographic, risk assessment) in women who did not have BRCA testing (nontesters) with women who had the test (testers); showed associations of financial and nonfinancial factors with BRCA testing; and identified predictors of non-uptake of BRCA testing. The sample of 100 women (64 nontesters and 36 testers) completed an anonymous mailed survey on financial factors; 52 of the nontesters answered questions about nonfinancial factors. Testers had significantly better affordability and insurance coverage (p < 0.001), more diagnoses of breast or ovarian cancer (p < 0.05) and higher rates of receiving post-counseling risk estimates (p < 0.05), than nontesters. Non-uptake was 5.5-fold more likely in women that could not afford full or partial payment for the test and was 15.5-fold more likely in women that did not recall receiving risk estimates post-counseling. For many women having risk factors for breast/ovarian cancer, affordability of BRCA testing and insurance coverage for the test remain problematic. Post-counseling reminders of risk estimates may contribute to uptake of testing.